No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Gracelen Care Center

10948 S.e. Boise, Portland, OR 97266 · For profit - Corporation · 80 certified beds · (503) 760-1727 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0604) — most recent Dec 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0604) — most recent Dec 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8935 SE Powell Blvd · (503) 772-4335 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens1.0 mi
4325 SE 82nd Ave · (503) 775-9603 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
10135 SE Foster Rd · (503) 772-5003 · Call to confirm hours
Park
SE Steele St & SE 100th Ave · (503) 823-2525 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.3%14.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.1%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.1%4.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.8%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%2.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.8%20.6%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.5%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.4%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%5.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.9%21.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.9%13.9%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.3%81.2%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.521.481.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.632.351.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.10U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
0.68
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.35
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.52
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 64.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.35 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.68 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-25)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

58 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were followed during meal service for 2 of 3 hallways. This placed residents at risk for infections. Findings include: a. Resident 59 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including stroke and hemiplegia/hemiparesis (the loss of ability to move part or most of the body) of the non-dominant side. Resident 59's 11/18/22 admission MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact. On 1/13/23 at 11:47 AM Staff 3 (RNCM) and surveyor were with Resident 59 when Staff 31 (CNA) brought Resident 59's lunch into her/his room. Staff 31 removed the plastic wrap from Resident 59's plate then set the plate followed by cups of liquid on the bedside table approximately one inch from Resident 59's partially filled urinal. Staff 3 observed Staff 31 place the uncovered food and cups of liquid next to and near Resident 59's partially filled urinal and in approximately two to three minutes, Staff 3 left the room and returned with Staff 31. Staff 3 asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure equipment was properly secure to prevent falls for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing an avoidable fall, resulting with a fractured hip which required surgery. The facility identified the failed practice; an avoidable accident related to improper use of a shower gurney (a specialized piece of equipment designed to bathe individuals who are unable to sit upright during a shower). The facility removed the device from use until staff were trained, and competency was demonstrated. Corrective actions were completed on 1/17/25. This failed practice was identified as past noncompliance. Findings include:Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnosis including movement disorder and chronic incomplete quadriparesis (form of paralysis affecting all four limbs with some motor function and sensation preserved). Resident 1's 8/23/24 Annual MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to immediately notify the physician of a significant change in condition and head injury for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1 and 3) reviewed for change in condition. This resulted in delayed treatment for Resident 3's significant change in condition and placed residents at risk for unmet needs and delayed treatment. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including dementia and partial paralysis. Resident 3's Progress Notes revealed the following: - On 5/23/23: Witness 4 (Physician) assessed Resident 3 related to the resident's family report of pain during a bowel movement. An immediate x-ray was ordered. - On 5/24/23: Results from the x-ray found no definitive evidence of lack of bowel motility or obstruction. - On 6/1/23 at 10:20 AM: Resident 3 was found in their bed with brown and yellow emesis (vomit). The resident's temperature was 101.7 (normal is 98.6), blood sugar 404 (normal is 70 to 100), blood pressure 195/85 (normal is 120/80). The resident's current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record reviewed it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for use of physical restraints. This failure resulted in Resident 6 displaying signs of emotional distress and verbalizing feelings of having been raped. Findings include: The facility's Physical Restraint policy and procedure last updated 6/22/23, indicated the following: -Physical restraints were defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. -Emergency use of physical restraints could be used when it was determined the resident or others were in a life threatening or safety threatening situation (fear for the safety of the resident or others due to violent behavior such as attacking others). The emergency use of a restraint is only for the period of imminent danger. -The RCM (Resident Care Manager), DNS and Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to promptly transfer a resident to the hospital related to a significant change in condition for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for change in condition. This resulted in a subsequent decline in condition and delayed treatment for Resident 3. Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including dementia and partial paralysis. On 9/18/23 at 9:26 AM Witness 3 (Complainant) stated the facility failed to get Resident 3 timely medical attention prior to the resident being transferred to the hospital on 6/1/23. Resident 3's Progress Notes revealed the following: - On 5/23/23: Witness 4 (Physician) assessed Resident 3 related to the resident's family report of pain during a bowel movement. An immediate x-ray was ordered. - On 5/24/23: Results from the x-ray found no definitive evidence of lack of bowel motility or obstruction. - On 6/1/23 at 10:20 AM: Resident 3 was found in their bed with brown and yellow emesis (vomit). The resident's temperature was 101.7 (normal is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-09-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters for nutrition for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1 and 3) reviewed for weight loss. This resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 3 having severe weight loss and placed residents at risk for weight loss. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including dementia and partial paralysis. Resident 3's weight record revealed the following: - On 10/25/21 the resident weighed 177 pounds. - On 11/23/21 the resident weighed 167.2 pounds (a 5.5% weight loss in 29 days). - On 5/4/22 the resident weighed 146.8 pounds (a 17% weight loss over six months). Resident 3's Nutrition At Risk notes revealed the following: - 11/28/21: The resident's 30-day meal intake indicated the resident consumed less than 50% 20 times, 51-75% 24 times, 76-100% 25 times and refused 17 meals. Interventions included a liquid supplement (administration frequency was not specified). The resident required extensive assistance with dining. The Plan was for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2023-01-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility's quality assessment and assurance committee (QAA) failed to systematically identify and correct deficiencies in the areas of dignity, quality of care, accidents, nursing services, staffing and infection control. This placed residents at risk for adverse consequences, injury and contracting infectious diseases and resulted in a hip fracture for Resident 41 and a worsening wound for Resident 27. Findings include: The facility's 8/15/22 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan identified the following goal for improvement: -To improve and maintain survey compliance for the rest of 2022 and on-going. The facility's 1/19/2023 survey identified the following: 1. The facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner. This deficient practice was also identified on the 1/2022 survey. Refer to F550. 2. The facility failed to assess, monitor and document non-pressure related wounds, provide appropriate equipment to address the positioning needs of residents and follow physician orders.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively assess/measure resident wounds, monitor wounds for signs/symptoms of infection and document the effectiveness of wound treatment for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#27) reviewed for skin conditions. This failure resulted in Resident 27's worsening wound as evidenced by two emergency room trips and three antibiotic courses. Findings include: Resident 27 was admitted to the facility in 10/2021 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and stroke with hemiparesis (weakness to one side of the body) affecting left non-dominant side. The 10/26/22 Care Plan indicated Resident 27 was at risk for actual skin impairment/pressure ulcer. Interventions included: Encourage small, frequent position changes, pressure reduction mattress on bed and chair, turn and reposition every two hours while in bed, use pillows to separate pressure areas, weekly skin audit by the nurse and as needed. The 10/26/22 Annual MDS indicated Resident 27 was moderately cognitively impaired and at risk for pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and a safe environment for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 41 and 58) reviewed for accidents. This failure placed residents at increased risk for injuries and resulted in Resident 41 sustaining a hip fracture from a fall. Findings include: 1. Resident 41 was admitted to the facility in 6/2018 with diagnoses including frontotemporal dementia (a type of dementia characterized by changes in emotions, behavior, personality and language). Resident 41's 8/31/22 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired, she/he required extensive assistance from at least two staff for transfers and was totally dependent on staff for locomotion on and off of the unit. Resident 41's 9/12/22 Morse Fall Scale revealed the resident was at high risk for falling. A review of Resident 41's 9/14/22 Care Plan revealed the resident was at risk for falls due to cognitive impairment and lack of impulse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-01-19 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received timely specialized rehabilitative services (PT and OT services) for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s15 and 59) reviewed for therapy. This failure resulted in Resident 59 displaying signs of distress, depressed mood, a decline from former social patterns and repeatedly verbalizing feelings of frustration. Findings include: The Stroke Foundation, What to Expect From a Stroke, dated 2023, explained that stroke rehabilitation (PT, OT and SLP) is the therapy and activities that drive recovery by helping to re-learn ways of doing things affected by a stroke. It aims to stimulate the brain to change and adapt. By creating new pathways a person can learn to use other parts of the brain to recover function of those parts affected by the stroke. Improvement after a stroke can continue for years but for many people it's quickest in the first six months. 1. Resident 59 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to accurately document an elopement assessment for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for elopement. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate medical records. Findings include:Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including monoplegia of upper limb following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke) affecting left dominant side.On 5/13/26 at 12:16 PM, Resident 1 was observed to ambulate independently without an assistive device.Resident 1's care plan initiated on 4/30/26 documented Resident 1:-Had an alteration in neurological status related to monoplegia of the upper limb following a nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage affecting left dominant side;-Was independent for ambulation and transfers and did not use an assistive device; and-Was alert and oriented times three. Resident 1's 4/29/26 hospital Occupational Therapy Note indicated with independent activities of daily living tasks in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report an incident of suspected physical abuse in a timely manner for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 6 and 7) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include:Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 11/2024 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder.Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with diagnoses including senile degeneration of the brain with anxiety and agitation.On 2/14/26 at 6:27 PM, a FRI was submitted which indicated on 2/14/26 at 10:00 AM, Resident 7 struck Resident 6 with her/his reader stick after Resident 6 wandered into Resident 7's room looking for her/his items. A Progress Note on 2/14/26 at 12:28 PM, indicated Staff 7 (Social Services Director) noticed Resident 7 received assistance with a bandage to her/his knee. When asked, Resident 7 stated she/he was hit by another resident after she/he entered Resident 7's room and approached her/him.On 3/10/26 at 12:26 PM, Staff 2 (DNS) stated she was aware of the incident of potential abuse between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's change of condition was assessed in a timely manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#7) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for a delay of care and unmet treatment needs. Findngs include:Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 11/2024 with diagnoses including end stage kidney disease and diabetes.Provider Notes dated 11/15/24 and 11/29/24 indicated Resident 7 was alert but tired on exam. Resident 7 was able to answer questions appropriately. Resident 7's 11/29/24 admission MDS indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment.A CMA Medication Administration Note dated 12/8/24 at 8:42 AM Staff 26 (CMA) indicated the following:-Resident 7 was unable to stay awake long enough to drink fluids despite cueing and redirection.-Staff 43 (RN) completed an assessment and directed Staff 26 to wait 20 minutes before reattempting medication administration.-Upon the second attempt, Resident 7 continued to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess, monitor, and treat pressure ulcers for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#7) reviewed for wound care. This placed residents at risk for unassessed wounds, unmet treatment needs and worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include:The 2019 National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries Quick Reference Guide indicated the following recommendations regarding pressure ulcer assessment:- Assess the pressure ulcer initially and re-assess it at least weekly to monitor progress towards healing;- Document the results of all wound assessments;- Assess and document physical characteristics including: location, category/stage, size, tissue type(s), color, peri-wound condition, wound edges, sinus tracts, undermining, tunneling, exudate, and odor; - Select a uniform, consistent method for measuring wound length, width, depth or wound area to facilitate meaningful comparisons of wound measurements…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours 7 days per week for 8 of 62 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of care. Findings include: A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports for 7/1/24 through 7/31/24 and 6/19/25 through 7/24/25 revealed there were eight days without eight consecutive hours of registered nurse coverage on any shift in a 24 hour period:-7/7/24-7/13/24-7/14/24-7/21/24-7/22/24-7/28/24-7/29/24-7/13/25On 7/25/25 at 9:12 AM Staff 16 (Staffing Coordinator) acknowledged the facility did not have adequate RN coverage on the above dates and understood the need to staff the facility with an RN in order to provide residents with care and assessments they needed. On 7/25/25 9:44 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she expected the facility to be staffed appropriately with RN coverage to ensure residents received appropriate care and services.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report an incident of potential abuse to the State Agency within the required timeframe for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: The facility's 6/12/18 Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure revealed it was the policy of the facility that all suspected or alleged cases of abuse shall be reported according to State and Federal regulations. On 7/21/25 at 6:55 PM Witness 3 (Family Member) stated Resident 1 moved rooms because her/his former roommate, Resident 8, shoved her/him into a wall. Witness 3 reported the physical altercations to facility staff immediately. On 7/25/25 at 10:18 AM Staff 21 (RN) stated she did not contact the State Agency to report the allegation of abuse. Staff 21 stated the incident occurred prior to the start of her shift at 6:00 PM and the information was reported to her during shift change. Staff 21 stated she called Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 2 (DNS) to report the allegation more than two hours after she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse and inaccurate investigations. Findings include:The facility's 6/12/18 Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure revealed all suspected or alleged cases of abuse shall be thoroughly and completely investigated. The procedure directed staff as soon as a report of alleged or suspected abuse was received, the investigation would begin and be completed within five days. Resident 1's 7/18/25 progress note revealed she/he had been moved to a new room following an altercation with her/his former roommate. On 7/21/25 at 6:55 PM Witness 3 (Family Member) stated Resident 1 moved rooms because her/his former roommate, Resident 8, shoved her/him into a wall. Witness 3 reported the altercation to staff immediately. On 7/25/25 at 10:18 AM Staff 21 (RN) stated staff told her of an incident which occurred prior to the start of her shift at 6:00 PM, between Resident 1 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement the care plan for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 3 and 59) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for avoidable injury. Findings include:1. Resident 59 was admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including stroke and anxiety. A Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] determined Resident 59 was at high risk for falling. The 5/21/25 Care Plan identified Resident 59 a high fall risk for falls. Interventions included a fall mat to be placed at bedside when the resident was in bed. On 7/24/25 at 8:32 AM Resident 59 was observed asleep in bed without a fall mat in place. On 7/24/25 at 8:34 AM Staff 7 (CNA) stated Resident 59 was at risk for falls but did not have any fall interventions in place. On 7/24/25 at 8:59 AM Staff 3 (Resident Care Manager-LPN) stated Resident 59's Care Plan included having a fall mat in place when the resident was in bed. Staff 3 confirmed Resident 59's care plan were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide care planned interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#48) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for injury from falls. Findings include:Resident 48 admitted on 1/2025 with diagnoses including fibromyalgia (health condition which causes pain and tenderness throughout the body).The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident 48 was cognitively impaired and she/he had a history of falls.The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident 48 used a FWW (front wheel walker) and wheelchair to assist with ambulation.A review of Resident 48's medical record revealed the resident fell on 1/27/25, 5/11/25, 5/20/25 and 6/4/25.The 5/19/25 care plan indicated Resident 48 was to have a call don't fall sign within eyesight of the resident and was to have a FWW.On 7/21/25 at 9:55 AM and 1:03 PM, Resident 48 was observed leaning behind her/his wheelchair and used it to ambulate to the restroom.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5%. There were three errors in 25 opportunities resulting in a 12% error rate. This placed residents at risk for reduced medication efficacy and adverse medication side effects. Findings include: The 2019 Insulin Lispro Solostar Pen Manufacturer Instructions for Use and the 2022 How to Use Lantus Pen Manufacturer Instructions specified the following:- to inject your dose, clean site with an alcohol swab, keep the pen straight, insert the needle into your skin, use the thumb to press the injection button all the way down. When the number in the dose window returns to zero as you inject, slowly count to 10 before removing (counting to 10 will makes sure residents received the full insulin dose), release the button and remove the needle from your skin.The facility's 3/2025 Insulin Administration Policy specified the following:-Depress the plunger and remove the needle after approximately five seconds.The 2024 What Happens If I Take CREON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication storage was free from expired biologicals for 1 of 1 medication rooms and treatment carts were locked and secured appropriately for 2 of 2 treatment carts observed (West Hall and East Hall) during random observations for medication and treatment cart storage and medication rooms. This placed residents at risk for unsafe access to stored medications and diminished treatment efficacy. Findings include:The facility's 11/2020 Storage of Medications Policy specified the following: - Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels are returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. 1.On [DATE] at 11:15 AM, one open, vial of tuberculin (used for the testing in the diagnosis of Tuberculosis) dated [DATE] was observed inside the refrigerator located in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to perform hand hygiene for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#11) reviewed for wound care. This placed residents at an increased risk of infected wounds. Findings include:Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (partial or complete paralysis of all four limbs).The 2024 CDC Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Health care workers specified the following:-Clean your hands immediately after glove removal to prevent the spread of germs and potential infections.A review of Resident 11's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was admitted with four pressure ulcers.A review of Resident 11's Annual MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident acquired an in-facility pressure ulcer.A review of Resident 11's 7/2025 MAR indicated daily wound care to the sacrum (a bone at the base of the spine) and the right ischium (a bone forming the lower and back part of the hip bone) pressure ulcers.On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from mental abuse by staff for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for further mental abuse. Findings include: On 9/5/24 the State Survey Agency received a public complaint which alleged Resident 8 was spoken to rudely and threatened by a CNA. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 9/2024, with diagnoses including vascular dementia and a hip fracture. Resident 8's 9/9/24 admission MDS indicated she/he was cognitively intact. On 12/17/24 at 9:00 AM, Staff 5 (CNA) stated Staff 3 (CNA) stated to her and Staff 4 (CNA) tell Resident 8 that you will put them in a room by herself/himself with the door closed and no call light if Resident 8 was on the call light too much. Staff 5 stated Staff 3 informed them she knew Resident 8 from the hospital and saying those things worked there. Staff 5 stated they immediately reported to management. On 12/19/24 @ 8:03 AM, Staff 4 (CNA) stated Staff 3 (CNA) stated to her and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to document the basis for transfer and failed to include code and health status to the receiving provider for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#7) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate health care. Findings include: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 8/2024, with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury and delirium. Resident 7's 10/3/24 Discharge MDS indicated the resident was discharged to an acute care hospital. Review of Resident 7's medical record revealed no documentation to indicate the basis for the transfer and if appropriate information was communicated to the receiving hospital. There was no information demonstrating why the facility could not meet the resident's needs and whether the discharge was initiated by the resident or the facility. On 12/19/24 at 10:40 AM, Staff 1 (DNS) was informed of the findings of this investigation and acknowledged the discharge information was not documented in Resident 7's medical record.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the Dietary Manager failed to obtain the required certification to provide dietary management services for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for qualified dietary staff. This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary needs. Findings include: From 4/2/24 through 4/8/24 between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Staff 33 (Dietary Manager) was observed providing Dietary Manager services in the facility kitchen. On 4/5/24 at 11:31 AM Staff 33 stated he had been the Dietary Manager since 4/2022 and had not completed the required certification required for his position as Dietary Manager. On 4/8/24 at 11:04 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed she was aware Staff 33 had not obtained the required certification.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure nursing staff competencies for 5 of 5 sampled staff (#s 14, 22, 23, 24 and 25) reviewed for competencies. This placed residents at risk for poor quality of care. Findings include: On 4/4/24 at 3:08 PM and 4/5/24 at 8:40 AM Staff 2 (DNS) and Staff 27 (Staffing Coordinator) were asked to provide evidence of staff competencies for Staff 14 (RN), Staff 22 (LPN), Staff 23 (LPN), Staff 24 (RN) and Staff 25 (RN). On 4/4/24 at 4:40 PM and 4/5/24 at 2:38 PM Staff 2 provided an incomplete competency review for Staff 14. Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 27 stated they did not have the requested competencies for Staff 22, Staff 23, Staff 24 and Staff 25. Refer to F880

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-08 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNAs received annual performance reviews for 4 of 5 randomly selected CNA staff (#s 8, 17, 18 and 19) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of care by competent staff. Findings include: A review of personnel records on 4/5/24 with Staff 27 (Staffing Coordinator) indicated the following employees had not received their annual performance evaluations: -Staff 8 (CNA), adjusted seniority date 10/4/08: no annual performance review was completed. -Staff 17 (CNA), adjusted seniority date 11/22/22: no annual performance review was completed. -Staff 18 (CNA), adjusted seniority date 1/21/20: no annual performance review was completed. -Staff 19 (CNA), adjusted seniority date 10/9/21; no annual performance review was completed. On 4/5/24 at 11:52 AM Staff 27 confirmed annual performance reviews for Staff 8, Staff 17, Staff 18 and Staff 19 were not completed. On 4/8/24 at 10:33 AM Staff 2 (DNS) reported she was aware many CNA staff did not have their annual performance reviews completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices for 3 of 11 sampled staff (#s 8, 14 and 15) observed during medication administration and dining. This placed residents at risk for the spread of infection. Findings include: 1. The CDC website, section titled Infection Prevention during Blood Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Administration specified there was an increased risk for exposure to bloodborne viruses through contaminated equipment, such as glucometers (a device used to measure blood sugar levels) when shared. Using a glucometer for more than one person without cleaning and disinfecting it in between uses contributed to transmission of HBV (Hepatitis B virus). Glucometers should be cleaned and disinfected after every use. The facility's 7/2023 Glucometer Disinfection Policy & Procedure specified glucometers were disinfected after each use with an EPA-registered disinfectant that was effective against viruses. The disinfecting procedure directed staff to wash hands before and after the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 4 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 16, 17, 18, and 19) reviewed for evidence of in-service training. This placed residents at risk for lack of quality care. Findings include: On 4/5/24 at 1:00 PM Staff 2 (DNS) provided a list of training hours for the sampled staff and confirmed the following: -Staff 16 (CNA): 8.6 annual training hours; -Staff 17 (CNA): 0 annual training hours; -Staff 18 (CNA): 9.10 annual training hours and -Staff 19 (CNA): 4 annual training hours. On 4/5/24 at 1:00 PM and 4/8/24 at 10:33 AM Staff 2 confirmed Staff 16, Staff 17, Staff 18 and Staff 19 did not complete the required 12 hours of annual in-service trainings. Staff 2 stated she was aware CNA trainings were not being completed.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity related to dining needs for 1 of 2 sampled dining rooms reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for lack of a dignity. Findings include: The facility's 3/2022 Assistance with Meals Policy indicated residents would receive assistance with meals in a manner that met the individual needs of each resident. Residents unable to feed themselves would be fed with attention to safety, comfort and dignity including not standing over residents while assisting them with meals. On 4/2/24 between the hours of 11:55 AM and 12:30 PM, during the lunch meal in the East dining room, the following observations were made: -The East dining room consisted of four tables with two to three residents placed at each table, one resident placed at a bedside table and another resident sitting in a wheelchair. -Staff 8 (CNA) provided assisted with the lunch meal at a table with three males, standing over one resident as she provided eating assistance. While Staff 8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-08 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure consent was obtained prior to administering psychotropic and antiviral medications to 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 12 and 29) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for being uninformed about their medications. Findings include: 1. Resident 29 was admitted to the facility in 12/2023 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. Resident 29's Profile Information Sheet indicated the resident's spouse was the resident's responsible party. Resident 29's 12/2023, 1/2024, 2/2024, 3/2024 and 4/2024 Physician Orders included mirtazapine (antidepressant) and quetiapine (antipsychotic). Resident 29's 12/2023, 1/2024, 2/2024, 3/2024 and 4/2024 MARs revealed the resident received mirtazapine 15 mg daily and quetiapine 25 mg - 50 mg daily. Review of Resident 29's health record revealed no documentation to indicate the resident or her/his representative was informed of the risks, benefits and potential side effects of mirtazapine and quetiapine and no evidence the resident consented to receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#37) reviewed for wheelchair accommodations. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 37 admitted to the facility in 4/2021 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a disorder affecting movements). Observation on 4/3/24 at 12:21 PM revealed Resident 37 was sitting in her/his wheelchair with her/his calves pressed against the back of exposed metal on her/his chair and the left arm rest pad was missing, leaving a metal bar exposed for her/his arm to rest on. On 4/5/24 at 10:08 AM Resident 37 stated the back of her/his legs hurt. On 4/5/24 at 10:34 AM Staff 10 (CNA) stated she reported the missing arm rest pad to maintenance a while ago. On 4/5/24 at 11:22 AM Staff 3 (LPN Resident Care Manager) stated she was not aware of Resident 37's missing arm rest pad or and that her/his legs were resting against exposed metal. Staff 3 observed the back of Resident 37's calves and stated there were bad…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a resident for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 2/2024 with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event). Resident 5's 3/5/24 admission MDS indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including alcohol-induced dementia. Resident 4's 3/22/24 admission MDS indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 4's 5/16/24 Care Plan revealed the following: -The resident was involved in an incident which involved physical aggression on 5/8/24 with another resident and on 5/14/24 with a staff member. -The resident's behaviors included wandering, exit-seeking, verbal aggression and physical aggression. A 5/21/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain consent, assess, monitor and reevaluate for use of a restraint for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#5) reviewed for restraints. This placed residents at risk for inappropriate use of a restraint. Findings include: The facility's 4/2017 Use of Restraints Policy stated the following: -Restraints shall only be used upon the written order of a physician and after obtaining consent from the resident and/or representative. -Restrained individuals shall be reviewed regularly (at least quarterly) to determine whether they are candidates for restraint reduction, less restrictive methods of restraints, or total restraint elimination. - Resident and/or surrogate/sponsor shall be informed about the potential risks and benefits of all options under consideration, including the use of restraints, not using restraints, and the alternatives to restraint use. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 8/2007 with diagnoses including schizophrenia and dementia with behavioral disturbances. A 7/12/23 Annual MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to accurately reflect the needs of residents for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 12/2023 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition), bipolar disorder (a mental health condition) and stroke. Resident 8's current care plan indicated the following: -Resident 8 required extensive assistance of one person for toileting. -Resident 8 required extensive assistance of one person for dressing and personal hygiene. -Resident 8 required extensive assistance of one person for ambulation while using a front wheeled walker. -Resident 8 required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility and transfers. Multiple observations from 4/2/24 through 4/8/24 between the hours of 8:00 AM and 3:30 PM revealed Resident 8 independently moved in her/his bed, transferred from the bed to standing and/or to her/his wheelchair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-08 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#53) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for unmet discharge needs. Findings include: Resident 53 was admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including normal pressure hydrocephalus (abnormal buildup of fluid in the brain). The resident was discharged from the facility on 1/14/24 as a resident initiated discharge. A review of Resident 53's health record indicated there was no discharge summary documentation. On 4/8/24 at 10:55 AM Staff 2 (DNS) was not able to provide documentation of a discharge summary for Resident 53.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 8 and 19) reviewed for edema and hospice services. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. The undated Hospice and Nursing Facility Services Agreement specified the facility shall provide in a timely manner, those drugs related to the management of the terminal illness. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 4/2018 with diagnoses including Huntington's disease (a degenerative disease which affects movement and cognitive functions). Resident 19's 2/8/24 Significant Change MDS indicated the resident received Hospice services. On 4/2/24 at 10:58 AM Witness 1 (Hospice RN) stated an order for glycopyrrolate 1 mg, prescribed to control Resident 19's oral secretions, was faxed to the facility on 3/29/24. Review of Resident 19's health record revealed the glycopyrrolate was not implemented and administered to Resident 19 until 4/3/24, five days after the medication was prescribed. On 4/4/24 at 4:14 PM Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were not prescribed unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#29) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for experiencing adverse medication effects. Findings include: Resident 29 was admitted to the facility in 12/2023 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. A 1/11/24 Physician Order included acyclovir (anitviral medication used to treat herpes simplex viral infections), 800 mg, take one half tablet twice a day for prophylaxis (action taken to prevent disease). The order did not specify which disease the medication was prophylactically prescribed and no further information or rationale for the medication was included in the order. Resident 29's 1/2024, 2/2024, 3/2024 and 4/2024 MARs revealed the resident received acyclovir daily beginning 1/12/24. On 4/5/24 at 1:00 PM Staff 12 (LPN Resident Care Manager) was asked about the indication for use of acyclovir. Staff 12 stated today she asked Staff 35 (Physician) for clarification regarding the use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for living in an unkempt environment. Findings include: Observations of the facility's general environment and residents' rooms from 4/2/24 through 4/8/24 identified the following issues: -room [ROOM NUMBER] had a section of missing cove base behind the door, scrapes of missing paint along the wall under the window, gouges of missing wood on the window sill and the bedside table base was covered with paint chips. -Floor mats in multiple resident rooms were torn and tattered. -West hall sitting area across from the DNS office had an approximate 12 inch piece of wall covering peeling from underneath the window sill, a long crack in the wall with missing paint above the hand hygiene dispenser, and four large screws sticking out of the wall below the flag quilt. -The west dining room had an area on the north wall with missing paint and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report an incident of suspected abuse in a timely manner for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 3 and 18) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 12/2020 with diagnoses including dementia with agitation. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 12/2020 with diagnoses including dementia with behavior disturbance and delusional disorder. On 7/25/22 at 11:53 AM a FRI was submitted which indicated on 7/22/22 at 6:17 PM Resident 18 and Resident 3 were overheard yelling at each other and then observed hitting each other. On 4/5/24 at 1:36 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed the incident of abuse between Resident 3 and Resident 18 occurred and there was a delay in reporting the incident within the required two hour reporting timeframe.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess a pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for skin impairment. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers and delayed healing. Findings include: CMS Appendix PP dated 2/3/23 defined the following: Stage 1 Pressure Injury (PI): Non-blanchable erythema of intact skin Intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable erythema (redness). In darker skin tones, the PI may appear with persistent red, blue, or purple hues. The presence of blanchable erythema or changes in sensation, temperature, or firmness may precede visual changes. Color changes of intact skin may also indicate a deep tissue PI (see below). Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including partial paralysis. A Progress Note dated 7/12/22 indicated a Red patch of skin smaller than a dime was found on resident's upper buttocks, close to the left cheek. An order was entered for a sacrum (tail bone) dressing to be changed daily and monitor for increased redness. (The note failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility to ensure safe transfers were performed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for transfer safety. This placed residents at risk for accidents and falls. Findings include: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's. The facility's Using a Mechanical Lifting Machine policy from 4/2017 stated, at least two nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift. Resident 4's 2/2023 Care Plan stated all transfers were to be performed with a sit to stand mechanical lift. A 5/17/23 Incident Review reported Resident 4 experienced 2 lacerations on her/his head which were determined to be as a result of injury from an unsafe transfer using a sit to stand mechanical lift with the assistance of only one CNA. On 9/19/23 at 9:26 AM Staff 15 stated Resident 4 required the use of a sit to stand mechanical lift which always required two trained nurses to safely use. Staff 15 stated she observed Staff 16 assisting Resident 4 with ADLs on the morning of 5/17/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0777 — isolated
    Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide timely lab services for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for change in condition. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. Resident 1's Progress Notes revealed the following: - On 6/6/23 at 2:49 PM: The resident's spouse notified the facility the resident's hands and feet were twitching which the spouse thought might be related to a UTI. The resident's provider was notified and a urine sample would be collected. - On 6/6/23 at 8:35 PM: A urine sample was obtained from a urinal. - On 6/7/23 at 2:15 PM: The urine sample was collected. - On 6/9/23 at 9:06 PM: The lab was called to make sure a urine sample could be collected on the weekend before a sample was obtained. No notes were found to indicate why a second urine sample was needed. - On 6/11/23 at 6:41 AM: A urine sample was obtained by straight catheter. - On 6/16/23 at 7:09 AM: A lab report dated 6/14/23 revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the Dietary Manager (DM) did not obtain the required certification to provide dietary management services for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for qualified dietary staff. This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary needs. Findings include: Observations from 1/9/23 through 1/19/23 from 8:30 AM to 4:30 PM revealed Staff 6 (Dietary Manager) functioned in the capacity of the facility's Dietary Manager. On 1/13/23 at 10:18 AM Staff 6 stated he had been the Dietary Manager since 4/2022 and did not complete the required certification for the position as Dietary Manager. Staff 6 stated it would be approximately nine months until he finished the course. On 1/19/23 at 11:28 AM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed Staff 6 did not have the required certification for the Dietary Manager position.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-19 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to designate a qualified and trained Infection Preventionist for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection prevention and control. This placed residents at risk for inadequate care related to infection control. Findings include: On 1/8/23 at 12:40 PM Staff 5 (RN/IP) stated he began working as the facility's Infection Preventionist in 9/2022 and he did not complete the CDC Infection Preventionist training by the time he assumed the position. A review of training certificates provided by Staff 5 revealed Staff 5 completed seven of the 23 modules and submodules included in the training. On 1/12/23 at 2:05 PM Staff 5 stated he planned to complete the remaining modules and submodules of the CDC Infection Preventionist training by the end of February 2023. On 1/19/23 at 1:40 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged the facility lacked a certified infection preventionist.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours per day 7 days per week for 9 out of 100 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely assessments and care. Findings include: Review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports from 7/1/22 through 8/31/22 and 12/1/22 through 1/8/23 revealed on 7/3, 7/10, 7/11, 8/12, 8/13, 8/14, 12/15, 12/26 and 1/2 there was no RN coverage for eight consecutive hours. On 1/17/23 at 8:41 AM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged the facility lacked RN coverage on the identified days.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dignity for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#59) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity. Findings include: The facility's Quality of Life - Dignity policy revised 3/11/22 revealed: -Residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times and -Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Resident 59 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including stroke and hemiplegia/hemiparesis (the loss of ability to move part or most of the body) of the non-dominant side. Resident 59's 11/18/22 admission MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Multiple random observations from 1/8/23 through 1/17/23 between the hours of 8:00 AM and 11:50 PM revealed food and cups of liquid were frequently observed on the bedside table near Resident 59's urinal. On 1/13/23 at 11:47 AM Staff 3 (RNCM) and surveyor were with Resident 59 when Staff 31 (CNA) brought Resident 59's lunch into her/his room. Staff 31 removed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident's representative in a timely manner regarding a resident-to-resident incident for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 32) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents and responsible parties at risk for lack of timely notification. Findings include: Resident 32 was admitted to the facility in 4/2018 with diagnoses including Huntington's disease (a progressive brain disorder) and a mental health disorder. Resident 32's admission Record indicated: Witness 1 (Complainant) was Guardian, Care Conference Person, Emergency Contact #1, and Next of Kin. A FRI revealed on 10/14/22 Resident 32 was involved in an incident with Resident 31. It was reported Resident 31 stood behind Resident 32 and grasped and shook Resident 32's head. The facility Alleged Abuse Checklist form dated 10/14/22 revealed Witness 1 (Complainant) was notified of the incident on 10/17/22, three days after the incident occurred. On 1/8/22 at 6:25 PM Witness 1 stated the facility did not notify her until 72 hours after the incident. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a personalized, homelike environment for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#41) reviewed for personal property. This placed residents at risk for living in an unhomelike environment. Findings include: Resident 41 was admitted to the facility in 6/2018 with diagnoses including frontotemporal dementia (a type of dementia characterized by changes in emotions, behavior, personality and language). A review of Resident 41's clinical record revealed the resident moved into a new room on 11/2/22. Observations of Resident 41's room from 1/8/23 to 1/12/23 between the hours of 8:10 AM to 3:20 PM revealed the resident's room to have blank walls except for one picture that did not belong to the resident. On 1/8/23 at 2:04 PM Witness 8 (Family Member) stated Resident 41 moved into her/his current room a few months ago. She stated the resident's previous room had numerous family photos and personalized pictures hanging on the walls. Witness 8 stated she requested the photos and pictures be moved to the resident's current room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain consent, assess, monitor and reevaluate for use of a restraint for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 22, 41 and 50) reviewed for restraints. This placed residents at risk for inappropriate use of a restraint. Findings include: 1. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in 9/2021 with diagnoses including schizophrenia. Resident 22's 12/15/21 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident had two or more falls and used a chair alarm daily. Resident 22's 3/16/22 Quarterly MDS, 6/15/22 Quarterly MDS, 9/14/22 Annual MDS and 12/14/22 Quarterly MDS assessments indicated the resident had no falls and used a chair alarm daily. Resident 22's 9/14/22 Fall CAA revealed the following: - [Resident] actually takes the device with [her/him] to bed to remind [her/himself] to wait for help to get up. If [she/he] turns in bed and activates device accidentally, [she/he] deactivates device by replacing magnet to reset the device. The CAA lacked comprehensive assessment components such as justification for the ongoing use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#59) reviewed for aspiration precautions (practices to help prevent food or fluids from entering the lungs). This placed residents at risk for choking or developing lung infections. Findings include: Resident 59 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including stroke and hemiplegia/hemiparesis (the loss of ability to move part or most of the body) of the non-dominant side. Resident 59's 11/18/22 admission MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 59's current Care Plan located in the resident's clinical record indicated Resident 59 was on a modified diet consisting of minced and moist diet textures (diet textures requiring little chewing and are finely chopped, grated, ground or mashed) and mildly thick liquids (liquids thickened to nectar consistency). The following aspiration precautions were in place: -Small bites, chew food completely; -Small sips of fluids…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to accurately reflect the resident needs for 2 of 9 sampled residents (#s 26 and 41) reviewed for ADLs and accidents. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility in 3/2020 with diagnoses including stroke. Resident 26's 11/9/22 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was not on Hospice. Resident 26's undated CNA Care Plan Reference Sheet indicated the resident was on Hospice. On 1/12/23 at 1:39 PM Staff 4 (RNCM) stated the CNA Care Plan Reference Sheet was designed to be used by staff, such as new CNAs and agency CNAs, who were unfamiliar with the resident. Staff 4 stated the reference sheet served as a quick reference with information about the resident and the type of care needed. Staff 4 reviewed Resident 26's CNA Care Plan Reference Sheet, stated Resident 26 was discharged from Hospice in 8/2022 and acknowledged the Care Plan was inaccurate. On 1/18/23 at 10:57 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated she expected the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide necessary care and services related to bathing/showering and nail care for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#59) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet hygiene needs. Findings include: Resident 59 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including stroke and hemiplegia/hemiparesis (the loss of ability to move part or most of the body) of the non-dominant side. Resident 59's 11/18/22 admission MDS indicated the resident had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of one person for bathing/showering and personal hygiene. Resident 59's 12/13/22 through 1/13/23 bathing/showering task logs indicated the resident received showers on Tuesday and Friday evening shift. Resident 59's bathing/showering task logs revealed the following: -12/13 not applicable; -12/16 not applicable; -12/20 not applicable; -12/23 not applicable; -12/27 not applicable; -12/30 shower completed; -1/3 shower completed; -1/6 not applicable; -1/10 not applicable and -1/13 not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activities program for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 22, 28 and 50) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life. Findings include: 1. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in 9/2021 with diagnoses including schizophrenia. Resident 22's 9/14/22 Annual MDS indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired, her/his vision and hearing were adequate and she/he preferred to read books, newspapers and magazines and liked to listen to music. The Activities CAA indicated Resident 22 liked magazines with news articles and the news was important to her/him. Resident 22's Care Plan included the following activity goals and interventions: - 10/13/22 Goal: provide activities that match resident's preference, ability, skill set and participation level. - Interventions: activities very important to [resident]:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services related to the use of an indwelling catheter for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#15) reviewed for catheter care. This placed residents at risk for unmet catheter needs. Findings include: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including stroke, urinary tract infection (infection in the bladder, kidneys or urethra) and urinary incontinence. The facility policy, Urinary Incontinence-Clinical Protocol, dated 3/11/22 indicated the following: -The staff and physician will monitor the individual for complications of an indwelling catheter such as symptomatic urinary infection, urosepsis, or urethral erosion or pain and for complications of medications used to treat urinary incontinence. -Upon admission or re-admission, residents will be assessed for a catheter in place and will ensure MD (Medical Doctor) order, care plan and TAR are in place. Resident 15's Progress Notes indicated on 12/15/22, Resident 15 was sent to the emergency room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary bowel medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s12 and 32) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for loose stools and diarrhea. Findings include: Resident 32 was admitted to the facility in 4/2018 with diagnoses including Huntington's disease. Resident 32's 12/2022 physician orders included Senna Plus tablet (a laxative and stool softener) 8.6-50 MG, two tablets by mouth twice a day related to constipation, HOLD for loose stools. Resident 32's 1/2023 MAR revealed Senna Plus was administered twice a day from 1/1/2023 through 1/18/23. Resident 32's 1/2023 Bowel Elimination Flowsheet revealed the resident had loose/diarrhea stools on the following days: - 1/1/23 - 1/3/23 - 1/5/23, two episodes of loose/diarrhea stools - 1/7/23 - 1/11/23 - 1/13/23, two episodes of loose/diarrhea stools - 1/14/23, two episodes of loose/diarrhea stools On 1/17/23 at 1:09 PM and 1:32 PM Staff 13 (CNA) and Staff 14 (CNA) stated they were responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication pass error rate of less than 5%. There were six errors in 33 opportunities resulting in an 18.18% error rate. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: 1. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 4/2018 with diagnoses including stroke. Resident 16's 12/2022 physician orders included the following medications: - Senna 8.6 mg (laxative) 1 tab, hold for loose stool; - DSS (stool softener) 250 mg, hold for loose stool; - Protonix (medication for stomach problems) 20 mg, give before breakfast. On 1/12/23 at 7:36 AM Staff 16 (LPN) was observed for Resident 16's medication administration. Staff 16 prepared the Senna, DSS and Protonix and other medications ordered for Resident 16's high blood pressure and entered the resident's room. Resident 16 was eating her/his breakfast and asked Staff 16 to wait a minute so she/he could eat the last two bites of her/his egg. After Resident 16 finished eating, the resident told Staff 16 she/he had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure provision of education related to risks and benefits, informed consent and the opportunity to receive administration of pneumococcal immunizations for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#55) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for being uninformed of their healthcare options and for contracting infectious diseases. Findings include: Resident 55 was admitted to the facility in 2/2022 with diagnoses including calculus of bile duct with acute cholecystitis without obstruction (a condition characterized by stones in the pathway between the liver with the small intestine). No evidence was found in Resident 55's clinical record to indicate she/he was screened for appropriateness to receive a pneumococcal immunization, provided information related to the risks and benefits or provided the opportunity to consent to or decline the immunization. On 1/19/23 at 12:23 PM Staff 5 (RN/IP) confirmed the resident was not screened, provided education about the immunization, or provided the opportunity to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 38E188. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next