No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Providence Child Center

830 NE 47th Avenue, Portland, OR 97213 · Non profit - Church related · 58 certified beds · (503) 930-4518 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Jan 2023Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$13,286 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • the CMS record shows $13,286 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-18)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5050 NE Hoyt St Ste 138 · (503) 643-1737 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1619 NE 42nd Ave · (971) 358-6888 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5250 NE Halsey St · (503) 528-2685 · Call to confirm hours
Park
825 NE 52nd Ave · (503) 823-7329 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
OCP0.1 mi
9 NE 55th Ave · (800) 548-8749

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.7%14.9%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.0%4.7%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.6%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection7.5%2.0%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.9%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained6.5%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.4%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication49.5%12.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%5.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.2%21.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.8%13.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication7.1%1.4%1.4%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.

Inspection trend

0
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-08)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to put services in place to eliminate the risk of elopement for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for elopement. Resident 1 was identified by the facility to have eloped from the building on 12/17/23 at approximately 4:00 PM and was not found until 9:00 PM. This failure was determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation because the facility failed to identify and put in place services to prevent Resident 1's elopement risk which placed residents at risk of harm or death. Immediate Jeopardy situation began on 12/19/23. Findings include: Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Dementia. Hospital discharge records dated 12/2/23 revealed Resident 1 had a history of severe cognitive impairment and history of wandering behaviors, risk of self-harm and required 24-hour care. The facility assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident 1 with wandering behaviors due to diagnosis of Dementia. On 12/17/23 a Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received necessary equipment to prevent a further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#3) reviewed for position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for worsening contractures. Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including contracture of multiple joints. Resident 3's 2/14/24 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident rarely/never made decisions, was dependent for all ADLs and experienced upper extremity impairment on both sides. A 3/6/24 Pediatric Physical Therapy Treatment Note indicated Resident 3 utilized hand splints. Resident 3's current HOB (Head of Bed) Care Plan directed the resident to wear hand splints when up in her/his wheelchair. Random observations of Resident 3 on 4/15/24 and 4/16/24 between 10:14 AM and 3:49 PM revealed the resident was up in her/his wheelchair without hand splints. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-30 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately document and display the DCSDR (Direct Care Staff Daily Report) in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors for 33 of 33 days reviewed for staffing and for 2 of 2 units. This placed residents and visitors at risk for being uninformed of available staff and hours worked by facility staff. Findings include: Random observations from 1/23/23 through 1/26/23 revealed the DCSDR forms on the unit downstairs were posted in a hallway adjacent to the entrance not visible to the public and the form was sideways. The DCSDR forms were blank or inaccurate and missing census, current staff and hours worked. The upstairs unit had a DCSDR posted outside the medication storage room and the forms were inaccurate, dated incorrectly, missing daily census, number of working staff and hours worked. A review of the two separate DCSDR's, dated from 12/25/22 through 1/26/23 revealed 33 instances where the forms did not indicate the same information for both units and portions of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-30 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with the opportunity to develop a Resident Council for 1 of 2 residential units (the adult unit) reviewed for Resident Council. This placed residents at risk for a lack of participation in group discussions regarding facility policies, procedures and resident rights. Findings include: The adult unit of the faciity had a census of eleven. Four of the eleven residents resided on the unit longer than 6 months. On 1/23/23 at 10:36 AM Staff 3 (DNS) stated the adult residential unit did not have a Resident Council. On 1/27/23 at 3:27 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated the adult unit did not have a Resident Council.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' personal information was not visible to the public for 1 of 2 resident care units. This placed residents at risk for unprotected personal heath information. Findings include: Observations from 1/23/23 to 1/27/23 revealed the presence of a large dry erase board in the main area of the adult care unit visible to all staff, residents and visitors. The board had documentation of room number and initials of each resident with care notes such as transfer status, appointments, hospice, dialysis, and behaviors. On 1/26/23 at 10:02 AM Staff 8 (RN) confirmed the facility utilized the white board as a means of communication for all staff and it was helpful when agency staff worked on the floor. Staff 8 stated it was easier than sifting through the electronic record to locate the care plan which was not easily accessible. On 1/27/23 at 9:17 AM Staff 6 (RN) indicated the facility had discussed options other than the white board for direct care communication but had not implemented an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate falls for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 8 admitted in 5/2022 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and a history of falls. Fall investigations revealed the following: *Fall #1: -On 6/25/22 Staff 23 (Former LPN) heard a noise from Resident 8's room and found the resident with her/his back to the toilet in a seated position on the floor. Resident 8 had a skin tear to the right elbow. Staff 16 (CNA) last toileted Resident 8 at 5:30 AM and Staff 16 indicated he assisted her/him to the bathroom roughly six times throughout the night. The bed alarm was not on when Resident 8 was found on the floor with her/his back to the toilet. The investigation revealed Staff Resident 8 transferred herself/himself to the bathroom unassisted however, Staff 16 forgot to reset the bed alarm after taking Resident 8 to the bathroom at 5:30 AM. Resident 8 had no attempts to get out of bed prior to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assure a Level I PASARR (Preadmission Screening for Individuals with a Mental Disorder and Individuals with Intellectual Disability) was completed for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for PASARR. This placed residents at risk for inappropriate placement in a nursing facility and a lack of needed services. Findings include: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 10/2020 with diagnoses including Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (a seizure disorder) and cerebral palsy. A review of the resident's electronic health record revealed Resident 10 was admitted for long term care in 10/2020 without the completion of a screening Level I PASARR. On 1/25/23 at 8:58 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated an emergency suspension of PASARR's was in effect at the time of Resident 10's admission into long term care and was not required. On 1/25/23 at 3:57 PM Staff 5 (Administrative Assistant) stated the facility attempted to obtain a Level I PASARR for Resident 10 on 9/28/20. On 1/27/23 at 10:14 AM, Staff 3 (DNS) and Staff 5 confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on and interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a bowel protocol was implemented for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#30) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for constipation. Findings include: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in 12/2022 with diagnoses including hydrocephalus (a brain disorder in which excess fluid accumulates in the non-fluid chambers of the brain), diabetes and schizoaffective disorder. Resident 30's 1/2023 physician orders instructed staff to administer the following: - polyethylene glycol (Miralax) powder for constipation daily as needed starting on 12/28/22; - senna (Senokot) tablet for constipation two times daily as needed starting on 12/28/22. Resident 30's 1/2023 bowel tracking revealed she/he had no bowel movement for four consecutive days (1/10, 1/11, 1/12 and 1/13/23). Resident 30 had a bowel movement on 1/14/23 and then no bowel movement for five consecutive days (1/15, 1/16, 1/17, 1/18 and 1/19/23). Resident 30's 1/2023 MAR revealed no medication was administered for constipation in 1/2023.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure fall safety measures were in place for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for increased falls. Findings include: Resident 8 admitted in 5/2022 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and a history of falls. Fall investigations revealed the following: *Fall #1 on 6/25/22: -Staff 23 (Former LPN) heard a noise from Resident 8's room and found her/his back to the toilet in a seated position on the floor. Resident 8 had a skin tear to the right elbow. Staff 16 (CNA) last toileted Resident 8 at 5:30 AM and Staff 16 indicated he assisted her/him to the bathroom roughly six times throughout the night. The bed alarm was not on when Resident 8 was found on the floor with her/his back to the toilet. The investigation revealed Resident 8 self-transferred herself/himself to the bathroom however Staff 16 forgot to reset the bed alarm after taking Resident 8 to the bathroom at 5:30 AM. Resident 8 had no attempts to get out of bed prior to the incident. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a contract with the dialysis provider for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#83) reviewed for dialysis services. This placed the resident at risk for unmet needs. Findings Include: Resident 83 was admitted to the facility in 1/2023 with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis. Resident 83 received dialysis three days each week. On 1/27/23 at 3:27 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed the facility did not have a contract with the dialysis clinic that served Resident 83. She stated the facility had no contracts with any other dialysis facilities and would need to develop those for future needs.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical service to ensure accurate acquiring, receiving and dispensing of medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 8 and 30) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and a pelvic fracture. a. A physician order start date on 11/2/22 directed staff to administer Tylenol two tablets three times daily for pain. The 12/2022 MAR revealed the following: -12/31/22 at 9:22 AM and 2:06 PM Tylenol was not available. b. A physician order start date on 1/3/23, (a new order was placed approximately every seven days) 1/7/23, 1/14/23 and 1/21/23 directed staff to apply miconazole (antifungal medication) cream twice daily following perineal care. Ensure groin area was thoroughly dried prior to application of miconazole to her/his groin area bilaterally for Resident 8's rash. The 1/2023 MAR revealed the following: -1/3/23 at 9:25 AM indicated not administered at 8:26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days unless deemed appropriate by the attending physician for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#23) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications and adverse side effects. Findings include: Resident 23 admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including stroke and anxiety. A physician order start date of 11/27/22 directed staff to administer prochlorperazine (anti-anxiety and used to control severe nausea and vomiting) PRN for nausea. A Pharmacist Consult Report dated 12/8/22 and 1/25/23 revealed prochlorperazine was an antipsychotic and required a 14-day review/renewal. The 12/23/22 MAR revealed Resident 23 was administered prochlorperazine for nausea. A review of Resident 23's revealed no written rationale or indication of ongoing use of the prochlorperazine by her/his physician after the 11/27/22 start date (58 days). On 1/26/23 at 03:05 PM Staff 9 (Pharmacist) stated he completed monthly chart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-30 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain therapy services for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#23) reviewed for therapy services. This placed residents at risk for a decline in functional abilities. Findings include: Resident 23 re-admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including stroke and anxiety. A physician order on 12/29/22 directed staff to request an evaluation and treatment for OT and PT. A Communication Result Report (a fax document) dated 1/10/23 (12 days later) requested PT and OT from Staff 7 (Administrator Coordinator/Care Manager). On 1/23/23 at 12:15 PM Resident 23 stated she/he was frustrated because she/he was not working with therapy services. On 1/26/23 at 10:18 AM Staff 8 (RN) stated Resident 23 was upset because she/he was not provided PT or OT. Staff 8 stated he reported his concerns to Staff 7 and she thought it would be a good idea to initiate therapy services. On 1/26/23 at 11:04 AM Staff 7 acknowledged Resident 23 requested PT and OT in 12/2022 and the physician initiated the orders. Staff 7 stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$13,286 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $13,286 — penalty dated 2023-12-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 38A001. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next