Robison Jewish Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 93.0 residents a day — about 101% occupied, or roughly -1 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.51 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a Stage 2 pressure ulcer was identified, assessed, treated and monitored upon admission to the facility for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. As a result, Resident 1 experienced significant damage to her/his penis, which was unrepairable and resulted in the resident no longer being able to urinate from her/his penis. Findings include:Resident 1 admitted to the facility on 8/2025 with diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, a foley catheter, and a Stage 2 pressure ulcer located on the resident's penis.Per CMS, a Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer is defined as a partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed dermis, presenting as a shallow open ulcer. The wound bed is viable, pink or red, moist, and may also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Adipose (fat) is not visible and deeper tissues are not visible. Granulation tissue, slough and eschar are not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent a fall for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 20) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in Resident 20 having a fall with serious injury including a head hematoma (a pool of blood under the skin), a gluteal hematoma, multiple rib fractures and skin avulsions (skin tears) which required emergency medical services and treatment at the hospital. Findings include: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility 12/2020 with diagnoses including dementia and anxiety. Resident 20's 12/10/23 Annual MDS indicated Resident 20 was noted to have wandering behavior and was exit seeking. A 4/17/24 Behavior and Psychotropic Meeting Note indicated Resident 20 exhibited wandering behaviors. Resident 20's 6/11/24 Quarterly MDS revealed she/he had severe cognitive impairment. A 6/18/24 Care Plan indicated Resident 20 had a pattern of wandering. A 7/9/24 Facility Incident Report revealed Resident 20 had an unwitnessed exit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to safely transfer a resident with the use of a mechanical device for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#301) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in Resident 301 falling during a transfer and was hospitalized with a subdural hematoma (a pool of blood between the brain and its outermost covering). Findings include: Resident 301 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation. Resident 301's 11/7/22 Care Plan indicated the following: -The resident required assistance from two staff via a mechanical lift as necessary; and -The resident was on anticoagulant therapy (medicine to prevent blood clots). A 1/14/23 Progress Note revealed the resident slipped out of the sling connected to the mechanical lift and her/his head hit the floor. The resident sustained a bump to the back of her/his head as a result of the fall and was sent to the hospital. A review of the Resident 301's clinical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record record it was determined the facility failed to monitor for legionella in 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for infection from exposure to water borne pathogens. Findings include:The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program policy and procedure dated 10/1/25 indicated:- A water management program has been established as part of the overall infection prevention and control program, - Control measures and testing protocols are in place to address potential hazards associated with the facility's water systems, and- The Maintenance Director serves as the leader of the water management program. On 9/19/25 11:02 AM Staff 15 (Maintenance Technician) and Staff 39 (Maintenance Technician) stated that had not been trained on water borne pathogens and had not been instructed to monitor for legionella's presence in the facilities water system. On 9/19/25 at 11:13 AM Staff 40 (Maintenance Director) stated she was unaware of areas at risk for development of legionella in the facility and confirmed no monitoring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to receive, track and resolve resident and/or resident representative grievances for 1 of 1 sampled facility reviewed for Resident Council. This placed residents at risk for unreported and unresolved grievances. Findings include:The facility's Grievance policy revised in April 2017 stated the following:- Residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designed to hear grievances (e.g., the State Ombudsman).- The administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of the resident and/or representative. - The Administrator has delegated the responsibility of grievance and/or complaint investigation to the Grievance Officer who is the Social Services Coordinator.- Upon Receiving a grievance and complaint report, the Grievance Officer will begin an investigation into the allegations.- The Grievance Officer will record and maintain all grievances and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed, and failed to identify, assess, and treat a change in a resident's skin condition for 3 of 9 sampled residents (#s 19, 84 and 87) reviewed for unnecessary medications and skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication effects and untreated and worsening skin impairments. Findings include: 1.The facility's Medication Administration policy revised 10/1/24 stated the following:- Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by physician. Resident 84 was admitted to the facility in 8/2025 with diagnoses including Multiple Myeloma (a cancer of white blood cells). Resident 84's 8/11/25 admission MDS indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident 84's 8/2025 and 9/2025 MAR indicated the resident was to receive:- Venetoclax (a cancer medication) 100 mg, four tablets at 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM daily. Do not crush; swallow one whole at a time with applesauce. A time stamped Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were secured and only accessible to authorized persons for 1 of 4 Halls and 1 of 4 Households observed. This placed residents at risk for receiving unprescribed medications and drug diversion. Findings include: The facility's 10/2024 Medication Storage Policy revealed the following:-All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments, such as medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators and medication rooms.-Only authorized personnel will have access to the keys to locked compartments.-During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart. 1. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility in 8/2025 with diagnoses including Parkinsonism unspecified (a group of symptoms that are similar to Parkinson's disease but do not have a definitive underlying cause). Resident 31's 9/2025 Physician Orders directed the resident to receive carbidopa-levodopa…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-22 · tag F0825 — pattern
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide occupational and physical therapy services as ordered for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 11, 22 and 89) reviewed for rehabilitation services. This placed residents at risk for a decline in functional abilities and diminished quality of life. Findings include: The facility's Specialized Rehabilitative Services policy dated 10/2024 included the following: - The facility shall provide or obtain services from an outside resource for specialized rehabilitative services. These services will assist them in attaining, maintaining, or restoring their highest practicable level of physical, mental, functional, and psycho-social well-being. - Specialized rehabilitative services include but are not limited to physical therapy and occupational therapy. - Specialized rehabilitative services will be provided under the written order of a physician by qualified personnel. - Specialized rehabilitative services are considered a facility service and included within the scope of facility services. 1. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment with comfortable sound levels and exercise reasonable care for the protection of resident's property from loss for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 5 and 87) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for lack of a homelike environment, lost sleep and lost personal property. Findings include:1. The facility's 10/2024 Resident Personal Belongings Policy revealed the following: -The facility will exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft. -All resident possessions, regardless of their apparent value to others, will be treated with respect. Resident 87 was admitted to the facility in 6/2025 with diagnoses including Parkinsonism unspecified (a group of symptoms that are similar to Parkinson's disease but do not have a definitive underlying cause). Resident 87's 7/4/25 admission MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact. On 9/15/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for experiencing adverse side effects of medication. Findings include: The facility's 10/2024 Use of Psychotropic Medication(s) Policy revealed PRN orders for psychotropic medications, excluding antipsychotics (a class of drugs used to treat mental health conditions such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder), shall be limited to no more than 14 days, unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes it is appropriate to extend the order beyond the 14 days. The medical record should include documentation from the physician or prescriber for the rationale for the extended time period and indicate a specific duration. Resident 8 was readmitted to the facility in 6/2025 with diagnoses including hip fracture. Resident 8's 6/3/25 Physician Orders directed the resident to receive lorazepam (a medication used to relieve…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the state Long Term Care Ombudsman's office was notified of facility transfers or discharges for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 93, and 95) reviewed for hospitalization and discharge. This placed residents at risk for lack of advocacy. Findings include: 1. Resident 93 admitted to the facility in 7/2025 with diagnoses including aftercare following surgery and lower left leg cellulitis (bacterial infection of the skin).An 8/2/25 progress note indicated Resident 93 was transferred to the hospital for nausea and vomiting.A 9/22/25 review of Resident 93's medical chart did not reveal any notification to the LTCO's (Long Term Care Ombudsman) office regarding her/his transfer to the hospital.On 9/22/25 at 12:52 PM, Staff 2 (DNS) stated she was unaware who oversaw the notification to the LTCO's office for resident transfers.On 9/22/25 at 2:07 PM, Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she was unaware notifying the LTCO was a requirement for resident transfers.2. Resident 95 admitted to the facility in 6/2025 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decreases in range of motion for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#49) reviewed for position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for worsening contractures (a permanent tightening of the muscle, tendons and skin causing the joint to shorten and stiffen) and conditions. Findings include:Resident 49 was admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (a condition that causes paralysis or severe weakness on one side of the body). Resident 49's 7/2/25 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and experienced upper extremity impairment on one side of her/his body.Resident 49's 7/23/25 Care Plan indicated the resident experienced contractures in her/his third, fourth and fifth fingers on her/his left hand and she/he was to work with RA to decrease the worsening of her/his contractures. Resident 49's 9/1/25 Physician Orders directed the following:-Staff were to place a contracture pillow…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined, the facility failed to provide assistance with bathing for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for bathing. This placed residents at risk of unmet care needs. Findings include:Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 5/2025, with a diagnosis including stroke. Resident 4 was unable to be observed or interviewed as she/he no longer resided in the facility.Resident 4's 5/19/25 care plan indicated Resident 4 required maximum assistance with a Hoyer (a mechanical device used to transfer residents with limited mobility) and was dependent on one staff for showering twice weekly and as necessary.A review of Resident 4's 6/2025, 7/2025, and 8/2025 Task Charting revealed on 6/6/25, 6/20/25, 6/26/25, 8/8/25, and 8/15/25, bathing was documented as NA.(not applicable) by Staff 24 (CNA), Staff 25 (CNA), and Staff 26 (CNA). There was no evidence that a make-up shower was provided.On 9/8/25 at 4:17 PM, Staff 25 stated she charted NA for bathing on 8/8/25 for Resident 4 because she wasn't able to find someone to help get Resident 4 up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$48,520 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $37,681 — penalty dated 2025-11-04
• $10,839 — penalty dated 2024-08-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR