The Creston Health & Rehabilitation
3320 SE Holgate Blvd, Portland, OR 97202 · Non profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (503) 231-1411 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Sep 2023
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $122,699 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-06)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (95%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.7% | 14.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.7% | 4.9% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.0% | 20.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.4% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.5% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 12.5% | 5.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.6% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.7% | 13.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.6% | 81.2% | 79.4% | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
62.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 62.0%CMS range 50.8–71.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 6.8–16.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.4–12.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.66 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 55.6 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 0.93 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 0.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 0.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 0.92 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 95% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
62 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' change of condition was assessed for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 38 and 89) reviewed for hospitalization and unnecessary medications. This failure, determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation, resulted in the delayed assessment of Resident 89 when she/he was experiencing a significant change in condition, resulting in delayed treatment. Resident 89 later died at the hospital. This placed all residents at risk for delayed assessments and treatments and constituted substandard quality of care. Findings include: Per National Library of Medicine online resource: Bleeding in the upper stomach and intestinal region carries a high morbidity (sudden onset of a health condition) and mortality (death) which can be lowered by timely evaluation and treatment. Signs of this condition include vomit which looked like coffee grounds. 1. Resident 89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of lung…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow care plan interventions to ensure safe transfers and prevent falls for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#'s 2, 48 and 74) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in resident 74 having a fall and sustaining an ankle fracture requiring emergency medical services. Findings include: The facility's undated Fall Prevention Program Policy revealed the following: -Each resident's risk factors and environmental hazards will be evaluated when developing the resident's comprehensive plan of care.-Interventions will be monitored for effectiveness, and the plan of care will be revised and needed. -When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will assess the resident, complete a post-fall assessment, complete an incident report, notify the physician and family, review the resident's care plan and update as indicated, document all assessments and actions and obtain witness statements in the case of injury. 1. Resident 74 was admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-10-15 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received timely specialized rehabilitative services (PT and OT services) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#20) reviewed for rehabilitation and restorative. This failure resulted in Resident 20 displaying a depressed mood, verbalizing feelings of frustration and a decline in physical functioning. Findings include: The facility's 1/2023 Therapy Evaluation Policy indicated the following: -The Rehabilitation Department was to be notified when a physician order was written for therapy evaluation and treatment. -The licensed therapist was to perform a chart review and initiate the evaluation. -The initial evaluation was to be completed within two to three days from the time the referral was written. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 9/2022 with diagnoses including a history of falls. A review of Resident 20's clinical record revealed she/he was hospitalized from [DATE] to 10/27/23 related to sepsis (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-07-30 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary with required information for wound care and possible wound infection for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 17) reviewed for unsafe discharge. The facility's failure to provide instructions for the care of the wound and the possible wound infection in the discharge summary information caused the resident's wound to worsen at home resulting in re-admission to a hospital. Findings include: Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including hip fracture with surgical repair, heart failure, and a history of falling. Resident 17's care plan dated 5/14/24 indicated the resident required frequent skin inspections. Staff were to observe for redness, open areas, scratches, cuts, bruises, and report changes. Resident 17 was also at risk for developing pressure injuries and new skin issues related to her/his right hip fracture from a ground level fall. A hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] directed the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were implemented in a timely manner for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 5 and 6), reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for a delay in treatment and recovery. Findings include:1. Resident 5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including an opened wound to his/her left foot and decreased white blood cell count.Resident 5's Progress Notes documented:-On 6/5/26 at 5:59 AM, Resident 5 complained of pain and burning upon urination.-On 6/8/26, a urinalysis was collected from Resident 5.-On 6/10/25, Resident 5 continued to complain of pain and burning with urination, had an active UTI and results of a culture and sensitivity were pending.On 6/15/26 at 12:15 PM, Resident 5 stated she/he first notified the facility of their UTI symptoms about two weeks prior. Resident 5 explained the facility completed a UA about one week prior which was positive and thought she/he would have an antibiotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure overbed lights were accessible, call lights were within reach and bed preferences were honored for 5 of 6 sampled residents (#s 21, 40, 48, 49 and 53) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This placed residents at risk for lack of independence. Findings include: The facility's undated Accommodation of Needs Policy indicated: -The facility will treat each resident with respect and dignity and will evaluate and make reasonable accommodations for the individual needs and preferences of a resident, expect when the health and safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered. -The facility will make reasonable accommodations to individualize the resident's physical environment including their personal bathroom, bedroom, and common living areas within the facility. -Facility staff shall make efforts to reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of the resident as they make use of their physical environment. -Based on individual needs and preferences, the facility will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to transmit resident assessments in the required timeframe for 7 of 8 sampled residents (#s 15, 78, 79, 80, 82, 83 and 84) reviewed for late assessments. This placed at risk for untimely assessments, delayed and inaccurate care. Findings include:1. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with a diagnosis of a right leg fracture.Resident 15's health record revealed she/he was discharged from the facility on [DATE].No evidence was found in Resident 15's health record to indicate the facility transmitted her/his 5-day or Discharge MDS assessments.On [DATE] at 4:13 PM Staff 8 (Medical Records) acknowledged Resident 15's missing Medicare 5-day and Discharge MDS assessments and stated she failed to verify their transmittal status after submitting them.On [DATE] at 1:47 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated MDS assessments were important because they provided information for the development of resident-centered care plans. Staff 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff annual performance reviews were completed for 5 of 5 sampled CNA staff (#s 5, 10, 11, 12, and 13) reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of competent staff. Findings include:A review of personnel records on 2/26/26 indicated the following employees had not received their annual performance evaluations:-Staff 5 (CNA), hired date was 6/1989 and a performance review was not completed.-Staff 10 (CNA), hired date was 12/2024 and a performance review was not completed.-Staff 11 (CNA), hired date was 5/2024 and a performance review was not completed.-Staff 12 (CNA), hired date was 12/2022 and a performance review was not completed.-Staff 13 (CNA), hired date was 7/2002 and a performance review was not completed.On 2/26/26 at 2:59 PM Staff 29 (HR Assistant) stated she was unable to locate the most recent annual performance reviews for Staff 5, Staff 10, Staff 11, Staff 12, and Staff 13 and was unsure if they were completed for Staff 5, Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to post accurate and complete staffing information for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for required staff postings. This placed residents and the public at risk for incomplete and inaccurate staffing information. Findings include:A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports (DCSDR) from 1/23/26 through 2/23/26 revealed 11 of 30 days when portions of the form were left blank or were inaccurate. The incomplete or inaccurate information included daily census and the number of working staff. The dates included:-1/28/26 -2/4/26 -2/5/26 -2/6/26 -2/9/26 -2/10/26 -2/11/26 -2/14/26 -2/18/26 -2/19/26 -2/20/26 On 2/27/26 at 9:11 AM Staff 15 (Staffing Coordinator) stated the lead CNAs were trained to fill in the DCSDRs and a nurse reviewed and signed the report before it was posted for each shift. Staff 15 acknowledged the DCSDRs were incomplete and inaccurate for the identified dates. On 2/27/2026 at 12:30 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) expected the posted DCSDRs were accurate for each shift.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were properly secured, stored, labeled and expired medications were removed from the cart for 3 of 6 sampled medications carts reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for misappropriation and reduced medication efficacy. Findings include: The facility's 4/2025 Medication Storage Policy revealed the following: -All drugs and biologicals were to be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medications rooms) under proper temperature controls. -Refrigerated products were to be maintained at temperatures between 36 degrees F and 46 degrees F.-Unused medications that were outdated were to be destroyed. 1. The 2013 insulin lispro (HumaLOG) Kwikpen manufacturer instructions for storage and handling indicated unopened insulin pens should be stored in the refrigerator between 36 degrees F and 46 degrees F, and once opened, the pens should be discarded after 28 days. The 2018 insulin Humulin 70/30 Kwikpen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide SNF ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage) notifications to 1 of 3 sampled residents (#60) reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. This placed residents and their representatives at risk for unknown financial liabilities. Findings include:Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Medicare A benefits.A 2/2/26 NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) indicated Resident 60's Medicare Part A benefits ended on 2/4/26.Review of Resident 60's health record indicated the resident remained in the facility and was financially responsible for her/his care from 2/5/26 to 2/26/26. There was no documentation indicating the SNF ABN notification was provided to Resident 60 or their representative to inform them of the resident's daily out-of-pocket costs. On 2/24/26 at 2:27 PM Staff 9 (Social Services Director) acknowledged Resident 60 was not issued a SNF ABN. Staff 9 stated her expectation was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received dressing assistance for 1 of 4 residents (#48) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and loss of dignity. Findings include: The facility's 9/2024 Activities of Daily Living Policy revealed the following:-A resident who is unable to carry out, or dependent with, activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. -The facility will maintain individual objectives of the care plan and periodic review and evaluation. Resident 48 was admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a progressive movement disorder of the nervous system).Resident 48's 9/10/25 ADL Care Plan revealed the resident required assistance from one person with dressing.Resident 48's 1/25/26 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident experienced short-and-long term memory loss, was severely impaired for decision-making, dependent on assistance from staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activities program for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#48) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life. Findings include: The facility's Activities Policy revealed residents would be encouraged to participate in scheduled activities, and special considerations would be made for developing meaningful activities for residents with dementia and/or special needs. Resident 48 was admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a progressive movement disorder of the nervous system).Resident 48's 9/10/25 Activity Care Plan revealed the following:-The resident's preferred activities included visiting with family and friends, watching the Hallmark Channel and the morning and evening news on television, listening to rock and roll, classical, '70s and '80s music and playing bingo. -The resident would inform staff if she/he wanted to participate in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure treatment and services to maintain hearing abilities were provided for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for hearing. This placed residents at risk for social isolation and decreased quality of life. Findings include:The facility's 4/9/25 Hearing Services Policy revealed the following:-The facility was to ensure all residents had access to hearing services and received adaptive equipment as indicated. -The social worker/designee was responsible for assisting residents in locating and utilizing any available resources for the provision of hearing services. -Once the need for hearing services was identified, the social worker/designee was to assist the resident to make appointments and arrange for transportation. Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility in 1/2025 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure. A 2/19/25 Audiogram (a graph that plots hearing thresholds to determine the type, degree and configuration of an individual's hearing loss) recommended Resident 1 receive a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to assess and conduct weekly wound evaluations for pressure ulcer care for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at an increased risk for delayed healing and inadequate treatment. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 7/2024, with diagnoses including atherosclerosis of the arteries (build up of plaque in the arteries, narrowing them and reducing blood flow), diabetes, hypertension, chronic heart failure and atrial fibrillation. On 2/27/25 at 9:25 AM, 12:38 PM, and on 2/28/25 at 8:25 AM, Resident 2 was observed sitting in her/his electric wheelchair in her/his room or through the facility. Resident 2 was pleasant, alert and oriented with clear speech. On 2/28/25 at 10:32 AM, RN surveyor observed Resident 2's pressure ulcer located on her/his right buttock, ischial area (lower part of the pelvis) to be closed, smaller than the size of a penny, reddened area. Resident 2's 1/26/25 Weekly Skin Evaluation identified the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-15 · tag F0847 — widespreadInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were fully informed and understood the binding arbitration agreement for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for binding arbitration agreements. This placed residents at risk of being uninformed regarding their legal rights. Findings include: On 10/14/24 at 1:01 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated the facility offered a Mediation and Arbitration Clause to residents upon admission. Staff 1 stated he and Staff 5 (Bookkeeper) were responsible for the process of explaining the agreement to residents upon admission. On 10/14/24 at 1:06 PM Staff 5 stated she was responsible to provide residents with information related the facility's Mediation and Arbitration Clause. Staff 5 stated the information was part of the admission handbook, she did not explain the arbitration process to residents nor did she obtain signatures with dates. On 10/14/24 at 1:06 PM Staff 1 acknowledged the facility did not have a clear process for providing information regarding binding arbitration agreements to residents.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure community use CBG monitors were cleaned with an approved disinfectant for 3 of 6 sampled units (2, 2D and 1B) observed during medication administration and random observations, failed to implement EBP (enhanced barrier precautions: gloves and gowns worn during high contact for wounds and indwelling devices) timely for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for pressure ulcers, failed to transport linens in a sanitary manner, and failed to ensure a legionella water management plan for 1 of 1 facility. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination. Findings include: 1. On 10/8/24 at 8:34 AM Staff 15 (LPN) was observed to clean a community use CBG with an alcohol swab. Staff 15 was stopped prior to entering a resident's room to perform a CBG check. Staff 15 stated she used alcohol swabs to clean CBG machines and at times used bleach wipes. On 10/8/24 at 9:05 AM Staff 37 (LPN) sated she cleaned the community use CBG on the 1B hall with alcohol wipes. All residents with CBG orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dignified language was used to address residents and their equipment for 1 of 1 facility and 1 of 2 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for a decreased quality of life. Findings include: The Alzheimer's Association's Greater Missouri Chapter's 7/2017 Person Centered Care in Nursing Homes and Assisted Living revealed language is important in the change to person centered care. Language can either support change efforts or undermine them. Concepts of personalization and relationship-building cannot take root when a resident requiring assistance at mealtime is referred to as a feeder or when the act of walking is referred to as ambulation. Purposeful lives unfold in communities, not in facilities. The widely used language of long-term care continues to reflect an institutional orientation. Part of a change effort must be thoughtful consideration of the words and expressions used to describe the care provided and the way people and spaces are referred…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 1 of 1 resident (#340) reviewed for hospice and in 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for a lack of autonomy and living in an unkempt environment. Findings include: The facility's revised 7/3/23 Safe and Homelike Environment Policy directed staff in accordance with residents' rights, the facility would provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The facility would create and maintain, to the extent possible, a homelike environment that de-emphasizes the institutional character of the setting. 1. Resident 340 was admitted to the facility in 8/2024 with diagnoses including dementia. On 10/7/24 at 12:01 PM Resident 340 was observed in her/his room with no personalized items or decorations in the room. On 10/10/24 at 1:47 PM Resident 340 stated she/he would like something good to look at in her/his room. On 10/14/24 at 9:50 AM Staff 7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a bed hold policy was provided to a resident when transferred to the hospital for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 16 and 33) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge related to the right to return to the facility. Findings include: 1. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2/2020 with a diagnosis of diabetes. Progress Notes revealed Resident 16 was discharged to the hospital on 6/24/24. Resident 16's clinical record did not indicate Resident 16 was provided a facility bed hold policy. An 8/11/24 quarterly MDS revealed Resident 16 was cognitively intact. On 10/7/24 at 10:25 AM Resident 16 stated she/he did not recall staff providing her/him a bed hold policy when she/he went to the hospital. On 10/10/24 at 12:51 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated upon admission to the facility residents were provided a bed hold policy. Staff 2 stated usually the admission director provided a bed hold policy upon discharge, but currently there was no admission director. No additional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to accurately reflect the needs of residents for 4 of 13 sampled residents (#s 5, 7, 35, and 73) reviewed for accidents, pressure ulcers, position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 4/2024 with a diagnosis of paralysis. A 7/17/24 Pressure Injury investigation revealed a new DTI (Deep tissue injury: damage to the soft tissue beneath the skin caused by pressure or shear. Often appears as a dark purple or maroon area) to the inner knee. The cause of the injury was determined to be from her/his bedside table putting pressure on the knee. Resident 5's care plan was not updated to direct staff to monitor pressure on Resident 5's leg from the bedside table. On 10/11/24 at 9:11 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated Resident 5 did not have sensation in her/his legs. When the wound nurse performed wound care to the resident's sacral region she found the inner knee DTI. The wound nurse identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support individual activity interests and preferences for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 38, 51, 53 and 340) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for isolation, lack of social interaction and engagement. Findings include: The facility's 2023 Activities Policy indicated the facility was to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan and preferences. Facility-sponsored group, individual and independent activities were designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Special considerations would be made for developing meaningful activities for residents with dementia and/or special needs. 1. Resident 51 was admitted to the facility in 6/2024 with diagnoses including dementia. Resident 51's 7/1/24 Activity Care Plan revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided restorative services and a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decreases in range of motion for 4 of 10 sampled residents (#s 5, 7, 16 and 50) reviewed for ADLs and mobility. This placed residents at risk for decrease in range of motion and worsening contractures. Findings include: 1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 4/2024 with a diagnosis of paralysis. A 6/5/24 Therapy RA Referral form revealed staff were to assist Resident 5 with exercises three times a week. Exercises included weights for upper body strength and edge of bed exercises. A 7/28/24 quarterly MDS revealed Resident 5 was cognitively intact. On 10/10/24 at 11:49 AM Resident 5 stated she/he was no longer getting therapy and was weaker. On 10/10/24 at 8:11 AM Staff 36 (RA) stated Resident 5 was just restarted on therapy on 10/8/24. Staff 36 stated initially Resident 5 was not able to sit at the edge of the bed because she/he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. The facility administration error rate was 19.23% with 5 errors in 26 opportunities. This placed residents at risk for an ineffective medication regimen. Findings include: Resident 343 was admitted to the facility in10/2024 with a diagnosis of heart disease. Epocrates Online (web based pharmacy resource) revealed levothyroxine (hormone replacement)should be taken 15 to 60 minutes before breakfast with a full glass of water at the same time daily. It also indicated the following drug to drug interactions: -levothyroxine and metformin (treats diabetes): deceases antidiabetic agent. -levothyroxine and metoprolol (treats high blood pressure) may decrease antihypertensive. -levothyroxine and sucubitril (treats heart failure and high blood pressure) may decrease antihypertensive. -levothyroxine and omeprazole (treats acid reflux) may decrease thyroid hormone levels. A current Order Summary Report revealed Resident 343 was to be administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were secured and accessible only to authorized personnel for 5 of 6 halls (1B, 1C, 1D, 2C and 2D) observed for secure medication and treatment carts. This placed residents at risk for misappropriation of medications and adverse medication consequences. Findings include: 1. On 10/8/24 the following occurred: -8:02 AM a treatment cart on 1D was observed to be unlocked, a CNA walked by the cart but did not lock the cart. -8:07 AM Staff 15 (LPN) locked the cart. Staff 15 stated she was not responsible for the the treatment cart which was unlocked and it was the night shift cart. Staff 15 stated the cart contained medicated creams and should be locked. 2. On 10/10/24 at 5:40 PM a medication cart located on the 1B hall was observed to be unlocked with no staff within sight of the cart. Staff 17 (Social Services Director) indicated the cart was to be locked and she informed a nurse who was in a resident's room. 3. On 10/8/24 at 3:53 PM a treatment cart was observed to be unlocked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled and stored to ensure proper food storage practices were followed in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: Review of the US FDA 2022 Food Code revealed: -food prepared and held cold must be clearly marked with date prepared or by day which the food shall be consumed or discarded. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 10/7/24 at 9:40 AM Staff 39 (Dietary Manager) verified and threw away the following undated and unlabeled items: Reach-in refrigerator: -A gyro sandwich wrapped in foil; -Prune juice poured into multiple glasses; -Three green salads. Walk-in refrigerator: -An opened container of chicken stock base; -Olives stored in a plastic container; -Cut tomatoes in a plastic container partially covered with plastic wrap; -Shredded carts stored in a plastic container. On 10/7/24 at 9:54 AM Staff 39 stated he expected all items in the refrigerators to be labeled, dated and covered, especially the opened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain consents for the use of psychotropic medications for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 1 and 77) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for the loss of the right to decline the use of psychotropic medications. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with a diagnosis of severe malnutrition. An 8/26/24 quarterly MDS revealed Resident 1 was cognitively intact. A 10/2024 MAR revealed Resident 1 was administered the following psychotropic medications: -Sertraline (antidepressant) with a start date of 5/24/24. -Trazodone (antidepressant also used to assist with sleep) with a start date of 5/24/24. Resident 1's clinical record did not include consents for the use of the psychotropic medications. On 10/10/24 at 12:38 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated social services was to obtain consents for psychotropic medications. Staff 2 acknowledged consents were not completed for Resident 1's psychotropic medications. 2. Resident 77 was admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to honor a resident's preference for room layout for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#16) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for depression. Findings include: 1. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2/2020 with a diagnosis of diabetes. A 2/29/24 annual MDS revealed Resident 16 was cognitively intact, had weakness, and was in the facility for long term care. On 10/10/24 at 9:08 AM and 10/10/24 at 11:55 AM Resident 16 was observed in her/his room, a transfer pole was positioned on the left side of her/his bed, and Resident 16's spouse was observed in the bed to the right of the transfer pole. Resident 16 stated she/he was in a significant relationship with her/his spouse for 36 years. Resident 16 stated she/he wished the two beds were closer together to allow her/him to hold hands with her/his spouse. Resident 16 also stated she/he had PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder) and her/his spouse was able to calm her/him when she/he woke with vivid dreams. Resident 16 stated she/he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents had an advance directive for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 1 and 16) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for end-of-life choices not being honored. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with a diagnosis of severe malnutrition. An 8/26/24 quarterly MDS revealed Resident 1 was cognitively intact. An 8/29/24 Care Conference Meeting form revealed Resident 1 did not have an advance directive. The form did not indicate if staff provided Resident 1 information related to an advance directive or if the resident wanted to fill out an advance directive. On 10/10/24 at 11:38 AM Resident 1 stated she/he used to have an advance directive but did not know where it was and did not recall if the facility talked to her/him about an advance directive. Resident 1 also stated she/he definitely would not want tube feedings. On 10/10/24 at 9:11 AM Staff 9 (Social Services Coordinator) stated advance directive information was reviewed during care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's emergency contact was notified of a resident's hospitalization for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#16) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents' representatives at risk for not being informed of a resident's change in medical condition. Finding include: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2/2020 with a diagnosis of diabetes. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility 2/2020 with a diagnosis of dementia. An undated admission Record revealed Resident 13 was Resident 16's first emergency contact and Witness 1 (Acquaintance) was Resident 16's second emergency contact. An 8/4/24 quarterly MDS revealed Resident 13 was cognitively impaired. An 8/11/24 quarterly MDS revealed Resident 16 was cognitively intact. Progress Notes revealed on 6/24/24 Resident 16 vomited, was pale, clammy, and did her/his mental status was not at baseline. Resident 16 was transported to the local hospital for evaluation and treatment. There was no note to indicate Resident 16's first or second emergency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) notifications were provided to 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 75 and 290) and failed to provide SNF ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage) notifications to 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 49 and 75) reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. This placed residents and their representatives at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to appeal and unknown financial liabilities. Findings include: 1. Resident 75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Medicare Part A benefits. Resident 75's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review provided by the facility indicated the resident's last covered day for Medicare Part A services was 5/27/24 and Resident 75 remained in the facility. According to the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification form, the resident did not receive the required NOMNC notification to notify the resident or their representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to resolve resident grievances promptly for 1 of 1 resident (#57) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for unresolved grievances. Findings include: Resident 57 was admitted to the facility in 5/2022 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease) and lower back pain. On 10/7/24 at 4:22 PM Resident 57 expressed she/he had concerns with her/his caregiver the other day. Resident 57 stated she/he told Staff 19 (RN) and Staff 38 (LPN) about her/his concerns and requested a grievance form be completed. On 10/9/24 at 8:23 AM Staff 1 (Interim Administrator) was unaware of Resident 57's concerns about the caregiver and at 9:51 AM Staff 1 confirmed a grievance form was not created for Resident 57's expressed concerns. On 10/9/24 at 11:03 AM Staff 19 confirmed Resident 57 spoke to her about her/his concerns regarding the caregiver on 10/7/24 and she told Staff 17 (Social Services Director) to complete a grievance form. On 10/14/24 at 5:43 AM Staff 38…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess residents for communication, dental, and transfers for 3 of 9 sampled residents (#s 1, 14 and 20) reviewed for communication, dental, and rehabilitation. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessments and unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 10/2024 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual directed the following: -A resident who was able to express requests and ideas clearly should be assessed as understood. -A resident who experienced difficulty communicating some words or finishing thoughts but was able to be understood if prompted or given time, experienced delayed responses or required some prompting to make self understood should be assessed usually understood. -A resident who was able to clearly comprehend the speaker's message and demonstrated comprehension by words or actions/behaviors should be assessed as understands. -A resident who missed some part or intent of the speaker's message but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services in the area of communication for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#53) reviewed for communication. This placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life and potential decline in their ability to carry out activities of daily living. Findings include: Resident 53 was admitted to the facility in 7/2021 with diagnoses including dementia. Resident 53's 9/22/24 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and her/his ability to hear was highly impaired. Resident 53's 10/1/24 Communication Problem Care Plan revealed the following: -Use a dry erase board as needed to facilitate communication and understanding. -Use alternative communication tools as needed, such as a communication book/board, writing pad, gestures, signs and pictures. -9/15/21: The resident was not a candidate for hearing aids per family report. On 10/7/24 at 12:37 PM Resident 53 was observed in her/his room in bed. Resident 53 stated she/he was a little bit deaf and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#51) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for poor personal hygiene. Findings include: Resident 51 was admitted to the facility in 6/2024 with a dignoses including dementia. Resident 51's 9/15/24 Quarterly MDS indicated her/his cognition was moderately impaired and she/he required assistance or supervision with personal hygiene. Resident 51 was observed from 10/7/24 at 1:30 PM to 10/11/24 at 12:08 PM with a significant amount of chin hairs. On 10/9/24 at 8:37 AM Resident 51 stated she/he did not want chin hairs and needed help to shave them. The 10/11/24 [NAME] (bedside care plan) directed staff to shave Resident 51 as necessary. On 10/11/24 at 9:57 AM Staff 43 (CNA) stated she obtained information to care for Resident 51 from the [NAME]. On 10/11/24 at 11:30 AM Staff 28 (LPN) confirmed Resident 51 had long chin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accident hazards for 3 of 6 sampled residents (#s 6, 50 and 60) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for falls and adverse medication consequences. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility 12/2022 with a diagnosis of diabetes. A care plan revised on 6/8/24 revealed Resident 6 was to be transferred by two staff. A 9/29/24 quarterly MDS revealed Resident 6 was cognitively intact. On 9/18/24 Witness 2 (Complainant) reported facility staff was observed to transfer Resident 6 with one staff and not two. It was reported Resident 16 was fearful during the transfer but did not fall. On 10/8/24 at 10:42 AM Witness 2 stated on 9/18/24 Witness 3 (Community Nurse) was entering Resident 6's room and a CNA who was already in the room was transferring Resident 6 with a mechanical device and no additional staff were in the room. On 10/8/24 at 8:11 PM Staff 31 (CNA) stated she recalled a day when she transferred Resident 6, the resident's legs became weak…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide treatment and services to correct ongoing signs of depressive behavior for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#20) reviewed for behaviors. This placed residents at risk for not maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 9/2022 with diagnoses including depression and adjustment disorder (a group of symptoms, such as stress, anxiety, feeling sad or hopeless, and physical symptoms that can occur after you go through a stressful life event). A review of Resident 20's Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9, a nine-item diagnostic tool used to assess for the presence and severity of depressive symptoms and a possible depressive disorder in adult patients in primary care settings) from 3/2024 through 9/2024 revealed the following: -On 3/10/24 the resident scored a 3, indicating she/he felt little interest or pleasure in doing things nearly every day. This score indicated minimal depression. -On 6/9/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain and provide routine medication for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 33 and 49) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for not receiving prescribed medications. Findings include: 1. Resident 33 was admitted to the facility in 12/2021 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition in which the body does not have enough oxygen in the blood). a. Resident 33's 9/17/24 Physician Order indicated the resident was prescribed Vitamin B12, one time a day due to a vitamin deficiency. Resident 33's 9/2024 MAR indicated Vitamin B12 was not available on 9/18/24, 9/19/24, 9/20/24, 9/21/24, 9/22/24 and 9/23/24 which resulted in the resident not receiving the medication. On 10/10/24 at 12:50 PM Staff 19 (RN) reviewed Resident 33's MAR and stated when medications were not available, the charge nurse should be notified. Staff 19 stated Resident 33 went too many days without her/his Vitamin B12 and that's a problem. Staff 19 stated she was unaware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was monitored for side effects of antidepressants for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for an adverse medication regimen. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with a diagnosis of severe malnutrition. Resident 1's 10/2024 MAR revealed Resident 1 was administered trazodone (antidepressant which can also help with sleep) daily with a start date of 5/24/24 and sertraline (antidepressant) daily with a start date of 5/24/24. A care plan initiated 5/31/24 revealed Resident 1 was administered antidepressants and potential side effects included drowsiness, suicidal thoughts, confusion, and increased falls. Review of Resident 1's clinical record did not indicate staff monitored her/him for psychotropic medication side effects. On 10/10/24 at 12:38 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated staff were to document psychotropic medication side effect monitoring on the MARs. Staff 2 acknowledged staff did not monitor Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a follow-up dental exam was scheduled for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#16) reviewed for dental. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment. Findings include: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2/2020 with a diagnosis of diabetes. A 7/23/24 Progress Note indicated all of Resident 16's teeth were extracted. An 8/11/24 quarterly MDS revealed Resident 16 was cognitively intact. An 10/2024 Upcoming Appointment Requests list revealed Resident 16 was not on the list to be seen by a dentist. On 10/7/24 Resident 16 stated her/his teeth were pulled a few months prior, there were no follow-up appointments made and she/he wanted dentures. On 10/11/24 at 9:53 AM and 10/11/24 at 10:20 AM Staff 17 (Social Services Director) stated a dentist came to the facility two to three times a year. Staff 17 stated after teeth were pulled a resident's gums healing time varied from resident to resident and a resident needed to to be examined to determine if denture fitting was appropriate. Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders and provide correct oxygen administration for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#12) reviewed for physician orders. This placed residents at risk for improper oxygen administration. Findings include: Resident 12 admitted to the facility in 8/2020 with diagnoses including diabetes and kidney disease. 1. The 3/26/24 Hospital After Visit Summary revealed an order to increase Resident 12's oxygen via nasal cannula to 3/lpm (liters per minute). The March 2024 TARS revealed the following dates and shifts when oxygen was administered incorrectly: -3/26/24 night shift - 2/lpm -3/30/24 day, evening and night shift - 4/lpm -3/31/24 day and evening - 4/lpm On 7/23/24 at 12:15 PM Staff 15 (LPN Resident Care Manager) verified Resident 12's oxygen administration orders were not followed on 3/26/24, 3/30/24 and 3/31/24. 2. The RN Educator website instructed a (regular) oxygen face mask was used for oxygen flow rates from 6 - 12/lpm. A minimum of 6/lpm of oxygen flow was needed to prevent re-breathing of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff possessed the competencies and skill sets necessary related to oxygen administration for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#12) reviewed for physician orders. This placed all residents at risk for unsafe oxygen administration. Findings include: The RN Educator website instructed a (regular) oxygen face mask was used for oxygen flow rates from 6 - 12/lpm (liters per minute). A minimum of 6/lpm of oxygen flow was needed to prevent the rebreathing of exhaled carbon dioxide. Resident 12 admitted to the facility in 8/2020 with diagnoses of diabetes and kidney disease. Resident 12's 3/26/24 Progress Note revealed she/he complained of difficulty breathing, her/his O2 sat was 88% - 92% (normal range is 95% - 100%), and the resident's oxygen was increased to 3/lpm via face mask. The 4/10/24 Progress Notes revealed the following: -2:44 PM: The previous shift placed Resident 12 on oxygen at 3/lpm via face mask. -2:44 PM: The oxygen flow rate was increased to 4/lpm via face mask. -3:37 PM:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure wheelchairs were clean and sanitary for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#13) reviewed for equipment. This placed residents at risk for unclean wheelchairs. Findings include: Resident 13 admitted to the facility in 11/2019 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (disease which deteriorates the brain and spinal cord) and paraplegia (lower body paralysis). On 7/22/24 at 10:59 AM Resident 13's wheelchair was observed to have crumbs on the bottom cushion and small (approximately 1 inch by 1 inch) brown smudge marks to the bottom cushion and the inside of the left armrest. On 7/24/24 at 10:46 AM Resident 13's wheelchair was observed to have crumbs and a small brown smudge (approximately 1 inch by 1 inch) on the bottom cushion. On 7/26/24 at 12:30 PM Resident 13's wheelchair was observed to be dirty with crumbs on the bottom cushion. [The wheelchair did not appear to be cleaned as documented in the July 2024 TARS.] Resident 13's July 2024 TARS revealed her/his wheelchair was to be cleaned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-18 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement a Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program which identified quality deficiencies, developed and implemented action plans to correct identified quality of care deficiencies. The facility failed to initiate a QA review related to staffing despite multiple concerns relayed to management by staff and residents and failed to respond to complaints and grievances filed by residents related to staffing shortages for 8/2023. This placed all residents at risk of not receiving the care and services for optimal resident outcomes. Findings include: The facility's QAPI policy and procedure, created in 2017 and reviewed 3/2022, stated the facility's QAPI plan would ensure a systematic, comprehensive, data-driven approach to care in order to prevent adverse events, reduce risk to residents and caregivers, promote safety and quality of care, and support each individual's choices and self identified quality of life. The QAPI plan is ongoing and comprehensive, dealing with the full range of services and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect. The facility failed to ensure residents received basic care for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 200, 300, 500, and 700) reviewed for ADL's. This neglect was due to the failure of the facility to provide adequate staffing which resulted in long call light times, lack of timely incontinence care and showers not completed on scheduled days. This failure placed all residents at risk for neglect of care. Findings include: According the the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Sec. 483.5, Neglect means the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. 1. ADL AND INCONTINENCE CARE a. Resident 200 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hip fracture and Parkinson's Disease. Resident 200's admission MDS dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of personal property for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 400 and 800) reviewed for misappropriation of property. This placed residents at risk for theft. Findlings include: 1. Resident 800 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including amputation of the left leg below the knee and anxiety disorder. Resident 800's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed she/he was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. On 8/28/23 the facility reported to the State Agency Resident 800 reported her/his credit/debit card had been stolen 7/2023. The resident initially thought the card was accidentally thrown away but subsequently learned charges were made to the card that she/he had not authorized. The facility initiated an investigation and made a referral to law enforcement. On 9/8/23 at 4:06 PM, Resident 800 confirmed the card was taken from her/his room in July 2023 when she/he left the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide ADL care to 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 200, 300, 500 and 700) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: a. Resident 200 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hip fracture and Parkinson's Disease. Resident 200's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed no cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 13. The MDS functional status section revealed the resident required extensive assistance with most ADLs, including assistance with showers. On 9/8/23 at 9:43 AM Witness 1 (Complainant) stated Resident 200 did not receive showers for several days after she/he was admitted due to the facility's staffing issues. Resident 200's bathing/shower logs were reviewed and no showers were documented from 7/21/23 through 8/3/23. On 9/18/23 at 3:30 PM, Staff 3 (RNCM) confirmed the facility had staffing issues and the bathing/shower logs reflected no showers were given to Resident 200. b.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident care needs for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for sufficient and competent staffing. This placed residents at risk for delayed and unmet care needs. Findings include: 1 a. Resident 200 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hip fracture and Parkinson's Disease. Resident 200's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed no cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 13. The MDS functional status section revealed the resident required extensive assistance with most ADLs, including assistance with showers. On 9/8/23 at 9:43 AM Witness 1 (Complainant) stated Resident 200 did not receive showers for several days after she/he was admitted due to the facility's staffing issues. Resident 200's bathing/shower logs were reviewed and no showers were documented from 7/21/23 through 8/3/23. On 9/18/23 at 3:30 PM, Staff 3 (RNCM) confirmed the facility had staffing issues and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure Staff 9 (Agency CNA) met professional standards of care for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#500) reviewed for incidents. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: OAR [PHONE NUMBER] Conduct Unbecoming a Nursing Assistant: A CNA, regardless of job location, responsibilities, of use of the title CNA, whose behavior fails to conform to the legal standard and accepted standards of the nursing assistant profession, or who may adversely affect the health, safety of welfare of the public, may be found guilty of conduct unbecoming a nursing assistant. Such conduct includes but is not limited to: (1) Conduct, regardless of setting, related to general fitness to perform nursing assistant authorized duties: (a) Demonstrated incidents of violent, abusive, neglectful or reckless behavior; (2) Conduct related to acheiving and maintaining clinical competency: (a) Failing to conform to the essential standards of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#200) reviewed for physician orders. This placed residents at risk for lack of medical care. Findings include: 1. Resident 200 admitted to the facility 7/2023 with diagnoses including hip fracture and Parkinson's Disease. Resident 200's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed no cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 13. On 9/8/23 at 9:43 AM Witness 1 (Complainant) stated a few weeks into her/his stay, Resident 200 told him she/he had neck and spinal pain and wanted x-rays. Witness 1 stated he contacted the facility and requested the x-rays be completed. However, the facility did not provide the x-rays and Resident 200 used an outside provider to get the x-rays completed. Resident 200 was not interviewed due to discharge. Clincial records reviewed indicated a secure conversation note written by Staff 3 (RNCM) on 8/7/23 at 3:58 PM to the facility's provider which requested an order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain comfortable sound levels for 1 of 1 facility observed for environment. This placed residents at risk for an uncomfortable environment. Findings include: Resident 51 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including major depression and borderline personality disorder. On 6/13/22 at 10:05 AM Resident 328 (Former resident) reported in the two months prior to 6/13/22, Resident 51 yelled and screamed throughout the day and night. Resident 328 stated Resident 51's constant yelling caused her/him migraine headaches and disrupted family visits. Resident 328 stated she/he spoke to several staff members who acknowledged her/his concerns and informed her/him there was not much they could do. Multiple observations from 6/26/23 through 6/30/23 between the hours of 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM revealed Resident 51 intermittently yelled at different times of the day. Resident 51's voice was audible throughout the first floor, on the second floor and outside of the facility. On 6/27/23 at 2:08 PM Staff 24 (CNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for self-administration of medications and a physician order was in place for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#6) observed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication-related consequences. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 11/2021 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease). Resident 6's 6/1/23 physician orders included the following: - fluticasone propionate suspension 50 mcg, two sprays in each nostril two times a day, to be administered by CMA/Licensed Nurse to ensure adherence. Resident 6's 6/2023 MAR indicated the following: - fluticasone propionate suspension 50 mcg, two sprays in each nostril two times a day, to be administered by CMA/Licensed Nurse to ensure adherence. Resident 6's health record revealed no physician order and no medication self-administration assessment which indicated the resident was able to safely store and self-administer medications. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a call light was readily accessible for 1 of 1 resident (#1) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This placed the resident at risk for delayed staff assistance. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including dementia, history of traumatic brain injury, generalized weakness. According to the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] and the most recent Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] Resident 1 required extensive assistance for bed mobility. The resident's care plan updated on 5/20/23 under Falls section included the following intervention: Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. Observations on 6/27/23 at 9:46 AM revealed Resident 1 in bed with the head of bed near 40 degrees. Resident 1 was observed to have difficulty reaching items on her/his tray table. Resident 1 asked the surveyor for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were coded accurately for 3 of 7 sampled residents (#s 2, 18 and 35) reviewed for food and unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessments. Findings include: 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including heart failure. Resident 2's 4/2/23 Quarterly MDS indicated no therapeutic diet or altered food texture. Resident 2's 6/2023 physician orders included the following: - Diabetic 2GM sodium diet, mechanical soft texture. On 6/29/23 at 10:52 AM Staff 22 (LPN Resident Care Coordinator) stated Resident 2 had a therapeutic diet with altered food texture and confirmed the 4/2/23 Quarterly MDS was not coded accurately. 2. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder. Resident 35's 4/23/23 Significant Change MDS indicated the resident did not receive antipsychotic medication. Resident 35's 4/2023 physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement the care plan related to positioning in bed for meals for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for loss of independence, safety and comfort with eating. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to facility in 8/2022 with diagnoses of GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease), dementia and weakness. The resident's Comprehensive Care Plan dated 8/14/2023 included a problem statement related to the resident's diagnosis of GERD. Interventions included to keep the head of Resident 1's bed upright during and for an hour after meals. Resident 1 was to have her/his food cut up into bite-size pieces and was to receive assistance with meals as needed. According to the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] and the most recent Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] Resident 1 required extensive assistance of one staff person for bed mobility and set-up assistance for eating. On 6/26/23 at 10:39 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide ADL care to dependent residents for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 8 and 19) reviewed for ADL care. This placed residents at risk for unmet hygiene needs. Findings include: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including diabetes. Resident 19's 11/9/22 ADL Care Plan indicated Resident 19 required assistance of one staff for showering twice weekly and as necessary. Staff were to follow the facility's protocol for shower refusals and Resident 19 preferred showers during scheduled shower days. Resident 19's 5/21/23 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact and bathing did not occur. Resident 19's 5/1/23 through 6/26/23 bathing task logs indicated the resident received a bed bath or shower on the following days: -6/2, 6/7, 6/12, 6/14, 6/21 and 6/26. A review of Resident 19's Progress Notes from 5/1/23 through 6/26/23 revealed no documentation Resident 20 was provided with additional bathing opportunities when bathing was not provided. On 6/26/23 at 10:56 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide support for a resident's choice of independent activities for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#34) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for unmet psychosocial needs and isolation. Findings include: Resident 34 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including severe morbid obesity and [NAME]-Danlos syndrome (A disorder which affects connective tissue, primarily the skin, joints and blood vessel walls.) On 6/26/23 at 1:58 PM Resident 34 stated she/he was unable to get out of bed due to her/his medical conditions. The resident stated the only activity she had available was the TV and she/he was bored out of (her/his) mind. The resident stated the activities staff did not check on her/him to see if she/he needed or wanted anything else to do. No other independent activities such as books or puzzles were observed in the resident's room. Resident 34's 4/28/23 Activity Evaluation indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to consistently perform pressure ulcer assessments and wound care for 1 of 4 sampled residents (# 56) reviewed for pressure ulcer care. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include: Resident 56 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including paraplegia. A 9/14/21 Weekly Skin Evaluation determined Resident 56 acquired an unstageable left ischeal tuberosity (boney prominence at lower inner buttocks) pressure ulcer. The orders of care for this pressure ulcer continued until 6/2023 and included full skin assessments to be completed weekly. On 11/18/21 United Wound Healing began providing weekly sacral wound care and full skin assessments for Resident 56. Review of Resident 56's care records from 2/2023 through 4/2023 revealed United Wound Healing care was provided on 2/2/23 and then not again until 4/20/23. Review of Resident 56's Weekly Skin Evaluations from 2/2023 through 3/2023 performed by facility nursing staff indicated the assessments were performed only on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen therapy for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#25) reviewed for oxygen. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary oxygen therapy. Findings include: Resident 25 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including sleep apnea. Resident 25's 6/2023 physician orders included oxygen therapy at two liters per minute as needed for shortness of breath. Resident 25's 6/2023 MAR revealed no oxygen administration was documented from 6/1/2023 through 6/28/23. On 6/26/23 at 10:24 AM and on 6/28/23 at 9:03 AM Resident 25 was observed with oxygen administration being provided via nasal cannula at two liters per minute. A review of Resident 25's 6/2023 Progress Notes revealed no evidence the resident complained of shortness of breath on 6/26/23 and 6/28/23. On 6/28/23 at 8:54 AM Staff 4 (CNA) stated Resident 25 was always on oxygen therapy when she/he was in bed. On 6/28/23 at 9:03 AM Staff 5 (RN) stated she had not assessed Resident 25 for shortness of breath and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician visits occurred as required for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#40) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs. Findings include: Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including vascular disease. Review of Resident 40's health record revealed no documentation the resident was seen by her/his physician at least every 60 days. On 6/28/23 at 1:30 PM Staff 22 (LPN Resident Care Coordinator) stated Resident 40's physician did not see the resident very often. Staff 22 reviewed Resident 40's health record and was unable to locate physician notes or documentation to indicate the physician visited the resident as required. On 6/30/23 at 10:52 AM Staff 2 (DNS) was notified of the findings of this investigation and stated the physician was required to see the resident once every 60 days.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication pass error rate of less than 5%. There were three errors in 28 opportunities resulting in a 10.71% error rate. This placed residents at risk for reduced medication efficacy and adverse medication side effects. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 11/2021 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease). Resident 6's 6/2023 physician orders included the following: - cholecalciferol tablet, 50 mcg, give two tablets one time a day; - fluticasone propionate suspension 50 mcg, two sprays in each nostril two times a day, to be administered by CMA/Licensed Nurse to ensure adherence; - polyethylene glycol 3350 powder, give 17 gm one time a day. On 6/28/23 from 7:31 to 8:00 AM Staff 21 (CMA) was observed for Resident 6's morning medication administration. During the observation, Staff 21 did not dispense and administer the cholecalciferol tablets, fluticasone propionate nasal spray or the polyethylene glycol 3350 powder. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records were accurate for 2 of 10 sampled residents (#s 6 and 56) reviewed for medication administration and pressure ulcer care. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate health records and worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease). Resident 6's 6/2023 physician orders included the following: - cholecalciferol tablet, 50 mcg, give two tablets one time a day; - fluticasone propionate suspension 50 mcg, two sprays in each nostril two times a day, to be administered by CMA/Licensed Nurse to ensure adherence; - polyethylene glycol 3350 powder, give 17 gm one time a day. On 6/28/23 from 7:31 to 8:00 AM Staff 21 (CMA) was observed for Resident 6's morning medication administration. During the observation, Staff 21 did not dispense and administer the cholecalciferol tablet, fluticasone propionate nasal spray or the polyethylene glycol 3350 powder.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$122,699 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $19,135 — penalty dated 2026-01-06
- $94,744 — penalty dated 2024-10-15
- $8,820 — penalty dated 2024-07-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385121. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.