No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Blue Mountain Care Center

112 East Fifth Street, Prairie City, OR 97869 · Non profit - Corporation · 40 certified beds · (541) 820-3341 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Call the home — (541) 820-3341 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Oct 2025Resident-funds citation (F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
120 E Main St · (541) 575-0629 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
222 W Front St · (541) 820-3588 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
154 W Williams St · (541) 820-4437

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.5%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.5%4.7%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder6.4%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.8%4.9%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.2%2.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication0.0%12.4%18.9%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%5.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.4%21.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.5%13.9%17.1%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. Inspectors cited this home for failing to submit its staffing data to CMS (F0851) — see the citation below. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-10-17)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record it was determined the facility failed to follow a comprehensive care plan related to transfers for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for transfers. This placed residents at risk for unsafe transfers. Findings include: Resident 4 admitted to the facility in 2026 with diagnoses including hip fracture. The 4/13/26 Care Plan indicated Resident 4 required a [NAME]-steady (sit to stand transfer device) for transfers. A 5/12/26 email from Staff 6 (OT) to Staff 3 (RNCM) indicated Resident 4 reported that Staff 5 (LPN) transferred her/him from the recliner to the wheelchair without using the [NAME]-steady. The resident did not report any injury. The resident's Care Plan indicated she/he was to be transferred using the sara0steady. The email further indicated Resident 4 was not to be transferred any other way than by using the [NAME]-steady. On 5/27/26 at 10:39 AM Staff 6 stated Resident 4 reported to her that she/he was transferred by stand pivot instead of the [NAME]-steady by nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement interventions related to substance use disorder for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#3) reviewed for safety. This placed residents at risk for uncontrolled substance use disorder. Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a stroke and malnutrition.A review of the 3/4/26 signed physician orders revealed Resident 3 received tube feeding through a gastrostomy tube (liquid nutrition, fluids, and medications are delivered directly into the stomach through a small, surgically created opening in the abdomen) and Resident 3's current diet order was NPO (nothing by mouth).The 3/17/26 admission MDS revealed Resident 3 had a BIMS of 15 indicating she/he was cognitively intact. A 4/14/26 Progress Note revealed Resident 3 was observed by Staff 14 (RN) ambulating down the hallway with unsteady gait, red/glossy eyes, odor of alcohol present, and increased drooling from baseline. Resident 3 denied…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse was on duty for 1 of 2 days reviewed for licensed nurse staffing. This placed residents at risk for delayed and unmet medical needs. Findings include: On 10/14/25 at 6:07 PM Staff 17 (Former DNS) stated there was one occasion on 8/6/25 or 8/7/25 when there was no nurse working on night shift. On 10/15/25 at 9:43 AM a request was made from Staff 1 (Administrator) for the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports and the daily staff assignment sheets from 8/6/25 and 8/7/25.On 10/15/25 at 10:18 AM Staff 21 (Quality Coordinator) stated she was unable to locate the daily staff assignment sheets for 8/6/25 and 8/7/25. On 10/15/25 at 2:18 PM Staff 1 stated she was unable to locate the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports for 8/6/25 and 8/7/25.On 10/15/25 at 4:00 PM Staff 1 stated the facility did not have a nurse working night shift on 8/7/25.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse was available for at least eight consecutive hours for 3 of 17 days reviewed for RN coverage. This placed residents at risk for delayed nursing assessments. Findings include:A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports for 9/1/25 and 10/1/25 through 10/16/25 revealed the following dates without the required RN coverage:-9/1/25-10/6/25-10/7/25On 10/16/25 at 4:53 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the identified dates without the required RN coverage.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-17 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to post accurate and complete staffing information and failed to retain required staff postings for 1 of 1 facility reviewed. This placed residents and the public at risk for incomplete and inaccurate staffing information. Findings include:a. On 10/15/25 at 9:43 AM a request was made from Staff 1 (Administrator) for the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports from 8/1/25 through 10/14/25.On 10/15/25 at 2:18 PM Staff 1 stated she was unable to locate the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports for 8/1/25 through 8/31/25 and 9/2/25 through 9/30/25.b. A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports from 10/1/25 through 10/16/25 revealed 16 of 16 days when portions of the form were left blank, crossed out, or were inaccurate. The incomplete or inaccurate information included the daily census, and the number of working staff.On 10/16/25 at 4:53 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports were incomplete and inaccurate for the identified dates.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility administration failed to use resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well being. Deficient practice was noted related to a lack of staffing, a failure to retain staff postings, infection control, physician visits, social services, and resident rights for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for effective administration. Findings include:1.The facility failed to offer the resident/representative opportunities to participate in their care planning process via care conference for four identified residents (#s 3, 4, 6, and 13). On 10/16/25 at 2:07 PM Staff 4 (SSD) acknowledged residents were not being offered an opportunity to participate in the care planning process for the identified residents.Refer to F553.2. The facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Agency (SA) and failed to thoroughly investigate the allegation of abuse for one identified resident (#10).On 10/16/25 at 3:26 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-17 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to submit mandatory staffing information based on the payroll data journal and other verifiable and auditable data as required. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate staffing information. Findings include:A review of the Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data for Fiscal Year Quarter 1 and Quarter 2 of 2025 (April 1-June 30) indicated the facility failed to submit required data for the two quarters.On 10/15/25 at 2:40 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed the Payroll-Based Journal was not submitted.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a community use glucometer was properly cleaned and sanitized between resident uses, and the facility failed to develop and conduct a risk analysis assessment for potential areas of growth and spread of water-borne pathogens. This placed residents at risk for exposure to water-borne and blood-borne pathogens. Findings include:1.The blood glucose monitoring system manufacturer instructions indicated to disinfect the meter with EPA-registered wipes. The 4/4/25 facility policy and procedure for blood glucose monitoring machines indicated to clean glucometers according to manufacturer's instructions and/or using an EPA approved germicidal disposable cloth. a. On 10/14/25 at 1:56 PM Staff 3 (LPN) was observed to administer insulin to Resident 11, and stated she checked the resident's CBG previously. On 10/14/25 at 2:09 PM Staff 3 stated she sometimes used alcohol wipes to clean glucometers. b. On 10/16/25 at 11:51 AM Staff 16 (RN) was observed to check Resident 5's CBG using a community use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-17 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a qualified and trained infection preventionist in place for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection prevention and control. This placed residents at risk for inadequate infection control. Findings include:On 10/13/25 surveyors requested documentation to indicate the facility had an infection preventionist in place.On 10/16/25 at 12:30 PM Staff 14 (IP) stated she started the IP role in October 2024 and did not complete the required training to become qualified. Staff 14 stated Staff 15 (Former IP) was assisting with the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program until recently.On 10/16/25 at 2:47 PM Staff 5 (Human Resources) provided documentation to indicate Staff 15's last day working in the facility was on 10/5/25.On 10/17/2025 at 8:16 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she was unaware of the required qualifications and training for the infection preventionist and just learned on 10/16/25. Staff 1 confirmed the facility did not have a certified infection preventionist from 10/6/25 to present.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to obtain information related to advance directives and health care decisions for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 3, 5, 6 and 12) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for not having their health care decisions honored. Findings include: The facility's 2/2009 Philosophy Statement form located in the admission packet included information related to advance directives. The form included questions related to if the resident already had an advanced directive in place or if information was provided and was accepted or declined. The form included a signature for the resident or responsible party to sign. 1. Resident 5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed no indication an advanced directive was reviewed or offered. On 10/15/25 at 1:35 PM Resident 5 stated she/he did not know what an advance directive was and was never offered or provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-17 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure long term residents received physician visits every 90 days for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 1, 8 and 11) reviewed for unnecessary medications and nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs. Findings include:1. Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including dementia and muscle weakness. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 1 received telehealth (virtual, not in-person) physician visits and the last in-person physician visit was on 2/18/25. On 10/15/25 at 9:16 AM Staff 13 (Former Administrator) stated physician visits were completed via telehealth. On 10/16/25 at 9:16 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she believed only telehealth physician visits were acceptable. Staff 1 acknowledged Resident 1's last face to face physician visit was on 2/18/25. 2. Resident 8 admitted to the facility in 11/2024 with diagnoses including dementia and hypertension. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 8 received telehealth physician visits and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-17 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to inform residents and/or resident's responsible party of the risks and benefits, and to ensure consent was obtained, for the use of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of informed consent of psychotropic medications. Findings include:Resident 6 admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses including depression and insomnia.An 8/19/25 and 9/25/25 physician order indicated the following medications to be administered to Resident 6:- Trazadone (antidepressant) for insomnia- Sertraline (antidepressant) for depression- Bupropion ((antidepressant) for depressionA review of the clinical record revealed no indication the risks and benefits of the antidepressant medication was reviewed, or consent was obtained from Resident 6.On 10/15/25 at 12:00PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she was unable to locate any information to indicate the risks and benefits was reviewed, or a consent was obtained by Resident 6, for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-17 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to offer the resident/representative the opportunity to participate in the care planning process for 4 of 5 sampled residents (#s 3, 5, 6 and 13) reviewed for care planning. These failures placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge and input for the care planning process. Findings include:1. Resident 5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes. Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed no indication a care conference was offered or completed since admission. On 10/15/25 at 1:35 PM Resident 5 stated she/he had never had a care conference to review her/his care plan and was interested in having a care conference if it was offered. On 10/16/25 at 2:07 PM Staff 4 (Social Services) stated she was unable to locate in the clinical records any indication care conferences were completed to review a residents' care plan. Staff 4 stated there was no process in place to involve residents in their plan of care. Staff 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency (SA) within the mandated timeframe for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#10) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include:Resident 10 admitted to the facility in 2/2021 with diagnoses including stroke and weakness.The 7/28/25 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 10 had a BIMS of 15, which indicated she/he was cognitively intact.On 10/16/25 between 10:50 AM and 11:16 AM Witness 1 (Anonymous Staff), Witness 2 (Anonymous Staff) and Witness 3 (Anonymous Staff) indicated there were concerns when Staff 12 (LPN) locked the door when Resident 10 went out of the facility and did not allow her/him to re-enter the building. Witness 3 stated Staff 12 told Resident 10, You are not the most important resident here. We can't stop what we are doing and open the door. Witness 3 indicated Resident 10 started crying, and the incident was reported to Staff 2 (DNS).On 10/16/25 at 11:07 AM Resident 10 stated about a month ago Staff 12 was working night shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#10) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include:Resident 10 admitted to the facility in 2/2021 with diagnoses including stroke and weakness.The 7/28/25 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 10 had a BIMS of 15, which indicated she/he was cognitively intact.On 10/16/25 between 10:50 AM and 11:16 AM Witness 1 (Anonymous Staff), Witness 2 (Anonymous Staff) and Witness 3 (Anonymous Staff) indicated there were concerns when Staff 12 (LPN) locked the door when Resident 10 went out of the facility and did not allow her/him to re-enter the building. Witness 3 stated Staff 12 told Resident 10, You are not the most important resident here. We can't stop what we are doing and open the door. Resident 10 started crying and the incident was reported to Staff 2 (DNS).On 10/16/25 at 11:07 AM Resident 10 stated about a month ago Staff 12 was working night shift and when the resident left the facility at 4:40 AM, Staff 12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure expired biologicals were discarded and temperatures of medication refrigerators were monitored for 1 of 1 treatment cart and 1 of 1 medication room reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for reduced efficacy of medication. Findings include:1. On [DATE] at 1:56 PM Staff 3 (LPN) was observed to prepare Humalog insulin for Resident 11. The open date was [DATE]. The manufacturer's instructions indicated the medication was to be discarded 28 days after opening.On [DATE] at 1:56 PM Staff 3 acknowledged the Humalog was expired and was not discarded 28 days after opening.2. On [DATE] at 2:09 PM the medication refrigerator logs were reviewed with Staff 3 (LPN). There were no recorded temperatures for [DATE] or [DATE]. The medication refrigerator was observed to contain insulin and medications.On [DATE] at 2:09 PM Staff 3 stated night shift was responsible for completing the temperature logs and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-17 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were provided for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for dental care needs. This placed residents at risk for unmet dental needs. Findings include:Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including heart failure.On 10/14/25 at 9:27 AM Resident 3 stated it had been one year since she/he had a dentist appointment and there were issues finding a dentist that accommodated residents who required wheelchairs.No evidence was found in the clinical record to indicate a dental appointment was made since the resident's admission.On 10/16/25 at 2:08 PM Staff 4 (Social Services) stated she started at the end of September 2025 and was just now learning what her role was supposed to be. She stated she was not involved in dental services and provided no additional information regarding when Resident 3's dental status was reviewed.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-17 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide dental services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#12) reviewed for dental services. This placed residents at risk for unmet dental needs. Findings include:Resident 12 admitted to the facility in 2015 with diagnoses including heart failure and diabetes.A review of the 7/28/25 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 12's BIMS score was a four, indicating severe cognition impairment.On 10/14/25 at 9:40 AM Witness 5 (Family) stated she was involved in Resident 12's care at the facility. Witness 5 stated Resident 12 had three natural teeth remaining and did not receive routine dental cleaning in the past year. Witness 5 stated she wanted Resident 12 to receive routine dental cleanings.No evidence was found in the clinical record regarding Resident 12's dental cleaning history.On 10/16/25 at 2:08 PM Staff 4 (Social Services) stated she started at the end of September 2025 and was just now learning what her role was supposed to be. She stated she was not involved in dental services and provided no additional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-17 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide therapy services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for functional decline. Findings include:Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including dementia and muscle weakness.A review of the 9/12/25 Annual MDS indicated Resident 1's BIMS score was a four, indicating severe cognition impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident 1 had swallowing issues including loss of liquids and/or solids from the mouth when eating and/or drinking along with coughing or choking during meals.A review of the 7/29/25 Nutrition at Risk (NAR) notes revealed concerns for increased risk of choking. The notes indicated Resident 1 was waiting for insurance authorization for a SLP evaluation. A review of the 8/7/25 Tele-Health Physician Provider Note revealed the resident had a recent diagnosis of lung cancer, was experiencing dysphagia and weight loss, and was awaiting a SLP evaluation.A review of the 8/28/25 Tele-Health Physician Provider Note revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-17 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify hospice services of the resident's death in a timely manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#16) reviewed for hospice. This placed residents at risk for a lack of coordination of care upon death. Findings include: A review of the facility [DATE] Hospice Services Policy and Procedure revealed the following:- Blue Mountain Care Center (BMCC) will coordinate with the State Recognized Hospice Program to provide support to terminally ill residents (and their families) that resides in the facility.- Hospice and BMCC will communicate with each other when any changes are indicated to the Plan of Care.- The Plan of Care will be consistent with the Hospice philosophy of care.-BMCC will comply with the hospice policies and procedures.On [DATE] a public complaint was received by the State Agency which alleged the facility failed to notify hospice services of Resident 16's death in a timely manner. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent. There were five errors in 26 opportunities resulting in a 19 percent error rate. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: 1. Resident 164 admitted to the facility in 8/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes. The 6/5/24 physician order indicated Resident 164 was to receive Novolin R (insulin) seven units before meals. The manufacturer instructions for Novolin R indicated to prime the insulin pen with two units prior to drawing up the insulin for administration. On 8/13/24 at 12:18 PM Staff 4 (RN) was observed to administer seven units of Novolin R via insulin pen to Resident 164. Staff 4 did not prime the insulin pen with two units prior to drawing up the insulin for administration. On 8/13/24 at 12:55 PM Staff 4 acknowledged she did not prime the insulin pen prior to administration and stated she was not aware the Novolin R insulin pen needed to be primed. 2. Resident 8 readmitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards were followed for 1 of 1 RN (Staff 2) reviewed for medications and pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication reactions and worsening of wounds. Findings include: The Oregon State Board of Nursing Scope of Practice Standards for Registered Nurses (OAR [PHONE NUMBER]) outlined standards related to the Registered Nurse's responsibility for nursing practice implementation. Applying nursing knowledge . the Registered Nurse shall implement the plan of care by: - Implementing treatments and therapy, appropriate to the context of care, including emergency measures, interpretation of medical orders, medication administration, independent nursing activities, nursing, medical and interdisciplinary orders, health teaching and health counseling; - Documenting nursing interventions and responses to care in an accurate, timely, thorough, and clear manner. The Oregon State Board of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide nail care to dependent residents for 2 of 2 sample residents (#s 10 and 11) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of grooming and skin impairments. Findings include: 1. Resident 10 admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including kidney disease. The 7/26/21 Care Plan indicated Resident 10 required ADL assistance by staff for personal hygiene. Review of Resident 10's clinical medical record revealed no documented evidence for when the resident's nail care was to be provided. Observations made on 8/13/24 at 9:20 AM and on 8/14/24 at 9:30 AM revealed Resident 10 with long fingernails. Some of the fingernails were curved down, touching the nail bed. Resident 10 was unable to state when her/his fingernails were last trimmed. On 8/14/24 at 9:24 AM Staff 6 (CNA) stated resident nail care was to be done on shower days and as needed. Staff 6 stated nail care was documented in Tasks under personal hygiene and there was no specific place to document when nail care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement physician orders upon admission for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#164) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication reactions. Findings include: Resident 164 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including post-surgical care for a toe amputation. The 8/2/24 hospital discharge orders indicated Resident 164 was to receive the following medications: -doxycycline (an antibiotic medication) 100 mg; 1 tablet BID. 8/3/24 PM dose was missed. -losartan (a hypertension medication) 25 mg; 1 tablet BID. 8/3/24 PM dose was missed. -pravastatin (a cholesterol medication) 40 mg; 1 tablet one time a day. 8/3/24 dose was missed. The MAR and 8/3/24 progress note indicated Resident 164 did not receive one dose of doxycycline, one dose of losartan, and one dose of pravastatin. An 8/3/24 at 4:58 PM progress note revealed Staff 5 (RN) was unable to resume many meds and documented in the progress note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to initially assess and monitor pressure ulcers for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 6 and 8) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers and unassessed treatment needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 admitted to the facility on 5/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes and a sacral fracture. The 5/20/24 admission Nursing Database indicated Resident 8 did not have any wounds present. The 5/20/24 care plan indicated the resident had a potential impairment to skin integrity related to diabetes and fragile skin. Interventions included to encourage and assist resident to change positions frequently; notify nurse of new skin issues; and follow facility protocols for treatment of injury. The 8/2024 TAR revealed the facility implemented a standing order for wound care on 8/10/24 for a wound to Resident 8's left buttock. The 8/11/24 at 4:36 AM progress note indicated wound care was completed to an open area on Resident 8's left buttock. It was noted there was no drainage, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain ordered medications timely for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 1 and 7) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for not receiving prescribed medications. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease. The 8/9/24 physician order indicated Resident 1 had a UTI and to start Keflex (antibiotic) 500 mg TID for seven days. The 8/2024 MAR indicated Resident 1 did not receive Keflex on the following dates and times: -8/10/24 8:00 PM -8/11/24 7:00 AM -8/11/24 12:00 PM -8/11/24 8:00 PM -8/12/24 7:00 AM -8/12/24 12:00 PM On 8/15/24 at 12:29 PM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged Resident 1 did not receive Keflex as ordered on the identified dates. Staff 2 was observed to check the electronic medication dispensing system for availability of Keflex and stated he was unsure of how to check for inventory and availability of medication. Staff 2 stated he thought the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to address pharmacist recommendations in a timely manner for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 6, 8 and 12) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary medication administration. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 admitted to the facility on 5/2024 with diagnoses including depression. A 7/8/24 Pharmacy Review indicated Resident 8 received mirtazapine (an antidepressant) 7.5 mg at bedtime. The recommendation was to discontinue this medication. On 8/6/24, (29 days later), the physician agreed with the pharmacy recommendation. A review of the 8/2024 MAR indicated Resident 8 received the last dose of mirtazapine 7.5 mg at bedtime on 8/6/24. On 8/15/24 at 3:11 PM Staff 3 (RNCM) stated the expectation was for the physician to address the pharmacy recommendations within two weeks and implement the recommendations. Staff 3 acknowledged Resident 8 had a pharmacy recommendation on 7/8/24 and it was not signed by the physician until 8/6/24. 2. Resident 6 readmitted to the facility in 2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 6 and 8) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate wound measurements. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 admitted to the facility on 5/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes and a sacral fracture. The 8/15/24 at 11:59 AM progress note by Staff 2 (DNS) indicated Resident 8 had a Stage 2 pressure ulcer on the left inner gluteal (muscles that make up the buttock area) that measured 1.2 inches long, .5 inches wide, and 0 inches deep with no visual drainage or odor. Four Stage 2 pressure ulcers to the left forearm were also identified and measured. The 8/15/24 at 12:49 PM Weekly Wound Observation Tool completed by Staff 2 indicated Resident 8 had a Stage 2 pressure ulcer on the left gluteal and left forearm, slough tissue was present (yellow/white material in the wound bed), and the wounds were facility acquired on 5/15/24. The measurements were 20 mm long, 13 mm wide, 02 mm deep and had minimal drainage with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-18 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff annual performance reviews were completed for 2 of 2 sampled CNA staff (#s 5 and 6) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of competent staff. Findings include: On 5/16/23 at 10:18 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) was asked for the annual performance reviews for Staff 5 (CNA) and Staff 6 (CNA). Employee performance reviews indicated the following: -Staff 5 was hired 3/1995 and the last performance review was completed in 2021; -Staff 6 was hired 7/2020 and the last performance review was completed in 2021. On 5/16/23 at 2:31 PM Staff 1 acknowledged the last performance review for Staff 5 and Staff 6 was completed in 2021 and the annual performance reviews were not completed for 2022 for the identified CNA staff.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. This placed residents at risk for developing antibiotic resistance. Findings include: On 5/17/23 at 9:52 AM a request was made for the antibiotic stewardship program documentation from Staff 2 (DNS/IP). On 5/17/23 at 9:52 AM Staff 2 stated the facility had no process to track antibiotic use and did not have an antibiotic stewardship program in place.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide quarterly statements in writing of Personal Incidental Funds (PIF) for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 3 and 5) reviewed for PIFs. This placed residents at risk of being uninformed of financial statements. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including dementia. On 5/15/23 at 8:47 AM Witness 1 (Complainant) stated the facility was in charge of Resident 3's finances including managing her/his PIF (Personal Incident Fund) of 30 dollars a month. Witness 1 stated she used to receive quarterly statements of Resident 3's PIF account but not longer received the statement and was unaware of how much Resident 3 had in her/his account. On 5/15/23 at 12:08 PM Staff 3 (Social Services) stated she was unsure if a quarterly statement was sent of Resident 3's PIF account. Staff 3 stated the account was managed by Staff 4 (Accountant). On 5/15/23 at 1:28 PM Staff 4 stated she managed Resident 3's finances including her/his PIF account. Staff 4 stated she did not sent out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete comprehensive assessments for 1 of 5 sampled residents (# 6) reviewed for medication. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs. Findings include: Resident 6 admitted to the facility in 3/2023 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder and depressive disorder. The 4/2023 MARs indicated Resident 6 received the following medications: -trazodone (antidepressant medication) once daily; -bupropion (antidepressant medication) once daily; -buspirone (antianxiety medication) BID. The 4/7/23 Psychotropic Drug Use CAA was blank. The CAA failed to identify resident behaviors, history of the use of psychotropic medications, current psychotropic medication use, interventions or monitoring in place related to the resident's use of the medications. On 5/16/23 at 10:32 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged Resident 6's Psychotropic Drug Use CAA was blank and was not comprehensive as identified.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess and treat diabetic ulcers for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for worsening skin conditions. Findings include: Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including stroke and diabetes. A 4/1/23 progress note indicated Resident 1 had a wound on her/his right great toe, it was swollen and an open area was noted to be a 2 cm round wound. Wound Care notes indicated the resident had a diabetic ulcer to the right great toe measuring as follows: -4/5/23 0.70 cm x 1.0 cm. Topical care: cleanse with wound cleanser; apply skin prep to peri-wound; primary dressing: therahoney to wound base; secondary dressing: 2 x 2 Allevyn (foam dressing); change every week and PRN if it falls off. -4/12/23 0.80 cm x 0.80 cm [no changes to treatment]. -4/19/23 0.50 cm x 0.50 cm [no changes to treatment]. Plan to schedule to return in one month. There was no indication the wound care orders from the 4/5/23 wound consult were implemented. Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess and treat pressure ulcers for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include: Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including stroke. A 3/29/23 progress note indicated Resident 1 had a 1.4 cm x 0.8 cm x 0.3 cm wound to the left gluteal fold. The area was cleansed with wound cleanser and gauze, and covered with dressing. Wound Care notes indicated the Stage 3 pressure area to the left buttock was assessed and measured as follows: *4/5/23 0.9 cm x 1.5 cm x 0.1 cm. Topical care: cleanse with wound cleanser; apply skin prep to peri-wound; primary dressing: therahoney to wound base; secondary dressing 2 x 2 Allevyn. Change twice weekly and PRN if soiled or falls off. *4/12/23 0.9 cm x 1.5 cm x 0.1 cm (no changes to treatment). *4/19/23 0.9 cm x 1.5 cm x 0.1 cm (no changes to treatment). Plan to schedule to return in one month. The 4/6/23 and 5/4/23 physician orders indicated Allevyn dressing to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have an order in place for the use of a catheter for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#119) reviewed for catheters. This placed residents at risk for urinary tract infections. Findings include: Resident 119 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including failure to thrive. The 4/19/23 admission Summary indicated Resident 119 had a Foley catheter when she/he admitted to the facility. No initial physician order for the catheter was located in Resident 119's clinical record. Resident 119's 4/24/23 hospice orders indicated the following: -Foley catheter to down drain; replace every six weeks or by order. May irrigate with 60 cc normal saline PRN. The 4/2023 and 5/2023 TARs did not indicate orders to irrigate the catheter and did not include monitoring of the catheter. On 5/15/23 at 9:11 AM, 12:53 PM and 2:23 PM Resident 119's catheter bag and tubing were observed to be hanging on the bed. A review of the clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a thorough medication regimen review was completed by the pharmacist monthly for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 2 and 4) reviewed for antibiotic use. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: 1. Resident 4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis. The 3/2/23 physician orders indicated Resident 4 received cephalexin 500 mg once daily for UTI prophylaxis. The order indicated the initial start date was 5/25/22. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed no evidence the resident's use of cephalexin was reviewed by a pharmacist. On 5/16/23 the state survey team requested a rationale for Resident 4's use of cephalexin. A log note from the physician was received that indicated appears [she/he] is on daily Keflex [cephalexin] for UTI prophylaxis given [her/his] frequent UTIs previously. On 5/17/23 at 12:28 PM Staff 8 (Pharmacist) stated she looked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete psychotropic drug reviews for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 2 and 8) reviewed for medications. This place residents at risk for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including chronic pain, dysthymic disorder and epilepsy. The 4/8/21 Care Plan indicated Resident 8 used antidepressant medication related to the diagnoses of dysthymic disorder. Interventions included to monitor side effects and effectiveness of the medication. Review of the provided February, March and April 2023 psychotropic reviews entitled Pharmacist Recommendations/Review indicated a 30 day review was completed with no recommendations. No other documentation related to a psychotropic drug review were indicated. The form included signatures of the pharmacist and the physician only. On 5/16/23 at 10:16 AM and 5/17/23 at 11:16 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated the facility did not complete psychotropic drug meetings for any residents including Resident 8. 2. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for incomplete medical records. Findings include: Resident 8 admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including chronic pain, dysthymic disorder and epilepsy. 7/13/22 physician orders indicated CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel) and CBC (complete blood count) labs were to be completed annually (February) and the dilantin level (tests level of dilantin [seizure medication] in the blood) every 6 months (February and August). The orders indicated Resident 8 received 100 mg of phenytion (dilantin) BID related to seizures. A progress note dated 2/8/23 indicated Resident 8's blood was drawn for CMP, CBC and dilantin level and sent to the lab. Review of Resident 8's medical record revealed results for from the CBC lab and no documentation of the results for the CMP or dilantin labs were found. On 5/17/23 at 11:03 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the lab results…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper placement of a resident's catheter to prevent infection for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 4 and 119) randomly observed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for infection. Findings include: 1. Resident 4 admitted to the facility in 5/2022 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis. On 5/15/23 at 10:35 AM Resident 4's catheter bag and tubing were observed uncovered hanging on the bed with the lower part of the bag lying on the floor next to the resident's bed. On 5/15/23 at 2:18 PM Resident 4's catheter bag was observed uncovered hanging on the recliner with the lower part of the bag touching the floor. On 5/15/23 at 2:29 PM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed Resident 4's catheter bag was touching the floor and expected it to be off the floor for infection control. 2. Resident 119 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including failure to thrive. On 5/15/23 at 9:11 AM, 12:53 PM and 2:23 PM Resident 119's catheter bag and tubing were observed uncovered hanging on the bed with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 38E040. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next