No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aidan Senior Living at Reedsport

600 Ranch Road, Reedsport, OR 97467 · For profit - Corporation · 29 certified beds · (541) 271-5841 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (541) 271-5841 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$8,018 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,018 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-22)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
400 9th St · (541) 997-8412 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2935 Highway 101 · (541) 902-9966 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway1.4 mi
1499 Highway 101 S · (541) 271-3142 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Bicentennial Park · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.5%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.6%4.7%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.4%2.0%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.7%4.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.4%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.2%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.3%95.2%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%5.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.2%21.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.3%13.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.88
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
4.61
Aide hours/ resident / day
6.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.97
RN hoursweekends
43.1%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 29 beds and averages 24.6 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.42 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.73 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.97 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-28)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow care plan transfer interventions for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in a fall for Resident 1 with hospitalization for a fractured back. Findings include: Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility in 11/2022, with diagnoses including above the knee amputation of both legs, diabetes, and dementia. A facility Incident Report dated 8/4/23, indicated Resident 1 had a witnessed non-injury fall while being propelled in the shower chair in the shower room. The CNA who assisted the resident stated she was backing up with the resident in the shower chair. The wheel of the chair dropped down into the recessed floor drain and the chair flipped over backwards. The CNA was able to lower the resident to the floor. The root cause of the fall was determined to be related to the resident's absence of legs which made the resident top heavy in the shower chair. When the chair wheel dropped in the drain area the chair became unstable and flipped backwards. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was stored properly in 1 of 1 resident refrigerator, and failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and handled properly in 1 of 1 kitchen. This put residents at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings include: During the initial kitchen observation on 3/24/25 at 9:18 AM, the following item was found in the cook's freezer: - One unlabeled clear plastic cup with frozen brown liquid inside and no open date. During the initial kitchen observation on 3/24/25 at 9:22 AM, the following items were found in the walk-in freezer: - One opened and used bag of frozen sliced bananas with no open date. - One opened and used bag of frozen blueberries with no open date. - One opened and used bag of filled square pasta with no open date. - One opened and used bag of frozen cherries with no open date. During the initial kitchen observation on 3/24/25 at 9:26 AM, the following items were found in the walk-in refrigerator: - One…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a personalized care plan was created for 1 of 1 resident (#4) reviewed for activities. This put residents at risk for lack of personal preferences being honored. Findings include: The facility Care Planning policy, revised 9/2013, indicated the care planning team, including the activities director/coordinator, was responsible for developing an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident. Resident 4 admitted to the facility in 11/2024 with diagnoses including depression and diabetes. A 12/6/24 admission MDS indicated Resident 4 had mild cognitive impairment and depression. The MDS also indicated being around animals, doing things with groups of people, doing her/his favorite activities, and going outside to get fresh air in good weather were somewhat important to her/him. A 3/4/25 Activities Participation Review indicated Resident 4 liked independent activities in her/his room, liked to color pictures, liked to watch the deer on the patio, and liked to watch tv in her/his room. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free from accident hazards for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#19) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings include: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 7/2024 with diagnoses including dementia and disc degeneration (condition when the discs between the vertebrae in the spine wear down). A 7/26/24 admission MDS revealed Resident 19 sustained a fall in the last two to six months. A Care Plan Report revealed on 7/29/24 Resident 19 required the assistance of one person for toileting. Resident 19 had a history of falls and impaired safety awareness. Interventions included to review information on past falls and attempt to determine the cause of the falls. Record possible root causes and alter and remove any potential causes. A 9/29/24 Unwitnessed Fall investigation revealed on 9/29/24 at 11:27 AM Resident 19 sustained a fall in the bathroom. The CNA reported Resident 19's call light was activated and the CNA found Resident 19 on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident medication was not expired for 1 of 1 medication storage refrigerator. This placed residents at risk for lack of medication efficacy and adverse reactions from expired medications. Findings include: The Tuberculin manufacturer insert indicated a multi-dose vial of Tuberculin should be dated when opened and thrown away after 30 days to avoid oxidation and degradation. During an observation of the medication storage refrigerator on 3/25/25 at 3:42 PM, the following was found: - One open and used multi-dose vial of Tuberculin (solution used in testing for Tuberculosis) with an open date of 2/18/25. On 3/25/25 at 3:48 PM, Staff 8 (LPN) stated the expectation was Tuberculin vials were to be destroyed 28 days after being opened. On 3/27/25 at 1:37 PM, Staff 7 (DNS) stated all Tuberculin multi-dose vials should be dated when opened and thrown away after 28 days.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control standards for 1 of 5 residents (#18) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for exposure and contraction of infectious diseases. Findings include: Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including dementia and insomnia. A 3/7/25 Annual MDS revealed Resident 18 had a severe cognitive impact. A 3/2025 MAR instructed staff to instill two drops of Ciprofloxacin (an antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections) in both eyes every two hours for conjunctivitis (Also known as pink eye, a bacterial or viral infection, or allergic reaction) for two days, starting on 3/21/25. The MAR referred the reader to Administration Notes on 3/21/25 at 12:30 AM, 2:29 AM, 4:30 AM, and 3/22/25 at 6:30 AM. Administration Notes revealed the following for Resident 18 and Ciprofloxacin: -3/21/25 at 1:52 AM: Resident was asleep and refused. -3/21/25 at 3:30 AM: Resident was asleep. -3/21/25 at 4:17 AM: Resident was asleep. -3/22/25 at 6:46 AM: Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 5 residents (#s 18 and 19) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment and unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including dementia and insomnia. A 3/2025 MAR instructed staff to instill two drops of Ciprofloxacin (an antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections) in both eyes every two hours for conjunctivitis (also known as pink eye, a bacterial or viral infection, or allergic reaction) for two days, starting on 3/21/25. The MAR referred the reader to Administration Notes on 3/21/25 at 12:30 AM, 2:29 AM, 4:30 AM, and 3/22/25 at 6:30 AM. Administration Notes revealed the following for Resident 18 and Ciprofloxacin: -3/21/25 at 1:52 AM: Resident was asleep, refused. -3/21/25 at 3:30 AM: Resident was asleep. -3/21/25 at 4:17 AM: Resident was asleep. -3/22/25 at 6:46 AM: Resident was asleep. On 3/28/25 at 8:17 AM, Staff 10 (LPN) stated she was instructed not to wake Resident 18 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to assess and develop a water management plan and failed to perform laundry in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 facility. This placed residents at risk for infections. Findings include: 1. On 12/14/23 at 8:25 AM Staff 7 (Maintenance Director) stated he worked at the facility for multiple years and was not aware of a water management plan related to Legionella (water-borne pathogen). On 12/14/23 at 9:00 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she had the facility's water flow map. A request was made to Staff 1 to provide documentation the facility identified where water-borne pathogens could grow, measures to prevent the growth of the pathogens and how the facility would monitor the measures they had in place. No additional information was provided. 2. On 12/14/23 at 7:41 AM Staff 8 (CNA) stated the night shift staff brought residents' dirty laundry in plastic bins and lined the bins up against the wall in the clean laundry area until the washing machine was available, which was behind a locked door next to the clean…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to deliver mail on Saturdays. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely written communication. Findings include: On 12/13/23 at 9:56 AM during the Resident Council meeting Staff 5 (Activities Director) stated the mail was not delivered to the residents on Saturdays because she did not work on Saturdays. On 12/13/23 at 12:02 PM Staff 5 stated the mail was delivered to the facility on Saturdays, there was no one available to distribute it to the residents. Staff 5 further stated she would deliver the Saturday mail on Mondays.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to clean filters on the heater air-conditioning equipment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for unclean and unhomelike environment. Findings include: No documentation was found related to cleaning of the heater air-conditioning equipment. A 12/7/23 Resident Council minutes indicated the heaters needed cleaned. On 12/11/23 at 12:51 PM Resident 14 stated she/he accidently dislodged the dining room heater air-conditioning face plate and the filter was covered in a layer of dust and dirt. Resident 14 stated she/he reported the dirty filters to Staff 1 (Administrator), but the filters were still not cleaned after several weeks. On 12/14/23 at 8:11 AM, in the presence of Staff 21 (Assistant Environment Services Manager) the heater air-conditioner equipment in room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed. Staff 21 stated he did not know how long it was since it was last cleaned. Staff 21 further stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention program policy and procedure for screening for 1 of 5 sampled staff members (#16) reviewed for facility personnel. This placed residents at risk for abuse and neglect of care. Findings include: The Abuse Prevention Program Policy and Procedure, dated 10/2/19, indicated as part of the resident abuse prevention, the administrator or their designee would conduct employee background checks. A New Hire List from 8/12/23 through 12/12/23 revealed Staff 16 was hired on 9/22/23. An Application Report (background check) from 9/1/23 through 10/31/23 revealed Staff 16's application status was closed because her fingerprints were not obtained. A Person Summary revealed Staff 16's training period was completed on 10/28/23 and she started assisting residents without supervision. No documentation was found in Staff 16's personnel folder indicating she was supervised from 10/28/23 through 12/13/23. On 12/14/23 at 8:37 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she was not aware Staff 16's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise care plan interventions for 5 of 6 sampled residents (#s 7, 8, 12, 13, and 19) reviewed for accidents, nutrition, dignity, activities, and medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with a diagnosis of diabetes. Progress notes revealed the following: -11/5/23 Resident 7 choked on food and was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. -11/30/23 Resident 7 choked in bed. Resident 7 was aware of her/his need to eat meals out of bed. -12/4/23 Resident 7 was found flat in bed and was choking. A 11/30/23 RD assessment indicated the resident had recent choking events and it was likely related to position and the resident did not have swallowing issues. The note indicated the RD agreed with the plan to provide all meals for the resident out of bed. On 12/11/23 during lunch observation, Resident 7 did not eat in the dining room. On 12/11/23 at 2:25 PM Resident 7 was observed in bed with her/his head of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain cleanliness for 1 of 1 Kitchen and 1 of 1 dining room. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination. Findings include: 1. On [DATE], during initial kitchen tour, the dry storage area fan above the door, which moves air from the kitchen into the dry storage area, was observed to be covered in black chunks of dirt and debris. The door from the outside into the kitchen was open, with screen door closed. The screen door was covered in a layer of dust. On [DATE] at 10:12 AM Staff 6 (Dietary Manager) stated he did not have a scheduled time to clean the fan and screen door. Staff 6 stated he would assign a staff member to clean them when he noticed they needed cleaned and confirmed they needed cleaned. 2. A 11/2023 Refrigerator Temperature Log for the dining room revealed for the month of 11/2023 the refrigerator temperature was not checked 19 out of 30 days. On [DATE] at 7:02 AM, in the main dining room, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to review a consent for medications with a resident's representative for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#12) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with a diagnosis of dementia. A 11/26/21 facility admission documentation revealed Witness 1 (Family) signed the resident's paperwork as Resident 12's responsible party. An Informed Consent for Psychotropic Drugs dated 10/20/23 revealed Resident 12 was administered mirtazapine (antidepressant) and olanzapine (antipsychotic). The consent was signed by two staff and not Witness 1. On 12/12/23 at 2:50 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated, annually, the facility reviewed and obtained new consents for residents' psychotropic medication administration. Staff 2 acknowledged Resident 12's consent was signed by two staff members and not Witness 1 and stated she was not sure if the resident's family was called in regards to the resident's current medication dose. No additional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide the risks and benefits for the use of psychotropic medications prior to administration for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of informed consent. Findings include: Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with a diagnosis of dementia. A 11/2023 signed physician orders instructed staff to administer sertraline (a medication used to treat depression) once a day for dementia, and anxiety starting on 9/27/23. A review of clinical records found Resident 18 was not provided the risk and benefits of taking sertraline. On 12/14/23 at 9:32 AM Staff 2 (DNS) and Staff 3 (RN Consultant) confirmed Resident 18's risk and benefits for sertraline was not completed timely.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist a resident with completing an advance directive for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for end of life choices not being honored. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses of stroke and diabetes. A 4/26/23 Care Plan revealed Resident 2 had blindness in both eyes from diabetes. A 5/24/23 Care Conference meeting form revealed Resident 2 requested a staff member read the advance directive to her/him to see if she/he would like help filling it out. A 9/26/23 Annual BIMS revealed Resident 2 was cognitively intact. Resident 2's record did not reveal staff reviewed the advance directive with her/him. On 12/13/23 at 11:15 AM Staff 3 (RN Consultant) stated she would look to see if staff reviewed the advance directive with the resident. No additional information was provided.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provided a two day notice prior to the ending of skilled services for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#71) reviewed for beneficiary notifications. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely appeals. Findings include: Resident 71 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of liver disease. Resident 71's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage form revealed her/his services ended on 10/31/23. The notice was provided on 10/30/23. On 12/13/23 at 3:09 PM Staff 5 (Activities Director) stated she was trained the two day notice included the day the resident was discharged from the facility and not when the services ended. Staff 5 acknowledged the resident discharged on 11/1/23 and the notice was given on 10/30/23, one day before services ended.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to developed care plans for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 12 and 18) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for lack of social engagement. Findings include: 1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with a diagnosis of dementia. A 11/28/23 Activities Participation Review form revealed Resident 12 liked to observe other residents during group activities more than participating and reported to staff she/he wanted to color. Review of the comprehensive care plan last updated 10/16/23 revealed there was no activity focus with goals and interventions. On 12/12/23 at 2:22 PM and 12/13/23 at 11:16 PM Staff 5 (Activities Director) stated Resident 12 had dementia and her/his activity involvement fluctuated but she/he liked to color, watch movies, listen to music and watch her/his peers while they participated in an activity. Staff 5 acknowledged Resident 12 did not have a care plan related to activities. 2. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with a diagnosis of dementia. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's nails were trimmed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#8) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of hygiene. Findings include: Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including heart disease and diabetes. An 10/10/23 annual MDS and CAAs revealed Resident 8 required extensive assist with ADLs. A care plan last revised on 10/26/23 revealed Resident 8 was dependent on staff for cares including showers. Resident 8 was to receive showers every Monday and Thursday. 11/2023 and 12/2023 TARs revealed Resident 8 was to receive diabetic nail care every Monday evening and she/he refused on on 11/27/23, 12/4/23, and 12/11/23. No documentation was found the staff reapproached the resident after refusals. On 12/11/23 at 1:07 PM Resident 8 was observed with long fingernails with brown debris underneath the nails. The resident stated she/he was not able to independently cut her/his nails. On 12/13/23 at 12:37 PM Staff 11 (CNA) stated if a resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff annual performance reviews were completed for 3 of 5 sampled CNA staff (#s 8, 11, and 12) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of competent staff. Findings include: A review of personnel records on 12/13/23 indicated the following employees did not receive their annual performance evaluations: -Staff 12 (CNA), hired on 6/1/78, no evaluation on file for 6/1/22 through 12/13/23. -Staff 11 (CNA), hired on 7/29/19, no evaluation on file for 7/29/22 through 12/13/23. -Staff 8 (CNA), hired on 11/9/17, no evaluation on file for 11/9/22 through 12/13/23. On 12/14/23 at 9:04 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated she did not find annual performance reviews for the above listed staff.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring prior to medication administration for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 7 and 18) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication reactions. Findings include: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses of heart disease and diabetes. A 12/2023 MAR revealed Resident 7 was to be administered Metoprolol two times a day and her/his blood pressure and pulse were to be obtained prior to administration. If the pulse was under 50 beats per minute and the top number of the blood pressure was under 100 the medication was to be held. The blood pressure and pulse were not obtained on 12/7/23 though the 12/12/23 morning dose. On 12/14/23 at 10:08 AM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged the blood pressure and pulse were not obtained on the identified dates. 2. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease. A review of Resident 18's comprehensive care plan revealed no information about Resident 18 receiving a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 8 and 18) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of psychotropic medications. Finding include: 1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder. Resident 8's care plan last updated 10/2023 revealed she/he at times had triggers related to trauma, had vivid dreams and was administered an antianxiety medication. Interventions for mood and behaviors included to provide activities, identify the cause of the behavior, remove the trigger, and to provide consistent routines. A 12/2023 MAR and associated progress notes revealed the resident was administered Ativan (anti-anxiety) eight times from 12/1/23 though 12/10/23 and there were no non-pharmacological interventions provided prior to administration. On 12/13/23 at 7:42 PM Staff 23 (RN) stated he worked with Resident 8 on the evening shift and the resident often…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided routine dental care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for dental. This placed residents at risk for dental pain. Findings include: Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 12/2022 with a diagnosis of a stroke. A 12/6/22 admission MDS indicated Resident 11 was cognitively intact and did not have dental issues. On 12/11/23 at 11:24 AM Resident 11 stated she/he fell prior to admission to the facility and fractured her/his back teeth. The teeth did not hurt, but she/he did not go to a dentist for an exam and normally was examined yearly. On 12/14/23 at 10:08 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated Resident 11 did not report dental pain and acknowledged Resident 11 was not provided routine dental care since admission to the facility.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were not used unless indicated for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for the development of antibiotic resistant organisms. Findings include: Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of diabetes. A 12/1/23 through 12/6/23 vital sign log revealed Resident 18 did not have a temperature greater than 98.5 degrees Fahrenheit (normal 98.6). A 12/6/23 nurse practitioner note indicated the resident was examined and was assessed to probably have pneumonia and the diagnoses was based on presentation and history. The note indicated a chest x-ray was not going to be obtained because it would take the facility an extended amount of time to obtain the x-ray. A 12/6/23 Progress Note indicated Resident 18 was started on an antibiotic for pneumonia. On 12/14/23 at 10:14 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated Resident 18 was diagnosed with pneumonia and the resident was not tested for other types of respiratory infections prior to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pneumonia vaccines were offered for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 3, 5, and 9) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for pneumonia. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with a diagnosis of chronic lung disease. Resident 3's clinical record revealed she/he received a pneumonia vaccine in 2019 but did not indicate the type of vaccine and was potentially eligible to receive another vaccine. On 12/13/23 at 9:46 AM a request was made to Staff 2 (DNS) to provide documentation Resident 3's vaccines were complete. No additional information was provided. 2. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with a diagnosis of a neuromuscular disease. Resident 5's clinical record revealed she/he received a pneumonia vaccine and was eligible to receive another vaccine. There was no documentation to indicate the resident was offered an additional vaccine. On 12/13/23 at 9:46 AM a request was made to Staff 2 (DNS) to provide documentation Resident 5 was offered an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure CNA staff received required 12 hours of in-service training annually for 2 of 5 sampled CNAs (#s 9 and 10) reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of competent staff. Findings include: A review of the facility's staff training records revealed the following: -Staff 9 (CNA), hired 6/9/21, had six hours of documented training from 6/9/22 through 6/9/23. -Staff 10 (CNA), hired 1/27/20, had six hours of documented training from 1/27/22 through 1/27/23. On 12/14/23 at 9:04 AM Staff 9's and Staff 10's training hours were reviewed with Staff 2 (DNS). No additional documentation of training was provided.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from mental and verbal abuse by staff and a resident for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 501 and 502) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: 1. Resident 501 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including stroke and adjustment disorder (excessive reactions to stress that involve negative thoughts, strong emotions and changes in behavior) with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. On 5/30/23 Resident 501 reported to Staff 11 (Social Service Assistant) she/he had high anxiety and increased muscle spasms due to the stress she/he felt because she/he overheard Staff 6 (CNA) tell another CNA she could not be alone with the resident because the resident was targeting her. Staff 6 would also not assist other staff in providing appropriate and timely care for the resident which upset Resident 501 because the resident did not understand why Staff 6 was avoiding her/him or what she/he had done wrong. When interviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate incidents for 5 of 7 sampled residents (#s 1, 2, 5, 16, and 17) reviewed for abuse and accidents. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: 1. Resident 17 admitted to the facility in 1/2022 with diagnoses including diabetes and depression. On 10/14/22 a Written Warning report revealed the following: - Staff 11 (CNA) had four individual complaints within the last week (10/7/14 through 10/14/22) regarding treatments of residents, specifically her attitude when providing care and the way she spoke to the residents. -Resident 17's statement indicated Staff 11 had a rude tone when she/he asked to be placed on the bed pan and Resident 17 could do it herself/himself. Resident 17 did not want assistance from Staff 11 because of her attitude. -Resident 3, Resident 17's roommate indicated Staff 11 was grumpy but did not want to give any other information regarding the incident due to possible retaliation from Staff 11. -Staff 9 (CNA) and Staff 7 (LPN) statements verified Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#17) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for lack of self-worth. Findings include: Resident 17 admitted to the facility in 1/2022 with diagnoses including diabetes and depression. On 10/14/22 a Written Warning report revealed the following: - Staff 11 (CNA) had four individual complaints within the last week (10/7/14 through 10/14/22) regarding treatments of residents, specifically her attitude when providing care and the way she spoke to the residents. -Resident 17's statement indicated Staff 11 had a rude tone when she/he asked to be placed on the bed pan and Resident 17 could do it herself/himself. Resident 17 did not want assistance from Staff 11 because of her attitude. -Resident 3, Resident 17's roommate indicated Staff 11 was just grumpy but did not want to give any other information regarding the incident due to possible retaliation from Staff 11. -Staff 9 (CNA) and Staff 7 (LPN) statements verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess, monitor and document skin issues for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#9) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for additional skin issues. Findings include: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including diabetes and bed confinement status. The facility's Skin and Wound Care Documentation form dated 8/6/20 included the following: -All skin and wound issues would be updated weekly by the LN. -A new skin and wound care progress record would be completed each week with a short narrative regarding the progress of the skin/wound issue. -The LN was to make a note with the size of the wound by length and width (to show progression and if healing or not). -Narrative nursing notes should include description or issue, surrounding area, drainage, measurements, date and intials. -Once the skin and wound issue is resolved the progress record and chart should be placed in the record. -Now tracking skin and wound in the electronic record. -Notify the MD and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate foot care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#9) reviewed for ADL care. This placed residents at risk for unmet foot care needs. Findings include: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including diabetes and bed confinement status. Resident 9's care plan initiated 10/14/21 related to the diabetes diagnosis included staff were to inspect the resident's feet daily for open areas, sores, pressure areas, blisters, edema or redness. Resident 9's care plan dated 10/12/21 revealed the resident was on anticoagulant (prevent or reduce coagulation of blood, prolonging the clotting time) medication and staff should complete a daily skin inspection. A physician order dated 10/18/21 indicated the licensed nurse was to complete diabetic nail care once weekly, every Monday, on the evening shift of shower day. On 10/20/22 at 12:56 PM Resident 9's feet were observed. The skin on the feet and legs was very dry and flaky. The resident's toe nails were overgrown. The nails were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide ROM/RA services for 3 of 4 residents (#s 12, 13 and 17) reviewed for positioning and mobility. This placed residents at risk for decline in mobility. Findings include: 1. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis. On 10/17/22 at 2:46 PM Resident 13 stated she/he wanted more therapy. Resident 13 added she/he was not receiving assistance with exercises, got some stretching but it was not consistent. Review of the medical record indicated Resident 13 had a restorative program developed to maintain her/his ROM. There was no documentation after 8/5/22 indicating Resident 13 received her/his restorative program. On 10/20/22 at 12:19 PM Staff 2 (Assistant DNS) stated restorative services were not being provided due to lack of enough staff. Staff 2 added staff were expected to provide ROM with care and should be documenting the ROM provided. 2. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 1/2022 with diagnoses including diabetes and depression. On 10/17/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess the risk of entrapment, attempt alternatives and explain the risk and benefits for the use of side rails for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for side rail injuries. Findings include: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease. Resident 5 had an order which stated may use side rails based on Restraint/device assessment dated 4/4/22. On 4/28/22 a fall investigation noted Resident 5 likely had a nightmare, attempted to get out of bed and fell on the floor. New interventions included a low bed and fall mats on both sides of the bed. There was no information related to the use or position of the side rails in the investigation notes. Resident 5 had an order dated 4/28/22 for full bed length mobility bars. On 10/18/22 at 10:30 PM Resident 5 was observed in bed with fall mats in place, the bed was in the low position and both side rails were up with pillows leaning against the rails. Physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-10-21 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the daily staff posting was accurate for 17 out of 30 days reviewed for staffing report accuracy. This placed residents at risk for lack of staffing information. Findings include: A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports dated 9/8/22 through 10/17/22 revealed 14 out of 30 days the registered nurse information was not documented and three out of the 30 days revealed portions of the forms were blank or inaccurate. On 10/20/22 at 1:55 PM Staff 2 (Assistant DNS) confirmed the reports were inaccurate three out of the 30 days and did not have the registered nurse coverage included on the forms for 14 out of 30 days.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-07-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AIDAN SENIOR LIVING AT REEDSPORT INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/26/2017
ANDERSON, TROYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2010
BELL, RONALDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2010
BROOKS, SCOTTIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/01/2014
WOOLLEY, JENNIFERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/01/2010
AIDAN HEALTH SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2010

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385164. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next