Columbia Basin Care Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 113 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 41.3 residents a day — about 46% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.92 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to properly disinfect glucose monitors with approved disinfectant wipes between resident uses for 3 of 3 halls reviewed for CBG monitoring. This failure placed residents at risk for blood borne infection. The deficient practice was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. Resident 1 had an active diagnosis of Hepatitis C, and received CBG checks from a community use glucometer, which was not properly sanitized before use with other residents. Findings include:The facility's 10/2011 Obtaining a Fingerstick Glucose Level Policy indicated, Clean and disinfect reusable equipment between uses according to the manufacturer's instructions and current infection control standards of practice.A 9/2024 Arkray Technical Brief Manufacturer Manual indicated, Disinfect common use glucometers with the use of approved disinfectant wipes. The glucometer was to be wiped with the disinfecting wipe and left wet for two minutes to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-02-02 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
  Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for ileostomy (surgical opening in the abdominal wall that provides a way for the end of the small intestine to release stool) care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#13) reviewed for bladder and bowel incontinence. This failure resulted in the Resident 13 experiencing excoriation (a skin injury involving the removal of skin), increased pain and discomfort, unmet ileostomy care needs, a delay in medical care and psychosocial harm. Findings include: The facility's 1/1/26 Ostomy (an artificial opening in an organ of the body, created during an operation) Care Policy instructed the following: -Ostomy care will be provided by licensed nurses under the orders of the attending physician.-The resident's goals and preferences for care and treatment of the ostomy will be used to formulate a plan of care for the ostomy. -The frequency of pouch changes and the products required for changing ostomy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents did not experience an injury during a transfer for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 14 and 160) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in major injury and hospitalization. Findings include: 1. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in 4/2015 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. Resident 14's 4/11/17 Care Plan indicated the resident required a mechanical lift transfer with two staff. Resident 14's 11/23/20 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired, her/his arms were impaired and she/he was totally dependent on two people for transfers. A 12/21/20 Progress Note written by Staff 26 (Former Staff RN) revealed at 6:25 AM, Resident 14 fell from the mechanical lift sling while being transferred from her/his bed to the wheelchair. Resident 14 fell backwards and head first to the ground. Staff 26 assessed Resident 14 and noted the back of the resident's head had a 8 cm x 7 cm hematoma (mass of blood and bruising), a 4 cm x 0.8 cm laceration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-02 · tag F0847 — pattern
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were fully informed and understood the binding arbitration agreement for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1, 2 and 45) reviewed for binding arbitration agreement. This placed residents at risk of being uninformed regarding their legal rights. Findings include:The facility's 1/1/26 Binding Arbitration Agreements Policy indicated the facility shall do the following when explaining the arbitration agreement:-Explicitly inform the resident or his or her representative of his or her right not to sign the agreement as a condition of admission to, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at this facility.-Explain to the resident and his or her representative in a form and manner that he or she understands, including in a language the resident and his or her representative understands. -Ensure the resident or his or her representative acknowledges that he or she understands the agreement. The facility's undated Arbitration Agreement included the following:-You acknowledge that you have the option of not signing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely report an allegation of physical abuse for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#24) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for potential abuse. Findings include:The facility's 1/1/26 Abuse and Neglect Protections and Responsibilities Policy directed the Executive Director (Administrator) or designee to immediately report all allegations of suspected abuse through a FRI. During the 1/26/26 at 9:26 AM entrance conference meeting, Staff 1 (Administrator) notified the surveyor the facility had an incident over the weekend and were going to submit a FRI to the SA (state agency).On 1/26/26 at 12:14 PM Staff 2 (DNS) notified the surveyor Resident 24 was involved in an allegation of abuse on 1/24/26 and the facility would complete a FRI when the investigation was complete.On 1/29/26 at 7:16 PM the SA received a FRI and investigation about the 1/24/26 allegation of abuse for Resident 24. On 1/30/26 at 11:16 AM Staff 14 (LPN) stated she/he called Staff 2 the morning of 1/24/26 to report the Police were at the facility for an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with shaving for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#24) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of personal hygiene and loss of dignity. Findings include:The facility's 1/1/26 Activities of Daily Living Policy indicated a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. The facility will maintain individual objectives of the care plan and periodic review and evaluation. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility in 6/2024 with diagnoses including dementia.Resident 24's 10/16/25 Care Plan revealed the following:-Staff were to set the resident up for daily hand and face washing and combing of hair and assist as needed. -The resident required assistance from one staff person with bathing. Resident 24's 1/2/26 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required partial-to-moderate assistance from staff with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 5 sampled residents (# 3) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects. Findings include:Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2/2023 with a diagnosis including chronic atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), diabetes and hyperlipidemia.Physician orders dated 11/2/25 indicated Resident 3 was prescribed the following medications:-Insulin aspart (fast-acting insulin)100 units/ml pen to be given before meals.-Insulin glargine Solostar (long-lasting insulin) 60 units every 12 hours.-Potassium citrate (helps prevent kidney stones) 2 tablets by mouth two times a day.-Senna Plus (bowel medication) two times a day.-Venlafaxine HCl (antidepressant) one time a day.-Gemfibrozil (treats high cholesterol) one time a day.-Metoprolol Succinate (treats high blood pressure) one time a day.-MiraLAX (bowel medication) one time a day.-Atorvastatin (treats high cholesterol) one time a day.-Digoxin (treats heart failure and abnormal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders and interventions were followed to reduce the risk of accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#24) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for choking and aspiration. Findings include:The facility's 1/1/26 Accidents and Supervision Policy indicated the resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents, including monitoring for effectiveness and modifying interventions when necessary. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility in 6/2024 with diagnoses including oral dysphagia (difficulty chewing, manipulating and controlling food or liquid within the mouth using the tongue, lips and jaw) and oropharyngeal dysphagia (difficulty moving food from the mouth to the throat, often causing coughing, choking or food sticking in the throat). Resident 24's 7/3/24 SLP Evaluation and Plan of Treatment indicated the resident was not to use straws. Resident 24's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders related to enteral (tube) feeding for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#13) reviewed for tube feeding. This placed residents at risk for complications related to the use of a feeding tube. Findings include: The facility's 1/1/26 Care and Treatment of Feeding Tubes Policy directed feeding tubes to be utilized according to physician orders, which typically included the kind of feeding and its caloric value, volume, duration, mechanism of administration and frequency of flush. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with diagnoses including other artificial openings of gastrointestinal tract status (the status of having an artificial opening [stoma] in the digestive tract that requires monitoring). Resident 13's 1/15/26 admission MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact and used a feeding tube. Resident 13's 1/22/26 Physician Orders indicated the following:-The resident was to receive 65 ml of Jevity (a brand of fiber-fortified, therapeutic medical nutrition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to store and handle food in a manner to minimize cross contamination in 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 2 snack refrigerators reviewed for sanitary conditions. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: 1. On 8/26/24 at 10:16 AM during the initial tour of the facility's kitchen, the following was observed in the walk in refrigerator and dry storage area: -Raw meat stored in the walk in refrigerator on a wire rack shelf directly above eggs and cartons of liquid whole eggs; and -Plastic handled scoops stored in the brown sugar, powdered sugar, white sugar and dry pasta storage bins. The scoops' handles touched the food in the bins. On 8/26/24 at 10:24 AM Staff 30 (Food Service Director) stated the meat in the refrigerator should be stored on the bottom shelf to avoid it dripping on the food below it and the scoops should be stored in their holsters to avoid cross contamination. Staff 30 stated, somebody just got lazy. 2. On 8/28/24 at 11:39 AM while plating foods for lunch…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0711 — pattern
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's total program of care was reviewed and documented for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 4, 21 and 23) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unassessed medical needs and adverse side effects of medication. Findings include: 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including neuralgia (nerve pain). Resident 4's 3/2024, 5/2024 and 7/2024 provider visits, conducted and documented by Staff 29 (Gerontology Nurse Practitioner) were reviewed. The provider visit documentation lacked sufficient evidence to indicate the provider evaluated Resident 4's condition and reviewed the resident's total program of care. On 8/29/24 at 3:57 PM staff 29 stated she visited the residents at the scheduled times and as needed and was not sure where the documentation ended up in the residents' electronic health record. Staff 29 did not provide additional information in regard to her reviews, evaluations and documentation of Resident 4's total program of care. On 8/30/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to the ensure the Direct Care Staff Daily Report (DCSDR) postings were accurate for 16 of 27 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents and visitors at risk for inaccurate staffing information. Findings include: Review of the 8/1/24 through 8/27/24 DCSDR indicated the following days when the number of hours CNAs and/or NAs worked were inaccurate on the daily postings: 8/1, 8/2, 8/3, 8/4, 8/5, 8/6, 8/9, 8/10, 8/11, 8/14, 8/19, 8/20, 8/23, 8/25, 8/26, and 8/27. On 8/29/24 at 8:24 AM Staff 17 (Staffing Coordinator) stated she did not fully understand how to complete the DCSDR and did not update the report to reflect changes that occurred in the schedules. On 8/29/24 at 10:10 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she expected the DCSDR to be accurate.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and failed to ensure appropriate use of PPE for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 3, 146, and 296) reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for the spread of infection. Findings include: 1. The CDC's 4/3/24 website, section titled, Transmission Based Precautions, specified Contact Precautions are the second tier of basic infection control and are to be used in addition to Standard Precautions for patients who may be infected or colonized with certain infectious agents for which additional precautions are needed to prevent infection transmission. Use personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately, including gloves and gown. Wear a gown and gloves for all interactions that may involve contact with the patient or the patient's environment. Donning PPE upon room entry and properly discarding before exiting the patient room is done to contain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$52,030 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $52,030 — penalty dated 2026-02-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR