Cedarbrook Senior Care And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 157 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 106 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 670 beds and averages 505.9 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 164 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment on four of 13 nursing units. (Nursing Units C3, D2, D3, D4)Findings include: Observations on April 14, 2026, from 10:30 a.m., to April 16, 2026, at 12:00 p.m., revealed the following:On Unit C3, in the men's bathroom, there was a blue privacy curtain that was dirty with stains on both sides. On Unit D2, two mechanical lifts were observed with thick hair and debris wrapped around the wheels. On Unit D3, one mechanical lift and a sit-to-stand lift were observed with thick hair and debris wrapped around the wheels. There was a mobile vital signs basket observed with thick hair and debris wrapped around the wheels. Between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], there was a Broda chair that had thick hair and debris wrapped around the wheels. In the men's bathroom, there was a mobile bedside commode that had a collection bucket with a yellow liquid and a brown substance spattered inside the bucket. Observations on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, it was determined that the facility failed to report an alleged violation to the State Survey Agency for one of 35 sampled residents. (Resident 83)Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Resident Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property and Other Related Offenses, last reviewed February 7, 2026, revealed that all incidents and allegations of abuse, including injuries of unknown source were to be reported immediately to the Nursing Supervisor, Nursing Administration, Abuse Coordinator, and to local and other officials as mandated by State Law. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 83 had diagnoses that included dementia, cognitive communication deficiency, and Alzheimer's disease. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had severe cognitive impairment. On April 6, 2026, a nurse's note indicated that nursing was alerted by Resident 83's family that a patch of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one of 35 sampled residents. (Resident 29)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 29 had diagnoses that included vascular dementia (a decline in thinking skills caused by conditions that reduce blood flow to the brain), heart disease, and stroke. A physician's order dated July 25, 2019, directed staff to apply a wander alert bracelet. A review of Resident 29's MDS assessment dated [DATE], incorrectly indicated in section P (restraints and alarms) that the resident was not wearing a wander alarm during the last seven days of the review period. In addition, a physician's order dated July 15, 2024, directed staff to administer an antiplatelet medication (aspirin). Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was on an anti-coagulant medication during the last seven days of the review period, not an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain adequate grooming for two of four sampled residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). (Residents 7 and 272)Clinical record review revealed that Resident 7 had diagnoses that included a stroke and hemiparesis (paralysis on left side of the body). Review of the care plan revealed the resident required assistance from staff for ADLs. On April 14, 2026, at 10:55 a.m., the resident was observed in bed. Her fingernails were long, chipped, and dirty with a substance underneath her nails. She stated that she preferred her nails to be kept short, her nails needed to be cut, staff had not offered to cut her nails, and she had not refused. On April 15, 2026, at 10:30 a.m., and on April 16, 2026, at 10:24 a.m., the resident was observed in bed. Her fingernails were long, chipped, and dirty with a substance underneath her nails. There was no evidence that staff had offered to provide the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physicians' orders for three of 35 sampled residents. (Residents 7, 83, 450)Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Administration of Medication, last reviewed on February 7, 2026, revealed that staff should check the medication label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, right route, and right evaluation of necessary documentation before the medication was administered. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 7 had diagnoses that included frequent urinary tract infections, risk for infection related to frequent urinary tract infections, and cerebral infarction with hemiparesis (paralysis of left side, non-dominant side). A physician's order dated November 8, 2025, directed staff to administer a medication (methenamine one gram daily) for prevention of urinary tract infections. The physician ordered that staff were not to administer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement adequate safety interventions for one of 35 sampled residents. (Residents 83)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 83 had diagnoses that included dementia, cognitive communication deficiency, and Alzheimer's disease. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required supervision from staff for bathing and personal hygiene such as shaving, combing hair, and washing hands and face. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident was at risk for severely impaired decision making capacity related to her diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and cognitive communication deficit, and staff were to provide set up assistance for hygiene and grooming and provide cues at times for safety depending on the resident's fluctuating cognitive status. It was also noted that the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that adaptive equipment was provided to one of 35 sampled residents. (Resident 4)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 had diagnoses that included vascular dementia (a progressive decline in thinking skills caused by conditions that block or reduce blood flow to the brain, damaging brain tissue), muscle weakness, and tremors. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident was at risk for nutrition problems and required the use of foam handles on utensils, a suction lip plate, and a cup with two handles and a lid for all meals. A physician's order dated September 9, 2025, directed staff to provide a two-handled cup with a lid to all meal trays, and physician's orders dated October 6, 2025, directed staff to provide foam handles on utensils and a suction lip plate with all meal trays. On April 14, 2026, from 12:05 p.m., through 12:20 p.m., and on April 15, 2026, from 11:50 a.m., through 12:05 p.m., Resident 4 was observed in the dining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow policies and procedures to prevent the spread of infection for one of 35 sampled residents. (Resident 2)Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last reviewed on February 7, 2026, revealed that staff was to wear a gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities, such as changing briefs, to prevent infections. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and obstructive uropathy (a blockage in the urinary system). Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had an indwelling catheter (a device used to drain urine from the bladder). Review of the care plan revealed that Resident 2 required Enhanced Barrier Precautions, and the interventions were for staff to wear gloves…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and comfortable environment on one of 13 nursing units. (Station 3) Findings include: On May 7, 2025, from 10:30 a.m. to 1:15 p.m., the following was observed: In room [ROOM NUMBER], the privacy curtain on the door side of the room had six curtain hooks missing or off track. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the privacy curtain on the bathroom was missing several curtain hooks. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the privacy curtain on the door side of the room was missing three curtain hooks, and the curtain on the widow side of the room was missing six curtain hooks. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the privacy curtain on the door side of the room was missing three curtain hooks. In rooms 211, the privacy curtain on the window side of the room was torn. In an interview on May 8, 2025, at 9:40 a.m., the Assistant Administrator stated that these privacy curtains should have been replaced or fixed. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, employee file review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure employees completed required abuse training in a timely manner for two of eleven sampled newly hired employees. (Employees 11 and 26) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Resident Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property, and other related offenses, last reviewed October 8, 2024, revealed that the facility was to educate staff upon hire and ongoing thereafter regarding the facility's policy to prohibit abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of property for all residents. Review of employee files revealed the following: Employee 11 (E11) had been working at the facility as an executive chef since November 14, 2024. There was no documented evidence that E11 had been educated per the facility policy on abuse prevention upon hire. In an interview on May 9, 2025, at 10:36 a.m., the Assistant Administrator confirmed that E11 had not been educated on abuse prevention per the facility policy. Employee 26 (E26) had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA