Centre Care Rehabilitation And Wellness Services

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 146 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 223.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain informed consent for use of side rails/enabler bars for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 40 and 176); and failed to assess the entrapment risk associated with the use of side rails/enabler bars for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 40 and 149). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 40 revealed a diagnosis list that included weakness, generalized muscle weakness, and difficulty in walking. Observation of Resident 40 on August 12, 2025, at 11:19 AM revealed the resident was in bed. There was a side rail attached to the resident's right side of the bed. A concurrent interview with Resident 40 revealed the resident utilizes the side rail to help get around. Clinical record review for Resident 40 revealed no evidence that the facility obtained informed consent or assessed the side rail for entrapment risks. An interview with the Nursing Home…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documentation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation of an injury of unknown origin for one of one resident reviewed. (Resident 152) Findings include:Clinical record review for Resident 152 revealed a progress note dated June 27, 2025, that indicated staff observed a 5 centimeter (cm) by 4 cm purple bruise to the top of Resident 152's right breast. The progress note indicated that Resident 152 was known to transfer self from chair to bed and toilet and that she was also known to wander with poor safety awareness. Review of the facility's investigation report dated June 27, 2025, at 8:00 AM revealed that Resident 152 was observed with a 5cm x 4cm purple bruise to the top of her right breast. The report also indicated that Resident 152 was unable to give a description of what occurred. The report indicated that the immediate action taken was to assess and measure the area. The report also indicated that Resident 152 was known to transfer self from chair to bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 13). Findings include: Clinical record review of Resident 13's current physician orders revealed an order for Nuplazid (an antipsychotic medication used to treat hallucinations associated with Parkinson's disease) oral cap 34 mg (milligrams) po (by mouth) at bedtime that was ordered November 13, 2021. Review of Resident 13's clinical record revealed quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated March 11, 2025, and June 10, 2025, that failed to indicate Resident 13 was taking an antipsychotic medication. Interview with the Director of Nursing and Nursing Home Administrator on August 14, 2025, at 1:45 PM confirmed the above noted information that the facility failed to accurately code Resident 13's MDS assessments dated March 11, 2025, and June 10, 2025. 483.20(g) Accuracy of AssessmentsPreviously cited 10/8/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the highest practicable care for a change in condition for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 228).Findings include: In an interview with Resident 228 on August 12, 2025, at 12:10 PM the resident indicated although she was primarily independent with activities of daily living (walking, dressing, toileting, hygiene), she has been declining over the past several months with worsening recently due to having pneumonia (lung infection) and a recent appendectomy (procedure to remove an appendix). Resident 228 indicated she felt since staff knew she was independent in the past they don't offer more help, and it has all been harder for her lately. A family member of Resident 228's indicated they were purchasing an electronic scooter for the resident so she could get around easier. Resident 228 stated she was not receiving therapy nor has therapy assessed her with her recent decline. The family member indicated the purchase of a scooter was the family's decision and did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of select policy and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide timely assessments and implement interventions to promote acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of seven residents reviewed for nutritional concerns (Resident 7). Findings include: The facility policy entitled Weighing of Residents, last reviewed without changes June 1, 2025, revealed the facility will monitor the resident's weight to detect significant weight loss or gain in order to ensure that the resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status, taking into account the resident's clinical condition or other appropriate interventions, when there is a nutritional problem. If a resident exhibits a weight change of five pounds from the previous weight in a monthly report, the resident will be reweighed within 24 hours and the reweight will be recorded. If the weight is validated as a new greater than five percent change in one month, the resident will be reviewed by the registered dietitian to investigate the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items and maintain equipment in a safe and sanitary manner in the facility's main kitchen. Findings included: Initial tour of the facility's main kitchen on October 5, 2024, between 9:35 AM and 10:40 AM revealed the following: The walk-in freezer had multiple discarded items on the floor including under the storage shelves. These discarded items included the following: pieces of food (including broccoli and a piece of carrot), various paper products, and a balled-up hair net. Further observation of the walk-in freezer revealed four packages containing gluten free rolls with an expired use by date of 4/30. One of the packages was open to air exposing the rolls to the ambient air. A prep area in front of the freezer contained a drawer with various cooking utensils. There was a significant amount of debris in the bottom of the drawer. An overlying stainless steel shelf contained dust and debris and various stains/splashes on the underside of the shelf. A commercial mixer had various dried…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess and implement physician ordered treatment to maintain range of motion for one of six residents reviewed with range of motion concerns (Resident 52). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 52 revealed a current physician's order dated August 10, 2023, that instructed staff to apply a right hand splint at all times except for care, remove daily for care. Clinical record review for Resident 52 revealed a current care plan that indicated the resident had an activities of daily living self care performance deficit related to the medical history and requires staff assistance for dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and toilet use. An intervention included a right hand splint at all times except for care. A significant change Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated July 29, 2024, noted facility staff assessed Resident 52 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 6,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident participation in formulating an advance directive for one of four residents reviewed for advance directive concerns (Resident 127). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 127 revealed a Medical Treatment Guidelines document (form the facility utilized to document a resident and/or resident's responsible party participation in decisions regarding actions taken in the event of a medical emergency) signed by Resident 127 on [DATE], that indicated she desired full resuscitation as part of her medical care decisions. A physician's order instructed staff to provide Full Code treatment (medical personal would do everything possible to save life in a medical emergency) for Resident 127 from [DATE], to [DATE]. A quarterly MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated [DATE], assessed Resident 127 as cognitively…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected a resident's status for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 143). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 143 revealed a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. PASRR requires that Medicaid-certified nursing facilities: evaluate all applicants for serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability, offer all applicants the most appropriate setting for their needs (in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care settings), and provide all applicants the services they need in those settings) completed July 17, 2024, that indicated she had a positive screen, and that she required a Level II PASSAR. A Department of Human Services Office of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services letter dated July 25, 2024, determined that Resident 143 was eligible for mental health services and that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan regarding a pacemaker for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 176). Findings Include: Clinical record review for Resident 176 revealed a medical history that included the presence of a cardiac pacemaker (surgically implanted device used to control the electrical activity of the heart and regulate the heartbeat). Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated September 17, 2024, noted facility staff assessed Resident 176 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 5, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also noted the presence of a cardiac pacemaker. Review of documentation titled Electrophysiology Visit for Resident 176 dated August 19, 2024, revealed the resident had a biventricular pacemaker implanted on March 5, 2020. Review of Resident 176's clinical record on October 5, 2024, at 1:49 PM revealed no care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA