No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Meadow View Nursing Center

1404 Hay Street, Berlin, PA 15530 · Non profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (814) 267-4212 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 267-4212 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$26,685 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $26,685 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-12)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
426 Main St. · (814) 267-4603 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
413 Broadway St · (814) 267-4013 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
540 Main St · (814) 267-3121 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1394 Beulah Rd · (814) 267-3846 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.3%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.6%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.1%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.4%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication38.4%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.3%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.1%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.8%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission12.2%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.1%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.581.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.091.181.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.14U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.5%CMS range 41.7–71.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 5.2–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.0–13.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.691.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.28
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.62
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
56.9%
Total nursing turnover
56.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 126.0 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-05)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, investigation reports, clinical records, and staff education records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3), resulting in harm to Resident 2 due to a fall that resulted in fractured hip and harm to Resident 3 due to a fall from bed that resulted in a hematoma. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding abuse and neglect, dated September 1, 2024, indicated that the definition of neglect referred to the failure through inattentiveness, carelessness, or omission to provide timely, consistent, safe, adequate, and appropriate services, treatment and care, including but not limited to: nutrition, medication, therapies, and activities of daily living. The absence of reasonable accommodations of individual needs and preferences may result in resident neglect. The facility's policy regarding falls, dated September 1, 2024, indicated that a resident-centered fall prevention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and facility investigation reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an environment that was free of accident hazards for residents who were at risk for falls by failing to follow care-planned interventions and facility policies for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3), resulting in harm to Resident 2 due to a fall that resulted in fractured hip and harm to Resident 3 due to a fall from bed that resulted in a hematoma. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding falls, dated September 1, 2024, indicated that a resident-centered fall prevention plan was to be implemented to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls. The facility's policy regarding a change in status, dated September 1, 2024, indicated that all nursing staff were responsible to ensure pertinent information was communicated to the charge nurse regarding a resident's change in status and all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nutritional interventions to assure that residents received items to maintain proper weight and health for three of ten residents reviewed (Resident 5, 7, 8). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated June 10, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for daily care tasks. The resident's care plan, most recently most recently revised June 11, 2026, indicated that the resident was a nutritional risk and that she was to have whole milk with all meals and ice cream with lunch and supper. A comprehensive MDS assessment for Resident 7, dated April 14, 2026, revealed that the resident is cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for daily care tasks. The resident's care plan, most recently revised on June 16, 2026, indicated that the resident was at risk for malnutrition and that she was to have yogurt with lunch for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff provided assistive devices to drink in accordance with the resident's care plan for one of ten residents reviewed (Resident 9). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding adaptive equipment, dated Jun 16, 2026, revealed that residents who require adaptive eating equipment would receive appropriate devices and assistance to maintain the highest practicable level of independence, dignity, nutritional status, hydration, and safety during meals and snacks. A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment (mandated to assess the resident abilities and care needs) for Resident 9, dated April 14, 2026, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, and required assistance from staff for eating. The resident's care plan, revised June 6, 2026, revealed that the resident had a decreased intake with meals and was at risk of weight loss. The resident's food was to be served in bowls and he was to have a nose out cup (cup with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for two of three ice machines observed. Findings include: Observations of the ice machine in the second floor nutrition room on February 4, 2026, at 8:48 a.m. revealed a dark, removable substance around the seal of the ice machine lid. The parts in the ice machine that the ice dispenses from were covered with a faint black removable substance. Observations of the ice machine in the third floor nutrition room on February 4, 2026, at 8:58 a.m. revealed that the parts in the ice machine that the ice dispenses from were covered with a brown removable substance that had water tracks leading into the ice. Interview with the Environmental Services/Maintenance Director on February 4, 2026, at 9:14 a.m. confirmed the above-mentioned observations. He stated that the ice machines are on a cleaning schedule quarterly and that the first floor ice machine was cleaned January 28, 2026, as per the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include:.The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending February 7, 2025, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending February 5, 2026, identified repeated deficiencies related to professional nursing services, safe environment free of accident hazards, proper intravenous care, and timely nurse aide performance reviews. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding quality of care cited during the survey ending February 7, 2025, revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident representative in advance of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication (medications that affect the persons mental state, emotions and behavior) use and the treatment alternatives prior to initiating the administration of the medication for four of 40 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 31, 50 and 92 ). Findings include: A facility policy related to psychotropic medications, dated January 19, 2026, indicated that prior to initiating antipsychotic medications, the facility will evaluate the resident's physical, behavioral, mental, and psychosocial signs and symptoms to identify and rule out any underlying medical conditions, including the assessment of relative benefits and risks, and the preferences and goals for treatment and review the risks versus benefits with the resident and/or responsible party and obtain consent. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call bells were within reach for three of 40 residents reviewed (Residents 50, 95 and 97).Findings include: A review of the facility's call bell policy, dated January 19, 2026, indicated that every resident living at the facility will have a means of communicating with staff from their room when they are in need of assistance. Every resident should have the peace of mind knowing that they can summon assistance regardless of their physical limitations. Each call bell is to be strategically located so that it is within the reach of the resident whether lying on their bed or sitting in a chair in their room. Pressure sensitive call bells are available for those residents who have limited dexterity and cannot push the call bell button. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for three of 40 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 9, 92)Findings include:The facility's medication administration policy, dated January 19, 2026, indicated that medications were to be administered in accordance with the physician's orders, including any required time frame.A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated November 21, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, had pressure ulcers, and received an antibiotic intravenously.A physician's note for Resident 3, dated November 18, 2025, revealed that the resident had a wound to the left heal that continued to decline. A physician's order was received to administer 3.375 grams of Piperacillin-Tazobactam intravenously every six hours for a left heel wound infection for 14 days.Review of the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, including an incident report, as well as observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that fall prevention interventions were in place as care planned for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 31), and that a thorough investigation was conducted to determine the safety of the shower chair for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 66). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding fall management, dated January 19, 2026, indicated that the purpose was to reduce the risk of falls and prevent injury. The facility would mitigate accidents by providing an environment that remains as free of hazards as possible over which the facility has control and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistive devices. The facility identifies each resident at risk for accidents and/or falls and adequately plans care and implements procedures to manage avoidable accidents.A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 31,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that interventions were in place to prevent urinary tract infections for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 3) who had an indwelling urinary catheter.Findings include:The facility policy for urinary catheters, dated January 19, 2026, revealed that clean technique was to be used when handling the catheter, tubing or drainage bag.A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated November 21, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for daily care needs, was frequently incontinent of urine, had pressure ulcers, and had diagnoses that included dementia.Physician's orders for Resident 3, dated December 24, 2025, included an order for the resident to have an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted and held in the bladder to drain urine) for wound healing. Observations of Resident 3 on February 5,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that long-term intravenous catheters were flushed per physician's order and facility policy for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 120).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding the flushing of peripheral (PICC) and midline intravenous catheters (a catheter that is placed in a peripheral vein for long-term administration of fluids and/or medication), dated January 19, 2026, indicated that the peripheral or midline catheter was to be flushed with 10 cubic centimeters (cc's) of normal saline (sterile salt and water solution) every shift and after each use with 5-10 cc's of normal saline and 5 cc's of Heparin (blood thinner), if physician's orders indicated.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 120, dated December 11, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, was understood and able to understand others, required assistance with care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that there was a physician's order for oxygen therapy for two of 40 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 24).Findings include: The facility's policy for oxygen use, dated January 19, 2026, revealed that residents who required oxygen would have a physician's order which included the oxygen flow rate, how the oxygen would be administered (i.e. nasal cannula or mask), if humidified air was required, and how often the oxygen tubing should be changed.A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated November 9, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, used oxygen, and had diagnoses that included pulmonary embolism (blood clot that goes to lungs). Nursing notes, dated November 7 at 10:46 a.m., November 10 at 11:14 a.m., November 12 at 10:35 p.m., November 15 at 11:02 a.m., and November 16, 2025, at 10:17 a.m., revealed the resident was using 3 liters per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months for one of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 2). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding performance evaluations, dated January 19, 2026, indicated that performance evaluations were to be completed for all employees annually.A review of the annual performance evaluation for Nurse Aide 2 revealed the evaluation was completed on September 21, 2024. As of February 5, 2026, there was no documented evidence that an annual performance evaluation had been completed since September 21, 2024. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on February 5, 2026, at 12:36 p.m. confirmed that the annual performance evaluation was not completed as required for Nurse Aide 2.28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment in residents' bathrooms for three of seven residents reviewed (Residents 3, 4, 6). Findings included: The facility's policy regarding cleaning and disinfecting, dated September 1, 2024, indicated that the facility was to provide a sanitary and homelike environment. Observations of Resident 4's bathroom on April 23, 2025, at 11:25 a.m. revealed that the base of the toilet, where the toilet and the floor meet, had a heavy accumulation of dried, yellowish/brown, removable debris. This debris was noted to encompass all sides of the toilet base. Observations of Resident 3's bathroom on April 23, 2025, at 11:57 a.m. revealed that the entire base of the toilet had an accumulation of dried, crusted, yellowish debris, with pieces of caulking coming off. Interview with the Maintenance Director on April 23, 2025, at 12:05 p.m. confirmed that the floor around the toilet bases in Residents 3's and 4's bathroom were in need of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for nine of 43 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 9, 12, 18, 45, 58, 85, 88, 131). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides guidance and instructions for the completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that the intent of Section N was to record the number of days, during the seven days of the assessment period, that any type of injection, insulin, and/or select medications were received by the resident. Sections N0145B antianxiety, N0415F Antibiotic, N0415G Diuretic, N0415H Opioid (narcotic medications used to treat pain), and N0415K anticonvulsant medications were to be coded if the resident took the medication during the seven-day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated/revised to reflect specific care needs for three of 43 residents reviewed (Residents 8, 26, 42). Findings include: A facility policy for care plans, dated September 12, 2024, indicated that care plans will be reviewed and revised as necessary by the interdisciplinary team at least quarterly after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) or more often as changes occur. An annual MDS assessment for Resident 8, dated December 21, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance with care needs, used oxygen, and had a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis or weakness to one side of the body due to brain injury). A respiratory care plan for Resident 8, dated December 19, 2024, indicated that the resident was to be provided oxygen as ordered. A nursing note for Resident 8, dated January 25, 2025, at 3:54 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, facility policies, clinical records, and facility investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to correctly transcribe physician's orders for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 9), and failed to ensure that a licensed practical nurse followed professional standards regarding the administration of medications for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 81). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was responsible for assessing human responses and plans, implementing nursing care, analyzing/comparing data with the norm in determining care needs, and carrying out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment (mandated to assess the resident abilities and care needs) for Resident 9, dated January…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician's orders for two of 43 residents reviewed (Residents 10, 57). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated September 12, 2024, revealed that medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. The individual administering the medication must check the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dose, right time, and method (route) of administration before giving the medication. Physician's orders for Resident 10, dated December 22, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive one 10 milligram (mg) tablet of Midodrine (used to treat low blood pressure (hypotension) three times a day for hypotension, and staff was to hold the medication if the resident's systolic blood pressure (the top number of the blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to flush a PICC line (a tube placed in a vein that can be used to deliver fluids and/or medications) and a peripheral intravenous catheter (a small, thin tube inserted into a vein in the arm, hand or foot to administer medications and/or fluids) as ordered by the physician for two of 43 residents reviewed (Residents 8, 117), failed to administer intravenous fluids as ordered by the physician for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 8), and failed to change PICC line dressing as ordered by the physician for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 122). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding PICC line dressing changes, dated September 12, 2024, indicated that the PICC's will be flushed every shift and after each use with five to 10 cubic centimeters (cc) of normal sterile saline (NSS - a mixture of water and salt with a salt concentration of 0.9 percent) and five cc of Heparin (used to prevent and treat blood clots) if the physician's orders indicate.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for medications were followed, resulting in significant medication errors for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 3), and failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 81). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated September 12, 2024, revealed that medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. The individual administering medications must check the resident's identity before giving the resident his/her medications. Methods of identifying the resident include: checking identification band, checking photograph attached to the medical record, and if necessary, verify resident identification with other facility personnel. The individual administering the medication must check the label…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for three of 43 residents reviewed (Residents 45, 117, 122). Findings include: A significant Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 45, dated November 25, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, required oxygen therapy, and had diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), high blood pressure, right femur fracture, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of nurse aide documentation of care for Resident 45, dated December 2024 and January 2025, revealed that the resident was to be showered each Monday and Friday evening. Documentation for Resident 45 for December 2, 9, 13, 16, 20, 23, 27,30, 2024, and January 3, 6, 10, 13, 17, 20, 24 and 31, 2025, indicated not applicable for showers/bath. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated interdisciplinary team member obtained the required information from the contracted hospice provider for three of 43 hospice residents reviewed (Residents 18, 57, 93). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding Hospice services (a type of end-of-life care that includes physical, emotional, and spiritual support for people with terminal illnesses), dated September 12, 2024, revealed that Hospice will provide the skilled nursing facility within 48 to 72 hours of admission the following: A copy of the physician's certification of terminal illness (a form signed by the resident's hospice physician and specific to each patient); a copy of the Hospice agreement signed by the resident/resident's legal representative; and a copy of the Hospice coordinated plan of care. The Hospice documents will be a part of the resident's medical record and filed either on the chart or in a separate folder, which remains with the chart.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending March 7, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility-maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending February 7, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies related to a failure to complete accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs); failure to update residents' care plans; failure to provide professional nursing services; failure to provide quality care; failure to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for four of 43 residents reviewed (Residents 10, 27, 65, 93). Findings include: CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's - bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics, and these antibiotics can no longer be used to control or kill the bacteria), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP's) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and resident's representative in writing of the transfer and reason for hospitalization for three of 43 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 45, 93). This deficiency was cited as past noncompliance. Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated November 29, 2024, indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, required assistance from staff for personal care needs, and had diagnoses that included a displaced trimalleolar fracture of the left lower leg (fracture in the ankle joint on the left leg). A physician's note for Resident 3, dated November 19, 2024, at 5:17 p.m., revealed that the resident had fallen in her room and had an obvious left ankle deformity. She was transferred to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. There was no documented evidence that a written notice of Resident 3's transfer to the hospital was provided to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy to the resident and/or the resident's representative at the time of a transfer for three of 43 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 45, 93). This deficiency was cited as past noncompliance. Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated November 29, 2024, indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, required assistance from staff for personal care needs, and had diagnosis that included a displaced trimalleolar fracture of the left lower leg (fracture in the ankle joint on the left leg). A physician's order note for Resident 3, dated November 19, 2024, at 5:17 p.m., revealed that the resident had fallen in her room and had an obvious left ankle deformity. She was transferred to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. There was no documented evidence that a bed-hold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive resident-centered care plans were developed and implemented for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 45). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated September 12, 2024, indicated that the facility will create a person-centered care plan including necessary and appropriate care, attending physician orders, services and accommodation of resident needs and preferences in order for the resident to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 45, dated November 25, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, required oxygen therapy, and had diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), high blood pressure, right femur…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that assistance devices to prevent accidents or injury were in place for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 88). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 88, dated January 7, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia. Review of Resident 88's care plan, dated October 4, 2024, indicated that the resident was at risk for falling. An intervention, dated October 22, 2024, indicated that the resident was to wear hipsters when out of bed. Review of a nurse's note for Resident 88, dated November 9, 2024, at 9:34 p.m., revealed that the resident was observed lying on the floor in the solarium on B hall and he was not wearing hipsters. Review of a nurse's note for Resident 88, dated January 31, 2025, at 4:12 p.m., revealed that the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed annually based on hire dates for one of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 4). Findings include: A list of nurse aides provided by the facility revealed that based on their months and days of hire, an annual performance evaluation for Nurse Aide 4 was due by April 8, 2024. However, there was no documented evidence that an annual performance evaluation was completed between March 15, 2023, and January 15, 2025, as required for this nurse aide. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on February 7, 2025, at 11:09 a.m. confirmed that an annual performance evaluation was not completed as required for Nurse Aide 4. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate accounting of controlled medications (medications with the potential to be abused) for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 80). Findings include: Physician's orders for Resident 80, dated July 16, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive one 50 milligram (mg) tablet of Tramadol (a narcotic medication to treat moderate to severe pain) every six hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. Resident 80's controlled drug logs for December 2024 and January 2025 revealed that staff signed out doses of Tramadol for administration to the resident on December 9, 2024, at 9:00 a.m.; December 20, 2024, at 9:00 a.m.; December 23, 2024, at 9:00 a.m.; December 29, 2024, at 9:00 a.m.; January 11, 2025, at 8:30 p.m.; January 12, 2025, at 9:00 a.m.; and on January 16, 2025, at 9:40 a.m. However, the resident's clinical record, including the Medication Administration Records (MARs) and the nursing notes, revealed no documented evidence that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, manufacturer's instructions, and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to securely store medication for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 57), and failed to label multi-dose containers of medications with the date they were opened in one of three medication carts observed (Third floor medication cart). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated September 12, 2024, revealed that residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of the resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 57, dated December 17, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood and could understand others. A care plan for the resident, dated April 9, 2024, revealed that the resident was on diuretic therapy (medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments for seven of 41 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 49, 68, 87, 90, 122, 124). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, revealed that if the pneumococcal (pneumonia) vaccine was not received, Section O0300C (pneumococcal vaccine) was to be coded with the reason the pneumonia vaccine was not received. The section was to be coded with a one (1) if the resident was not eligible (medical contraindication); two (2) if the vaccine was offered and declined; or (3) if the vaccine was not offered. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 1, dated January 5, 2024 revealed that Section O0300B was coded with not assessed, no information. However, a pneumococcal consent/declination form,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify physician's orders for pain management for one of 41 residents reviewed (Resident 19). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. Physician's orders for Resident 19, dated January 17, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive one 10-325 milligrams (mg) tablet of Norco (a narcotic pain medication) every six hours for moderate to severe pain (4-10) (on a scale of 0 to 10 where 10 is the worst pain). The order did not include instructions for the staff to give the Norco when the resident's pain rating was 0 to 3,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a tube feeding was administered in accordance with the facility's policy for one of 41 residents reviewed (Resident 122). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding enteral feeding (nutritional formula provided via a tube inserted into the stomach), dated October 6, 2023, indicated that nursing staff will check and document for residual volume prior to administering the feeding. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 122, dated January 25, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required minimal assistance from staff for all daily care needs, and had a feeding tube (a tube surgically implanted into the stomach for feeding). Review of Resident 122's clinical record from January 18, 2024, through March 4, 2024, revealed that there was no documented evidence that gastric residuals were checked prior to administering tube feedings per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that non-pharmacological (non-medication) interventions were attempted prior to the administration of anti-anxiety medications for one of 41 residents reviewed (Resident 79). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 79, dated December 27, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, received antianxiety medication, and had diagnoses that included dementia. Physician's orders, dated December 17, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 0.5 milligrams/milliliter (mg/mL) of lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) gel applied to the inner wrist topically every eight hours as needed for anxiety, and physician's orders, dated January 18, 2024, included orders for the resident to receive 0.5 mg of Ativan (an antianxiety medication) every eight hours as needed for anxiety. Physician's orders, dated February 1, 2024, included orders for the resident to receive 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items at appetizing temperatures. Findings include: The facility's current policy regarding food temperatures and resident tray audits, dated October 6, 2023, indicated that the facility's standards for test tray temperatures were to be 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or higher for soups, hot cereals, eggs, pancakes/waffles/French toast, entree/casseroles, starches, and vegetables; 120 to 160 degrees F for hot beverages; and 41 degrees F and lower for salads, desserts, fruit, juice, and milk. Interview with Resident 12 on March 4, 2024, at 12:51 p.m. revealed that he does not like the taste of the food. Interview with Resident 45 on March 4, 2024, at 11:45 a.m. revealed that the French fries she receives are cold, and that she threw up when she had the liver and onions. Observations in the main kitchen on March 6, 2024, revealed that the Second Floor second cart left the main kitchen at 11:39 a.m. and arrived on the Second Floor at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to store food under sanitary conditions, failing to ensure that food was served under sanitary conditions, and failing to ensure that ice was made and stored in sanitary ice machines for one of four ice machines (Second Floor Nourishment Station). Findings include: Observations in the walk-in freezer on March 4, 2024, at 9:09 a.m. and March 6, 2024, at 11:05 a.m. revealed that there was an accumulation of ice on the ceiling, the floor, and metal storage racks, as well as on cases of asparagus cuts and tips, fresh frozen brussel sprouts, and breaded popcorn shrimp that were stored on the shelves below the freezer condenser. Interview with the Registered Dietitian on March 6, 2024, at 11:05 a.m. confirmed that there was an accumulation of ice on the food products stored below the freezer condensers in the walk-in freezer. Review of the main kitchen's daily floor cleaning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of correction for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) surveys ending April 13, 2023, and July 27, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending March 7, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to freedom from abuse/neglect, accuracy of Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessments, services provided to meet professional standards, quality of care, safety and accidents hazards, palatability of food, food procurement/storage/preparation, and infection control. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of guidance from the Pennsylvania Department of Health (DOH) and review of the facility's policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control standards and DOH guidelines to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination. Findings include: Pennsylvania Department of Health, COVID-19 Infection Control and Outbreak Response Toolkit for Long-Term Care (LTC), dated February 2024, revealed that personal protective equipment (PPE) is a key component of infection prevention practices in LTCF's. PPE is equipment that is worn to minimize exposure to hazards that may cause workplace harm or illness. In LTCF's and other medical settings, health care professionals (HCP) are to wear PPE to protect them from potentially infectious conditions. This includes equipment such as respirators, masks, gowns, gloves, and eye protection. While having the recommended PPE is important to protect the wearer, it is equally critical to ensure the wearer knows how to appropriately don (put on) and doff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse for two of 41 residents reviewed (Residents 88, 115). Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated October 6, 2023, indicated that each resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and exploitation. A comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 88, dated January 9, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance from staff for all his care needs. Resident 88's care plan, dated December 21, 2023, indicated that the resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Facility documents, undated, revealed that Nurse Aide 1 completed the nurse aide training program on December 22, 2023, and that he received education on abuse, resident rights, and resident psychosocial needs in the nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow its abuse policy regarding the immediate release of an involved staff member from their duty pending a full investigation, to protect the resident/victim for two of 41 residents reviewed (Residents 88, 115) and to implement its abuse prohibition policies regarding verifying new employees' standing with the Pennsylvania Nurse Aide Registry or the State Board of Nursing for two of five new employees reviewed (Nurse Aide 11, Registered Nurse 12). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding abuse, dated October 6, 2023, indicated that every complaint or allegation of resident abuse or neglect shall be promptly reported to the immediate supervisor of the area, and the Nursing Home Administrator and/or his/her designee. Each report shall be treated promptly and with discretion, with the following priorities of concern: protection of the person and rights of the resident (alleged victim); compliance with pertinent laws and regulations; protection of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to revise resident care plans with individualized interventions to address their care needs for one of 41 residents reviewed (Resident 49). Findings include: A facility policy for pacemakers (a small, battery-powered device that prevents the heart from beating too slowly), dated October 6, 2023, revealed that the facility will place the physician's orders for pacemaker monitoring on the resident's care plan. An admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 49, dated February 19, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood and could understand others, was cognitively intact, required maximum assistance with dressing and toilet use, and had diagnoses of coronary artery disease and heart failure. The current care plan for Resident 49 revealed that he had a pacemaker; however, there was no documented evidence of an appointment for pacemaker monitoring. Interview with the Registered Nurse Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medications as ordered by the physician for one of 41 residents reviewed (Resident 107). Findings include: Physician's orders for Resident 107, dated December 14, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 10 milligrams (mg) of Oxycodone HCL every six hours as needed for pain. However, the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January 2024 revealed that the resident was administered 5 mg Oxycodone on January 17 and January 20, 2024, and not the 10 mg that was ordered. Interview with Registered Nurse 6 on March 7, 2024, at 2:43 p.m. confirmed that Resident 107 only received 5 mg of Oxycodone on January 17 and 20, 2024, and not the 10 mg he was ordered. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing Services.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that fall prevention interventions were in place as ordered and care planned for one of 41 residents reviewed (Resident 19). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 19, dated December 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand, had a diagnosis which included a cerebral vascular accident (CVA - commonly known as a stroke), and had two or more falls with no injuries since his admission to the facility. A care plan for the resident, dated December 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was at risk for falls and that the resident was to have bilateral fall mats. Physician's orders for Resident 19, dated November 28, 2023, included an order for the resident to have bilateral fall mats. Nursing notes for Resident 19, dated December 4, 2023, and January 1, 2, 6, 7, and 8, 2024, revealed that staff entered the resident's room and found the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a safety assessment for one of 41 residents reviewed (Resident 49) who used top side rails for mobility. Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 49, dated February 19, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood and could understand, and had a diagnosis of arthritis (inflammation or swelling of one or more joints). Observations of Resident 49 lying in his bed on March 6, 2024, at 10:06 a.m. revealed that the bed had bilateral top side rails. A review of Resident 49's clinical record revealed no documented evidence that a side rail safety assessment had been conducted prior to the use of bilateral top side rails for mobility purposes. An interview with Nursing Home Administrator on March 7, 2024, at 11:04 a.m. confirmed that a side rail safety assessment was not completed for Resident 49 and should have been. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, review of pharmacy labels for medications, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly labeled for one of 41 residents reviewed (Resident 107). Findings include: Physician's orders for Resident 107, dated December 14, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 10 milligrams (mg) of Oxycodone HCL (narcotic pain medication) every six hours as needed for pain. Review of the label on Resident 107's pill card of Oxycodone revealed that the card contained 5 mg tablets and the resident was to receive only one tablet every six hours as needed for pain. Interview with Registered Nurse 6 on March 7, 2024, at 2:43 p.m. confirmed that Resident 107's current physician's order for Oxycodone did not match the label on the card of Oxycodone and it should have. 28 Pa. Code 211.9(h) Pharmacy Services.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$26,685 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $13,342 — penalty dated 2025-06-12
  • $13,343 — penalty dated 2025-06-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DELOZIER, ARTHURIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/12/2013
DUGGAN, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/01/2010
LAKE, BLAIRIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2025
WALDROP, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/08/2022
CHR CONSULTING SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/22/2022
PREMIER THERAPY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2014
SOMERSET CARE INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/08/2022
TOPKA, MAKENNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/07/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-31.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$525K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 92%Medicare 2%Other / private 6%

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $525K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$475per resident / day
operating cost
$14,444per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$362per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395830. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next