Naamans Creek Country Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 227 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 36.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 143 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 72.7 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based upon observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate storage, labeling, and dating was completed for pre-prepared food items in the refrigerator. Observation of the facility refrigerator located in the kitchen on June 24, 2026, at 12:48 p.m. revealed a clear plastic container filled with prepared chicken salad sandwiches. The container was covered with a loose sheet of parchment paper, held in place with a plastic bucket of chicken salad. Interview with the kitchen manager on June 24, 2026, at 12:50 p.m. confirmed that the prepared sandwiches were not properly labeled, dated, or covered. The facility failed to ensure that food was stored properly, labeled, and dated according to professional standards. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility policy, clinical records, observation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents received the necessary services to prevent/treat pressure ulcers (injuries to the skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure to the skin) for one of one resident (Residents R27). Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated May 2, 2026, with the diagnoses of aphasia (language disorder that affects communication), vascular dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation (a neurocognitive disorder caused by damage to the brain from reduced or interrupted blood flow due to cerebrovascular disease, resulting in impaired memory, thinking, judgment, and the ability to perform daily activities), muscle weakness, and diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain and monitor weights for one of eight residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident R9). Review of facility policy Weighing of Residents .If the resident exhibits a weight change of 5 lbs. from the previous weight (weights over 100#) in the monthly weight report, the resident shall be re-weighed within 24 hours and the re-weight shall be recorded, The licensed nurse or designee should then strike out the previous weight to identify that a re-weight was obtained and verified. Review of Resident R9's clinical record revealed recorded weights of:February 4, 2026: 191.2 lbsFebruary 5, 2026: 191.2 lbsMarch 13, 2026: 168.2 lbsApril 2, 2026: 240.0 lbsApril 4, 2026: 191.0 lbsFurther review of Resident R9's clinical record revealed a dietary note dated March 19, 2026, indicating the resident's weight. Further review of the same dietary note revealed a recommendation of reweight requested for the March 13, 2026, weight.Interview with Registered Dietitian on June 25, 2026, at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food stored in the walk-in freezer was properly stored to prevent contamination and ensure safe storage in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. (Main Kitchen) Findings include: Observations in the kitchen on April 13, 2026, at 10:10 a.m. in the presence of the Assistant Food Service Director (AFSD) revealed a large accumulation of ice on the ceiling of the freezer with some ice extending on to the boxes on the top shelf labelled; pancakes; Portico seafood and Vegetable blend. Interview with AFSD on April 13, 2026, at 10:15am confirmed that the ice build up should not be there The above findings were conveyed with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on April 13, 2026, at 11:30am and confirmed the above findings. 28 Pa. Code 211.6(f) Dietary services.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility policies, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for two of two nursing units (First Floor and Second Floor nursing units). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Dry Food Storage dated May 30, 2025, revealed, dry food storage is necessary for foods that do not require refrigeration or freezing and requires proper guidelines. All food items must be dated, labeled and sealed. Rotate products to ensure that the oldest inventory is used first. Observation on April 29, 2025, at 9:45 a.m. of the second-floor kitchen dry food storage area revealed expired used by dates for multiple loaves of bread and packages of buns. This included, 1 package of hot dog buns use by dated April 8, 2025, 1 loaf of wheat bread use by dated April 27, 2025, 1 loaf of raisin bread use by dated April 25, 2025, 5 packages of hamburger buns use by dated April 26, 2025, of which 2 packages revealed black and green spots on the buns, and 9 loaves of rye…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for three of the 18 residents reviewed (Residents 13, 14, and 66). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Weighing of Residents, undated revealed that residents requiring daily weights due to clinical conditions warranting strict monitoring will be weighed in the same procedures as stated above. Documentation of the daily weight will be recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR). If the resident experiences a weight gain of three (3) pounds in a 24-hour period or a weight gain of greater than five (5) pounds in a week, the licensed nurse will notify the physician. Clinical records review revealed Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF weakened heart condition that causes fluid buildup in the feet, arms, lungs, and other organs). A review of Resident 13's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility's policy, clinical records review and staff interviews, it was determine that the facility failed to appropriately monitor the weights and timely address identified significant weight changes for three of 18 Residents reviewed (Resident 63, 66 and 175). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Weighing of Residents, undated, revealed that the facility must monitor the resident's weight to detect significant weight loss or gain to ensure that the resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status. The same policy revealed that upon admission and readmission, the resident is weighed weekly for one month. An assigned licensed nurse or designee should review resident weights after they are entered or recorded. If the resident exhibits a change of five (5) pounds from the previous month's weight report and three (3) pounds from the previous weight report, the resident shall be reweighed within 24 hours and the re-weight shall be recorded. If the weight change falls into the significant category- 5% in one month or 10% in six…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident out of 24 sampled was free of chemical restraints (Resident 63). Findings include: A review of Resident 63's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on January 24, 2025, with diagnoses to include cerebral infraction (pathologic process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain), cognitive communication deficit (difficulties in communication that arise from impairments in cognitive processes such as attention, memory, perception, and executive function), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). An admission Minimum Data Set assessment (a federally mandated standardized assessment completed periodically to plan resident care) dated January 24, 2025, indicated that the resident is moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS (brief interview to assess cognitive status) score of 12 (8-12 represents moderate cognitive impairment). A review of resident 63's clinical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the pharmacy failed to ensure medication for wound care was available for one of the four residents reviewed (Resident 175). Findings include: A review of Resident 175's physician order dated April 29, 2025, revealed an order for Santyl (A topical medication used for removing damaged or burned skin to allow for wound healing and growth of healthy skin) ointment, apply nickel thick layer to the sacrum (The triangular bone just below the lumbar vertebrae) wound bed after cleansing with normal saline solution, cover with foam dressing once a day and as needed. May use Medihoney (A dressing that aids and support debridement and a moist wound healing environment in acute and chronic wounds and burns.) until Santyl arrives. An observation of the wound care treatment conducted on May 1, 2025, at 9:45 a.m., revealed that Medihoney treatment was used for the sacral wound instead of the Santyl. An interview with licensed nurse Employee E4 conducted on May 1, 2025, at 9:50 a.m., revealed that the facility was still…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was served under sanitary conditions and failed to prevent cross-contamination for one of 12 resident observed during lunch (Resident R7). Findings include: Observations conducted on September 24, 2024 at 12:15 p.m. in the main dining area on the second floor during the lunch meal tray line, revealed Licensed (LPN) Employee E1 removed R7's tray from the tray cart which revealed a soiled cloth towel on the tray touching the plate containing R7's meal. Further observation on September 24, 2024 revealed licensed Employee E1 returned from the kitchen at 12:18 p.m. with a new tray and meal for R7. Interview conducted with the Dietary Manager, on September 24, 2024, at 12:45 p.m. confirmed the soiled towel should not have been on R7's tray and reported that it was an accident. Interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on September 24, 2024, at 12:55 p.m. confirmed that all resident trays should be free of soiled cloth towels. 28 Pa. Code…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $183K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA