No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pavilion At Brmc, The

200 Pleasant Street, Bradford, PA 16701 · Non profit - Corporation · 95 certified beds · (814) 362-8293 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 362-8293 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 20242 actual-harm citations$16,316 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2024
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • the CMS record shows $16,316 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-06)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
195 Pleasant St · (814) 363-2760 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
102 Main St · (814) 362-3827 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
(814) 362-4418 · Call to confirm hours
Park
82 Poplin Ave · (814) 368-8190 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.8%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.3%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury8.8%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.8%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.5%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.2%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.7%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.8%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.1%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.7%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.761.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.531.181.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
41.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 41.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.4%CMS range 34.3–58.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.8–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge41.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge37.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified87.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 3.1–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.22
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.34
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.78
RN hoursweekends
41.7%
Total nursing turnover
52.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 50.6 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.22 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.05 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.57 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.41 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-23)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2024-12-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, facility documentation and clinical record, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of 19 residents reviewed was free of neglect during care (Resident R5). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property policy, last reviewed 12/28/2023, revealed Neglect: The indifference or disregard for resident care, comfort or safety, resulting in or may result in physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should have been aware of goods or services that a resident requires but the facility fails to provide them to the resident resulting in, or may result in physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Review of facility policy entitiled Fall Protocol, with a policy review date of 12/28/2023, revealed that it is the policy of the Pavilion at BRMC to make every attempt…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide proper resident supervision during toileting that resulted in a fall with actual harm of a fracture of the neck (C2 vertebrae) for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident R5). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitiled Fall Protocol, with a policy review date of 12/28/23, revealed that it is the policy of the Pavilion at BRMC to make every attempt at preventing residents from falling. Review of Resident R5's clinical record revealed an admission date of 2/14/2011, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), major depressive disorder (a mental disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), history of seizures, muscle weakness, hearing loss, chronic pain, history of falling, age…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the attending physician documented required visits by writing, signing, and dating a physician progress note for each visit for four of 14 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R6, and R30). Findings include: Facility policy entitled Physician Visit Scheduled dated 11/28/25, revealed All attending physicians will visit the residents of the Pavilion at BRMC once monthly and document a progress note relative to the MD visit. Resident R1 was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included Dementia (loss of cognitive functioning affecting a person's memory and behaviors), Wernicke Encephalopathy (Neurological Disorder caused by severe deficiency of thiamine leading to brain dysfunction. Commonly seen in people with chronic alcohol abuse, malnutrition and conditions that impair nutrient absorption), and High Blood Pressure. Resident R1's clinical record revealed physician progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary operations and standards for food safety in one of two resident unit freezers reviewed (Third Floor).Findings include: Observations on 4/21/26, at 11:26 a.m. of the Third Floor freezer revealed two ice packs that are used for treatments on residents stored next to frozen microwave meals. During an interview on 4/21/26, at 11:26 a.m. Certified Nursing Assistant Employee E1 confirmed that the ice packs used as treatments for residents were in the freezer with food. He/she confirmed that ice packs used as treatments should not be stored in the same unit with food. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, facility grievances, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide acknowledgement of a complaint/grievance and actively work toward resolution of that complaint/grievance for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents R9 and R11). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Pavilion Complaint/Grievance Policy, dated 12/28/23, revealed that the Pavilion grievance official will oversee the Pavilion grievance process, receive and track grievances through their conclusion, will lead any necessary investigation by the facility, will maintain confidentiality of all information associated with grievances, will be responsible in issuing written grievance decision to the resident/resident representative and will coordinate with state and federal agencies as necessary in light of specific allegations. The grievance official of the Pavilion will also take immediate action to prevent potential violation of any resident right while the alleged violation is being investigated. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident dignity by placing a wander guard bracelet (a device with a small box on a plastic bracelet placed on an at risk wandering person to alert the staff if that person attempts to exit the facility without staff supervision) on one of two residents reviewed for wander guard usage (Resident R24). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled General Safety Practices at The Pavilion dated 12/28/2023, revealed All residents at risk for elopement will be placed on the second floor and a wander guard bracelet will be initiated. Review of Resident R24's clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/15/16, with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure (a condition where the heart cannot supply the body with enough blood), presence of artificial knee joint, and edema (swelling to an area of body due to holding excessive fluid). Review of residents that reside on the second floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was completed correctly to indicate the code status as Full Code (CPR/Attempt Resuscitation) or Do Not Resuscitate (DNR/Do Not Attempt Resuscitation-Allow Natural Death) for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident R39). Findings include: Review of a facility policy Advance Directives-Health Care Proxy, MOLST/POLST, Living Will dated [DATE], revealed All adult individuals in New York State and in Pennsylvania have the right to self-determination in Health Care and the right to express their preferences regarding health care treatment, including decisions to continue or refuse routine or major medical treatment, as well as life-sustaining treatment without which the individual is expected to die. Advance directives such as health care proxies (HCP), living wills and consents to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders allow an adult to express his/her healthcare treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan regarding the use of side rails for one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident R32). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Resident Care Plan dated 12/28/23, indicated that the facility will develop a comprehensive care plan of care to reflect the needs of the resident, be individualized and resident driven, and utilize nursing assessments, evaluations, etc. Resident R32's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/19/16, with diagnoses that included dementia, generalized muscle weakness, heart disease, arthritis, and limitations of activities due to disability. Current physician's orders for January 2024, indicated that Resident R32 was to have siderails up on both sides of his/her bed to promote independence with bed mobility and transfers. The clinical record lacked evidence of a care plan to address his/her side rail use. Review of Resident R32's clinical record documentation the daily use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to administer supplemental oxygen as ordered and promote cleanliness regarding respiratory care equipment according to physician orders for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident R17). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Care of Oxygen Tubing/Nebulizer Tubing and Filters dated 12/28/23, indicated that oxygen concentrator filters will be cleaned monthly. Review of a facility policy entitled Medication Administration dated, 12/28/23, revealed that medications shall be administered in accordance with the orders of the prescribing Healthcare Practitioner, and oxygen administration must have a physician order, the order must be written on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the nurse is to monitor oxygen flow rate every shift. Resident R17's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/25/14, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records and facility policy, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed thoroughly review and assess the use of bed rails prior to their use and review the risk versus benefits of using bed rails with the resident's representative and obtain informed consent for the installation and use of bed rails prior to the installation for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents R32 and R67). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Side Rails and Use of ½ Side Rails dated 12/28/23, indicated that half side rails may be utilized to assist a resident with bed mobility and transfers or to assist the resident with bed controls but only after an individual Side Rail assessment is completed on admission, quarterly, annually, and as needed. Resident R32's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/19/16, with diagnoses that included dementia, generalize muscle weakness, heart disease, arthritis, and limitations of activities due to disability.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records and facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination during a dressing change for one of 19 residents (Resident R32). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Standard Precautions dated 12/28/23, revealed that staff are expected to change their gloves between tasks and procedures on the same patient after contact with material that may contain a high concentration of microorganisms, and remove gloves promptly after use, before touching non-contaminated items and environmental surfaces. Observation of wound care on 1/03/24, at 3:12 p.m. revealed that Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E3 performed hand hygiene and donned (put on) clean gloves; removed the soiled dressing containing a moderate amount of exudate (a mass of cells and fluid that has seeped out of blood vessels or an organ, especially in inflammation); picked up the multi-use bottle of wound cleanser; applied wound cleanser solution to two, four inch by four inch cotton gauzes;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-04-23 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and Minimum Data set (MDS - federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care), and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the status of three of 14 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R6, and R10). Findings include: MDS instructions for section P0200 Alarms subsection E Wander / Elopement Alarm indicated to identify all alarms that were used at any time (day or night) during the seven-day look-back period and to code the frequency of use as not used, used less than daily, or used daily. The MDS instructions further indicated that a wander / elopement alarm includes devices such as bracelets, pins/buttons worn on the resident's clothing, sensors in shoes, or building/unit exits sensors worn by/attached to the resident that activates an alarm and/or alert staff when the resident nears or exits a specific area of the building. This includes devices that are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,316 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $8,158 — penalty dated 2024-12-06
  • $8,158 — penalty dated 2024-12-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BELT, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
BOUTILLETTE, MARCIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
DEROSE, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
FERGUSON, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
FIORENTINO, LISAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
JAVED, MUHAMMEDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/05/2009
MARASCO, JULIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
PISANO, DOUGLASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
PRADHAN, ANILIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
PRINCE, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2009
RIDLEY, PAULIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
SCHOENECKER, JEANNINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
SCHOLL, MELISSAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
WITTE, GILBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
KLASS, CHERYLIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/04/2024
O'CONNELL, KATIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2022
UPPER ALLEGHENY HEALTH SYSTEMOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/19/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395355. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next