No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bristol Health & Rehab Center

905 Tower Road, Bristol, PA 19007 · For profit - Corporation · 174 certified beds · (215) 785-3201 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0741, F0744)3 immediate-jeopardy citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$428,987 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $428,987 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-18)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
501 Bath Rd # 202 · (215) 785-9272 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
416 Mill St · (215) 788-8879 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
320 Pond St · (215) 785-6391 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Lakeland Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.4%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.4%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.1%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication43.2%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.4%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.0%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table34.6%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.4%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission35.6%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.8%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.011.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.251.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery

Met the expected recovery: 55.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.5%CMS range 32.8–59.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.6–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge41.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.5–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.841.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-26)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

56 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policies, and interview with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R1) who exited through two doors that were designed to lock and one to alarm. This failure resulted in Resident R1 eloping from the facility for approximately 4 hours and placed Resident R1 at high risk for injury that resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. (Resident R1) Findings include: Facility policy titled Elopement Prevention and Management Overview (undated) indicated that the interdisciplinary team plans the least restrictive interventions to promote mobility and safety and to meet the individualized needs and goals of the resident. Components of the Elopement Prevention and Management Program include, but are not limited to, the following: elopement drills, environmental modifications to promote safety mobility with monitoring for effectiveness, protected list of names and photographs of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records, facility policies and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident R135, with a documented history of substance abuse, to prevent relapse and access to illegal substances. This failure resulted in Resident R135, accessing and using illegal substance and experiencing four incidents (December 3, 2023; December 5, 2023; March 17, 2024 and July 23, 2024) of drug overdose which required immediate medical treatment/emergency medical intervention and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R135). Findings include: Review of the facility's care plan policy titled Plan of Care Overview dated 2017, revealed it is the policy of this facility to provide each resident centered care that meets psychosocial physical and emotional needs and concerns of the resident's safety is the primary concern for all our residents staff and visitors. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records, facility policies and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide supervision for Resident R135 with documented history of substance abuse. This failure resulted in Resident R135 accessing and using illegal substance which resulted in four incidents (December 3, 2023; December 5, 2023; March 17, 2024 and July 23, 2024) of drug overdose which required immediate medical treatment / emergency medical management and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R135) Findings include: Review of facility policies and standard procedures on Individual Service Plan Overview with an effective date of May 1, 2022, reveal that under Definitions: For the purpose of this policy, that individual service plan is the written treatment provided for a resident that is resident focused and provides for optimal personalized care. Under section Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-07-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policies, observations and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one of seven residents reviewed (Resident R1) was free from neglect by not timely identifying, assessing, and providing treatment to Resident R1's right lower extremity wound. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R1, who developed a new and worsening wound on the right lower extremity, requiring transfer to the hospital and a right leg wound infection. This deficiency is identified as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of an undated facility policy, Skin Care and Wound Management Overview revealed: The facility staff strives to prevent resident skin impairment and to promote the healing of existing wounds. The interdisciplinary team works with the resident and /or family/responsible party to identify and implement interventions to prevent and treat potential skin integrity issues Each resident is evaluated upon admission and weekly thereafter for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records, facility policies, professional standards of practice, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement care and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer resulting in actual harm to Resident R1 who developed Stage II pressure ulcer to the right heel for one of 14 residents reviewed. Findings include: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality, the pressure ulcer best practice bundle incorporates three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers: Comprehensive skin assessment, standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment, and care planning and implementation to address the areas of risk. The American College of Physicians (ACP) is a national organization of internists who specialize in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of adults. Clinical Practice Guidelines indicate that the treatment of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility did not complete a comprehensive care plan related to hearing loss for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include: Interview with the Registered Nurse and Unit Manager, Employee E3, conducted don July 31, 2025, revealed that Resident R1 is hard of hearing at times and he tells me he cannot hear me. Interview with Resident R1 conducted on July 29, 2025, at 10:30 a.m. revealed that the resident is hard of hearing. Continued interview revealed that Resident R1 received hearing aids last week but did not yet receive them this morning. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15, indicating cognitive intactness. Further review of Resident R1's clinical record titled, Audiology Consultation dated February 25, 2025, revealed that the resident had a diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, review of facility documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to preventing cross-contamination for one of eight residents reviewed (R3).Findings include:Review of Facility Policy on Skin Care and Wound Management undated indicated; application of treatment protocols based on clinical best practice standards for promoting wound healing.Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) 'Core Infection Prevention and Control Practices for Safe Healthcare Delivery in all Settings , dated April 12, 2024, insisted to maintain separation between clean and soiled equipment to prevent cross contamination. In addition, the literature on ' Wound Care Observation Checklist for Infection Control' of Pennsylvania Department of Health, dated April 2018, indicated; wound care supply cart should never enter the patient/resident's immediate care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on, review of facility policies and procedures, observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure treatment and services were provided to the resident to prevent development of wounds met the professional standards of practice for 4 of 14 residents reviewed. (Resident R1, R2, R4 and R5). Findings include: Review of an undated facility policy titled Skin Care & Wound Management, revealed Develop a care plan for pressure ulcer prevention. Consider the following interventions for a resident at moderate risk. Add further interventions as indicated. A. Sensory Perception a. Evaluate areas of skin where the resident may have impaired sensation, such as feet. b. Instruct resident to notify staff of any changes in skin condition. D. Mobility c. Position with pillows/support devices to assist in maintaining position and comfort. d. Protect/elevate elbows and heels as indicated. G. Other c. Monitor treatment plans for diseases that impact sin impairment risk. 4. Revise intervention and/or goals as indicated. Observation of Resident R4 on March…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition for two of 14 residents reviewed (Residents R6 and R7). Findings include: Review of undated facility policy entitled, Height and Weight, that . Compare weight to previous weight obtained. If a variance of 5 pounds or more is noted, reweigh resident to verify weight. Stable resident swill be weighed monthly thereafter, unless physician or diagnosis indicate otherwise, Unstable residents will be reviewed by IDT team to determine frequency of obtaining weight a. Update Interdisciplinary Care plan as needed. Weight loss concerns are reported to the practitioner and discussed at the weekly clinical meeting. Review of the weight record for Resident R6 on August 7, 2024, revealed that the resident weighed 159.0 lbs.(pounds). On September 16, 2024, the resident weighed 150 pounds which was a -5.66 % loss over one month and 10.2 % loss over 6 months. Review of the clinical record revealed that a nutritional assessment was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of clinical records, facility policies, facility documentation, interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable standard of practice for medical record documentation for one of 14 residents reviewed. (Resident R6) Findings Include: Review of undated facility policy entitled, Height and Weight, revealed that Nurses will follow the basic standards of practice for documentation including but not limited to providing a timely and accurate account of resident information in the medical record, documenting legibly in English using only acceptable medical abbreviations. Timeliness and accuracy. a. Chart in real time when an event is occurring or shortly thereafter as is practicable. b. avoid over use of late entries. Late entries may be confusing and contradictory and only use sparingly. Review of meal intake documentation for Resident R6 dated November 1, 2024, to November 30, 2024, revealed that 25 of 30 documentation of breakfast and lunch intake/consumption documentation was completed at the same time of the day. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, observations, review of facility policies and procedures and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly notify resident's physician and representative of a change in skin condition of for one of 14 residents reviewed (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of undated facility policy titled Notification of Change in Condition, revealed The center must inform the resident, consult with the resident's medical practitioner and/or notify the residents' representative, authorized family member, or legal power of attorney/guardian when there is a change requiring such notification. The medical practitioner is promptly notified of significant changes in condition, and the medical record must reflect the notification, response, and interventions implemented to address the resident's condition. When a change in condition is noted, the nursing staff will contact the resident representative. Observation of Resident R2 on March 30, 2025, at 10: 34 a.m., with Employee E4, Licensed Nurse Supervisor, revealed a dark colored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, observations, review of facility policies and procedures and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure treatment and services were provided to the resident with bilateral lower extremity venous ulcer as recommended by the physician for one of 14 residents reviewed. (Resident R3) Findings Include: Review of wound care practitioners' recommendation dated March 19, 2025, revealed a recommendation to apply tubi-grip to lower extremity daily during the day and off at night. Review of wound care practitioners' recommendation dated March 26, 2025, revealed a recommendation to apply tubi-grip to lower extremity daily during the day and off at night. Observation of Resident R3 on March 30, 2025, at 11:00 a.m., with Employee E4, Licensed Practical Nurse Supervisor, revealed that the resident was sitting in her wheelchair. Her feet was on the floor. Resident was not wearing tubi grip or any compression measures to her lower extremity. It was observed that the resident had an ulcer to the left calf area. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of clinical records, facility documentation, interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to the care of residents with PICC line ( a tube placed in a large vein in the neck, chest, groin, or arm to give fluids, blood, or medications or to do medical tests quickly) for two of two employee records reviewed. (Employee E7 and E8). Findings Include: Observation of Resident R8 on March 26, 2025, at 11:00 a.m., revealed that the resident had a left upper extremity PICC line insertion. There was no documentation on the dressing to indicate the date and time the dressing last changed. Review Resident R8's active physician order on March 26, 2025, revealed an order to measure external catheter length with dressing change. However, there was no evidence that the staff obtained or documented external catheter length. Observation of Resident R9 on March 26, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., revealed that the resident had a left upper extremity PICC line insertion. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the wound treatment and enhanced barrier precaution for 4 of 14 residents reviewed. (Resident R1, R6, R9 and R11) Findings include: Review of an undated facility policy, Enhanced Barrier Precaution, revealed that Communication to staff and visitors-post sign on the resident door indicating enhanced barrier precaution is required. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms that employs hand hygiene, targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities that include; Dressing, Bathing/showering, Transferring, Providing hygiene, Changing linens Changing briefs or assisting with toileting, Device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy ventilator, Wound care: any skin opening requiring a dressing. In general, gowns and gloves would not be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to serve foods that accommodate residents' allergies for one of 5 reviewed reviewed (Residents R1). Findings include: Interview with Resident R1 on December 26, 2024, revealed on November 18, 2024, during dining resident had a cookie on her tray. Resident R1 ate a few bits of the cookie where she realized it had peanuts in it because she started reacting to it by having an itchy throat. Resident is allergic to nuts and it was stated on her meal ticket. Nurse was informed that the resident was having trouble swallowing. The antihistaming Benadryl was administered. The Nurse practitioner was in facility and assessed hthe resident and EpiPen (medication used to treat life-threatening, allergic emergencies in people who are at risk for or have a history of serious allergic emergencies) was administered. Review of nursing notes for Resident R1 revealed a two nurses notes, dated November 18 and 19, 2024, which stated, At 17:30 (5:30 p.m.) nurse reported that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility related to the elopement of one of six residents reviewed (Residents R1) which resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated that the primary purpose of the NHA's job description is to lead the nursing home facility and is responsible for the overall management and operational oversight of the facility, ensuring that high standards of care are maintained and regulatory requirements are met. This role requires strong leadership, excellent communication skills, and a commitment to providing outstanding care to our residents. Review of the job description for the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the primary purpose of the Director of Nursing's job description is to oversee nursing services, ensure compliance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical record, interview with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receive the medications that were ordered for by their physician and do not be administer medications ordered for another resident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed. (Resident R 1) Findings Include: Review of facility policy Administering Medication states that observe the five right in giving each medication, the right resident, the right time, the right medication, the right dose and the right route. Review Physician Orders policy states medication administration record/ treatment administration record the legal medical record for recording medication and treatment. Review of Resident's R1 clinical record, revealed the diagnosis of dementia (progressive degenerative disease of the brain) without behaviors and high blood pressure. Reviewed the investigation reported revealed that on October 5, 2024, at 0900 (9:00 a.m.), resident a [AGE] year-old male with Diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that meals were served timely on two of three nursing units observed (First floor and Second floor nursing units). Findings include: Review of the facilities policy titled Dining Services Department policy and procedure Manual revealed adequate staffing will be provided to prepare and serve palatable attractive nutritiously meals at proper temperatures and at appropriate times and to support proper sanitary techniques being utilized. At least three daily meals will be provided at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community and the time between a substantial evening meal and breakfast following will not exceed 14 hours. Review of facility documentation titled Mealtimes, revealed that facility mealtimes are as follow: Breakfast at 7:00 A.M., lunch starts at 12:00 P.M. and dinner starts at 5:00 P.M. Observation of first floor dining room wall posting of mealtimes revealed breakfast is served at 8:00 a.m. lunch is served at 11:30 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, review of facility documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to infection surveillance for two of two residents reviewed with infections (Residents R154 and R33), infection data reporting, enhanced barrier precautions and infection committee meetings, and Enhanced Barrier Precaution for one of one resident reviewed (Resident R165). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Infection Prevention Program dated last reviewed February 24, 2022, revealed that the facility uses a systematic and data-driven method to prevent, track and trend infections, surveil for outbreaks and monitor infection control practices for compliance. Continued review revealed that the Infection Preventionist is responsible for monitoring infections and completing monthly line listings and report forms. The infection prevention program includes staff and resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility's policies, interview with staff and resident, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that residents were treated with dignity and respect for 1 of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R62) Findings include: Review of facility investigation report for Resident R65 from February 12, 2024, revealed that the previous administrartor was reported on February 10, 2024, that a licensed nurse Employee E20 called Resident R65 wicked b*!*h. Reviewed investigation for Resident R65 statement on February 10, 2024, revealed [licensed nurse Employee E20] came to my room and didn't knock I asked her to knock, and she pulled open the privacy curtain and didn't close it. She called me a wicked white b*!*h. I was in the hallway. This was Saturday morning. Between 6am-7am. Further reviewed investigation statement from licensed nurse Employee E20 stated did anything happen with [Resident R65] on Saturday morning? Yes, I am always having problem with [Resident R65]. Every night I have to put her on behavior monitoring when you care for B bed. I have to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to address a resident's dementia care needs for one of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R 141). Findings Include: Review of the admission sheet of Resident 141, revealed that Resident R141 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS- an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental or psychosocial needs) dated August 20, 2024, revealed that Resident R 141 had active diagnoses of Non Alzheimer's Dementia (Dementia is not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities, it is a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). Review of MDS revealed that Resident R 141 received Antipsychotic (Antipsychotic medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of five percent or greater for two of six residents observed during medication administration (Resident R33, and R89). Findings include: On September 4, 2024, at 9:33 a.m., observed that Employee E21, a Licensed Nurse, administered to Resident R89, the medicine, Artificial Tears one drop in each eye. Review of physician order for Resident R89, dated March 26, 2024, revealed an order to administer Pataday Ophthalmic Solution 0.1 % (Olopatadine HCl), instill 1 drop in both eyes, two times a day for Allergic Conjunctivitis. At the time of the observation, interview with Licensed nurse Employee E21, confirmed the above findings. On September 4, 2024, at 10:20 a.m., observed that Employee E22, a Registered Nurse, did not administer to Resident R33, the medicine busPIRone HCl Oral Tablet 5 MG (Buspirone HCl), one tablet by mouth for Anxiety and Depression, even though Employee E22 searched for the medicine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and clinical record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to correctly administer medications in accordance with physician orders, for one of six residents' medication administration observed, and one of 32 resident records reviewed resulting in significant medication error ( Resident R159). Findings include: Review of clinical records revealed that Resident R159, was admitted in the facility on July 15, 2024, with diagnoses including Acute Osteomyelitis, Right Ankle and Foot (Osteomyelitis is an infection in a bone. Infections can reach a bone by traveling through the bloodstream or spreading from nearby tissue). Review of Resident R159's nurses note dated August 8, 2024, indicated that on August 7, 2024, during the night shift, instead of the physician ordered medicine, (order dated July 15, 2024), namely Cefepime HCl Solution 1 GM/50ML 1 gram for Diabetic Foot Ulcer, a Licensed Nurse Employee E24, administered the medicine namely, DAPTOmycin Solution Reconstituted 500 MG, intravenously. (Cefepime injection is used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, observations and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were provided meals that honor food preferences for one of three nursing units. First floor). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Dining Services Department policy and procedure Manual revealed the individual tray assembly tickets will identify all food items appropriate for the resident based on diet order allergies and intolerances and preferences. During meal service, any resident with expressed or observed refusal food will be offered an alternative selection of comparable nutritional value the alternate meal selection will be provided in a timely manner. Review of facility provided menu for September 3, 2024, revealed the lunch menu planned was to be tuna melt sandwich with buttered green peas and tater tots with alternative selection was honey Dijon chicken breast, green beans and parsley rice, both options served with tropical fruit salad. Observation of dining room lunch being served on September 3rd, 2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews with staff, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stores, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety related to labeling and dating of refrigerated food items and the use of hair nets. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Dining Services Department policy and procedure Manual revealed adequate staffing will be provided to prepare and serve palatable attractive nutritiously meals at proper temperatures and at appropriate times and to support proper sanitary techniques being utilized. Proper food handling techniques to prevent contamination and temperature maintenance controls will be used for point of service dining. All staff members will have their hair off the shoulders confined in a hair net or cap and facial hair properly restrained. Per standards of the United States Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Services (last updated July 2020) regarding Left Overs and Food Safety revealed leftovers can be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the QAA (Quality Assessment and Assurance) committee meets at least quarterly to coordinate and evaluate activities under the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) program as required. Findings include: Review of facility policy, QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) Plan undated, revealed that, The facility will have a QAPI meeting every month and that, Quarterly data will be reviewed over a quarter time frame on monthly meetings following the end of a quarter. Review of facility documentation related to QAPI meetings revealed that meetings were conducted in January, July and August 2024. Documentation included attendance logs of the QAA committee, data analysis of quality measures, analysis of resident care and performance improvement projects. There was no documentation available for review at the time of the survey related to QAPI meetings for any other months in 2024. Interview on September 9,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, review of facility documentation, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program for two of two of residents reviewed for antibiotics (Residents R154 and R33). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Antibiotic Stewardship Overview dated revised March 11, 2022, revealed, The facility will provide surveillance, tracking, trending and reporting to the leadership team to optimize the use of antibiotics in this facility. Continued review revealed, Provide standardized practices for the care of a resident suspected of an infection and/or one in which antibiotics are initiated. Standardized practices are comprised of a group of broad interventions to improve antibiotic use including but not limited to: Evaluation and reporting clinical signs and symptoms improvement; optimizing the use of diagnostic testing; and implementing an antibiotic review process (antibiotic time-out)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to designate one or more individuals as the infection preventionist who work at least part time at the facility. Findings include: Review of facility policy, Infection Prevention Program dated last reviewed February 24, 2022, revealed, that an Infection Preventionist is a nurse, epidemiologist, public health professional, microbiologist, physician, or other health professional who works to prevent germs from spreading within the healthcare facility and is qualified by training and experience to oversee the infection prevention program for the facility. Continued review revealed that the Infection Preventionist's responsibilities include infection surveillance including tracking, trending and identification of specific organisms; reporting of infectious outbreaks; compliance review, provides staff education and feedback; completes the line listing of infections; completes monthly report forms and reports findings to the QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance improvement) committee.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to equip corridors with safe handrails on each side, for two of three nursing units observed (First and Second floor nursing units). Findings include: Observation of the First Floor Nursing Unit on September 3, 2024, at 10:05 a.m. revealed the following: The handrail by room [ROOM NUMBER] was broken and top part coming off. The handrail by room [ROOM NUMBER] was broken. Observation of the Second Floor Nursing Unit on September 3, 2024, at 12:51 p.m. revealed the following: The handrail by room [ROOM NUMBER] was cracked with exposed sharp edges; The handrail by room [ROOM NUMBER] was broken and covered with tape; and The handrail between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was missing. Interview on September 3, 2024, at 2:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that handrails were broken or missing and that a full audit of all handrails would be conducted. Interview on September 4, 2024, at 2:37 p.m. the Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of a misappropriation of medication to rule out neglect for one of 3 residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Pennsylvania Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation undated, indicated neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, acute kidney failure, postlaminectomy syndrome; difficult in walking, need assistance with personal care, neuromuscular dysfunctional of bladder, urinary tract infection. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated July 21, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviewof clinical record, review of facility documentation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that hospital recommendation were address for one of three clinical records reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, acute kidney failure, postlaminectomy syndrome (chronic pain following back surgery); difficult in walking, need assistance with personal care, neuromuscular dysfunctional of bladder, urinary tract infection. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated July 21, 2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. Continued review Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident developed a right heel suspected deep tissue injury on January 31, 2024. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and interventions to promote the healing of pressure ulcers for one of three sampled residents with pressure ulcers. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, acute kidney failure, postlaminectomy syndrome (condition characterized by chronic pain following back surgery); difficult in walking, need assistance with personal care, neuromuscular dysfunctional of bladder, urinary tract infection. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated July 21, 2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. Continued review Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident developed a right heel suspected deep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interview, and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility was not maintaining an effective pest control program. Findings include: During the entrance meeting with Administrator, Employee E1 on December 11, 2023, at 9:30 p.m. revealed facility has two pest control companies doing treatment at the facility. The local pest control company did twice a week treatment and a second pest control company was from out of state. Review of the pest control log it was confirmed that the last treatment was complete on December 8, 2023, treating room [ROOM NUMBER]. room [ROOM NUMBER] was last treated on November 8, 2023, from flies. There was no documentation of any residents refusing of having their room treated. On December 11, 2023, at 12:29 p.m. an interview with Resident R7 resigning in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed that he/she saw a live roach in the middle of his room. On December 11, 2023, at 12:33 p.m. an interview with Resident R5 resigning in room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Food Storage: Cold Foods dated April 2018, indicated that Freezer temperatures will be maintained at a temperature of 0 F or below. An accurate thermometer will be kept in each refrigerator and freezer. A written record of daily temperatures will be recorded. All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. Observations in the walk-in freezer with Employee E14, Food Service Director, on November 27, 2023, 9:45 a.m. revealed that the freezer thermometer was indicating a temperature of 36-degree Fahrenheit (F). There were multiple boxes and bags of different food items in the freezer including the meat items which were soft to touch. Interview with Employee E14 on November 27, 2023, 9:45 a.m. stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Review of facility documentation and interview with residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents preferences were honored on two of two floors. (2nd floor) Findings include: Review of 'Unit 2 activity calendar' for November 2023 revealed the following scheduled activities for November 28, 2023: 10:00 am coffee social 11:30 fresh air 1:30 calming coloring 2:30 fresh air/karaoke 2:45 manicures 4:00 room visits Interview with Resident R66, on November 27, 2023 at 11:30 am, revealed that staff do not assist her with going out for fresh air. Resident R66 stated that she would prefer to have fresh air breaks in non-smoking area since she is non-smoker. Interview with facility's Activities Director, Employee E11, on November 27, 2023, revealed that non-smoking residents are using smoking patio for fresh air breaks. Employee E11 stated that nursing aides are responsible for taking residents on second floor unit out for fresh air breaks. Interview with nursing staff on second floor unit, Employees E6, E7, E8, E9 and E10, on November 28, 2023 at 11:45 am,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a clean, homelike environment for two of two nursing floors of 32 residents reviewed. (Rooms 105, 120, 128, 131 and 211) Findings include: Observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] on first floor unit, on November 27, 2023 at 10:30 am, revealed stained privacy curtain, stained ceiling above bed A, and stained bed linens on bed B. Resident R3's unclean personal laundry was observed stored behind television. Observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] on second floor unit on November 27, 2023 at 11:00 am revealed stained privacy curtain. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on first floor unit on November 27, 2023 at 11:07 a.m. revealed an air conditioner with chipped painted on top of it and the wall above it had paint peeling off. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on the first floor unit on November 27, 2023 at 1:05 p.m. reaveled two wholes unrepaired on the exterior of the bathroom door. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on the first floor unit on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a formal grievance process was in place for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident R108). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Resident Grievances with a review date of May 5, 2019 states, The facility will make available to all residents posting in a prominent location in the facility information of the right to file grievances orally or in writing; the right to file grievances anonymously; contact information for the Grievance Official; a reasonable timeframe for completing the review of the grievance, the right to obtain a written decision regarding the grievance; and contact information for independent entities with whom grievances may be filed. Further review of facility policy revealed The Grievance Official will meet with the resident and inform the resident of the results of the investigation and how the resident's grievance was resolved or will be resolved, if applicable. Interview held with Resident R108 on November…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to update care plans to meet care needs for three of 32 residents reviewed (R90, R127, R135) Findings Include: Review of the care plan policy titled Plan of Care Review undated reads, It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that meets psychological, physical and emotional needs and concerns of residents. Safety is a primary concern for our residents, staff and visitors. The purpose of the policy is to provide guidance to the facility to support the inclusion of the resident or resident representatives in all aspects of person-centered care planning and that this planning includes the provision or services to enable the resident to live with dignity and support the resident's goals, choices, and preferences including, but not limited to, goals related to their daily routines and goals to potentially return to a community setting. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical record, review of facilty policy and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and services for two of two residents reviewed (Residents R65 and Resident R28). Findings include: Review of an undated facility policy Oxygen Medical Gas Use, revealed that Oxygen will be ordered by a physician or other authorized provider. Will have a physician/provider's order for the oxygen including route of administration, liters per minutes and the frequency of use. Pure oxygen is irritating to mucus membranes, humidification may be requited for comfort. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems). A review of Resident R65's clinical record revealed a physician order, dated October 29, 2023 for Oxygen at 3 liters / min via Nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to the care of residents with tracheostomy (a surgical airway management procedure which consists of making an incision on the anterior aspect of the neck and opening a direct airway through an incision in the trachea) and PICC and Midline line ( a tube placed in a large vein in the neck, chest, groin, or arm to give fluids, blood, or medications or to do medical tests quickly) dressing changes for 20 of 20 staff reviewed (Employee 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 and 50) Findings include: A review of the facility documentation revealed that the facility had four residents with Midline and PICC line catheters who received care and services from staff including site assessment, medication administration and dressing changes. A review of facility documentation revealed that the facility provided care of a resident with tracheostomy from April…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and interview with staff and resident, it was determined that facility failed to utilize and implement non-pharmacological approaches to care in accordance with the resident's abilities, customary daily routine, interests, preferences, and choices on one of 32 residents reviewed. (Resident R7) Findings include: Review of facility's policy 'Behavior Management General,' indicates that problematic behaviors include yelling/screaming and interdisciplinary team is to complete care plan and involve social services and activities departments as appropriate, review pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, and include resident specific interventions. Review of Residents R7's clinical records revealed diagnosis of cognitive communication deficit, aphasia, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, bipolar and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident R7's care plan revealed that resident had a behavior problem related to refusals with taking medications at times including insulin, taking showers, obtaining blood work and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, interviews with residents and staff, and review of resident documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to routinely offer evening snacks to residents. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Snacks with a revision date of September 2017 states, Snacks and beverages will be provided as identified in the individual plans of care. Bedtime (a.k.a HS) snacks will be provided for all residents. Additional snacks and beverages will be available upon request for all residents who want to eat at non-traditional times. Further review of the policy states, 3. Snacks will be assembled, labeled, and dated in accordance with the individual plan of care for each resident and those items will be delivered to patient care areas in a timely manner. Interview with Resident R21 on December 4, 2023 at 10:34 a.m. revealed the resident was diabetic and had not been receiving a snack in the evening. The resident stated that she will save items from breakfast like cereal or yogurt to have for a snack in the evening. Observation of Resident R21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, interviews with staff, and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that neurological checks were documented one of 32 residents reviewed. (Resident R144). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Neurological Checks (Neuro-checks) revised June 21, 2018 states, It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that meets the psychological, physical and emotional needs and concerns of the residents. Safety is a primary concern for residents, staff and visitors. The purpose of this policy is to guide the nurse in performing neurological checks, usually performed after a head injury or suspicion of a head injury from falls or blows to the head, but may be performed for other reasons in which there is a concern for vascular events included but not limited to cardiovascular accident (CVA or stroke), seizure activity, and brain infections. Further review of the facility policy revealed under Documentation: Complete the Post Fall Assessment, If the resident hit their head or the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policies and procedures, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician ordered hospice care was provided for one of 32 residents reviewed. (R105). Findings include: Review of the Hospice Policy of the Facility, Policy #: NS-1178-01, revealed; End of life care or hospice care is a valuable resource to families and residents and will be provided while the resident is in the facility at the request of the resident, responsible party/family, and physician. The facility is responsible for working with hospice care services to provide the optimum benefits for end-of-life care including pain relief, custodial care, and resident preferences to the extent possible. Communication between the facility staff and the hospice care staff is an integral part of this partnership. Review of the clinical record for Resident R105 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Colostomy Status, (A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, review of clinical records and interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medical consultations with specialists were scheduled for one of nine residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of policy titled Provisions of Physician Ordered Services stated that the attending physician shall authenticate orders for the care and treatment of assigned residents, including orders from consulting prescribers. Continued review of this policy stated qualified nursing personal will summit timely requests for physician ordered services (laboratory, radiology, consultations) to the appropriate entity. Review of Facilities Transport Policy stated the facility must provide the resident centered care that meets the psychosocial, physical, and emotional needs and concerns of the residents. The facility will assist the resident in making transportation arrangements to and from the source of any needed service, such as a dental visit, or physician visits in the event of the resident requires such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility policies, review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer to the hospital and the reasons for the transfer in a timely manner, in writing and in a language and manner they understood after a selected resident was transferred to the hospital for one of two residents reviewed. (Resident R3) Findings Include: Review of MDS (Minimum Data Set-Assessment of resident care needs) for Resident R2 dated May 16, 2023, revealed that the resident had a BIMS score of 3 which indicated that the cognitive status was severely impaired. Review of nursing note for Resident R3 dated May 22, 2023, revealed that the resident was observed with increased lethargy, abnormal labs, and hyperglycemia (increased blood sugar). Physician and family notified, and resident was sent to the hospital for evaluation. Further review of nursing note dated May 22, 2023, revealed that the resident was admitted to the hospital. Review of clinical record revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop, re-evaluate and implement an individualized discharge plan for two of four residents reviewed (Resident R1 and R2). Findings Include: Review of facility care plan Discharge Planning dated July 7, 2020, revealed, A process that generally begins on admission and involves identifying each resident's discharge goals and needs, developing and implementing interventions to address them, and continuously evaluating them throughout the resident's stay to ensure a successful discharge. Procedure: 1) The discharge planning process must be consistent with the discharge rights set forth at 483.15(b) as applicable and 2) Ensure that the discharge needs of each resident are identified and result in the development of a discharge plan for each resident. Work with the clinical team to assure all needs have been identified 3) Include regular re-evaluation of residents to identify changes that require modification of the discharge plan. The discharge plan must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, review of employee job descriptions, employee credentials and current staffing of the facility's food and nutrition services department, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the appropriate services of a full-time qualified dietician. Findings include: Review of job description for Clinical Dietician II revealed that Job Duties and Responsibilities 1. Completes quarterly and annual nutrition assessments on all residents by following the Nutrition care Process guidelines. Documents pertinent interventions regarding malnutrition, significant weight changes, and skin abnormalities according to facility policies. 2. Develop and implement nutrition interventions for all new admission and residents at high nutritional risk by documenting medical and nutrition-related data, providing individualized education, and monitoring daily intakes that contribute to the overall progress in relation to the plan of care and that comply with national standards. 3. Effectively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident was served food that accommodates resident's preferences for one of 5 residents reviewed (Resident R2). Findings include: Interview with Resident R2 on August 9, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. stated he did not always receive foods that he orders, and kitchen always sent wrong food for him. Resident R2 stated was ordered double portion and he did not always receive it. Review of Resident R2's physician orders dated August 1, 2023, revealed that the resident was ordered double potion regular diet for nutrition. Observation of Resident R2's lunch tray on August 9, 2023, at 12:30 p.m. revealed that the resident was eating in his room. It was revealed that the resident was not provided a double portion size lunch. An interview with the Licenses Nurse, Employee E5, on August 9, 2023, at 12:30 p.m. confirmed that Resident R2 did not receive double portion as ordered. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.10(c) Resident care policies

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of the consulting pest control reports, review of facility documentations, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program in the resident care areas for one of three nursing units reviewed. (1st Floor) Findings include: Review of pest control operators report dated August 2, 2023, revealed that there was activity in fly lights and technicians noted kitchen exit door propped open which can alleviate rodent entry into the building. All door not in use should remain closed to prevent entry. Interview with Resident R3 on August 9, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. stated there was flies in her room. She stated she had this problem for a while without any improvement. At the time of the interview, it was observed that there was a fly flying in her room. Review of grievance form filed by Resident R3's family dated November 15, 2022, revealed that the resident was admitted to a Third-floor room with flies, roaches and mice. An observation of Resident R4 on August 9, 2023, at 10:00 a.m with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the physical environment, reviews of the pest control operator's reports, and interviews with residents, staff, and family member, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure that the facility was free of pests for two nursing units (First floor and Second floor) Findings include: Observation conducted on January 23, 2023, at 9:58 a.m. of the First floor nursing unit revealed crawling roach in the men's room. On January 23, 2023, at 12:07 p.m. gnats were observed in the conference room on the First floor unit. Review of Resident Council Minutes Noted for the months of November 2022- January 2023 revealed that residents did report concerns with mice being in the building. An interview with Resident R8 on January 24, 2023, at 9:37 a.m. reported that he observed a mouse in his room a couple of days ago. An interview with a family member of Resident R172 on January 23, 2023, at 1:37 p.m. revealed that a month ago this family member observed mouse droppings in a drawer that had no food items stored.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed related to an indwelling urinary catheter and that a care plan was implemented related to nutrition for two of the 34 residents reviewed (Residents R267 and Resident R7). Findings include: Based on the policy titled Care Plan Overview states the purpose of the policy is to provide guidance to the facility to support the inclusion of the resident or resident representative in all aspects of person-center care planning and that this planning includes the provision of services to enable the resident to live with dignity and support the resident's goals, choices and preferences. A review of Resident 267's clinical record revealed diagnoses of acute renal failure (sudden inability of the kidney to filter waste from the blood). Review of Resident 267's nursing documentation dated, January 15, 2023, revealed that Resident R267 became…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, reviews of resident clinical records, facility policies and procedures, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders related to an indwelling urinary cather for one of 34 residents reviewed. (Resident R27) Findings include: Review of the clinical records of Resident R27 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Dementia (group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory and judgment), and Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder (a person lacks bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or nerve problems). On January 25, 2023, at 1:56 p.m. Resident R27 was observed with a suprapubic urinary catheter with 18 FR (French) size, and 30 cc balloon. (A Suprapubic Catheter is a surgically created connection between the urinary bladder and the skin used to drain urine from the bladder in individuals with obstruction of normal urinary flow;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to to administered intravenous therapy in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of one resident receiving intravenous therapy. (Resident R216) Findings include: Review of the clinical records of Resident R216 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Endocarditis (an infection of the heart's inner lining, usually involving the heart valves, usually occurs when germs from elsewhere in the body travel through the blood and attach to damaged areas of the heart), Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Infection-MSSA ( an infection caused by a type of bacteria commonly found on the surface of the skin, such as the inside of the nose, transmitted through skin-to-skin contact, most often from touching something that contains the bacteria and then spreading it to the hands), and Sepsis (chemicals released in the bloodstream to fight an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to to follow physican orders related to the tracheostomy care for one of one resident review with a tracheostomy. (Resident R30) Findings include: Review of Resident R30's clinical records revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-COPD (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (occurs when the body is unable to remove enough carbon dioxide from the blood), and Malignant Neoplasm of Larynx (Cancer of the Larynx, or Voice Box). Review of physician order, dated November 30, 2022, for Resident R27, indicated for Trach Change to downsize to Shiley 4 CFS, as needed (Trach is a short-form-word to indicate Tracheostomy; Tracheostomy is a hole that surgeons make through the front of the neck into the windpipe (trachea); a tracheostomy tube is placed into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the Food and Nutrition Services, reviews of policies and procedures, food committee meeting minutes, and interviews with residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received foods and beverages that were at appetizing temperatures. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding meal temperatures, dated September 2017, Healthcare Service Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries Food: Preparation revealed that The Dining Service Director/ Cook(s) will be responsible for food preparation techniques which minimize the amount of time that food items are exposed to temperatures greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit and or less than 135 degrees Fahrenheit or per state regulation. On January 25, 2023, at 12:54 p.m. a test tray was conducted in the presence of the Food Director, Employee E9, which revealed that the temperatures of the hot foods tested were below the facility's established policy of 135 degrees Fahrenheit and the temperature of the cold foods tested were above 41 degrees Fahrenheit at the point of service for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$428,987 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $10,628 — penalty dated 2025-07-18
  • $105,996 — penalty dated 2024-10-30
  • $312,363 — penalty dated 2024-07-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-22.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.0M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 90%Medicare 3%Other / private 7%

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$372per resident / day
operating cost
$11,317per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$303per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395258. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next