No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Dr Arthur Clifton McKinley Ctr

133 Laurelbrooke Drive, Brookville, PA 15825 · Non profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (814) 849-3615 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 849-3615 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Jan 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (20% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • about 29% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
88 Hospital Rd · (814) 849-1874 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
West Main Street · (814) 849-5217 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
40 White St · (814) 849-2356 · Call to confirm hours
Park
236 Main St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
73 White St Ste 3 · (814) 229-6113

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.5%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.7%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened37.2%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.1%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.6%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.7%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.1%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission9.9%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.7%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.561.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.011.181.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 119 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
76.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.47U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 76.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.4%CMS range 41.7–58.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.4–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge76.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge74.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.7%CMS range 2.9–9.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
1.29
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.88
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.68
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
19.7%
Total nursing turnover
0.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 86.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-04)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate a baseline care plan and provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for five of five residents reviewed (Residents R2, R6, R9, R10, and R13). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Care Plans - Baseline dated 11/4/25, revealed that A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight hours of admission. The policy further stated The baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality of care and must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident including, but not limited to the following: Initial goals based on admission orders and discussion with the resident/representative, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, social services, and PASARR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and manufacturer's guidelines, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately discard outdated medications for one of two medication rooms reviewed (Rehabilitation Unit). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Medication Labeling and Storage dated 11/4/25, revealed that Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (example - needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28-days unless the manufacturer specified a shorter or longer date for the open vial. Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that an open vial of Tubersol (a solution used for tuberculosis testing upon admission and employment) should be discarded within 30-days after opening. Observation of drug storage on 12/2/25, at 12:13 p.m. of the Rehabilitation Unit medication storage room refrigerator revealed an open vial of Tubersol with an open date of 10/28/25, making the discard date 11/27/25. During an interview at the time of observation, Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E1 confirmed that the open vial of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was completed to indicate the code status as Full Code (CPR[cardiopulmonary resuscitation]/Attempt Resuscitation) or Do Not Resuscitate (DNR/Do Not Attempt Resuscitation-Allow Natural Death) for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R26). Findings include: No facility policy was provided regarding a physician's order in the electronic medical record (EMR) for a resident. Resident R26's clinical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs are unable to provide oxygen to the body), cardiac heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), diabetes mellitus type one (a condition where the pancreas makes little or no insulin to carry the blood sugar into the cells of the body resulting in high blood sugars), and constipation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence that non-pharmacological interventions (interventions attempted to calm a resident other than medication) were attempted prior to the administration of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic (affecting the mind) medication for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident R24). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Behavioral Assessment, Intervention, and Monitoring dated 11/02/24, indicated that non-pharmacological approaches will be used to the extent possible to avoid or reduce the use of antipsychotic medications to manage behavioral symptoms and that other approaches and interventions will be tried prior to the use of antipsychotics medications. Resident R24's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/07/22, with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a condition that prevents airflow to the lungs resulting in difficulty breathing), Anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and manufacturer's instructions, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were discarded in a timely manner for one of two medication rooms observed (1st floor medication room) Findings include: A facility policy entitled Medication Labeling and Storage dated 11/02/24, indicated that multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (example - needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28-days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. Manufacturer's recommendations for Tubersol PPD (solution used to test for tuberculosis) indicated that vials which are entered and in use for 30-days should be discarded. Observation of drug storage on 12/18/24, at approximately 10:01 a.m. in 1st floor medication storage room refrigerator revealed an opened vial of Tubersol PPD with and an open date of 11/15/2024, making the discard date 12/15/24. During an interview at the time of observation, Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E1 confirmed that the open Tubersol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident was offered the opportunity to participate in the development, review, and/or revision of their person-centered care plan for three of 18 residents reviewed (Residents R7, R12, and R26). Findings include: Resident R7's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/11/22, with diagnoses that included Diabetes (a condition where the body produces insufficient amounts of insulin, causing high blood sugar), peripheral vascular disease (a slow and progressive circulation disorder), and atrial fibrillation (a type of abnormal, rapid heartbeat that is present all the time, causing shortness of breath, heart palpitations, and weakness and can lead to development of blood clots). Review of Resident R7's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care needs), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD-a look back period of time for the MDS assessment) of 11/27/23, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a written summary of the baseline care plan was provided to the resident and/or the resident's representative for four of 18 residents reviewed (Residents R30, R25, R34, and R65). Findings include: Resident R30's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/16/23, with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-a condition that obstructs air flow in the lungs with symptoms of difficulty breathing, coughing and shortness of breath), congestive heart failure (a progressive heart disease that weakens the pumping action of the heart muscles, causing fatigue and shortness of breath in the resident), Diabetes (a condition where the body produces insufficient amounts of insulin, causing high blood sugar). Review of Resident R30's clinical record lacked evidence that a written summary of the baseline care plan was provided to the resident and/or representative. Resident R25's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/14/23, with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete investigation for an injury of unknown origin in a timely manner for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R57). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Resident Incident and Accident Report dated 1/27/23, indicated that, The RN (Registered Nurse) will initiate an investigation for any injury or accident of unknown cause. Review of the clinical record revealed that on 12/12/23, at 10:12 a.m. Resident R57 was having increased leg pain and the physician was notified to obtain an x-ray, an order was received from the physician at 10:38 a.m. to x-ray Resident R57's left hip and leg, the x-ray company was called at 10:52 a.m. and the x-ray was completed at 6:14 p.m. On 12/14/23, at 1:02 a.m. the x-ray results were obtained via telephone which identified an acute left femoral neck fracture and at 9:19 a.m. an order was received to send Resident R57 to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a wound care plan for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R34). Findings include: Resident R34's clinical record revealed an admission date of 8/2/23, with diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure), peripheral venous insufficiency (a condition where your veins have trouble sending blood from your limbs back to your heart), open wound right lower leg, and lymphedema (a condition that causes swelling which can cause skin break down). Review of Resident R34's treatment record revealed an order to keep dressings clean, dry and intact to both legs, and to elevate bilateral lower extremities when possible. Review of Resident R34's physician orders revealed Resident R34 follows with the wound clinic for peripheral venous wounds to bilateral legs. Review of Resident R34's care plans revealed no evidence of a care plan for peripheral venous wounds to bilateral legs. During an interview on 1/11/24, at 12:21 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident 34's plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for medication administration and oxygen therapy for two of 18 residents reviewed (Residents R65 and R30). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Physician Orders dated 1/27/23, revealed Upon receipt of written or verbal orders by the practitioner, the Registered Nurse (RN) will write and or enter the new order into electronic medical record (EMR). and If a new medication has been ordered . the pharmacy should dispense either via omni cell, routine/scheduled run or via emergency run. Review of Resident R65's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/14/23, with diagnosis that include urinary tract infection (an infection in the urine), diabetes (a condition where the body produces insufficient amounts of insulin, causing high blood sugar), hypertension (high blood pressure), and urinary calculus (kidney stones). Interview with Resident R65 on 1/10/24, at 10:42 a.m. revealed that he/she was told…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the provision of Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP - a machine that uses pressure to push air into your lungs) and/or CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) therapy for one of one residents reviewed for respiratory services (Resident R30). Findings include: Review of a facility policy dated 1/27/23, entitled, AVAPS (Average Volume Assured Pressure Support - a device that provide consistent ventilation support) and BiPAP Therapy indicated Procedure instructions stating, Obtain physician order .). Resident R30's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/16/23, with diagnoses including respiratory failure with hypercapnia (extreme breathing difficulties demonstrated by increased carbon dioxide levels in the blood), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and diabetes (a condition where the body produces…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility contract, clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain records relating to dialysis communication and collaboration for one of one residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident R39). Findings include: Review of dialysis contract dated 11/28/23, indicated Long Term Care Facility (LTCF) shall timely provide all relevant information to Dialysis Clinic Inc (DCI) regarding the condition and needs of each LTCF patient ., DCI shall provide relevant information regarding each patient's dialysis treatment which may require follow up care or observation by LTCF's staff: and This .communication will occur prior to each and every transfer of a patient to DCI . Resident R39's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/28/23, with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (a disease that causes the kidneys not to function properly), diabetes, hypercholesterolemia (high cholesterol), and hypothyroidism (a condition where your thyroid gland [a butterfly shaped organ in your neck] makes too little hormone). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately discard outdated medications for two of three medication carts reviewed (Apple Tree and Hickory Lane medication carts). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Storage of Medications dated 1/27/23, indicated The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed open Insulin Lispro pens must be used within 28 days after opening or be discarded, even if the pen still contains insulin. Observation of drug storage on 1/9/24, at 3:46 p.m. of the Hickory Lane medication cart revealed a pen of Insulin Lispro with an open date of 12/10/23, which was beyond the expiration date of 28 days after opening. During an interview at the time of observation, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1 confirmed that the Insulin Lispro pen should have been discarded as it was beyond the 28 days after opening. Observation of drug storage on 1/9/24, at 4:18 p.m. of the Apple Tree…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WRC SENIOR SERVICESOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/04/2007
DUBOIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTEROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2024
PENN HIGHLANDS HEALTHCARE, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2024
BELCZYK, CARLYNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
CHAMBERLAIN, WILLIAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
CONRAD, DONALDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
DEVLIN, JAMESIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
FORADORA, SCOTTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2020
JOHNSTON, OSCARIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
LEWIS, SAMUELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
LEZZER, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
MCGINLEY, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
O'LEARY, ROBERTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
PFINGSTLER, RICHARDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
RYAN, JAMESIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2020
RYAN, JOANNEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
SUTIKA, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
YAHNER, EDWARDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
YOUNG, WILLIAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
KLINE, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
BAUER, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
FONTAINE, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
JOHNSON, TRINAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
NORMAN, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
WINNER, DOUGLASIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
NEFSTEAD, ANTHONYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 75 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.6M
Related-party expense29% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 41%Medicare 8%Other / private 51%

This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$276per resident / day
operating cost
$8,389per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$272per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395550. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next