No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pine View Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

50 North Malin Road, Broomall, PA 19008 · For profit - Corporation · 298 certified beds · (610) 356-0800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (610) 356-0800 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited Aug 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Aug 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2633 W Chester Pike · (610) 353-2220 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2530 W Chester Pike · (610) 356-6491 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2910 W Chester Pike · (610) 356-1308 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Licia Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.4%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.3%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.6%10.8%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.7%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.6%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.4%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.6%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.4%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine32.8%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.1%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.9%9.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.011.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.841.181.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 135 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.6%CMS range 29.4–46.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 8.5–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge57.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified87.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.8–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
1.22
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.41
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.92
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
49.5%
Total nursing turnover
42.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 298 beds and averages 209.8 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 88 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-26)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-28)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately and comprehensively assess and timely provide a wound treatment for two of three residents, reviewed (Resident 1 and 2).Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown-Clinical Protocol, revised in April 2018, revealed that the nursing staff will assess and document an individual's significant risk factor for developing pressure ulcers. The nurse shall describe and document /report a full assessment of the pressure ulcer, including location, stage, length, width, and depth. A review of Resident 1's readmission skin assessment dated [DATE], revealed an identified skin impairment to the right buttock. The assessment failed to reveal a description of the area/wound and size. A review of the physician's progress notes dated February 10, 2026, at 2:56 p.m., reveals Pt (patient) has new small wound on buttock. Wound care follow-up. Wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical records review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure infection control and prevention were implemented during a wound care treatment for two of the two residents reviewed (Resident 1 and 2).Findings: A review of Resident 1's physician's order dated March 8, 2026, revealed an order to cleanse the right buttocks with normal saline solution (NSS), pat dry, apply Medihoney (A dressing that aids and supports debridement and a moist wound healing environment in acute and chronic wounds and burns), and secure with silicone border twice daily for the wound. An observation of Resident 1's right buttock wound care treatment was conducted on March 9, 2026, at 10:40 a.m., with licensed nurse Employee 3. The observation revealed Employee E3 placed tissue paper on the bed beside the resident and laid the wet gauze, Medihoney in a cup and bordered dressing on top of it. Employee E3 proceeded to clean the right buttock wound with a wet gauze, then discarded it in a trash can. Employee E3 continued to apply Medihoney into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and shower schedules, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers as scheduled for two of 65 residents reviewed (Residents 13 and 144).Findings include:A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 13, dated May 23, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with care needs including bathing and toileting hygiene, had an indwelling catheter and was incontinent frequently of bowel. A care plan for Resident 13, dated April 21, 2025, indicated that the resident had a history of refusal of medications, showers and treatments.Physician's orders for Resident 13, dated June 9, 2025, revealed that the resident was scheduled to receive a shower on Wednesdays and Saturdays on the 3-11 shift.A review of the nurse aide bathing report and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident 13 from April 2025, through August 24, 2025, revealed that there was no documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders regarding medication administration were followed for two of 65 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 30), and failed to address physician recommendations from an outside appointment for one of 65 residents reviewed (Resident 25).Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated May 25, 2025, indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, had no speech, could rarely understand, and was rarely understood, required assistance from staff for care needs, had diagnoses that included Type II diabetes (body does not use insulin effectively or does not produce enough insulin to control blood sugar levels), and was administered insulin (medication to lower blood sugar). A care plan dated April 23, 2025, for Resident 6 indicated that he was an insulin dependent diabetic, staff were to assess and record blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible by failing to complete an air mattress safety assessment to identify potential safety hazards for 11 of 65 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 5, 7, 10, 13, 14, 19, 111, and 143) and failed to ensure that each resident received assistance devices to prevent accidents during transport in a wheelchair for one of 65 residents reviewed (Resident 172).Findings Include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated May 16, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for his daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included prostate (gland located below the bladder in men) cancer. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated August 25, 2023, included an order for the resident's bed to be equipped with a low air loss mattress.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for two of 65 residents reviewed (Resident 5 and 30). Findings include: A facility policy regarding medication administration, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that after administering the medication, document administration on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the controlled substance sign out record, if necessary. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated July 15, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with care needs, had pain and was taking an opioid medication (medications with the potential to be abused used to treat pain). Physician's orders for Resident 5, dated May 22, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 5 milligrams (mg) of Oxycodone HCL (a narcotic pain medication) every four hours as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, clinical records and investigative reports, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from any physical restraints not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for two of 65 residents reviewed (Residents 111, 172). Findings include:The facility's policy on restraints, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that each resident would be free of restraints.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 111, dated June 4, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. The resident's care plan, dated June 2, 2022, revealed that the resident was at risk for falls and should be placed in a highly populated area to be monitored and not left alone in his room. A quarterly MDS for Resident 172, dated June 12, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Minimum Data Set (MDS) validation report, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Care Area Assessment Process of comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments and comprehensive assessments were completed in the required time frame for 9 of 65 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3, 32, 35, 87, 99, 119, 122, 200). Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that for admission MDS assessments, the assessment completion date, and the Care Area Assessment (CAA - the process of completing an in-depth assessment of triggered, potentially problematic care areas) completion date (Item V0200B2) were to be no later than the resident's admission date plus 13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required time frame for 2 of 65 residents reviewed (Residents 25, 174). Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that the assessment reference date (ARD - the last day of the assessment's look-back period) of a quarterly MDS assessment must be no more than 92 days after the ARD of the most recent assessment of any type, and the assessment was to have a completion date (Section Z0500B) that was no later than the ARD plus 14 calendar days. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 25 had an ARD of August 2, 2025, but it was not completed (Section Z0500B) until August 19, 2025.A quarterly MDS assessment for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that encoding/transmitting Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required time frame for 5 of 65 residents reviewed (Residents 15, 77, 147, 199, 200). Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that for entry and death in facility tracking records, the MDS Completion Date (Z0500B) must be no later than 7 days from the event date (A1600 for an entry record; A2000 for a Death in Facility tracking record)A discharge MDS assessment for Resident 15 had an ARD of May 4, 2025, but it was not completed (Section Z0500B) until May 19, 2025.An entry MDS assessment for Resident 77 had an ARD of June 1, 2025, but it was not completed (Section Z0500B) until June 25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for four of 65 residents reviewed (Residents 9, 10, 34, and 111).Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, revealed that Section N0450D (antipsychotic medication review) was to be checked (1) yes, if a physician documented a GDR (gradual dose reduction-process involves slowly tapering a patient's medication to see if their symptoms can be managed with a lower dose or if the drug can be discontinued entirely) as clinically contraindicated. Physician's orders for Resident 9 dated May 21, 2025, included for the Resident to receive 0.5 milligrams (mg) of Risperdal (an antipsychotic medication) two times a day. Review of psychiatric consults for Resident 9 dated June 11, 2025, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan for one of 65 residents reviewed (Resident 13). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Care plan interventions are chosen based on relevant clinical data and decision making. Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan when there has been a significant change in condition, when the desired outcome has not been met, when the resident has been readmitted from the hospital and at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment.A quarterly Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for two of 65 residents reviewed (Residents 5 and 13).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated March 12, 2025, indicated that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Care plan interventions are chosen based on relevant clinical data and decision making. Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan when there has been a significant change in condition, when the desired outcome has not been met, when the resident has been readmitted from the hospital and at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that interventions were in place to prevent urinary tract infections for one of 65 residents reviewed (Resident 13) who had an indwelling urinary catheter.Findings include:The facility's policy regarding indwelling urinary catheters (a flexible tube inserted and held in the bladder to drain urine), dated March 12, 2025, revealed that catheter drainage bags were to be kept off the floor.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 14, dated July 9, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, incontinent of bladder, and had urinary tract infections.Physician's orders for Resident 11, dated August 19, 2025, included an order for the resident to have an indwelling urinary catheter due to a pressure ulcer.Observations of Resident 14 on August 26, 2025, at 2:27 p.m. revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of manufacturer's instructions and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication administration error rate of less than five percent. Findings include:Observations during medication administration on August 24, 2025, revealed that two medication administration errors were made during 25 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication administration error rate of 8.00 percent.Current manufacturer's directions for use of Advair (Fluticasone-Salmeterol) Inhalation Aerosol Powder (used to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and Asthma) revealed that serious side effects including thrush (a fungal infection in the mouth and throat) can occur. Rinse the mouth with water without swallowing after use to reduce the chance of getting thrush.Physician's orders for Resident 66, dated January 24, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 100-50 micrograms of Fluticasone-Salmeterol Inhalation Aerosol Powder with instructions to inhale 1 puff orally twice daily for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of manufacturer's instructions, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to date an opened multidose vial of Aplisol tuberculin (TB) solution (used to test for tuberculosis infection) in one of two medication storage area refrigerators reviewed (1 Main) and failed to provide a separately-locked, permanently-affixed compartment in the refrigerator for the storage of controlled drugs (medications that have the potential to be abused) in two of two medication storage area refrigerators reviewed (1 main and 2 West).Findings include: Manufacturer's instructions for Aplisol TB solution, dated November 2013, indicated that vials in use more than 30 days should be discarded due to possible oxidation and degradation which may affect potency. Observations of the facility's medication storage area refrigerator on 1 Main, on August 26, 2025, at 11:01 a.m. revealed an opened and undated vial of Aplisol TB solution. The narcotic box in the refrigerator was fixed to the shelf and did not contain any narcotic medications; however, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based upon review of personnel records, it was determined the facility failed to obtain an FBI clearance for one of one employee reviewed (Employee E6). Findings include: Review of Employee E6's personnel file revealed Employee E6 was hired on April 24, 2024 and indicated they had not resided within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania during the previous two years. Further review of Employee E6's personnel file failed to reveal evidence of an FBI background clearance. Interview with Employee E3 on August 28, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. revealed that the facility failed to obtain an FBI background clearance for Employee E6. The above information was conveyed to the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on August 28, 2024, at 11:15 a.m. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(2) Management Previously cited 9/26/2023, 1/17/2024

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively investigate an unknown injury for one of the three residents reviewed (Resident 146). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Program revised in 2016, revealed, the administrator will ensure that all injuries are investigated. Injury of unknown source is defined as an injury that meets the following: The injury was not observed by any person, or the source of the injury could not be explained by the resident. The Director of Nursing (DON) or a designee will assess all injuries and document clinical findings in the clinical record. The investigator will compile a list of all personnel, including consultants, contract employees, visitors, family members, etc., who had contact with residents during the past 48 hours. Review of Resident 146's diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (irreversible, progressive degenerative disease of the brain, resulting in loss of reality contact and functioning ability), Psychosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to timely obtain a urine specimen for testing according to physician orders for one of 32 residents reviewed. (Resident 58) Findings include: Review of Resident 58's clinical record revealed a progress note dated July 30, 2024, at 2:01 p.m. which indicated During afternoon rounds, resident appeared lethargic; resident will answer to name being called but more confused than (his/her) regular baseline. Resident will occasionally jerk but is unaware of jerking when asked. Call placed to MD (Medical Doctor), spoke to NP (Nurse Practitioner); NP stated MD will be notified. Awaiting call back. Further review of Resident 58's progress notes revealed on July 31, 2024, at 2:47 p.m. Still awaiting call from MD about resident confusion and not being (his/her) regular baseline. Resident occasionally jerk and appears to be more confused than normal. Review of Resident 58's August 2024 physician orders revealed an order dated August 2, 2024, UA/CS ASAP [urinalysis/culture and sensitivity as soon as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, observations and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent the development and/or worsening of pressure ulcer and promote healing for one of 31 residents sampled (Resident 103). Findings include: Review of Resident 103's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility was on August 20, 2021, with diagnoses that included Muscle Weakness (decrease in muscle strength), Dysphagia following cerebral infraction (difficulty swallowing after stroke), Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following cerebral infraction affecting right dominant side (paralysis of the entire right side of the body), Gastrostomy status (tube feed), bedridden (confined to bed), and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (long-term condition where the body doesn't properly regulate and use sugar). Review of Resident 103's clinical record revealed a progress note dated April 29, 2024, at 4:42 a.m. Resident have some redness around stoma (site where peg tube enters the body), G/T (Gastrostomy tube) is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to obtain and monitor weights for one of 12 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 83). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Weight and Weight Change Management, revised 2024, revealed each patient will be weighed monthly or more frequently as deemed necessary by Physician's order, Dietitian, or IDT [interdisciplinary team]. Residents with a suspected weight change (per MDS [Minimum Data Set - periodic assessment of resident needs] guidelines) will have a re-weight completed in a timely manner. All confirmed re-weights will be documented in the electronic medical record. Review of Resident 83's clinical record revealed a weight of 164.4 pounds on July 3, 2024. Resident's weight was recorded as 150.0 pounds on August 1, 2024, a loss of 14.4 pounds or 8.8%. Further review of the clinical record revealed a weight change note on August 16, 2024, (15 days after the weight was obtained) indicated the resident triggered for a significant weight loss over 30 days and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on hospital records review, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate diagnosis for Antipsychotic medication and failed to attempt nonpharmacological intervention and appropriate indication for administration of as-needed anti-anxiety medication for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 73). Findings include: Review of Resident 73's physician orders dated June 18, 2024, revealed an order for Lorazepam (Anti-anxiety medication) 0.5 mg one tablet every 12 hours as needed for agitation. Review of Resident 73's June 2024, Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed from June 18, 2024, until June 24, 2024, the resident was administered as-needed Lorazepam five times. Review of Resident 73's clinical records revealed that aside from agitation there were no appropriate indications as to why Lorazepam was administered to the resident. Additional review failed to reveal that non-pharmacological interventions were attempted before administering Lorazepam to Resident 73. Interview conducted with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records review, and interviews with resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an order for NPO (nothing per mouth) before a procedure was followed for one of the two residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), awaiting hip surgery, and Intellectual disability. Review of Resident R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- A standardized assessment tool that measures health status in long-term care residents) dated January 3, 2024, revealed resident's cognition was intact. Review of the nursing progress notes dated February 22, 2024, at 2:39 p.m., revealed resident returned from a Cardiologist (A physician who specializes in heart conditions) appointment. The note revealed that the resident was scheduled for a Transesophageal Echocardiogram (TEE- An ultrasound that provides highly detailed images of the heart and its internal structure) on February 28, 2024, at [Hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment that was safe and sanitary in three of 11 rooms observed on the 3rd Floor Unit (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) Findings include: Observation on the 3rd-floor unit room [ROOM NUMBER] conducted on January 17, 2023, at 10:30 a.m., revealed the following: Scattered dried light brown substance drips on the wall behind the resident's bed; multiple dried brown substance on the floor by the resident's bed, and dried brown substance on the wall near the bathroom door. In addition, the wall behind the resident's bed was observed with an uncovered electrical socket. Observation on the 3rd-floor unit room [ROOM NUMBER] conducted on January 17, 2024, at 10:35 a.m., revealed a dried light brown sticky and a dried dark brown sticky substance by the side of bed A floor, both approximately 1 foot in size. In addition, a light brown dried sticky substance approximately two feet in size was observed on the floor on the foot side of bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-26 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive admission and annual Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required timeframe for 12 of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 50, 54, 62, 72, 89, 90, 91, 107, 112, 127, 144, 145). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, indicated that an admission MDS assessment was to be completed no later than 14 days following admission. An admission MDS assessment for Resident 107 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and the resident's admission MDS assessment was dated as completed on May 24, 2018, which was 16 days after admission. An admission MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-26 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required timeframe for 56 of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 9 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, 25, 31, 32, 33, 38, 39, 42, 49, 54, 55, 57, 59, 63, 67, 68, 69, 71, 74, 78, 82, 83, 85, 86, 90, 94, 97, 98, 101, 102, 104, 106, 109, 114, 115, 117, 119, 120, 122, 123, 124, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 134, 136, 137, 138). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of residents' abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, indicated that the completion date for a quarterly assessment is the Assessment Reference Date (ARD - the last day of an assessment's look-back period) plus 14 days. A quarterly assessment is due every 92 days (ARD of most recent assessment + 92 days). A quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs for five of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 22, 48, 51, 115). Findings include: A facility policy for Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, dated April 21, 2023, included that care plans would be resident centered to express the needs of the residents. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated August 9, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with daily care needs, was receiving supplemental oxygen, and had diagnosis that included Alzheimer's disease and congestive heart failure (condition when heart does not pump blood as efficiently as it should). Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated July 6, 2023, included that the resident receive 2 liters per minute (L/min) of oxygen for shortness of breath…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility polices and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that physician's orders were followed for four of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 47, 98, 139). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated April 21, 2023, revealed that medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required timeframe. The following information is checked/verified for each resident prior to administering medications: Vital signs, if necessary. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated August 9, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with daily care needs, and had diagnosis that included Alzheimer's disease and congestive heart failure (condition when heart does not pump blood as efficiently as it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for an indwelling urinary catheter for one of 89 residents reviewed (Resident 39). Findings include: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 39, dated August 21, 2023, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand, required extensive assistance from staff for his daily care tasks, and had an indwelling urinary catheter. Physician's orders for Resident 39, dated November 24, 2022, included an order for staff to monitor the resident's suprapubic foley catheter (a tube inserted through the lower abdominal wall into the bladder to drain urine) every shift. Resident 39's clinical record and Treatment Administration Records (TAR's) for August and September 2023 revealed no documented evidence that the resident's suprapubic foley catheter was monitored during the day shift on August 18, 20, 30, 2023, and September 20, 2023; during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain weekly weights as requested by the dietician for one of 89 residents reviewed (Resident 132). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 132, dated August 30, 2023, revealed that he had clear speech; was usually understood and could understand; required extensive assist of one for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene; was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder; and weighed 155 pounds, indicating a loss of 5 percent or more and was not on a prescribed weight-loss regimen. A nutrition care plan for Resident 132, dated August 24, 2023, indicated that the resident had a history of weight loss and that he would maintain an adequate nutritional status. Interventions included observing for signs of malnutrition, determining individual likes and dislikes, and to weigh…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 89 residents reviewed (Resident 22). Findings include: The facility's medication administration policy, dated April 1, 2023, indicated that the individual administering the medication documented in the electronic MAR (medication administration record). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 22, dated August 25, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance to total dependence from staff for daily care needs, had pain frequently, received pain medication routinely and as-needed, and received an opioid (a controlled pain medication). Physician's orders, dated March 10, 2023, included orders for the resident to receive 50 milligrams (mg) of Tramadol (a narcotic pain medication) every six hours as needed for a pain rating of 6 to 10 (on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve palatable food that was at appropriate temperatures. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food temperatures, dated April 21, 2023, revealed that the service temperature of hot foods to residents would be within the range of 120-140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) based on the resident's preference and cold foods were to be served to the residents at 45 degrees F. Interview with Resident 14 on September 23, 2023, at 2:05 p.m. revealed that the food was terrible and that she rarely gets any food that is edible. Interview with Resident 49 on September 23, 2023, at 2:34 p.m. revealed that the food is terrible and that she has been served moldy bread for her peanut butter sandwiches. She stated that the food often tastes old and stale. Interview with Resident 63 on September 23, 2023, at 1:40 p.m. revealed that the food is terrible and that she often skips the meals and eats a peanut butter sandwich. Interview with Resident 72 on September 23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and manufacturer's instructions, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety by failing to properly label and date refrigerated foods, to secure a door leading to the outside, and to ensure that ice was made and stored in sanitary ice machines for one of two ice machines reviewed (2 [NAME] unit). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food storage, dated April 21, 2023, revealed that leftover food was to be stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely. Each item was to be clearly labeled and dated before being refrigerated. Observations in the reach-in refrigerator on September 23, 2023, at 9:07 a.m. revealed that there was a package of chicken breast and a package of multiple hot dogs that were wrapped in cellophane and were not labeled or dated. Observations on September 23, 2023, at 9:14 a.m. revealed there was a door to the outside that was propped open with a plastic milk crate and no staff were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that facility failed to determine if residents were safe to self-administer medications for one of 89 residents reviewed (Resident 42). Findings include: The facility's medication administration policy, dated April 1, 2023, indicated that residents may self administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, have determined that they may have the decision-making capability to do so safely. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 42, dated September 21, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required limited assistance from staff with eating, and had diagnoses that included dementia. Physician's orders, dated March 8, 2022, included orders for the resident to receive one multi-vitamin daily. The resident's record contained no documented evidence that an evaluation was completed to determine if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, Pennsylvania laws and personnel records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Pennsylvania State Police background checks were completed for one of five employees reviewed (Nurse Aide 2). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding criminal background checks, dated April 21, 2023, revealed that the personnel/human resources director, or other designee, will conduct background checks, reference checks, and criminal conviction checks (including finger printing as may be required by state law) on all potential employees and contract personnel who meet the criteria for direct-access employee, as stated above. Such investigation will be initiated within two days of an offer of employment or contract agreement. Chapter 5, Section 502(a)(1) of Pennsylvania Act 169, dated December 18, 1996, indicated that a criminal history report was to be obtained from the State Police for all applicants. Section 501 defined State Police as The Pennsylvania State Police. Section 506 indicated that the facility could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to the required electronic system, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) System, within 14 days of completion for eight of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 13, 18, 91, 96, 132, 139, 147). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (federally-mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, indicated that comprehensive MDS assessments must be transmitted electronically within 14 days of the Care Plan Completion Date (V0200C2 + 14 days). All other MDS assessments must be submitted within 14 days of the MDS Completion Date (Z0500B + 14 days). Section Z0500B of an entry tracking MDS assessment for Resident 2 revealed that the MDS assessment was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for three of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 78, 98). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides guidance and instructions for the completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, indicated that the intent of Section N was to record the number of days, during the seven days of the assessment period, that any type of injection, insulin, and/or select medications were received by the resident. Section N0410F was to be coded with the number of days the resident received an antibiotic. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated August 9, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in residents' care needs for three of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 51, 78, 79). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated April 21, 2023, indicated that the resident's care plan would be update or revised when the resident's care changed. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 51, dated August 4, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, had an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted and held in the bladder to drain urine), and received an anticoagulant (blood thinning) medication. Resident 51's current care plan indicated that the resident used a diuretic (water pill) related to hypertension. Review of Resident 51's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for September 2023 revealed that the resident was not receiving a diuretic medication. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 79, dated July 20, 2023, indicated that the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of manufacturer's instructions and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication administration error rate of less than five percent. Findings include: Observations during medication administration on September 24, 2023, revealed that four medication administration errors were made during 25 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication administration error rate of 16 percent. Physician's orders for Resident 139, dated August 27, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive one 5 mg tablet of Midodrine (used to treat low blood pressure) two times a day and staff was to hold for a systolic blood pressure (SBP-top number of a blood pressure reading) greater than 130 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Observations during medication administration on September 24, 2023, at 8:55 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 3 placed Resident 139's Midodrine into a medication souffle cup with her other medications. She took the medication souffle cup containing the medications,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of correction for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) surveys ending September 2, 2022, and December 20, 2022, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending September 26, 2023, identified repeated deficiencies related to revising care plans, quality of care, nutrition/hydration status, and infection control. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding revising care plans, cited during the survey ending September 2, 2022, revealed that the facility developed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control practices were followed while administering medications for one of 89 residents reviewed (Resident 139). Findings include: The facility's medication administration policy, dated April 21, 2023, indicated that staff was to follow established facility infection control procedures (e.g., handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc.) for the administration of medications as applicable. Physician's orders for Resident 139, dated September 19, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive one one milligram (mg) tablet of Clonazepam (used to treat panic disorder) every 12 hours for anxiety. Observations during medication administration on September 24, 2023, at 8:55 a.m. revealed that while preparing medications for Resident 139, Licensed Practical Nurse 3 removed the Clonazepam from the medication blister package into her bare hand and then placed the medication into a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident was offered and/or received the pneumococcal immunizations for four of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 19, 117, 125, 137). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding pneumococcal vaccines, dated April 21, 2023, indicated that prior to admission, all residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, will be offered the vaccine within thirty days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 19, dated August 3, 2023, revealed that the resident was usually understood and could usually understand others, required limited assistance with personal hygiene needs, was not up to date on his pneumococcal vaccine, and was not offered a pneumococcal vaccine. Review of the immunization records…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a private-equity firm. That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • LIMESTONE ENTERPRISES LLC — private equity · 67.00% share · 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LIMESTONE ENTERPRISES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST67%since 01/01/2024
MOSKOWITZ, YISROELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST30%since 01/01/2024
GROSSMAN, ARYEHIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2024
GESTETNER, COLEVIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$940K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 6%Other / private 10%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $940K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$388per resident / day
operating cost
$11,782per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$346per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395078. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next