No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bryn Mawr Village

773 East Haverford Road, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010 · Non profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (610) 525-8300 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0609, F0610) — most recent Feb 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$15,902 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,902 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-10)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (73%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
600 Haverford Rd · (610) 306-9162 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
30 N Bryn Mawr Ave · (610) 525-0443 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Acme0.5 mi
601 W Lancaster Ave · (610) 525-1950 · Call to confirm hours
Park
110 County Line Rd · (610) 645-6220 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.0%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.4%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.1%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.6%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.0%25.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.5%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine43.4%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.6%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.0%9.5%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 230 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.30hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.8%CMS range 47.0–59.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 8.7–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge64.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.9%CMS range 5.0–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.69
RN hours/ resident / day
1.36
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.21
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.26
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.50
RN hoursweekends
73.3%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 33.7 residents a day — about 28% occupied, or roughly 86 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.45 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 73% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-13)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policies and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nutritional interventions, failed to complete timely nutritional assessments by a qualified nutrition professional, failed to notify physician of weight loss, failed to ensure residents with vegetarian diet received appropriate diet with nutritional value and failed to complete weight assessment to promote acceptable parameters of nutritional status which resulted in Resident R20 experiencing unplanned significant weight loss four times from November 24, 2023 to April 24, 2024, (lost 33.03% (43 pounds) of body weights) and continued to place Resident R20 at risk for further nutritional decline. This failure placed Resident R20 in Immediate Jeopardy situation, for one of three residents reviewed for nutritional risk. (Resident R20) Findings include: Review of facility policy Weight Assessment and Intervention dated September 2008, revealed that Weight Assessment The nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident R47). This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R47 who spilled a hot liquid on his/her thigh resulting in a burn. This deficiency was identified as past non-compliance.Findings Include: Review of facility policy Assisting the Resident with In-Room Meals revised December 2013 revealed staff should check that hot foods are hot (but not scalding temperature). Review of Resident R47's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated September 20, 2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients in the body), muscle wasting, and muscle weakness.Continued review of Resident R47's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE], revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to discuss the risks/benefits in advance for newly admitted resident for two of five resident records reviewed (Residents R1, and R23).Findings include:A review of the clinical record for Resident R1 revealed an admission date of July 21, 2025, with diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, parkinsonism, shortness of breath, heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, depression, hypoxemia and acute kidney failure. Further review of the clinical record indicated physician orders for Resident R1 that included the following medications: insulin glargine subcutaneous solution (100 units/mL), with instructions to inject 20 units in the evening for diabetes; pramipexole dihydrochloride 0.5 mg orally at bedtime for Parkinson's disease; Eliquis 5 mg orally twice daily for atrial flutter; nifedipine extended-release 30 mg orally once daily for hypertension; and metoprolol succinate extended-release 25 mg orally once…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan for two of three newly admitted residents reviewed (Resident R38, and R45).Findings:A review of the facility policy titled Care Plans-Baseline, last revised in March 2022, revealed that, a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forth-eight (48) hours of admission. The baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care pf the resident that meet professional standards of quality care and must include a minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident including, but not limited to the following; initial goals based on admission orders and discussion with there resident/representative, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, social services, and PASSSAR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions consistent with the resident's assessed needs to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident R19).Findings Include:Review of facility policy Weight Assessment and Intervention revised February 2021 revealed resident weight will be measured on admission and weekly for four weeks thereafter. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be addressed by the Registered Dietitian.Review of Resident R19's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated May 31, 2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of cancer, diabetes mellitus, muscle wasting, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Continued review of Resident R19's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE], revealed the resident had signs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review facility policies and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment in resident care areas for one of two nursing units observed (CE Unit).Findings include:On February 9, 2026, at 10:45 a.m., an observation conducted in Room CE40 revealed that Resident R35 was seated in (her/his) wheelchair. The resident's bed was without sheets, a blanket, or a pillowcase. Two clear trash bags were observed next to Resident R35. One bag contained soiled linens, and the other contained a soiled brief and used gloves. The resident's toilet was observed to be soiled with brown feces on the interior surfaces.Additionally, a wound VAC machine was also observed on the floor next to the window in Resident R35's room. According to the resident's family member, the wound VAC machine was no longer in use and had been left on the floor for several days. The family member stated that Resident R35 was no longer receiving treatment with the device.On February 9, 2026, at 10:58 a.m., the above observations were confirmed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-02-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the State Survey Agency of an allegation of verbal abuse within 24 hours for one of 12 residents reviewed. (Resident R 41) Findings include: Review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of residents care needs) revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact and able to accurately report concerns. Continue review of Resident R41's clinical record revealed that the resident's diagnoses include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (failure of the body to produce insulin) without complications, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Muscle weakness, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility.Resident R41 revealed during interview conduct on February 9, 2026, at 12:19 PM that (he/she) was verbally abuse by staff.Facility Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the allegation of verbal abuse presented by Resident #41 on February 9, 2026 at 1:46 PM.Review of the Pennsylvania Electronic State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two of twelve residents reviewed (Residents R31 and R6).Findings:A review of the clinical record for Resident R31 revealed an admission date of December 29, 2025, with a diagnosis of periprosthetic fracture around the internal prosthetic left hip joint.Nursing progress notes dated January 7, 2026, at 2:56 p.m., indicated that the resident was observed to have redness to her right heel during the shift. No visible open area was present at that time. The resident denied pain and itching. An order was entered for skin preparation to the right heel daily. A voicemail message was left for the physician. The resident is identified as her own responsible party.A review of the wound tracking sheet documented that on January 14, 2026, the resident was noted to have a right heel deep tissue pressure injury (DTPI) measuring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for one of five residents observed during medication administration pass (Resident R31).Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled Administering Medication Revised April 2019, revealed medication are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. It further indicated under bulletin #4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescribed orders, including any required time frame. A review of the clinical record for Resident R31 revealed an admission date of December 29, 2025, with diagnoses including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).A review of the physician's order dated December 29, 2025, indicated that Resident R31 was prescribed Symbicort Inhalation Aerosol 160-4.5 mcg/act (budesonide-formoterol fumarate dihydrate), with instructions to inhale two puffs orally twice daily for COPD.On February 9, 2026, at 11:48…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, and interviews with residents, family members, and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain proper nail care for one of the 12 residents reviewed (Residents R6). Findings:A review of the clinical record for Resident R6 indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke caused by a blockage), muscle weakness, unspecified dementia, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), aphasia (impairment of communication), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hypertension (high blood pressure).Review of Resident R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated November 18, 2025, revealed that Resident R6 was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living to include hygiene, bed mobility, transfers, toilet use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to implement preventative care for a resident at risk of alterations in skin integrity for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident R49).Findings Include:Review of Resident R49's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated February 6, 2026, revealed the resident was newly admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), hypoxemia (low blood oxygen levels), need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility.Continued review of Resident R49's MDS dated [DATE], revealed the resident was identified as at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries.Review of Resident R49's admission skin evaluation dated February 1, 2026, revealed the resident was assessed with erythema (superficial reddening of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure enteral feedings were labeled in accordance with professional standards of practice, for one of one resident reviewed for tube feeding (Resident R6).Findings include:A review of the clinical record for Resident R6 indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke caused by a blockage), muscle weakness, unspecified dementia, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), aphasia (impairment of communication), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hypertension (high blood pressure).A review of the physician's order for Resident R6, dated September 16, 2025, indicated an enteral feeding order as follows: Glucerna 1.2 at a rate of 85 mL/hour for 18 hours, for a total volume of 1530 mL. Feeding to be initiated at 4:00 p.m. and discontinued at 10:00 a.m. each day.On February 9, 2026, at 11:06 p.m., an observation was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, observations of care and services, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide respiratory care and supplemental oxygen as ordered by the physician for one of one residents reviewed. (Resident R6).Findings include:A review of the clinical record for Resident R6 indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke caused by a blockage), muscle weakness, unspecified dementia, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), aphasia (impairment of communication), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hypertension (high blood pressure).On February 9, 2026, at 11:03 a.m., an observation with Registered Nurse, Employee E7 confirmed that Resident R6 was receiving oxygen therapy at 1.5 liters per minute. The oxygen tubing was not labeled, and the filter behind the concentrator was dirty, with a layer of dust.On February 12, 2026, at 2:02 p.m., a review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide pain management consistent with a resident's assessed needs for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident R45).Findings Include:Review of facility policy Pain - Clinical Protocol revealed with input from the resident, the physician and staff will establish goals of pain treatment.Review of Resident R45's Minimum Data Set (federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated November 15, 2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), peripheral vascular disease (narrowed arteries that reduce blood flow to the limbs), respiratory failure, and muscle weakness.Review of Resident R45's after visit summary from the hospital dated November 12, 2025, revealed oxycodone 10 milliliters (ml) solution was recommended as needed.Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and review of clinical records it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for one of 12 residents reviewed. Findings Include:Review of facility policy Medication Shortages/Unavailable Medications revealed when medications are unavailable the licensed nurse will urgently initiate action in cooperation with the attending physician and the pharmacy provider.Continued review of facility policy Medication Shortages/Unavailable Medications revealed a medication shortage is noted the nurse should notify the pharmacy and determine the status of the order. If the next available delivery results in a delay or missed dose in the resident's medication regimen the nurse should retrieve the medication from the emergency stock or request an emergency/stat delivery from the pharmacy. If an emergency delivery/emergency stock is not feasible, the licensed nurse should contact the attending physician and order orders which may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of observation, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly secure a medication for one of 12 residents reviewed. (Resident R38).Findings include: A review of Resident R38's clinical record revealed an admission date of January 2, 2026, with a diagnosis of glaucoma (increase eye pressure resulting in the inability of fluid to drain from the inner eye). A review of the physician's order dated January 2, 2026, revealed an order for Dorzolamide HCl ophthalmic solution 2%, instill one drop in both eyes twice daily for glaucoma. On February 9, 2026, at 12:02 p.m., observation revealed the Dorzolamide HCl ophthalmic solution was located in Resident R38's bed. Resident R38 reported that the nurse left the medication at her bedside during the night shift. On February 9, 2026, at 1:59 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident R38, who reported that at times nursing staff would give (her/him) eye drop medication and Resident R38 would administer the medication (herself/himself). On February 9, 2026, at 2:05 p.m., an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control standards related to the use of personal protective equipment and wound care for one of 12 residents reviewed. (Resident R5)Findings Include:Review of memo Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services dated March 20, 2024, revealed enhanced barrier precautions (EBP- involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities ) recommendations include use of EBP for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices during high-contact resident care activities regardless of their multidrug-resistant organism status.Review of facility policy Wound Care revealed staff should use disposable cloth to establish a clean field on resident's overbed table. The licensed staff should place all items to be used during procedure on the clean field and arrange the supplies so they can…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the call light was within easy reach for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident R49). Findings Include:Review of facility policy Answering the Call Light revised October 2010 revealed when the resident is in bed or confined to a chair, the call light should be within easy reach of the resident.Review of Resident R49's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated February 6, 2026, revealed the resident was newly admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), hypoxemia (low blood oxygen levels), need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility.Review of Resident R49's comprehensive care plan dated February 2, 2026, revealed the resident had an activity of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, review of facility documents and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate an allegation of verbal abuse by two of four residents reviewed. (Resident R1 and Resident R2)Findings include: Review facility policy entitled Abuse Prevention Program dated January 1 2022 and reviewed on November 30 2022, revealed that under section Policy Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation this includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, and voluntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse and physical or chemical restraints not required to treat the resident symptoms. Under section Policy Implementation #6. Identify and assess all possible incidents of abuse. # 7. Investigate and report any allegation of abuse within time frames as required by federal and state requirement. #8. Protect residents during abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that grievances are addressed in a timely manner for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R1).Review of the facility's policy entitled Grievances/Complaints, Filing revealed that under section Policy Statement residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances either orally or in writing to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances (i.e. the State Ombudsman). The Administrator and his staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of the resident and or representative. Under section Policy Interpretation and Implementation #1 Any resident, family member or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the facility. Grievances also may be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that advanced directives were in place for two of 13 clinical records reviewed (Resident R149 and Resident R26). Findings include: Review of facility Policy on Advance Directives with a most recent revision date of 2016 revealed that under section Policy Statement: Advance directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy. Policy Interpretation and Implementation #1. Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. #7. Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record. #10. The plan of care for each resident will be consistent with his or her documented treatment preferences and/or advance directive. Review of Resident R149's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to identify the placement of beds against the wall as a restraint three one of 13 residents reviewed. (Residents R247, R248, R249). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Use of Restraints, revised 2017, revealed physical restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restrics freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body. Further review of policy Use of Restraints revealed the definition of a restraint is based on the functional status of the resident and not the device. If the resident cannot remove a device in the same manner in which the staff applied it given that resident's physical condition, and this restrics his/her typical ability to change postion or place, that device is considered a restraint.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the faciltiy failed to ensure that a baseline care plan was developed for one of 13 residents reviewed. (Resident R149) Findings include: Review of facility policy on care plan, Comprehensive-Person Centered revealed that. Under Section Policy Statement, a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the residents physical, psychological and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Under section Policy Interpretation and Implementation. Revealed that. #1 The interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident and his or her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. #7. The comprehensive person-centered care plan: #a. includes measurable objectives and time frames. #b. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plan for one of thirteen residents reviewed related to weight changes(Resident R33). Findings Include: Review of facility policy on care plan, Comprehensive-Person Centered revealed that. Under Section Policy Statement, a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the residents physical, psychological and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Under section Policy Interpretation and Implementation. Revealed that. #1 The interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident and his or her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. #7. The comprehensive person-centered care plan: #a. includes measurable objectives and time frames. #b. describes the services that are to be furnished to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain adequate grooming of residents that required staff assistance with activities of daily living for two of 13 residents reviewed (Resident R243, R244). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed Resident R243 was admitted to the facility February 15, 2025 with a diagnosis that included but not limited to chondrocalcinosis (form of arthritis that causes sudden episodes of pain and swelling in joints), lack of coordination, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident R243's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated February 27, 2025, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Observation on March 04, 2025 at 12:05 p.m. revealed Resident R243's beard was not adequately groomed. Interview on March 04, 12:07 p.m. with Resident R243 and Resident R243's family member revealed resident has not been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based review of clinical records, facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice and physician orders, to promote healing of pressure ulcers and prevent development of pressure ulcers for one of 13 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to fracture of lower end of left femur (break in the thigh bone), closed fracture with routine healing, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated February 10, 2025, revealed in section GG00130 Resident R1 was dependent for ability to roll from lying on back to left and right side, and return to lying on back on the bed. Further review revealed in section M0150, Resident R1 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based staff interviews and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that weekly weights were obtained as ordered by physician for 2 out of 13 residents reviewed (Resident R1, Resident R33). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to fracture of lower end of left femur (break in the thigh bone), closed fracture with routine healing, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated February 12, 2025 for resident to be weighed weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly. Review of Resident R1's weight record revealed the the resident was weighted at the time admission on [DATE]- 129.0 pounds. Continued review of weight record revealed no documented evidence that the resident was weighted weekly as ordered by the physician. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed no documented evidence that Resident R1 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow recommendations to maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition for a resident receiving enteral nutrition for one of two residents reviewed. (Resident R33) Findings include: Review of Resident R33's clinical record revealed that Resident R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to Pleural effusion (build up of fluid in lungs), muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident R33's care plan revealed that resident requires tube feeding related to dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and intervention initiated for Registered Dietitian to evaluate quarterly and as needed, monitor caloric intake, estimate needs and make recommendations for changes to tube feeding as needed. Review of Resident R33's clinical record revealed a physician order dated December 30, 2024 for one time a day Jevity 1.5 (tube feed) at 20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care services related to changing and labelling respiratory equipment's and administering oxygen as ordered by the physician for two of thirteen residents reviewed. (Residents R146 and R149). Findings Include: A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Review of Resident R146's clinical record revealed that Resident R146 was admitted to the facility February 23, 2025, with diagnoses of but not limited to Acute Respiratory Failure, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), and Anemia (low blood count) Review of Resident R146's physician orders revealed an order for O2 (Oxygen) at 2L (liters)/min via NC (nasal Cannula), continuously every shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that appropriate pain management was provided to a resident consistent with standards of professional practice for one of thirteen residents reviewed (Resident R148). Findings include: Review of thefacility policy entitled Pain assessment and management revealed that under section Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to help the staff identify pain in the resident and to develop interventions that are consistent with the resident's goals and needs and that address the underlying causes of pain. Under Section General Guidelines: #1 The pain management program is based on facility wide commitment to appropriate assessment and treatment of pain, based on professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan and the resident's choices related to pain management. #2. Pain management is defined as the process of alleviating the residents pain based on his or her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with resident and staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the safe and effective use of medications in a manner that minimizes medication-related adverse consequences or events related to drug allergies for one of thirteen residents reviewed. (Resident R148) Findings include: Review of Resident R148's clinical record revealed that Resident R148 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to: Spinal Stenosis, Low Back Pain, Pain in Leg, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Allergy Review of Resident R148's list of allergies revealed that resident R148 was allergic to and the allergic reaction the following medications: Allergen: Fentanyl (opioid) Reaction Manifestation: Anaphylaxis, Hives, Shortness of breath, Angio-edema Severity: Severe Allergen: Hydrocodone (opioid) Reaction Manifestation: Hives, Itching Severity: Unknown Allergen: Hydromorphone (opioid) Reaction Manifestation: Anaphylaxis, Hives, SOB (shortness of breath), Angio-edema…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of facility procedures, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of facility undated dating and labeling procedure guide revealed that all items in the refrigerator must be dated and labeled with a date, use by date, initials, and item name. An initial tour of the main kitchen was conducted on May 3, 2034, at 8:56 a.m. with the facility Administrator, Employee E1, and Kitchen Supervisor, Employee E3. Observations revealed that the main cook was not wearing a hair net while cooking in the main kitchen area. Observations in the main refrigerator revealed all items were dated with one date, March 28, 2024, including defrosted pork loins, cheddar cheese, mozzarella cheese, and yogurt. Interview with the kitchen supervisor, Employee E3 revealed that the day, March 28, 2024, indicated the open date. Further observations revealed that pulled ham was dated May 25, 2024, and the cheese was dated April 1, 2024.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility documentation, review of personnel files and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a nurse aide had a minimum of 12-hour annual training to ensure continuing competence as required for five of five employees reviewed. (Employee E15, E16, E17, E18 and E19) Finding include: A request was made to the facility Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing for annual training records for five nursing assistants, Employees E15, E16, E17, E18 and E19 on May 8, 2024, at 10:15 a.m. Facility did not submit training records for Employees E15, E16, E17, E18 and E19. Interview with the facility Administrator on May 8, 2024, at 1:30 p.m. confirmed that the facility did not track, and complete annual in-service as required by the training requirements for nursing assistants. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3) Management 28 Pa. 211.12(c) Nursing services

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview with staff, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain confidentiality of residents' medical records and provide privacy to a resident during incontinence care for two of 12 residents reviewed (Resident R30 and R41). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, HIPPA Training Program revised 2007, revealed that the facility staff must ensure the confidentiality if residents protected information. Interview with Resident R22's Power of Attorney (POA), on May 6, 2024, at 1:39 p.m. revealed that she had requested her mother's Resident R22's, medical records on March 27, 2024. On March 28, 2024, she had received her mothers' medical records which contained Resident R30's medical information. Resident R22's POA provided pictures of Resident R30's protected health information to the surveyor, in the conference room. Review of facility documentation titled, Disclosure/release of prohibited health information and interview with the Medical Records Staff, Employee E4, confirmed that Resident R22's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the physician orders related to weekly weights for one of 13 residents reviewed (Residents R37). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, revised September 2008, revealed that the multidisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for residents. Nursing will measure resident weights weekly for two weeks on admission. Review of physician orders for Resident R37 revealed an order dated, April 27, 2024, for weekly weights x 4 weeks; in the morning every Friday. Review of Resident R37's clinical records revealed the last registered weight of 170.5 pounds on April 26, 2024. Interview with the Registered Dietitian, Employee E6, on May 7, 2024, at 2:07 p.m. confirmed that there were no further documented weights for Resident R37. Further interview revealed that after immediately reweighing Resident R37 on May 7, 2024, his weight registered 157 pounds.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, review of clinical records, observations and resident, resident representative and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that foot care needs were provided timely for one of 13 residents reviewed (Resident R38). Findings include: Review of care plan for Resident R38 dated April 3, 2024, revealed that the resident required assistance for Activities of Daily Living functions. Observation of Resident R38 on May 3, 2024 at 10:33 a.m., revealed that the resident had long and thick toenails on both feet. Resident R38's representative statedat the time of the observation that he asked staff to consult a podiatrist at least five times but no response was received. Interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on May 7, 2024 at 12:00 p.m. confirmed that resident's toe nails were long and a podiatrist should have consulted. He also confirmed that there was no appointment made for Resident R38. DON also stated facility had a podiatry service physician that comes into the building as needed and for emergency. Review of progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a physician assessment was completed related to unplanned weight loss for one of 3 residents with weight loss reviewed (Resident R21). Findings include: Review of facility policy Weight Assessment and Intervention dated September 2008, revealed that Weight Assessment The nursing staff will measure resident weights on admission, the next day, and weekly for two weeks thereafter. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria [where percentage of body weight loss = (usual weight- actual weight) (usual weight) x 100): 1 month -5% weight loss is significant; greater than 5% is severe a. 3 months =7.5% weight loss is significant; greater than 7.5% is severe. 6 months - 10% weight loss is significant; greater than 10% is severe. The Physician and the multidisciplinary team will identify conditions and medications that may be causing anorexia, weight loss or increasing the risk of weight loss. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with professional standards for one of one medication storage rooms observed (first floor cart A and second floor medication storage room). Findings include: Observation of the facility east medication storage room on May 6, 2024, at 10:14 a.m., revealed that the storage room was open. The door had a lock, but it was left unlocked. Observation inside the medication storage room revealed that there was a medication refrigerator with medications. The refrigerator had metal hooks for locks, but the lock was missing. Interview with Employee E11, Licensed Practical Nurse, on May 6, 2024, at 10:14 a.m. confirmed that the medication storage room and the refrigerator was unlocked. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code. 211.12(c) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1) Nursing services.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the facility's planned written menus, menu extensions, and facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow approved vegetarian diet to ensure nutritional adequacy for one of 13 residents reviewed. (Resident R21) Findings included: Review of an undated facility policy Vegetarian Diet revealed that, The vegetarian Diet accommodates the food preference of the individuals avoiding certain animal food in their diet. Upon admission, the nursing will submit a Tray Card Slip to the dietary department denoting the physician's order for vegetarian diet. The patient will be placed on a vegetarian diet. Review of facility documentation revealed that the facility had a vegetarian extension of the cycle menu. Review of an admission nutritional assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was on a vegetarian and on a cardiac diet. Resident weighed 132 pounds with a BMI of 20.7, with an estimated calorie need of 2000-2200 kcal 63-83 g of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences for one of 13 residents reviewed. (Resident R37) Findings Include: Review of Resident R37's admission nutrition assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had a lactose allergy and intolerance to lactose. Review of physician orders dated April 18, 2024, revealed an order for lactose intolerance, no milk. Further review of resident's nutrition assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident R37 had a lactose allergy and intolerance. Further review revealed an order dated May 2, 2024, for fortified foods one time a day for nutritional supplement Super Cereal. Interview with Resident R37 and his wife, on May 3, 2024, at 2:07 p.m. revealed that Resident R37 cannot tolerate a single dairy product. Further interview revealed that the resident had requested a nutritional supplement, Boost Breeze (fruit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed provide food items consistent with the prescribed diet order for two of 10 residents observed during dining (Resident R25, R14). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, Therapeutic Diets, undated, revealed that 'therapeutic diets are prepared and served as ordered by the attending physician. Review of physician orders for Resident R25 confirmed an order dated, October 14, 2022, for health shake three times a day and double portions dated August 24, 2024. Observations during dining, on May 6, 2024, at 12:57 p.m. revealed Resident R25's meal ticket indicated that the resident was ordered to receive double portions and a mighty shake supplement. Observations revealed resident was not served a double portion lunch meal which consisted of ham, and a mighty shake supplement. Review of physician orders for Resident 14 confirmed an order dated October 14, 2022, for a Health Shake. Observation of dining, on May 6, 2024, at 12:57 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility related to failing to ensure that one of three residents reviewed (Resident R20) was provided with nutritional interventions, timely nutritional assessments, notification to the resident's physican of the resident's weight loss, and that the resident was provided an appropriate vegetarian diet. This failure resulted in Resident R20 experiencing unplanned significant weight loss of 43 pounds in 5 months and in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. (Resident R20) Findings include: Review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator revealed, The The Administrator establish and maintain systems that are effective and efficient to operate the facility in a manner to safely meet residents needs in compliance with federal, state and local requirements; establish and maintain systems that are effective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sufficient documentation regarding the basis for the discharge for one of five records reviewed (Resident CL1). Findings include: Review of Resident CL1's discharge MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool) dated January 26, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had BIMS score of 15, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. Interview conducted on February 14, 2024, at 11:30 a.m. with the Social Worker, Employee E3, revealed that the resident's daughter had called Employee E3 on Friday, January 26, 2024, and requested for her mother to be discharged that day. Social Worker, Employee E3 told the daughter that she cannot be discharged today because there is no doctor in the building and that the discharge process would have to take place on Monday, January 2, 2024. Social Worker, Employee E3,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-02-13 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of facility assessment and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure include the direct care staff and input from residents, resident representatives and family members when conducting the facility assessment.Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Facility Assessment, last revised in June 2024, revealed that a facility assessment is conducted annually to determine and update the capacity to meet the needs of, and competently care for, residents during day-to-day operations, including nights, weekends, and emergencies. The policy further describes the team responsible for conducting, reviewing, and updating the facility assessment under bulletin #2. The team includes leadership and management, such as the Administrator, a representative of the governing body, the Medical Director, the Director of Nursing, and other department heads as needed. It also includes direct staff, such as RNs, LPNs/LVNs, nursing assistants, and a representative of the direct staff if applicable. Finally, the policy indicates that residents,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,902 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,902 — penalty dated 2024-05-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HAVERFORD HOLDING COMPANY INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/30/2021
FREDERICKS, JOHNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/30/2021
BRAUNSTEIN, MIRIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/30/2021
IKE, AKIKOIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/30/2021
WAKE, CORYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/30/2021
COMPASSIONATE CARE HEALTHCARE CONSULTANTS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/30/2021

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$857K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 23%Other / private 77%

This home reported $857K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$454per resident / day
operating cost
$13,811per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$406per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395095. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next