No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Wecare At South Hills Rehabilitation And Nrsg Ctr

201 Village Drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317 · For profit - Corporation · 104 certified beds · (724) 746-1300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus Facility (federal watch list)Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0565, F0567, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744)4 immediate-jeopardy citations$51,111 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $51,111 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-04)
  • nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

/5
CMS overall
Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verifiedNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facilityNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1200 Ashwood Dr Ste 1203 · (412) 756-3210 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
100 Cavasina Dr · (724) 873-8790 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2480 Washington Road
Park
2403 Washington Rd · (724) 949-0007 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
120 Anderson Dr · (724) 745-9066

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measuresNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-03, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2026-03 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.

Overall ratingnot rated now
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.4%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.1%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.5%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.4%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.9%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.2%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.2%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.7%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.4%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.8%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.9%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.3%9.5%12.0%typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.50U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 5.6–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.811.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
0.85
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.77
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.15
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
65.4%
Total nursing turnover
73.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 64.1 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-04)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2026-01-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

62 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility review of policy, manufacturer's instructions, clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify physicians of elevated or decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels, failed to assess residents for hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) and hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), and failed to ensure the provision of insulin (injectable medication to treat high blood sugar) according to physicians' orders and manufacturing instructions which resulted in immediate jeopardy for eight of fourteen residents (R4, R6, R11, R19, R25, R32, R47, and R56).Review of the United States Food and Drug Administration prescribing information dated 03/2013, indicated that Humalog (insulin lispro) is a rapid acting insulin and directed to Administer within 15 minutes before a meal or immediately after a meal. Review of the United States Food and Drug Administration prescribing information dated 02/2015, indicated that Novolog (insulin aspart) and Should be generally given immediately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility provided policies and documentation, clinical records, and resident, family, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This failure resulted in a resident with a known history of sexually inappropriate behavior touching non-consenting residents, which created an Immediate Jeopardy situation for five of 67 residents (Resident R2, R3, R4, R5, R6). Findings include:Review of facility Abuse and Neglect Policy reviewed 1/27/25, Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of state laws, facility policy and documents, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to report allegations of abuse for four of 67 residents (Resident R2, R3, R5, and R6). This failure resulted in a resident with a known history of sexually inappropriate behavior touching non-consenting residents, which created an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include:Review of the Older Adult Protective Services Act of 11/6/87, amended by Act 1997-13, Chapter 7, Section 701, requires any employee or administrator of a facility who suspects abuse is mandated to report the abuse. All reports of abuse should be reported to the local area agency on aging and licensing agencies. If the suspected abuse is sexual abuse, serious bodily injury, or suspicious death, the law requires additional reporting to the Department of Aging and local law enforcement.Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary supervision of a resident with known sexually inappropriate behaviors. This failure resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation for five of 67 residents (Resident R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, ).Findings include:Review of the facility, Resident Supervision Policy & Procedures effective 2/1/25, indicated, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all residents receive appropriate levels of supervision based on their individual needs, as identified through comprehensive and ongoing assessment. The goal of this policy is to promote resident safety, maintain dignity, and prevent accidents, neglect, or adverse events. Review of the facility, Behavior Management Policy revised 2/2/25, indicated, Patients exhibiting behavioral symptoms will be individually evaluated. The interdisciplinary team will identify underlying medical, physical, functional,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that one of 26 residents was free from sexual abuse that resulted in the actual harm of a newly diagnosed sexually transmitted infection for one of 26 residents (Resident R29). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol, last reviewed 10/23/24, indicated that residents have the right to be free from abuse, as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, or causes physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology. Neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job descriptions, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to effectively manage the facility to provide care for residents with diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time) consistent with standard nursing practices. This failure resulted in facility failures to notify physicians of elevated or decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels, failures to assess residents for hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) and hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), and failures to ensure the provision of insulin (injectable medication to treat high blood sugar) according to physicians' orders and manufacturing instructions which resulted in immediate jeopardy for eight of fourteen residents (R4, R5, R11, R19, R25, R32, R47, and R56).Findings include: Review of the facility-provided Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) job description indicated, Leads, guides and directs the operations of the healthcare facility in accordance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, federal regulation, and a staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide transfer notices to representatives of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division for four of six months (December 2025 through March 2026).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Transfer or Discharge and Discharging the Resident dated 5/5/26 with a prior review date of 8/27/25, did not reveal evidence that the facility will provide notice to the Ombudsman and maintain documentation of the notice. Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations S483.15(c)(3) Notice Before Transfer: indicates, before a facility transfers or discharges a resident, the facility must (i) Notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. The facility must send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Federal Regulations further define emergency transfers as, When a resident is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that fresh drinking water was consistently readily accessible to residents to promote adequate hydration, meet resident preferences, and maintain their comfort for four of 20 residents reviewed (Residents 11, 19, 49, and 56).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Water Pitcher Pass/Cleaning dated 5/5/26 with a prior review date of 8/27/25, indicated the Nursing staff will fill water pitchers/Styrofoam cups with ice and fresh water placing them at bedside. Water will be provided/passed every shift unless contraindicated by their diagnosis or physician order. The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated that a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility to make certain that medical supplies were properly stored and/or disposed of in one of two medication rooms (B/C Medication Room).Findings include: Review of the United States Food and Drug Administration prescribing information dated November 2013, indicated, Vials in use for more than 30 days should be discarded. Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications dated 5/5/26, indicated medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. During an observation of the B/C Medication Room on 6/1/26, at 2:25 p.m. the following was observed: (2) open, partially used containers of protein powder with an expiration date of 3/18/26.(2) 1500 mL bottles of tube feeding formula with a use by date of 5/1/26.(1) Set of glucometer testing solution with an expiration date of 4/9/26.(1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to properly store food products at safe temperatures in the Main Kitchen, which created the potential for foodborne illness in one of one deep freezer. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Food Storage dated 8/27/2025, indicated that the facility will maintain proper temperatures in all storage areas. The proper temperature ranges for freezer units are 0 degrees Fahrenheit or below. During an observation of the main kitchen on 3/24/26, at 1:00 p.m., it was revealed the freezer door was ajar and the external temperature gauge read 8 degrees Fahrenheit. The freezer door was closed and at 1:25 p.m. the temperature reading was noted to be 20 degrees Fahrenheit. At 1:40 p.m. the temperature of the freezer was noted to be 20 degrees Fahrenheit. It was noted at that time that the internal thermostat was set to come on at 15 degrees Fahrenheit and turn off at 10 degrees Fahrenheit. At 2:00 p.m. it was noted that the freezer temperature was at 0 degrees Fahrenheit,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 10 of 15 residents (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, and R10) and for four of five staff members (Employee E1, E2, E3, and E4).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, Answering the Call Light dated 8/27/25, indicated, The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs. Review of the facility policy, Activities of Daily Living, (ADL), Supporting dated 6/1/25, indicated, Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. During an observation on 2/17/26, at approximately 10:56 a.m. Resident R1 was noted to have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to properly store food products in the Main Kitchen, which created the potential for foodborne illness.Findings include:Review of the facility policy Food Storage, dated 8/27/25, indicated that food shall be stored to facilitate thorough cleaning, and areas will be maintained in a clean, safe sanitary manner. A thermometer is available in a storeroom, freezer and refrigerator units. During an observation on 1/20/26, from 8:50 a.m., through 9:15 a.m., the following was observed:The drink/food line cooler did not have an internal thermometer. The refrigerator and deep freezer had food stored approximately 3 inches from the ceilings During an interview on 1/20/26, at 9:15 a.m., the Dietary Supervisor Employee E8 confirmed that the facility failed to properly store food products in the Main Kitchen, which created the potential for foodborne illness. Pa. 28 Code: 211.6(c)(d)(f) Dietary services.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify physicians of increased and decreased capillary blood glucose (CBG) levels for two of five residents (Resident R11 and R52).Findings: Review of the facility policy, Nursing Care of the Older Adult with Diabetes Mellitus (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time) dated 8/27/25, indicated, The provider will order the frequency of glucose monitoring and establish appropriate glycemic targets for individual residents. The policy indicated for the facility to establish provider notification guidelines, and provided examples of possible guidelines. Further review failed to reveal a specific facility protocol. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R11 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R11's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/9/25, included diagnoses of dementia (a group…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident council group interview, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for clean public shower areas and equipment for two of two resident shower rooms (B/C and A/E shower rooms), failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for two of four resident hallways (B/C Hallways), and two of two resident lounges B/C and A/E resident lounges).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Homelike environment dated 8/27/25, indicated to provide a safe, clean and comfortable environment. Provide a clean, sanitary, and orderly environment and provide comfortable and safe temperatures between 71 and 81.During a tour on 1/21/26, at 2:20 p.m. with the Nursing Home Administrator the following observations were noted:-B/C shower room had a dark brown/black substance in the grout of the shower's floor, cracked tiles at base of the shower and the wall. Thes shower chairs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to update a care plan for two of six residents (Residents R50 and R58) to accurately reflect the current status of the resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 8/27/25, indicated the person-centered care plan describes services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being including services for each element of care. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R50's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/9/25, indicated diagnoses of diabetes (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), obstructive sleep apnea (a chronic condition in which the throat muscles relax during sleep and the airway may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 47 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0685 — pattern
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policies, clinical record reviews, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident receives proper treatment and services to maintain hearing abilities for five of eight residents reviewed for hearing (Residents R3, R26, R36, R48 and R23). Findings include:Review of the facility policy Consults Policy and Procedures, dated 8/27/25, indicated to ensure all in-facility consults are timely, clinically indicated and in compliance, the facility nursing staff shall notify the attending provider of the consulting provider's recommendations, review the attending physician's acceptance of the recommendation and monitor the compliance with the recommended treatment.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R3 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included traumatic brain injury, obesity, stroke and heart fibrillation. An MDS (Minimum Data Set- a periodic review of resident needs) dated 11/4/25, indicated the diagnoses remained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical record, review of facility policy, interview with staff and residents, it was determined the facility failed to provide tracheostomy care consistent with professional standards of practice for one resident with a tracheostomy (Resident R25), and failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and maintain respiratory equipment for five of five residents (Resident R25, R41, R50, R65, and R74). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Tracheostomy Care dated 8/27/25, indicated a replacement tracheostomy tube (a hollow tube inserted into a surgical opening in the neck (stoma) directly into the windpipe to provide long-term ventilation) must be available at the bedside at all times. A suction machine must be available at the bedside at all times. Review of the facility policy Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) - Prevention of Infection last reviewed on 8/27/25, indicated that considerations related to oxygen administration include change the oxygen cannula and tubing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified Food Service Director to manage the daily operations of the Dietary Department for 12 out of 12 months (February 2025 through January 2026).Findings include:During an interview on 1/20/26, at approximately 9:00 a.m., the Dietary Supervisor Employee E8 stated she was not certified and that the Dietician only works two days a week in the facility and another two days in another facility.During an interview on 1/20/26, at 11:20 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator stated that the Registered Dietitian (RD) was not employed full time she comes two times a week.During an interview on 1/20/26, 11:20 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the facility failed to provide documented evidence that Dietary Supervisor Employee E8 met the qualifications for the position of Food Service Director. Pa Code: 201.18(e)(6) Management.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility admission documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident rights to make informed decisions and choices in the residents' welfare by making certain residents understand the conditions of a binding arbitration agreement and failed to ensure the agreement is explained to the resident and his or her representative in a form and manner that he or she understands, including in a language the resident and his or her representative understands for two of five residents (Resident R27 and R48).Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User ' s Manual effective October 2025 indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment). The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions:13-15: cognitively intact8-12: moderately impaired0-7: severe impairment Review of the facility's admission packet contained the document Alternative Dispute Resolution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the potential for cross contamination while during wound care for one of six residents (Resident R8), failed to maintain two ice machines in a sanitary manner ( A/E wing and B/C wing ice machines), failed to properly monitor residents in room personal refrigerator temperatures for two of two residents (Residents R33 and R64) which created the potential for food borne illness and failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for one of eight residents (Resident R6).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Dressings, Dry/Clean dated 8/27/25, indicated in the Steps in the Procedure to cleanse hands between glove changes. Review of facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 8/27/25, indicated the facility will implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). Examples of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a fully functioning resident call bell system that allows residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area in two of five rooms (Resident R10 and R46).Findings include: To ensure accessibility, the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) Standards for Accessible Design dated 9/15/10, indicated that emergency call system pull cords must be accessible to individuals with disabilities, ensuring they can reach the activation point from a seated or fallen position. While specific string length is not explicitly defined in inches by the ADA, the cord must be reachable, the operating mechanism must be within the ADA reach range of 15 to 48 inches from the floor Review of the facility policy Call System, Residents dated 8/27/25, indicated, Each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his/her bed, from toileting/bathing facilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect a resident from neglect for one of three residents resulting in pain and the need for Xray's to rule out possible injuries/ fractures for one of three residents (Resident R11).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Abuse and Neglect dated 8/27/25, indicated that neglect is the failure of the facility to provide services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's dementia, obstructive uropathy, glaucoma, obesity, lack of coordination, and history of right open repair internal fixation of right hip (ORIF). An MDS (Minimum Data Set- a periodic review of a resident care needs) dated 10/24/25, indicated the diagnoses remained current. An MDS dated [DATE], Section G0110 (bed mobility) indicated bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, information provided by the facility, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to promptly conduct a thorough investigation to rule out neglect and implement corrective action and submit the results of the completed investigation to the State Survey Agency within five working days of the incident as evidenced by one of three residents reviewed (Resident R11).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Abuse and Neglect dated 8/27/25, indicated that neglect is the failure of the facility to provide services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Staff and management will help to identify situations that might constitute neglect. The facility will investigate alleged abuse and neglect to clarify what happened and identify possible causes. Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating dated 8/27/25, indicated that all reports of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility provided documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one of three residents (Resident R11).Findings include:Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]m with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's dementia, obstructive uropathy, glaucoma, obesity, lack of coordination, and history of right open repair internal fixation of right hip (ORIF). An MDS (Minimum Data Set- a periodic review of a resident care needs) dated 10/24/25, indicated the diagnoses remained current. An MDS dated [DATE], Section G0110 (bed mobility) indicated bed mobility as total assistance of two staff. Section GG0170 How much assistance required to perform task) indicated substantial/maximum assistance for turning left and right in bed. During an interview on 1/21/26, at 10:00 a.m., Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E6 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prescribed treatment and services related to an implanted venous port (a small implantable device placed under the skin usually in the chest to provide reliable long term venous access) for one of three residents (Resident R73), and failed to properly care for total parenteral nutrition (TPN - a method of delivering essential nutrients - fats, proteins, carbohydrates, electrolytes, and vitamins directly into the bloodstream via an intravenous (IV) catheter, bypassing the digestive system)for one of three residents (Resident R74).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Implanted Venous Port - Accessing dated 8/27/25, indicated to cover needle and access site with transparent sterile dressing when the port is accessed. Label dressing with date, time, and initials of the person who is performing the procedure.Review of the facility policy Total Parenteral Nutrition dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a trauma survivor with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for two of four residents (Resident R7 and R33). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Trauma Informed Care and Culturally Competent Care dated 8/27/25, indicated the purpose is to address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R7 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/10/25, indicated the diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a psychiatric disorder that may occur in persons that have witnessed a traumatic event causing intense, disturbing thoughts and feelings related to the experience), dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct accurate assessments to ensure that bedrails were used to meet residents' needs and the risks associated with bedrail usage for one of two residents (Residents R78).Findings include:Review of facility policy Bed Safety and Bed Rails dated 8/27/25, indicated the use of bed rails or side rails is prohibited unless the criteria for use of bed rails have been met, including attempts to use alternatives, interdisciplinary evaluation, resident assessment, and informed consent. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include Schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), bipolar (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), and paralytic syndrome (rapid onset of paralysis).Review of Resident R78's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate behavioral health services to maintain the highest practicable well-being for one of two sampled residents (Resident R33).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Behavioral health Services dated 8/27/25, indicated behavioral health services are provided to residents as needed as part of the interdisciplinary, person-centered approach to care.Review of the admission record indicated Resident R33 admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R33's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 1/14/26, indicated the diagnoses of heart failure (heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), anxiety, and depression.Review of Resident R33's current care plan indicated resident has a behavior problem of requesting staff to purchase gift cards for an online friend and requesting staff take her to the store to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy, resident interviews, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents are free of significant medication errors for one of five residents observed (Resident R73).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors dated 8/27/25, indicated a medication error is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biological which is not in accordance with physician's orders, manufacturer's specifications, or accepted professional standards and principles of the professional providing services. Examples include omission - a drug is ordered but not administered.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of diseases that block airflow and make it hard to breathe), heart failure (heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), and high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store medications properly, for one of two medication carts (A side medication cart).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications dated 8/27/25, indicated the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner.During an observation on 1/20/26, at 2:58 p.m. the A side medication cart indicated the following medications opened and not dated as required:-Budesonide inhalation suspension (medication that reduces airway inflammation)-Ipratropium bromide (medication that acts as a bronchodilator) - two boxes-Trelegy Ellipta (medication that's inhaled to treat chronic respiratory illness)-Lantus insulin pen (long-acting insulin used to regulate blood sugar)Interview on 1/20/26, at 2:58 p.m. Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E2 confirmed the medications listed were opened and not dated as required.Interview on 1/20/26, at 3:00 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to store medications properly,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-30 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and residents' financial account records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to return resident funds within 30 days of discharge/death to the appropriate party for one of five residents sampled (Resident R1 and Resident R2).Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cancer, high blood pressure, and diabetes. Review of facility documents revealed Resident R1 expired (passes away) on [DATE], at 6:41 a.m. During an interview on [DATE], at 12:30 p.m. Business Office Employee E1 stated the facility does not handle billing on site, the company uses the third-party company Wellsky. They stated, as of [DATE], Resident R1's responsible party was due a refund of $385.00. Review of an email provided by Business Office Employee E1, indicated Resident R1's family contacted the facility on [DATE], at 12:22 p.m. to inquire about the refund owed. The family had made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, clinical records, staff interviews and resident interviews it was determined the facility failed to submit, document and/or follow-up on concerns/grievances presented by staff and residents (staff and residents wished to remain anonymous).Finding include:Review of Federal Regulation 483.10(i)(1) The resident has the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatments which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other residents, and other concerns regarding their LTC facility stay.Review of facility policy, Skilled Nursing Facility Grievance Policy dated 1/27/25, revealed the facility is committed to maintaining transparent, fair, and accessible grievance process. Every grievance will be addressed promptly and appropriately, in accordance with federal and state regulations. Residents and their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Finding include:Review of the facility policy Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol dated 1/27/25, previously reviewed 10/23/24, indicated abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical conditions, cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology.Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating dated 1/27/25, previously reviewed 10/23/24, indicates all reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and documents, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to investigate allegations of abuse for four of 61 residents (Resident R2, R3, R5, and R6). This failure resulted in a resident with a known history of sexually inappropriate behavior touching non-consenting residents.Findings include:Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation dated 1/27/25, indicated All allegations are thoroughly investigated.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 7/7/25, included diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles) and physical debility. Review of Section C: Cognitive Patterns indicated Resident R3 was cognitively intact.Review of an electronic communication dated 8/12/25, provided to both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job descriptions, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to protect residents from resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This failure resulted in a resident with a known history of sexually inappropriate behavior touching a non-consenting resident, which created an Immediate Jeopardy for five of 67 residents (Resident R2, R3, R4, R5, R6).Findings include:Review of the facility-provided Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) job description indicated, The primary purpose of the job position is to manage the Facility in accordance with current applicable federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern long-term care facilities. To follow all facility policies and apply them uniformly to all employees. To ensure the highest degree of quality care is provided to our residents at all times.Review of the facility-provided Director of Nursing (DON) job description indicated, To plan, organize, develop and direct the overall operation of the Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, cited deficiencies from previous surveys, review of plan of correction documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program failed to correct previously cited deficiencies. This has the potential to affect 5 of 67 residents.Finding include:Review of the facility policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program dated 1/27/25, indicated objectives of the QAPI program include providing a means to measure current and potential indicators for outcomes of care and quality of life; establish and implement performance improvement projects to correct identified negative or problematic indicators; reinforce and build upon effective systems and processes related to the delivery of quality care and services; and establish systems through which to monitor and evaluate corrective actions.Review of the facility's deficiencies and plan of corrections for the State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending 2/3/25, revealed the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0575 — isolated
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post complete and current contact information for the Grievance Officer in the facility on three of three nursing units (Bird Room (Main area near dining room), Solarium C and Solarium E).Findings include:During an observation completed 8/21/25, through 8/22/25, of the Bird Room (common area), the facility failed to reveal the address and email contact information for Adult Protective Services and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program along with the Grievance Officer for the facility, observations revealed in Solarium C and Solarium E common areas, the facility failed to reveal the correct contact information for the Grievance Officer.During an interview on 8/22/25, at approximately 2:50 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to post complete contact information for Adult Protective Services, State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and the Grievance Officer as required in one resident common area and failure to list an updated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to meet resident care needs for residents to be in a relationship for four of 67 residents (Residents R1, R7, R21, and R35).Finding include:Review of the facility policy Care Planning/ Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team dated 1/27/25, previously reviewed 10/23/24, indicated the Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team shall serve as the authority for overseeing resident care services. The committee shall function as an advisory committee to the Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee. A comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessments.Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record and facility document review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary services to meet the psychosocial needs resulting in the commitment of resident-to-resident sexual abuse for one of two residents with unmonitored hypersexual behaviors (Resident R1). Findings include:Review of the facility, Behavior Management Policy revised 1/27/25, indicated, Patients exhibiting behavioral symptoms will be individually evaluated. The interdisciplinary team will identify underlying medical, physical, functional, psychosocial, emotional, psychiatric, or environmental causes that contribute to the resident's behavior(s).Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, effective October 2024, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact8-12: moderately impaired0-7: severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review,facility submitted documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse in the required timeframe for one of nine residents (Resident R29). Finding include: Review of facility policy Abuse and Neglect dated 10/23/24, indicated abuse is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. All allegations of abuse of unknown source must be reported immediately to the Administrator, Director of Nursing, and to the applicable State Agency. All serious incidents involving a resident will be reported to the Department of Health (State Agency) field office within 24 hours. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R29's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a periodic assessment of are needs) dated 11/14/24, indicated diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain call light tubes were in reach for one of two residents with a breath activated call light response system (Resident R53). Findings include: The facility policy Call Light Response dated 10/23/24, indicated to ensure a call bell or alternative device will be accessible to each resident while in their room, toilet, or bathing area. Review of Resident R53's clinical record indicated admission to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R53's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/4/24, indicated diagnoses of dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), muscle weakness, and rheumatoid arthritis (chronic, painful inflammatory disorder affecting many joints, including those in the hands and feet). Review of Section GG: Functional Abilities, indicated that Resident R53 has range…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident council minutes, resident and group interviews and interviews with staff and facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the residents were offered a private group meeting during resident council for 10 of 10 residents interviewed (Resident R10, R19, R26, R31, R40, R43, R50, R52, R54, R56). Finding include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Council reviewed 10/23/24, states the facility will provide space, privacy and support to conduct meetings. During Resident Group with ten alert and oriented residents on 2/5/25, at 1:00 p.m. Resident R10 and R43 indicated during resident council some of the members did not like to use their name if there was a concern or problem so the facility doesn't get told. Members of the resident council were asked , during the time they meet would it be more beneficial to meet in private than in the main dining room where staff and other residents continuously walk through and can hear the meeting going on, thus allowing residents to voice their concerns and the president can then take the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify resident representative and/or medical providers of a change in condition for two of six residents (Resident R29 and R62). Findings include: Review of the policy Health, Medical Condition and Treatment Options, Informing Resident Of, dated 10/23/24, indicated the responsible party or guardian is to be notified when there has been any change in condition, such as the diagnosis of an infection and the start of antibiotics. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2024, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment on one of two nursing units (A/E Nursing Unit) and for five of fourteen residents (Residents R15, R52, R53, R62, and R66). Findings include: During an observation on 2/3/25, at approximately 11:00 a.m., Resident R52's was noted to have trash on the floor, a drawer of the bedside table pulled out of the table and on its side, soiled washcloth and resident clothing on the floor, disposable cups and used gloves under the bed, and screws and a metal bracket on the windowsill. The foot board was removed from the bed and was lying on the floor in front of the wardrobe. The floor food residue adhered to it and dust and crumbs all over it. During an observation on 2/4/25, at approximately 8:40 a.m., an Environmental Service (EVS) Worker was seen entering Resident R52's room and emptying the trash can. No other services were performed. Observation at this time revealed no significant change from the previous observation on 2/3/25. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for eight of sixteen residents (Resident R30, R43, R54, R56, R64, R66, R69, and R70). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS, mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated the following instructions: Coding Instructions O0300A, Is the Resident's Pneumococcal Vaccination Up to Date? -Code 0, no: if the resident's pneumococcal vaccination status is not up to date or cannot be determined. Proceed to item O0300B, If Pneumococcal vaccine not received, state reason. -Code 1, yes: if the resident's pneumococcal vaccination status is up to date. Skip to O0350, Resident's COVID-19 vaccination is up to date. If the resident has not received a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documents, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to possibly prevent hospitalization and failed to provide care and services after hospitalization for one of four residents (Resident R22). Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 1/16/25, included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of progressive lung disorders characterized by increasing breathlessness), diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles). Review of Resident R22's weight record revealed the following: 04/03/24: 335.0 lbs. (pounds) 050/1/24: 322.0 lbs. 06/11/24: 325.0 lbs. 07/10/24: 378.2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe environment for two of five residents ordered fall precautions (Resident R41 and R63) and on one of two nursing units (A/E Nursing Unit). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Falls - Clinical Protocol dated 10/23/24, indicated when a resident is found on the floor, the facility is obligated to investigate into how the resident got there and put into place an intervention to minimize it from recurring. This will be documented in the resident's care plan and progress notes. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 12/9/24, included diagnoses of a seizure disorder and history of a stroke. Review of the fall assessment completed on 1/31/25, indicated Resident R41 was at medium risk for falls. Review of a physician order dated 7/10/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care/oxygen services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of four residents (Resident R22). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Oxygen Administration, with a review date of 10/23/24, purpose is to improve oxygenation in residents with respiratory insufficiency, obstructive sleep apnea, or restrictive/obstructive lung disease. This includes verification of a physician order for use of device, regulator checking equipment and periodic assessment. The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that Section O: Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs, Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilator (BiPAP/CPAP) should be checked if the resident utilized a BiPAP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medications and biologicals were properly disposed of in one of two medication rooms (Units B/C medication room). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications dated 10/23/24, indicated that discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. During an observation of the Units B/C medication room medication room on 2/3/25, at approximately 11:30 a.m. four opened, partially used bottles of acetic acid solution (a type of antiseptic), with open dates of 1/22/25, 1/25/25, 1/31/25, and 2/1/25 were observed. On each of the bottles was a pre-printed pharmacy label that read: BOTTLE EXPIRES 24 HOURS AFTER OPENING. During an interview on 2/3/25, at 2:36 p.m. Registered Nurse Employee E2 confirmed the above observations. During an interview on 2/6/25, at approximately 3:30 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain residents who requested the pneumococcal vaccine were provided the vaccination for six of seven residents (Resident R43, R54, R56, R64, R69, and R70). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Pneumococcal Vaccination dated 10/23/24, previously reviewed 1/18/24, indicated all residents are offered the pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. Review of the admission Record indicated that Resident R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R43's Pneumococcal Vaccine Informed Consent/Declination form, dated 8/9/24, revealed Resident R43 consented to receive the pneumococcal vaccination. Review of Resident R43's clinical record failed to reveal the pneumococcal vaccine was provided. Review of the admission Record indicated that Resident R54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, documents, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Administering Medications 1/18/24, indicated medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The policy further stated that the individual administering the medication records in the resident's medical record: -the date and time the medication was administered; -the dosage; -the route of administration; -the injection site (if applicable); -any complaints or symptoms for which the drug was administered; -any results achieved and when those results were observed; and -the signature and title of the person administering the drug. Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and documentation, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate response to grievances from resident council for six of six months ( January 2024, February 2024, March 2024, April 2024, May 2024, June 2024). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Grievance/Concern Resolution dated 1/18/24, indicated to resolve resident concerns in a timely manner, facility utilizes a grievance form to identify concerns and track via a monthly log. Unable to review resident council meeting minutes for indication of any concerns. During an interview on 7/18/2024, at 10:30 a.m. and 1:38 p m. Residents indicated that residents' concerns are not being addressed and are on-going. During an interview on 7/18/24 at 1:34 p.m., with the previous Resident Council president it was discussed that the resident was relieved of their duties while unavailable and a new president was named in their place with no vote occurring. During an interview on 7/18/2024, at 2:48 p.m. Nursing Home Administrator and Regional Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a resident group interview and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities based on the identified preferences/interests for seven of seven residents to enhance the resident's quality of life (Residents R100, R101, R102, R103, R104, R105 and R106). Findings include: During an attempted review of facility activity calendars, there were no Activities Calendars for the dates May 2024- June 2024. There is a calendar in all residents rooms listing one activity each day with no time associated for these activities. During an interview on 7/18/24 at 9: 23 a.m., the Ombudsman indicated that they had been contacted by residents that were complaining that there were no activities occurring. The Ombudsman had contacted the previous Nursing Home Administrator that stated they would take care of the situation. During an interview on 7/18/24, at 1:30 p.m.,Resident Council president indicated that activities were occurring until the Activities Director was terminated April 3, 2024. During an interview on 7/18/24, at 2:30 p.m. the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility policy, Resident Council Meeting minutes, facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Activities Department had a qualified director to oversee the activities program for three out of six months (April, May, June). The findings include: Review of Activities Director job description/competency/evaluation last reviewed on 1/18/24, indicated the education and qualifications for the job of Activities Director included post-secondary education in a related field is desired, and two years experience as a supervisor or long-term care Activity Director or previous work experience under a Certified Activity Consultant. Review of the previous Activity Director Employee personnel file indicated they became the activities director on 6/23/23 and then was terminated 4/3/24. Further review did not include information regarding a replacement being hired. During interviews and observations on 7/18/24 at 11:30 a.m., residents that stated there have been no activites since the previous Activities Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical and facility record review, facility submitted documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one of six residents (Resident R1). Review of the facility policy Resident Elopement dated 1/17/24, indicated cognitively impaired residents at risk for elopement will be appropriately monitored to reduce the potential for injury. Elopement is defined as a resident leaving the physical structure of the facility without knowledge of facility staff. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/1/24, included diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), arthritis (inflammation of one or more joints, causing pain and stiffness), and dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable, home-like environment for one of two resident shower rooms (C-Wing shower room). Findings include: Review of facility policy Clean, Safe and Orderly Environment, last reviewed 1/17/23, indicated the facility will be maintained in clean, safe, and orderly manner. Housekeeping, Laundry, and Maintenance services will be provided properly with precautions taken to prevent infection and cross contamination. During an observation on 3/1/24, at 1:00 p.m. the following was noted in the C-Wing shower room: -First shower area: Numerous partially used, resident specific hygiene items (shampoo, body wash, deodorant) on the shower floor, nail clippers on the floor, and a plastic caddy with hygiene items in it. A plastic cover for a curtain rod was on the floor of the shower. Numerous adhesive stickers from the tops of baby powder containers adhered to the shower wall. A brown substance that appeared to be feces was on the shower floor. -Second shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-04 · tag F0836 — pattern
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of vendor invoices, facility financial documents, and interviews with vendors and staff, it was determined that facility failed to pay bills in a timely manner. Findings include: Review of 28 PA Code Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations, subsection §201.14(g), dated 7/1/23, indicated that a facility owner shall pay in a timely manner bills incurred in the operation of a facility that are not in dispute and that are for services without which the residents' health and safety are jeopardized. Review of vendor submitted communication dated 2/27/24, indicated that the Ambulance Vendor was no longer providing services to the company, and was owed $20,534.10. During an interview on 3/1/24, at approximately 12:30 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility no longer utilizes the services of the Ambulance Vendor, and provided alternative transportation with another vendor and the use of the facility transport van. Review of the facility provided contractor report on 3/1/24, at approximately 2:00 p.m. revealed a balance of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-28 · tag F0836 — pattern
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility financial documents, interview with vendors and staff, it was determined that Corporate failed to pay bills in a timely manner for services without which the residents' health and safety are impacted for 20 of 71 residents (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, and R20). Findings include: 28 PA Code Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations subsection 201.14(g), dated July 1, 2023, revealed that a facility owner shall pay in a timely manner bills incurred in the operation of a facility that are not in dispute and that are for services without which the residents' health and safety are impacted. Request on 12/28/23, at 8:35 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) could not produce the facility's Accounts Payable log as all billing is handled by Corporate. The NHA reached out to corporate for the information. Review of facility's Aging Schedule as of 12/27/23, indicated Oxygen Supply Vendor V1 was owed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, grievances from July 2023, through November 2023, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with access to their personal funds/petty cash for two of three residents (Residents R10 and R11). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Trust Distribution of Funds last reviewed on 1/17/23, indicated that the facility will ensure timely distribution of petty cash and the amount available will be $45.00 per Medicaid resident, unless other funds are available. Unused funds will accumulate accordingly for resident use. During a review of two Grievances for Residents R10 and R11 documented by the Social Worker Employee E3 after the July 26, 2023, Resident Council meeting indicated that both residents had requested monies from the Business Office Manager (BOM) and were told they would have to wait and the amounts had to be requested and it was not available in the petty cash fund at the time. During an interview on 12/6/23, at 10:15 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator and the Regional Contracted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or their representative received written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of transfer for five of six residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident R8, R9, R23, R57, and R79). Findings Include: Review of federal regulation S483.15(d) Notice of Bed-Hold Policy, indicated, facilities must provide written information about these policies to residents prior to and upon transfer for such absences. This information must be provided to all facility residents, regardless of their payment source. These provisions require facilities to issue two notices related to bed-hold policies. The first notice could be given well in advance of any transfer, i.e., information provided in the admission packet. Reissuance of the first notice would be required if the bed-hold policy under the State plan or the facility's policy were to change. The second notice must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) accurately reflected the resident's status for two of six residents (Resident R50, and R65).Findings include:The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (periodic assessments of care needs), dated October 2025, indicated the following instructions:Intent: The intent of the items in this section (Section O) is to identify any special treatments, procedures, and programs that the resident received or performed during the specified time periods.O0110: Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs. Facilities may code treatments, programs and procedures that the resident performed themselves independently or after set-up by facility staff. Do not code services that were provided solely in conjunction with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-01-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medical records on each resident are complete and accurately documented for of four of nine residents (R8, R18, R46, and R57).The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated October 2025, indicated that Section C: Cognitive Patterns, Question C0100 Should Brief Interview for Mental Status Be Conducted? (BIMS) should be coded as 0 if the resident is rarely/never understood, or it should be coded 1, and the BIMS assessment should be completed if the resident is at least sometimes understood. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions:13-15: cognitively intact8-12: moderately impaired0-7: severe impairment Review of Resident R8's previous BIMS assessments revealed the following:02/05/25: 1403/31/25: 1405/06/25: 1407/28/25: 1410/23/25: 15 Review of Resident R8's BIMS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$51,111 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $51,111 — penalty dated 2026-06-04
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-11 for 41 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a private-equity firm. That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • WC SOUTH HILLS HOLDINGS LLC — private equity · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest
  • KJA PINNACLE LLC — private equity · 25.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WC SOUTH HILLS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/01/2024
KJA PINNACLE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2024
GRINSPAN, ARYEHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2024
KORN, ELIIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2024
WIELGUS, GEDALIAHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2024
KORN, MIRIAMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/01/2024
GPH CANONSBURG LPOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
PLUMM, FELICIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
TRAPANOTTO, VINCENTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
WECARE HCC LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
ANDREWS, HEATHERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
FINN, NICHOLASIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
LINAM, KIMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
RASMUSSEN-JONES, HOLLYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
SCHWARTZ, ALANIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
BEVERLY ENTERPRISES - PENNSYLVANIA, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
BEVERLY HEALTH AND REHABILITIATION SERVICES, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
DRUMM INTERMEDIARY SUB CO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
DRUMM MERGER COOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
DRUMM MERGER CO SUB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
FILLMORE STRATEGIC INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
GEARY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
PA 3 SIX MASTER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
PEARL SENIOR CARE, LLC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
WASHINGTON STATE INVESTMENT BOARDOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-19.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 2%Other / private 15%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$386per resident / day
operating cost
$11,723per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$322per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395289. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next