Forest Park Nursing And Rehabilitation
700 Walnut Bottom Road, Carlisle, PA 17013 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 114 certified beds · (717) 960-7700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (109) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $161,919 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-14)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.0% | 16.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.7% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.2% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.4% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.8% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.3% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.4% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 32.6% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 48.3% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 34.2% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.2% | 9.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.84 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.79 | 1.18 | 1.80 | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 140 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 97 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.5%CMS range 36.4–51.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.3–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 53.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 4.5–10.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 107.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
109 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 94 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect by failing to provide orientation and/or training to agency staff and failed to ensure agency staff responded to a medical emergency, which resulted in a delay in emergency services to a resident who went unresponsive (Resident 1). This failure placed a total of 48 residents in an immediate jeopardy situation who would require emergency intervention if found unresponsive (Residents 2-49). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Identifying Neglect, dated [DATE], revealed, 'Neglect' is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Any situation in which te resident's care needs are known (or should be known) by staff (based on assessment and care planning), and those needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility document review, hospital record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided after a change in condition for two of 11 residents reviewed (Residents 4 and 5). This failure resulted in continued decline of one resident (Resident 4), which required an emergency transfer to the hospital for low blood oxygen levels and difficulty breathing which contributed to cardiac arrest and resulted in death. This failure placed the residents residing on one of four units (Laurel Lane) in an immediate jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of the current facility policy, titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revealed the policy statement was, Our facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observations, facility document review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility displayed past non-compliance by failing to implement interventions, supervision, and effective safety measures to prevent elopement of a resident identified as being at risk for elopement and exhibiting exit seeking behaviors (Resident 1). Resident 1 was found lying in the parking lot of the facility and was medically compromised as evidenced by a low body temperature and abrasions. This failure placed a total of five residents in an Immediate Jeopardy situation who were identified as at risk for elopement and not on a locked unit (Residents 1, 6, 7, 9, and 10). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Wandering and Elopements, undated, read, in part; The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. If identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy reviews, clinical record reviews, facility documentation review, hospital records review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure wound care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1), which resulted in actual harm as evidenced by the need for surgical intervention for exposed hardware from a surgically repaired fracture for Resident 1.Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Surgery-Related (Pre- and Postoperative) Management- Clinical Protocol, revealed, in part, The staff and physician will monitor for, and address, postoperative risks and complications such as infection, deep vein thrombosis, cardiac arrhythmia, bleeding, failure of surgical wounds to heal, urosepsis from indwelling catheters inserted in the hospital, delirium, depression, etc. Review of Resident 1's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, review of select facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to ensure resident safety, which resulted in actual harm as evidenced by a frontal scalp laceration requiring sutures to repair for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hemiplegia (a severe form of paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 1's current physician orders revealed an order for a scoop mattress, effective February 4, 2025. Review of Resident 1's current care plan revealed a focus area related to Resident's self-care performance deficit due to physical limitations, hemiplegia, muscle weakness, abnormal posture, history of CVA (cerebrovascular accident or stroke), dementia, and malformation of the spine. Further review revealed an active intervention that the Resident is to transfer with a Hoyer lift and two-person assist; as well as an intervention that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three of four residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, and 3).Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included displaced malleolar fracture of right lower leg with healing, muscle weakness, and unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident 1's care plan focus for ADL (activities of daily living) self-care deficit related to physical limitations dated March 3, 2026. Interventions included, but were not limited to, toileting with assistance of two, dated March 3, 2026; squat pivot transfer with no weightbearing on right lower extremity with two assist, dated March 3, 2026, which was revised to transfer with one assist and slide board with no weightbearing on right lower extremity on March 11, 2026. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed a progress note dated March 11, 2026, at 3:27 PM, which indicated that she was found to have a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the right to receive written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room in the facility is changed for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 6).Findings include: Review of Resident 6's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD - a chronic condition where stomach acid frequently flows back into the esophagus). Observation conducted of Resident 6 on February 18, 2026, revealed the Resident was residing in the locked dementia unit. Interview conducted with Resident 6 on February 18, 2026, at approximately 1:00 PM, revealed the Resident did not give consent to move rooms and was not provided with a written notice of the room change. Interview conducted with Employee 4 (Social Worker) on February18, 2026, at 1:25 PM, revealed that staff reported to him Resident 6 was going to get his money and car, and was going to leave the facility, so…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for one of three resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 2).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown-Clinical Protocol, with a last revised date of April 2018, revealed, in part, The nurse shall describe and document/report the following full assessment of pressure sore including location, stage, length, width and depth, presence of exudates or necrotic tissue. Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included pressure induced deep tissue injury (DTI-pressure-related injury to subcutaneous tissues under intact skin) to left heel, stage 4 pressure ulcer (a pressure injury that is deep, reaching into muscle and bone and causing extensive damage) to sacrum, and paraplegia (paralysis of the lower body/legs). Review of Resident 2's current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents receive appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections in residents with a foley catheter for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 6).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Catheter Care, Urinary, with a last revision date of September 2014, revealed, in part, the step-by-step procedural instructions on how to perform catheter care, which included the following: Wash resident's genitalia and perineum thoroughly with soap and water. Rinse the area well and towel dry; using a clean washcloth with warm water and soap to cleanse and rinse the catheter from insertion site to approximately four inches outward. In addition, the policy indicated that the following information should be documented in the resident's medical record: date and time catheter care was given; name and title of individual giving the catheter care, and all assessment data obtained when giving catheter care. Review of Resident 6's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to meet the needs of the residents for three of three residents reviewed for the use of hipsters (Residents 1, 2, and 3).Findings include: Review of the clinical record for Resident 1 revealed clinical diagnoses that included depressive disorder (mood disorder causing persistent sadness and loss of interest affecting daily activities) and adjustment disorder (extreme emotional or behavioral reaction to a specific, identifiable stressor impacting daily functioning) and a history of falls. Review of Resident 1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (periodic assessment and care screening) dated December 18, 2025, revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 1's current physician orders revealed the order to encourage to wear hipsters every shift, document refusals with an effective date of November 3, 2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0917 — isolatedMake sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with private closet space for all 46 semi-private rooms within the facility.Findings include:Observation of semi-private room closets on January 5, 2026, revealed one closet in the room with roommates' clothing touching, and personal items on the shelf and floor were intermingled because there was no partition. A tour of the semi-private rooms revealed no partition in any of the closets.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on December 5, 2026, at 2:30 PM, the DON confirmed that none of the closets have a partition to provide private closet space for residents. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(2) Management
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice to ensure the resident's highest level of well-being for three of nine residents reviewed (Residents 7, 8 and 9). Findings Include:Review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). Review of Resident 7's TAR (Treatment Administration Record), dated November 2025, revealed the following orders: weekly body audit, every evening shift every Friday; cleanse left heel pressure wound with normal saline solution, apply betadine and leave open to air, every day and evening shift; catheter care every shift; enhanced barrier precautions due to Foley catheter every shift; monitor for signs and symptoms of a UTI (urinary tract infection) and notify physician of changes, every shift; and offloading heel boots at all times, every shift. Further review of Resident 7's TAR revealed that on November 21, 2025, there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-21 · tag F0839 — patternEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, employee record reviews, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed an active nurse aid certification for one of eight employee files reviewed (Employee 8). Findings include:Review of the employee file for Employee 8 revealed a signed position description for a certified nursing assistant (CNA) with a date of hire listed as [DATE]. Further review of Employee 8's file revealed a document from Pennsylvania Department of Health Nurse Aide registry verification website, indicating the facility verified Employee 8's nurse aid certification on [DATE]. Review of the aforementioned document revealed Employee 8's Nurse Aide certification had an expiration date of February 23, 2025. Additional review of Employee 8's filed failed to reveal an updated nurse aide registry verification. The Surveyor's review of the Pennsylvania Department of Health Nurse Aide registry verification website revealed Employee 8's Nurse Aide certification…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable, and home-like interior in two of three unit spas (Evergreen and Laurel Lane). Findings include: Interview with Resident 3 on June 25, 2025, at 12:30 PM, she stated the temperature in the bathroom in her room and the spa are is hot. Observation with Employee 1 on June 25, 2025, in the Laurel spa at 2:23 PM, revealed the ambient temperature registered 85.8 degrees Fahrenheit. Audible fan noise noted. Spa shower noted to be dry. Observation in the Evergreen spa at 2:38 PM, revealed the ambient temperature registered 85 degrees Fahrenheit. Audible fan noise noted. Spa shower noted to be dry. The surveyor discussed the concern of the temperature in the Laurel and Evergreen spa with the Nursing Home Administrator on June 25, 2025, a 2:45 PM. No further information was provided. 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(1)(3)(e)(2.1) Management
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, review of select facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse were reported in a timely manner for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 2). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating, dated April 2021, revealed If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law . 'Immediately' is defined as: a. within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or result in serious bodily injury; or b. within 24 hours of an allegation that does not involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. Review of facility policy, titled Resident-to-Resident Altercations, dated December 2016, revealed All altercations, including those that may represent resident-to-resident abuse, shall be investigated and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 94 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and environment that enhances each resident's dignity for six of 23 Residents reviewed (Residents 6, 7, 34, 42, 57, and 68). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Dignity, with a last review date of February 3, 2025, revealed, in part, 5. When assisting with care, residents are supported in exercising their rights. For example, residents are e. provided with a dignified dining experience; 10. Staff protect confidential clinical information. Examples include the following: b. Signs indicating the resident's clinical status or care needs are not openly posted in the resident's room unless specifically requested by the resident or family member. Discreet posting of important clinical information for safety reasons is permissible (e.g., taped to the inside of the closet door); and 12. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, observation, facility document review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards for four of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 5, 64, 68, and 88). Findings include: Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included vascular dementia (disease process in which damage to the blood vessels of the brain causes decreased contact with reality and decreased ability to perform activities of daily living) and congestive heart failure (decreased ability of the heart to pump blood through the body). Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed that on April 30, 2024, Resident 5 had a consultative gastrointestinal appointment for signs of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the consultation report revealed the recommendations stated, Call with update in [two] weeks if [swallowing] no better Barium swallow next. Continue soft diet, thin liquids. Recommends dentures - see dentist. Review of the consultation sheet revealed it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor the resident's nutritional status for one of seven residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 72). Findings include: Review of Resident 72's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypotension (low blood pressure) and atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat). Review of Resident 72's clinical record revealed a full nutrition assessment/weight change completed by the dietitian on September 13, 2024, at 10:16 PM, which read, in part, that Resident 72 triggers for significant undesired weight loss of 25% in one month and will order weekly weights for four weeks for weight monitoring. Will monitor weight trends. Review of Resident 72's September 2024 MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed an order for Weights; weekly weights for 4 weeks, for weight monitoring for four administrations, with a start date of September 14, 2024. Further review of Resident 72's September 2024 MAR revealed that no weights were obtained per the order above on September 14 and 28,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor possible side effects and target behaviors for two of five residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications (Residents 68 and 80). Findings include: Review of Resident 68's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included depression, anxiety, and cerebral infarction (a stroke-damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply). Review of Resident 68's physician orders revealed an order for lorazepam tablet 0.5 milligrams give one tablet via PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy-a flexible feeding tube placed through the abdominal wall and into the stomach which allows nutrition to be placed directly into the stomach) tube every 6 hours as needed for anxiety for 14 days, dated February 20, 2025. Review of Resident 68's Medication Administration Records (MARs) for February 2025 and March 2025 revealed that he had received four doses of his lorazepam: February 21, 2025, at 10:54 PM; March 3, 2025, at 11:53 AM and 9:21 PM; and March 6, 2025, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and three of three nourishment areas. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Food Receiving and Storage, last revised October 2023, read, in part, Food shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Dry foods that are stored in bins will be removed from original packaging, labeled and dated ('use by' date). All food items to be kept at 41 degrees Fahrenheit must be placed in the refrigerator located at the nurses station and labeled with a 'use by' date. Observation of the dry storage area on March 3, 2025, at 9:38 AM, revealed one bag of egg noodles open without an open date or use by date once opened; one bag of spiral pasta open without an open date or use by date once opened; 10 boxes of fudge round cookies not dated; and one box of potatoes that were all covered with sprouts and appeared to be old. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to establish and implement an antibiotic stewardship program to monitor the use of antibiotics. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Antibiotic Stewardship, last revised December 2016, revealed the policy statement was, Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. The policy's interpretation and implementation included, The purpose of our antibiotic stewardship program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in [the] residents. As of March 6, 2025, at 11:45 AM, the facility was unable to provide evidence that antibiotic stewardship was implemented via providing documentation including, but not limited to, tracking antibiotics used, duration of use, and monitoring culture and sensitivity of identified organisms to ensure prescribed antibiotic effectiveness. During a staff interview on March 6, 2025, at approximately 11:45 AM, Nursing Home Administrator revealed it was the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative of a resident's transfer, in writing, to include: the reason for the transfer or discharge, date of transfer, location of transfer, statement of the resident's appeal rights, name, and address (mailing and email) for two of four resident records reviewed for hospitalization (Residents 21 and 80). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Bed-Holds and Returns, last reviewed February 3, 2025, revealed, in part, 3. Prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and the resident representative that explain in detail: d. the details of the transfer (per the notice of transfer). Review of Resident 21's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease without heart failure (a long-term condition that develops over many years in people who have high blood pressure), chronic kidney disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or the resident's representative were provided the bed-hold notice upon transfer for two of four residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents 21 and 80). Finding include: Review of the facility policy, titled Bed-Holds and Returns, last reviewed February 3, 2025, revealed, in part, 3. Prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and the residents representatives that explains in detail: a. the rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed-holds; b. the reserve bed payment policy as indicated by the state plan (Medicaid resident); c. the facility per diem rate required to hold a bed (non-Medicaid resident), or to hold a bed beyond the state bed-hold period (Medicaid residents . Review of Resident 21's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease without heart failure (a long-term condition that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 64 and 72). Findings include: Review of Resident 64's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included contracture of muscle (a condition where muscles, tendons, joints, or other tissues tighten or shorten, causing deformity and loss of movement in the joint), functional quadriplegia (complete immobility due to severe disability or frailty caused by another medical condition, without physical injury or damage to the brain or spinal cord), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest in things). Review of Resident 64's clinical record revealed he has been on a turning and repositioning program since his admission on [DATE]; and the intervention has been noted to be a part of his pain management program since December 14, 2024. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 65 and 88). Findings Include: Review of Resident 65's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (a serious condition that occurs when the heart can't pump blood efficiently enough to meet the body's needs) and difficulty walking not elsewhere classified (a medical term used when someone has difficulty walking but the cause cannot be more precise). Observation of Resident 65 on March 3, 2025, at 11:22 AM, revealed Resident 65 lying in bed, and Resident 65's rolling walker was sitting beside the Resident's bed. Interview with Resident 65 at that time revealed that she is able to walk with the rolling walker. Review of Resident 65's care plan revealed a care plan with a focus area of, Requires assistance transferring from one position to anther related to unsteady gait, with a revision date of January 8, 2025. The care plan failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy reviews, product information review, observations, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for two of six residents observed during medication preparation and administration for (Residents 25 and 65) and for one of one resident observed for treatment administration (Resident 68). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Administering Medications, with a last review date of February 3, 2025, revealed,in part, 25. Staff follows established facility infection control procedures (e.g., handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc.) for the administration of medications, as applicable. Review of facility policy, titled Insulin Administration, with a last review date of February 3, 2025, revealed, in part, 5. The nursing staff will have access to specific instructions (from the manufacturer if appropriate) on all forms of insulin delivery system(s) prior to their use. Review of facility policy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to identify pressure ulcers and to promote healing and prevent infection of a pressure ulcer for one of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 68). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Dressings, Dry/Clean, with a last review date of February 3, 2025, revealed, in part, 15. Cleanse the wound with ordered cleanser. If using gauze, use clean gauze for each cleansing stroke. Clean from the least contaminated area to the most contaminated area (usually, from the center outward); 16. Use dry gauze to pat the wound dry; and 17. Apply the ordered dressing and secure with tape or bordered dressing per order. Review of Resident 68's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (a stroke-damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply), type 2 diabetes mellitus (disease that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care/oxygen services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one resident reviewed for oxygen use (Resident 57). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Oxygen Administration, with a last review date of February 3, 2025, revealed, in part, Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Review of Resident 57's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm characterized by rapid and irregular beating of the upper chamber of the heart), and cerebral infarction (a stroke-damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply). Observations of Resident 57 on March 3, 2025, at 11:01 AM, and March 4, 2025, at 11:00 AM, revealed that the Resident was receiving oxygen at 1 liter per minute via a nasal cannula. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of three residents reviewed for pain management (Resident 64). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Pain Assessment and Management, last reviewed February 3, 2025, read, in part, The purposes of this procedure are to help the staff identify pain in the resident, and to develop interventions that are consistent with the resident's goals and needs and that address the underlying causes of pain. Pain management is a multidisciplinary care process that includes the following: Developing and implementing approaches to pain management; identifying and using specific strategies for different levels and sources of pain; monitoring for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a risk benefit analysis and obtain consent for enabler bar use for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 56). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Bed Safety last reviewed February 3, 2025, revealed, 5. If side rails are used, there shall be an interdisciplinary assessment of the resident, consultation with the attending physician, and input form the resident and/or legal representative. 6. The staff shall obtain consent for the use of side rails from the resident or the resident's legal representative prior to their use. Review of Resident 56's clinical record revealed the diagnoses that included dementia (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning) and acquired absence of the right and left leg above the knee (absence of a limb that has been removed due to trauma, medical condition, or surgery). Observation of Resident 56's room on March…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to act upon the licensed pharmacist's report of a medication recommendation, and failed to provide a monthly medication regimen review for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, psychotropic medications, and medication regimen review (Resident 23). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Consultant Pharmacist Reports: Medication Regimen Review (Monthly Report), with a last review date of February 3, 2025, revealed, The consultant pharmacist reviews the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly; and Physician accepts and acts upon suggestion or rejects and provides and explanation for disagreeing. Review of Resident 23's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions characterized by excessive and persistent worry, fear, and nervousness that can significantly interfere with daily life) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 23's pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label and store prescribed medication or preventative creams in one of two treatment carts observed (Evergreen Way/Stepping Stones). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Storage of Medications, with a last review date of February 3, 2025, revealed, in part, 2. Drugs and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medications between containers; 3. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Review of facility policy, titled Pharmacy Services Policy and Procedure, with a last review dated of February 3, 2025, revealed, in part, Drugs and biologicals used in the facility shall be labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility document review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 4, 12, and 13). Findings include: During a resident interview on February 24, 2025, Resident 4 stated that he had not been receiving showers or baths twice a week as he is supposed to receive. Review of Resident 4's comprehensive plan of care revealed Resident 4 was care planned to receive limited assistance with bathing from staff. Review of Resident 4's Nurse Aide task documentation revealed that no shower/bathing documentation for January 29, 2025; February 12, 15, and 22, 2025. Review of the document revealed that the shower/bathing task for February 1, 2025, was marked as, Not applicable. During a resident interview on February 24, 2025, Resident 12 stated, No, when asked if she was receiving a shower or bath twice a week. Review of Resident 12's comprehensive plan of care revealed that Resident 12 required extensive assistance from staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to accurately acquire, receive, dispense, and administer drugs to meet the needs of each resident for four of four residents reviewed (Residents 1, 6, 7, and 8). Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (a stroke-damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply), history of liver transplant, and respiratory failure (long term condition in which the respiratory system is unable to adequately exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide in the body). Review of Resident 1's January 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that on January 31st, day shift, 15 medications (a total of 18 doses) were coded 9- see progress notes. Review of Resident 1's progress notes revealed two notes dated January 31, 2025, which indicated that the medications were unavailable and awaiting delivery from pharmacy. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility document review, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program for two of four unit hallways observed (Evergreen Way and Laurel Lane). Findings include: Upon entrance to the facility on February 24, 2025, at approximately 9:00 AM, it was observed that the facility had a posted sign that the facility was under infectious disease outbreak procedure and that masks were required within the facility. During an interview directly after entering the building, Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that visitors and staff should be wearing masks while in the building. During observations of the Laurel Lane unit on February 24, 2025, between approximately 9:30 AM, and 10:30 AM, it was observed that Employee 1 was not wearing a mask. During the observations, Employee 1 was observed entering multiple resident rooms providing medications to residents. During multiple observations on February 24, 2025, between approximately 9:30 AM and 2:20 PM, Employee 6 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provided for an indwelling urinary catheter for one of two residents reviewed for urinary catheter (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Catheter Care, Urinary, last revised September, 2014, revealed that subsection, Infection Control, stated, b. Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included type two diabetes mellitus (decreased ability of the body to utilize insulin for the transport of glucose into the cells for nourishment) and cerebral infarct (commonly known was stroke, sudden interruption of the blood flow to the brain leading to cell death). During multiple observations on February 24, 2025, between 10:13 AM and approximately 2:15 PM, it was observed, from the hallway, that Resident 1's foley catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to facilitate the removal of urine into a container)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, facility document and policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sufficient number of staff for the administration of medications for one of four units observed, which resulted in the missed or late administration of medications for four of 12 residents reviewed for medication administration (Residents 4, 5, 9, and 10). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Administering Medications, last revised April, 2019, revealed the policy statement was, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Review of the policy revealed it included, 3. Staffing schedules are arranged to ensure that medications are administered without unnecessary interruptions .4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame .5. Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convenience. Factors include: a. enhancing optimal therapeutic effect of the medication; b.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility document review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident record was complete and accurately documented for one of three residents reviewed for change in medical condition (Resident 14). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Change in Resident's Condition or Status, last revised February 2021, revealed subsection 8 stated, The nurse will record in the resident's medical record information relative to a change in the resident's medical/mental condition or status. Review of facility education provided to staff, dated December 5, 2024, with the topic of, Change in Residents Condition or Status, revealed the education included, Any changes in condition must be reported to [Registered Nurse] supervisor/Unit manager immediately so an assessment can be completed. When a change in condition has been identified a [user defined assessment form] must be completed. Review of Resident 14's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0920 — isolatedProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient space for residents to participate and observe an activity for one of one activity observed in the Florida Room lounge. Findings include: Observation on February 24, 2025, at approximately 10:35 AM, revealed that the morning activity of Bean Bag Toss was being held in the lounge outside of the Florida Room. There were 14 residents seated near one another at one end of room, and Resident 3 was noted to be sitting in the doorway to the room. There was also two activity staff present assisting with the activity. In addition to the activity that was occurring, there was a resident-use computer sitting on an overbed table where Resident 4 was observed sitting in his wheelchair using the computer. Subsequent observation of Resident 3 at approximately 10:54 AM, revealed Resident 3 was sitting in the hallway, and a separate resident was sitting in the door frame participating in the activity. During an interview with Resident 3, Resident 3 stated that she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, facility document review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control policies and procedures to help prevent the development and spread of a communicable disease for four of four units observed (Laurel Lane, Evergreen, Stepping Stone, and Dementia units). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Isolation - Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions, with a revision date of October 2018, revealed the policy statement was, Transmission-based precautions are initiated when a resident develops signs and symptoms of a transmissible infection; arrives for admission with symptoms of an infection; or has a laboratory confirmed infection; and is at risk of transmitting the infection to other residents. Review of the Policy Interpretation and Implementation subsection revealed it stated, .2. Transmission-based precautions are additional measures that protect staff, visitors and other residents from becoming infected. These measures are determined by the specific pathogen and how it is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in the multi-purpose room and four of four nursing units observed (Evergreen, Laurel Lane, Stepping Stones, and Chapelwood). Findings Include: Observation in the hallways on Laurel Lane, Evergreen, and Stepping Stones, on October 8, 2024, at 9:20 AM, revealed dried, dark spills on the floors throughout the hallways as well as miscellaneous debris on the floors. Observation of the hallway to the multi-purpose room on October 8, 2024, at 10:30 AM, revealed dark spots of dried liquid on the floor and a dead bug near the door to the courtyard. Observation of the multi-purpose room at this time revealed miscellaneous debris, including paper, food and dead bugs, on multiple places on the floor of the room. Observation of the Chapelwood unit on October 8, 2024, at 10:31 AM, revealed dark, dried spills on the hallway floor as well as miscellaneous debris on the floor. Additional observations of Evergreen, Laurel Lane,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included normal pressure hydrocephalus (rare condition that causes excess fluid in the brain and affects gait, cognition, and bladder control) and dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life). Review of nursing progress notes dated July 3, 2024, revealed Resident 4 returned from her neurology appointment at 1230 PM, with recommendations that included starting Rytary (used to treat symptoms of Parkinson's Disease such as muscle stiffness, tremors, spasms, and poor muscle control) three times per day, and starting Gabapentin (used to treat seizures, nerve pain and restless leg syndrome) three times per day. Further review revealed that the physician was notified and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain adequate personal hygiene and grooming of residents dependent on staff for assistance with these activities of daily living for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 3). Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included muscle weakness and history of falling. Review of Resident 1's current care plan revealed that he had a self-care deficit related to weakness and impaired mobility, and that he required assistance with bathing. During an interview with Resident 1 on July 29, 2024, at 10:30 AM, he revealed that he was supposed to receive two showers per week, but he was lucky if he received one per week. Review of shower documentation revealed that it was not documented that Resident 1 received a shower on July 1, 15 and 22, 2024. No refusals were noted on these dates. Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included muscle weakness and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility document review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide transportation services to maintain highest practical level of health and well-being for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include: Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease (disease process which results in decreased blood circulation to the extremities) and stage three chronic kidney disease (moderately impaired ability of the kidneys to filter toxins from the blood). Review of facility grievance form completed by Resident 5, dated July 8, 2024, revealed that Resident 5 submitted a grievance after the facility was unable to transport the Resident to a scheduled doctor appointment on July 2, 2024, and a scheduled surgical appointment on July 8, 2024. During a an interview with the DON on July 8, 2024, at approximately 11:10 AM, Resident 5 was scheduled to have pre-surgical vein mapping (non-invasive procedure in which ultra sound imaging is used to size, depth, and location…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the posting of nursing staffing data on a daily basis for two days reviewed (June 16 and 17, 2024). Findings include: During observation on June 17, 2024, at approximately 12:00 PM, it was revealed that the daily nurse staffing information posted was dated June 15, 2024. During a staff interview on June 17, 2024, at approximately 1:10 PM, the Director of Nursing revealed that the night shift Registered Nurse or the Human Resources employee is responsible for posting the daily nurse staffing information each day. At approximately 1:15 PM, Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the nurse staffing information that was posted was dated for June 15, 2024. 28 Pa code 201.18(b)(3) Management
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy review, select document review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the kitchen, in three of three nursing unit refrigerators, and one of two ice machines (Evergreen Way/Stepping Stones unit). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Food Receiving and Storage, with a last revised date of October 2017, revealed, in part: 1. Food services, or other designated staff, will maintain clean food storage areas at all times. 8. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled, and dated ('use by' date). 14. Food items and snacks kept on the nursing units must be maintained as indicated below: a. All food items .must be labeled with a 'use by' date. b. All foods belonging to a residents must be labeled with the resident's name, the item and the 'use by' date. e. Other opened containers must be dated and sealed or covered during storage. g. Medications .may not be stored in the same refrigerator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for one of three shower rooms observed (Laurel Lane) and two of four nursing units observed (Evergreen and Chapelwood). Findings Include: Observations of Resident 9's wheelchair on the Chapelwood unit on April 15, 2024, at 9:29 AM; April 17, 2024, at 8:12 AM; and April 17, 2024, at 10:02 AM, revealed that the base of her wheelchair had a moderate amount of dry dusty appearing debris, and the seat cushion had a small amount of dried food debris. Observation of Resident 15's room on the Chapelwood unit on April 15, 2024, at 9:03 AM, revealed the following: one of the closet doors was off track, leaning into closet and causing the other closet door to be pushed outward at the floor; there were missing slats from the window blinds lying on the floor; the Resident's wheelchair had food debris noted on the seat surface; the clear plastic chair rail along the wall, near the head of the bed, had a brown sticky…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide notice of transfer to the resident and/or resident representative, as well as a notice to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, after a transfer out of the facility for seven of 10 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents 4, 32, 35, 63, 71, 72, and 89). Findings include: Review of Resident 4's clinical record on April 16, 2024, at approximately 10:30 AM, revealed diagnoses that included hypothyroidism (condition of the thyroid gland that results in decreased production of thyroid hormones) and vascular dementia (progressive, irreversible degenerative disease of the brain that results in decreased reality awareness and decrease in capacity to perform activities of daily living). Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed that on October 1, 2023, Resident 4 was transferred to a hospital emergency room for concerns of chest pain. The Resident subsequently returned from the hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with a copy of the facility's bed-hold policy as a result of a transfer out of the facility for seven of 10 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents 4, 32, 35, 63, 71, 72, and 89). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Bed-Holds and Returns, last revised March 2022, read, in part, 1. All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident' bed during period of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). b. at the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours). Review of Resident 4's clinical record on April 16, 2024, at approximately 10:30 AM, revealed diagnoses that included hypothyroidism (condition of the thyroid gland that results in decreased production of thyroid hormones) and vascular dementia (progressive, irreversible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to submit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the required timeframe (14 days following completion) for 13 of 103 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3, 8, 14, 32, 33, 36, 56, 61, 66, 68, 86, and 97). Findings include: Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease and epilepsy (seizure disorder). Review of Resident 2's MDS assessments (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial needs), revealed her quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], was not completed until April 9, 2024, and was accepted on April 12, 2024. Review of Resident 3's annual assessment dated [DATE], revealed it was not completed until January 20, 2024, and was not accepted until January 23, 2024. Review of Resident 3's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed it was completed, but had not yet been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for four of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 32, 72, 89, and 407). Findings include: Review of Resident 32's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of colon (colon cancer) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). Review of nursing progress note dated April 1, 2024, revealed that Resident 32 was admitted to hospice (medical services, emotional support, and spiritual resources for people who are in the last stages of a terminal illness) on that date for malignant neoplasm of colon. Review of Resident 32's active care plan on April 17, 2024, failed to reveal any notation of hospice services. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on April 18, 2024, at 11:47 AM, she confirmed that Resident 32's care plan should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services are provided in accordance with professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for three of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 31, 32, and 73). Findings include: Review of Resident 31's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and chronic kidney disease (CKD - longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure). Further review of Resident 31's clinical record revealed a POLST form (Pennsylvania Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment), dated [DATE], stating that if Resident 31 was found with no pulse and not breathing, Resident 31 wishes to have CPR/Full Treatment (full resuscitative measures). Review of Resident 31's physician orders revealed an order dated [DATE], for DNR (Do Not Resuscitate), meaning no CPR would be provided if Resident 31 was found without a pulse and not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement fall interventions for three of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 31, 35, and 72). Findings Include: Review of Resident 31's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure), muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and repeated falls. Review of Resident 31's current fall care plan revealed an intervention, in part, dated November 20, 2023, for a scoop mattress (a mattress with edges that are built higher than the center to help keep a resident from rolling off) to be placed on bed for fall safety. Observations of Resident 31 in their bed on April 15, 2024, at 9:16 AM; April 16, 2024, at 9:52 AM; and April 17, 2024, at 8:25 AM; all failed to reveal the presence of scoop mattress on their bed. Observation was shared with Employee 2 on April 17, 2024, at 8:30 AM. She indicated that she would follow-up on the noted concern. Observation on Resident 31's room on April 17, 2024, at 12:10 PM, revealed that they were out of bed, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents receive appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections in residents with a foley catheter for one of one Residents reviewed (Resident 31). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Catheter Care, Urinary, with a last revision date of September 14, 2014, revealed, in part: The urinary drainage bag must be held or positioned lower than the bladder at all times to prevent the urine in the tubing and drainage bag from flowing back into the urinary bladder . be sure the tubing and catheter bag are kept off of the floor. The policy indicated step-by-step procedural instructions on how to perform catheter care, which included the following: cleansing of the genital and perineum with soap and water and rinsing well; using a clean washcloth with warm water and soap to cleanse and rinse the catheter from insertion site to approximately four inches outward; and that the following information should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0699 — patternProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 80). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Trauma Informed Care, revised March 2019, revealed, Purpose: To guide staff in appropriate and compassion care specific to individuals who have experienced trauma. Review of Resident 80's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event. The condition may last months or years, with triggers that can bring back memories of the trauma, accompanied by intense emotional and physical reactions) and depression (a group of conditions associated with the elevation or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed at least annually and that in-service education was provided based on the outcome of these reviews for five of five nurse aides reviewed (Employees 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9). Findings Include: Review of select facility documentation revealed that Employee 5 was hired in 2015; Employee 6 was hired in 2022; Employee 7 was hired in 2018; Employee 8 was hired in 2009; and Employee 9 was hired in 2008. Review of facility-provided employee performance evaluations for Employees 5, 7, 8, and 9 revealed: one was completed on February 20, 2019, for Employee 5; one was completed on July 28, 2019, for Employee 7; one was completed in December 2021 for Employee 8; and one was completed on March 23, 2023, for Employee 9. No performance evaluation was provided for Employee 6. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on April 19, 2024, at 11:59 AM, she acknowledged that the nurse aide performance evaluations were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Medication Regimen Reviews were completed by a consultant pharmacist, responded to in a timely manner by the attending physician or prescriber, and that a rationale was provided for any declined recommendations for five of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 27, 32, 86, 89, and 407). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Regimen Reviews, revised May 2019, revealed, The consultant pharmacist reviews the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly .The attending physician documents in the medical record that the irregularity has been reviewed and what (if any) action was taken to address it. Review of Resident 27's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included diabetes (a group of endocrine diseases that cause high blood sugar levels) and major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure as needed antipsychotic drugs were evaluated and renewed every 14 days for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 86). Findings include: Review of Resident 86's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) with psychotic disturbance (loss of contact with reality) and depression (mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest). Review of Resident 86's current active physician orders revealed an order for ABH gel (combination medication consisting of Ativan [antianxiety medication], Benadryl [antihistamine], and Haldol [antipsychotic medication]) every four hours as needed for agitation, effective April 21, 2023, and no documented end date. Review of Resident 86's clinical record failed to reveal evidence that the order for ABH gel was reviewed for appropriateness after 14 days.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, test tray completion, review Resident Council Meeting minutes, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide beverages that are palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature for one of one meal observed on the Evergreen Way hall. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Food Preparation and Service, with a last revised date of April 2019, revealed, in part, the following: Food and nutrition services employees prepare and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. In section titled Food Preparation, Cooking and Holding Time/Temperatures, revealed 1. The 'danger zone' for food temperatures is between 41 degrees Fahrenheit and 135 degrees Fahrenheit. This temperature range promotes rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that cause foodborne illness. 2. Potentially hazardous foods include meats, poultry, seafood, cut melon, eggs, milk, yogurt, and cottage cheese. 3. The longer foods remain in the 'danger zone' the greater the risk for growth of harmful…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility document review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an accurate data collection system of infection surveillance from June 2023 through September 2023. Findings Include: Review of facility form, titled Monthly Infection Control Log (Line List), revealed data to be collected and documented each month include resident's name, room number, unit, type of infection, date of infection, culture, antibiotic resistant, classification, and isolation precautions. Review of the facility's completed Monthly Infection Control Log (Line List) failed to reveal that any documentation of infections occurred for June, July, August or September in 2023. On April 18, 2024, at 8:36 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator stated the facility was unable to locate any infection tracking for June, July, August or September in 2023. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a)(c) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa code 211.10(a) Resident care policies
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each nurse aide was provided required in-service training consisting of no less than 12 hours per year for five of five nurse aide employee records reviewed (Employees 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9). Findings Include: Review of select facility documentation revealed that Employee 5 was hired in 2015; Employee 6 was hired in 2022; Employee 7 was hired in 2018; Employee 8 was hired in 2009; and Employee 9 was hired in 2008. Review of training records provided by the facility failed to reveal evidence that Employees 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 received at least 12 hours of annual in-service training. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on April 18, 2024, at 11:59 AM, she acknowledged the concern with the aforementioned nurse aides not completing 12 hours of in-service training annually. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.20(a)(d) Staff development
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and environment that enhances each resident's dignity for two of 23 Residents reviewed (Residents 9 and 31). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Dignity, with a last revised date of February 2021, revealed, in part: 11. Staff promote, maintain, and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy .; and 12. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents; for example: a) helping the resident to keep urinary bags covered. Review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (a stroke - damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply), abnormal posture, and stiffness of left hand. Observation of Resident 9 on April 16, 2024, at 9:39 AM, revealed that she was sitting in her wheelchair in the unit common area at a table. Her shirt was slightly raised up, her pants were slightly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required notice to the resident or the resident's representative following the end of their Medicare coverage for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 60). Findings include: A Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form completed by the facility on April 18, 2024, revealed that Medicare coverage for Resident 60 began on November 1, 2023, and that her last covered day was November 16, 2023. The form indicated that the facility-initiated discontinuation from Medicare Part A coverage and that the Resident's benefit days were not exhausted. Further review of the form revealed that an Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN - a notice given to Medicare beneficiaries to convey that Medicare is not likely to provide coverage for a skilled service) was not provided to the Resident or her Representative at the time that Medicare Part A was discontinued. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on April…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin to rule out abuse, neglect, or mistreatment for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 72). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Forest Park Abuse Policy, with a review/revise date of April 24, 2018, revealed Injury of unknown source is defined as an injury that meets both of the following conditions: (1) The source of the injury was not observed by any person or the source of the injury could not be explained by the resident; and (2) The injury is suspicious because of: (a) the extent of the injury; or (b) the location of the injury (e.g., the injury is located in an area not generally vulnerable to trauma); or (c) the number of injuries observed at one particular point in time; or (d) the incidence of injuries over time. Review of Resident 72's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and unstageable left heel pressure ulcer (injury to skin and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive assessment was completed every 12 months, as required, for one of 103 residents (Resident 73). Findings include: Review of Resident 73's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and gout (a form of arthritis that causes severe pain, swelling, redness and tenderness in joints). Further review of Resident 73's clinical record revealed he had a comprehensive MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial needs) completed on March 9, 2023. Review of Resident 73's MDS assessments revealed that Resident 73's comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], has not yet been completed and was still in progress. Resident 73 has had no other comprehensive MDS assessments completed since March 9, 2023. On April 17, 2024, at 2:36 PM, the Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required timeframe for two of 103 residents (Residents 31 and 45). Findings include: Review of Resident 31's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and chronic kidney disease (CKD - longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure). Review of Resident 31's MDS assessments (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial needs), revealed that Resident 31 had a quarterly MDS scheduled for March 15, 2024. Further review of Resident 31's MDS assessments revealed that Resident 31's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], had four sections that had not yet been completed and was still in progress. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one of four residents reviewed for pressure injuries (Resident 60) and one of four residents reviewed for dementia care (Resident 86). Findings include: Review of Resident 60's clinical record on April 16, 2024, at approximately 10:20 AM, revealed diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus type 2 (decreased ability of the body to utilize insulin for the transport of glucose from the blood stream into the cells for nourishment) and stage III pressure injury (wound of the skin that extends through the layers of skin) of the sacral region. Review of Resident 60's clinical record revealed Resident 60 developed an unstageable pressure injury of the sacral region while a resident at the facility on November 16, 2023. Review of consultant wound physician's progress notes revealed the pressure ulcer remained unstageable until January 17, 2024, at which time the consultant wound physician assessed the pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain adequate personal hygiene and grooming of residents dependent on staff for assistance with these activities of daily living for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 9). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Activities of Daily Living, Supporting, with a last revised date of March 2018, revealed, in part: Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (a stroke - damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply), abnormal posture, and stiffness of left hand. Review of Resident 9's care plan revealed a focus for ADL (Activities of Daily Living - washing face, brushing teeth, personal hygiene) Self-care deficit related to CVA (stroke), weakness, impaired gait and mobility, with a date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services provided were consistent with professional standards of care for one of two residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 407). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Oxygen Administration, with a revision date of October 2010, revealed 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review of Resident 407's clinical record on April 18, 2024, at 10:57 AM, revealed diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (an alteration in consciousness caused due to brain dysfunction) and chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure (a condition in which the heart's left ventricle becomes stiff and unable to fill properly). During an interview on April 15, 2024, at 9:35 AM, with Resident 407, an observation was made of Resident 407 receiving supplemental oxygen via nasal canula at 2.5 liters (of oxygen) per minute. An additional observation was made on April 16, 2024, at 11:13 AM, of the oxygen tubing and nasal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provided food per resident preference for two of 24 residents observed (Residents 96 and 358). Findings include: During an interview with Resident 96 on April 15, 2024, at 10:44 AM, the Resident indicated that they only receive 1% milk and would prefer to have 2% or whole milk. The Resident further indicated that they had spoken to Employee 1 (Certified Dietary Manager) regarding their preference, and was told by Employee 1 that the facility can only get 1% from their supplier. During an interview with Resident 358 on April 15, 2024, at 10:46 AM, the Resident indicated that they only receive 1% milk and would prefer to have 2% or whole milk. The Resident also indicated that they had spoken to Employee 1 regarding their preference, and was told by Employee 1 that the facility can only get 1% from their supplier. During an interview with Employee 1 on April 18, 2024, at 9:47 AM, they indicated that there was a national shortage on paper milk cartons and that they can only get 1% in the individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adaptive feeding devices for two of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 9 and 35). Findings Include: Review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (a stroke - damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply), abnormal posture, and stiffness of left hand. Review of Resident 9's physician orders revealed a diet order that included a Kennedy cup with meals, dated February 4, 2024. Review of Resident 9's current care plan revealed a care plan focus for being at risk for altered nutrition with an intervention for Kennedy cup, with a revision date of May 27, 2021. Observation of Resident 9 at lunch on April 15, 2024, at 11:55 AM, revealed that a Kennedy cup was present on her meal tray, but was turned upside down with no beverage ever poured into the cup. She had three small plastic beverage cups, each containing a beverage. Observation of Resident 9 at breakfast on April 16, 2024, at 8:03 AM, revealed that a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all required staff persons were in attendance at quarterly Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) Committee meetings for one of four quarters reviewed (fourth quarter, October - December 2023). Findings include: A review of Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting sign-in sheets for the period of April 2023 through March 2024, failed to reveal that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), owner, board member, or other person in a leadership role was present at any of the meetings held in the fourth quarter of 2023. During an interview with the NHA on April 18, 2024, at 12:00 PM, she revealed that she was not able to locate any sign-in sheets that had all required members for that time period. 28 Pa. Code §201.18(e)(1)(2)(3) Management
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0660 — patternPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to reevaluate and update the discharge plan for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 4); and failed to develop an effective discharge plan for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included prostate cancer, legal blindness, abnormalities of gait (walking) and mobility (the ability to move or be moved freely and easily), aftercare of a fracture (a break) of the right femur (large bone located in the thigh area of the leg), and unspecified fall encounter. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged home on March 7, 2024. Review of Resident 1's progress notes revealed a note dated March 3, 2024, at 4:50 PM, written by the Social Worker that indicated Resident 1's Representative was contacted to discuss the discharge plan, and that they would work on HH [home health] nursing, PT [Physical Therapy]/OT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0661 — patternEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, reconciliation of medications, and post-discharge plan of care that indicated where the individual plans to reside, any arrangements that have been made for the resident's follow-up care, and any post-discharge medical and non-medical services for four of four residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Discharging the Resident, revealed the following, in part: 5. If the resident is being discharged home, ensure that resident and/or responsible party receive teaching and discharge instructions; and in section titled Documentation that The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. The date and time the discharge was made. 2. The name and title of the individual(s) who assisted in the discharge. 3. All assessment data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for residents transitioning to home by not making appropriate referrals for home care services for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 3); and failing to inform a resident of a change in their discharge plan for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings Include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included prostate cancer, legal blindness, abnormalities of gait (walking) and mobility (the ability to move or be moved freely and easily), aftercare of a fracture (a break) of the right femur (large bone located in the thigh area of the leg), and unspecified fall encounter. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged home on March 7, 2024. Review of Resident 1's progress notes revealed a note dated March 3,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services provide an accurate account for the obtaining of medications and disposition of medications during the discharge process for four of four residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Discarding and Destroying Medications, with a last revised date of April 2019, revealed 11. The medication disposition record will contain the following information: a. The resident's name; b. Date medication disposed; c. The name and strength of the medication; d. The name of the dispensing pharmacy; e. The quantity disposed; f. Method of disposition; g. Reason for disposition; and h. Signature of witnesses. 12. Completed medication disposition records shall be kept on file in the facility for at least two (2) years, or as mandated by state law governing the retention and storage of such records. Review of Resident 1's closed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure timely notification of the listed emergency contact person following a fall for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of Resident 1's closed clinical record revealed that diagnoses that included dementia (irreversible, progressive degenerative disease of the brain, resulting in loss of reality contact and functioning ability), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and a history of repeated falls. A review of the nursing notes dated February 10, 2024, revealed that Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall on February 10, 2024, at 5:00 AM, without injury. The staff documented they would notify the emergency contact later on the morning of February 10, 2024. Review of the fall investigation revealed that the Emergency Contact person was never notified until February 12, 2024, at 9:26 AM. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on March 25, 2024, at approximately 1:00 PM, the DON confirmed the delay in notification of the Emergency Contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately document information in the clinical record for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the facility policy, titled Charting and Documentation, last revised July 2017, stated under #3, Documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and accurate. A review of the closed clinical record for Resident 1 revealed diagnoses that included percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG- medical procedure in which a tube is passed into a person's stomach through the abdominal wall) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids). A review of Resident 1's physician orders dated February 2024, revealed Resident 1 was NPO (nothing by mouth). A review of nursing notes dated February 8, 9, 13, 16, and 17, 2024, revealed staff documented Resident 1 received a regular texture diet and PEG tube feedings. The NPO status was verified by the facility on March 25, 2024, with a review of a dietary system…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and chronic kidney disease (CKD - when the kidneys have become damaged over time [for at least 3 months] and have a hard time doing all of their important jobs). Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed a nurse's progress note dated May 10, 2023, at 4:41 PM, with the following note text: Dayshift nurse reports unable to locate resident's hearing aid. Asked staff to look for hearing aids. Social Services made aware. An observation of Resident 2 on March 6, 2024, at 10:53 AM, revealed Resident 2 was not wearing hearing aids at that time. During an interview with Employee 3 (Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN]) on March 6, 2024, at 10:55 AM, Employee 3 confirmed Resident 2 did not currently have hearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent infection for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 9). Findings include: Review of Resident 9's clinical record reveals diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (CKD - a gradual loss of kidney function occurs over a period of months to years) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed the following treatment orders: Treatment 1: Pressure ulcer sacrum, cleanse with NSS (normal sterile saline), apply Santyl and cover with alginate and bordered foam dressing once a day and as needed every evening shift for wound, with a start date of December 1, 2023, and a discharge date of January 6, 2024; Treatment 2: Pressure ulcer sacrum, apply ¼ strength Dakins wet to dry and cover with bordered foam dressing every evening shift for wound, with a start date of January 6, 2024, and a discharge date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to inspect Resident's personal medical equipment brought into the facility to ensure a safe and functional environment for one resident reviewed (Residents 1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Electrical Appliances, with a last revised date of January 2019, revealed, in part, the following: 1. Residents may not maintain any electrical appliances (i.e., heating irons, cooking utensils, etc.,) within their living area, unless approved, in writing, by the administrator, or his/her designee; 3. Should electrical appliances be permitted, each must be in good working order, free of frayed cords, and UL approved. Review of facility policy, titled Electrical Safety for Residents, with a last revised date of January 2011, revealed, in part, 2. Inspect electrical outlets, extension cords, power strips, and electrical devices as part of routine fire safety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards that met the resident need for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: Review of Resident 4's clinical record on January 3, 2024, at 1:00 PM, revealed a diagnosis of hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction (swelling of one or both kidneys because of excess fluid due to a backup of urine caused by a blockage of the urinary tract). Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed that Resident 4 had been scheduled for a surgical procedure on December 21, 2023. During an electronic communication on January 3, 2024, at 12:19 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that Resident 4's December 21, 2023, surgery was canceled on December 20, 2023, and rescheduled to January 11, 2024, due to the facility not receiving instruction nor a physician order to hold Resident 4's coumadin (anticoagulant/blood thinner) prior to the procedure. Review of Resident 4's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and home-like environment for six of 11 Residents reviewed (Residents 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9) and on three of three nursing units observed. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment, with a last revised date of October 2018, indicated: 3. Durable medical equipment (DME) must be cleaned and disinfected before reuse by another resident; and 4. Reusable resident-care equipment will be decontaminated and/or sterilized between residents according to manufacturer's instructions. Observation of Resident 3 on November 29, 2023, at 12:57 PM, revealed the presence of a visible dust build-up on the frame and wheel spokes of their wheelchair. Observation of Resident 4 on November 29, 2023, at 12:58 PM, revealed the presence of a visible dust build-up on the frame of their chair. Observation of Resident 5 on November 29, 2023, at 1:02 PM, revealed the presence of a visible dust build-up on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for four of 11 records reviewed (Residents 2, 6, 7, and 9). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, with a last revised date of December 2016, revealed 13. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. Review of facility policy, titled Goals and Objectives, Care Plans, with a last revised date of April 2009, revealed the following: 1. Care plan goals and objectives are defined as the desired outcome for a specific resident problem; 2. When goals and objectives are not achieved, the resident's clinical record will be documented as to why the results were not achieved and what new goals and objectives have been established. Care plans will be modified accordingly; and 4. Goals and objectives are entered on the resident's care plan so that all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided to meet resident need for one of one residents reviewed (Resident 9). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Dental Services, with a last revised date of December 2016, indicated the following: 10. If dentures are damaged or lost, residents will be referred for dental services within 3 days. If the referral is not made within 3 days, documentation will be provided regarding what is being done to ensure that the resident is able to eat and drink adequately while awaiting the dental services; and the reason for the delay. 11. All dental services provided are recorded in the resident's medical record. A copy of the resident's dental record is provided to any facility to which the resident is transferred. Review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, and marked by memory disorders, personality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the listed emergency contact person (Resident's Representative) of the transfer to the hospital for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the facility policy, titled Change in Resident's Condition or Status last revised February 2021, stated, A nurse will notify the residents representative when it is necessary to transfer a resident to the hospital. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included urinary tract infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys bladder or urethra) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a form of diabetes that is characterized by high blood sugar, insulin resistance, and relative lack of insulin). Review of a nurse's note dated June 22, 2023, revealed that Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital due to shortness of breath. There was no documentation in the clinical record that the Resident's Representative was notified of the transfer. During an an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident the right to formulate an advance directive and facilitate follow-up procedures to provide information to the resident or resident representative at an appropriate time for six of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 34, 38, 54, 97, 207, and 209). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Advance Directives, revised September 2022, revealed The resident has the right to formulate an advance directive, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment. 1. Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquires of the resident, his/her family members and/or his or he legal representative, about the existence of any written advance directives. 2. The resident or representative is provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, as well staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for four of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 38, 71, 73, and 99). Findings include: Review of Resident 38's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included gangrene (dead tissue caused by an infection or lack of blood flow), peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Review of Resident 38's current care plan revealed a care plan in place for pain related to left foot amputation site, sacral pressure areas, and MASD (moisture associated skin damage), with a revision date of May 5, 2022. Further review revealed a care plan, revised on March 16, 2023, for nutritional status related to recent surgery, pressure area on foot. Review of Resident 38's clinical record revealed no evidence that Resident 38 currently had any pressure areas. In an email correspondence from the Nursing Home Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for five of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 23, 68, 94, and 209). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Administering Medications, revised April 2019, revealed Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition including schizophrenia and mood disorder symptoms) and Bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). Observation of Resident 1, on April 24, 2023, at 10:14 AM, revealed that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy reviews, observations, clinical record reviews, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care/oxygen services consistent with professional standards of practice for four of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 20, 49, 58, and 359). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure - a machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while one sleeps) -BiPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure which is a type of ventilator used to treat sleep apnea) Support with revision date of March 2015 under section titled General Guidelines for Cleaning identified the following guidelines for routine cleaning: 5 Humidifier b. Clean humidifier weekly and air dry; and #7 Masks, Nasal pillows, and tubing should be clean daily by placing in warm soapy water and soaking/agitating for 5 minutes. Mild dish detergent should be used. Rinse with warm water and allow it to air dry between uses. Review of Resident 20's clinical record documented diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for three of three residents reviewed (Residents 23, 99, and 359). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Care of a Resident with with a revision date of September 2010, revealed: 2. Education and training of staff includes, specifically: a. the nature and clinical management of ESRD (including infection prevention and nutritional needs) and b. the type of assessment data that is to be gathered about the resident's condition on a daily or per shift basis; and 4. Agreements between this facility and the contracted ESRD facility include all aspects of how the resident ' s care will be managed, including: b. how information will be exchanged between the facilities. Review of Resident 23's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to complete a risk-benefit analysis and obtain consent for enabler bar use for three of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 30, 36, and 54). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Bed Rails with a last reviewed/revised date of October 24, 2022, revealed: Each resident will not have bed rails in use at the facility unless the IDT (interdisciplinary team) has completed a comprehensive assessment, use of alternative approaches have been unsuccessful, and informed consent is obtained. The facility must: 1. Have attempted with documentation of alternatives to bed rails and determined that these alternatives do not meet the resident's needs, the facility must assess the resident for the risks of entrapment and possible benefits of bed rails. 2. In addition, the resident assessment must include an evaluation of the alternatives to the use of a bed rail that were attempted and how these alternatives failed to meet the resident's assessed needs. 3. The facility must also assess the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician reviewed and responded to pharmacy review recommendations in a timely manner for four of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 53, 54, 79, and 94). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Regimen Reviews with last revised date of January 31, 2023, revealed the following: 1) The Consultant Pharmacist will perform a medication regimen review (MRR) for every resident in the facility. 2) Routine reviews will be done monthly. 5) The primary purpose of this review is to help the facility maintain each resident's highest practicable level of functioning by helping them utilize medications appropriately and prevent or minimize adverse consequences related to medication therapy to the extent possible. 8. The Consultant Pharmacist will provide a written report to physicians for each resident with an identified irregularity. If…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for five of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 53, 54, 79, 94, and 209). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, revised July 2022, revealed, Residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition. Antipsychotic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review .The attending physician and other staff will gather and document information to clarify a resident's behavior, mood, function, medical condition, specific symptoms, and risks to the resident and others .The attending physician will identify, evaluate and document, with input from other disciplines and consultants as needed, symptoms that may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, policy review, product manufacturer label, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food/beverages in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the kitchen, in two of three nourishment rooms, one of two ice rooms/areas, and the activity room. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Labeling and Dating, undated, indicated the following: 1) Receiving and Storing Food: When contents are removed from the master container (cardboard box), they must be dated (and labeled if needed) to ensure that items are used by the expiration date; Some frozen vegetables and pasta products are packed in unlabeled plastic bags, and must be labeled and dated; dating examples: using the year is desirable for dry goods (spices) and frozen foods that have a longer shelf life; 2) Storing Prepared Food: All prepared foods must be labeled and dated to ensure that all staff are aware of the contents of the package and when it must be used by; foods may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurately documented for two of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 29 and 38). Findings Include: Review of Resident 26's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, stroke, amputation of left leg below the knee (BKA), and amputation of right leg above the knee (AKA). Observation of Resident 26 on April 24, 2023, at 2:03 PM, revealed Resident 26 in the hallway, in his motorized wheelchair. Resident 26 was observed to have a seatbelt in place. Resident 26 was asked about the seatbelt and if he was able to release it. Resident 26 stated yes. Observation of Resident 26 on April 25, 2023, at 11:19 AM, revealed Resident 26 in the hallway, in his motorized wheelchair, with a seatbelt in place. Review of Resident 26's clinical record revealed no physician order for the seatbelt and no documentation of an assessment for the use of the seat belt to indicate whether Resident 26 could release the seat belt or of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the implementation of infection control processes and procedures regarding posted transmission-based precautions signage for a COVID-19 positive individual (Resident 207) and failed to maintain an accurate data collection system of infection surveillance from July 2022 through March 2023. Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Isolation - Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions, revised January 2012, revealed, Signs - the facility will implement a system to alert staff and visitors to the type of precaution the resident requires. Review of Resident 207's clinical record revealed diagnoses including COVID-19 (contagious viral infection) and congestive heart failure (weakness of the heart that leads to buildup of fluid in the lungs and surrounding body tissues). Review of Resident 207's current physician orders revealed an order for contact and droplet precautions: masks (N95), gloves, gown, and eye shield every shift,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-27 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility provided documentation, review of facility policy, and review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide accurate and timely documentation related to offering the COVID-19 vaccine and provide education regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine for five of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents 28, 59, 91, 93, and 97). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Vaccination of Residents, revised June 2022, revealed Each resident is offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized. Review of facility provided document, which lists Residents and their COVID-19 vaccination status, revealed that for Residents 28, 59, 91, 93, and 97, it was documented as no documentation/no history. Review of Resident 28's clinical record revealed Resident 28 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and environment that enhances each resident's dignity for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 71 and 79). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Dignity with a last revised dated of February 2021, revealed 12. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents: for example: a. helping the resident to keep urinary catheter bags covered. Review of Resident 71's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included benign prostatic hyperplasia (age associated prostate gland enlargement that can cause difficulty with urinating) and cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture). Review of Resident 71's current physician orders revealed an order for foley catheter 16 French with 30 cubic centimeter balloon (a flexible tube placed through the urethra to the bladder to drain urine) to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0575 — isolatedPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that informational postings located throughout the facility contained all pertinent state agency and resident advocacy contact information. Findings include: Observation of the informational postings on April 25 2023, at 11:06 AM, revealed the informational postings present throughout the facility did not contain the mailing and email addresses of the State Survey Agency, mailing and email addresses of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program, contact information (name, phone number, mailing and email addresses) for home and community-based service programs and for the protection and advocacy network agency, as well as contact information (name, phone number, mailing and email addresses) for the Medicaid Fraud Control unit. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on April 27, 2023, at 11:03 AM, she revealed that she was in the process of revising the postings. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(i) Resident rights
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and home-like environment for one of three shower rooms (Evergreen Way/ Stepping Stones). Findings include: During an interview with Resident 84, on April 24, 2023, at 11:16 AM, they voiced a concern that there was a black substance that oozes out of the drain when using the shower in the shower room. Observations of the Evergreen Way/ Stepping Stones shower room on April 25, 2023, at 10:53 AM, and April 26, 2023, at 1:14 PM, revealed a black liquid, sticky appearing substance at the drain in the shower room. The flooring directly near the drain felt soft and sunken when stepping on the area, which also increased the oozing of the black substance. On April 27, 2023, at 11:22 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing were made aware of the identified concern. Observation and interview with the NHA and Employee 8 (Housekeeping/Laundry Supervisor) on April 27, 2023, at 1:15 PM, revealed that they believe it is the glue oozing from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, review of facility incident reports, review of facility policy, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a timely and thorough investigation to rule out abuse, neglect, or mistreatment following unwitnessed falls for two of two residents reviewed for falls (Residents 78 and 209). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting, revised July 2017, revealed, All accidents and incidents involving residents .occuring on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the Administrator. 1. The Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse and/or the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of the accident or incident. 2. The following data, as applicable, shall be included on the Report of Incident /Accident form: .The circumstances surrounding the accident or incident .The name(s) of witnesses and their accounts of the accident or incident. Review of Resident 78's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for two of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 38 and 78). Findings Include: Review of Resident 38's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included gangrene (dead tissue caused by an infection or lack of blood flow), peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Review of Resident 38's quarterly MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial needs), dated March 16, 2023, revealed that in Section M, Resident 38 was coded as having one unstageable pressure ulcer. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on April 27, 2023, at 10:55 AM, she stated that Resident 38 had an a surgical site that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed for three of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 26, 54, and 79). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, with a last revised date of December 2016, revealed the following: 1) The interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person centered care plan for each resident; 8) g. incorporate identified problem areas; and 10) identifying problem areas and their causes, and developing interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the resident, are the endpoint of an interdisciplinary process. Review of Resident 26's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, stroke, amputation of left leg below the knee (BKA), and amputation of right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff and resident interviews and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to update a resident's discharge plan in the clinical record for one of 29 clinical records reviewed (Resident 23). Findings include: Review of Resident 23's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included: end stage renal disease (a condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis, leading to the need for long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant), atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), high blood pressure (the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), and congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should). Interview with Resident 23 on April 25, 2023, at 9:30 AM, revealed he has been in the Nursing Home Transitions program (NHT- program was created to help re-balance the long-term care system in Pennsylvania so that people in need of long-term services could receive them in the setting of their choice, including their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, test tray, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and beverage that are palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature for one of one meal observed on the Stepping Stones hallway. Findings include: Observation on April 27, 2023, at approximately 11:05 AM, revealed the tray cart was delivered to Stepping Stones hallway. A test tray was completed on April 27, 2023, on the Stepping Stones hallway utilizing the last tray waiting to be served. Test tray temperatures were taken by Employee 9 (Dietary Manager) at approximately 11:30 AM and revealed the following: Milk 52 degrees Fahrenheit, not palatable temperature (point of service temperature should be less than 41 degrees Fahrenheit; Coffee 121 degrees Fahrenheit, not palatable temperature (point of service temperature should be greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit); Juice 56 degrees Fahrenheit, not palatable temperature (point of service temperature should be less than 41 degrees Fahrenheit); Chocolate Mousse 59 degrees Fahrenheit, not palatable temperature (point of service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of regulations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an Infection Preventionist (IP) that completed an approved program for specialized training in infection prevention and control, prior to assuming the role of the IP. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regulation §483.80(b)(4) states, The facility must designate one or more individual(s) as the Infection Preventionist(s) (IP)(s) who are responsible for the facility's IPCP (Infection Prevention Control Program) that have completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. Review of the facility's IPCP revealed that the facility did not have an Infection Preventionist who completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), Director of Nursing (DON), and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on April 27, 2023, at 12:15 PM, the DON stated that she just completed the post-test for the required training this past weekend. She stated she was having difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess for eligibility and offer the pneumococcal and/or influenza vaccines to three of five residents reviewed (Residents 28, 91, and 93). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Influenza Vaccine, revised August 2016, revealed All residents and employees who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza. The facility shall provide pertinent information about the significant risks and benefits of vaccines to staff and residents (or residents' legal representatives). A resident's refusal of the vaccine and reason for refusal shall be documented on the Informed Consent for Influenza Vaccine and documented in the electronic health record. Review of facility polity, titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised October 2019, revealed All residents will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to post the required daily staffing in a prominent place for review by the residents and visitors. Findings include: An observation on February 24, 2025, at approximately 10:40 AM, revealed that the required posting of daily staffing was located on the upper left-hand corner of the fully opened door of the Human Resources Office. There were approximately four other postings noted, which were located beside and below the daily staffing posting. With the door being in a fully opened position, the location of the daily posting, and the location of the other posted documents, the daily staffing posting was not clearly visible in a prominent location for review by residents or visitors to see. During an immediate staff interview with Employee 3 (Human Resource Director) on February 24, 2025, at approximately 10:40 AM, Employee 3 indicated that this was not where the posting of daily staffing would normally be located, but because of facility renovations and newly painted walls, this was where it had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$161,919 in federal fines across 5 penalties.
- $66,593 — penalty dated 2025-02-14
- $84,789 — penalty dated 2024-12-06
- $2,823 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
- $2,470 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
- $5,244 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PA 3 OPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 06/01/2023 |
| PA 3 HOLDCO | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| BORNSTEIN, SHLOMO | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| ELKOUBY, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| FERZIGER, BENZION | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| FISHBANE, BENZION | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| MENDIOWITZ, CHAIM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| SENDEROVITS, ELIEZER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| STEINBERG, EPHRAIM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| TRESS, SHMUEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| FISHER YOHN, CARLA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/06/2023 |
| FP 700 PROPERTY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2023 |
| GUISTWITE, DARRYL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/23/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $354K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395270. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.