Thornwald Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 76.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.37 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.47 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-07-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, review of facility investigation documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents, which resulted in actual harm, as evidenced by a 10 cm (centimeter) x 8 cm x 1 cm laceration (a deep cut or tear in the skin) to the right leg, requiring 15 sutures (stitches), for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 1). Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, review of facility investigation documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents, which resulted in actual harm as evidenced by a 10 cm (centimeter) x 8 cm x 1 cm laceration (a deep cut or tear in the skin) to the right leg, requiring 15 stitches, for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include:Review of facility policy, titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for three of 18 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 12, and 14). Findings include: Review of policy titled Bed Entrapment Prevention Program, revised November 11, 2022, read, in part, monitoring of resident's health status that may affect the risk of bed entrapment will be done periodically (at least quarterly) to assess resident continued need for the device and document in the electronic medical record. Review of facility policy, titled Trauma Informed Care, revised October 2024, read, in part, trauma informed care shall be an integral part of a person-centered environment. This involves an interdisciplinary approach to care. Ensuring care and services are person-centered and reflect the resident's goal for care, while maximizing the resident's dignity, autonomy, privacy, socialization,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
  Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, personnel file review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were protected from the potential for abuse by failing to verify the standing of professional license prior to hire for two of five personnel files reviewed (Employees 3 and 4). Findings Include:Review of facility policy, titled Admin Freedom from Abuse Policy, read, in part: I. Screening A. To ensure resident safety, UCC Homes will not hire prospective employees with disciplinary action against their licenses or certification, which includes Individuals found guilty of abuse. Prospective employees will undergo screening within the allowable timeframes. The screening process shall include: Verification of active Licensure or Certification with the Department of State and the original display portion of licenses on file, if appliable. Verification of enrollment in Department of State registry, if applicable.Review of the personnel file for Employee 3 (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA]), revealed Employee 3's nursing assistant certification…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for one of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 10).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Wound Management Program Infection Prevention and Control, dated February 2018, revealed, in part, Any resident with a wound receives treatment and services consistent with the resident's goals of treatment. The goal for a resident with a wound is one of promoting healing and preventing infection unless their preference and medical condition necessitate palliative care as the primary focus. Our facility's commitment to the Wound Management Program is demonstrated by implementation of processes founded on accepted standards of practice, evidence clinical guidelines, and interdisciplinary involvement. Review of facility policy, titled Skin Integrity Program: Pressure Ulcer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct regular inspection of all bed rails/enabler bars as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for one of two residents reviewed with enabler bars (Resident 14). Findings include: Review of Resident 14's clinical record documented diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis or severe weakness affecting one side of the body). Observation in Resident 14's room on December 10, 2025, at 11:30 AM, revealed an enabler bar was on the right side of the bed. Resident 14's physician orders included a right-side enabler for bed mobility and increased independence, start date August 14, 2025. Review of Resident 14's enabler bar assessment and consent for use of the enabler bar were signed August 14, 2025. Review of maintenance record for Resident 14's enabler bar (safety measurements) was dated April 10, 2025. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on December 10, 2025, at 1:13 PM, it was revealed that assessment for use of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on personnel training file review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures by not completing annual abuse training for one of three personnel training records reviewed (Employee 2). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation of Residents and Misappropriate of Resident Property, dated February 9, 2023, revealed Employees, including those who work in the facility as consultants and volunteers will be educated upon hire during New Employee Orientation, Online Training Programs, and/or Information packets. Education will be provided annually and as needed; Covered individuals will receive training and education regarding the following: Identifying what constitutes abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriate of resident property; Prohibiting and preventing all forms of abuse, neglect, misappropriate of property and exploitation; Recognizing signs of abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriate of resident property; Reporting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, facility documentation review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse in a timely manner for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation of Residents and Misappropriate of Resident Property, dated February 9, 2023, revealed, in part, Any incident of abuse must be reported to the Executive Director/Designee; All reports of alleged abuse/neglect shall be immediately and thoroughly investigated. The immediate response shall consist of: Social Services/Designee to interview the resident and if possible, obtain a signed statement from the resident. Interview with the person(s) reporting the alleged abuse/neglect and obtain a signed statement, if possible. Interview and obtain signed statements, if possible, from any witness or individual who has knowledge of the alleged incident. If any allegation of physical abuse is made, the nurse shall examine the resident. Findings of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, review of facility reported incidents, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete thorough investigations of abuse allegations and, therefore, failed to protect the safety of a resident during abuse investigations for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation of Residents and Misappropriate of Resident Property, dated February 9, 2023, revealed, in part, All reports of alleged abuse/neglect shall be immediately and thoroughly investigated. The immediate response shall consist of: Social Services/Designee to interview the resident and if possible, obtain a signed statement from the resident. Interview with the person(s) reporting the alleged abuse/neglect and obtain a signed statement, if possible. Interview and obtain signed statements, if possible, from any witness or individual who has knowledge of the alleged incident. Upon notification that an employee is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents receive appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections in residents with a foley catheter for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 65 and 72). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Procedure: Guidelines For Prevention of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections, with a last review date of January 25, 2024, revealed that Special meatus [opening leading to the interior of the body] care with an indwelling urinary catheter is not required. Daily soap and water cleansing of the perineal area is an important part of the hygiene for all patients. Review of Resident 65's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included urinary retention (a condition where your bladder doesn't empty all the way or at all when you urinate) and use of an indwelling foley catheter (a tube placed and held in the bladder to drain urine). Review of Resident 65's nurse aide task documentation from October 1, 2024, through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 27). Findings include: Review of Resident 27's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (progressive and irreversible neurological disease that causes decreased control of the nervous system resulting in stiffness, slowing of movement, and uncontrolled bodily movements) and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 27's care plan revealed that the Resident had an impaired functional status and approaches/interventions included transfers: 1-person assist, stand pivot with a walker and to have right AFO (Ankle Foot Orthotic - braces support the ankle, keeping the toes aligned with the rest of the foot) on for transfers and when OOB [out of bed], OOB to pedal Broda chair (a tilt-in-space positioning chair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status and failed to notify the physician of a significant weight change for two of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 38 and 79). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Procedure: Weighing and Documenting Resident Weights, last reviewed January 25, 2024, read, in part, Unit coordinators review weights and transfer all weights to include any re-weights to resident medical records via Care Tracker. Dietitian will notify nursing via [NAME] of any significant weight loss or weight gain, as well as physician after reviewing the weight detail report in Care Tracker. If nurse aide reports a variance, weight must be done again in presence of a licensed staff on that shift. A weight variance is defined as any resident weighing greater than 120 pounds with a gain or loss of five pounds or more, or a resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,110 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-07-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 70 rows in the source record cover these 35 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $548K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA