Chambers Pointe Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 47.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.95 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.03 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.88 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-08-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2) resulting in a fall with a fracture.Findings include:The facility's abuse policy, dated February 20, 2025, revealed that the facility will not tolerate abuse and that facility staff must immediately report all such allegations to the Nursing Home Administrator/Abuse Coordinator.The facility's abuse policy, dated February 20, 2025,revealed that the facility provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Neglect means failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-11-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs of residents for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 1, 3), resulting in a fall with a head injury. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding assistive devices and equipment, dated September 14, 2023, indicated that devices and equipment that assisted with resident mobility, safety and independence were provided for residents, which included wheelchairs, walkers and canes. Recommendations for the use of devices and equipment were based on the comprehensive assessment and documented in the resident's plan of care. The facility's care plan policy, dated September 14, 2023, indicated that the comprehensive, person-centered care plan included measurable objectives and time frames, and described the services that were furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies, investigative reports, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to take precautions to prevent injury to a resident caused by not having foot rests on his wheelchair during transport for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), resulting in a fall with a head injury. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding assistive devices and equipment, dated September 14, 2023, indicated that devices and equipment that assisted with resident mobility, safety and independence were provided for residents, which included wheelchairs, walkers and canes. Recommendations for the use of devices and equipment were based on the comprehensive assessment and documented in the resident's plan of care. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated August 23, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with transfers, had limited range of motion to his upper extremities, used a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-25 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication (drugs that affect a person's mental state, emotions, and behavior) for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 42).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding the use of psychotropic medication, dated February 12, 2026, included that who use psychotropic drugs shall also receive non-pharmacological interventions to facilitate reduction or discontinuation of the psychotropic drugs. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated assessment of the resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 42 dated March 12, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia, and depression.Physician's orders for Resident 42 dated January 2, 2026, January 16, 2026, and January 28, 2026, February 14, 2026, February 24, 2026, February 26, 2026, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies, as well as observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food at appetizing temperatures.Findings include:The facility's policy regarding food temperatures, dated February 12, 2026, revealed that cold foods were to be served at a temperature between 33 to 50 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and hot foods were to be served at a temperature between 135 to 155 degrees (F). Interview with Resident 5 on March 23, 2026, at 12:20 p.m. revealed that the hot foods were often served not hot when he received them. The menu for the lunch meal on March 24, 2026, revealed that the meal consisted of a salmon fillet, stir fried rice, green beans, pickled beets with onions, and cheesecake. The temperatures of the food were taken prior to the meal service, and the salmon was 155 degrees (F), stir fried rice was 168 degrees (F), green beans were 165 degrees (F), and the pickled beets were 41 degrees (F).Observations of the lunch meal on the Dogwood unit on March 24, 2026, at 12:07 p.m. revealed that Homeworker 1 placed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety, by failing to properly label and date frozen foods on one of two units (Dogwood unit). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding food storage, dated February 12, 2026, revealed that all products were labeled and dated with the receiving date. All open items were to have an open date and resealed to prevent contamination.Observations in the reach-in freezer on the Dogwood unit on March 23, 2026, at 11:07 a.m. revealed that there were two half gallon containers of ice cream, Butter Pecan and Chocolate, that were open and not labeled with the date they were opened.Interview with Homemaker 2 on March 23, 2026, at that time confirmed that the half gallon containers of ice cream should have been dated when they were opened.Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator March 23, 2026, at 2:46 p.m. confirmed that the open containers of ice cream should have been dated when opened.28 Pa.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record reviews, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete air mattress safety assessments for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 21, 45) who utilized air mattresses. Findings include:The facility's policy regarding assistive devices and equipment, dated February 12, 2026, revealed the facility provides, maintains, trains, and supervises the use of assistive devices and equipment for residents.A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 21, dated February 13, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance from staff for daily care. The resident's current care plan, dated December 12, 2025, revealed that the resident had potential or actual impairment to skin integrity, with intervention of alternating air mattress to maintain intact skin. Observation on March 23, 2026, revealed that Resident 21 utilized an air mattress on her bed. Review of her clinical record revealed that there was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' chairs were clean for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 10). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 10, dated November 27, 2024, revealed that the resident was usually understood, could understand others, and had diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a group of non-progressive neurological disorders that affect movement, posture, and balance). Observations of Resident 10's power wheelchair on February 26, 2025, at 3:10 p.m. and on February 27, 2025, at 11:49 a.m. and 1:45 p.m., respectively, revealed that the resident's power wheelchair had a buildup of food and dust debris on the lower frames, as well as an accumulation of dust on the black motor/battery cover. Interview and observations with the Director of Housekeeping on February 27, 2025, at 1:45 p.m. confirmed that Resident 10's power wheelchair had a buildup of food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 17, 24). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides guidance and instructions for the completion of MDS assessments, dated October 2024, indicated that the intent of Section N was to record the number of days, during the seven-day assessment period, that any type of injection, insulin, and/or select medications were received by the resident. Section N0451K was to be coded if the resident received an anti-convulsant during the seven-day assessment period. Physician's orders for Resident 17, dated January 24, 2025, included orders for the resident to receive 300 mg Gabapentin (anti-convulsant) three times a day. Review of the January MAR revealed that the resident received Gabapentin during the assessment period. However, an admission MDS assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide effective pain management for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 17). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding pain management, dated February 20, 2025, indicated that the facility would ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. When pain medications were administered the facility would follow up monitoring the effectiveness. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 17, dated January 30, 2025, revealed that the resident was alert and oriented, received pain medication routinely and as needed, received an opioid (a controlled pain medication), and was receiving hospice services. Physician's orders for Resident 17, dated January 30, 2025, included orders for the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a therapeutic diet was provided as ordered by the physician for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding thickened liquids, dated April 11, 2024, indicated that the definition for thickened liquids are liquids where the consistency has been altered to facilitate safe, oral intake. They are ordered as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition, such as dysphagia (a medical term for difficulty swallowing) due to stroke, cancer, multiple sclerosis (a chronic disease of the central nervous system) or other neuromuscular disease. Thickened liquids are provided only when ordered by a physician/practitioner, or when ordered by a dietitian or speech-language pathologist who has been delegated to write diet orders, to the extent allowed by state law. The facility utilizes standard liquid categories. Category 0: Thin; Category 1: Slightly thick (naturally thick); Category 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of facility's policies and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items that were palatable and at proper temperatures. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding Food Handling Principles dated September 14, 2023, revealed that hot foods are to be served at 135-155 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Observations on March 12, 2024, at 10:52 a.m. revealed that the food was brought to the kitchenette and initial temperatures were taken. The pasta was 152.0 degrees F, the popcorn chicken was 143.0 degrees F, the shrimp was 173.0 degrees F, the mashed potatoes were 160.0 degrees F, the beets and carrots were 164.0 degrees F, the mechanical chicken was 163.0 degrees F, and the ground shrimp was 156.0 degrees F. The food was then placed in the steam table. The steam table pans containing the hot food were left uncovered throughout the lunch meal service. After serving lunch to the last resident in the dining room on March 12, 2024, at 12:26 p.m., temperatures for a test tray were obtained. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, by failing to ensure that dietary staff wore hair coverings that completely covered their hair during food handling and not storing food properly. Findings include: The facility's dietary policy regarding Use of Hair Restraints, dated September 14, 2023, revealed that staff were to wear a hat or hairnet to cover all visible hair. The facility's dietary policy regarding Food Storage, dated September 14, 2023, revealed that food is stored in a manner that prevents damage, spoilage, infestation, and bacterial contamination. Observations in the main kitchen on March 11, 2024, at 10:26 a.m. revealed that the Assistant Dietary Director was wearing a hair restraint and approximately three inches of her bangs were uncovered. Observations in the freezer on March 11 2024, at 10:26 a.m. revealed a tray containing 22…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,593 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $7,796 — penalty dated 2023-11-29
• $7,797 — penalty dated 2023-11-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA