Laurel Lakes Rehabilitation And Wellness Center
201 Franklin Farm Lane, Chambersburg, PA 17201 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 186 certified beds · (717) 264-2715 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $211,205 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-18)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.1% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.0% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.0% | 10.8% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.7% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.1% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.8% | 20.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.2% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.1% | 25.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.7% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.6% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 68.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.8% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.7% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.64 | 1.62 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.02 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
31.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 209 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 48.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 196 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 47% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 31.4%CMS range 24.1–37.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 9.9–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 39.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.9–9.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.84 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 186 beds and averages 177.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, hospital record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided after a change in condition for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure resulted in continued decline, which required hospitalization for septic shock (a widespread infection causing organ failure and dangerously low blood pressure) and death. This failure placed an additional 10 out of 20 residents reviewed who were identified as having a change in condition in an immediate jeopardy situation (Residents 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11). Findings include: The facility has a policy regarding change in condition, but does not have a specific policy or documented process for alert charting for residents that are initially assessed to have a change in condition. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Hypertension (above normal blood pressure), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a long-term condition in which the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility displayed past non-compliance in its failure to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for three of seven residents reviewed (Resident 1, 4, and 7), which resulted in actual harm as evidenced by a right elbow fracture and laceration for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings Include:Review of facility policy, titled Pharmscript Provider Pharmacy Requirements, last revised August 2020, read, in part, Procedures: 4. f. Providing routine and timely pharmacy service as contracted, as well as emergency pharmacy service 24 hours per day, seven days per week. New medication orders are available for administration on the next routine delivery, unless otherwise requested by facility staff. Medication will be delivered by the primary pharmacy or back-up pharmacy or are available from the emergency medication kit/back-up medication supply.Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice that meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for three of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 5, 13, and 135).Findings include: Review of Resident 5's clinical revealed diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high) and dementia (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning). Review of Resident 5's physician orders revealed orders for Toujeo Max SoloStar Subcutaneous Solution Pen injector 300 units/milliliter (Insulin Glargine) Inject 20 unit subcutaneously one time a day, dated April 24, 2026; and Novolog FlexPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen injector 100 units/milliliter (Insulin Aspart) Inject as per sliding scale: if 0 - 100 = 0 units; 101-110 = 4units ; 111- 400 = 8 units subcutaneously with meals.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, facility provided documentation review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care/oxygen services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 5).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled CPAP/BiPAP Support, with a revision date of February 2026, and a last review date of April 1, 2026, under section, titled General Guidelines for Cleaning, identified the following guidelines for routine cleaning: 4. Machine cleaning: Wipe machine with warm, soapy water, and rinse at least once a week and as needed. 5. Humidifier: b. Clean humidifier weekly and air dry; and 7. Masks, Nasal pillows, and tubing: Clean daily by placing in warm, soapy water. Rinse with warm water and allow it to air dry between uses. Place in plastic bag after drying. Review of Resident 5's clinical revealed that he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, review of select facility temperature logs, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to utilize equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Freezer and Cooler Monitoring Policy & Procedure last revised December 2025, read, in part, The ensure food safety, product integrity, and regulatory compliance, all refrigeration and freezing units must be properly monitored, maintained, and documented. Temperatures must be kept within safe ranges at all times to prevent spoilage and foodborne illness. Review of facility freezer log sheets revealed freezer temperatures must be maintained below 0 degrees Fahrenheit (F - unit of measure). Review of the November 2025 kitchen equipment temperature logs revealed Freezer #1 was documented as being above 0 degrees on November 1, 16-20, 22-25, and 27-29 in the AM; and November 2, 3, 9-12, 17, 24, and 27 in the PM. No corrective action or reason was noted. Review of the December 2025 kitchen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the RAI manual (Resident Assessment Instrument- A standardized guide used in nursing homes and long-term care facilities to assess residents health, functional status, and care needs), clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 78).Findings include: Review of RAI Manual guidance for section K revealed A therapeutic diet is a diet intervention prescribed by a physician or other authorized nonphysician practitioner that provides food or nutrients via oral, enteral, and parenteral routes as part of treatment of disease or clinical condition, to modify, eliminate, decrease, or increase, identified micro- and macro- nutrients in the diet. Review of Resident 78's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included unspecified protein calorie malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients the body needs to function and the nutrients it gets), adult failure to thrive (FTT- in adults is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice for two of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 78 and 139).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Consultant Pharmacist Services Provider Requirement with an effective date of August 2020, read, in part, The facility will ensure regular and reliable consultant pharmacist services are provided to residents. Working with facility staff on the development, implementation, evaluation, and revision of pharmaceutical services procedures and helping ensure that the procedures address the needs of the residents and reflect current standards of practice. Assisting in the identification and evaluation of medication-related issues. Including the prevention and reporting of medication errors. Review of Resident 78's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included unspecified protein calorie malnutrition (an imbalance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff implement transmission-based precautions to prevent the spread of infection for two of three residents observed (Residents 72 and 164).Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Isolation- Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions, revised October 2018, revealed in a section labeled, Contact Precautions, staff and visitors will wear gloves (clean, non-sterile) when entering the room and staff and visitors will wear a disposable gown upon entering the room and remove before leaving the room. Further review of this policy revealed that for residents requiring droplet precautions staff are expected to wear masks, gloves, gown, and goggles when entering the residents room. Review of Resident 72's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included shingles (a painful, blistering viral rash caused by the same virus that causes chickenpox) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV- are two species of Lentivirus that infect humans. Over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility documentation review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide comfortable temperatures on two of five nursing units (E and F) and failed to provide a clean homelike environment in one of 34 rooms observed (Resident 3). Findings include: Observation on July 28, 2025, the facility had two additional portable air conditioner (AC) units running in the main lobby and at the end of E and F nursing units. On July 29, 2025, between 10:00 AM and 11:00 AM, during the screening process with Residents 101, 141, 168, and 172, who share a room, the Residents stated that it was very warm in their room. The surveyor agreed that the temperature of the room felt very warm. Employee 10 (Director of Maintenance) was notified to obtain the temperature of the room, which was 83.6 degrees Fahrenheit (F). During an interview with Employee 10 on July 29, 2025, he stated that he would place a portable floor air conditioner in Residents' 101, 141, 168, and 172 room. Employee 10 was asked if the HVAC (Heating Ventilation Air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy review, clinical record reviews, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain adequate personal hygiene and grooming of residents dependent on staff for assistance with these activities of daily living for two of 34 residents reviewed (Residents 79 and 149).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, with a revised date of March 2018, and a last review date of June 20, 2025, revealed Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Review of Resident 79's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, need for assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement resident-directed care and treatment consistent with the resident's physician orders and plan of care for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 25).Findings include:Review of Resident 25's clinical record revealed she was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on April 21, 2025, with diagnoses that included elevation of levels of liver transaminase (indication of liver stress or injury) and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident 25's physician orders revealed an order for Atorvastatin Calcium Oral Tablet 10 MG (Atorvastatin Calcium) Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for hyperlipidemia please stop taking when your liver enzymes are close to normal, with a start date of April 21, 2025. Further review of Resident 25's physician orders failed to reveal any active orders for laboratory work. Review of Resident 25's hospital discharge summary documentation signed on April 21, 2025, revealed She was advised at discharge to stop taking her statin therapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical record reviews, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services consistent with professional standards of practice for two of two residents reviewed for dialysis (Residents 16 and 46). Findings include:Review of facility policy, titled Hemodialysis Catheters - Access and Care of, last reviewed June 20, 2025, read, in part, The nurse should document in the resident's medical record every shift as follows: 1. Location of catheter. 2. Condition of dressing (intervention if needed). 3. If dialysis was done during shift. 4. Any part of report from dialysis being given. 5. Observations post-dialysis.Review of Resident 16's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (condition in which kidneys cease functioning) and dependence on renal dialysis (treatment that removes extra fluid and waste products from the blood when the kidneys are not able to). Review of Resident 16's physician orders revealed an order to check dialysis access…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility temperature logs, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to utilize kitchen equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen.Findings include:Observation of the dish machine in the main kitchen on July 28, 2025, at 1:22 PM, revealed kitchen staff were washing dishes from lunch, and the wash temperature of the dish machine read 138 degrees Fahrenheit (F).During an interview with Employee 3 (Certified Dietary Manager) on July 28, 2025, at 1:23 PM, he revealed the dish machine should be running at a minimum wash temperature of 150 degrees F. The surveyor questioned if he could link a sanitizing solution to the machine for safe use at a lower temperature and if he could have maintenance staff service the machine. Employee 3 revealed he could link the sanitizer to the machine as well as contact maintenance staff. Observation of the dish machine in the main kitchen on July 29, 2025, at 1:21 PM, revealed kitchen staff were washing dishes from lunch, and the wash temperature of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, review of grievances, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care and services were provided in a manner that enhanced resident dignity for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 130). Findings include:Review of the facility policy, titled Dignity, with a last reviewed and revised date of February 2021, revealed, Each resident shall be cared for in a manner promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. Review of Resident 130's clinical record revealed diagnoses of morbid obesity (a body mass greater than 40) and acute respiratory failure (when lungs cannot adequately exchange gases, leading to insufficient oxygen in the blood). Interview with Resident 130 on August 28, 2025, at 1:15 PM, revealed that Resident 130 had filed a complaint in June 2025, with the facility after Employee 1 had helped Resident 130 clean up and used disposable paper towels to dry Resident 130 because she said that she didn't have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to convey resident's funds within 30 days, and a final accounting of those funds to the resident upon discharge for one of three resident closed records reviewed (Resident 179).Findings include: Clinical record review revealed Resident 179 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged from the facility on February 27, 2025, and did not return. Review of Resident 179's final billing statement revealed she had a credit of $638.00 that was issued in the form of a check on May 30, 2025.Interview with Employee 4 (Business Office Manager) on July 30, 2025, at 1:40 PM, revealed the transaction history report for Resident 179 indicated that she was issued a refund check on May 30, 2025, and that a third party billing system messed up transaction so she had to reverse it, but the process for issuing resident refunds typically would occur within 30 days. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on July 31, 2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, facility documentation review, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a timely response was provided to a resident following submission of a grievance for one of two residents reviewed for grievances (Resident 168).Findings include: Review of facility policy, Grievance Process Procedure, dated October 2021, revealed, Upon the completion of the facility investigation, the administrator will ensure that the investigation results and resolution steps are communicated to the individual who originally submitted the grievance, complaint and/or suggestion. Resolution of the concern is desired within five (5) working days from the date the concern was filed. Routine follow up on concerns that are outstanding will be completed through the morning meeting process. During an interview with Resident 168 on July 29, 2025, at 11:05 AM, she revealed that she submitted a grievance regarding food concerns about a month ago, but never heard a thing about it. Review of a grievance form dated July 4, 2025, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from mental abuse and neglect for two of 34 residents (Residents 21 and 54). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Abuse and Neglect- Clinical Protocol, revised March 2018, revealed, Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including the caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective or any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology. Review of Resident 21's clinical record revealed diagnoses of dementia (a decline in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Psychotropic Medication Use, dated July 2022, with a last review date of June 20, 2025, revealed the following: 1. A psychotropic medication is any mediation that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior. 2. Drugs in the following categories are considered psychotropic medications and are subject to prescribing, monitoring, and review requirements specific to psychotropic medications: a. Anti-psychotics; b. Anti-depressants; c. Anti-anxiety medications; and d. Hypnotics. 3. Residents, families and/or the representative are involved in the medication management process. Psychotropic medication management includes: a. indications for use; b. dose (including duplicate therapy); c. duration; d. adequate monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences; and e.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for three of 34 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 4, and 171). Findings include: Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (a stroke-damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply) affecting the right side and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 3's Medicare 5 Day MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental or psychosocial needs) with the assessment reference date (last day of the assessment period) of July 3, 2025, revealed in Section GG. Functional Abilities at Question GG0115. Functional Limitation in Range of Motion that she was coded as having no impairment in her upper extremities. During a staff interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for one of two residents reviewed for range of motion (Resident 46). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Restorative Nursing Services, with a last revision date of July 2017, and a last review date of June 20, 2025, indicated Residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. Review of Resident 46's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD-a type of progressive lung disease characterized by long term respiratory symptoms and airflow limitations), and chronic systolic congestive heart failure (a specific type of heart failure that occurs in the left ventricle and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, medication information review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that was free form unnecessary medications for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 4).Findings include: Review of diclofenac dosage guidelines in the Physician's Desk Reference (a comprehensive resource for drug information, providing healthcare professionals with trusted prescribing information and patient adherence resources) revealed the following: Diclofenac gel is only indicated for the relief of the pain of osteoarthritis of joints amenable to topical treatment such as the knees and hands. The gel was not evaluated for use on joints of the spine, hip, or shoulder with dosage guidelines of 4 g (4.5 inches) topically per knee, ankle, or foot joint 4 times daily (Max: 16 g/day per lower extremity joint) and/or 2 g (2.25 inches) topically per elbow, wrist, or hand joint 4 times daily (Max: 8 g/day per upper extremity joint). Do not exceed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility grievances, review of the menu, completion of one meal test tray, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide foods that are palatable and at an appetizing temperatures at one of one meal observed.Findings include:Review of facility grievance filed on January 9, 2025, read, in part, cold food.Review of facility grievance filed on January 24, 2025, read, in part, food is cold.Review of facility grievance filed on July 1, 2025, read, in part, food is served cold all the time.Review of facility grievance filed on July 4, 2025, read, in part, after waiting 20 minutes, lunch was served and the cheeseburger was cold.Interview with Resident 25 on July 28, 2025, at 11:43 AM, she revealed the temperature of the food is poor when it is served.Interview with Resident 124 on July 28, 2025, at 11:50 AM, she revealed the food is always cold. During a group interview on July 29, 2025, at 11:05 AM, Resident 60 stated that food is always cold by the time it is served at the end of her hallway. Resident 168 revealed she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of select facility documentation, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received food that accommodated their preferences for two of two residents reviewed for meal accuracy (Residents 102 and 104).Findings include:During an interview with Resident 104 on July 29, 2025, at 11:05 AM, he revealed that he frequently does not receive the meal he has selected.Review of the lunch menu for July 29, 2025, revealed the main entree was honey dijon chicken, and the alternate entree was a salmon patty.Observation of Resident 102 on July 29, 2025, at 12:10 PM, revealed he was eating his lunch in his room, and he was scraping the sauce off of his chicken. During an immediate interview with Resident 102, he revealed that he did not receive what he had requested for lunch, and that he did not like what he was served.At the time of the observation, Resident 146, Resident 102's roommate, stated that he had put a timely request in the book for himself and Resident 102 to receive the alternate entree…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, closed clinical record, resident account statement and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to convey resident account balance in accordance with State law and closed accounts upon discharge in a timely manner for one of 2 closed resident records, Resident 12. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Account Receivable Refunds, last revised May 5, 2023, states, Credit balances to be refunded after researching for validity. Private pay credit balances/overpayment are to be refunded within 30 days. The facility confirmed that on May 17, 2024, complainant paid on the Resident 12's account to cover May 1, 2024, through May 31, 2024. Review of the closed clinical record for Resident 12, revealed resident was dischaarged from the facility on May 24, 2024. Complainant states that she has contacted the facility several times to request a refund, without success of receiving the refund. Review of Resident 12's account indicated that the complainant should have received a refund in the amount of $2,424.00 (two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for four of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 17, 100, 117, and 131). Findings include: Review of Resident 17's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (DM- a form of diabetes that is characterized by high blood sugar, insulin resistance, and relative lack of insulin) and atrial fibrillation (irregular and rapid heartbeat). A review of Resident 17's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental or psychosocial needs) with the assessment reference date of June 29, 2024, revealed in Section P. Restraints and Alarms, that Resident 17 was coded to use a restraint less than daily. Resident has a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) of 15, indicating she is cognitively intact. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for four of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 45, 88, and 131). Findings include: Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included heart failure (condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review Resident 3's current physician orders revealed no orders for weights. Review of Resident 3's care plan revealed a focus for at nutritional risk with an intervention for weights as ordered dated January 31, 2024, and an intervention for weekly weights on Monday mornings, with a revision date of August 6, 2024. Review of Resident 3's weight records on August 21, 2024, revealed that their last weight was documented as being obtained on August 8, 2024. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) on August 22, 2024, at 11:21 AM, the NHA indicated that Resident 3's weekly weights were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for three of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 11, 117, and 326). Findings Include: Review of Resident 11's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD-condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis), muscle weakness, and obstructive sleep apnea (a sleep-related breathing disorder that causes repeated disruptions in breathing during sleep). Review of Resident 11's physician orders revealed an order for Dialysis Precautions: No blood draws/ injections/ blood pressure from right arm. Emergency kit at bedside containing appropriate equipment, with a start date of July 4, 2024. Review of Resident 11's clinical record revealed she has been receiving hemodialysis (a treatment to filter wastes and water from your blood when your kidneys are not working well) since her original admission to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed ensure failed to ensure effects and side effects of psychotropic medications was being monitored for three of five residents reviewed (Resident 67, 100, and 131). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Antipsychotic Medication Use, revised July 2022, revealed, The staff will observe, document, and report to the attending physician information regarding the effectiveness of any interventions, including antipsychotic medications and Nursing staff shall monitor for and report . side effects and adverse consequences of antipsychotic medications to the attending physician. Review of Resident 67's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included psychotic disorder (a condition that causes people to lose touch with reality) and depression (major loss of interest in pleasurable activities, characterized by change in sleep patterns, appetite and or daily routine). Review of Resident 67's physician's orders dated August 20, 2024, revealed a current order for Seroquel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of select facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to utilize equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the dish machine on August 19, 2024, at 9:50 AM, revealed the wash cycle temperature was reading 132 degrees Fahrenheit (degrees F- unit of measure), below the minimum standard for safety of 150 F. Return observation of the dish machine during lunchtime on August 19, 2024, at 1:11 PM, revealed the wash cycle temperature was reading 125 F and the dishes that came out of the cycle still had food particles on them. Employee 5 (Dietary Employee) took the rack of dishes and returned them to the front of the dish machine to be rewashed. Interview with Employee 4 (Dietary Manager) on August 19, 2024, at 1:26 PM, revealed when the dish machine is not functioning properly, the process is to move to paper products or use the three-compartment sink to wash dishes, and that he does have a work order in for the dish machine.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a data collection system of surveillance for three of 12 months reviewed (October 2023; November 2023; and December 2023). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Surveillance for Infections, last reviewed January 19, 2024, revealed the facility will maintain a monthly line list of residents with infections for trending and outbreak potential to include the following data; identifying information i.e., name, age, room number, unit, and attending physician; admission date, date of onset, symptoms if known, and date of positive diagnostic test; site; pathogen and invasive procedures or risk factors (i.e., surgery, indwelling tubes, fractured hip, malnutrition, altered mental status). During an interview with the Employee 3 (Infection Control Preventionist [ICP]) on August 20, 2024, at approximately 11:00 AM, the ICP revealed the facility was unable to find any data collection system of surveillance from the previous full health survey through June of 2024. The ICP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident needs were accommodated regarding call bell accessibility for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Answering the call light, last revised September 2022, read, in part, The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs. Ensure that the call light is accessible to the resident when in bed, from the toilet, from the shower or bathing facility and from the floor. Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included left above the knee amputation (AKA- removing the leg from the body), muscle weakness, and seizure disorder (a condition where brain cells malfunction and send electrical signals uncontrollably) Observation in Resident 4's room on August 20, 2024, at 9:34 AM, revealed her call bell was out of reach, wrapped up around her left enabler bar. During an interview with Resident 4 on August 20,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, state regulation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS - standardized assessment tool utilized to identify a resident's physical, mental and psychosocial needs) for one of two residents reviewed for Hospice (Resident 23). Findings include: Review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Resident Assessment Instrument Version 3.0 Manual (instructions for completing the resident Minimum Data Set assessment) revealed instructions in Chapter 2 that included the direction of, An [Significant Change Minimum Data Set] is required to be preformed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in hospice program . Review of Resident 23's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (irreversible, progressive degenerative disease of the brain the results in decreased contact with reality and decreased ability to perform activities of daily living) and diabetes mellitus type II (decreased ability of the body to utilize insulin for the transport of glucose from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring of fluid restrictions for two of eight residents reviewed for nutrition/hydration needs (Residents 3 and 117). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Encouraging and Restricting Fluids, with a last revised date of October 2010, indicated in section titled General Guidelines to 1. Follow specific instructions concerning fluid intake or restrictions; and in section titled Reporting to 1. Notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the procedure and 2. Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included heart failure (condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 3's physician orders revealed an order for 1800 cc (cubic centimeters) fluid restriction in 24-hour period, with an original order date of January…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, policy review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to document completely and accurately on the clinical records for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the facility policy, titled Charting and Documentation, last revised July 2017, revealed the medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team. Review of the clinical record for Resident 1 on July 29, 2024, revealed diagnoses that included congestive obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-disease process that causes decreased ability of the lungs to perform) and anemia (a reduction in red blood cells). Observation of Resident 1 on July 29, 2024, at 1:00 PM, revealed the Resident resting in his bed. The Resident had no complaints regarding his care and services. On July 17, 2024, Resident 1 left the faciity on a leave of absence (LOA). Resident's family member signed Resident 1 out in the sign out log at the main desk, but entered the wrong date. Resident 1's niece confirmed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-02 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — patternProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a closed record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to assist the resident in obtaining and emergency dental services for one of 15 residents reviewed (Resident 13). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Emergency Dental Care, last reviewed April 2007, stated emergency dental care is available on a 24 hour basis. Emergency dental services include services to treat broken, or otherwise damaged teeth. Review of Resident 13's closed clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged to home on February 8, 2024. A review of the closed clinical record nursing note dated September 22, 2023, statesd, lower dentures broken. Resident stated last night staff was cleaning them and accidentally dropped dentures on to the floor causing them to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment was completed for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 8). Findings include: A review of Resident 8's clinical record on April 1, 2024, revealed diagnoses that included Paraplegia (the inability to voluntarily move the lower parts of the body) and Atrial Fibrillation (irregular and rapid heartbeat). A review of Resident 8's usual weight range prior to January 1, 2024, was documented as 168.3 to 172.0 pounds. A review of the clinical record for Resident 8 on April 1, 2024, revealed Resident 8 had a significant weight loss of 15 % in February 2024. Resident 8's weight on January 1, 2024, was 168.3 pounds, and on February 7, 2024, weighed 143.0 pounds. Resident 8 was diagnosed with a stage 2 pressure ulcer (ulcer involving loss of the top layers of the skin) on February 21, 2024. Resident 8 was weighed again on March 4, 2024, and weighed 134 pounds, an additional 9-pound weight loss. A review of the clinical record on April 1, 2024, revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, policy review, and facility investigation, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent potential accidents/hazards for controlled substances for one nursing unit (B Wing) and a wandering resident (Resident 11). Findings include: A review of the facility policy, titled Controlled Substances, last revised April 2019, Line 4, stated, Access to controlled medications remains locked at all times; and Line 12, C. stated, Any discrepancies in the controlled substance count are documented and reported to the Director of Nursing immediately. A review of the event investigation dated March 25, 2024, revealed that Employee 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse) delivered and reconciled with Employee 2 (Licensed Practical Nurse) a card containing 30 tablets, 15 milligrams each tablet, of morphine (a non-synthetic narcotic with a high potential abuse and is derived from opium and is used for the treatment of pain). The delivery of the medication occurred on March 24, 2024, at approximately 7:30 PM. Based on Employee 2's statement, the medication bag was placed on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility investigation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow procedures to secure controlled medications on one of five nursing units (B Wing). Finding include: A review of the facility policy on April 2, 2024, titled, Controlled Substances, last revised April 2019, stated that any discrepancies in the controlled substance count are documented and reported to the director of nursing (DON) services immediately; controlled substances are stored in the medication room in a locked container, separate from containers for any non-controlled medications; and the DON services investigates all discrepancies in controlled medication reconciliation to determine the cause and identify any responsible parties, and reports the findings to the administrator. A review of the facility's event investigation dated March 25, 2024, revealed that Employee 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse) was delivered and reconciled with Employee 2 (Licensed Practical Nurse) a card containing 30 tablets with 15 milligrams each of morphine (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to prevent the transmission of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) for one of 3 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, COVID-19 Infection Control Protocols to Minimize Exposure, with an annual review in 2023, For residents going to medical appointments, regular communication between the medical facility and the nursing home (in both directions) is essential to help identify residents with potential exposures or symptoms of COVID-19 before they enter the facility so that proper precautions can be implemented. Review of the closed clinical record on December 26, 2023, revealed Resident 1 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Further review of the closed clinical record on December revealed that Resident 1 attended dialysis on December 1,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$211,205 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $211,205 — penalty dated 2024-10-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROSENZWEIG, STEVEN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 98% | since 08/01/2019 |
| MANDEL, AVITAL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/01/2019 |
| HOLTRY, RANDY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395613. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.