Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Cheswick
3876 Saxonburg Boulevard, Cheswick, PA 15024 · For profit - Corporation · 121 certified beds · (412) 767-4998 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569, F0570)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (79) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $112,925 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-30)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.9% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.0% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.9% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 30.4% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.5% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.1% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.1% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 34.1% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 50.0% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 16.8% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.2% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.43 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.1%CMS range 37.5–65.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.0–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 16.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.72 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 112.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
79 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 66 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and documents, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to create an environment free of accidents when a visitor/former employee entered the facility with a loaded handgun and discharged the handgun on the Third Floor Nursing Unit. This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation for all residents.Findings include: Review of facility policy Accidents and Incidents dated 4/28/26, indicated all accidents and incidents occurring on our premises must be investigated and reported to the administrator. The charge nurse should conduct initial assessment and provide any emergency interventions. If necessary, call 911 (emergency services) for evaluation and possible transfer to Hospital/Medical Center. Review of facility policy Security dated 4/28/26, indicated the facility will provide security services as needed. In the absence of specific security staff, the Maintenance Department will be responsible for facility security. The following items are not permitted on facility property: all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to keep Resident R96 free from hazards and provide the necessary monitoring and supervision for a resident with known suicidal ideation and history of a suicide attempt for one of three residents (Resident R96). This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of facility policy Suicide Threats dated 11/24, indicated resident suicide threats must be taken seriously and immediately reported to the nurse supervisor charge nurse. A staff member must remain with the resident until the nurse supervisor/charge nurse arrives to examine the resident. The resident will be placed on 1:1 observation until the acute episode has been resolved if the resident is capable of self-injury. The resident shall remain on 1:1 monitoring until transfer from the facility for acute intervention or nursing assessment has identified the resident is no longer a safety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a trauma survivor with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization and failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan for a resident who was at risk for re-traumatization resulting in psychosocial harm for one of three residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Trauma Informed Care dated 4/28/26, indicated the facility will provide individualized and personalized care to the residents. Understanding and adapting care to those with known trauma is an important part of the care provided. This care will be personalized to each resident based on the situation and past experiences of each resident. This policy takes into consideration that events in one's past play an important role in current functioning. Individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate documentation for one of three residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Documentation dated 4/28/26, indicated the purpose is to communicate resident's status and provide accurate accounting of care and monitoring provided. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/1/26, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, chronic pain, and personal history of traumatic brain injury (a disruption in the normal function of the brain). Review of a nursing progress note dated 5/3/26, stated, Resident was in the hallway when an active shooter fired a gun. He was whisked away to safety. He had a skin assessment done. No bruises, no shots fired at him. Called a family member to inform of his safety.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Communication training to five of five direct care facility staff reviewed (Employees E11, E13, E14, E15 and E16).Findings include: During an interview on 5/8/26, at 3:33 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated that education is conducted by calendar year running January through December, and State Agency requested Employee Education records for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E11, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E13, NA Employee E14, NA Employee E15, and Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E6. During an interview on 5/8/26, at 4:17 p.m. the NHA stated that the facility was unable to find any education records for the above employees for the year 2025. During an interview on 5/8/26, at 4:55 p.m. Human Resources Director Employee E17 confirmed that the facility failed to provide Communication training to five of five direct care facility staff. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee28 Pa. Code: 201.20(a) Staff Development
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Resident Rights training to five of five direct care facility staff reviewed (Employees E11, E13, E14, E15 and E16).Findings include: During an interview on 5/8/26, at 3:33 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated that education is conducted by calendar year running January through December, and State Agency requested Employee Education records for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E11, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E13, NA Employee E14, NA Employee E15, and Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E6. During an interview on 5/8/26, at 4:17 p.m. the NHA stated that the facility was unable to find any education records for the above employees for the year 2025. During an interview on 5/8/26, at 4:55 p.m. Human Resources Director Employee E17 confirmed that the facility failed to provide Resident Rights training to five of five direct care facility staff. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee28 Pa. Code: 201.20(a) Staff Development
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation training to five of five direct care facility staff reviewed (Employees E11, E13, E14, E15 and E16).Findings include: During an interview on 5/8/26, at 3:33 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated that education is conducted by calendar year running January through December, and State Agency requested Employee Education records for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E11, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E13, NA Employee E14, NA Employee E15, and Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E6. During an interview on 5/8/26, at 4:17 p.m. the NHA stated that the facility was unable to find any education records for the above employees for the year 2025. During an interview on 5/8/26, at 4:55 p.m. Human Resources Director Employee E17 confirmed that the facility failed to provide Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation training to five of five direct care facility staff. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee28 Pa. Code: 201.20(a) Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) training to four of five direct care facility staff reviewed (Employees E11, E13, E14, and E16).Findings include: During an interview on 5/8/26, at 3:33 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated that education is conducted by calendar year running January through December, and State Agency requested Employee Education records for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E11, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E13, NA Employee E14, NA Employee E15, and Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E6. During an interview on 5/8/26, at 4:17 p.m. the NHA stated that the facility was unable to find any education records for Employees E11, E13, E14, and E16 for the year 2025. During an interview on 5/8/26, at 4:55 p.m. Human Resources Director Employee E17 confirmed that the facility failed to provide QAPI training to four of five direct care facility staff. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee28 Pa. Code: 201.20(a) Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Infection Control training to five of five direct care facility staff reviewed (Employees E11, E13, E14, E15 and E16).Findings include: During an interview on 5/8/26, at 3:33 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated that education is conducted by calendar year running January through December, and State Agency requested Employee Education records for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E11, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E13, NA Employee E14, NA Employee E15, and Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E6. During an interview on 5/8/26, at 4:17 p.m. the NHA stated that the facility was unable to find any education records for the above employees for the year 2025. During an interview on 5/8/26, at 4:55 p.m. Human Resources Director Employee E17 confirmed that the facility failed to provide Infection Control training to five of five direct care facility staff. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee28 Pa. Code: 201.20(a) Staff Development
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Compliance and Ethics training to five of five direct care facility staff reviewed (Employees E11, E13, E14, E15 and E16).Findings include: During an interview on 5/8/26, at 3:33 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated that education is conducted by calendar year running January through December, and State Agency requested Employee Education records for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E11, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E13, NA Employee E14, NA Employee E15, and Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E6. During an interview on 5/8/26, at 4:17 p.m. the NHA stated that the facility was unable to find any education records for the above employees for the year 2025. During an interview on 5/8/26, at 4:55 p.m. Human Resources Director Employee E17 confirmed that the facility failed to provide Compliance and Ethics training to five of five direct care facility staff. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee28 Pa. Code: 201.20(a) Staff Development
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all nurse aide staff received a minimum of twelve hours of in-service education training each year for three out of three Nurse Aide (NA) Employees (Employee E13, E14, and E15)Findings include: During an interview on 5/8/26, at 3:33 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated that education is conducted by calendar year running January through December, and State Agency requested Employee Education records for Nurse Aide (NA) Employees E13, E14, and E15. During an interview on 5/8/26, at 4:17 p.m. the NHA stated that the facility was unable to find any education records for Employees E13, E14, and E15 for the year 2025, and confirmed that the facility failed to provide the required 12 hours of annual in-service education for three out of three Nurse Aide Employees. 28 Pa. Code 201.19(7) Personnel policies and procedures28 Pa. Code 201.20(a)(d) Staff development
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Behavioral Health training to five of five direct care facility staff reviewed (Employees E11, E13, E14, E15 and E16).Findings include: During an interview on 5/8/26, at 3:33 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated that education is conducted by calendar year running January through December, and State Agency requested Employee Education records for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E11, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E13, NA Employee E14, NA Employee E15, and Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E6. During an interview on 5/8/26, at 4:17 p.m. the NHA stated that the facility was unable to find any education records for the above employees for the year 2025. During an interview on 5/8/26, at 4:55 p.m. Human Resources Director Employee E17 confirmed that the facility failed to provide Behavioral Health training to five of five direct care facility staff. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee28 Pa. Code: 201.20(a) Staff Development
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for one of three nursing unit shower rooms. (Second floor)Findings include:Review of facility policy Environmental Services, Clean, Safe and Orderly Environment dated 4/28/26, indicated the exterior and interior of the facility will be maintained in clean, safe and orderly manner. Housekeeping, Laundry and Maintenance services will provided properly with precautions taken to prevent infection and cross contamination. Observations on 5/7/26, at 1:30 p.m. revealed the second-floor shower room had 5 ceiling tiles that were brown and one ceiling tile that was brown and caving in. During an interview on 5/7/26, at 3:50 p.m. Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the second floor shower room ceiling tile and that she was not aware of its condition and unsafe environment. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a)Responsibility of licensee28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(e)(2.1) Management
Show the remaining 66 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and documents, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement policies and procedures to notify the administrator and local law enforcement in a timely manner after a visitor/former employee entered the facility with a loaded handgun and discharged the handgun on one of three nursing units (Third Floor Nursing Unit).Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse Protection dated 4/28/26, indicated our facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individual. Mandated staff training/orientation programs that include such topics as abuse prevention, identification and reporting of abuse, stress management, dealing with violent behavior or catastrophic reactions, etc.; training is provided as time of hire, annually and as needed. The reporting and filing of accurate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician order for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication & Treatment Orders dated 4/28/26, indicated each medication administered will have a corresponding and complete physician's order. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included fracture, left femur, atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm that originates in the heart's upper chambers) and malnutrition. Review of Resident R1s Medicare-5day MDS assessment (minimum data assessment)- periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/27/26, indicated the diagnosis remained current. Review of Resident R1's most recent physician orders indicate Sodium Chloride Injection Solution 0.9 % (Sodium Chloride) Use 60 ml/hr intravenously every shift for AKI, hydration for 1 day, ordered on 4/28/26. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of job descriptions, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to effectively manage the facility by failing to create a safe environment free of accidents when a visitor/former employee entered the facility with a loaded handgun and discharged the handgun on the Third Floor Nursing Unit, which created an immediate jeopardy situation for all residents.Findings include: The job description for the Nursing Home Administrator specified the primary purpose of the job position is to manage the Facility with current applicable federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern long-term care facilities To follow all facility policies and apply them uniformly to all employees. The ensure the highest degree of quality care is provided to our residents at all times. The job description for the Director of Nursing specified the purpose of the job is to plan, organize, develop and direct the overall operation of the Nursing Service Department in accordance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to keep residents free from hazards and provide the necessary monitoring and supervision for residents with known suicidal ideation and history of a suicide attempt for two of three residents (Resident R1, and R2).Findings include: Review of facility policy Suicide Threats dated 11/1/25, indicated resident suicide threats must be taken seriously and immediately reported to the nurse supervisor charge nurse. A staff member must remain with the resident until the nurse supervisor/charge nurse arrives to examine the resident. The resident will be placed on 1:1 observation until the acute episode has been resolved if the resident is capable of self-injury. The resident shall remain on 1:1 monitoring until transfer from the facility for acute intervention or nursing assessment has identified the resident is no longer a safety risk. The charge nurse or designees shall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to record food temperatures at the time of service in the main kitchen. Findings include: A review of the facility's food temperature log on 3/4/26, at 12:15 p.m. revealed that there was no documented evidence that the holding food temperatures were obtained at the time of of during service for breakfast and lunch to ensure that the food maintained safe internal temperatures. In an interview during this observation period, Dietary Manager Employee E7 stated confirmed that there were no recorded temperatures for breakfast or lunch and they should have been recorded. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a)Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions and/or goals to address the care needs of residents for two of four residents reviewed (Resident R2 and R3). Findings include: Review of the facility policy MDS/RAI/Care Planning last reviewed on 11/1/25, indicated the care planning process provides a tool for an interdisciplinary approach to the care of the residents. The care plan will be assessed at least quarterly and reviewed by the interdisciplinary team. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 1/21/26, indicated the diagnosis of diabetes (high sugar in the blood), anxiety and chronic pain. Review of Resident R2's physician orders dated 1/14/26, indicated Methadone (used to treat chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R5). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Flow of Care, dated 11/1/25, revealed care will be provided to residents, as needed 24-hour a day to attain and maintain the highest level of functioning. Clinical record review revealed Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include, fibromyalgia (chronic disorder that cause widespread pain, fatigue and other symptoms), adult failure to thrive and diabetes mellitus. Review of physician orders dated 1/2/26 indicated showers to be given evening shift on Tuesday and Fridays. Review of Resident R5's bathing records from January 2026 indicated resident received two bed baths, 1/6/26 and 1/16/26, missing six showers. Interview with the Director of Nursing on March 4, 2026, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to procure complete physician's orders for two of three residents who receive outside services (Resident R2 and R3)Findings include: Review of the facility policy Transfer to Appointment Outside the Facility last reviewed 11/1/25, indicated verify that a physician order for appointment/consult is present. Arrange for transportation as appropriate. Arrange for escort as appropriate. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 1/21/26, indicated the diagnosis of diabetes (high sugar in the blood), anxiety and chronic pain. Review of Resident R2's physician orders dated 1/14/26, indicated Methadone (used to treat chronic pain and opioid use disorder) HCl Oral Concentrate 10 milligrams/milliliter (MG/ML) give 8 ml by mouth two times a day for chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-31 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records and facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who displayed mental or psychosocial adjustment difficulties received appropriate treatment and services for one of three residents (Resident R96).Based on clinical records and facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who displayed mental or psychosocial adjustment difficulties received appropriate treatment and services for one of three residents (Resident R96).Findings include: Review of facility policy Suicide Threats dated 11/24, indicated resident suicide threats must be taken seriously and immediately reported to the nurse supervisor charge nurse. A staff member must remain with the resident until the nurse supervisor/charge nurse arrives to examine the resident. A behavioral health professional consult is indicated whenever the resident suggests suicide. Review of the clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-31 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, review of Quality Assurance attendance records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all the required committee members for one of four quarterly meetings (Quarter Three of 2025). Findings Include: The facility Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement policy dated 9/4/25, indicated the facility will conduct quality assurance/improvement and assessment committee meeting at least quarterly to identify areas of service that are non-complaint, or with potential for improvement. Review of Quality assurance and Performance Improvement sign in sheets and attendance records for Quarter Three of 2025, failed to reveal the Infection Preventionist, Director of Nursing, and Medical Director were in attendance. During an interview on 10/31/25, at 12:59 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all the required committee members for one of four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policies, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable environment for the residents in resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], Second floor dining room, and the Third floor dining room as required. (Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], Second floor dining room, and Third floor dining room) Findings include: A review of facility policy Environmental Services, Clean, safe and Orderly Environment dated 3/21/25, revealed that the exterior and the interior of the facility will be maintained in clean, safe and orderly manner. Housekeeping, Laundry, and Maintenance services will be provided properly with precaution taken to prevent infection and cross contamination. During an observation on 7/2/25, conducted from 12:30 p.m., through 1:00 p.m., revealed the following: - room [ROOM NUMBER]'s air conditioning unit had a build-up of grime, and black debris on the air inlet grill and internal area immediately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate a thorough investigation for incident or accidents for two of six residents (Residents R1, R2). Findings include: The facility Accident and Incident-Investigating and Reporting policy dated 7/1/24, indicated all accidents or incidents occurring on the premises must be investigated and reported to the administrator. Review of clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses which included anxiety, diabetes mellitus and bipolar disorder. A review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a periodic assessment of resident care needs), dated 3/5/25, indicated diagnoses remained current. Review of Resident R2 nurse progress notes dated 4/17/25 Resident R2 was reported that on 4/13/25, resident was observed in the basement near the kitchen. When interviewed Resident R2 (BIMS score 15/15) stated that she did go to the basement to seek kitchen staff regarding her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, Four week Spring Summer (SS) cycle menu diet extension sheets and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to review, date. approve, and follow a preplanned cycle menu (Four week Spring Summer cycle menu, lunch meal on 3/19/25) as required. Findings include: A review of facility Menu policy dated 8/5/24, revealed that standardized cycle menus are prepared by the corporate menu team and fulfill residents' nutritional and therapeutic needs. The faciliy Registered Dietician reviews and approves the menu. A review of the facility's Four Week Spring Summer Cycle Menu extension spreadsheets provided by the facility revealed that the menus failed to provide documented evidence that the facility's Registered Dietician (RD) reviewed, dated and approved the four week Spring Summer cycle menu. During an interview on 3/19/25, at 11:45 am Food Service Director Employee E5 confirmed that the facility implemented the four week Spring Summer cycle menu prior to his hiring in 11/24. During an observation of the lunch meal service on 3/19/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policies, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable environment for the residents in residnet room [ROOM NUMBER], First floor common area, and the elevator door on the second floor nursing unit as required. ( Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], First floor common area, elevator door second floor nursing unit) Findings include: A review of facility Resident Environment policy dated 7/1/24, revealed that the facility will maintain a safe, clean and comfortable homelike environment for the residents. During an observation on 3/19/25, it was revealed the following: * the door jam at the elevator door on the second floor nursing unit was missing on the right side side which exposed rough and unfinished plaster which created an unsafe environment for the residents, * there was torn and missing wall paper on the wall in the lounge area on the first floor * Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] contained peeling and chipping paint on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, manufacture instructions, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to follow manufacture instructions for the production of sugar free pudding on 3/19/25. (sugar free pudding) Findings include: A review of facility Standardize Recipes policy date 8/5/24, it was revealed that standardized recipes are used in the production of food products. During an interview on 3/19/25, at 10:30 am Food Service Worker Employee E3 confirmed that tray line service for the lunch meal begins at 11:00 am. She further confirmed that the production sheets indicated 33 servings of diet (sugar free) pudding was needed for the lunch meal service. During an observation on 3/19/25, at 10:30 am it was revealed that the facility failed to prepare 33 serving of diet (sugar free) pudding needed for the lunch meal service. During an observation on 3/19/25, at 10:35 am Food Service Worker Employee E2 was observed preparing diet (sugar free) pudding by pouring two quarts of 2% milk onto a mixing bowl and adding two packets of sugar free…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, observations, resident tray cards, menu diet extension sheets, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide the approved dessert for 23 of 23 residents prescribed a Mechanical Soft diet and nine out of nine resident prescribed a puree diet for the lunch meal service on 3/19/25. Findings include: A review of facility Menu policy dated 8/5/24, revealed that standardized cycle menus are prepared by the corporate menu team and fulfill residents' nutritional and therapeutic needs. The faciliy Registered Dietician reviews and approves the menu. A review of facility Description of Standard Diets policy date 8/5/24, revealed that a mechanical diet is used when a resident has difficulty chewing and or swallowing. A puree diet is used for residents that have difficulty chewing or swallowing, the food consistency is pureed. During a review of the resident's tray cards for the lunch meal on 3/19/25, it was revealed that for dessert the resident prescribed a mechanical soft diet were to receive a mechanical soft lemon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medical records on each resident are complete and accurately documented for three of seven residents (Resident R1. R2 and R3). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 1/29/25, indicated diagnoses of alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, chronic kidney disease and hepatic encephalopathy(condition where the brain becomes impaired due to severe liver disease). Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed social services did not do an initial admission assessment. Review of Resident R2's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility 1/29/25. A review of Resident R2's MDS dated [DATE], included diagnoses of orthopedic aftercare, absence of left leg below knee and alcohol-induced chronic pancreatitis. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-07 · tag F0570 — widespreadAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, documents and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to secure a surety bond on behalf of the residents of the facility that assured the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility for three months 11/24, 12/24, and 1/25 as required. (11/24, 12/24, and 1/25) Finding include: A review of facility Surety Bond policy dated 7/1/24, indicated that a surety bond is purchased on behalf of the residents by the facility to protect the financial security of resident's funds deposited in a resident trust account. The facility evaluates the value of the bond annually to make certain that sufficient coverage is maintained. A review of the facility's Resident Trust Surety Bond effective 11/1/24, revealed that the bond's value at $193,915.84, A review of the Facillity Trial Balance (a document providing evidence of each resident's current balance held by the facility) date 1/7/25, indicated the value of funds held by the facility at $252,107.96 During an interview on 1/7/25, at 1:00 pm the Nursing Home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-07 · tag F0826 — patternProvide specialized rehabilitative services by qualified personnel, when ordered for a resident by a doctor.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Speech Therapist who provided care to residents was licensed as a Speech Therapist for three of 12 months (November, and December 2024, and January 2025) Findings include: Review of Title 49 Chapter 45 indicated that Speech Therapists on a provisional license shall practice only under supervision of a supervisor who holds the same type of license as the provisional licensee, who is physically present in the area or unit where the provisional licensee is practicing. During an interview on 1/7/25, at 11:09 a.m. Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) Employee E2 confirmed that she has a provisional speech therapist license, as she is required to complete nine months of a fellowship before she will be issued a regular license. SLP Employee E2 stated that she had been supervised by a licensed SLP on a daily basis, however this stopped on 11/10/24 when the licensed SLP terminated her employment at the facility. Since 11/10/24, SLP Employee E2 has been working without daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable, and homelike environment by maintaining an acceptable temperature range throughout resident areas for 32 resident rooms on three of three units (First, Second, and Third Floor). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Resident Environment dated 7/1/24, indicated the facility will provide an environment that is safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike. A homelike environment de-emphasizes the institutional character of the setting. Review of the facility policy Temperature Extremes dated 7/1/24, indicated the facility is to provide comfortable and safe temperature levels. The temperature throughout the facility shall be maintained at between 70 degrees and 82 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations 483.10(i)(6) Comfortable and safe temperature levels. Facilities initially certified after October 1, 1990, must maintain a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly maintain kitchen equipment in a sanitary condition creating the potential for cross contamination in the main kitchen of the facility. Findings include: A review of facility policy Sanitation dated 7/1/24, indicated the food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. All equipment shall be kept clean, maintained in good repair and shall be free from breaks, corrosions, open seams, cracks, and chipped areas. During an observation on 11/4/24, at 9:50 a.m., of the walk-in cooler in the main kitchen, conducted with Food Service Director (FSD) Employee E3, revealed that the cold air condenser fan covers had a build-up of dust, grime, and dark colored debris. FSD Employee E3 confirmed observation by surveyor when viewed. During an interview on 11/4/24, at 9:55 a.m., FSD Employee E3 confirmed that the facility failed to properly maintain kitchen equipment, walk-in cooler, in a sanitary condition creating the potential for cross contamination in the main…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0622 — patternNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for four out of five residents sampled with facility-initiated transfer (Residents R41, R58, R69, R70). Findings include: Review of Resident R41's admission record indicated she was originally admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included neurocognitive disorder with muscle weakness, high blood pressure, and insomnia (difficulty falling or staying asleep). Review of Resident R41's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on 9/28/24, and returned to the facility on 9/29/24. Review of Resident R41's clinical record revealed no documented evidence that the facility had communicated specific information to the receiving health care provider for the residents transferred and expected to return, which included the resident's care plan goals, advanced directive information,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) for three of five resident hospital transfers (Resident R58, R69, R70). Findings include: Review of Resident R58's admission record indicated she was originally admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included neurocognitive disorder with anxiety, high blood pressure, and dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life.) Review of Resident R58's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on 9/23/24, and returned to the facility on 9/28/24. Review of Resident R58's clinical record failed to include documented evidence that the resident or the resident's representative were provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0699 — patternProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a trauma survivor with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for five of five residents (Resident R41, R43, R44, R59, and R77). Findings include: Review of facility policy Trauma Informed Care dated 7/1/24, indicated the facility will provide individualized and personalized care to the residents. Upon admission, screening for trauma will occur by the social worker. This information will be provided to the interdisciplinary team as needed, for care, treatment, and diagnosis. When information about past trauma becomes available the interdisciplinary team will incorporate this information into the resident's care. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE]. Review of the facility's Social Service History assessment dated [DATE], failed to assess…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to obtain a physician order for hospice services and to ensure the coordination of hospice services (supportive services for end stage terminal illness) with facility services to meet the needs of each resident for end-of-life care for three of three residents (Resident R18, R38, and R76). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Hospice Care dated 7/1/24, indicated all hospice assessments, plan of care, progress notes and services provided will be maintained on the medical record and integrated with the facility plan of care. Nursing staff will ensure there is a current physician's order, physician progress note regarding Hospice care, Hospice documentation is current and available on the medical record. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R18 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R18's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated the diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policies, clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were ordered and implemented for four of four residents (Resident R26, R41, R44, and R65). Findings include: Review of facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 7/1/24, indicated enhanced barrier precautions require the use of gown and gloves only for high-contact resident care activities. High contact resident care activities include device care or use of urinary catheter. It was indicated an enhanced barrier precaution sign is displayed near the entrance of the room or the facility has another system to communicate may be utilized to alert staff of the enhanced barrier precautions. PPE supplies will be available for use (gloves, gown) near the resident's room. A trash can will be placed near the exit of the resident room to dispose of gown and gloves. Review of Center for Disease (CDC) definition for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for two of three units (Second-floor, and Third-floor). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Environment dated 7/1/24, indicated the facility will provide an environment that is safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike. A homelike environment de-emphasizes the institutional character of the setting. Observation on 11/4/24, at 9:35 a.m. Resident R44 had two square floor tiles missing from the right side of the bed. Observation on 11/4/24, at 11:42 a.m. the Second-floor dining room had seven trays stacked with old dishes from breakfast on the table against the far wall. There were five residents eating their lunch at this time. One mechanical lift, and two unused wheelchairs were stored in one corner of the dining room, and two additional unused wheelchairs in the opposite corner. Observation on 11/4/24, at 10:42 a.m. Resident R56 had multiple divots (small holes/depressions) in the floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, facility documents, clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain residents were free from neglect for one of three residents (Resident R53). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse: Protection From Abuse dated 7/1/24, indicated residents have the right to be free from neglect and abuse. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R53 admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE]. Review of Resident R53's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 9/23/24, indicated the diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R53's witness statement dated 10/24/24, indicated the resident had to go to the bathroom in the middle of the night. I sat on the toilet and saw diarrhea in my brief. It was indicated she pulled the call bell, and Nurse Aide Employee E6, came and when she asked for assistance with changing her brief, NA, Employee E6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate a thorough investigation for incident or accidents for one of six residents (Resident R70). Findings include: The facility Accident and Incident-Investigating and Reporting policy dated 7/1/24, indicated all accidents or incidents occurring on the premises must be investigated and reported to the administrator. Review of clinical record indicated Resident R70 was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic atrial fibrillation (heart condition that causes the upper chambers of the heart to beat irregularly and often very fast), bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident R70's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a periodic assessment of resident care needs), dated 8/7/24, indicated diagnoses remained current. Review of Resident R70 nurse progress notes dated 10/3/24 at 1:16 p.m. Resident R70 was found by the elevator in the basement by a nurse aide around…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0620 — isolatedNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident records, admission documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain admission documentation for two of three residents (Resident R11, R67). Findings include: Review of Resident R11 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that include parkinsonism (neurodegenerative diseases that cause similar motor symptoms, such as rigidity, tremors, and slow movement), adjustment disorder with depressed mood and convulsions. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of Resident R11 admission MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment MDS- a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 6/18/24 indicated the resident was assessed as having a BIMS score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical and facility record review, facility provided documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident resulting in elopement (resident exited to an unsupervised and unauthorized location without staff's knowledge) for one of six residents(Resident R70). Findings include: The facility Resident Elopement policy dated 7/1/24, indicated the facility to provide a safe and secure environment for the residents and to be proactive in preventing resident elopement. Review of clinical record indicated Resident R70 was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic atrial fibrillation, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident R70's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a periodic assessment of resident care needs), dated 8/7/24, indicated diagnoses remained current. Review of Resident R70 nurse progress notes dated 10/3/24 at 1:16 p.m. Resident R70 was found by the elevator in the basement by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care related to oxygen equipment and management for three of four residents (Residents R33, R44 and R87). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Oxygen Administration dated 7/1/24, indicated oxygen therapy will be ordered as appropriate using nasal cannula (thin flexible tube that goes around the head and into the nose). Change pre-filled humidification systems at least weekly, along with oxygen tubing. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R33 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R33's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 8/2/24, indicated the diagnoses of anemia (the blood doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of diseases that block airflow and make it hard to breathe), and depression. Review of Resident R33's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to provide care for a resident requiring subcutaneous injections (insertion of medication beneath the skin) which led to an emergency room visit for one of seven residents (Resident 48). Findings include: Review of the facility's current Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Job Description indicated Drug Administration Function: Ensure that an adequate supply of floor stock medications, supplies, and equipment is on hand to meet the nursing needs of residents. Safety and Sanitation: Ensure that all personnel performing tasks that involve potential exposure to blood or body fluids participate in appropriate in-service training programs prior to performing such tasks. Equipment and Supply Functions: Participate in the development and implementation of the procedure for the safe operation of all nursing service equipment. Review of the admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to report abnormal lab results to the ordering physician timely for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident R58) Findings Include: Review of the facility Notification of Condition Change: Physician policy dated 7/1/24, revealed a change in a resident's condition will be reported to the physician in a timely manner, including abnormal lab values. Review of Resident 58's Physician orders revealed an order dated 11/3/24, for a urine culture (test of urine to determine if there is a Urinary Tract Infection). Review of Resident 58's Laboratory report for the urinalysis revealed the report was final and was reported on 11/4/24. The results had abnormal lab values. Interview with Infection Preventionist, Employee E8 on 11/6/24, at 9:50 a.m. indicated lab results are signed off after it is reviewed by a physician. It was indicated notification to the physician, lab results, and any new orders are documented in the resident's clinical record. Review of Resident R58's clinical record on 11/6/24, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide adaptive feeding devices for one of four residents (Resident R11). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Adaptive Eating Devices dated 7/1/24, indicated adaptive eating devices are pieces of equipment used by patients to enable them to achieve or maintain their highest level of eating independence. It was indicated the director of dining ensures that the patient meal identification states in the alert field the specific adaptive device needed or another system is in place. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R11 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review Resident R11's active physician order dated 6/11/24, indicated the resident is to have weighted utensils and divided plate. Review of Resident R11's MDS dated [DATE], indicated the diagnoses of high blood pressure, Parkinson's Disorder (a movement disorder of the nervous system that worsens over time), and dysphagia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders and notify a physician or abnormal glucose readings via a Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) level as ordered for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility Hypoglycemia Protocol indicated if a resident has asymptomatic (without symptoms) low blood glucose (less than 70 or physician ordered parameter), treatment includes hold all diabetic medications, including insulin and oral medications. Administer rapidly absorbed simple carbohydrate such as 4 ounces juice, or 5 or 6 ounce regular soda pop or tube of glucose gel per resident's routine. Repeat blood glucose measurement in 10-15 minutes. Notify physician per ordered parameters. Document physician notification and response. The Centers for Disease Control defines diabetes as: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic (long-lasting) health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy. Most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that weights were monitored as ordered for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Weight Monitoring and Weight Loss Intervention dated 7/1/23, indicated all residents will be weighed on admission, readmission, and at least monthly. More frequent weights may be obtained per facility policy. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/28/24, indicated diagnoses of renal failure (failure of the kidneys resulting in an inability to filter blood and remove waste), diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body). Review of a physician order dated 3/27/24, indicated to obtain weekly weights every Wednesday for four weeks. Review of Resident R1's Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, job description review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide care and services to meet the accepted standards of practice for four of five residents (Resident R36, R41, R76, and R84). Findings: Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy dated, 7/1/23, indicated medications are administered, as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so to comply with federal Laws governing Medication Administration and in order to ensure the safe, accurate, and timely administration of medications. It was indicated medications must be administered within 60 minutes before or after the scheduled times. It is stated unless otherwise specified by the physician, routine medications are administered according to the established medication administration schedule for the facility. Review of Resident R36's Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic review of care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, resident council group interview, resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to uphold resident rights and offer residents the opportunity to vote for the November 2023 election for one of three sampled residents (Resident R6). Findings include: The facility Resident voting policy dated 8/2016, last reviewed 7/1/23, indicated that staff will assist all residents to exercise his or her rights as a citizen. This includes, the right to vote. During a resident council group interview on 12/19/23, at 1:30 p.m. ten out of 11 residents stated they did not receive assistance with registering to vote for the November 2023 election. During an interview on 12/20/23, at 9:14 a.m. the Activities Director Employee E7 stated: I ask the residents if they want to vote. Most of the residents are registered to vote with a mail in ballot. During an interview on 12/20/23, at 10:56 a.m. the Activities Director Employee E7 stated: I looked through my desk. I was only able to find documentation showing proof for two residents. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, closed clinical records, resident fund account statements and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to convey resident funds in accordance with State law and closed accounts upon death in a timely manner for one out of five closed resident records (Closed Resident Records CR246). Findings include: The facility Resident fund distribution policy dated 9/2017, and last reviewed 7/1/23, indicated that available funds in the account will be distributed for burial arrangement, returned to the legally responsible party or submitted to the Estate Recovery fund if applicable within 30 days of death. Review of Closed Resident Records CR246's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypertension (a condition impacting blood circulation through the heart related to poor pressure), fracture of one rib, schizoaffective disorder (a mental condition characterized by delusions, hallucinations, or disorganized thought impacting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to notify a physician of abnormal blood pressure for two of two residents (Resident R14 and R84). Findings include: The facility Protocol-When to Call the Doctor policy dated 7/1/23, indicated the physicians caring for residents in the facility want to respond in an appropriate and timely manner to changes in condition as determined by nursing staff to address any concerns voiced by staff, residents, or family members. It was indicated the physician must be notified if a resident has vital signs abnormalities. The Centers for Disease Control defines blood pressure as the pressure of blood pushing against the walls of your arteries. Arteries carry blood from your heart to other parts of your body. High blood pressure, also known as hypertension, is blood pressure that is higher than normal. The higher your blood pressure levels, the more risk you have for other health problems, such as heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, documents and clinical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from neglect for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R79). Findings include: Review of policy titled Abuse: protection from abuse, last reviewed 7/1/23, indicated the resident has the right to be free from sexual, physical, mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect and misappropriation of property. Review of admission record indicated that Resident R79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R79's Minimum Data set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs dated 1/13/23, indicated diagnosis chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) , diabetes mellitus, dementia (loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning skills) and anxiety disorder. Review of facility submitted documentation dated 2/28/23, revealed that Resident R79 soaked in urine from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide discharge planning for resident needs prior to discharge for one of four residents (Resident R94). Findings include: Review of the facility's Post Discharge Plan policy dated 7/1/23, indicated when a facility anticipates a residents discharge to a private residence, a post discharge plan will be developed which will assist the resident to adjust to his or her new living environment. The resident or representative should provide the facility with a minimum of a 72 hour notice of a discharge to assure that an adequate discharge plan can be developed. Failure to comply with this rule could result in the facility being unable to develop a discharge plan and the medical record must be documented as to the reason why a discharge plan was not developed. Review of Resident R94's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record review, resident interview, resident council group interview and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services regarding bathing for one of four sampled residents (Resident R42). Findings include: The facility Flow of care policy last reviewed 7/1/23, indicated that care will be provided to residents 24-hours a day to attain and maintain the highest level of functioning. Residents are to have two baths or showers a week unless the resident states otherwise. Review of Resident R42's admission record indicated he was originally admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (a mental condition characterized by alternating periods of elation and depression), paraplegia, neuro-dysfunction of the bladder, history of falling and hypertension (a condition impacting blood circulation through the heart related to poor pressure). Review of Resident R42's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set--MDS assessment: a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan to address the resident's specific nutritional concerns and preferences for one of four (Resident R67) records reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy MDS/RAI/Care Planning, dated 7/1/23, indicated that residents will have a comprehensive assessment completed by day 14 of stay and a comprehensive care plan completed and reviewed within 7 days of the completion date of the MDS (Minimum Data Set assessment - a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs). The resident will then be assessed at least quarterly and care plan reviewed by the interdisciplinary team according to OBRA scheduled and more often if required for Medicare reimbursement. Policy further indicated that the facility will develop a written plan of care individualized for each resident, which identifies through an assessment process his/her strengths,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical record, observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications with a medication error rate that was less than five percent for two of five residents (Resident R36 and R84). Findings include: Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy dated, 7/1/23, indicated medications are administered, as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so to comply with federal Laws governing Medication Administration and in order to ensure the safe, accurate, and timely administration of medications. It was indicated medications must be administered within 60 minutes before or after the scheduled times. It was indicated unless otherwise specified by the physician, routine medication are adminstered according to the established medication administration schedule for the facility. Five medication errors occurred during 30 observed opportunities, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical record, observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents are free from significant medication errors for one of five residents (Resident R84). Findings include: Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy dated, 7/1/23, indicated medications are administered, as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so to comply with federal Laws governing Medication Administration and in order to ensure the safe, accurate, and timely administration of medications. It was indicated medications must be administered within 60 minutes before or after the scheduled times. Review of Resident R84's Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic review of care needs) dated 8/4/23, indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes (a disease that occurs when your blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents and resident clinical record and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident had the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement for two of three residents (Resident R11 and Resident R57). Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of admission record indicated Resident R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R11's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/18/20, indicated the diagnoses of down syndrome (a genetic disorder associated with physical growth delays, characteristic facial features and mild to moderate developmental and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain call bell equipment for two of five sampled residents (Resident R8 and R51). Findings include: The facility Call lights policy dated 7/1/23, indicated that a call light system is used by the faciltiy to respond to the resident's request. During observations on 12/19/23, at 11:24 a.m. Resident R8 call bell was observed on at first floor nurse station call bell monitor. The monitor showed Resident R8's call bell on for four minutes. Observations of light above Resident R8's room found not functioning. During an interview on 12/19/23, at 11:25 a.m. Housekeeper, Employee E4 confirmed the light above the Resident R8's room was not working. During observations on 12/19/23, at 10:29 a.m. Resident R51 call bell was observed on at third floor nurse station call bell monitor. The monitor showed Resident R51's call bell on for eight minutes. Observations of light above Resident R51's room found not functioning. During an interview on 12/19/23, at 10:30 a.m. Environmental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility assessment, Nurse Aide (NA) and nurse training documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff have annual in-service education necessary to care for residents' needs for four out of six employee records (NA Employee E1, NA Employee E2, NA Employee E13, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E14). Findings include: The facility assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the facility will maintain adequate trained and competent staff. Mandatory education for employees is delivered and tracked. Topics covered include abuse/neglect, resident rights, dementia overview, disaster preparedness, fire safety, infection control, workplace violence, and restorative nursing. Review of NA Employee E1's employee personnel record indicated he was hired as a nurse aide on 5/20/02 Review of NA Employee E2's employee personnel record indicated she was hired as a nurse aide on 3/29/17. Review of NA Employee E13`'s employee personnel record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to determine the ability to safely self-administer medications for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R294). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy Self-Administration of Medication last reviewed 7/21/22, indicated that the physician must order and the interdisciplinary team must assess the resident's ability to safely self-administer medications. Clinical record review revealed Resident R294 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), Convulsions (seizures), and Gastric Reflux Disease (stomach acid). Review of Physician Orders dated 12/11/22, indicated the facility failed to obtain an order for Resident R294 to self-administer medications. Review of Resident R294's care plan dated 12/9/22, failed to include a goal or interventions for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to make certain the physician orders regarding a resident's wishes regarding life sustaining treatments and the POLST (Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment) form were accurate for one of four residents (Resident R38). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Advanced Care Planning & POLST Process last reviewed 7/ 21/22, indicated requirements include provisions to inform and provide written information to all adult residents concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and, at the individual's option, formulate an advanced directive and/or POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment - a physician order that documents and directs the patient's medical considerations regarding life sustaining interventions.) Upon admission the resident will be offered the opportunity to complete a POLST form, the facility will assist the resident and notify the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to revise/update care plans for two of four residents to accurately reflect the current status of the residents (Residents R77 and R294). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Participation in Planning Care and Treatment dated 7/1/21, indicated that the care plan shall be reviewed, evaluated, and updated, as necessary. Review of admission record indicated Resident R294 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), Convulsions (seizures), and Gastric Reflux Disease (stomach acid). Observation of Resident R294's nebulizer equipment on 12/11/22, at 9:14 a.m. revealed no label indicating date last changed. Review of Resident R294's care plan indicated no goals or interventions for caring for the nebulizer equipment and tubing changes. Review of admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0680 — isolatedEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determine that the facility failed to ensure that the Activities Department had a qualified director to oversee the activities program. The findings include: Review of the Activity Director personnel file Employee E17, did not include information regarding the Activity Director having completed a state approved program to be qualified to oversee the Activity Program. During an interview on 12/13/22, at 2:30 p.m., Regional Nurse Employee E16 confirmed that the Activity Director was not qualified to oversee the Activity Program. 28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(3) Management.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy it was determined that the facility failed to notify a physician of abnormal glucose readings via a Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) level as per physician's order for one out of five residents (Resident R63). Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control defines diabetes as: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic (long-lasting) health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy. Most of the food you eat is broken down into sugar (also called glucose) and released into your bloodstream. When your blood sugar goes up, it signals your pancreas to release insulin. Insulin acts like a key to let the blood sugar into your body's cells for use as energy. If you have diabetes, your body either doesn't make enough insulin or can't use the insulin it makes as well as it should. When there isn't enough insulin or cells stop responding to insulin, too much blood sugar stays in your bloodstream. Over time, that can cause serious health problems, such as heart disease, vision loss, and kidney disease.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision with smoking materials and keep the resident environment free of accident hazards for two of four residents (Resident R40 and R44) and failed to provide an environment free of potential accidents and hazards relating to an electric heater for one of four residents (Resident R74). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Smoking Policy last reviewed 7/21/22, indicated [Cheswick Rehabilitation and Wellness Center] is a smoke free facility. Designated smoking areas have been established outside the building for those residents, staff or visitors who chose to smoke. Smoking restrictions apply to all smoking methods including cigarettes, pipes, cigars, and electronic cigarettes. Upon admission, residents will be questioned about about the use of electronic cigarettes and informed that these devices are prohibited on the facility premises. To ensure the safety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, weight documentation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to obtain weight monitoring documentation for one of two sampled residents (Resident R54). Findings include: The facility Nutrition Management policy last reviewed on 7/21/22, indicated that the facility will endure that a resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as body weight. Weight loss is a guide in determining nutritional status, an analysis of weight loss should be examined in light of the current diagnoses. If there is a five percent difference in weight, the resident will be reweighed within 72 hours. Review of Resident R54's admission record indicated that he was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included history of lumbar fracture, hypertension (a condition impacting blood circulation through the heart related to poor pressure) anxiety disorder, and hyperlipidemia (elevated lipid levels within the blood). Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, resident records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to discontinue the use of a enteral feed for one out two sampled residents (Resident R53). Findings include: The facility Feeding tubes policy reviewed on 7/1/21, indicated that residents that have been identified as requiring nutritional support will receive enteral (Tube) feeding per professional standards. Decisions to discontinue the use of a feeding tube are collaborative and involve the physician, interdisciplinary team, and include the relevance of a feeding tube. Review of Resident R53's admission record indicated she was originally admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hypertension (a condition impacting blood circulation through the heart related to poor pressure), and depressive disorder Review of Resident R53's care plan dated 5/24/22, indicated that the tube feed was required to maintain nutrition status. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions of respiratory equipment for two of two residents reviewed (Resident 294 and R77 ). Findings include: Review of facility policy Oxygen Administration dated 7/21/22, indicated the cannula or mask and tubing will be replaced weekly by nursing staff. Review of admission record indicated Resident R294 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), Convulsions (seizures), and Gastric Reflux Disease (stomach acid). Observation of Resident R294's nebulizer equipment (nebulizer changes a medication into a mist so it can be inhaled into the lungs) on 12/11/22, at 9:14 a.m. indicated no label indicating date last changed. Review of admission record indicated Resident R77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review Resident R77's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policies, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain the highest practicable pain management was achieved for one of four residents (Resident R50). Findings include: Review of facility policy Pain Management Guidelines dated 7/21/22, indicated functions of appropriate pain management include intervening to treat pain before the pain becomes severe and anticipating pain during activities that may be uncomfortable (i.e. dressing changes) and pre-treating with pain medication. Review of admission Record indicated Resident R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R50's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/1/22 indicated the diagnoses high blood pressure, depression, and falls. Review of Resident R50's care plan dated 11/4/22 indicated to assess for pain before, during and after treatments. Observation of Resident R50's dressing change to right unstageable heel ulcer on 12/12/22, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that any irregularities submitted in the medication regiment reviews (MRR) by pharmacy were acted upon for one out of five sampled residents (Resident R41). Findings include: The facility Unnecessary medications policy last reviewed on 7/21/22, indicated that each resident's drug regimen will be free from unnecessary drugs. There will be evidence that supports a justification of drug use and is in the best interest of the resident, such as a physician's note, a psychiatric consultation or evaluation, documentation confirming previous attempts at dosage reduction, and documentation showing resident's improvement. When antipsychotic drugs are used outside these guidelines without valid reasons, they may be deemed unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug used when in excessive dose, duration, and without adequate indications for use. The facility requires reason and substantiated rationale for use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days for one out of five sampled residents (Resident R41). Findings include: The facility Antipsychotic drug policy last reviewed on 7/21/22, indicated that there will be a 14 day limit on PRN orders. Orders may not extend beyond the 14 day limit. A new order for the PRN antipsychotic may be written every 14 days if the physician assesses the resident and documents clinical rationale for the new order. The facility Unnecessary medications policy last reviewed on 7/21/22, indicated that each resident's drug regimen will be free from unnecessary drugs. There will be evidence that supports a justification of drug use and is in the best interest of the resident, such as a physician's note, a psychiatric consultation or evaluation, documentation confirming previous attempts at dosage reduction, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to date multi-dose over the counter (OTC) medication bottles in two of five medication carts (1st floor, and 2 [NAME] Cart), and failed to properly secure a medication cart in one of five treatment carts (first floor). Findings include: The facility policy Storage of Medication last reviewed 7/21/22, indicated medications are stored in a safe, secure, and orderly manner in accordance with federal and state regulations and facility policies, and compartments containing medications are locked when not in use and are not left unattended. During an observation on 12/11/22, at 9:14 a.m. of the 1st floor medication cart revealed the following OTC medications were observed open without a date of opening: One bottle - Miralax (stool softener) One bottle - Milk of Magnesium (laxative) One bottle - Geri-Tussin (cough relief) During an interview on 12/11/22, at 9:15 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E11 confirmed the facility failed to date OTC medications once opened.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility assessment, facility in-service training and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to update the facility assessment to include competencies, resources, and required care for residents with substance abuse concerns for six out of six residents (Residents R13, R17, R18, R40, R64, and Resident R80). Findings include: The facility assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the facility will maintain adequate trained and competent staff. Mandatory education for employees is delivered and tracked. Review of Resident R13's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes ( metabolic disorder impacting organ function related to glucose levels in the human body), opioid abuse (a disorder characterized by misusing opioids, causing difficulty with decreasing use, impacting everyday tasks and creating negative social and physical consequences), and bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination during one of three resident dressing changes (Resident R50). Findings include: A review of facility policy Infection Control Program Overview updated 7/21/22, indicated the facility will implement and maintain an infection prevention and control program in order to prevent, recognize, and control, to the extent possible, the onset and spread of infection within the facility. Review of admission record indicates Resident R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R50's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/1/22, indicated diagnoses of falls, depression and high blood pressure. Review of physician orders for Resident R50 indicated the nurse is to clean the wound to right heel with Normal Sterile Saline (NSS), pat dry, apply Santyl (a collagen wound ointment) to wound base, cover…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-11-07 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a transfer notice to a representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division for four out of five residents (Residents R41, R58, R69, R70). Findings include: Review of Resident R41's admission record indicated she was originally admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included neurocognitive disorder with muscle weakness, high blood pressure, and insomnia (difficulty falling or staying asleep). Review of Resident R41's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on 9/28/24, and returned to the facility on 9/29/24. Review of Resident R41's clinical record indicated the facility failed to include documented evidence that the facility provided a written transportation notification to the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman for the transfer to hospital on 9/29/24. Review of Resident R58's admission record indicated she was originally admitted on [DATE], with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$112,925 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $112,925 — penalty dated 2026-04-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIBC BANK USA | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/06/2025 |
| KADIMA HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| PINNACLE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| DESMET, LYNN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| LOWDEN, THOMAS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| MORRIS, DANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| NAYLOR, DIEDRE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| RIEDERER, KARLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| STRAUSS, JONATHAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| CHESWICK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| KRESHON, JAMES | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| ROMEO, MICHELLE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $733K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395538. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.