No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Susquehanna Health And Wellness Center

745 Old Chickies Hill Road, Columbia, PA 17512 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 173 certified beds · (717) 684-7555 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (717) 684-7555 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$105,688 in federal fines
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $105,688 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-29)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
306 N 7th St · (717) 684-9106 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
306 N 7th St · (717) 588-1165 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
310 N 11th St · (717) 684-2459 · Call to confirm hours
Park
780 Chickies Hill Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
550 Linden St · (717) 239-5077

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.2%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.6%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.1%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.1%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.7%20.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.9%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.6%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.8%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.0%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.8%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.4%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.521.621.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.751.181.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 103 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.8%CMS range 28.5–54.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.7–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.7–12.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.83
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.03
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
47.7%
Total nursing turnover
30.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 173 beds and averages 165.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.14 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-17)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-07-25)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, hospital record, and facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that one of three residents (Resident R1) were free from significant medication errors which resulted in actual harm to Resident R1 requiring transfer to hospital and in patient monitoring due to medication administration. This was identified as a past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Administering Medication dated April 2019 revealed 1. Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer and document the administration of medications may do so.9. The individual administering medications verifies the resident's identity before giving the resident his/her medications. Methods of identifying the resident include: a. checking identification band; b. checking photograph attached to medical record and c. if necessary, verifying resident identification with other facility personnel. Review of Resident R1's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon clinical record review, staff interviews, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents are provided with dignity while receiving care for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 156).Findings include:Review of Resident 156's diagnosis list revealed diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (progressive disease of the central nervous system characterized by tremors, muscle weakness and unsteady gait), seizures and anxiety disorder).Review of Resident 156's clinical record revealed Resident 156 is receiving hospice services.Observation on June 15, 2026, at 9:52 a.m. revealed Resident 156 sitting in a Broda chair in the hallway near the B Wing nurses' station.Further observation on June 15, 2026, in the hallway near the nurses' station revealed that a hospice nurse was standing near Resident 156 and conducting a comprehensive physical examination of Resident 156 including taking blood pressure readings, pulse oximeter readings and questioning Resident 156 regarding resident's overall health and pain levels.Observation on June 15, 2026, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon clinical record review and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure notification to the State ombudsman's office occurred for hospital transfers for two of thirty-three residents reviewed. (Resident 18 and Resident 25).Findings include:Findings Include: Review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed Resident 18 was transferred to an acute care facility on February 7, 2026, and readmitted to the nursing facility on February 18, 2026. Further review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed Resident 18 was also transferred to an acute care facility on March 23, 2026, and returned to the nursing facility on March 31, 2026. Review of facility documentation failed to reveal evidence that the facility notified the State Ombudsman's office of Resident 18's two transfers and admissions to an acute care facility. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on June 17, 2026, at approximately 10:00 a.m. confirmed that the State Ombudsman's office was not properly notified of the transfers. Review of Resident 25's clinical record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess residents for two of two residents reviewed. (Residents 24 and 149)Findings Include: Review of Resident 24's clinical record reviewed Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure.Further review of Resident 24's clinical record revealed resident was discharged to an acute care facility on January 28, 2026.Further review of Resident 24's clinical record failed to reveal evidence that a discharge MDS (periodic assessment of resident needs) was completed upon discharged .Review of Resident 149's clinical record revealed resident was admitted [DATE], and discharged [DATE].Further review of Resident 149's clinical revealed that a Discharge MDS (Minimum Data Set - periodic assessment of resident needs) was not completed.Interview with Licensed Employee E5 on June 17, 2026 at 2:15 p.m. confirmed that no discharge MDS was completed for Resident 24 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide timely care and services for two of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 2 and 11). Findings include:Findings Include: Review of Resident 2's clinical record finds an SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) Summary on June 12, 2026, at 11:24 p.m. that states, 2246 Notified by staff that resident was having a seizure, resident had tonic-clonic movements, with muscle spasms, lasting 20 minutes in bed . PRN (as needed) seizure med was not available from pharmacy . Notified on call provider, ordered for resident to be sent to ER, 911 was called. Further review of Resident 2's electronic medication administration on June 12, 2026, record reveals that there was not an administration of Nayzilam Nasal Solution (Anticonvulsant) which was ordered as needed for breakthrough seizures. Further review of Resident 2's progress notes on June 12, 2026, at 11:24 p.m. finds that, EMT came at 2315 gave resident 2 rounds of IV versed resident was still…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review it was determined the facility failed to ensure that one of five residents reviewed was free from accidents and provided adequate supervision for Resident 12. Review of Resident 12's diagnosis sheet revealed diagnoses type 2 diabetes (insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar), and Alzheimer's Dementia (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). Review of Resident 12's June 2026 Medication Administration Record revealed an order for Metformin HCl Tablet 500 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Review of facility documentation revealed that on June 12, 2026, Resident 12 was administered crushed Metformin HCL tablet 500mg in coffee by Licensed Nursing Employee E6. Licensed Nursing Employee E6 then failed to observe Resident 12 until they had finished the coffee with the medications crushed inside. Resident 12 drank some of the coffee with the medication and set the coffee cup on the table. Licensed Nursing Employee E6 then failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain and monitor weights for one of eight residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 45).Findings Include:Review of facility policy Weight Assessment and intervention revised September 2008 revealed that .Negative trends will be evaluated by the treatment team whether or not the criteria for significant weight change has been met. Interventions for undesirable weight loss shall be based on careful consideration.Review of Resident 45's clinical record revealed recorded weights of 151.4 pounds January 7, 2026; 140.2 pounds February 2, 2026, with a reweight on February 18, 2026, of 162 pounds; 140.4 pounds March 4, 2026.Further review of Resident 45's clinical record revealed a dietary note dated March 4, 2026, indicating the resident's weight. Further review of the same dietary note failed to reveal recommendations to address the weight loss from January 7, 2026, to February 2, 2026 (loss of 11.2pounds or 7.40% in one month).Interview with Employee E4 on June 17,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon medication insert review, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled with open and expiration dates for three of six medication carts observed (A South Medication Cart, A South Back Medication Cart and B South Back Medication Cart).Findings include:Review of medication packaging inserts for Novolog (short acting) Insulin and Lantus (long acting) Insulin revealed that Novolog Insulin Pens and Lantus Insulin Pens are to be refrigerated until opened. If unrefrigerated, the pens must be marked with the date of removal from the refrigerator and used within 28 days.Observation of the A South Medication Cart on June 17, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. revealed three unopened and undated Novolog Insulin Pens and two unopened and undated Lantus Insulin Pens.Observation of the A South Back Medication Cart on June 17, 2026, at 11:08 a.m. revealed one opened and undated Novolog Insulin Pen.Observation of the B South Back Medication Cart on June 17, 2026, at 11:14 a.m. revealed one unopened and undated Novolog Insulin Pen; one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was assessed by a dentist for one of one resident. (Resident 164)Findings include: Review of Resident R164's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar), and congestive heart failure (excessive body/lung fluid caused by a weakened heart muscle). Interview on June 16, 2026, at 9:33 a.m. with Resident R164 revealed the resident does not have dentures and had requested dentures several times. Review of Resident R164's clinical record revealed no evidence that the facility arranged for or followed up on dental services to obtain dentures following the request. Interview on June 17, 2026, at 10:22 a.m. with Director of Social Services confirmed there was no documentation about further dental consults for Resident R164. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with residents, review of facility policy, observations, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was at an appetizing temperature on one of four units (B wing - Countryside). Findings include:An interview held with alert and oriented residents on June 15, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. revealed that food is cold for all meals. Review of facility policy, Food Presentation, undated, indicated foods will be served at proper temperatures. Hot foods hot and cold foods cold. A test tray conducted on June 16, 2026, on B-wing Countryside, in the presence of Employee E3, revealed that the meal cart left the kitchen at 12:03 p.m. Food temperatures taken at 12:37 p.m. after all residents had been served revealed the following: [NAME] Pilaf - 119.8 degrees FahrenheitCrab Cake - 123.7 degrees FahrenheitMixed Vegetables 109.0 degrees Fahrenheit Interview at that time with Employee E3 indicated that food could be a little hotter. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to complete a performance review at least once every 12 months for five of five nurse aides (Employees E4, E5, E6, E7, and E8).Findings include:Review of Employee E4's personnel record revealed a date of hire of October 11, 2023.Review of Employee E5's personnel record revealed a date of hire of May 24, 2023.Review of Employee E6's personnel record revealed a date of hire of June 8, 2022.Review of Employee E7's personnel record revealed a date of hire of September 3, 2019.Review of Employee E8's personnel record revealed a date of hire of October 6, 2021.Further review of the personnel records revealed no evidence that the employees had a performance review at least once every 12 months.Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on July 25, 2025, at 10:10 a.m. confirmed that performance reviews had not been completed for the above employees.28 Pa. Code 201.19(2) Personnel policies and procedures

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon review of facility policy and procedure, observation and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed during medication administration observation and pressure ulcer wound treatments for three of three residents observed (Resident 6, Resident 22 and Resident 136.)Findings include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Administering Medications revealed “Staff follows established facility infection control procedures (e.g. handwashing, aseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc) for the administration of medications, as applicable.” Observation of Medication Administration on July 22, 2025, at 11:44 a.m. revealed Licensed Employee E9 placing medication pills for administration into Licensed Employee E9’s ungloved hands and then placing the medication pill into the medication cup for administration. Observations on all days of the survey revealed no system in place to communicate to staff that resident required enhanced barrier precautions. Additionally, no PPE (personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include:Observations on July 22, 2025, at 2:20 p.m. and July 24, 2025, at 12:00 p.m. revealed Resident 1 receiving oxygen via nasal cannula.Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed no care plan for oxygen use.Interview with the Director of Nursing on July 25, 2025, at 11:23 a.m. confirmed that Resident 1 did not have a care plan for oxygen use.483.21 Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care PlanPreviously cited 8/22/2428 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing ServicesPreviously cited 8/22/24

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 4 and 22). Findings include:Review of facility policy, Weight Assessment and Intervention revised September 2008, revealed monthly weights will be completed no later than the 7th day of the month. Additionally, any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken the next day for confirmation.Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed that the resident weighed 150.0 pounds on April 28, 2025. The resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of a weight warning note on May 9, 2025, revealed a weight of 181.3 pounds and indicated a suspected discrepancy in weight. A reweight was requested. Review of the clinical record revealed a reweight of 135.0 pounds was obtained on May 20, 2025 (11 days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include:Observations on July 22, 2025, at 2:20 p.m. and July 24, 2025, at 12:00 p.m. revealed Resident 1 receiving oxygen via nasal cannula (tube that delivers oxygen) at a flow rate of 2.0 liters per minute.Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed no order for oxygen or respiratory care.Interview with the Director of Nursing on July 25, 2025, at 11:23 a.m. confirmed that Resident 1 did not have an order for oxygen use.483.25 Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and SuctioningPreviously cited 3/5/25, 8/22/2428 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3)(5) Nursing ServicesPreviously cited 8/22/24

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate and competent staffing levels were maintained to promptly respond to resident call bells on one day of three days of the survey.Findings include:Observation on July 23, 2025, at 12:07 p.m. on the B Wing nursing unit revealed five resident call bells with the lights on and audibly ringing, as well as lunch carts in the hallway that had been delivered to the unit from the kitchen.Observation of the B Wing nursing unit nurses' station on July 23, 2025, at 12:07 p.m. revealed four employees gathered in a side room with the door closed.Further observation of the B Wing nursing unit nurses' station on July 23, 2025, at 12:07 p.m. revealed a licensed employee sleeping in front of the computer at the desk.Observation of the B Wing resident call bells revealed the resident call bells remained unanswered and the lunch trays not delivered for approximately 15 minutes.The above information was conveyed to the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on July 25, 2025, at 11:30 a.m. 28 Pa. Code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and procedures and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled with open and expiration dates and failed to ensure expired medications were not administered for one of three medication carts reviewed (B Wing Medication Cart).Findings include:Based upon facility policy and procedure titled Storage of Medications revealed Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed.Review of facility policy and procedure titled Administering Medications revealed The expiration/beyond use date on the medication label is checked prior to administering. When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container.Review of package insert instructions for Humalog Insulin (medication used to treat high blood sugar levels) Pens revealed unopened Humalog pens should be stored in the refrigerator.Further review of package insert instructions for Humalog Insulin Pens revealed that once opened, Humalog can be kept at room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, hospital record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and follow the physician's orders for two of the two residents reviewed (Resident CL1 and Resident 1). Findings include: A review of Resident CL1's hospital records dated February 2, 2025, revealed that the resident was sent to the hospital on January 26, 2025, for shortness of breath and was admitted with a diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Failure. The same report revealed that the Resident was using a BIPAP (a non-invasive ventilator technique that provides pressurized air to assist with breathing) in the hospital. A review of the hospital record BIPAP order dated February 10, 2025, revealed Auto Bipap Max-18 Min-5 PS-5 for associated diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Failure and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (A potentially serious sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and starts). A review of the hospital discharge summary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and resident's representative, in writing, regarding the reason for hospitalization for five of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 18, 36, 38, 77, 85). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 18, dated June 17, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for his daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia. A nursing note for Resident 18, dated June 11, 2024, revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital for evaluation of abdominal pain and to have his indwelling urinary catheter flushed or replaced. He was admitted to the hospital with a urinary tract infection. There was no documented evidence that a written notice of Resident 18's transfer to the hospital was provided to the resident's responsible party regarding the reason for transfer. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 36,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for seven of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 28, 52, 53, 91, 94, 139, 162). Findings include: The Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated [DATE], revealed that Section O0110G1b (non-invasive mechanical ventilator) was to be checked if a CPAP/BIPAP device (respiratory support devices that prevent airways from closing by delivering slightly pressurized air through a mask or other device continuously or via electronic cycling throughout the breathing cycle) was used while a resident within the last 14 days. Physician's orders for Resident 28, dated [DATE], included an order for the resident to use a CPAP/BIPAP with distilled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs of residents for six of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 8, 25, 27, 38, 53, 120). Findings include: A facility policy for Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, dated June 1, 2024, included that the interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each person. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan was to be developed within seven days of the completion of the required MDS assessment (admission, annual or change in significant status), and no more than 21 days after admission. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physicians orders were followed for three of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 104, 112, 139). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) assessment for Resident 104, dated June 14, 2024, indicated that the resident was understood and able to understand others, was dependent on staff for personal hygiene care, and had diagnoses that included cancer and anxiety. Physician's orders for Resident 104, dated June 29, 2024, and August 5, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 150 milligrams (mg) of Depo-Provera (a medication containing hormones that has been found effective in reducing offensive sexual behavior) intramuscularly one time a day every seven days for impulse disorder. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 104 for July 2024 revealed no documented evidence that the resident was administered the Depo-Provera injection as ordered on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received assistance devices to prevent accidents for two of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 109, 125) and failed to protect the safety of other residents from violence from two of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 52, 85). Findings include: A comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 109, dated May 15, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance for daily care needs including transfers and locomotion. Observations of Resident 109 on August 19, 2024, at 12:28 p.m. revealed that the resident was sitting in a wheelchair while being transported to her room by Nurse Aide 2. There were no footrests on her wheelchair to prevent her feet from dragging during the transport. An interview with Nurse Aide 2 revealed that he did not know if she had leg rests or not and did not know if she needed them. An interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free from significant medication errors for two of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 8, 56). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated June 1, 2024, indicated that medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 8, dated July 17, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for personal care needs, and had diagnosis that included diabetes. Nurse's note for Resident 8, dated August 16, 2024, indicated that a new physician's order was obtained to decrease the resident's Levemir (type of long-acting insulin used to lower blood sugar) to 33 units every day. Physician's orders for Resident 8, dated August 16, 2024, included an order to discontinue giving 35 units of Levemir insulin once…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable to residents. Findings include: Interviews on August 19, 2024, with Resident 28 at 12:17 p.m. and Resident 56 at 12:22 p.m. revealed that the food was terrible and a little rough. The posted menu for August 20, 2024, revealed that the lunch meal was chicken teriyaki, fluffy steamed rice, seasoned broccoli, and sherbet. Observations in the kitchen on August 20, 2024, at 11:57 p.m. revealed that a test tray was placed on the lunch meal cart going to the A wing. The cart arrived on the unit at 11:59 p.m., and the last resident was served and eating at 12:15 p.m. At 12:15 p.m. the temperature of the chicken teriyaki was 131.7 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and was dry, and the temperature of the seasoned broccoli was 134.7 degrees F and it was mushy. Interview with the Dietary Manager on August 20, 2024, at 12:15 p.m. confirmed that the chicken appeared dry and the broccoli was mushy and over-cooked. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(1) Management.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and failed to effectively sanitize dishes during mechanical dishwashing. Findings include: The facility's policy for food storage, dated June 1, 2024, revealed that leftover food was to be stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely, and each item was to be clearly labeled and dated before being refrigerated. Observations of the walk-in refrigerator and dry storage area on August 19, 2024, at 8:45 a.m. revealed that there were two Styrofoam containers that contained cooked eggs/omelets that were not dated or labeled, and one gallon of corn syrup that was open without a lid. Interview with the Dietary Manager on August 19, 2024, at 8:45 a.m. confirmed that staff should have labeled and dated the Styrofoam containers of eggs and she was not sure why there was no lid on the gallon of corn syrup in the dry storage area. Observations in the main…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' clinical records were complete and accurately documented for three of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 94, 98, 112). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 94, dated July 10, 2024, revealed that the resident could usually make herself understood and understand others, was cognitively impaired, and had diagnoses that included dementia and a stroke. Nurse aide documentation for Resident 94 for June, July and August 2024 revealed that staff were documenting every shift that the resident was wearing a wander bracelet (alarming device) June 14 through August 20, 2024. Observations of Resident 94 on August 20, 2024, at 11:06 a.m. revealed that the resident was sitting in her wheelchair and did not have a wander bracelet (alarming device) on. Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained dignity for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 48). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 48, dated August 6, 2024, indicated that the resident was understood and able to understand others, required substantial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene care, and had diagnoses that included diabetes. Observations of Resident 48 on August 19, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. revealed that she was lying in her bed with many long, white hairs protruding from under her chin. An interview with Resident 48 at that time revealed that she does not like having the long hair on her chin because it sometimes gets caught on her blankets and pulls her skin. Observations of Resident 48 on August 21, 2024, at 7:47 a.m. and on August 22, 2024, at 12:07 p.m. revealed that the resident continued to have many long, white hairs protruding from under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to determine a resident's preference for bathing for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 48). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 48, dated August 6, 2024, indicated that the resident was understood and able to understand others; required substantial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene care; had a preference that was was very important to her to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath; and had diagnoses that included diabetes. Review of the care plan for Resident 48, dated August 2, 2024, revealed that the resident required assist of one staff for bathing; however, it did not indicate if the resident preferred showers, tub baths or bed baths. Interview with the Director of Nursing on August 22, 2024, at 2:10 p.m. revealed that there was no documented evidence that Resident 48's shower preferences were identified to enable staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that in preparation for room changes each resident received written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room or roommate was changed for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 139). Findings include: Review of Resident 139's clinical record and quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 139, dated July 1, 2024, revealed that the resident could understand others and make herself understood and was cognitively intact. A social service note, dated August 12, 2024, at 9:45 a.m., revealed that Resident 139 toured the A-unit, was introduced to several nursing staff on the unit, and was in agreement with the room at that time. A facility census report revealed that Resident 139 was moved from the B-wing to a room on the A unit on August 12, 2024. There was no documented evidence that Resident 139 was provided a written notice prior to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for nine of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 22, 82, 112, 120, 131, 136, 153, 155, 157). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October, 2023, indicated that an admission MDS assessment was to be completed no later than 14 days (admission date + 13 calendar days) following admission. A comprehensive admission MDS assessment for Resident 22, dated June 27, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and the resident's admission MDS assessment was dated as completed on July 9, 2024, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required timeframe for seven of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 21, 26, 64, 70, 98, 139, 148). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of residents' abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, indicated that the completion date for a quarterly assessment is the Assessment Reference Date (ARD - the last day of an assessment's look-back period) plus 14 days. A quarterly assessment is due every 92 days (ARD of most recent assessment + 92 days). A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 21, with an ARD of May 10, 2024, was completed on May 27, 2024, which was three days late. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 26, with an ARD of May 10, 2024, was completed on May…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for the administration of oxygen for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 139). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 139, dated July 1, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, had medical diagnoses that included heart failure and respiratory failure, and used oxygen. The resident's care plan, dated March 7, 2024, revealed that staff were to administer oxygen as ordered by the physician. Observations on August 19, 2024, at 12:11 p.m. revealed that Resident 139 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula (tube that delivers oxygen) set at a flow rate of 2.0 liters per minute. There was no documented evidence that a physician's order was received for the administration of oxygen. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on August 21, 2024, at 3:23 p.m. confirmed that there was no physician's order for Resident 139 to receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for three of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 36, 94, 116). Findings include: A facility policy for medication administration, dated June 1, 2024, indicated that the individual administering a medication initials the resident's MAR on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 36, dated July 23, 2024, indicated that the resident was understood and able to understand others, required substantial to maximum assistance for his daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia. Physician's orders for Resident 36, dated June 15, 2024, and July 17, 2024, included to administer 50 milligrams (mg) of Tramadol (a controlled medication use to treat pain) every eight hours as needed for right shoulder or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label medications with the date they were opened in one of two medication rooms reviewed (A unit) and in two of four medication carts reviewed (A and B unit). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication storage/labeling, dated June 1, 2024, indicated that multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. An undated package insert for Tubersol (used to test for tuberculosis - a bacterial infection) revealed that once entered/opened, the vial was to be discarded after 30 days. Observations in the medication room refrigerator on the A unit on August 22, 2024, at 12:18 p.m. revealed that an opened vial of Tubersol was not properly labeled with the date it was opened. An interview with Registered Nurse 1 at that time confirmed that the opened vial of Tubersol was not properly labeled with the date it was opened and should have been.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for three of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 25, 77, 94). Findings include: CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's - bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics, and these antibiotics can no longer be used to control or kill the bacteria), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Resident R8's care plan was comprehensive including mental health diagnosis and associated behaviors for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident R8). Findings include: Review of the clinical record for Resident R8 revealed the following diagnoses: Schizophrenia (serious mental illness which impacts a person's ability to perceive the world around them in the same way) and Major Depressive Disorder (mental health disorder characterized by low self-esteem, loss of interest in normally enjoyable activities, low energy, and pain without a clear cause). Review of Resident R8's clinical record failed to reveal a care plan goal/interventions for Schizophrenia indicating that the resident should be monitored for mental health associated behaviors and side effects of medication. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on August 23, 2023, at 1:15 p.m. revealed that the facility was not documenting the residents behaviors and did not have a care plan for the medication. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$105,688 in federal fines across 9 penalties.

  • $48,731 — penalty dated 2024-03-29
  • $4,893 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
  • $14,679 — penalty dated 2024-01-30
  • $4,893 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
  • $4,892 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • $4,634 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
  • $4,643 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
  • $13,778 — penalty dated 2023-10-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SNHHC LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/09/2021
SAR FT FAMILY TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/09/2021
ATWOOD, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MANDEL, AVITALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/09/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$686K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 89%Medicare 3%Other / private 8%

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $686K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$328per resident / day
operating cost
$9,975per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$280per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395400. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next