Cedar Hill Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center
951 Brodhead Road, Coraopolis, PA 15108 · For profit - Individual · 150 certified beds · (412) 269-1101 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Oct 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0569)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.3% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.6% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.2% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.3% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.8% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.0% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.2% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 33.7% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 41.1% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.2% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.91 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.83 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.0%CMS range 37.7–63.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.2%CMS range 6.1–12.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 83.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.6–11.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 136.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable, and homelike environment by not maintaining an acceptable water temperature for two of three units (North Unit and South Unit).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Resident Environment last reviewed 2/16/26, indicates the facility will provide an environment that is safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike. Review of the facility policy Water Temperature last reviewed 2/16/26, indicates water distribution systems shall be designed and arranged to provide potable hot and cold water at hot and cold-water outlets at all times. Review of the facility provided grievance log on 4/28/26, revealed two concerns about the hot water temperatures. On 2/25/26, a resident filed a concern about the hot water temperatures. The facilities corrective action was water in shower rooms checked; temperatures within range, the resident was notified by maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident representative of the start of a new antibiotic for one of three residents (Resident R136).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Notification of Change of Condition: Responsible Party/Guardian last reviewed 4/2/25, indicated the responsible party or guardian is to be notified of changes in condition or occurrences. The nurse must document the name of the person notified, the date and time in the nurse's notes. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R136 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R136's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/20/25, included diagnoses of high blood pressure, depression and heart failure (the heart doesn't pump the way it should). Review of Resident R136's physician orders dated 6/18/25, indicated Keflex oral capsule (treats bacterial infection) give 500…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record, facility documents, reports submitted to the State, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect for one of three residents (Resident R2).Findings include: Review of facility Abuse Protection policy last reviewed 4/2/25, indicated regardless of how minor an accident or incident may be, it must be reported to the department supervisor as soon as such accident/incident is discovered or when information of such accident/incident has been discovered. The reporting and filing of accurate documents relative to incidents of abuse, reporting to State agencies as required. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/30/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, cancer, and mood disorder. MDS Section GG-Functional Abilities, GG0130 Self-Care for lower body dressing was coded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) accurately reflected the resident's status for two of three residents (Resident R4 and R84).Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set Assessments dated October 2024, indicated the following instructions: Section O: Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs, indicated to document what services and treatments were performed while a resident of the facility and within the last 14 days. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R4's MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of end stage renal disease (kidneys no longer function), high blood pressure and diabetes (high sugar in the blood).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a care plan for two of three residents (Resident R1 and R97) to accurately reflect the current status of the resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy “Care Plan” last reviewed 4/2/25, indicated the facility’s interdisciplinary team will develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident. The residents’ care plan shall be developed upon admission and implemented as soon as possible thereafter and describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents’ highest practical physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 6/9/25, indicated the diagnoses of high blood pressure, depression and diabetes (high sugar in the blood). A review of Resident R1’s physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice when obtaining physician orders for one of four residents. (Resident R136).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication and Treatment Orders last reviewed 4/2/25, indicated telephone or verbal orders must be recorded in the clinical record, under physician orders when received and must be recorded by the nurse receiving the order. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R136 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R136's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/20/25, included diagnoses of high blood pressure, depression and heart failure (the heart doesn't pump the way it should). Review of Resident R136's nursing progress note dated 5/5/25, indicated Unit Manager (UM) called 3-11 Registered Nurse (RN) supervisor (sup) requested to put in order provided by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and review of the facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate assistance with meals for one of three residents (Resident R65). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Flow of Care last reviewed 4/2/25, indicated the flow of care is to be implemented on a continuous basis to promote quality of life with the residents. The charge nurse will be responsible for evaluating compliance with the flow of care expectations to ensure that needs are met on an ongoing basis. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R65's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/14/25, indicated the diagnoses of heart failure (the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), and dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and treatment as ordered by physician for one of three residents (Residents R2) and have a physician order for a continuous glucose monitoring device for one of one resident (Resident R97).Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication and Treatment Orders dated 4/2/25, indicated all medication and treatment orders must be carried out exactly as prescribed by the physician or other licensed prescriber. Nursing staff are responsible for documenting administration and monitoring the resident's response to all medication and treatments. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/30/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, cancer, and fracture. Review of Resident R2's physician order dated 7/25/25, revealed the resident was ordered to wear sling at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review facility policies, observations, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that appropriate treatments and services were provided for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter as required for one of three residents (Resident R134).Findings include: Review of facility Resident Rights last reviewed 4/2/25, indicated the resident has a right to a dignified existence. This facility will promote the exercise of rights for each resident. The facility will protect and promote the rights of each resident including but not inclusive to privacy and confidentiality. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R134 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of high blood pressure, obstructive and reflux uropathy (urine can't flow normally due to blockage) and urinary tract infection. Review of Resident 134's physician orders dated 8/23/24, indicated the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter (closed sterile system inserted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy and staff and interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's receiving dialysis received care and treatment as ordered and ensured fluid restrictions were maintained for one of two residents (Resident R6).Findings include: Review of facility policy Dialysis Care dated 4/2/25, indicated residents ordered dialysis therapy will be monitored, and documentation will be maintained in the medical record. All residents receiving dialysis treatment will have their access site assessed every shift. Review of the facility's Care Plan policy dated 4/2/25, revealed the facility will develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident. The care plan shall be reviewed, evaluated, and updated as necessary, by professionals involved in the care of the resident. Review of facility policy Medication and Treatment Orders dated 4/2/25, indicated all medication and treatment orders must be carried out exactly as prescribed by the physician or other licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review and staff interviews, it was determined to facility failed to provide a trauma survivor with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of one residents (Resident R73). Findings: Review of Resident R73's record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a psychiatric disorder that may occur in persons that have witnessed a traumatic event causing intense, disturbing thoughts and feelings related to the experience), dysphagia (difficulty or impairment in swallowing) and anxiety. Review of physician orders dated 8/13/25, included buspirone (medication used to treat anxiety) and fluoxetine (medication used to treat anxiety). Review of Resident R73's assessments did not include a Trauma Informed Care Evaluation (a data collection tool that gathers information on traumatic events and aids in identifying and addressing the resident's needs). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, the facility's tray assembly tickets, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their tray assembly tickets for preferences for two of five residents (Resident R11 and R124). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Dining and Food Preferences dated 4/2/25, indicated individual dining, food, and beverage preferences are identified for all residents. The individual tray assembly ticket will identify all food items appropriate for the resident based on diet order, allergies and intolerances, and preferences. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Resident R11's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/10/25, indicated the diagnoses of anemia (low iron in the blood) high blood pressure and diabetes (high sugar in the blood). Review of Resident R11’s physician orders dated 5/12/25, indicated low potassium diet,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of resident council meeting minutes, review of grievance logs, observations, staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate the call bell needs for four of nine residents (Resident R2, R3, R4 and R7) Findings include: Review of facility policy Call Lights last reviewed 4/2/25, indicated a call light system is used by this facility to respond to the resident request and needs. Answer the resident's call as soon as possible. Review of the facility policy Call Light Response last reviewed 4/2/25, indicated staff will respond to the call light and the residents request and needs in a timely manner. Review of the facility policy Flow of Care last reviewed 4/2/25, indicated care will be provided to residents, as needed 24 hours a day to attain and maintain the highest level of functioning. The flow of care is to be implemented on a continuous basis to promote quality of life with the resident. Call light within reach for all residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) appropriately, which created the potential for the cross-contamination and the spread of diseases and infections in two out of 18 droplet precautions (infection control measures designed to prevent the spread of infectious diseases that are transmitted through respiratory droplets) rooms. (Covid and Exposed Unit). Findings include: Review of facility policy Isolation Procedure: Resident placement in Transmission-Based Precautions dated 4/17/24, indicated transmission-based precautions (including droplet) will be implemented when indicated by suspicion or presence of infectious disease. Initiate precautions as indicated. Review of facility policy Personal Protective Equipment dated 4/17/24, indicated personal protective equipment (PPE) is available at all times. PPE includes gowns, gloves, masks, eyewear. Review of facility policy Coronavirus (Covid-19) policy dated 4/17/24, indicated facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide privacy and confidentiality of resident healthcare information for twelve of thirty-seven residents (Residents R3, R28, R33, R57, R76, R81, R94, R117, R122, R123, R131 and R435). Findings include: The facility policy Health Insurance Portability and Accounting Act of 1996 (HIPPA) dated 4/17/24, indicated this facility will keep information regarding a resident ' s health private and confidential. The facility policy Resident rights dated 4/17/24, indicates this facility will protect and promote the rights of each resident, including but not inclusive to privacy and confidentiality. The facility policy Coronavirus (Covid-19) dated 4/17/24, indicated this guidance is to provide the facility an overview of key actions required to reduce risk and prevent the potential spread of infections to patients and staff. Procedure includes but not inclusive to placing appropriate signage outside of room to identify that precautions are needed. During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to the failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at the bedside for three of three of seven residents (Residents R36, R50 and R98). Findings include: Review of the facility Medication Administration policy dated 4/17/24, indicated medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so to comply with federal laws governing medication administration and in order to ensure safe, accurate, and timely administration of medications. In order for residents to self-administer medications, an attending physician must authorize to do so in accordance with procedures for self-administration of medications. Review of the facility Storage of Medications policy dated 4/17/24, indicated medications are stored in a safe, secure, and orderly manner in accordance with federal and state regulations and facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain call bells were in reach for two of seven residents as required (Resident R30 and R108). Findings include: The facility policy Call Lights dated 4/17/24, indicated when a resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. Review of Resident R30's clinical record indicated admission to the facility on 3/13/24. Review of Resident R30's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 9/19/23, indicated diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure) hyperlipidemia (high fats in the blood) and depression. During an interview and observation on 9/16/24, at 10:05 a.m. Resident R30's was sitting in her wheelchair, her call light button was wrapped on enabler/side rail assist bar on the other side of bed. When Resident R30 was asked what she would do if she needed help, she stated I don't know, I can't reach have my…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assure physician orders, residents' Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a legal document specifying the resident/responsible party choices regarding life-sustaining treatments), was available for one of four residents (Residents R336). Findings include: The facility Advanced Directives policy dated 4/17/24, indicated that this policy shall establish guidelines for medical treatment decision-making that both recognize and respect the residents right of self-determination. Review of Resident R336's clinical record indicate an admission date of 9/13/24, with diagnoses including diabetes (high sugar in the blood), hypertension (high blood pressure), and hyperlipidemia (high fat in the blood), Review of Resident R336 clinical record 9/18/24, at 12:30 p.m. failed to reveal a POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) or a physician order for code status. During an interview on 09/18/24, at 12:37 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a transfer notice to a representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division for two of two residents (Resident R41, and R107). Findings Include: A review of the facility policy Documentation of Discharges or Deaths last reviewed 4/17/24, indicated all discharges will be sent to the Office Ombudsman's office at the end of the month. Review of Resident R41's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease without heart failure (long-term condition that develops over many years in people who have high blood pressure), dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice in the identification of a resident's diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder for one of five residents (Resident R45). Findings include: Review of the American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), Fifth Edition, Schizoaffective Disorder, Diagnostic Criteria included, but is not limited to: A. An uninterrupted period of illness during which there is a major mood episode (major depressive or manic) concurrent with Criterion-A of schizophrenia: --Two (or more) of the following, each present for a significant portion of time during a one-month period (or less if successfully treated). At least one of these must be (1), (2), or (3): --1. Delusions. --2. Hallucinations. --3. Disorganized speech (e.g., frequent derailment or incoherence). --4. Grossly disorganized or catatonic behavior. --5. Negative symptoms (i.e., diminished emotional expression or avolition).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision resulting in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one out of three sampled residents (Closed Resident Record CR132). Findings include: The facility Resident elopement policy dated 4/17/24, indicated that elopement is defined as a resident leaving the physical structure of the facility without the knowledge of facility staff. Review of Closed Resident Record CR132's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Closed Resident Record CR132's initial nurse assessment dated [DATE], indicated he was admitted with diagnosed that include chronic kidney disease (a loss of kidney function resulting in the swelling of feet, fatigue, high blood pressure and changes in urination), hyperlipidemia (elevated lipid levels within the blood), and generalized muscle weakness.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and interview, the facility failed to have physician order specifications relating to size of indwelling catheter for one of three residents (Residents R103). Findings include: Review of facility policy Indwelling Foley Catheter, Appropriate Use Protocol dated 4/17/24, indicated indwelling catheters will be only changed if needed due to leakage or becoming dislodged or clogged. Review of the facility policy Medication and Treatment Orders dated 4/17/24, indicated treatment orders will contain what is to be done, frequency, and duration of treatment. Review of admission record indicated Resident R103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of high blood pressure, kidney insufficiency, and depression. Review of Resident R103's care plan dated 12/12/23, indicated the resident had a foley catheter (a tube inserted in the bladder to drain urine.) Review of Resident R103's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 8/16/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain physician's orders, conduct ongoing accurate assessments and failed to obtain a consent to ensure that enabler/side rail assist bars were used to meet residents' needs and the risks associated with enabler bar/side rail assist bar usage for two of three residents (R30 and R75). Findings include: Review of facility policy Proper Use of Enabler Bars dated 4/17/24, indicated side rails may be used as resident mobility aids and the use of side rails as restraints, will not be used unless necessary to treat a medical symptom. Guidelines include but are not inclusive to: -An assessment will be made to determine the resident's symptoms or reason for using side rails. -Informed consent for the use of less restrictive devices will be obtained from the resident or legal representative per facility protocol. Review of Resident R30's clinical record indicated admission to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, Nursing staff personnel records, nurse training documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff received annual in-service education for one out of six nursing personnel (Registered Nurse Employee E5). Findings include: The facility In-service training policy dated 4/17/24, indicated that the facility will provide in-service training for all personnel. All mandatory in-service requirements must be completed annually as a condition of continued employment. Training topics include residents rights, abuse, neglect and exploitation, behavioral health, infection control, compliance and ethics, effective communication, and dementia management. Review of Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E5's personnel record indicated she was hired to the facility on 2/20/97. Review of Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E5's personnel record did not include annual in-services on resident rights, person centered care, communication, basic nursing skills, basic restorative services, skin and wound care, medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain medications were administered as ordered by the physician for one of of three residents (Resident R385). Findings include: A review of facility policy Medication administration dated 4/17/2024, indicated that medications are administered, as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only persons legally authorized to do so to comply with Federal Laws governing Medication Administration and in order to ensure the safe, accurate and timely administration of medications. A review of Resident R385 admission record indicated that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident R385's Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 8/2/24, indicated she had with diagnoses that included diabetes (a metabolic disorder impacting organ function related to glucose levels in the human body), chronic kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly disinfect a respiratory equipment spacer (spacer- a plastic tube with a mouthpiece on one end, allows the person more time to inhale allowing medication to enter the lungs more efficiently) prior to placing in medication cart for one of three residents (Resident R136) and failed to prevent cross contamination during a dressing change for one of three residents (Resident R90). Findings Include: Review of the Aero Chamber Z STAT manual cleaning instructions for mask and mouthpiece chambers indicate: -Soak the parts for 15 minutes in a mild solution of liquid dish detergent and lukewarm clean water. -Agitate gently. -Rinse parts in clean water. -Dishwasher safe, avoid heated dry over 158*, parts on top rack only. -Do not boil or sterilize. -Shake out excess water from the parts and allow to air dry in a vertical position. -Ensure parts are dry before reassembly. Review of facility policy Oral Inhalation Administration) reviewed 4/17/24, indicated to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, resident council meeting minutes and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence that Resident Council concerns were assigned to the appropriate department, facility responses to Resident Council concerns, and how the facility resolved the repetitive Resident Council concerns for three of three months (January, February, and March 2024). Findings include: The facility indicated they do not have a Resident Council policy. Review of the facility policy Grievances dated 8/16/23, indicated the resident has the right to voice grievances with respect to treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished. The facility actively seeks a resolution and keeps the resident appropriately apprised of its progress toward resolution. Review of Resident Council meeting minutes for the meeting on 1/15/24, indicated the following concerns: call lights not being answered on evening and night shifts, unable to find Nurse Aides (NA), they are always on their phones, have attitudes, not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and investigative documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide quality of care with an unlicensed employee providing medications to six residents. This was identified as a past non-compliance for six of six residents (Resident R1, R2 R3, R4, R5 and R6). Findings include: Quality of care is a fundamental principle that applies to all treatment and care provided to facility residents. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Review of the job description for NA (Nursing Assistant) indicated job functions to include: duties and responsibilities, administrative, committee, personnel, and specific job function, staff development, competency, safety, equipment & safety functions, financial responsibilities, customer service and resident rights. Giving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, homelike environment in five out of 12 sampled resident rooms (Residents R2, R5, R6, R7, and Resident R8). Findings include: The facility Resident environment policy stated 8/16/23, indicated that the facility will provide an environment that is safe, clean, comfortable and homelike During a tour with Housekeeping Supervisor Employee E2 on 2/13/24, starting at 11:24 a.m. the following was observed: At 11:27 a.m. Residents R5's room was observed with a large crack in the wall under her window. The crack had a white-powered substance falling out of wall. At 11:29 a.m. Residents R6's room was observed with brown spots on the floor in front of the bed. At 11:30 a.m. Residents R7's room was observed with a large black spot on the privacy curtain. At 11:31 a.m. Residents R2's room was observed with large gauges on the wall behind her oxygen concentrator. At 11:36 a.m. Residents R8's room was observed brown tile in front of his bathroom. The tile was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, observations, resident interview and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to consistently maintain functional telephone services and uphold residents' ability to communicate with individuals for two out of four observed resident phones (Resident R1 and Resident R2). Findings include: The facility Telephone policy dated 8/16/23, indicated that the resident has the right to have reasonable access to the use of a telephone where calls can be made without being overheard. It is the policy of this facility to provide every resident with an opportunity to have access to a telephone for private conversations with loved ones and friends. During an interview on 2/13/24, at 9:32 a.m. Maintenance Supervisor Employee E1 stated when asked any complaints about the phone functioning: yes, its all over the building. It is an issue. Been an issue for 2-3 months. Before, we had analogue phone lines. Now, phone call goes through the computer and all the phone extensions changed. During observations with Maintenance Supervisor Employee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to secure confidential medical information on staff computers for two out of seven medication carts (300 hall/Sub-acute and 100 hall/South). Findings include: The facility Health insurance portability and accountability act. last reviewed on 8/16/23, indicated that the facility will keep information regarding a resident's health private and confidential. This includes information on paper, fax or computer. During observations on 2/13/24, at 9:11 a.m. the 300 hall/subacute medication cart was observed with a staff computer on it. Observations found Resident R3 confidential medical information on the screen and fully exposed. No staff were observed near the medication cart During observations on 2/13/24, at 9:16 a.m. the 100 hall/South medication cart was observed with a staff computer on it. Observations found Resident R4 confidential medical information on the screen and fully exposed. No staff were observed near the medication cart During an interview on 2/13/24, at 10:46 a.m. the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-04 · tag F0836 — widespreadEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of vendor invoices, facility financial documents, as well as interviews with vendors and staff, it was determined that facility failed to pay bills in a timely manner which created a potential for an interruption of supplies and services. Findings include: 28 PA Code Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations, subsection 201.14(g), dated 7/1/23, indicated that a facility owner shall pay in a timely manner bills incurred in the operation of a facility that are not in dispute and that are for services without which the residents' health and safety are jeopardized. During an interview on 12/27/23, at 10:16 a.m., Medical Director Vendor V1 stated that he has not been paid for services provided as the facility Medical Director since July of 2023. Review of invoices dated 8/31/23, 9/30/23, 10/31/23, and 11/30/23, reveals charges related to services provided as the facility Medical Director of $3000.00 per month, totaling a past due balance of $12,000. Review of an electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-04 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of vendor invoices, facility financial documents, as well as interviews with vendors and staff, it was determined that the governing body failed to implement policies regarding the management of the operation of the facility by failing to respond to vendor invoices and failing to respond to facility requests for payment of outstanding bills. Findings include: 28 PA Code Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long Term Care Licensure Regulations, subsection 201.14(g), dated 7/1/23, indicated that a facility owner shall pay in a timely manner bills incurred in the operation of a facility that are not in dispute and that are for services without which the residents' health and safety are jeopardized. During an interview on 12/27/23, at 10:16 a.m., Medical Director Vendor V1stated that he has not been paid for services provided as the facility Medical Director since July of 2023. Review of invoices dated 8/31/23, 9/30/23, 10/31/23, and 11/30/23, reveals charges related to services provided as the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility document review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facilityfailed to provide an ongoing activity program to meet the needs of the residents by failing to respond to facility requests for supplies and by failing to respond vendor invoices which caused entertainment activities to be canceled and refusals of entertainers to return to the facility. Findings include: Review of an Activity Entertainer Invoice dated 6/4/23, revealed Entertainment Vendor V9 provided vocal entertainment on 6/2/23, with a charge of $125.00. This invoice included an approved purchase order number. On 12/31/23, at 8:59 a.m. the Activities Director Employee E5 confirmed that this vendor has not been paid. [Vendor V9] has been coming to our building for years with the residents. He told me he will never come back because they never paid him. Review of an Activity Entertainer Invoice dated 7/5/23, revealed Entertainment Vendor V10 provided musical entertainment on 7/5/23, with a charge of $150.00. This invoice included an approved purchase order number. On 12/27/23, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-13 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of infection control documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have one or more individuals serving as the Infection Preventionist for seven of twelve months (November 2022, December 2022, January 2023, June 2023, July 2023, August 2023, and September 2023). Findings include: Review of the Pennsylvania Department of Health notice PAHAN #626, dated 2/15/22, PAHAN #663, dated 10/4/22, PAHAN #694, dated 5/11/23, indicated long-term care facilities should Assign one or more individuals with training in IPC (infection preventions and control) to provide on-site management of the IPC program. This should be a full-time role for at least one person in facilities that have more than 100 residents. During an interview on 10/10/23, at 9:38 a.m. Regional Clinical Consultant Employee E5 stated, the current Infection Preventionist is in the training process. Myself and another Regional Clinical Consultant have been overseeing it but we do not work full time at this building. During an interview on 10/11/23, at 11:30 a.m. the Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-13 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident was developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission for 16 of 19 new admissions in the past 30 days. Findings include: A review of facility policy MDS/RAI/Care Planning last reviewed 8/16/23, indicated to ensure coordination and implementation of each resident's plan of care, individualized for each residents strengths, problems, and needs. A review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.21(a) - Baseline Care Plans states that the facility must develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meets professional standards of quality care and the baseline care plan must be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission. A review of the facility's new admissions within the past 30 days failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly and securely store medications in two out of four medications carts (South and Subacute). Findings include: A review of facility policy Storage of Medications last reviewed 8/16/23, indicated that medications are stored in a safe, secure, and orderly manner in accordance with federal and state regulations and facility policies. Medications are stored in the containers in which they are received. Drug containers having soiled, illegible, worn, makeshift, incomplete, damaged, or missing labels are relabeled before storing. Each resident is assigned a cubicle or drawer to prevent the possibility of a drug for one resident being given to another. During an observation on 10/11/23, at 9:28 a.m. of the South medication cart indicated the following medications stored in one compartment without individual packaging or separation from other residents medications: - Resident R60's Basaglar pen (prefilled pen to inject long acting insulin under the skin) and NovoLog…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy the facility failed to make certain that all residents had the access/ability to file a grievance, that the facility documented a residents grievance, and that the facility had a policy and procedure that met federal guidelines for one of six residents (Resident R71). Findings include: Review of facility policy Concern Procedure- Resident/Family dated 8/16/23, indicated : When a staff member becomes aware of a resident or family concern, a Resident/Family Concern Form will be completed. The original will be forwarded to the Social Services Director. Copies of the concern will be provided to the appropriate departments for resolution. Responses and/or resolutions to the concern will be returned from those departments to the Social Services Director. All responses to Resident/family concern forms will be forwarded to the Social Service Director within five (5) days of receipt of the initial concern. Review of the facility policy Grievances dated 8/16/23, indicated This facility will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from neglect by not providing a two-person transfer per physician's order for one of six sampled residents (Resident R13). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse Protection last reviewed 8/16/23, indicated that residents have the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Neglect is defined as the failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness. Neglect refers to failure through inattentiveness, carelessness, or omission to provide timely, consistent, safe, adequate, and appropriate services, treatment of care, including but not limited to nutrition, medication, therapies, and activities of daily living. The absence of reasonable accommodations of individual needs and preferences…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and facility investigative documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from misappropriation (the act of stealing something that you have been trusted to care of and using it for yourself) of medications for one of five residents reviewed (Residents R216). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Abuse Reporting and Investigation dated 8/16/23, indicated types of abuse include verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, involuntary seclusion, mental abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property. Review of admission record indicated Resident R216 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/22/22, indicated the diagnoses of anemia (the blood doesn ' t have enough healthy red blood cells), high blood pressure, and diabetes (too much sugar in the blood). Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, investigation documentations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation to rule out neglect and/or abuse for one of six sampled residents (Resident R13). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse Reporting and Investigation last reviewed 8/16/23, indicated that the facility will thoroughly investigate all reports of suspected or alleged abuse, neglect, or exploitation. Review of facility policy Abuse Protection last reviewed 8/16/23, indicated neglect is defined as the failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness. Neglect refers to failure through inattentiveness, carelessness, or omission to provide timely, consistent, safe, adequate, and appropriate services, treatment of care, including but not limited to nutrition, medication, therapies, and activities of daily living. The absence of reasonable accommodations of individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy and clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that resident assessments were accurate for three of 13 residents (Resident R28, R51, and R85). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (periodic assessments of resident care needs), dated October 2018, and updated October 2019, indicated that Section C: Cognitive Patterns, Question C0100 Should Brief Interview for Mental Status Be Conducted? (BIMS) should be coded as 0 if the resident is rarely/never understood, and that it should be coded 1, and the BIMS assessment should be completed if the resident is at least sometimes understood. Further review of the RAI indicated under Coding Tips rules for stopping the BIMS before it is complete: 1. All responses up to this point have been nonsensical (making no sense), 2. there has been no verbal or written response to any of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to implement comprehensive care plans for one of six clinical records reviewed (Resident R98). Findings include: Review of facility policy MDS/RAI/Care Planning, dated 8/16/23, indicated that the facility is to Develop a written plan of care individualized for each resident, which identifies through an assessment process, his/her strengths, problems, needs. Resident R98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R98 MDS (minimum data set - a brief periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 8/29/23, indicated that Resident R98 had the diagnosis of sepsis ( when an infection you already have triggers a chain reaction throughout your body) , UTI (infection in any part of the urinary system), and bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the bloodstream). Review of Resident R98 clinical record physician orders indicated that resident had a foley catheter, IV Medications, PICC Line, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff interview the facility failed to update and revise care plans for one of six residents reviewed (R98). Findings include: Resident R98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R98 MDS (minimum data set - a brief periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 8/29/23, indicated that Resident R98 had the diagnosis of sepsis ( when an infection you already have triggers a chain reaction throughout your body) , UTI (infection in any part of the urinary system), and bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the bloodstream). During an interview on 10/ 10/23, at 12:28 p.m. Resident R98 indicated that their teeth had been removed and the they received dentures. Review of Resident R98 clinical record showed a care plan for dental care. Additional review of the clinical record care plans failed to include information on dentures or on denture care. During an interview on 10/13/23, at 10:01 a.m. Employee E1 RNAC (Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator) confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to assess, stage and size a residents wound at admit for one of four Residents reviewed (Resident R105). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnosis of UTI ( urinary tract infection - an infection in any part of the urinary system), and unspecified intellectual disabilities (deficits of adaptive functioning that result in failure to meet developmental and sociocultural standards). Review of the MDS (minimum data set - a brief periodic assessment of the resident needs) dated 9/19/23, indicated the diagnosis remained current. Review of the clinical record progress notes dated 6/23/23, indicated Resident R105 has a DTI on buttock. Further review of the clinical record failed to show any assessment, staging of wound until 7/23. During an interview on 10/13/23, at 1:42 p.m. Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-09-20 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) for two of two resident hospital transfers (Residents R41 and R107). Findings Include: Review of the facility Transfer Notice of Bed Hold Policy and Readmission policy dated 4/17/24, indicated the facility will provide written information to the resident or legally responsible party that specifies the bed-hold policy prior or at the time of transfer to a hospital or other anticipated temporary leave. Review of Resident R41's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease without heart failure (long-term condition that develops over many years in people who have high blood pressure), dementia (the loss of cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-08-08 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, resident fund account statements and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to convey resident funds and closed account upon discharge or death in a timely manner for one of five resident records reviewed. (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)§483.10(f)(10)(v) indicated conveyance upon discharge, eviction, or death. Upon the discharge, eviction, or death of a resident with a personal fund deposited with the facility, the facility must convey within 30 days the resident's funds, and a final accounting of those funds, to the resident, or in the case of death, the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate, in accordance with State law. The facility Accounting and Records policy dated 4/17/24, indicated monies due residents should be credited to their respective bank accounts within an appropriate timeframe. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIMESTONE ENTERPRISES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 67% | since 03/19/2024 |
| GESTETNER, ELLIOTT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/19/2024 |
| MOSKOWITZ, YISROEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 30% | since 01/22/2025 |
| GEM FAMILY 2020 NGCG NEVADA TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 67% | since 03/19/2024 |
| CAPITAL FUNDING LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 03/19/2024 |
| DOSHI, BHAVANK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| EARDLEY, ALEXIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| GESTETNER, COLEV | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| CAM-ELM COMPANY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| MTL HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| OCEAN FISCAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| SMV CORAOPOLIS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| SMV INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS I-B LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| SMV INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS II LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| SMV INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS III LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| SMV INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS IV LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| SMV PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| SMV REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| UB LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| COHEN, CHAYA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| KROHN, SIMCHA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| SCHRON, AVI | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $520K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395620. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.