Laurel View Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 57.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.92 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.32 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 17).Findings include:A comprehensive MDS assessment for Resident 17, dated February 24, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance with daily care needs, received insulin, and had diagnoses that included diabetes.Physician's orders for Resident 17, dated February 14, 2026, included an order for the resident to receive 11 units insulin aspart 100 units/milliliter (ml) at 7:00 a.m. daily if blood glucose is less than 80 mg/dL give 4 units, and if blood glucose is less than 70 mg/dL hold insulin recheck 1 hour after eating and administer insulin per sliding scale order.Physician's orders for Resident 17, dated February 13, 2026, included an order for the resident to receive 9 units insulin aspart 100 units/ml at 11:00 a.m. daily if blood glucose is less than 80 mg/dL give 3 units, and if blood glucose is less than 70 mg/dL…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications and that non-pharmacological interventions were implemented prior to initiation of an antipsychotic medication for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 10) for unnecessary medications.Findings included: The facility's policy regarding psychotropic medications (any medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior), dated October 15, indicated that psychotropic medications are not used unless clinically indicated, are prescribed at the lowest effective dose, and are subject to gradual dose reduction and behavioral interventions in accordance with federal regulations and informed consent will be obtained per state law. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 10, dated April 8, revealed that the resident is cognitively impaired, requires assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 5).Findings include: A Quarterly Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated April 16, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was sometimes understood and could sometimes understand others, and required assistance from staff with daily care needs. A physician's order for Resident 5, dated November 28, 2025, included orders for the resident to maintain a 1500cc fluid restriction. A physician's order for Resident 5 dated January 21, 2026, revealed that the resident's humidifier was no longer to be filled with distilled water due to the resident drinking the water. A nursing note for Resident 5 dated, January 22, 2026, revealed that the resident has been attempting to get water where she can in bathrooms and was observed drinking the water from her humidifier. A nursing note for Resident 5 dated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, facility policies, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an assessment was completed by a professional (registered) nurse after a change in condition occurred for two out of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 2, 8). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The facility's policy for change in condition, dated October 21, 2025, indicated that if a resident has a change in condition, it is the registered nurse's responsibility to observe, record and update the physician regarding that resident's altered condition. A comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders regarding medication administration were followed for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 17, and 33).Findings include: A comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) dated February 24, 2026, for Resident 17 revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was rarely understood and rarely understood others, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, received insulin and had a diagnosis of diabetes. Physician's orders for Resident 17, dated February 14, 2026, included an order for the resident to receive Novolog flexpen insulin aspart 100unit/milliliter and Inject 11 units subcutaneously at 7:00 a.m. and if blood glucose is <80 mg/dL inject 8 units and if blood sugar <70 mg/dL to hold insulin and obtain another blood glucose in 1 hour after meals and to administer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that interventions were in place as ordered for two of 24 residents reviewed, a left palm guard to reduce contractures and pain and prevent skin breakdown (Resident 4) and a left hand towel roll to prevent contractures (Resident 33). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding splints and braces dated October 1, 2025, indicated that the purpose was to prevent or reduce contractures, maintain proper joint alignment, reduce pain and/or promote skin integrity.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated April 3, 2026, indicated that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for care, had diagnoses that included a stroke which resulted in a decrease in hand muscle function and an increase in weakness of the left arm/hand. Resident 4's care plan, dated October 1, 2025, indicated that the resident had impaired left side…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment in the refrigerator for the storage of controlled drugs (medications with the potential to be abused) in one of two medication rooms reviewed. Findings include:Observations in the facility's main medication room on May 20, 2026, at 10:12 a.m. revealed one small, refrigerator containing one bottle of liquid Ativan (a controlled medication used to treat anxiety). The liquid Ativan was not in a secured, permanently affixed locked compartment. The locked compartment was affixed to the shelf, but the shelf was easily removed from the refrigerator. Interview with Registered Nurse 5 at the time of the observation confirmed that the shelf containing the locked container was removable from the refrigerator.Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 20, 2026, at 2:54 p.m. confirmed the bottle of liquid Ativan was not in a permanently affixed compartment and should have been.28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy Services.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated April 29, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for daily care tasks, and had a history of falls. A nursing note for Resident 3, dated May 19, 2025, at 4:47 p.m. revealed that it was a follow-up to a fall earlier in the day, and the resident was now complaining of shoulder pain. Facility investigation documents for Resident 3 revealed that the resident fell on May 19, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. and had a skin tear on the back of the left hand. The investigation document included an assessment of the resident's fall and injury; however, there was no documented evidence of this assessment in the resident's clinical record. Interview with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to bowel protocols for two of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 41) and failed to follow physician's orders for medication administration for one of 29 resident (Resident 27). Findings include: A facility policy for the bowel protocol, dated November 2021, indicated that on admission the following bowel protocol will be ordered for all residents to prevent constipation unless otherwise specified by the admitting physician. Give 30 milliliters (ml) of Milk of Magnesia (MOM - an oral laxative) one time if there is not bowel movement after 3 days. If Milk of Magnesia is ineffective, on day 4, give a 10 milligram (mg) Dulcolax suppository (a laxative inserted rectally). If both Milk of Magnesia and Dulcolax suppository are ineffective, on day 5 give a Fleets enema (a liquid inserted rectally to stimulate a bowel movement) unless contraindicated. Monitor the use of the bowel protocol. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of correction for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending May 23, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending April 16, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies related to a failure to follow physician's orders, provide proper care of urinary catheters, and nutrition maintenance. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding following physician's orders, cited during survey ending May 23, 2024, revealed that the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FRIENDS SERVICES FOR THE AGING — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 80 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA