No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Dubois Nursing Home

212 S. Eighth St., Dubois, PA 15801 · Non profit - Corporation · 140 certified beds · (814) 375-9100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 375-9100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)3 actual-harm citations2 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$17,225 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $17,225 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-10)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
529 Sunflower Dr · (814) 375-0600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
209 Beaver Dr · (814) 371-5827 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Martin0.7 mi
22 Hoover Ave · (814) 371-7299 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Beaver Meadow Wky · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.4%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.7%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.1%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.2%10.8%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.7%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.3%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.2%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.7%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.0%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.0%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table29.3%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine50.0%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.8%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.4%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.751.621.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.601.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 108 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
39.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 39.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.5%CMS range 39.1–54.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.8–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge39.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge29.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified88.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened17.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.3%CMS range 6.1–13.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.98
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
57.9%
Total nursing turnover
31.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 129.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.552 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-30)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-15)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-04-30 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent physical and verbal behaviors, and/or failed to develop and implement new interventions to address ongoing physical and verbal behaviors for two of 44 residents reviewed (Residents 8, 68) resulting in psychosocial harm for one resident (Resident 68). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 8, dated March 31, 2026, indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, had verbal behaviors directed at others 1-3 days, and had diagnoses that included dementia. A behavior care plan, most recently revised April 3, 2026, revealed that staff were to identify triggers and what de-escalates behavior; address and anticipate her needs; monitor danger to herself and others; offer stuffed animal when she is agitated; and to use activities to assist with behaviors. An admission MDS assessment for Resident 68, dated January 15, 2026 revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-01-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to enter a new resident's physician's orders into the electronic health record which caused the resident to miss two doses of insulin resulting in hospitalization for elevated blood sugars, for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include:The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was responsible for assessing human responses and plans, implementing nursing care, analyzing/comparing data with the norm in determining care needs, and carrying out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals.admission paperwork for Resident 3, dated December 19, 2025, indicated that she was a diabetic with diabetic ulcers and that her blood sugar prior to leaving the hospital that day was 182. A nursing note for Resident 3, dated December 19, 2025, indicated that she was admitted from the hospital at 5:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include:admission paperwork for Resident 3, dated December 19, 2025, indicated that she was a diabetic with diabetic ulcers and that her blood sugar prior to leaving the hospital that day was 182. A nursing note for Resident 3, dated December 19, 2025, indicated that she was admitted from the hospital at 5:30 p.m. and that her physician's orders for medications were reviewed with the provider at 6:06 p.m.Physician's orders, dated December 19, 2025, for Resident 3 included orders for the resident to receive insulin Lispro with sliding scale coverage three times per day with meals; insulin Lispro with sliding scale coverage nightly at bedtime; insulin lispro 7 units daily before breakfast; insulin lispro 3 units two times a day before lunch and supper;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of investigation documents and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2), resulting in a fall with fracture. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (required assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated March 1, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs including transfers, and had diagnoses that included dementia and high blood pressure. A care plan, dated November 15, 2023, revealed that the resident was to be transferred by two staff and a front-wheeled walker. A nursing note for Resident 2, dated March 27, 2024, at 4:30 p.m., indicated that the resident had a fall in the bathroom. She had complaints of left lower extremity pain. The resident had a left lower extremity deformity and a lump to her left forehead. The physician was notified and ordered the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2024-01-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, investigation reports, clinical records, and staff education records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse or neglect caused by staff failing to properly secure a resident in a motor vehicle, which led to a resident sustaining a facial fracture for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2). This deficiency will be cited as past noncompliance. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding resident abuse and neglect, dated January 1, 2023, indicated that each resident has the right to be free from abuse and neglect. The facility's policy for vehicle safety and management, dated January 1, 2023, indicated that the facility will do everything possible to prevent accidents and is committed to providing a safe environment for all employees and residents. A nursing note for Resident 2, dated December 16, 2023, indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility, was alert to person and place, and had diagnoses that included a fall with rib fractures and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that non pharmalogical interventions were attempted prior to the administration of a psychotropic medication for one of 44 residents reviewed (Resident 75).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding use pf psychotropic medications, February 27, 2026, indicated that psychotropic medications were used to treat the resident's medical symptoms and maximize the resident's functional potential and well-being while minimizing the hazards associated with psychoactive drug side effects.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 75, dated March 13, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was taking an anti-anxiety medication, and had a diagnosis of anxiety. A care plan, dated March 12. 2026, indicated that staff were to attempt non-pharmalogical interventions such as diversional activities, rest, snacks, etc., prior to administering as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for three of 44 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 8, 11) and failed to ensure that laboratory test results for monitoring anticoagulant medications were reported to the physician which resulted in a delay in treatment for one of 44 residents reviewed (Resident 123). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated February 6, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for daily care needs, received insulin (medication that lowers blood sugar levels), and had diagnoses that included diabetes. Physician's orders for Resident 6, dated December 10, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive Novolog Solution 100 unit/ml subcutaneously, according to a sliding scale (the amount of insulin is based on the result of a fingerstick blood sugar test) two times a day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to flush an intravenous (IV) line as ordered by the physician for one of 44 residents reviewed (Resident 134).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding catheter (a tube placed in a vein that can be used to deliver fluids and/or medications) insertion and care, dated February 7, 2026, indicated that midline and central line access devices were to be flushed to maintain patency; to prevent mixing of incompatible medications and solutions; and to ensure entire dose of solution or medication was administered into the venous system. A 10 milliliter (ml) saline flush (a method used to clean a catheter of blood or medication) was to be administered before and after each medication that was infused.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 134, dated March 18, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, received an antibiotic, and IV medications.A nursing note, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free from significant medication errors for two of 44 residents reviewed (Residents 19, 145).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated February 27, 2026, indicated that the facility was to administer medications in accordance with written orders, including dosage, frequency, and parameters.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 19, dated April 20, 2026, revealed that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, needed extensive assistance for daily care needs, had a multi-drug resistant organism, and had pressure ulcers.Physician's orders for Resident 19, dated April 21, 2026, included an order for the resident to receive 500 milligrams (mg) of Cefadroxil (an antibiotic) every twelve hours for an infection until May 1, 2026.A review of Resident 19's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April 2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at proper temperatures. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding meal service, dated February 27, 2026, revealed that food temperatures at point of service to the resident would be monitored according to palatability and maintained according to the guidelines set forth by the Food Safety Guidelines of the Food and Drug Association which state hot foods served to the resident would be palatable served at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or higher. Interview with Resident 2 on April 27, 2026, at 11:17 a.m. revealed that the food was terrible tasting, cold and he did not like it at all. Interview with Resident 70 on April 27, 2026 at 2:23 p.m. revealed that the resident disliked the food and that it was usually cold. He stated that he does not ask the staff to reheat it because they do not have time. Interview with Resident 84 on April 27, 2026, at 11:45 a.m. revealed that the food was not always warm.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a review of cleaning schedules, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions.Findings include:Observations in the kitchen's food prep/ tray line area on April 27, 2026, at 9:38 a.m. revealed that there were three ceiling vents that had an accumulation of dust and rust colored buildup. One ceiling tile was covered with a rust colored buildup.A review of the preventative maintenance schedule for dietary, dated 2026, revealed that there was no documented evidence that the vents or ceiling tile were cleaned or inspected until April 27, 2026.Interview with the Dietary Manager on April 27, 2026, at 9:38 a.m. confirmed that the vents needed cleaned and that maintenance was responsible for cleaning them.28 Pa. Code 211.6(f) Dietary Services.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of established infection control guidelines and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for one of 44 residents reviewed (Resident 145).Findings include:CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. CMS updated its infection prevention and control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs for one of 44 residents reviewed (Resident 11) Findings include:The facility's policy for care planning, dated February 27, 2026, indicated that all residents will have an interim, comprehensive, and ongoing plan of care, which will be developed to outline and provide directions and interventions to provide care for the residents. It must be individualized, realistic, functional, and measurable at time frame for completion. Physician's orders for Resident 11, dated September 12, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive Humalog Injection Solution 100 unit/ml subcutaneously, according to a sliding scale three times a day (scheduled for 6:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m.). The sliding scale included giving 0 units of insulin for a blood sugar of 70-150 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dl), 1 unit for a blood sugar of 151-199 mg/dl, 2 units…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise residents' care plans for two of 44 residents reviewed (Residents 5, 86). Findings include: The facility's policy for care planning, dated February 27, 2026, indicated that care plans will be reviewed and revised as necessary by the interdisciplinary team at least quarterly or more often as changes occur.A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated March 31, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and required assistance with care needs.Physician's orders for Resident 5, dated March 24, 2026, included an order for the resident to receive 100 mg of Macrobid (an antibiotic) every day for urinary tract infection with the last dose March 31, 2026. A care plan for Resident 5, dated March 30, 2026, indicated that the resident was taking an antibiotic for UTI,There was no documented evidence as of April 30, 2026 that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received assistive devices to prevent accidents for one of 44 residents reviewed (Resident 75). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 75, dated March 13, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, used a walker, required extensive assistance from staff for care, had a history of falls, and had diagnoses that included arthritis, muscle weakness, and an abnormal gait and mobility. Physician's orders, dated March 7, 2026, included orders for the resident to transfer with one assist and a front wheeled walker. A care plan, dated April 1, 2026, revealed the resident was at risk for falls and staff were to keep the resident's call bell within reach and encourage her to use it for assistance as needed. A fall investigation, dated April 28, 2026, at 9:25 a.m. revealed the resident was found on the floor in her room after she attempted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to change an indwelling urinary catheter as ordered by the physician for one of 44 residents reviewed (Resident 137).Findings include:The facility policy for urinary catheter care, dated February 27, 2026, indicated that changing indwelling catheters or drainage bags at routine, fixed intervals, was not recommended. Rather it was suggested to change catheters and drainage bags based on clinical indications such as infection, obstruction, or when the closed system was compromised.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 137, dated February 17, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for her daily care needs, had an indwelling urinary catheter, and had diagnoses that included neurogenic bladder (a lack of bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord, or nerve condition) and a urinary tract infection. Physician's orders for Resident 137, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of laboratory test results for one of 44 residents reviewed (Resident 123).Findings include: The facility policy for laboratory tests, dated February 27, 2016, indicated that the physician would be notified immediately if a test was obtained to monitor the blood level of a medication and the level was reported as high (above therapeutic range) or toxic, the nurse will notify the physician promptly and will not give the next dose until the situation has been reviewed with the physician.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 123, dated February 24, 2026, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired, received anticoagulant medication (used to thin blood), and had a diagnosis of heart failure. The resident's care plan, dated March 3, 2026, indicated that he was at risk for bleeding due to anticoagulant therapy, and ordered labs were to be scheduled, results…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include: Review of facility policy for oxygen administration by nasal cannula or mask dated February 27, 2026, indicated that residents who require oxygen will have a physician's order which includes the oxygen flow rate. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated assessment of the resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5 dated January 22, 2026, indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had diagnoses that included heart failure, and was receiving supplemental oxygen. Physician's orders for Resident 5 dated February 13, 2024, indicated that the resident was to receive oxygen at three Liters per minute (L/min) via nasal cannula (a lightweight, flexible tube with two small prongs that sits in the nostrils to deliver supplemental oxygen).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 7).Findings include:CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's - bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics, and these antibiotics can no longer be used to control or kill the bacteria), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with proper colostomy care for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 4).Findings include: The facility's policy regarding colostomy care (care for an artificial opening in the bowel), dated January 31, 2025, colostomy care will be provided per physician orders to provide the stoma with good skin care and check the condition of the stoma and surrounding skin. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4 dated November 30, 2025,indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had a diagnosis of sepsis (infection in the bloodstream) and had an ostomy (a surgically created opening in the abdomen- part of the body between the chest and the hips). A nurse's note for Resident 4, dated November 24, 2025, at 6:47 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as observations staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate treatment and care for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC - a thin tube that's inserted through a vein in your arm and passed through to the larger veins near your heart) for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: A facility policy for the care and maintenance of PICC and midline catheters (a small flexible tube inserted through a vein in your arm that is shorter than a PICC) dated January 31, 2025, indicated that dressing must stay clean, dry and intact. Dressings are to be changed every 5-7 days and as needed when wet, soiled, or not intact. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4 dated November 30, 2025,indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had a diagnosis of sepsis (infection in the bloodstream) and had an ostomy (a surgically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated November 27, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with daily care needs, and had medical diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of rectum. Physician's orders for Resident 1 dated December 11, 2025, included orders for the Registered Nurse to disconnect chemotherapy (medications used to treat cancer) pump, flush Medi port (an implanted device under the skin used to provide long term access to a vein for medications), and de-access the port every other Friday. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed no documented evidence that a Registered Nurse disconnected his chemotherapy pump, flushed the Medi port and de-accessed the port on December 12, 2025, or on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment in residents' rooms for 10 of 14 residents reviewed (Residents 3 and 7).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding homelike environment, dated January 31, 2025, indicated that the purpose was to provide residents were provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible.Observations of Resident 3 and 7's shared bathroom on November 20, 2025, at 11:13 a.m., 4:15, and 4:45 p.m. revealed that there was a brown/yellow removable substance on the toilet seat, on the metal safety rail, and there was brown removable substance around the inside of the bowl of the toilet.Interview with the Director of Housekeeping Services on November 20, 2025, at 4:45 p.m. revealed that the rooms were cleaned daily and COVID positive rooms to be last. She confirmed that the above residents' shared bathroom needed cleaning and indicated that staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for dressing changes were followed for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings include:A facility policy regarding physician orders, dated January 1, 2025, revealed that the licensed nurse would complete the physician order how it was written regarding timing and frequency.A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated August 4, 2025, indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, could sometimes understand, was sometimes understood, required assistance from staff for all care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia.A nursing note dated August 19, 2025, indicated that staff found a large skin tear. Resident 2 was assessed by a registered nurse and identified a seven centimeter (cm) by nine cm skin tear with bruising noted on the right forearm.Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's environment remained free of accident hazards by failing to ensure care-planned interventions were in place for one of 49 residents reviewed (Resident 17) who were at risk for falls, and failed to ensure that other residents' environment remained free of accident hazards from a resident with aggressive behaviors for one of 49 residents reviewed (Resident 93). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding fall prevention and management, dated January 31, 2025, indicated that the facility will identify those residents at risk for falls upon admission, readmission, and quarterly and provide appropriate interventions to modify and/or compensate for risk factors. The [NAME], point of care and point of care tasks will reflect all safety devices utilized as ordered. The care plan will be updated to reflect resident-specific safety needs and interventions. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical record, as well as and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for two of 49 residents reviewed (Residents 38, 93) who had dementia. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding dementia care, dated January 31, 2025, indicated that residents living with dementia may experience agitation, aggression, distress or psychosis. Consideration should be given to non-pharmacological interventions prior to instituting a pharmacological treatment. It is the intent to use the lowest effective dose and utilize for the shortest time possible. A significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 38, dated February 21, 2025, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, exhibited verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others (e.g., threatening others, screaming at others, cursing at others) which occurred one to three days, and had a diagnosis which included Alzheimer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 49 residents reviewed (Resident 62). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 62, dated March 11, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance for care needs, and was taking an opioid medication (medications with the potential to be abused used to treat pain). Physician's orders for Resident 62, dated January 27, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 50 milligrams (mg) of Tramadol (a narcotic pain medication) every six hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. Review of the controlled drug record (a form that accounts for each tablet/pill/dose of a controlled drug) for Resident 62, dated February, March and April, 2025, revealed that a 50 mg tablet of Tramadol was signed out on February 22 at 7:00 p.m.; March 1 at 7:22 p.m.;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan for three of 49 residents reviewed (Residents 26, 48, 110). Findings include: A comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 26, dated March 24, 2025, indicated that the resident was alert and oriented, had diagnoses that included diabetes, and was on a mechanically altered, therapeutic diet. Resident 26's care plan, dated March 24, 2025, revealed that it did not include any information or interventions related to the resident's nutritional needs. An interview with Resident 26 on May 12, 2025, at 9:31 a.m. revealed that she was not happy with the food choices she received and that she was not offered a snack at night, even though she was a diabetic. An interview with the Dietician on May 15, 2025, at 8:30 a.m. confirmed that Resident 26's care plan did not include anything regarding the resident's nutritional status and that it should have. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for two of 49 residents reviewed (Residents 62, 126). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 62, dated March 11, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance for care needs, was taking an antipsychotic medication (medications used to treat mental health disorders), and had diagnoses that included dementia. A nursing note for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were provided as ordered by the physician for one of 49 residents reviewed (Resident 62). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 62, dated March 11, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance for care needs, and had diagnoses that included hypertension. Physician's orders for Resident 62, dated April 30, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 12.5 milligrams (mg) of metoprolol tartrate (treats hypertension) twice daily for hypertension. The medication was to be held if the resident's systolic blood pressure (the top number of a blood pressure reading) was 110 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or less, or if the heart rate was less than 60 beats per minute. Physician's orders for Resident 62, dated April 8, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 6.25 mg of metoprolol tartrate twice daily for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper care for indwelling urinary catheters for three of 49 residents reviewed who had an indwelling urinary catheter (Residents 55, 59, 106). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible catheter used to drain urine from the bladder into a drainage collection bag) management, dated January 31, 2025, indicated to properly position the drainage bag below the level of the bladder to facilitate urine flow and avoid allowing the drainage bag or tubing to touch the floor. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 55, dated April 17, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood, could usually understand others, and had an indwelling urinary catheter. A care plan for the resident, dated January 10, 2025, revealed that the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter, and staff was to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to flush a peripherally-inserted central catheter (PICC, a long, thin tube that is inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart), and a midline (a thin soft tube that's inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to where the tip is at or near armpit level) as ordered by the physician for one of 49 residents reviewed (Resident 96). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding flushing central venous and midline catheters, dated January 31, 2025, indicated to flush catheters at regular intervals to maintain patency. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 96, dated March 31, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with care needs, received intravenous medications (medications delivered through a tube placed in a vein) while a resident, and had a diagnosis of anemia. Physician's orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of nurse aides' dates of hire and their most recent performance review dates, it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual nurse aide performance evaluations for two of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aides 6, 7). Findings include: A list of nurse aides provided by the facility revealed that based on their months and days of hire, an annual performance evaluation was due in November 2024 for Nurse Aide 6 and in January 2025 for Nurse Aide 7. However, there was no documented evidence that annual performance evaluations were completed as required for Nurse Aides 6 and 7. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 14, 2025, at 12:51 confirmed that she could provide no evidence that annual performance evaluations were completed as required for Nurse Aides 6 and 7. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and information provided by the facility, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items at appetizing temperatures. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding temperatures for safe food handling, dated January 31, 2024, revealed that the temperatures of all food items will be taken and properly recorded prior to service of each meal. All hot food items must be cooked to appropriate internal temperatures, held and served at a temperature of at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F). All cold food items must be stored and served at a temperature of 41 degrees F or below. An interview with Resident 51 on May 12, 2025, at 1:10 p.m. indicated that his meals are often cold when his tray arrives. His room was toward the end of the hall and he indicated that it is often one of the last trays delivered. Observations of the lunch meal service in the main kitchen on May 13, 2024, revealed that the second north unit cart containing a test tray left the main kitchen at 12:30 p.m. and arrived on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending June 27, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending May 15, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies related to failure to develop and implement comprehensive care plans, failure to provide quality of care, failure to provide a safe environment that is free of accident hazards, failure to provide appropriate treatment and services for residents with dementia, and failure to maintain compliance with the regulation regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain their infection prevention and control program for hand hygiene during wound care for one of 49 residents reviewed (Resident 59). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding hand hygiene, dated January 31, 2025, indicated that hand hygiene is an important infection control measure to prevent illness in skilled nursing homes, and that hands should be sanitized or washed before and after the use of gloves. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 59, dated March 31, 2025, indicated that the resident was understood and able to understand others. Physician's orders for Resident 59, dated May 7, 2025, included an order to cleanse the right heel surgical wound thoroughly with Vashe (a wound cleanser) and gauze. Apply silver calcium alginate (a type of silver infused wound dressing) on the wound bed, then cover with an ABD and wrap with kerlix and tape;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and cleaning schedules/documents, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that essential kitchen equipment was maintained in a safe operating condition. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding routine stovetop cleaning, dated January 31, 2025, indicated that in order to keep all equipment at optimal levels of functioning and cleanliness, a routine cleaning schedule would be followed. Observations of the kitchen stove top on May 12, 2025, at 9:46 a.m. and May 13, 2025, at 8:38 a.m. and 1:37 p.m., revealed that there was a thick accumulation of black grease on and around four out of six stove top burners. These burners were located next to the grill area on the stovetop. Review of the kitchen cleaning schedule for April and May 2025 indicated that the stovetop was to be cleaned monthly. Interview with the Dietary Manager on May 14, 2025, at 11:08 a.m. confirmed that there was a large accumulation of heavy grease on and around four of the stovetop burners. She indicated that on April 1,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's responsible party was notified about a resident requiring oxygen for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding notification, dated January 25, 2024, revealed that staff will inform the resident's responsible party when there is a significant change in the resident's care or condition timely. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated August 8, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and required assistance from staff for daily care needs. A nursing note for Resident 2, dated August 11, 2024, revealed that the resident was having a hard time breathing and was coughing harshly. Staff applied oxygen for his comfort. A nursing note for Resident 2, dated August 12, 2024, revealed that the resident's family arrived and were concerned that he was wearing oxygen, and they had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs for three of 40 residents reviewed (Residents 50, 62, 101). Findings include: The facility's policy for care planning, dated January 25, 2024, indicated that all residents will have an interim, comprehensive, and ongoing plan of care, which will be developed and reviewed by the interdisciplinary team and resident. The plan of care is a working tool and requires changes as needed to meet the residents needs. The resident is to be viewed as a whole to develop a blueprint for care. Unique characteristics and needs are to drive the process. It must be individualized, realistic, functional, and measurable at time frame for completion. All goals are to be related directly to the problem. It is to outline and provide directions to provide care for the resident to meet the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise residents' care plans for five of 40 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 10, 22, 48, 105). Findings include: The facility's policy for care planning, dated January 25, 2024, indicated that the plan of care is a working tool and requires changes as needed to meet the residents' needs. The plan of care will also be reviewed and updated as needed during the change of status meeting. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated March 28, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, able to understand others, required assistance with care needs, had two Stage 4 pressure ulcers (pressure wound with full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle), had complaints of pain rated a 5 of 10 on a pain scale of 0-10, and took routine and as-needed pain medication. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and facility investigation reports, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an environment that was free of accident hazards for residents who were at risk for falls, by failing to follow physician-ordered and care-planned interventions for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 50), resulting in a fall; failed to ensure resident safety during transportation in a wheelchair for two of 40 residents reviewed (Residents 60, 80); and failed to ensure that air mattresses were assessed for potential safety hazards for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 61). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 50, dated April 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was usually understood, could usually understand others, and had diagnoses that included dementia and Parkinson's disease. A care plan for the resident, dated April 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was a high risk for falls…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to enhance each resident's dignity by failing to provide clean durable medical equipment for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 105). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 105, dated May 23, 2024, revealed that the resident was somewhat understood and could somewhat understand others, and was dependent on staff for care care needs, including feeding assistance. A care plan for Resident 105 regarding an alteration in neurological status related to a cervical 4/cervical 5 surgical repair with discectomy (surgical removal of abnormal disc in the spine) indicated that the resident had a hard cervical collar (neck brace). Physician's orders for Resident 105, dated May 17, 2024, included an order for the resident to have a hard cervical collar in place at all time until further instructions were obtained from neurosurgery. Observations on June 24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate the residents' needs by failing to ensure the proper positioning needed for eating for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 10) who had nutritional and self-care concerns. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 10, dated June 7, 2024, revealed that the resident was usually understood, could usually understand others, had a diagnosis which included dementia, had a weight loss of 5 percent or more in the last month and/or a weight loss of 10 percent or more in last six months, was not on a prescribed weight-loss regimen, and received a therapeutic diet (e.g., low salt, diabetic, low cholesterol). A care plan for the resident, dated November 16, 2020, revealed that the resident had a potential for weight fluctuations related to variable PO (by mouth) intake. The resident was to be up in a Broda chair (an adaptive wheelchair) for breakfast then laid back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for a maintenance nursing program were followed for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 22) and failed to complete wound treatments as ordered for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 48). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 22, dated May 17, 2024, revealed that the resident was sometimes understood and sometimes able to understand others and required assistance with care needs. A care plan for Resident 22, dated April 19, 2011, indicated that the resident was to receive a maintenance nursing program consisting of active range of motion (person can actively range a part of the body) to her right lower extremity and passive range of motion (person needs assistance from someone else to range a part of the body) to her left lower extremity twice daily with a.m. and p.m. care. Physician's orders for Resident 22, dated September…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that treatments for pressure ulcers were provided as ordered by the physician for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated March 28, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, able to understand others, required assistance with care needs, and had two Stage 4 pressure ulcers (pressure wound with full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle). Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated January 25, 2024, included an order for the staff to clean the wound to the left ischium with Vashe wound cleanser (used to cleanse and debride wounds) and pat dry, pack wound with a piece of silver calcium alginate (dressing used to aid in wound healing), and cover with a foam dressing daily every day shift. A review of the resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for April 2024 revealed that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were assessed and received trauma-informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers for residents with the diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a mental and behavioral disorder that develops related to a terrifying event) for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 50). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding Trauma Informed Care, dated January 25, 2024, revealed that upon admission the facility will assess each resident to ensure they receive appropriate treatment and services. A questionnaire will be utilized for each resident by the social services department to identify any trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder and to gather trigger information, so that our understanding of their traumatic events can be detailed and specific. Additional information may be obtained from the medical record, physical and emotional assessments, from the resident, from family members who have shared this information.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 30) who had dementia. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 30, dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was sometimes understood, could sometimes understand others, and had diagnosis that included dementia and Parkinson's disease. A care plan for the resident, dated [DATE], revealed that the resident has an impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes related to Parkinson's disease. Staff were to provide the resident with a homelike environment: visible clocks, a calendar, low-glare light, consistent care routines, familiar objects, and reduced sensory noise. Physician's orders for Resident 30, dated [DATE], and discontinued on [DATE], included an order for the resident to receive one 25 milligram (mg) tablet of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of correction for the State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) surveys ending July 27, 2023, and April 10, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of corrections that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility-maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending June 27, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to a failure to accommodate a resident's needs, to develop comprehensive care plans, to update residents' care plans, and to ensure that the residents' environment remained free from accident hazards. The facility's plan of correction for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of established infection control guidelines and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for one of 40 residents reviewed (Residents 17). Findings include: CDC guidance on isolation precautions for MRSA residents contained in Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. CMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$17,225 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $8,401 — penalty dated 2024-04-10
  • $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-01-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BROWN, KARENIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/01/2021
TAMI, MARKIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/25/2022
ADAMS, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/1997
ADAMSON, DENNISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2017
ALLISON, KELLIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/11/2023
CLEMENT, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/11/2023
JAVENS, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2021
JOHNSTON, KRISTIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/11/2023
KIRSCH, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2017
MARTELLA, DENNISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/11/2009
OBERLIN, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2019
CHR CONSULTING SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/25/2022
COMPLETE HEALTHCARE RESOURCES-EASTERN, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/1999

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 6%Other / private 36%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$302per resident / day
operating cost
$9,176per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$300per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395430. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next