Sapphire Care And Rehab Center
221 East Brown Street, East Stroudsburg, PA 18301 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 127 certified beds · (570) 421-6200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.0% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 52.7% | 10.8% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.6% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.1% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.2% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.9% | 25.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.8% | 17.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 47.5% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.5% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.4% | 9.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.78 | 1.62 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.67 | 1.18 | 1.80 | typical |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 127 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 134 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.2%CMS range 46.6–63.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.7–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 36.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.9%CMS range 3.4–10.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.06 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 121.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to consistently provide restorative nursing services as planned to maintain mobility for one resident out of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 115).Findings include: Review of the facility's Restorative Nursing Programs Policy, last reviewed April 30, 2026, revealed that the facility will provide maintenance and restorative services designed to maintain or improve a resident's abilities to the highest practical level. Further review of the policy revealed that all residents will receive maintenance nursing services as needed by certified nursing assistants. A review of the clinical record for Resident 115 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (brain damage that results from a lack of blood) and hemiplegia (severe weakness or paralysis) and hemiparesis (loss of muscle function on one side of the body). A review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policies, weight records, and staff and resident representative interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status to the extent possible for three of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 13, 106, and 9). Findings include: Review of the facility weight policy last reviewed on April 30, 2026, indicated that resident weights are obtained routinely to monitor parameters of nutrition. Each individual's weight will be determined upon admission or readmission to the facility, weekly for the first four weeks after admission or readmission, and monthly, or as needed. If there is a weight loss or weight gain of 5 or more pounds, a reweight will be obtained. If the weight change is accurate after the reweight, the physician, registered dietitian, and the resident's responsible party (or the resident if appropriate) will be notified. The resident's weight loss will be reviewed the following day in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-30 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to consistently provide necessary services to meet the behavioral health needs for two of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 8 and 61).Findings include: A review of the facility's Behavioral Health Services policy, last reviewed April 30, 2026, indicated it is the policy of the facility to ensure all residents receive necessary behavioral health services to assist them in reaching and maintaining their highest level of mental and psychosocial functioning. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (a condition in which excessive worry causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other areas of functioning), bipolar disorder (a mental health disorder that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), and major depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of the facility's infection control tracking logs, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a comprehensive infection control program to monitor the development and spread of infections within the facility, including tracking of infections for three out of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 50, 122, and 140).Findings include: Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Infection Control Plan, indicated as last reviewed by the facility on April 30, 2026, revealed facility leadership is committed to resident safety, providing quality healthcare services, and preventing disease transmission for those that provide support or receive services at the facility. The policy indicated the infection preventionist will provide ongoing, facility-wide outcome and process surveillance of healthcare-associated infections. The policy defined outcome surveillance as a systemic method of collecting, consolidating, and analyzing data concerning a disease or event, followed by dissemination of the information with a goal of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records. select facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make reasonable accommodations to meet one resident's assessed need for assistive positioning devices while seated in a wheelchair, for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 12). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Positioning last reviewed by the facility on April 30, 2026, revealed residents will be screened for positioning needs by Occupational Therapy or Physical Therapy. The policy indicated a positioning evaluation will be completed and included in the medical record. Treatment is to focus on providing necessary equipment and implementing a 24-hour positioning plan. The policy further required documentation of positioning recommendations, the 24-hour positioning plan, and education provided to the resident, family, or caregivers Review of clinical records revealed Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include adult…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to consistently implement planned safety interventions for one resident (Resident 61) and failed to prevent unsecured medications from being at bedside, creating a potential accident hazard, for one resident (Resident 115) out of 27 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled Elopements and Wandering Resident, last reviewed April 30, 2026, revealed it is the policy to ensure that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents and receive care in accordance with their person centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk. Residents will be assessed for risk of elopement and unsafe wandering upon admission and throughout their stay by the interdisciplinary team and monitor the implementation of interventions, respond to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical records and select policy reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide oxygen equipment in accordance with physician orders for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 7).Findings include: Review of the facility's oxygen administration and tracheostomy care policies, reviewed April 30, 2026, revealed that oxygen will be administered under the orders of a physician. The facility will provide necessary respiratory care and services, such as oxygen therapy, treatments, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy care, and suctioning. Based on resident assessment, attending physician orders, and professional standards of practice, the facility, in collaboration with the resident or resident's representatives, will develop a care plan that includes appropriate interventions for respiratory care. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 7 had diagnoses that included respiratory failure and tracheostomy (a surgically created opening in the front of the neck into the windpipe to create an airway with a tube placed in this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively monitor and implement appropriate interventions for new onset and worsening pain in accordance with physician orders and facility policy for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 105).Findings include: Review of the facility's Pain Assessment and Management policy, last reviewed April 30, 2026, revealed the purpose of the policy is to ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. The policy indicated the facility will reassess residents' pain management at established intervals for effectiveness. If re-assessment findings indicate pain is not adequately controlled, the pain management regimen and plan of care will be revised as indicated. Clinical record review revealed Resident 105 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, payor source data, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure timely and necessary dental services for one resident who is a Medicaid recipient (Resident 13) out of 27 residents reviewed.Findings include: Review of the facility's Dental Services policy, last reviewed April 30, 2026, indicated it is the policy of the facility to assist residents in obtaining routine and emergency ancillary services as needed. The policy defined routine dental services as annual inspection of the oral cavity for signs of disease, diagnosis of dental disease, dental radiographs (x-ray) as needed, dental cleaning, and limited prosthodontic procedures such as taking impressions for dentures and fitting dentures. A review of Resident 13's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and hypertension (blood pressure that is higher than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policies, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to consistently implement and enforce its smoking policy for one of three residents who smoked (Resident 88).Findings include: A review of the facility's smoking policy, reviewed April 30, 2026, revealed that the facility does not allow smoking on the premises. Residents who are alert and oriented and able to leave the facility independently may smoke only while off the property on an approved leave of absence. The policy required that cigarettes, lighters, and other smoking materials be maintained by facility staff. Residents were not permitted to keep smoking materials on their person or in their rooms. Review of an Out on Pass/Going off Grounds document acknowledged by the resident on June 1, 2026, indicated that the Out on Pass leave of absence were permitted between 5:00 AM and 9:00 PM. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 88 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from a chemical restraint and failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted and documented prior to administration of a psychotropic medication for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident CR1). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Use of Psychotropic Medication, last reviewed by the facility on February 24, 2026, revealed it is the facility policy to ensure residents do not receive psychotropic medication (medications that affect the chemical makeup of the brain and nervous system, altering mood, cognition, and perception) that are not clinically indicated and necessary to treat a specific condition documented in the medical record. The policy also indicated that behavioral and other non-pharmacological approaches (non-medication approaches used to manage symptoms or behaviors, such as environmental, behavioral, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies, clinical record review, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly notify a resident's designated representative and power of attorney of a significant change in the resident's condition and new treatment orders, for one resident out of eight sampled (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status last reviewed by the facility July 2025, indicated the facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and /or status. Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status. Except in emergencies, notifications will be made within twenty-four (24) hours of a change occurring in the resident's medical/mental condition or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide professional standards of practice for diabetes management for one resident out of 29 sampled (Resident 119). Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Administering Medications, last reviewed on August 7, 2025, revealed that medications must be administered in accordance with the physician's orders and if the dosage is believed to be inappropriate or excessive for a resident or a medication has been identified as having potential adverse consequences for the resident or is suspected of being associated with adverse consequences, the person preparing or administering the medication shall contact the resident's attending physician or the facility's medical director to discuss the concerns. A review of Resident 119's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (brain damage that results from a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate an effective maintenance program of inspection of all bed frames with bed extenders to assure the limiting of entrapment zones and promote resident safety for two residents out of 29 sampled (Resident 1 and Resident 7) and in three resident rooms observed.Findings included: Entrapment is a situation in which a resident's head, neck, chest, or limbs can become trapped between parts of a hospital bed system such as the mattress, bed frame, side rails, or footboard. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) according to Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment issued March 10, 20026 identify seven potential entrapment zones, including the space between the mattress and the footboard of the bed (Zone 6). Zone 7 Between the Head or Foot Board and the End of the Mattress When there is too large of a space between the inside surface of the headboard or footboard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow its own policies and procedures for monitoring nutritional status, obtaining weights, completing reweights, and ensuring timely notification of significant weight changes for six of ten sampled residents (Residents 16, 18, 21, 97, 107, and 119). Findings include: A review of the facility's Nutritional Assessment Policy last reviewed August 7, 2025, indicated that as part of the comprehensive assessment, a nutritional assessment, including nutritional status and risk factors for impaired nutrition, shall be conducted for each resident. The dietitian, in conjunction with the nursing staff and healthcare practitioners, will conduct a nutritional assessment for each resident upon admission and as indicated by change in condition that place the resident at risk for impaired nutrition. The nutritional assessment will be conducted by the interdisciplinary team and identify components…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the availability of a functioning bed for all current licensed and certified resident beds on two of three resident care units, (first floor and second floor).Findings include: The facility is licensed and certified by the State and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for a specific number of resident beds. The facility must provide residents with bedrooms that are appropriately furnished with a bed, mattress, and related equipment in accordance with the facility's license and certification. Licensed capacity, in plain terms, is the maximum number of residents the facility is legally permitted and expected to be accommodated at any given time. Beds must be physically present to demonstrate that the facility is able to provide immediate, safe, and appropriate accommodations for its licensed capacity, and not merely maintain bed space on paper. Observations made during an environmental tour August 14,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to reasonably accommodate residents' need for call bell accommodation for one out of 29 residents sampled (Resident 18).Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled Call Light Policy, last reviewed by the facility on August 7, 2025, revealed that it is the policy to ensure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each resident's bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Further review revealed that each resident will be evaluated for unique needs and preferences to determine any special accommodation that may be needed for the resident to utilize the call system, and any special accommodations will be identified on the resident's person-centered plan of care and provided accordingly, with examples to include touch pads, larger buttons, and bright colors. A review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed that the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to demonstrate that a resident's discharge from the facility was appropriate and necessary, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 112).Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include acute kidney failure (an abrupt decrease in kidney function, resulting in the retention of waste products) and unsteadiness on feet. Review of an entry Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS a federally mandated standardized assessment process completed at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated July 7, 2025, indicated the resident had a BIMS (brief interview mental screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 14 indicating she was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 112's hospital discharge history and physical paperwork from July 7, 2025, revealed the resident had been hospitalized in part due to her inability to care for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the Resident Assessment Instrument, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set Assessments accurately reflected the status of two residents out of 29 sampled. (Residents 21 and 72).Findings include: According to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual (an assessment tool utilized to gather definitive information on a resident's strengths and needs, which must be addressed in an individualized care plan, and the RAI also assists staff to evaluate goal achievement and revise care plans accordingly by enabling the facility to track changes in the resident's status) dated October 2024, Section K0300 Weight Loss the facility is to record loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in the last 6 months. A clinical record review revealed Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 21 was transferred to the hospital on July 17, 2025, and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, resident observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed thoroughly assess and timely implement treatments to an identified skin impairment for one resident out of 29 sampled residents (Resident 16). Findings include: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality, the pressure ulcer best practice bundle incorporates three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers: Comprehensive skin assessment, Standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment and care planning and implementation to address the areas of risk. The American College of Physicians (ACP) is a national organization of internists, who specialize in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of adults. The largest medical-specialty organization and second-largest physician group in the United States) Clinical Practice Guidelines indicate that the treatment of pressure ulcers should involve multiple tactics aimed at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, physician orders, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services and a therapeutic device prescribed to maintain mobility and current level of functioning as ordered by the physician and recommended by rehabilitative therapy staff for one resident (Resident 4) out of five sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility Restorative Nursing Services Policy last updated August 7, 2025, indicated that residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. Residents may be started on a restorative nursing program upon admission, during the course of stay, or when discharged from rehabilitative care. Restorative goals and objectives are individualized and resident-centered and are outlined in the resident's plan of care. The resident or resident representative will be included in determining goals and the plan of care. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of controlled drug shift count records, select facility policy, observations of the medication cart, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to promote accurate documentation of controlled medications for one of three medication carts reviewed (first floor, back cart). Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Controlled Substances last reviewed on August 7, 2025, revealed that nursing staff must count controlled medications at the end of each shift. The policy further stated that the nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty must complete the count together and that both nurses are required to sign the record to verify accuracy. In addition, the policy directed that any discrepancies must be reported to the Director of Nursing Services immediately A review of controlled drug records (also known as narcotics are medications that are regulated by federal law due to their high risk of abuse or misuse) for the first-floor, back medication cart revealed multiple instances in which the required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility policy, review of manufacturer instructions, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement and adhere to procedures to ensure acceptable storage and use-by dates for multi-dose medications on one of three medication carts (first floor, back cart).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications, last reviewed by the facility on August 7, 2025, revealed that the facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals and that all such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. A review of manufacturer instructions for Humalog Kwik Pen, Basaglar Kwik Pen, and Humalog Insulin vials revealed that these medications must be stored in the refrigerator until ready for use. Once removed from refrigeration, the insulin vials and pens may be used for up to 28 days. After 28 days, they are to be discarded. On August 14, 2025, at approximately 9:00 A.M., an observation of the first floor, back medication cart was conducted in the presence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to timely notify the resident's interested representative of a change in condition for one resident out of 20 sampled (Resident 19). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status last reviewed by the facility January 2025, indicated the facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and /or status. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), and hypertension (high blood pressure). The resident's clinical record identified an emergency contact as their designated representative. A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS- standardized assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's infection control tracking log, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain and implement a comprehensive program to monitor and prevent infections in the facility, including protocols and provisions for Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 6 of six residents observed (Residents 70, 66, 52, 12, 83, and 33). Findings include: A review of a memo from The Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Quality, Safety & Oversight Group, Ref: QSO-24-08-NH, CDC, Centers for disease control, dated March 20, 2024 regarding, Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of disease revealed, CMS is issuing new guidance for State Survey Agencies and long term care (LTC) facilities on the use of enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) to align with nationally accepted standards. EBP recommendations now include use of EBP for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices during high-contact resident care activities regardless of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-25 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, it was determined the facility did not have one or more individuals serving as the Infection Preventionist (IP) responsible for the facility's infection prevention plan. Findings included: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regulation §483.80(b)(3) states the facility must designate one or more individuals as the infection preventionist (IP) who are responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. The IP must work at least part-time at the facility, physically work onsite in the facility, cannot be an off-site consultant, or perform the IP work at a separate location. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) on October 22, 2024, at 11:40 AM, revealed the prior IP left the role in the beginning of April 2024, and there was currently no designated IP. Further they stated the facility has hired a new IP but she had not started in the position as of the end of survey October 25, 2024. In an interview on October 24, 2024, at 9:47 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy and employee personnel files and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to fully develop and implement established abuse prohibition procedures for screening five of five employees for employment. (Employee 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) Findings include: According to regulatory requirements under §§483.12(a)(3) and 483.12(b)(1) the facility must have written procedures for screening prospective employees, to include reviewing: the employment history (e.g., dates of employment position or title), particularly where there is a pattern of inconsistency; information from former employers, whether favorable or unfavorable; and/or documentation of status and any disciplinary actions from licensing or registration boards and other registries. A review of the facility's Resident Abuse policy last reviewed by the facility January 24, 2024, revealed no procedures for screening potential employees that included obtaining references from current/previous employers. Review of employee personnel files revealed that Employee 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards during medication administration on one of two resident care units. (First floor). Findings include: An observation on the first floor nursing unit on October 24, 2024, at 8:56 AM, during medication administration revealed there were medications located on overbed table in room [ROOM NUMBER]-1. One clear plastic medication cup with what appeared to be crushed medications in a liquid, a second medication cup with a red colored liquid, and a large plastic cup filled with a pink liquid, on Resident 83's overbed table. During an interview with Resident 83, who resides in room [ROOM NUMBER] on October 24, 2024, at 8:56 AM revealed the resident stated the nurse left the medications on the table. Resident 83 further stated, she will give them to me eventually. A review of Resident 83's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated October 2024, revealed the resident was scheduled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to prevent potential urinary tract infections to the extent possible for one resident with an indwelling urinary catheter out of 20 sampled residents (Residents 83). Findings included: A review of Resident 83's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses, which included retention of urine and required the use of an indwelling catheter for urination. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated October 4, 2024, for Acetic Acid irrigation solution 0.25%, use 1 dose via irrigation every day and evening shift. The physician order failed to identify what was to be flushed or the amount of Acetic Acid to be administered. Observation of Resident 83's room on October 22, 2024, at 10:25 a.m. revealed there were two opened irrigation kits with a piston syringes and two opened undated bottle of Acetic Acid 0.25% behind each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen therapy and failed to maintain oxygen equipment in a functional and sanitary manner for three residents out of 20 sampled (Residents 28, 61, and 52). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Equipment Changing last reviewed by the facility on January 24, 2024, revealed that all respiratory equipment must be changed in order to prevent nosocomial infections (healthcare associated infections). The equipment should be marked with the date that it was changed. All equipment should be changed on a weekly basis as well as prn (as needed) if it becomes soiled or falls on the ground. Review of Resident 28's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe), chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and medication records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement pharmacy procedures for accounting for controlled drugs on one of six medication carts. (First Floor Back) Findings included: A review of the facility's policy entitled Controlled Substances last reviewed by the facility on January 24, 2024, revealed that nursing staff must count controlled medications at the end of each shift. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty must make the count together. They much document and report any discrepancies to the Director of Nursing services. A review of the facility's Change of Shift Controlled Substances Count Sheet revealed that the signature of nurse arriving on duty and nurse departing from duty indicates that controlled drugs on the cart have been counted and that the quantity of each medication counted is in agreement with the quantity stated on the Daily Narcotic Count Sheet and that the controlled substance log was reconciled and found to be accurate.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the attending physician acted upon on the pharmacist's reports of irregularities in the drug regimen of four resident of 20 residents reviewed (Residents 28, 10, 73, and 36). Findings include: A review of Resident 28's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on April 17, 2024, with diagnoses to include Thrombophilia (blood disorder that makes the blood in the veins and arteries more likely to clot), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe), and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen passes from the lungs to the blood, making it difficult to breath). A review of the consultant pharmacist's Consultant Pharmacist Communication to Physician dated August 13, 2024, addressed the physician's order for Lovenox (an anticoagulant- blood thinner used to prevent blood clots). The pharmacist recommended the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from unnecessary psychoactive drugs by failing to ensure the presence of clinical rationale for the continued use of an as needed psychotropic medication for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 44 and 20). Findings include: A review of Resident 44's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Bipolar Disorder (a mental illness that causes extreme mood swings, along with changes in energy, sleep, thinking, and behavior). A review of Resident 44's clinical record revealed a physician's order for lorazepam (used to treat anxiety) give 0.5 mg by mouth every 12 hours as needed for Anxiety with a start date of September 9, 2023, and no end date . A review of the October 2024 Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed that the medication (alprazolam) was administered to the resident four times during the month of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of select facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to acceptable storage and use by dates for multi-dose medication on two of six medication carts observed. Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Administering Medications last reviewed by the facility on January 24, 2024, indicated that insulin pens will be clearly labeled with the resident's name or other identifying information. The expiration/beyond use date on the medication label must be checked prior to administering. When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened shall be recorded on the container. An observation of a first floor medication cart on October 24, 2024, at 9:07 a.m., revealed Employee 9 LPN (license practical nurse) was working medication cart. One Basaglar insulin pen, two Lispro insulin pens, and one Humulin 70/30 insulin pen were opened and available for use. There was no evidence that the insulin pens were dated when opened or with an expiration/beyond use date. Further observations of the first floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, payor source data, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to offer routine annual dental services for one resident with Medicaid as a payor source (Resident 52) and failed to promptly refer a resident with mouth pain and a physician's order for a dental consult with Medicaid as a payor source (Resident 86) out of 20 residents sampled Findings include: Review of Resident 52's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on November 2, 2023, and the resident's current payor source was Medicaid. There was no documented evidence at the time of the survey ending October 25, 2024, the resident had been offered dental services in the past year. Review of resident 86's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on June 14, 2024, and the resident's current payor source was Medicaid. A physician's order dated August 1, 2024, revealed on order for a dental consult for left side mouth pain. At the time of the survey ending October 25, 2024, the facility was unable to provide documented evidence the facility had provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's infection control policies and procedures and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for 6 of 12 months reviewed. (April 2024-September 2024). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Antibiotic Stewardship last reviewed January 2024 indicated antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. The purpose of the antibiotic stewardship program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in the residents. Review of the facility's Infection Control surveillance for September 2023 through September 2024, failed to include documentation to indicate that antibiotic monitoring was completed for 6 months (April 2024 through September 2024). During an interview on October 25, 2024, at 9:45 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program that included a system of surveillance to monitor antibiotic use and laboratory correlation for infections for 6 of 12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide meal service in an environment that maintains each resident's dignity for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 42). Findings include: Review of Resident 42's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia. Observation of the third floor nursing unit on October 22, 2024, at approximately 12:20 p.m. revealed Resident 42 was in the dining room. Resident 42's lunch tray was placed in front of her on the table at approximately 12:22 p.m. Resident 42 required assistance with feeding and was unable to feed herself. Further observation revealed that Resident 42 was not assisted with her lunch meal until approximately 12:47 p.m. approximately 25 minutes after it was placed in front of her. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on October 22, 2024, at approximately 1:45 p.m. confirmed that Resident 42 should have been served…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, the Resident Assessment Instrument, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set Assessments accurately reflected the status of one resident out of 20 sampled (Resident 94). Findings include: A review of the clinical record of Resident 94 revealed a physician's order dated August 2, 2024, for the resident to be discharged to home on August 6, 2024. A review of a nurses note dated August 6, 2024, at 11:53 AM revealed that Resident 94 was discharged home via facility transport. The resident was able to walk independently. Discharge instructions provided to the resident. All discharge paperwork was signed by the resident. Medications, prescriptions, and education provided. All personal belongings brought home. Resident not in any form of distress and in good spirits. A review of Resident 94's Discharge MDS Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated August 6, 2024, Section A 2105, indicated that the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan to meet the needs of three out of 20 residents sampled (Residents 86, 28, and 13) Findings including: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include hypertension (elevated blood pressure), Type 2 diabetes (body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). A review of Resident 86's hospital records sent to the facility on June 13, 2024, revealed the resident underwent a pacemaker placement (device implanted in the body to deliver electrical impulses to the heart to help the heartbeat at a normal rate and rhythm) on June 15, 2022. A review of chest x-ray results dated June 12, 2024, confirmed the placement of the pacemaker device. A physician's order dated August 1, 2024, revealed on order for the resident to see a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised as needed to accurately reflect the resident's current needs and services required by one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 22). Findings include: Review of the clinical record of Resident 22 revealed initial admission to the facility on May 11, 2019, with diagnoses to include congestive heart failure (a serious condition that occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), stroke, and anxiety. A review of Resident 22's Elopement/Wander Risk Evaluation dated May 21, 2024, revealed that the resident was a low wander risk as indicated by a score of 1 (a score of 0-4 indicated low risk for wandering/elopement). Review of Resident 22's current physician orders revealed an order dated September 18, 2024, which permitted the resident to go out on pass by himself via the bus. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - federally mandated assessment of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality to ensure that licensed nurses administered medications as prescribed to one resident of 20 sampled residents (Resident 22) Findings included: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates that the registered nurse was to collect complete ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care team by exercising sound judgement based on preparation, knowledge, skills, understandings and past experiences in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to monitor the nutritional parameters for one resident with an identified significant weight loss out of 20 residents sampled (Resident 60). Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Weight Assessment last reviewed by the facility in January 2024, revealed that any weight change of 5 pounds or more since the last assessment will be retaken for confirmation. If the weight loss is verified nursing will notify the physician and dietician. A review of Resident 60's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on December 16, 2021, with diagnoses to include dementia (the loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). A review of the resident's weights noted the following: July 1, 2024 125.0 lbs August 2, 2024 122.0 lbs September 4, 2024 117.0 lbs September 10, 2024 114.0 lbs indicating a 6.6% weight loss in 30 days. The dietician requested a reweight after the five pound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the ready availability of necessary emergency supplies for a resident receiving hemodialysis for one of 20 residents sampled. (Resident 85) Findings include: According to the National Kidney Foundation patients receiving hemodialysis (a machine filters wastes, salts, and fluid from your blood when your kidneys are no longer healthy enough to do this work adequately) should keep emergency care supplies on hand. A review of Resident 85's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility was on August 11, 2024, with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (a chronic kidney disease that occurs when the kidneys can no longer function properly) and dependence on renal hemodialysis. A review of the resident's current plan of care dated August 15, 2024, and last revised August 27, 2024, revealed that the resident required dialysis with the potential for infection, fluid volume excess/deficit, pain, and trauma related to end stage renal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary behavioral health care in a timely manner to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one of 20 residents sampled (Resident 10). Findings include: A review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition that is marked by a mix of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression, mania and a milder form of mania called hypomania). Further review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed the resident exhibited behaviors, including agitation, restlessness, crying and yelling out. Observations on October 22, 2024, between 8:45 a.m. and 9:30 a.m., revealed Resident 10 to be wheeling in and out of her room appearing restless and agitated. The resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a clean and orderly environment in resident areas on three of three resident units (First, Second, and Third Floor Nursing Units) Findings include: Observations on October 11, 2023, at 9:30 AM on the First Floor Nursing Unit in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed multiple dried brown spots on the walls. A dried brown substance was observed on the outside the door on the door frame. The molding in the room was stained with black marks. There was a hole observed in the wall by the molding and another hole in the wall behind bed 1. In resident room [ROOM NUMBER] the walls were scuffed, cracked, and multiple dried brown spots were observed. Dried brown spots were observed on the molding. The molding around the door was peeling. Dirt, debris, and food particles were observed on the floor. A dried crusty brown substance was observed behind bed 2 and the drywall was damaged. In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-11 · tag F0917 — patternMake sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide clean mattresses, bed frames and functional furniture in resident rooms on three of three nursing units (First, Second, and Third Floor). Findings include: A tour of the facility's First Floor Nursing Unit on October 11, 2023, at 9:30 AM revealed in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] the bed frame of bed#2 was coated with an unknown dried substance and brown spots covering the bed frame. The fall mats next to bed were ripped and torn. A tour of the facility's Second Floor Nursing Unit on October 11, 2023, at 9:45 AM revealed in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] the mattress was cracked and flaking. Dried spots, stains, dirt and debris were observed on the bed frame. The mattress in resident room room [ROOM NUMBER] was dirty and an unknown dried substance and brown spots covering the bed frame. A tour of the facility's Third Floor Nursing Unit on October 11, 2023, at 10:08 AM revealed in the dressers in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select resident incident/accident reports and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide necessary supervision and effective safety measures to prevent repeated falls for a resident identified at high risk for falls and known unsafe behaviors, for one resident out of five sampled (Resident 2). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of diabetes, anxiety, nontraumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage and history of falling. A review of a significant change Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment completed at specific times to identify resident care needs) dated April 28, 2023, revealed that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 10 (BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) is a mandatory tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents upon admission into a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of one resident out of five sampled (Residents 2). Findings include: According to the RAI User's Manual, Section J1700, Fall history on admission/entry/reentry Assessment (OBRA or Scheduled PPS), the facility is to record a fall in the past month prior to admission /entry or reentry. A review of Resident 2's significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident did not have have a fall in the last month prior to admission/entry or reentry. However, a review of the resident's clinical record documentation indicated that the resident had a fall on March 27, 2023. According to the RAI User's Manual, Section J1700 , Fall history on admission/entry/reentry Assessment (OBRA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide individualized care instructions for the resident's plans for care after discharge for one of two discharged residents reviewed (Resident 1) Findings include: A review of the closed clinical record revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including colon cancer, sacral ulcer and muscle weakness. Resident 1 was discharged home on August 22, 2023. A review of Resident 1's clinical record, conducted during the survey ending September 7, 2023, revealed a Discharge Record form dated August 18, 2023, which included the resident's admitting diagnosis as pressure ulcer, sacral region, stage 4. A Discharge Summary form dated August 18, 2023, noted the reason for the resident's discharge as completed therapy and skilled care. In the section Social Services, question 8. indicated to List any follow up appointments scheduled, include name and speciality. The resident's attending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary antibiotic drugs for one out of five residents sampled (Resident 1). Findings included: A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed a physician order dated August 15, 2023, to obtain a urinalysis and culture and sensitivity to rule out urinary tract infection. A review of a laboratory report for a urinalysis dated August 16, 2023, revealed the results as abnormal with blood, protein and bacteria in the sample. A physician's order dated August 16, 2023, was noted for Cephalexin 500 mg (an antibiotic medication) by mouth every 12 hours for 7 days for urinary tract infection. There was no physician/prescribed documentation of the clinical necessity of initiating antibiotic therapy prior to the results of the culture and sensitivity. A review of the resident's medication administration record for the month of August 2023, revealed that the resident received 13 doses of Cephalexin medication prior to her discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records and the facility's infection prevention and control program and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an antibiotic stewardship program that includes a system to effectively monitor antibiotic usage as evidenced by one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the facility policy for Antibiotic Stewardship, dated as reviewed July 2023, revealed that to reduce a resident's risk of adverse drug reactions and preserve drug efficacy in the face of rising multi-drug resistant pathogens, the facility: -Ensures staff expertise to develop and manage the antibiotic stewardship program, improve antibiotic use and the frequency with which they are used, with a commitment to quality improvement. -Educate staff on the importance of appropriate antibiotic use, and implementing strategies to optimize the use of antibiotics. -monitors antibiotic prescribing-Antibiotic stewardship measurement is critical to identify opportunities for improvement and assess the impact of improvement efforts. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRANKEL, YOSEF | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 50% | since 12/01/2024 |
| EICHENBLATT, YISROEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| KURLAND, BENJAMIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| ODEYEMI, OLUTUNDE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| GPH EAST STROUDSBURG LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395288. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.