Elizabethtown Nursing And Rehabilitation
141 Heisey Avenue, Elizabethtown, PA 17022 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 45 certified beds · (717) 367-1831 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.3% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.7% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 28.5% | 10.8% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.6% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.9% | 20.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.2% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.5% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.2% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 57.5% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.5% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.3% | 9.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.75 | 1.62 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.26 | 1.18 | 1.80 | worse |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 163 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.9%CMS range 50.5–65.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.0%CMS range 10.0–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.9%CMS range 3.5–10.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 41.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-18 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative of the resident transfer, in writing, to include the following: the reason for the transfer or discharge, date of transfers, location of transfer, statement of the resident's appeal rights, and name, address (mailing and email) and telephone number of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman; and failed to provide the resident/resident representative written notice of the bed hold policy at time of transfer for four of four residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents 10, 23, 32, and 43). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Transfer or Discharge Documentation, revised December 2016, read, in part, an appropriate transfer notice will be provided to the resident and/or legal representative. Review of facility policy Bed-Hold and Return to Facility Policy and Procedure, initiated 2015, read, in part, before the resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to review and revise the resident plan of care for five of 13 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 19, 26, 27, and 30). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, revised December 2016, read, in part, the care plan will include services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, and incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems. Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about residents and the resident's condition changes. The interdisciplinary team must review and update the care plan. Review of Resident 2's clinical record diagnoses that included depression (feelings of severe despondency and dejection), anxiety disorder (a feeling of worry nervousness or unease), intellectual disabilities (a condition characterized by significant limitations in both intellectual function and adaptive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee handbook review, review of select facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed at least once every 12 months for five of five nurse aides reviewed (Employees 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). Findings include: Based on facility document, titled Employee Handbook effective June 6, 2023, read, in part, All employees will be subject to a written annual rating and evaluation by the department supervisor based on his/her anniversary date. This evaluation will be reviewed with the employee by the supervisor at the time of presentation for the employee's signature. Review of select facility documentation revealed a list of nurse aide's that had worked at the facility for greater than a year, which included: Employee 1 had a hire date of December 26, 2023; Employee 2 had a hire date of April 1, 2020; Employee 3 had a hire date of May 21, 2018; Employee 4 had a hire date of May 6, 2024; and Employee 5 had a hire date of April 15, 2002. Interview with the Director of Nursing on June…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI - a standardized approach for applying a problem identification process in nursing homes, adopted to examine nursing home quality and to improve nursing home regulation), clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for three of 13 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 26, and 27). Findings included: Review of RAI Version 3.0 dated October 2024, pages N1 - 11, read, in part, N0415 high risk drug classes: is taking - check if the resident is taking any medication by pharmacological classification during the last 7 days or since admission. Indication noted 1 is checked if there is an indication noted for all medications in the drug class. Review of Resident 2's clinical record diagnoses that included depression (feelings of severe despondency and dejection), anxiety (a feeling of worry nervousness or unease), intellectual disabilities (a condition characterized by significant limitations in both intellectual function and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline plan of care for one of two residents reviewed for new admission (Resident 95). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plans - Baseline, last reviewed January 15, 2025, revealed it stated, A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission The interdisciplinary team will review the healthcare practitioner's orders (e.g., dietary needs, medications, routine treatments, etc.) and implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate care needs . Review of Resident 95's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included history of venous thrombosis (blood clot formation) and embolism (blood clot that travels through the circulatory system and blocks blood flow through a vessel) and hypertension (elevated/high blood pressure). Review of Resident 95's clinical record revealed that Resident 95 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, review of select facility fall reports, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents and failed to conduct thorough fall investigations for one of two residents reviewed for falls (Resident 10). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing last reviewed on January 25, 2025, read, in part, Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try and prevent the resident from falling and try to minimize complications from falling. Resident conditions that may contribute to the risk of falls include lower extremity weakness. Review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included wedge compression fracture (a type of compression fracture that occurs when vertebrae collapses and creates a wedge shape) unspecified fall and unsteadiness on feet. Review of facility fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a physician ordered nutritional supplement, per physician's order, for two of four residents reviewed for nutritional status (Residents 2 and 26), and failed to notify the physician of significant weight changes for two of four residents reviewed for nutritional status (Residents 10, and 26). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Weight Policy last reviewed January 25, 2025, read, in part, The Registered Dietitian will review the medical record of residents with significant weight changes. Dietary interventions will be recommended as needed. All significant weight changes will be reported to the physician. Review of facility policy, titled Medication Administration last reviewed January 25, 2025, read, in part, Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders. If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall initial and circle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a timely assessment for trauma, and then develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to render trauma-informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for one of one resident reviewed with PTSD (Resident 2). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Trauma Informed Care, revised March 2019, read, in part, nursing staff are trained on screening tools, trauma assessment, and how to identify triggers associated with re-traumatization. Implement universal screening of residents for trauma. Review of Resident 2's clinical record diagnoses that included depression (feelings of severe despondency and dejection), anxiety (a feeling of worry nervousness or unease), intellectual disabilities (a condition characterized by significant limitations in both intellectual function and adaptive behavior), PTSD (a mental disorder that develops from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure opened vials were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for one of one medication rooms reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Labeling and Storage, last reviewed January 15, 2025, revealed subsection five of Medication Labeling, stated, Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g., needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. During observation of the facility medication storage room on June 17, 2025, revealed two of two vials of tuberculosis purified protein derivative solution (PPD - used to determine resident or staff exposure or infection with tuberculosis) were opened with no opened date written on the vial or the box that contained the vial. During a staff interview directly after the observation, Employee 9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed that the two vials appeared accessed and that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of 13 residents (Resident 8). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Attending Physician Responsibilities; with a last review date of January 15, 2025, revealed, in part, Each attending physician will be responsible for providing appropriate, timely, and pertinent documentation; At each visit, the attending physician will provide a progress note (written, typed, or electronic) in a timely manner for placement in the medical record. The note should either be written or entered at the time of the visit or, if dictated or otherwise prepared after the visit, should be returned to the facility for placement on the chart within a week. Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and fractures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the transmission of diseases and infections for two of two resident rooms observed (Residents 1 and 2). Findings Include: An entrance interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on March 4, 2025, at approximately 8:50 AM, revealed the facility has several residents who tested positive for COVID-19, and the facility is following its COVID-19 infection policy and procedures. Visitors are encouraged to wear surgical masks and screen for signs and symptoms of infection while in the building, and staff providing direct care to those infected residents to wear the required personal protective equipment (PPE). A review of the facility's policy, titled Covid-19 Infection Control Protocols to Minimize Expose, updated February 2024, revealed residents/resident rooms with Covid-19 exposure and positive tests will require staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a data collection system of surveillance for 10 of 12 months reviewed (October 2023, November 2023, December 2023, January 2024, February 2024, March 2024, April 2024, May 2024, June 2024, and July 2024). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Infection Control, last reviewed June 2024, revealed the facility will maintain a monthly line list of residents with infections for trending and outbreak potential, follow-up review of lab data is compared, and a monthly review is completed to identify trends to facilitate infection control surveillance. The purpose of the surveillance of infections is to identify both individual cases and trends of epidemiologically significant organisms and health-care associated infections, to guide appropriate interventions and required reporting, and to prevent future infections. The facility's monthly infection control logs for October 2023 through July 2024 were unable to be provided by the facility. The infection control log book had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-18 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and state regulations, it was determined that the facility failed to have an Infection Preventionist (IP) that completed an approved program for specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regulation §483.80(b)(4) stated, The facility must designate one or more individual(s) as the Infection Preventionist(s) (IP(s) who are responsible for the facility's IPCP (Infection Prevention Control Program) that have completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on July 15, 2024, at 10:00 AM, Employee 4's (Registered Nurse) IP credentials were requested. The DON confirmed Employee 4 is currently doing the modules that are required to obtain certification for the IP position. The DON also informed the surveyor that no Infection Control data has been tracked since September 2023. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(2) Management
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer the option to formulate an advance directive, as evidenced by utilization of only the POLST (Pennsylvania Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) and no documentation of the resident's choices pertaining to advanced directives or documenting how the resident was informed of his or her right to develop a living will or advance directive for four of 35 records reviewed (Residents 1, 20, 33, and 45). Findings include: The facility's admission packet referring to the advance directive section stated, . if the resident has a health care directive, he or she must provide a valid executed original advance directive to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). There is no indication that residents are offered the opportunity to formulate an advance directive. A review of Resident 1's clinical record failed to include a discussion regarding the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive. There was no Advance Directive/Living Will present in the clinical record. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, document review, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve resident grievances for two of 10 grievances reviewed, and failed to post in prominent locations the contact information of the identified Grievance Official, including the name, business address (mailing and email), and business phone number in one facility area observed (facility bulletin board). Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, titled Resident and Family Concerns and Grievances Policy and Procedure, dated 2022, defines its purpose as To provide for the prompt resolution of medical and non-medical grievances while maintaining confidentiality, in accordance with applicable federal and state statutes and regulations. The policy continued, The Facility will provide the resident with a written Grievance Decision, which shall include: a. the date the grievance was received; b. a summary statement of the resident's grievance; c. the steps taken to investigate the grievance; d. a summary of the pertinent findings or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food/beverages in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the kitchen and in one of one nourishment pantries observed and for one of one meal observed. Findings include: Review of facility policy, Outside Food, revised July 2023, read, in part, food brought in from outside sources will be labeled with content and date and discarded after 5 days. Review of facility policy, Food Storage, revised June 6, 2024, read, in part, open items should be labeled with content and open date. Observation in the kitchen on July 15, 2024, at 9:31 AM, revealed one plastic container with bulk thickener wasn't marked with a label or date. During an interview with Employee 1 (Director of Dinning), revealed the container should be labeled with contents and date. Observation at the three-compartment sink on July 15, 2024, at 9:32 AM, the pH test strips were not available. During an interview with Employee 1, it was revealed that the pH test strips are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, the facility's infection prevention and control policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an antibiotic stewardship program that includes a system to effectively monitor antibiotic usage as evidenced by two of three residents reviewed (Residents 6 and 23). Findings include: A review of the facility policy, titled Antibiotic Stewardship-Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcomes, last reviewed June 2024, stated, antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using a facility-approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of resident antibiotic prescribing practices and facility-wide antibiotic stewardship. The IP (infection preventionist), or designee will review antibiotic utilization as part of the antibiotic stewardship program and identify specific situations that are not consistent with the appropriate use of antibiotics. a. Therapy may require further review and possible changes if: (1) The organism is not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were offered influenza and pneumococcal as required for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 33 and 41). Findings include: Review of facility policy for influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID 19, last reviewed June 2024, indicated that before any of the vaccine is received, the resident or their legal representative shall receive information regarding risks and benefits of the vaccine. The policy also revealed that consents and refusals would be documented in the resident's clinical record. A review of Resident 33's clinical record on July 18, 2024, confirmed that Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The clinical record revealed Resident 33 refused the influenza in 2022 and 2023. There was no record of pneumococcal vaccine for Resident 33. Further review of the clinical record revealed no education on risks and benefits, and no consent or refusal documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were offered any current COVID-19 vaccinations as required for four of five residents reviewed (Residents 1, 12, 33, and 41). Findings include: Review of facility policy for COVID 19, last reviewed June 2024, indicated that before any of the vaccine is received, the resident or their legal representative shall receive information regarding risks and benefits of the vaccine. The policy also revealed that consents and refusals would be documented in the resident's clinical record. The physician will assess the resident for any contraindications to receiving the vaccine. A review of Resident 1's clinical record on July 18, 2024, confirmed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the clinical record revealed no historical (past) COVID-19 vaccine or any documentation to confirm that the COVID-19 vaccine was offered by the facility since admission. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0575 — isolatedPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post, in a form and manner accessible and understandable to residents, a list of names, addresses (mailing and email), and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies, advocacy groups, and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning suspected violations of state or federal nursing facility regulations for one area observed (facility bulletin board). Findings Include: An observation of the facility's bulletin board, containing information for resident review, on July 15, 2024, at 11:04 AM, revealed no information listing resident advocacy groups, the State agency information, including mailing and email addresses, telephone numbers, and statements regarding the resident's right to file complaints with State and Federal agencies. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, on July 17, 2024, at 1:40 PM, revealed the required information is now posted and accessible for resident review. 28 Pa. Code 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure its residents the right to examine the results of the most recent survey and that those results are posted in a place readily accessible to its residents for one area observed (facility lobby). Findings Include: An observation in the facility's lobby, on July 15, 2024, at 10:32 AM, revealed the facility's survey results book in an area accessible only by using a code to gain entrance and exit. Observations in resident areas, beyond the locked lobby area, revealed no survey books for resident review in the dining area, the resident common area, the nurses' station, or the designated activities area. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, on July 17, 2024, at 1:38 PM, revealed the facility's survey results book is now accessible in resident areas and confirmed the book should not only be present in the facility's locked area. 28 Pa. Code 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident is periodically informed of any charges for services not covered under Medicare for two of three residents reviewed at the end of a Medicare stay (Residents 1 and 148). Findings Include: A review of Resident 1's Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Notification Review form revealed the last covered day of Medicare A coverage on April 30, 2024. A review of the facility-provided Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage form (SNF-ABN), revealed Resident 1 would no longer receive Medicare covered therapy services after April 30, 2024, and the estimated cost of those non-covered services was not provided to Resident 1 or her responsible party. A review of Resident 148's Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Notification Review form revealed a last covered day of Medicare A coverage on February 17, 2024. A review of the facility-provided SNF-ABN form revealed Resident 148 would no longer receive Medicare covered therapy services after February 17,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative and the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of resident transfers in writing to include to include the following: the reason for the transfer or discharge, date of transfer, location of transfer, statement of the resident's appeal rights, and name, address (mailing and email) and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, for two of three resident records reviewed for hospital transfers (Residents 19 and 46 ). Findings include: Review of Resident 19's clinical record documented diagnoses that included depression (feelings of severe despondency and dejection), diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine), hemiparesis left non-dominant side (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and resident representative received written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of transfer for one of three resident records reviewed for hospital transfers (Resident 19). Findings Include: Review of Resident 19's clinical record documented diagnoses that included depression (feelings of severe despondency and dejection), diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine), hemiparesis left non-dominant side (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs and facial muscles), stroke (damage to the brain from interruption of blood supply), and epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disrupted, causing seizures). During an interview with Resident 19 on July 15, 2024, 10:39 AM, it was revealed she was transferred to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of three residents receiving oxygen therapy reviewed (Resident 40). Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, titled Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team, revised September 2013, read, in part, Our facility's care planning/interdisciplinary team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident. A review of Resident 40's physician orders revealed diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - A group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and muscle weakness. An observation of Resident 40, on July 15, 2024, at approximately 11:00 AM, revealed the use of an oxygen concentrator while in bed in her room. A review of Resident 40's interdisciplinary plan of care revealed none developed to address the use of oxygen, goals, and interventions. An interview with the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards regarding medication and treatment administration for two of 23 residents reviewed (Residents 24 and 40). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, Administering Medication, revised April 2019, read, in part, medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. Staffing schedules are arranged to ensure that medications are administered without unnecessary interruptions. If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall initial and circle the Medication Administration Record (MAR- recording of physician orders being administered or completed) space provided for that drug and dose. The individual administering the medication initial the resident's MAR on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next one. Review of Resident 24's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of three residents receiving oxygen therapy reviewed (Resident 40). Findings Include: A review of Resident 40's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - A group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and muscle weakness. An observation of Resident 40, on July 15, 2024, at approximately 11:00 AM, revealed the use of an oxygen concentrator while in bed in her room. A review of Resident 40's physician orders revealed none documenting the Resident's need and use of oxygen. An interview with the Director of Nursing on July 18, 2024, at 9:28 AM, revealed that the facility could not locate an order from the physician for Resident 40's use of oxygen. 28 Pa. Code 211.5 (f) Medical records 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d) 5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the licensed pharmacist's report of a medication irregularity was reviewed and acted upon for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 24). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Medication Therapy, revised April 2007, read, in part, the consultant pharmacist shall review each resident's medication regimen monthly, as requested by the staff or practitioner, or when a clinically significant adverse consequence is confirmed or suspected. Review of Resident 24's clinical record documented diagnoses that included depression (feelings of severe despondency and dejection), diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine), and schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition including schizophrenia and mood disorder symptoms such as depression. Symptoms may include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adherence to appropriate labeling of medication for one of two medication carts (front hall cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Administering Medications, last reviewed June 2024, revealed that the expiration/beyond use date on the medication label is checked prior to administering. When opening the multi-dose medication, the date opened is recorded on the medication container. The policy also stated, Insulin pens are clearly labeled with the resident's name, or other identifying information prior to use. Observation during the front hall medication cart review on July 16, 2024, at 1:35 PM, revealed one Novolog insulin pen (aka insulin aspart-a fast acting insulin) in Resident 1's medication compartment opened, without a resident identifier, or the date it was removed from the refrigerator. This insulin is to remain in the refrigerator until opened for use, and then expires in 28 days after opening. During an interview with Employee 10 (Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on state regulations, review of facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director and Infection Preventionist (IP) was in attendance at least quarterly at the Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) Committee meetings, and failed to provide sign-in records for QAPI Committee meetings for one of four quarters (first quarter). Findings include: Review of the CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) revealed: §483.75(g) Quality assessment and assurance. §483.75(g) Quality assessment and assurance. §483.75(g)(1) A facility must maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting at a minimum of: The director of nursing services, The Medical Director or his/her designee, At least three other members of the facility's staff, at least one of who must be the administrator, owner, a board member, or other individual in a leadership role, The Infection Preventionist, and Meet at least quarterly and as needed to coordinate and evaluate activities under the QAPI program, such as identifying issues with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation, and the transition to post-discharge care for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings Include: Review of the facility's Social Services/Social Worker job description, described the essential duties and responsiblities as, Works with the resident, family and other members of the health care team to formulate a discharge plan that provides the resident services in the appropriate post-acute setting. Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebral cysts (fluid filled sacs in the brain) and Diabetes Mellitus Type II (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high). Review of Resident 2's order summary sheet revealed the need for the use of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC-a type of long catheter that is inserted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of employee files, review of facility policies and procedures, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse by failing to conduct license verification for new employees for three of four employees (Employees 2, 3, and 6) Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Residents Right to Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy and Procedure, dated 2022, revealed, The Facility will not employ or otherwise engage individuals who: Have disciplinary action in effect against his or her professional license by a state licensure body as a result of a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of resident property. Review of Employee file for Employee 2 revealed a date of hire of June 28, 2023. Further review of the employee file failed to reveal any license verification or check with the state licensing board for disciplinary action against Employee 2's license. Review of Employee file for Employee 3 revealed a date of hire of July 20, 2023. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed for four of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 29, 32, 145, and 146). Findings include: Review of Resident 29's clinical record documented diagnoses that included bladder cancer, protein calorie malnutrition, and diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine). Clinical record review for Resident 29 documented her physician ordered hospice care on March 10, 2023. Review of Resident 29's care plan documented a focus area for Hospice services as of March 10, 2023, with an initiated date of July 14, 2023. During an interview with the Assistant Nursing Home Administrator and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on August 16, 2023, at 2:23 PM, it was revealed that the hospice care plan for Resident 29 should've been initiated upon admission to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient staff to assure residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for eight of 16 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 4, 7, 17, 19, 23, 26, and 30). Findings Include: During the initial pool process on August 14, 2023, Residents 3, 7, and 17 expressed concern to the survey team about call bell response time and/or staffing. Review of resident council meeting minutes and interviews with Residents 4, 19, 23, 26, and 30 during the group meeting, revealed concerns with call bell response times and insufficient staff. Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses including hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and anxiety disorder (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease). Review of Resident 3's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - assessment tool utilized to identify a resident's physical, emotional, and psychosocial needs), dated August 2, 2023, revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on document review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months for five of five nurse aide performance evaluations reviewed (Employees 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11). Findings Include: Review of annual performance reviews for the following Nursing Assistant Employees 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 revealed no annual performance reviews were completed. During an interview with Assistant Nursing Home Administrator on August 17, 2023, at 8:50 AM, it was revealed that the facility doesn't have proof that performance reviews were completed for the aforementioned employees. 28 Pa. Code 201.19 Personnel policies and procedures
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility temperature logs and records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness (Walk-in Refrigerator). Findings include: On August 14, 2023, at approximately 9:46 AM, during initial tour of the walk-in refrigerator with the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the thermometer on the outside of the walk-in refrigerator to read 41 degrees. The thermometer on the inside of the walk-in refrigerator read 46 degrees. Interview with FSD on August 14, 2023, at approximately 9:49 AM, revealed that they have a quote submitted to get the walk-in refrigerator fixed and reached out to the maintenance director when they first became aware of the issue, which was on July 31, 2023. Review of the walk-in refrigerator temperature log for August 2023, revealed that on August 1 through August…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based staff interview, select policy review, and documents reviewed for implementation of a water management program, it was determined the facility failed to implement their water management program for the prevention, detection, and control of water-borne contaminants, such as Legionella (a bacteria that may cause Legionnaires' Disease [a serious type of pneumonia]). Findings include: Review of facility provided policy, titled Legionella Water Management Program, revised July 2017, revealed, The water management program includes the following elements: f. The control limits or parameters that are acceptable and that are monitored, h. A system to monitor and control limits and effectiveness of control measures, i. A plan for when control limits are not met and/or control measures are not effective. Review of Facility provided documents on August 17, 2023, failed to reveal any water testing for Legionella or other water-borne pathogens. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on August 17, 2023, at 11:45 AM, revealed that the facility has not completed any water testing, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage appropriately, in advance of changes for Medicare covered services, to one of three residents reviewed whose Medicare coverage was discontinued (Resident 36). Findings include: Review of Resident 36's clinical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], payor source was Medicare A. Skilled services ended on July 15, 2023, Resident 36's payor source changed to private pay at that time, and Resident 36 remained in the facility. Resident 36 was issued a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC- indicates when you coverage for care is set to end) on July 11, 2023. The Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN, a form provides information that as of a specific date Medicare coverage ends and the specific amount of financial liability passed onto the resident) was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental or psychosocial needs) assessment was completed timely after election of hospice care for two of 16 residents reviewed (Residents 29 and 32). Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's manual (RAI - a standardized process is the basis for the accurate assessment of each nursing home resident) dated October 2021, revealed that the facility must complete a significant change MDS no later than 14 days after the effective date of the election of hospice service. Review of Resident 29's clinical record documented diagnoses that included bladder cancer, protein calorie malnutrition, and diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine). Clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services necessary for care-dependent residents for two out of 16 residents reviewed (Residents 3 and 19). Findings Include: Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and anxiety disorder (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease). Review of Resident 3's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - assessment tool utilized to identify a resident's physical, emotional, and psychosocial needs), dated August 2, 2023, revealed that under section C, Cognitive Patterns, more specifically subsection C0500. BIMS Summary Score, Resident 3 is coded to have a BIMS of 14 out of 15. Review of Resident 3's comprehensive care plan on August 15, 2023, under the Focus section for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care, created on April 19, 2019, and initiated on March 4, 2020, revealed that Resident 3 requires one staff member to move between surfaces. Observation on August 15, 2023, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent infection of a pressure ulcer for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 21). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Wound Care with a revised date of October 2010, under the Documentation section revealed, The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. The type of wound care given. 2. The date and time the wound care was given. Review of Resident 21's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a group of disorders that affect a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture) and hypertension ( high blood pressure). Further review of Resident 21's clinical record revealed that Resident 21 has a stage 3 pressure ulcer on the sacral region. Review of Resident 21's current physician orders revealed the following treatment for the sacrum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 7). Findings include: Review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus Type II (a long-term metabolic disorder that is characterized by high blood sugar, insulin resistance, and relative lack of insulin) and End Stage Renal Disease (occurs when the kidneys are no longer able to work at a level needed for day-to-day life). An interview with Resident 7 on August 14, 2023, at 12:00 PM, revealed that the Resident attends dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday from 10:00 AM to 3:30 PM. Review of Resident 7's current physician orders on August 14, 2023, revealed that Resident 7 is ordered to have dialysis every Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on August 16,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (two errors in 28 observations, 7.14%). Findings include: Review of facility provided policy, titled Administering Medications, revised April 2019, revealed, Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders. Review of Resident 195's current physician's orders on August 16, 2023, at 8:45 AM, revealed a current physician's order for Aspirin 81 mg oral tablet chewable to be administered daily. Further review failed to reveal any physician's order for enteric coated Aspirin. Further review of Resident 195's current physician orders revealed a current order for Budesonide/Formoterol 80/4.5 inhaler, two inhalations orally two times a day, rinse mouth after use. During observation of medication administration on August 16, 2023, at 8:30 AM, Employee 6 was observed preparing a medication for Resident 195. At that time, Employee 6 prepared one 81 mg tablet of enteric coated aspirin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of nurse aide in-service records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Nursing Assistants received a minimum of 12 hours of in-service education training each year that include the following topics: infection control, dementia, communication, and behavioral health, for five of five nurse aide performance evaluations reviewed (Employees 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11). Findings include: Review of the facility's yearly mandatory in-service training failed to reveal documented evidence that Employees 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 met the yearly regulatory minimum training requirements (12 hours within one year). Further review of in-service training revealed that Employees 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 failed to complete training regarding behavioral health and communication. Furthermore, Employees 9 and 10 failed to complete training regarding infection control, and Employee 11 failed to complete dementia training. During an interview with Assistant Nursing Home Administrator on August 17, 2023, at 8:50 AM, it was revealed that competencies are completed as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PA 3 OPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 05/15/2023 |
| PA 3 HOLDCO | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2013 |
| BORNSTEIN, SHLOMO | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| ELKOUBY, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| FERZIGER, BENZION | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| FISHBANE, BENZION | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| MENDIOWITZ, CHAIM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| SENDEROVITS, ELIEZER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| STEINBERG, EPHRAIM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| TRESS, SHMUEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2023 |
| ET 141 PROPERTY LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2023 |
| DANKENBRING, BROOKE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| GINDER, JOHN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/23/2023 |
| KIRKHAM, CATHERINE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $179K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395844. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.