Emerald Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 133 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 49.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 73 beds and averages 66.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documentation, clinical record reviews, and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to one of twelve residents reviewed (Resident R1) who was inaccurately assessed as a low risk for elopement. This failure resulted in Resident R1 exiting nursing unit via the elevator and walking out the front entrance doors. The facility was not aware Resident R1 was missing until the resident's daughter called and informed the facility Resident R1 had walked to her house crossing multiple busy streets. This failure placed the resident at high risk for injury and was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy of past non-compliance. (Resident R1)Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled, wandering and elopements, revealed the facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · H2026-05-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and procedure, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate urinary catheter care for four of six residents reviewed (Residents 6, 8, 28, and 47) resulting in actual harm for three of six residents who contracted urinary tract infections requiring subsequent hospitalizations (Resident 6, 28 and 47).Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Catheter Care, Urinary (revised September 2014), revealed documentation of catheter care should be documented in the resident's medical record. This documentation should include the date and time catheter care was given, the name of the staff providing the catheter care, and all assessment data obtained during catheter care. Review of Resident 6's Physician Orders revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a suprapubic catheter (tube inserted through a small abdominal incision directly into the bladder to drain urine when the urethra is blocked or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for one three of five residents reviewed resulting in actual harm to one, resident Resdient1. (Resident 1, 2, and 3).Findings include: Review of Resident 1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated November 27, 2025, revealed the resident was cognitively intact; dependent on staff for daily care needs, and had a diagnosis of Chronic diastolic (congestive) Heart Failure (CHF-progressive condition where the heart cannot pump blood effectively, causing blood to back up and fluid to accumulate in the lungs and body). Review of Resident 1's physician's orders revealed an order dated November 22, 2025, for Torsemide (medication used to treat high blood pressure and fluid retention caused by congestive heart failure) 120 mg (milligrams) by mouth twice a day for CHF (congestive heart failure). Further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record and facility documentation, observations, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of two residents reviewed was provided with adequate supervision to prevent accidents which resulted in actual harm to Resident 1 sustaining a fall, requiring transfer to the hospital via emergency medical services and the diagnosis of a fracture involving the neck of the right humerus (long bone of the upper arm). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Safety and Supervision of Residents, revised July 2017, revealed the care team shall target interventions to reduce individual risks related to hazards in the environment, including adequate supervision and assistive devices. Review of Resident 1's clinical record included diagnoses of, but not limited to, Malignant Neoplasm (cancer) of the kidney and Muscle Weakness. Review of Resident 1's current care plan revised April 28, 2023, identified the resident was at moderate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based upon observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate sanitization monitoring and documentation was completed for daily dishwasher sanitization for one of one dishwasher observed.Findings include:Observation of the facility dishwashing machine located in the kitchen on April 20, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. revealed the dishwashing machine to be running.Interview with Employee E6 on April 20, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. revealed the dishwasher water temperature to be 125 degrees.Review of the dishwasher log on April 20, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. revealed the log to be completed.Observation during a second visit to the kitchen on April 22, 2026, at 10:15 a.m. revealed the dishwasher to be running.Interview with Employee E6 on April 22, 2026, at 10:15 a.m. revealed that no test strips were immediately available to test the sanitization of the water coming out of the dishwasher.Upon locating test strips, the water was tested and revealed to be greater than 100 PPM (parts per million).Review of the dishwasher sanitization log on April 22, 2026, at 10:15 a.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the office of the state long term care ombudsman of emergency transfers for four of eight residents reviewed (Residents 2, 5, 8, and 9). Findings include: Review of Resident 2's progress note of January 7, 2026, revealed that the resident was seen by the wound nurse practitioner (NP) and was noted to have a painful, red lump to the incision line. NP recommended to reach out to wound center and or surgeon. An additional note on January 7, 2026, revealed that a representative from the surgical group suggested that the resident be sent to the emergency department. Resident was admitted for left above the knee amputation cellulitis (bacterial infection of the deep skin layers). Review of facility documentation failed to reveal evidence that the State Ombudsman's office was notified of Resident 2's transfer and admission to the hospital. Review of Resident 5's progress note of January 9, 2026, revealed that 911 was activated to take Resident 5 to the hospital for treatment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings include:Review of Resident 2's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - periodic assessment of resident needs) of March 22, 2026, section N0350 - Insulin, indicated that the resident was receiving insulin on one day in the last seven days Further review of the physician's orders and Medication Administration Record revealed no evidence that the resident received insulin during the assessment lookback period.Interview with licensed staff, E4, on April 23, 2026, at 1:35 p.m. confirmed that the assessment was coded inaccurately.28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain accurate weights and verify weights to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 31).Findings include:Review of facility policy, Weight Assessment and Intervention revised September 2008, revealed that any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken the next day for confirmation. Review of Resident 31's weights revealed a weight of 131.0 pounds on December 2, 2025, and 111.0 pounds on January 8, 2026 indicating a loss of 20 pounds or 15.3%. Further review of the clinical record revealed that no reweight was obtained. Resident 31's weight was recorded as 113.0 pounds on January 15, 2026, and 125.0 pounds on January 20, 2026, indicating a gain of 14 pounds or 12.6% with no reweight obtained. Next weight of 116.0 pounds was obtained on February 3, 2026, indicating a loss of 9 pounds or 7.2% with no reweight obtained. Interview with Employee E4 on April 23,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based upon review of facility policy and procedure and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were administered following facility infection prevention protocol for one of two residents observed (Resident 1).Findings include:Review of facility policy and procedure titled Administering Medications revealed Staff follows established facility infection control procedures (e.g. handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation preventions, etc.) for the administration of medications, as applicable.Observation of medication administration on April 22, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. revealed Licensed Employee E3 cut open medication pill packets and spill the medications onto the top of the medication cart. Licensed Employee E3 picked up the medications off of the top of the medication cart and placed them in a medication cup and administered them to Resident 1.The above information was conveyed to Licensed Employee E4 and the Nursing Home Administrator on April 23, 2026, at 1:00 p.m. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1)(5) Nursing ServicesPreviously cited 5/22/2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a clean and homelike environment for one of three bathrooms observed (Resident 2's bathroom). Findings: An observation was conducted in Resident 2's bathroom on March 27, 2026, at 12:10 p.m., in the presence of licensed nurse Employee E3. The observations revealed the following: dried brown substances in front of the toilet bowl; brown substances in the toilet bowl; two used towels in the sink; one used drawsheet, a used gown, and a wet washcloth with brown stains on the bathroom floor; and a garbage can overflowed with used incontinent briefs. An interview with Employee E3 was conducted on March 27, 2026, at 12:15 p.m. Employee E3 confirmed that the resident's bathroom smelled of urine. The above findings were conveyed to the Nursing Home Administrator on March 27, 2026, at 3:00 p.m. The facility failed to ensure Resident 2's bathroom was maintained clean. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(1) Management

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide PPE and signage for residents who require enhanced barrier precautions for one of six residents reviewed. (Resident 1)Findings Include:Review of facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, effective March 2024, revealed EPB (enhanced barrier precautions) are indicated (when contact precautions do not otherwise apply) for residents with wounds and/or indwelling medical devices regardless of MDRO (multi-drug resistant organism) colonization .Signs are posted in the door or wall outside the resident room indicating the type of precautions and PPE (personal protective equipment) required .PPE is available outside of the resident rooms.Observation of Resident 1 on February 4, 2026 at approximately 12:05PM revealed the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to continuously drain urine into an external bag). Further observations revealed there was no PPE in the room and there was no sign for EBP.Two Licensed Practical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the review of clinical records, job descriptions, review of facility policy, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) did not effectively manage the facility to ensure the safety of one of twelve residents reviewed (Resident R1) with a diagnosis of Dementia who eloped from the facility. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident R1. (Resident R1)Findings Include:Review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) states, Position Summary-this position is responsible to establish and maintain systems that are efficient and effective to operate the nursing home in a manner to safely meet resident's needs in accordance with federal, state and local regulations. Also, develop and maintain systems that are effective and efficient to operate the facility in a financially sound manner.Further review of the NHA job description revealed, Essential Duties and Responsibilities-. Develop, maintain and implement operational policies and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable, and home-like interior one of two nursing units (2nd floor). Findings include: The grievance log documented on May 4, 2025, environmental concerns pertaining to lack of cleanliness in the building and overflowing trash. Observation in Resident 8's room on July 14, 2025, at 2:25 PM: the trash can at the sink was overflowing; one package of wipes under Resident 8's bed and brown food crumbs on the floor around the bed; a white powdery film on the night stand (able to be wiped away with a paper towel); the baseboard to the right of the door had a dried brown substance; behind the door were 2 enabler bars, a dusty blue foam square cushion and a headboard from Resident 8's bed; and the windowsill contained a white film and dried watermarks around the plants. Resident 8 stated that her room has not been cleaned by housekeeping since July 10th, and nursing staff have not emptied the trash can at the sink. Observation with the Nursing Home Administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for two of 6 resident clinical records reviewed (Residents 2 and 6).Clinical record review of Resident 2 documented diagnoses that included: metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disorder caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood stemming from an underlying illness or organ dysfunction), diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine), obesity, frequent falls, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung disease that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), atrial fibrillation (irregular, often rapid heart rate that causes poor blood flow), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), congestive heart failure (the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's need), and shortness of breath. Review of Resident 2's Medication Administration Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$144,615 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

• $109,350 — penalty dated 2026-02-04
• $13,260 — penalty dated 2025-12-22
• $13,987 — penalty dated 2025-05-22
• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-04-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $265K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA