Guy And Mary Felt Manor, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 28.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.04 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.17 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medications for two of five residents reviewed for medication regime concerns (Residents 2 and 4).Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Psychotropic Medication Use, last reviewed January 29, 2026, revealed that the purpose of the policy included to provide consistent monitoring of usage of medications to ensure each resident is receiving the medication that he/she needs without being overmedicated. Residents will not receive psychotropic medications unless behavioral programming and/or environmental changes or other non-pharmacological interventions have failed to sufficiently address the resident's target behavioral goals. The facility will monitor psychotropic medications for proper dose, duration, evidence of adequate monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences and to prevent, identify, and respond to adverse consequences. As needed (PRN)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's main kitchen.Findings include: Observation of the facility's main kitchen on Monday, June 1, 2026, at 10:45 AM, revealed the following: A package of fig snack bars in the kitchen production area with no date to indicate a receive or used by date. A plastic container labelled [NAME] cheese in the freezer with no date received, opened, or when it expires. A plastic bag in the freezer containing a product that resembled frozen grilled chicken. The bag was not labeled to indicate the contents and the date on the product noted in marker was not legible. A tray of multiple frozen dessert resembling sherbert on a shelf in the freezer was not labeled to identify the product and there were no dates to indicate when it was placed there or when it needed to be used by. The walk-in cooler contained a bottle of lemon juice labeled with two dates…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment free from the potential spread of infection related to laundry processing (Residents 4, 7, 22, and 26) and the accessibility of hand hygiene materials in the laundry department. The facility also failed to implement measures to ensure an effective Water Management Program for the prevention and control of water-borne contaminants, such as Legionella (a bacteria that may cause Legionnaires' Disease, a serious type of pneumonia).Findings include: Interview with Employee 4 (nurse aide) on June 3, 2026, at 9:13 AM revealed that laundry staff collect residents' soiled personal laundry on a schedule set by the laundry department. Residents' soiled personal laundry is stored in a hamper in their closet until laundry staff collect it. Observation of Resident 22's room on June 3, 2026, at 9:14 AM with Employee 4 revealed that Resident 22's closet contained too many of her personal possessions to accommodate a clothing hamper.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an assessment accurately reflected a resident's status for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident 9).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 9 revealed social services documentation dated January 20, 2026, at 10:56 AM that admission paperwork was completed; and that Resident 9 wore dentures. Review of an admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated January 20, 2026, assessed that Resident 9 was not edentulous (that she had natural teeth). Task documentation (electronic information recorded by nurse aide staff regarding care needs) dated May 2026, indicated that Resident 9's oral hygiene was, Oral Hygiene full upper and lower dentures. Interview with Employee 4 (nurse aide) on June 3, 2026, at 9:38 AM confirmed that Resident 9 did not have natural teeth. Interview with the Director of Nursing, Nursing Home Administrator, and Employee 3 (registered nurse assessment coordinator) on June…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and resident, family, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dependent resident with activities of daily living assistance for two of two residents reviewed (Residents 6 and 9). Findings include: The policy entitled Podiatry Care, last reviewed without changes January 29, 2026, revealed to ensure that residents receive proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health, the facility must provide foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, including to prevent complications from the resident's medical condition and if necessary assist the resident in making appointments with a qualified person, and arranging for transportation to and from such appointments. It is the policy of the facility that podiatry procedures for routine foot care and diabetic foot care. Routine foot care may include corns, calluses, and trimming of nails and is limited to every two months. During an interview with Resident 6 on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to implement treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities for one of one resident reviewed for vision concerns (Resident 6).Findings include: Interview with Resident 6 on June 1, 2026, at 12:36 PM revealed that she has a pair of glasses that she has had for a long time and they no longer work for her. She stated that she would like to see an eye doctor. Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 6 on November 5, 2024, with an order for an optometry consult and care as needed. During a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on June 2, 2026, at 11:05 AM the surveyor requested any evidence of the facility offering Resident 6 professional ophthalmology services since admission to the facility in November 2024. Social service documentation dated June 3, 2026, at 11:52 AM revealed social services reviewed vision needs and preferences with Resident 6. Resident 6 reported a desire to be seen for her vision needs.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain a resident's range of motion for two of three residents reviewed for ROM concerns (Residents 12 and 14). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 12 on January 6, 2025. Review of Resident 12's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated January 13, 2025, noted staff assessed Resident 12 as having no impairment to her range of motion (ROM, movement of the body to maintain a resident's ability) of her bilateral upper and lower extremities. Review of 12's next quarterly MDS dated [DATE], noted staff assessed Resident 12 as having declined, with bilateral impairments to her upper and lower extremities. Review of Resident 12's physical therapy documentation revealed that she was discharged from therapy on April 10, 2025. There was no evidence that the facility addressed Resident 12's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) standards, clinical record review, review of personnel payroll records, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment free from the potential spread of infection related to COVID-19 work exclusions for two of two employees reviewed (Employees 3 and 4), COVID-19 outbreak testing for three of three episodes of facility COVID-19 outbreaks (July 29, 2024, to August 3, 2024; September 16, 2024; and February 9, 2025); transmission based precautions for one of one resident identified on transmission based precautions (Resident 22); enhanced barrier precautions for one of two residents observed for wound care (Resident 10); a process to obtain pertinent information following acute care hospital treatment for one of one resident reviewed for urinary tract infections (Resident 22); and resident personal laundry processing (Residents 11, 17, 15, 13, and 23). Findings include: Centers for Disease Control criteria for staff to return…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer pneumococcal vaccines to three of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents 20, 2, and 11). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Pneumococcal Vaccines (PCV13, PCV20, and PPSV23) of Residents, last reviewed January 29, 2025, revealed that the purpose of the policy is to reduce morbidity and mortality from pneumococcal disease by vaccinating all residents who meet the criteria established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. All residents of the facility should receive the pneumococcal vaccine (PCV13, PCV20, and/or PPSV23), unless there is a documented contraindication or right of refusal. The infection preventionist/designee will be responsible to monitor the facility's pneumococcal immunization program. Residents will have their immunization status determined at the time of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to establish clear and consistent resident wishes regarding advance directives for two of four residents reviewed for advance directive concerns (Residents 11 and 22). Findings include: Clinical record review of Resident 11's physical chart revealed a POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment, portable medical order form that records residents' treatment wishes so that emergency personnel know what treatment the resident wants in the event of a medical emergency) signed by a physician on [DATE], and signed by Resident 11 that indicated Resident 11 desired CPR (Full Code, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, chest compressions and artificial breathing assistance upon a medical emergency and/or death); however, limited other interventions such as refusing intubation (DNI, do not insert a tube into the airway to help with breathing). Review of active physician orders in Resident 11's electronic medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA