Paramount Nursing And Rehab At Fayetteville, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 134 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 7.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 85.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, select facility document review, policy review, review of diet guidelines, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet the needs of each resident for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident 1 as evidenced by a delay in provision of emergency services which resulted in death.Findings include:Review of facility policy, titled Emergency Procedure-Choking, with a last review date of January 23, 2025, revealed the following, in part, Trained staff will assist the resident which is choking by attempting to expel the foreign body from the airway. Conscious Resident-Standing or Sitting:1. Ask the resident if he or she is choking. Remember, a choking victim cannot speak or breathe and needs your help immediately. 4. Call for help, but stay with the resident. 6. If the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, select facility document review, review of diet guidelines, review of select resident meal tray tickets, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents based on individual needs for one resident (Resident 1), which resulted in Resident 1 choking. This failure placed nine residents that had similar diet needs at a high risk for death and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation (Resident 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14).Findings include:Review of facility document, titled Mechanically Altered Diets, last reviewed January 23, 2025, read, in part, Dysphagia Diet Level 2: Level 2 can tolerate (most of the time) this texture as it should be the easiest to maneuver and safe to swallow. Mechanically altered food should be very small in size, soft, and with extra moisture added.Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients the body needs to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a residents medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications and failed to ensure that residents received adequate monitoring of psychotropic medications for three of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 41, 66, and 67). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Psychoactive Drug Monitoring Policy, undated, with a last review date of January 23, 2025, revealed It is the policy of the Skilled Unit of Paramount Nursing and Rehabilitation at Fayetteville, LLC. to monitor Residents who receive antidepressant, hypnotic, antianxiety, or antipsychotic medications. The purpose was identified as to evaluate the effectiveness of the medication and to ensure that residents receiving these medications obtain the maximum benefit with the minimum of untoward effects. In addition, 1) Residents receive a psychoactive medication only if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for three of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 37, 41, and 67). Findings include: Review of Resident 37's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (death of brain tissue caused by a disruption in blood flow) and paraplegia (inability to move the lower part of the body). Review of Resident 37's quarterly minimum data set (MDS - assessment tool utilized to identify a residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial needs) dated April 16, 2025, revealed Resident 37 was coded as receiving anticoagulant medication. Review of Resident 37's current and discontinued physician orders failed to reveal Resident 37 had been ordered anticoagulant medication. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) on June 4, 2025, at 2:02 PM, it was revealed that Resident 37's quarterly MDS assessment had been coded incorrectly and a modification had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed for three of 18 residents reviewed (Residents 5, 41, and 66). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Care Plan Policy, last reviewed January 23, 2025, read, in part, .to develop and maintain a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that include, but are not limited to, those identified in the comprehensive assessment . Using the initial plan of care, any updates, the comprehensive assessment and the resultant CAA investigations, the interdisciplinary team will meet with the resident and the resident's family or representative, as appropriate, and develop quantifiable objectives for the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain - physically, mentally, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter care was completed for three of four residents reviewed with urinary catheters (Residents 1, 21, and 41). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Prevention of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections, last reviewed January 23, 2025, under Catheter Care section stated, daily catheter care should be documented in the resident's EHR (electronic health record). Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included obstructive uropathy (a urinary tract disorder that occurs when urine flow is obstructed) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy). Physician orders dated August 2024 through June 2025 identified that Resident 1 had an indwelling urinary catheter in place with a 16 French catheter and 10 milliliter filled balloon to maintain placement. Physician orders also stated catheter care was to be performed daily on every shift. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0699 — pattern
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 37). Findings include: Review of Resident 37's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included paraplegia (inability to voluntarily move the lower parts of the body) and depression (persistent feeling of sadness, loss of interest, or both, that interferes with daily life activities). During an interview with Resident 37 on June 2, 2025 at 12:09 PM, Resident 37 revealed that at the age of 19 he was the only survivor of a plane crash. Resident 37 also revealed he was severely injured in the crash, which resulted in him being paralyzed from the waste down. Further review of Resident 37's clinical record failed to reveal documentation that any trauma screening had been done. Email…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food/beverages and utilize equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the kitchen and in one of one nourishment refrigerators. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Food Storage/Refrigerators, with a last revised date of June 20, 2017, and a last review date of January 23, 2025, revealed, in part, 5. Foods must be stored in appropriate containers; covered, labels, and dated. 6. All food items must be stored 6 inches off the floor. Review of facility policy, titled Food Storage/Dry Storage, with a last revised date of June 20, 2017, and a last review date of January 23, 2025, revealed, in part, 1. All foods or food items not requiring refrigeration shall be stored at least 6 inches off the floor and 18 inches from the ceiling. 2. Items must be stored on a surface, which facilitates thorough cleaning. 4. All items are stored and issued on a first in/first out rotation. All cans must be dated. 7. Any opened items must…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise the resident plan of care for two of 18 residents reviewed (Residents 41 and 67). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plan Policy with a last revised date of February 20, 2020, and a last review date of January 23, 2025, revealed The Care Plan will be updated on an ongoing basis by the charge nurse whenever new nursing orders are received and/or any changes in condition with the resident. Review of Resident 41's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure) and chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (heart failure that occurs when the heart does not relax properly between beats, causing the heart to be unable to pump an adequate amount of blood to the body). Review of Resident 41's physician orders revealed an order for fluid restriction of 2000 ml (milliliters) in 24 hours. Review of Resident 41's care plan revealed in his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (upper chambers [atria] of the heart beat rapidly and irregularly) and congestive heart failure (condition where the heart muscle is weakened and cannot pump blood effectively). Review of Resident 1's comprehensive plan of care revealed focus areas for ADLs (activities of daily living) and falls. Further review of Resident 1's care plan failed to include an intervention that indicated Resident 1's level of assistance required for ADL care. During an in interview on March 10, 2025 at 2:15 PM, with the Director of Nursing it was revealed that assistance type and level should be indicated on the Resident's care plan. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3)(5) Nursing services

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and home-like environment for two of 20 residents observed (Residents 35 and 54). Findings include: Observations of Resident 35's room on July 1, 2024, at 9:59 AM, and July 2, 2024, at 11:51 AM, revealed a pedestal fan with gray fuzzy debris on the blades and blowing from the front of the fan. Observations of Resident 54's room on July 1, 2024, at 11:18 AM, and July 2, 2024, at 11:52 AM, revealed a small fan sitting on a nightstand with gray fuzzy debris on the blades and blowing from the front of the fan. In an email communication received from the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on July 3, 2024, at 9:08 AM, the NHA revealed that the facility did not have a policy on the cleaning of fans. She further indicated that she had spoken to the housekeeping manager and that the cleaning of fans had now been added to the monthly resident room deep clean list. She also indicated that the housekeeping staff had cleaned all facility fans. In an interview with the NHA on July 3,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to promote healing and prevent worsening of pressure ulcers for one of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 56). Findings include: Review of Resident 56's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included stage 4 pressure ulcer of the right heel (wound that occurs when the skin and tissue are damaged by prolonged pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time leading to breakdown of skin and sometimes deeper tissues), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 56's physician orders revealed an order for Heels up when in bed, with a start date of March 29, 2024. Further review of Resident 56's physician orders revealed an order for Offloading boot to be worn in bed to RLE (right lower extremity), with a start date of April 2, 2024. Review of Resident 56's weekly wound consultation notes revealed recommendations from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,345 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,672 — penalty dated 2025-10-06
• $8,673 — penalty dated 2025-10-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $516K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA