Caring Place, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 110 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 94.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation and clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of three residents reviewed (Resident R2) was free from neglect during care which resulted in actual harm of a left femur (upper leg) fracture. This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Abuse Prohibition dated 5/27/25, revealed that, Neglect is the failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Neglect refers to failure through inattentiveness, carelessness, or omission to provide timely, consistent, safety, adequate, and appropriate services, treatment and care, including but not limited to: nutrition, medication, therapies, and activities of daily living. Resident R2's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/21/21, with diagnoses including stroke, Parkinson's Disease (brain disorder that causes gradual, progressive damage to parts of the brain over many years), and muscle weakness. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documentation and clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately transfer a resident as identified in the plan of care for two of three residents reviewed (Residents R2 and R3), with one transfer which resulted in actual harm of a left femur (upper leg) fracture for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R2). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: Resident R3's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/20/25, with diagnoses that included respiratory failure, muscle weakness, abnormal gait and mobility, and need for personal care assistance. Resident R3's Admission/re-admission Nursing Evaluation Section 4 dated 3/20/25, revealed that he/she required the assistance of two staff to transfer. A Physical Therapy evaluation dated 3/20/25, indicated that Resident R3's baseline (starting) transfer ability was with moderate assistance of two. An Occupational Therapy evaluation dated 3/20/25, indicated that Resident R3's baseline toileting ability was toileting in bed, total…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, facility documentation and review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately transfer a resident to ensure the resident was free from neglect which resulted in actual harm of a fracture of the right humeral head of the right shoulder for one of 13 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: The Mechanical Lifts and Slings policy, dated 2/05/24, revealed, Mechanical lift transfer status will be maintained indicating the use of a full mechanical lift or sit to stand mechanical lift. Transfer Status will also be documented in the Plan of Care. Two or more aides must be used for all full mechanical lift transfers. The Identifying Resident Neglect policy, dated 2/05/24, revealed, Neglect includes cases where the facility's indifference to or disregard for resident care, comfort, or safety results in (or could have resulted in) physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. A review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/13/23, with diagnoses that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-02 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer to the hospital and failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day), for five of six residents reviewed (Residents R2, R5, R43, R55, and R94).Findings include:Review of facility policy entitled Transfer/Discharge - Emergency dated 1/14/26, indicated Should it become necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a hospital or other related institution, our facility will implement the following procedures:Notify the resident's attending physicianNotify the receiving facility.Prepare the resident for transferPrepare a transfer form to send with the residentNotify the representative.Assist in obtaining transportOthers as appropriate or as necessaryReview of facility policy entitled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-07-02 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for five of 30 residents reviewed (Residents R10, R39, R42, R55, and R79).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Baseline Care Plan dated 1/14/26, revealed, The resident and their representative will be provided a summary of the baseline care plan that includes, but is not limited to the following:The initial goals of the resident;A summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions;Any services and treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility; andAny updated information based on the details of the comprehensive care plan, as necessary. Review of Resident R10's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/24/25, with diagnoses including closed fracture with routine healing (right hip fracture), dementia (a disease that causes memory loss, cognitive decline, and behavior changes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clinical rationale for the continued use of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic (affecting the mind) medication beyond 14-days and failed to provide evidence that non-pharmacological interventions (interventions attempted to calm a resident other than medication) were attempted prior to the administration of a PRN psychotropic medication for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R8). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Psychotropic Medication Use dated 1/14/26, revealed Non-pharmacological approaches are used (unless contraindicated) to minimize the need for medications, permit the lowest possible dose, and allow for discontinuation of medications when possible. Residents on psychotropic medications receive gradual dose reductions (coupled with non-pharmacological interventions), unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these medications., and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records, facility policy and documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to perform a transfer in a safe manner for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident R62).Findings include: A facility policy entitled Resident Transfer Status dated 1/14/26, indicated that resident transfer status will be communicated to all nursing staff through Activity of Daily Living (ADL) flow sheets, assignment sheet, electronic health record (task list, Kardex), etc. Resident R62's clinical record revealed an admission date of 2/14/25, with diagnoses including heart disease, muscle weakness, abnormal gait and mobility, need for assistance with personal care, and a history of falling. Resident R62's clinical record included a Fall Risk Evaluation dated 5/19/26, which indicated that he/she was always alert to person, place, time and situation; that resident was in a chair all or most of time and oriented; was unable to independently come to a standing position; a resulted in a score of six (borderline moderate risk). Resident R62's care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, manufacturer's guidelines, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were properly dated when opened in one of two medication rooms reviewed (First Floor Main Medication Room). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Labeling of Medication Containers dated 1/14/26, revealed Labels for stock medications include all necessary information such as:.d. the expiration date when applicable. Manufacturer's recommendations for Tubersol PPD (solution used for tuberculosis testing upon admission and for employment), indicated that vials which are entered and in use for 30 days should be discarded. Observation on 6/29/26, at 10:32 a.m. of the First Floor Main Medication room refrigerator revealed an opened vial of Tubersol without an open date, therefore staff were unable to determine the expiration date. At that time, the Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the open vial of Tubersol lacked an open date. 28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy services 28 Pa. Code 211.10(c) Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and documents, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have adequate housekeeping staff to maintain clean and sanitary hallways on two of two floors observed and clean and sanitary resident rooms on one of two floors observed.Findings include: Facility policy entitled, Homelike Environment dated 5/27/25, revealed Residents are provided with a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment.The facility staff and management maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include.clean, sanitary, and orderly environment. Review of the facility grievance logs revealed a grievance dated 11/13/25, that the resident's room was not being cleaned appropriately. Review of housekeeping schedules from 12/28/25, through 1/24/26, revealed several days with only one housekeeper scheduled for the entire 100 bed facility, which included resident rooms, bathrooms, common areas, hallways, and offices. Observations made…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately discard outdated medications for two of four medication carts reviewed and one of two medication rooms reviewed (first floor C-wing and second floor C-wing medication carts and second floor medication room).Review of facility policy entitled Medication Storage and Handling dated [DATE], indicated Medications will be monitored. to assure that they are not expired. Review of facility policy entitled Administering Medications dated [DATE], indicated When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container. Review of Active liquid protein label indicated three-month shelf life from date open. Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that an open pen of Lispro Insulin must be used within 28 days after opening or be discarded. Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that an open vial of Lantus Insulin must be used within 28 days after opening or be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day), failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer, and failed to have complete documentation related to a transfer for three of 20 residents reviewed (Residents R3, R31, and R105). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled “Bed Hold Notice” dated 2/18/25, indicated “In the event a resident is transferred for hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the facility shall… review its bed hold policy with the resident and/or designated resident representative. This review shall be accomplished at or prior to transfer.” Review of facility policy entitled “Transfer/Discharge Documentation” dated 2/18/25, indicated “Should a resident be transferred or discharged for any reason, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide oxygen and change/date oxygen tubing according to physician's orders for two of two residents reviewed for respiratory services (Residents R45 and R58).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Oxygen dated 2/18/25, indicated There must be a Physician's Order for oxygen use which includes the route and liter flow. Resident R45's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/6/25, with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic respiratory failure, and muscle weakness. Additional review of the physician's orders revealed an order that reads change and date oxygen tubing weekly every night shift every Thurs. Observation on 7/16/25, at 9:21 a.m. revealed Resident R45's nasal cannula (oxygen tubing that has prongs that go into the nostrils and loops around the ears to secure in place to ensure adequate oxygen delivery) was not dated. It was also noted that the humidifier solution cannister, which is attached…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician's orders for residents receiving dialysis (method of mechanically cleaning the blood) for one of two residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident R12).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Administering Medications, dated 2/18/25, indicated that medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. The policy also indicated that if there were any concerns regarding the medications the prescriber would be contacted to discuss the concerns. Review of Resident R12's clinical record revealed an admission date of 2/22/25, with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, type II diabetes ( the body does not make enough insulin to control blood sugar), and end stage renal disease with dependance on renal dialysis, which required being away from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-11-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $323K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA