Orchard Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 99.6 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy and documentation, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement sufficient monitoring interventions and supervision to prevent elopement (unauthorized leave from the facility). This failure placed residents at the facility in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one of two residents reviewed who eloped from the facility (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Safety and Supervision of Residents dated 4/1/25, indicated Our facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities. Our facility-oriented approach to safety address risks for groups of residents. Safety risks and environmental hazards are identified on an ongoing basis through a combination of employee training, employee monitoring and reporting process; Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, facility policies and facility documentation, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision that resulted in actual harm including a laceration requiring seven sutures (stitches to close a wound), head injury, and skin tear of forearm, to one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Comprehensive Care Plan dated 3/13/23, revealed that the care plan will describe at a minimum, the following: (a) the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the Resident's highest practical physical, mental and psychosocial well being . 6. Qualified staff responsible for carrying out interventions specified in the care plan will be notified of their roles and responsibilities for carrying out the interventions, initially and when changes are made. Review of the facility policy entitled, Fall Prevention Program dated 3/13/23, revealed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical and facility records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation related to incidents and accidents for three of five residents reviewed (Residents R2, R3, and R4). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Incident Reporting dated 3/12/26, revealed the purpose of this policy is to ensure that all incidents involving residents, staff, visitors, or facility operations are promptly identified, investigated, documented, and reported in accordance with federal regulations, state law, and facility standards to protect resident health, safety, and rights. All employees are responsible for immediately reporting incidents, accidents, injuries, abuse allegations, neglect, exploitation, medication errors, elopements, and other unusual occurrences involving residents or facility operations. Immediate Response - Staff discovering an incident shall: Ensure resident safety. Provide first aid or emergency care as needed. Notify the charge nurse immediately. Contact emergency services if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of one closed records reviewed (Resident CR1). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: Facility policy entitled, Medication Administration dated 3/12/26, revealed the policy establishes the standards and procedures for the safe and accurate administration of medications to residents of the facility. The Five Rights of Medication Administration - Prior to administering any medication, the licensed nurse must verify all of the following: Right Resident - Verify the resident's identity using at least two identifiers (name and date of birth or room number) and confirm against the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Right Medication - Confirm the medication name matches the current physician order and the MAR. Right Dose - Verify the dose is consistent with the current order and within safe parameters. Right Route - Confirm the route of administration matches the order (oral, topical, injectable, etc).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an elopement for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting dated 4/1/25, revealed all accidents or incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors etc , occurring on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the Administrator. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/28/2025, with diagnoses that included dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities), Parkinson's disease (brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone), and high blood pressure. During an onsite investigation on 12/15/25, it was identified that Resident R1 had eloped from the dementia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility records and job descriptions, and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) failed to effectively manage the facility to make certain that proper supervision and elopement prevention were effectively implemented in the facility. Findings include: Review of the job description for the NHA revealed The administrator is charged with the general administration of the facility; Manage subordinate supervisors who supervise all employees in all departments; Responsible for the overall direction, coordination, and evaluation of these units; and directly or through delegation, carries out supervisory responsibilities in accordance with the facility's policies and applicable laws. Based on the findings in this report that identified the facility failed to consistently supervise and maintain all safety interventions to prevent elopement for their residents, the NHA failed to fulfill their essential job duties to ensure that the Federal and State guidelines and Regulations were followed. Refer to F689 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to reflect the current care and services for one of three residents reviewed (Residents R1).Findings include:Review of facility policy entitled Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change dated 4/1/25, indicated The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 2/23/23, with diagnoses that included dementia (a disease that affects short term memory and the ability to think logically), repeated falls, need for assistance with personal care, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R1's current care plans revealed a risk for falls care plan with an intervention for a pressure sensor pad alarm at all times while resident is in bed and to check placement and function every shift. Review of Resident R1's current physician orders revealed no order for a pressure sensor pad alarm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have complete and accurate documentation regarding activities of daily living (ADLs) and interventions for three of three residents reviewed. (Residents R1, R2, and R3).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Charting and Documentation dated 4/1/25, indicated All services provided to the resident. shall be documented in the resident's medical record.Documentation in the medical record will be objective, complete, and accurate . Review of policy entitled Activities of Daily Living dated 4/1/25, indicated Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, grooming. eating including meals and snacks. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 2/23/23, with diagnoses that included dementia (a disease that affects short term memory and the ability to think logically), repeated falls, need for assistance with personal care, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R1's discontinued…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident and/or his/her representative with a summary of the baseline care plan including physician's orders and medications for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R60). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Care Plans - Baseline dated 4/01/25, revealed a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. To assure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within forty-eight (48) hours of the resident's admission. The interdisciplinary team will review the healthcare practitioner's orders (e.g., dietary needs, medications, routine treatments, etc.) and implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate care needs including, but not limited to the following: Initial goals based on admission orders; Physician orders; Dietary orders; Therapy services, Social services; and PASARR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide oxygen and change/date of oxygen tubing according to physician's orders for one of two residents reviewed for respiratory services (Resident R26).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Oxygen Administration Procedure dated 4/1/25, indicated Nasal Cannula: generally replaced every 7 days and when visibly soiled or compromised, and Tubing (extension/primary): usually every 14 days unless visibly soiled, cracked, or per manufacturer's guidance. Resident R26's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/31/23, with diagnoses that included Atrial Fibrillation (A-Fib - irregular and often rapid heartbeat that can lead to stroke, heart failure, and other complications), heart failure (condition when your heart does not pump the blood as well resulting in difficulty breathing, tiredness, and swelling), and high blood pressure. Resident R26's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 8/29/25, for oxygen at two liters per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, manufacturer's recommendations, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly dated when opened and discarded in a timely manner for one of three medication carts reviewed (B Wing medication cart 2). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Labeling of Medication Containers dated 4/01/25, revealed all medications maintained in the facility are properly labeled in accordance with current state and federal guidelines and regulations. Manufacturer's recommendations for Humalog insulin (a type of short-acting insulin), indicated that an opened multiple-dose vial stored at room temperature should be discarded after 28 days. Observations of the B Wing's medication cart 2 on 9/02/25, at 2:10 p.m. revealed an opened vial of Humalog insulin without an open date, therefore the staff were unable to determine the discard date. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed at that time, that the opened Humalog insulin vial lacked an opened date, and staff were unable to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assure a physician's order was completed to indicate the code status as Full Code (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation-CPR/Attempt Resuscitation) or Do Not Resuscitate (DNR/Do Not Attempt Resuscitation-Allow Natural Death) for four of 19 residents reviewed (Residents R56, R58, R65, and R225). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Patient Self Determination Act / Resident Rights dated [DATE], indicated The Attending Physician will write an order for any valid Advanced Directive on the Physician Order sheet and document on the progress notes. Resident R56's clinical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], with diagnoses that included dislocated left hip, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a condition that obstructs air flow in the lungs with symptoms of difficulty breathing, coughing, and wheezing) and neurogenic bladder (disorder where normal bladder function is disrupted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,556 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $9,113 — penalty dated 2025-12-09
• $7,443 — penalty dated 2023-09-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA