No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hanover Hall For Nursing And Rehabilitation

267 Frederick Street, Hanover, PA 17331 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 151 certified beds · (717) 637-8937 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (717) 637-8937 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Jan 20261 actual-harm citation2 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
100 Frederick St Ste 101 · (717) 851-7050 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.3 mi
43-47 Baltimore St · (717) 632-5490 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7 Center Sq · (717) 688-7151 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Wirt Park0.3 mi
201 N Franklin St · (717) 637-6671 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.3%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.7%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.3%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.4%10.8%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.5%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.4%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.5%20.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.5%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.9%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.5%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.9%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine46.4%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.6%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.2%9.5%12.0%better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.0%CMS range 27.3–49.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 9.2–17.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge38.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting81.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.0–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.90
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.50
RN hoursweekends
56.9%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 151 beds and averages 114.3 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-14)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, hospital records, staff interviews, and review of the facility incident report, it was determined that the facility displayed past non-compliance in it's failure to ensure that care and services were provided timely and consistent with professional standards of practice following a fall with fracture which resulted in harm as evidenced by fracture-related pain and delayed corrective treatment for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, titled Falls Management System, last reviewed July 25, 2025, stated the following: Any fall that involves an actual head injury and all un-witnessed falls will include follow-up neurological checks. Neurological checks will be documented. The investigation and appropriate interventions will be evaluated at the time of the fall and reviewed by Nursing Management or the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT). When the resident sustains a fall, an evaluation for injury by a licensed nurse is completed and the results are documented in the clinical record. The attending physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2026-01-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor a resident's weight status in accordance with facility policy and clinical standards of practice for three of five residents reviewed (Residents 5, 8, and 85). And failed to consistently monitor a resident's weight status and implement timely interventions to maintain adequate weight resulting in actual harm as evidenced by continued weight loss for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 8).Findings include:Review of facility policy, titled Weight Assessment and Intervention, revised March 2019, read, in part, the nursing staff will measure residents' weight on admission, and then weekly for four weeks. Any weight change of 5 pounds or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will notify the Physician and Dietitian.Review of the facility's policy, titled Weight Assessment and Interventions, revised March 2019,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-07-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, facility document review, hospital record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility displayed past non-compliance by failing to ensure that residents were free from any significant medication errors, which resulted in actual harm, as evidenced by low blood pressure, low heart rate, sweating, lightheadedness, and hospital transfer, for one of two residents (Resident 1). Findings Include:Review of facility policy, titled Administering Medications, last revised April 2019, indicated medications are administered by licensed nurses or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state.The policy states:Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame.The individual administering medications verifies the resident's identity before giving the resident his/her medications. Methods of identifying the resident include:a. Checking identification bandb. Checking photograph attached…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed at least once every 12 months for three of five nurse aides reviewed (Employee 7, 8, and 9).Findings include:Review of facility job description documentation for nurse aides revealed annual evaluations are to be completed by their supervisor. Review of select facility documentation revealed a list of nurse aides that had worked at the facility for greater than a year. Employees 7, 8, and 9 were selected from the list to review their last annual nurse aide performance evaluations.Review of Employee 7's last annual nurse aide performance evaluation provided revealed it was dated October 11, 2022. Review of Employee 8's last annual nurse aide performance evaluation provided revealed it was dated July 18, 2023. Review of select facility documentation provided revealed Employee 9 had a hire date of August 19, 2024. Employee 9 did not have an annual evaluation in 2025 for review. During an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the drug regimen of each resident was reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist, and failed to ensure any irregularities were responded to in a timely manner by the attending physician or prescriber for three of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 2, 11, and 56).Findings include:Review of facility policy, titled Medication Regimen Review (Monthly Report), last reviewed July 25, 2025, read, in part, The consultant pharmacist performs a comprehensive medication regimen review (MRR) at least monthly. Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and or the prescriber.Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included gastro esophageal reflux disease (a chronic digestive disease where the liquid content of the stomach refluxes into the esophagus, the tube connecting the mouth and stomach), hyperlipidemia (high blood cholesterol), and dementia (a general term for severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food/beverages in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the kitchen and in four of four nourishment pantries. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Food Storage, revised February 15, 2020, read, in part, un-served leftovers shall be labeled, dated and stored for a period not to exceed three days, bulk items should be labeled and dated clearly and appropriately. All foods should be covered, labeled and dated. When taking dietary supplements out of the freezer to defrost, they should be labelled with a use by date. Health shakes/Nutritious juice are to be used within 14 days. Review of facility policy, titled Food from Outside Sources, revised July 2023, read, in part, visitors will label food and beverages with the resident's name, room number and date. Observation in the walk-in Freezer with Employee 6 on January 11, 2026, at 10:48 AM, revealed one and a half frozen pizzas were in an open plastic bag and not date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident the right to formulate an advance directive for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 39).Findings Include: An Advance Directive is defined as a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. Review of the facility's policy, titled Advance Directives, revised September 2022, reads, in part, 1. Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquires of the resident, his/her family members, and/or his or her legal representative, about the existence of any written advance directives. 2. The resident or representative is provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. 3. Written information about the right to accept or refuse medical or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide side effect monitoring for one of five residents reviewed (Residents 56). Findings include:Review of facility provided policy, titled Policy for Psychotropic Medication Use, revised February 2025, revealed, Residents receiving psychotropic medication are monitored and the response to treatment is documented.Review of Resident 56's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included down syndrome (a genetic condition caused by having an extra copy of chromosome 21, affecting brain and body development) and dementia (a general term for severe mental function loss).Review of Resident 56's physician orders revealed an order for Risperidone (antipsychotic medication) 0.25 mg, given by mouth, twice daily, starting on December 2, 2025.Review of Resident 56's Care plan revealed a focus are of, the Resident uses psychotropic medications, with a date initiated of November 3, 2025, an intervention to monitor/record/report to MD, as needed, side effects of antipsychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for two of 23 residents reviewed (Residents 39 and 75).Findings Include:Review of the facility's policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, read, in part, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physician, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident.Review of Resident 39's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body, affecting the arm, leg, and sometimes face, making it difficult to perform daily tasks like walking or grasping objects, often due to brain damage from conditions like stroke, tumors, or injury).An observation of Resident 39 in his bed on January 11, 2026, at 11:05 AM, revealed bilateral enabler bars attached to his bed. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for one resident reviewed (Resident 94). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Administering Medications, last reviewed July 25, 2025, read, in part, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Review of Resident 94's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included gastro esophageal reflux disease (a chronic digestive disease where the liquid content of the stomach refluxes into the esophagus, the tube connecting the mouth and stomach), muscle weakness, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Observation in Resident 94's room January 11, 2026, at 11:10 AM, revealed a cup containing 11 medications on her bedside table.During an interview with Employee 4 (Licensed Practical Nurse) on January 11, 2026, at 11:11 AM, the surveyor inquired about the medications being left at Resident 94's bedside. Employee 4 stated when she went to pass Resident 94's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select Resident Council meeting minutes, resident and staff interviews, observations, and completion of one meal test tray, it was determined that the facility failed to provide foods that are palatable, attractive, and at appetizing temperatures. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council Meeting minutes for October 29th, 2025, and December 26, 2025, revealed residents voiced concerns with cold food and dry meat. During the initial pool process, Residents 75, 97, and 107 voiced concerns about the meals to include food temperature, texture, taste, and portion size. Review of the Culinary and Nutrition Test [NAME] form, not dated, documented point of service temperatures as follows: hot entree and starch greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F), cold entree and dessert less than 41 degrees F. A test tray completed on January 12, 2026, revealed adequate portions size for all meal items; however, the chicken tenders, mixed vegetables, and potato salad weren't palatable for temperature, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to develop a timely hospice baseline care plan, document a hospice physician order, or have an authorized hospice agreement for one of three residents reviewed for hospice services (Resident 13).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Hospice Program, last reviewed July 25, 2025, stated, the agreement with the hospital provider will be signed by the facility representative and a representative from the hospice agency before hospice services are furnished to the resident. Review of the clinical record for Resident 13 revealed clinical diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (a.k.a. stroke-brain tissue death from a blocked blood vessel), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), and hospice status (end of life services focusing on comfort, pain management, and quality of life when a cure isn't possible). Review of Resident 13's admission Minimum Date Set (MDS-periodic assessment and care screening) dated December 3, 2025, reveals a BIMS (brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain adequate personal hygiene and grooming of residents who are dependent on staff for assistance with these activities of daily living for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 2 and 3).Findings include: Review of Resident 2's clinical record documented diagnoses that included anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease), depression (feelings of severe despondency and dejection), Alzheimer's disease (brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, eventually affecting the ability to carry out daily tasks), vascular dementia (a condition characterized by progressive loss of intellectual functioning, impairment of memory and abstract thinking), bipolar (a mental health condition alternating periods of elation and depression), and hallucinations (a false perception of sight, sound, smell [NAME] or touch that seems real but has no externa stimulus). Further clinical record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a urinalysis and urine culture and sensitivity were completed timely for one of two resident records reviewed (Resident 4).Findings include:Review of Resident 4 clinical record revealed diagnoses that included history of urinary tract infection.Review of Resident 4's physician orders included: obtain UA (urinalysis) C&S (culture and sensitivity) one time only for 2 Days, started October 7, 2025, at 5:30 PM.Review of the Medication Administration Record documented 15 (resident refused and requested the urine be collected on day shift) on December 7th, 2025.Further review of the physician orders included obtain UA/ C&S discontinue once completed, started October 13th, 2025, at 3:00 PM, and discontinued October 13th, 2025, at 4:39 PM.Review of the urinalysis report dated October 13, 2025, at 6:20 PM, revealed the specimen was taken October 13th, 2025, at 10:19 AM, was received at 3:57 PM, and the result was available at 4:22 PM. The results revealed urine appeared turbid, trace…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed for each resident for two of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 63 and 99). Findings include: Review of Resident 63's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included quadriplegia (partial or total loss of use of all four limbs) and muscle weakness. Observation of Resident 63 on February 24, 2025, at 12:20 PM, revealed that contractures (permanent shortening and tightening of muscle fibers that reduces flexibility and makes movement difficult) were present in both of his hands. Resident 63 was observed wearing a splinting device on his right hand. During an immediate interview with Resident 63, he confirmed he had contractures and utilized splinting devices to prevent further functional loss. Review of Resident 63's physician orders revealed an order to cleanse both hands and check placement of cushion pad/brace that is worn at all times for contractures each shift, effective June 1,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for four of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 15, 17, and 93). Findings Include: Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) refer to basic self-care tasks that people typically perform daily. A review of the facility's policy, titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), revised March 2018, read, in part, Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene [bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care]. A review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and quadriplegia (a condition characterized by the complete or partial loss of motor and sensory function in all four limbs [arms and legs]). An observation of Resident 3, on February 24, 2025, at 1:10 PM, revealed facial hair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services as ordered by the physician for two of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 6 and 99). Findings Include: Review of the clinical record for Resident 6 revealed diagnoses that included lymphedema (swelling in the legs caused by lymphatic system blockage) and peripheral vascular disease (circulatory condition which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs). During an interview with Resident 6 on February 24, 2024, at 11:14 AM, the Resident was asked about his lymphedema pumps (pumps that use compressed air to apply pressure to the affected limb to force excess fluid out of the limb) that were lying in his room. Resident 6 stated that the pumps are to be applied twice a day but they are never done twice a day and sometimes goes a week without it being done. Review of Resident 6's physician orders dated February 2025, stated, lymphedema pumps to bilateral lower extremities: cover legs with pillowcases before putting boots on. To…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis services received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for two of two residents reviewed for dialysis (Residents 80 and 99). Findings include: A review of facility policy, End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with, revised September 2010, revealed, Agreements between this facility and the contracted ESRD [End Stage Renal Disease] facility include all aspects of how the resident's care will be managed and may include: how information will be exchanged between the facilities. A review of Resident 80's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and chronic end-stage or end-stage kidney (a severe and irreversible condition where the kidneys lose their ability to function). A review of Resident 80's physician orders revealed an order for dialysis treatments every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. A review of Resident 80's dialysis communication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 15 and 93). Review of the facility assessment and documentation determined that the facility failed to meet the staffing needs of their residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility's document, titled Facility Assessment, approved August 9, 2024, revealed its purpose is to determine what resources are necessary to care for our residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies. The document continued, This assessment addresses . The care required by the resident population using evidence-based, data driven methods that consider the types of diseases, conditions, physical and behavioral health needs, cognitive disabilities, overall acuity, and other pertinent facts that are present within that population, consistend with and informed by individual resident assessments. Also, The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) credential review, it was determined that in addition to the role of the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON was also the ICP and worked on the unit caring for residents as the nursing supervisor. Findings include: Review of facilty staffing information revealed that the DON was serving as the ICP. Observation during the full health survey revealed four residents that required personal protective equipment (PPE) and signage for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) due to wounds, dialysis, colostomy and catheter, no PPE or signage was present at the time of screening process. Additionally, two staff were observed entering a Resident's room who had signage designating contact precautions, and no PPE was worn while direct care was being provided. During an interview with the DON on February 25, 2025, at 1:00 PM, the DON confirmed that she should be functioning as the DON on a full-time basis. The DON has been doing the role of DON, ICP, and, on multiple occasions, covering as house supervisor with direct…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff implemented infection control policies and practices to prevent the spread of infection by using PPE (personal protective equipment) for four of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 32, 63, 96, and 99). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Isolation- Multi Route Transmission-Based Precautions, last revised October 2018, revealed that staff and visitors will wear clean, disposable gloves and a disposable gown when entering the room of a resident on contact precautions. Review of Resident 96's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included clostridium difficile (bacterium that causes an infection of the colon) and chronic kidney disease (condition where the kidneys stop filtering waste from the blood). Observation on February 24, 2025, at 10:29 AM, revealed Employee 3 (Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN]) and Employee 2 entering Resident 96's room to help…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for three of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 41, and 99). Findings include: Review of the clinical record for Resident 6 revealed diagnoses that included lymphedema (swelling in the legs caused by lymphatic system blockage) and peripheral vascular disease (circulatory condition which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs). Review of Resident 6's physician orders revealed an order for Oxycodone 10 mg (opioid medication) twice a day for severe pain that was initiated July 14, 2023. Review of Resident 6's December 6, 2024, quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental or psychosocial needs) revealed that the assessment was not coded to indicate that he received an opiod medication. During an interview with the Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident within 48 hours of the resident's admission for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 99). Findings include: Review of Resident 99's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (condition where one's kidneys are functioning below 10 percent of their normal function) and dependence on renal dialysis (treatment that removes extra fluid and waste products from the blood when the kidneys are not able to function properly). Further review of Resident 99's clinical record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was discharged home on October 3, 2024, then was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 99's order summary revealed an order for dialysis services three times per week, effective September 26, 2024. A second order for dialysis services three times per week was written upon his second…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, staff interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a pressure ulcer received care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of three Residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 8). Findings include: A review of the facility wound care policy, titled Dry/Clean Dressings, last reviewed July 2024, read, in part, 17. Apply the ordered dressing and secure with tape or bordered dressing per order. Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included unstageable pressure ulcer of left buttock (type of sore that occurs due to prolonged pressure on a specific area) and chronic kidney disease, stage 3 (moderate level of kidney damage where the kidney are not filtering waste effectively). Review of Resident 8's physician orders included an order to cleanse the left buttock wound with normal sterile saline and apply a hydrocolloid dressing (moisture retentive dressing) three times a week (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) on day shift and PRN (as needed).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for one of three residents reviewed for mobility (Resident 63). Findings Include: Review of Resident 63's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included quadriplegia (partial or total loss of use of all four limbs) and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 63's physician orders revealed an order to cleanse both hands and check placement of cushion pad/brace that is worn at all times for contractures each shift, effective June 1, 2023. Observation of Resident 63 on February 24, 2025, at 12:20 PM, revealed that contractures (permanent shortening and tightening of muscle fibers that reduces flexibility and makes movement difficult) were present in both of his hands. Resident 63 was observed wearing a splinting device on his right hand. During an immediate interview with Resident 63, he confirmed he had contractures and utilized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains free of accident hazards and that each resident receives adequate supervision and assessment for two of three residents reviewed for use of enabler bars (Residents 3 and 39). Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, titled Use of Bed Rails, revised September 2022, read, in part, Facility staff, in conjunction with the Attending Physician, will assess and document the resident's risk for injury due to neurological disorders or other medical conditions. Also, The resident will be checked periodically for safety relative to bed rail use. According to the policy, examples of bed rails included, Grab bars and assist bars. A review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and quadriplegia (a condition characterized by the complete or partial loss of motor and sensory function in all four limbs [arms and legs]). A review of Resident 3's interdisciplinary plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review observations, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory services for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 90). Findings include: Review of facility provided policy, titled Oxygen Administration, last revised October 2010, revealed in a step called Preparation, 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for the procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Review of Resident 90's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included obstructive sleep apnea (a sleep disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of complete or partial blockage of the upper airway during sleep, leading to reduced or absent breathing) and diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood [high blood glucose]). Observation of Resident 90 on February 24, 2025, at 11:57 AM, revealed the Resident sitting in their bed. On the side of the bed was an oxygen concentrator and the oxygen concentrator, providing the Resident supplemental oxygen at 2 liters…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to act upon the licensed pharmacist's report of a medication irregularity for two of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 8 and 41). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, last reviewed July 2024, read, in part, Antipsychotic medication will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review .18. The physician shall respond appropriately by changing or stopping problematic doses or medications, or clearly documenting (based on assessing the situation) why the benefits of the medication outweigh the risks or suspected or confirmed adverse consequences. Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (decline in cognitive abilities that interferes with daily life) and anxiety disorder (excessive and persistent worry, fear, and nervousness that significantly interferes with daily life).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility policy review, product packaging review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store medication in accordance with manufacture guidelines for one of three medication carts reviewed (D-2 medication cart). Findings Include: Review of facility provided policy, titled Medication Storage in the Facility, most recently reviewed July 2024, revealed, Medications requiring 'refrigeration' or 'temperatures between 2ºC (36ºF) and 8ºC (46ºF)' are kept in a refrigerator with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring. Medications requiring storage 'in a cool place' are refrigerated unless otherwise directed on the label. And, Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal and reordered from the pharmacy, if a current order exists. Observation of the C-2 medication cart on February 26, 2025, at 10:17 AM, revealed two Tresiba (insulin) pen unopened and not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to provided nursing and related services to assure resident safety and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident as determined by individual plans of care for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, titled Care Plans-Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised September 2022, read, in part, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Review of the facility's policy, titled Resident Rights, revised October 2022, read, in part, Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, dignity and respect. The policy continued, residents have the right to have the facility respond to his or her grievances. Review of Resident 4's interdisciplinary plan of care revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy and document review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to ensure that each resident is offered the COVID-19 vaccine, when available, and if the vaccination requires multiple doses, the resident and/or representative has the opportunity to accept or refuse the COVID-19 vaccine for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, titled Coronavirus (COVID-19) and COVID-19 Vaccine Policy, revised on February 18, 2022, read, in part, The vaccine will be offered and administered to residents per the most current Manufacturers', CDC [Centers for Disease Control], Federal, State, and/or local guidance. The policy continued, If a vaccine requires multiple doses, or an additional 3rd dose or more, or booster, educational information and consents will be completed for each dose administered. And Documentation of vaccination for residents: Acceptance or refusal of the vaccine. A review of electronic mail correspondence from the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to get a resident out of bed when requested for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings included: A review of the clinical record for Resident 2 revealed diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (a form of diabetes that is characterized by high blood sugar, insulin resistance, and relative lack of insulin) and congestive obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - disease process that causes decreased ability of the lungs to perform). A review of the care plan for Resident 2 dated July 2024, revealed that Resident 2 requires 2-person assist and his walker for transfers. Resident 2's care plan also had an intervention to keep Resident 2's routine consistent to decrease confusion due to Resident's fluctuating BIMs score (brief interview of mental status). A review of the nursing note for Resident 2 dated July 13, 2024, at 1:37 PM, stated, resident was unable to get out of bed before breakfast and was offered breakfast in bed but refused. Resident 2's wife (also his roommate) called a family member to complain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of staffing schedules, facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to assure residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one of four residents reviewed (Residents 2). Findings include: A review of the clinical record for Resident 2 on July 30, 2024, revealed a nursing note that there was only one Nurse Aide (NA) working on Resident 2's unit, and when Resident 2 rang the call bell to get out of bed for breakfast, the Resident was offered to eat breakfast in bed because there was not a second NA working to assist in getting the Resident out of bed. Resident 2 requires 2-person assist with his walker for transfers. The spouse of Resident 2 had to call a family member in to the facility to dress and assist the Resident out of bed for the lunch meal. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on August 1, 2024, at 9:00 AM, the NHA confirmed the accuracy of the low staffing levels. 28 Pa Code 211.12 (d)(4) Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for three of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 53, 107, and 358). Finding include: Review of Resident 53's clinical record on March 12, 2024, at 11:47 AM, revealed diagnoses that included vascular dementia (decline in thinking skills caused by conditions that block or reduce blood flow to various regions of the brain) and heart failure (condition where the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs). Review of Resident 53's physician orders revealed Resident 53 was admitted to hospice services on February 27, 2023. Review of Resident 53's minimum data set (MDS - assessment tool utilized to identify a residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial needs), section O0110 special treatments, procedures, and programs, subsection K1 hospice, revealed the facility failed to indicate that Resident 53 was receiving hospice services while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to attain or maintain the highest practicable level of physical and mental well-being for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 49). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, last revised September 2022, read, in part, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the residents physical, psychosocial, and functional needs, is developed and implemented for each resident. The services provided or arranged by the facility, as per the comprehensive care plan, must be culturally-competent and trauma-informed .Trauma-informed Care is an approach to delivering care that involves understanding, recognizing, and responding to the effects of all types of trauma. A trauma-informed approach to care delivery recognizes the widespread…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0685 — pattern
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident received proper treatment to maintain vision for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 90). Findings include: Review of Resident 90's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive (syndrome of weight loss, decreased appetite, depressive symptoms, and impaired immune function), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) following stroke effecting left dominant side, diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine), chronic kidney disease (CKD - the kidneys don't function as they should), and depressed mood. During an interview with Resident 90 on March 11, 2024, at 11:31 AM, it was revealed that he hasn't seen an eye doctor to get shots in his right eye for at least two months and that, according to the facility, this was due to the eye doctor not accepting his insurance.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the monthly pharmacy medication regimen review recommendations were acted upon in a timely manner for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 37 and 49). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Monitoring and Management, not dated, read, in part The consultant pharmacist reviews written record to determine that: 'Stop order' policies, where utilized, are observed .'Standing orders,' where utilized, are implemented appropriately. Review of Resident 37's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included pain in left knee, hypertension (high blood pressure), and osteoarthritis (a type of arthritis that affects the joints in your body). Review of Resident 37's monthly pharmacy medication regimen review recommendations revealed a recommendation from July 9, 2023, that stated Please add 'Do not exceed 3 grams in 24 hours from all sources' to the PRN [PRN- as needed] Acetaminophen order(s). Thank you. Review of Resident 37's monthly pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were contained in a permanently affixed locked compartment for two of two medication rooms observed (A1/B1 hall and C2/D2 hall); failed to ensure adherence to medication expiration dates for one of two medication storage rooms observed (A1/B1 hall); and failed to ensure appropriate labeling of medication when opened for one of two medication storage rooms observed (A1/B1 hall). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Storage in the Facility, last reviewed August 24, 2023, stated, Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Further review of the policy revealed a section titled Procedures subsection I stated, Controlled medications are stored separately from other medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility documentation, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate portion sizes for residents prescribed double portions for three of five residents observed (Residents 5, 7, and 32); and failed to provide therapeutic diet restrictions (a meal plan that controls the intake of certain foods or nutrients) for five of five residents observed on the carbohydrate controlled diet restriction (Residents 28, 58, 70, 83, and 409) during one of one tray line meal service observed. Findings include: Review of Document titled Carbohydrate Controlled Diet not dated, read, in part, Food Group: Desserts .Foods Allowed: Half portion of regular desserts. Review of the meal extension sheets revealed that residents on the carbohydrate controlled diet restriction should be served half of a 2 x 3 inch square of the chocolate chip brownie bar. Observation of lunch meal tray line service on March 13, 2024, between 11:10 AM and 12:07 PM, revealed Residents 28, 58, 70, 83, and 409's, tray tickets had notation that they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and beverages in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and four of four nourishment areas. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Policy: Storage Areas, not dated, read, in part, Food should be dated as it is placed on the shelves. Date marking to indicate the date or day by which are ready to eat .Leftover food is stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely. Each item is clearly labeled and dated before being refrigerated. Leftover food is used within 3 days or discarded .All foods should be covered, labeled, and dated. All foods will be checked to assure that foods (including leftovers) will be consumed by their safe use by dates, or frozen (where applicable) or discarded. Review of facility policy, titled Policy: Food from outside Sources, last revised July 2023, revealed, Visitors/family members will label food and beverages with the resident's name, room number, and date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of nurse aide in-service records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all nurse aide staff received a minimum of 12 hours of in-service education training each year for five of five direct care staff members reviewed (Employees 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12). Findings include: Review of the facility's yearly mandatory in-service training failed to reveal documented evidence that Employees 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 (Nurse Aides) met the yearly regulatory minimum training requirements. The following were documented hours of training for each employee: Employee 8 had 7 hours; Employee 9 had 6 hours; Employee 10 had 7 hours; Employee 11 had 7 hours; and Employee 12 had 7 hours. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on March 14, 2024, at 10:55 AM, it was revealed that the facility scheduled in-person training lasting one hour in duration each month and covered a different topic. It was further revealed that all staff are expected to attend one of the two training sessions offered each month; no make-up sessions were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observations, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 49). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Equipment Management, last revised February 27, 2019, read, in part, All equipment must be wiped down between patient use with a disinfectant cleaning solution/wipe that is rated: bactericidal, fungicidal, virucidal, tuberculocidal or as per manufacturer instructions .CPAP Machine filters: Non disposable filters should be washed monthly. Disposable filters should be changed out monthly .Humidifier chambers: Recommend to use distilled water only. Water should be changed daily. Review of Resident 49's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Obstructive Sleep Apnea (a common disorder that causes repeated breathing interruptions during sleep), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a mental and behavioral disorder that develops from experiencing a traumatic event, such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on completion of a test tray and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide foods that were at an appetizing temperature for one of one meals tested. Findings include: An interview with Resident 408 on March 11, 2024, at 11:17 AM, revealed his food is not always served hot during meals. During the resident group interview completed on March 12, 2024, at 10:00 AM, multiple residents voiced concerns with the temperature of the food served during meal service. During an interview with Employee 3 on March 13, 2024, at 12:20 PM, he revealed that he conducts test trays monthly, and hot foods should be served at or above 135 degrees and chilled foods should be served at or below 40 degrees. A test tray was completed on March 13, 2024, at 12:26 PM, utilizing a lunch tray served from tray line in the main kitchen. A test tray was served and placed in a closed food cart for approximately two minutes prior to being delivered to the C1 unit (other trays for room service were being delivered here also at this time). The test tray included: a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide education regarding the benefits and risks of the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines for three of five residents reviewed for vaccination status (Residents 61, 90, and 92). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Influenza Vaccine, last reviewed August, 2023, revealed the policy statement included, The facility shall provide pertinent information about the significant risks and benefits of vaccines to staff and residents (or residents' legal representatives); for example, risk factors that have been identified for specific age groups or individuals with risk factors such as allergies or pregnancy. Review of subsection 4 of the policy revealed it stated, Prior to the vaccination, the resident (or residents' legal representative) or employee will be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza vaccine. (See current vaccine information statements at [Centers for Disease Control's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0942 — isolated
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that direct care nursing staff completed training/demonstrated competency upon hire and annually thereafter related to resident rights for two of five direct care staff members reviewed (Employees 8 and 9). Findings include: Review of the annual Staff Education Reports for five direct care staff members revealed that Employees 8 and 9 (Nurse Aides) failed to complete annual training for resident rights in the past year. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on March 14, 2024, at 10:55 AM it was revealed that the facility scheduled in-person training lasting one hour in duration each month and covered a different topic. It was further revealed that all staff were expected to attend one of the two training sessions offered each month. The NHA acknowledged that at times a staff member doesn't attend the required monthly training, and the facility doesn't provide make-up sessions. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(1) Management. 28 Pa. Code 201.20(a)(d)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation as well as resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident the right to a clean and comfortable homelike environment for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 3 and 4). Findings Include: An observation of Resident 3, on March 4, 2024, at 10:15 AM revealed him to be sitting in his wheelchair resting. A closer observation of Resident 3's wheelchair revealed multiple areas of dried liquid on the seat, as well as debris resembling crumbs and other materials located on the seat, arm rests and back of the wheelchair. An immediate interview with Resident 3 revealed he did not know how the stains or debris were deposited on his wheelchair but assumed them to be remnants of his meals. An observation of Resident 4, on March 4, 2024, at 10:18 AM revealed him to be resting in a geri-chair (a larger and padded, reclining chair to help seniors with limited mobility). A closer observation of the geri-chair revealed a significant amount of crumbs on the seat and stains on the linen placed under Resident 4. An interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and complications related to the use of a catheter (thin tube that can be inserted through the urethra and into the bladder, allowing urine to drain) by catheterizing more times than required and improper placement of a foley catheter, for one of three residents reviewed for use of a catheter (Resident 1). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Catheterization, Intermittent, Female Resident, revised October 2010, revealed, Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included obstructive and reflux uropathy (disorder where urine cannot flow through the urinary tract due to an obstruction) and retention of urine (condition where one is unable to empty urine from the bladder, which can cause urine to back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to meet resident needs on two of four nursing units (A1 and C2/D2). Findings include: Review of Resident 16's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) and muscle weakness. Resident 16 resides on the A1 nursing unit. Review of Resident 16's care plan indicated she is at risk for falls and that staff are to provide a prompt response to all requests for assistance. Review of Resident 16's nursing progress notes dated September 16, 2023, revealed, Writer was notified by resident daughter via verbal that her mom was on the floor, writer walker [walked] to resident room, and found resident was on floor with supine position at 2045. Resident stated that she was sitting on her recliner, and she wanted to see something on her rollator walker pouch during that time she lost her balance . Review of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-01-14 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift, including an accurate resident census, on January 11 and 12, 2026. Findings include:During entrance to the facility on January 11, 2026, at 9:26 AM, the posted staffing was reviewed and observed to be dated January 9, 2025. Employee 2 (Director of Rehabilitation) came over and removed the two sheets of January 9 and 10, 2026, that were overtop of the staffing data sheet from January 11, 2026.Further observation of the posted staffing information for January 11, 2026, revealed a census number of 120 residents. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on January 11, 2026, at 10:13 AM, she revealed the facility census was 114 residents. Observation on January 12, 2026, at 1:28 PM, the posted staffing was reviewed and observed to be dated January 11, 2026; there was no sheet available for January 12, 2026.During an interview with the NHA on January 13, 2026, at 1:27 PM, she revealed she would expect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SPACEBAR OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/01/2021
AI ELEMENTS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST33%since 11/01/2021
STRAWBERRY HILL HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST33%since 02/25/2022
TILDE PROPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST33%since 01/01/2023
CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/05/2025
PRIORITY CARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2021
SUMMATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/11/2025
HAWKINS, STACEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/16/2022
PEARLSTEIN, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
267 FREDERICKS PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.4M
Related-party expense27% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 80%Medicare 4%Other / private 16%

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$306per resident / day
operating cost
$9,293per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$311per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395016. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next