Amoroso Healthcare And Rehabilitation Woodridge

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 84.1 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy review, clinical record review, review of facility investigation documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions, supervision, and effective safety measures to prevent elopement of a resident identified as being at risk for elopement (Resident 1). Resident 1 exited the building through an unlocked door and was found in the facility's parking lot. This failure placed eight additional residents in an Immediate Jeopardy situation who were identified as an elopement risk (Residents 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Wandering and Elopements, revised March 2019, revealed, The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. If identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other safety issues, the resident's care plan will include strategies and interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner that enhances his or her quality of life for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Dignity, dated 2001, read, Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times. Also, Resident goals, choices, preferences, values, and beliefs, are respected and honored.This begins at initial admission and continues throughout the resident's stay. Review of Resident 2's physician orders revealed diagnoses that included spinal stenosis (a condition characterized by the narrowing of spaces within the spine, putting pressure on the spinal cord and nerves) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed an admission date to the facility on February 25, 2026. Review of a documented statement, dictated to the Director of Nursing, dated February 26, 2026, revealed that upon admission to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, document review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the services provided met professional standards of quality for two of four resident records reviewed (Residents 1 and 4).Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Administering Medications, revised April 2019, read, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, as prescribed. The policy continued, The individual administering medications verifies the resident's identity before giving the resident his/her medications. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive, incurable, but treatable inflammatory lung disease causing obstructed airflow) and hypotension (abnormally low blood pressure). Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a critical condition where the lungs cannot adequately oxygenate the blood or remove carbon dioxide) and atrial fibrillation (a common heart condition characterized by an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of clinical records and a staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive plan of care for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings Include: Review of Resident 2's physician orders revealed diagnoses that included spinal stenosis (a condition characterized by the narrowing of spaces within the spine, putting pressure on the spinal cord and nerves) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed a recent hospitalization resulting in surgery to the spine. According to documentation, Resident 2's wound/incision required staples, and the care to the site should be open to air. Review of a document titled Employee Progress Discipline Notification, dated February 26, 2026, revealed that the Nurse Aide (Employee 3) assigned to provide care to Resident 2 was suspended for three days for double briefing Resident 2 with the knowledge that the surgical site needed to be open to air.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine drugs to its residents and provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for one of the four residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, titled' Policy Services Overview, revised April 2019, reads, in part, The facility shall accurately and safely provide or obtain pharmaceutical services, including the provision of routine and emergency medications and biologicals, and the services of a licensed consultant pharmacist. The policy continued, Pharmacy services are available to residents 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Also, Residents have sufficient supply of their prescribed medications and receive medications (routine, emergency, or as needed) in a timely manner. Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident condition for six of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 4, 5, 7, 15, and 32).Findings include: Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4 (injury to the skin and underlying tissue caused by prolonged pressure on the skin), hypertension (persistent high blood pressure), and schizophrenia (a chronic mental health condition characterized by disruptions in thought, perception, and behavior). Review of Resident 2's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set- assessment tool utilized to identify residents' physical, mental and psychosocial needs) with ARD (assessment reference date- last day of the assessment period) of May 18, 2025, revealed under Section M- Skin Conditions, Resident 2 was marked no to indicate he was not at risk of a pressure ulcer. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on October 21, 2025, at 1:09 PM, she revealed the aforementioned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent accidents for two out of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 4 and 83).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Falls - Clinical Protocol, with a last revised date of March 2018, and a last reviewed date of May 21, 2025, revealed, The staff and physician will identify pertinent interventions to try to prevent subsequent falls and to address the risks of clinically significant consequences of falling. The staff and physician will monitor and document the individual ' s response to interventions intended to reduce falling or the consequences of falling. Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease stage 4 severe (longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), vascular dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes, which causes memory loss in older adults), and adult failure to thrive (a past history of weight loss of more than five percent,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 4 and 85). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Weighing and Measuring a Resident last reviewed May 21, 2025, read, in part, The purposes of this procedure are to determine the resident's weight and height, to provide a baseline and an ongoing record of the resident's body weight as an indicator of the nutritional status and medical condition of the resident. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease stage 4 severe (longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), vascular dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes which causes memory loss in older adults), and adult failure to thrive (a past history of weight loss of more than five percent, decreased…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and utilize equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and three of three pantry areas.Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Policy: Storage Areas last reviewed May 21, 2025, read, in part, All foods should be covered, labeled, and dated. All foods will be checked to assure that foods will be consumed by their safe use by dates or discarded. All freezer units are always kept clean and in good working condition. Review of facility policy, titled Food from Outside Sources last reviewed May 21, 2025, read, in part, Visitors/family member will label food and beverages with the resident's name, room number, and date. Perishable foods with a 'use by' date which is 3 days from the date that it was brought into the facility.Observation of the dry storage area on September 29, 2025, at 9:27 AM, revealed one bag of spiral pasta open without an open date, and one bag of elbow pasta open without an open…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 9).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Psychotropic Medication Use, with a last review date of May 21, 2025, revealed, in part, Assessment and Evaluation of the Resident: 1. When determining whether to initiate, modify, or discontinue medication therapy, the interdisciplinary team conducts and documents an evaluation of the resident. 2. Circumstances that warrant an evaluation of the resident's underlying medical condition and medications include: a. admission or readmission; c. an irregularity identified during the drug regimen review. Behavioral and Other Non-Pharmacological Interventions: 1. Behavioral and other non-pharmacological approaches are used (unless contraindicated) to minimize or eradicate the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy reviews, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received a transfer notice with required included information upon transfer/discharge; failed to provide residents with a copy of the facility's bed hold policy for three of four residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents 8, 12, and 85).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Bed-Holds and Returns last reviewed May 21, 2025, read, in part, 1. All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents, regardless of payer source, are provided written notice about these policies at least twice: a. notice 1: well in advance of any transfer (e.g., in the admission packet); and b. notice 2: at the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours). Review of facility policy, titled Transfer or Discharge, last reviewed May 21,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$42,016 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $42,016 — penalty dated 2024-12-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA