Hollidaysburg Veterans Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 257 beds and averages 187.3 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 70 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.28 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.33 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.47 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 3) resulting in a fall with fracture. This deficiency is being cited as past non-compliance.Findings include: A facility policy regarding resident falls dated January 1, 2026, that all unwitnessed falls or a known strike to the head or neck required the neurological evaluation process. A significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment (mandated to assess the resident abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated May 1, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was occasionally incontinent of urine, and required substantial assistance with toileting hygiene. The resident's care plan, updated April 20, 2026, revealed that the resident had potential for falls and required his urinal to be kept at the bedside. A nursing note following a fall, dated April 14, 2026, indicated that Resident 3 stated he was trying to use his urinal but could not get his fancy pants off, referring to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies, investigative reports, and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect caused by a failure to follow a resident's care plan for assisting with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) and preventing falls for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 3), resulting in a fall and fracture for the resident. This deficiency was cited as Past Non-Compliance.Findings include: The facility's policy regarding resident abuse, dated January 5, 2026, revealed that the facility will provide protections for health, safety, welfare, and rights of each resident residing in the nursing home by prohibiting and preventing abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and any physical or chemical restraints not required to treat a resident's medical condition. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated January 6, 2026,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies, clinical records, and facility reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that protective devices to prevent injuries from falls were applied as care planned and ordered for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident R2) who fell and suffered a fracture and failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained free of accident hazards for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 3), who fell and suffered a fracture. Findings include:The facility's policy regarding incidents and accidents, dated January 5, 2026, revealed that the facility's purpose was to maintain the residents' safety and prevention of serious injury to the extent possible and to ensure a consistent and effective approach to the management and review of the fall itself. If the resident was determined to be high risk for falls, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) would initiate, individualized preventative measures on an individual basis which may include, but not limited to hip savers (a padded under garment to protect the hip area).A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at safe and appetizing temperatures. Findings include:The facility's policy regarding food temperatures, dated January 1, 2026, indicated that all hot foods were to be cooked to appropriate internal temperatures, held, and served at a temperature of at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F).Interview with a group of residents on June 10, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. revealed that the hot food is served warm or cold and that asking staff to reheat it in the microwave takes too much time. They stated that the residents that eat in their rooms are served first causing the food that sits in the dining room to cool down before the residents in the dining room are served. Interview with Resident 31 on June 8, 2026 at 12:14 p.m. revealed that the food is cold, the soup is always served cold, and that the plates are even cold. Interview with Resident 48 on June 8, 2026 at 12:19 p.m. revealed that the food is cold. She said that the food is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions.Findings include:The facility's policy for food storage, dated January 1, 2026, revealed that all prepared items would be covered, labeled and dated clearly. Observations in the main kitchen on June 8, 2026, at 9:13 a.m. revealed that a stand up fan had a build up of black dust and debris on the cage and was blowing towards the food prep area; and at 9:33 a.m. in the walk-in freezer located in the basement, there were 11 birthday gobs that were not dated. Interviews with the Dietary Manager on June 8, 2026, at 9:13 a.m. and 9:33 a.m. confirmed that the dirty fan should not have been blowing towards the food prep area and needed cleaned, and the gobs should have been dated. 28 Pa. Code 211.6(f) Dietary Services.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 5) who had a feeding tube.Findings include: A facility policy for feeding tubes, dated January 1, 2026, indicated that feeding tube use occurs based on current clinical standards of practice with the intent to maintain the resident's nutrition and hydration status within acceptable parameter and decrease the risk of complications from use. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated May 20, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care tasks, and had a feeding tube. Physician's orders for Resident 5, dated March 27, 2026, included orders for the resident to receive Novasource (a tube feeding formula) at 250 milliliters/hour as needed if the resident ate less than 50% for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Review of Resident 5's meal intakes for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to administer a resident's continuous oxygen as ordered for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 174).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding oxygen therapy, dated January 1, 2026, indicated that supplemental oxygen therapy is provided and monitored for residents as per the provider's order, or in emergency situations, for the ease and comfort of respiratory effort and disease symptom management.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 174 dated June 4, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required supervision with daily care needs, received oxygen therapy, and had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a disease that causes airflow blockage and breathing-related problems).Physician's orders for Resident 174, dated May 28, 2026, included an order for the resident to receive continuous oxygen at a flow…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of the facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label medications with the appropriate instructions for administration for two of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 66, 83). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration and labeling, dated January 1, 2026, indicated that it is the purpose to provide guidance regarding medication administration to be in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by people legally authorized to do so. Labels for individual drug containers must include directions for use. Only the container in which a prescription drug or device is sold or dispensed to the ultimate consumer shall bear a label which shall be written in ink, typed or computer generated and shall contain full directions for the use of its contents. Manufacturer's directions for the use of Jardiance (used to manage diabetes) dated April 2026, revealed that Jardiance should not be split, broken or crushed, this may affect the medications absorption and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 90).Findings include: CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's - bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics, and these antibiotics can no longer be used to control or kill the bacteria), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician was notified timely about a change in condition for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2). The facility's policy regarding changes in condition, dated January 1, 2026, indicated that when there was a change in the resident's condition, staff would notify the covering Registered Nurse who would then update the supervisor, physician, and family.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated April 29, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive, incurable lung disease that restricts airflow, making it difficult to breath, and used a CPAP (a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) machine to provide pressured oxygen through a mask to keep his airway open.A progress note for Resident 2, dated May 18, 2026, at 1:19 a.m. indicated that the CPAP machine was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide scheduled toileting following a fall for one of six residents reviewed (Residents 3).Findings include:The facility policy for urinary catheter care, dated January 8, 2026, indicated that changing indwelling catheters or drainage bags at routine, fixed intervals, was not recommended. Rather it was suggested to change catheters and drainage bags based on clinical indications such as infection, obstruction, or when the closed system was compromised.An email was sent on March 11, 2026 for nursing supervisors to discuss incontinent care with no double briefing- toileting and changing residents every two hours documentation needs to be in point of care (POC) with all care, staff cannot block chart at the beginning of their shift and then the resident falls and it appears via documentation that the resident hasn't been changed all shift. The blue tile for incontinent care in POC changes to white after the first entry, but they can continue to add in rounds…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies, clinical records, and facility reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation to rule out abuse or neglect as the cause of a fracture for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding falls, dated January 5, 2026, revealed that upon observation of a resident on the floor/lower level or witnessing a fall, if able, staff were stay with the resident and call for assistance. The Registered Nurse Supervisor was to be notified immediately. Staff were to document complete fall information, to include how the resident was found, environment around the resident, possible reason for fall, any applicable immediate interventions placed, any alteration in skin integrity, changes in prior known condition, and above notifications in the resident's electronic health record.The facility's policy regarding resident abuse/neglect, dated January 5, 2026, revealed that the facility would conduct a thorough investigation to determine facts specific to the case…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow facility policy for the care and monitoring of residents receiving dialysis for one of 59 residents reviewed (Resident 140). Findings include: Review of the facility's current dialysis policy, dated July 1, 2024, revealed that when the resident returns from dialysis the resident will be assessed by a registered nurse with a complete set of vital signs and the dialysis access permacath (a catheter used for dialysis access) or fistula (a surgically created access point for dialysis) would be assessed for bleeding every 15 minutes for two hours. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 140, dated April 25, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, had a diagnosis of kidney failure, and received dialysis. The current care plan revealed that Resident 140 goes to dialysis early in the morning on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in PA