Lutheran Home At Hollidaysburg
916 Hickory Street, Hollidaysburg, PA 16648 · Non profit - Church related · 89 certified beds · (814) 696-4527 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $101,905 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-25)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.9% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.5% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 7.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.1% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.5% | 0.2% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.2% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.9% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.8% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.4% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.8% | 68.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.4% | 22.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 0.0% | 9.5% | 12.0% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.12 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 41.2 residents a day — about 46% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, investigative reports, and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect caused by the failure to transfer a resident properly, resulting in a fractured arm for one of three residents (Resident 2) reviewed. This deficiency was cited as past noncompliance. Findings include: The facility's policy on freedom from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation and other suspicious crimes or events, dated January 11, 2024, indicated that each resident had the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse; corporal punishment; misappropriation of property; and involuntary seclusion. Every resident in the facility was to be treated with consideration, respect, and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality, and management and staff were jointly and individually responsible to ensure each resident was free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 3), resulting in the resident suffering mental anguish. Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated January 11, 2023, indicated that each resident had the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse; corporate punishment; misappropriation of property; and involuntary seclusion. Every resident in the facility was to be treated with consideration, respect, and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality, and management and staff were jointly and individually responsible to ensure each resident was free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated September 13, 2023, indicated that the resident was alert and oriented, and required the extensive assistance of staff for daily care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). This deficiency is being cited as past non-compliance.Findings include: A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment (mandated to assess the resident abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated May 5, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was understood and understood others. A nursing note for Resident 1 dated June 14, 2026, at 11:40 a.m. revealed that the resident was seen propelling herself in her wheelchair down the hallway and that she had white chalky substance on her lips. A medicine cup of what was believed to be Calmoseptine paste was found on her bedside table with a spoon. An investigation into the resident found with white chalky substance for Resident 1, dated June 14, 2026, revealed that the resident was found with white chalky substance on her lips and it was believed to be Calmoseptine paste (an over-the-counter multi-purpose moisture barrier and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's baseline care plan included information regarding the resident's immediate care needs for one of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 32).Findings include:An admission note for Resident 32 dated October 14, 2025, at 6:31 p.m. revealed that the resident arrived at the facility at 5:25 p.m., was alert and oriented and had a midline surgical incision (vertical cut made down the center of the abdomen) that was closed with a VAC dressing (Vacuum-Assisted Closure dressing- a medical device that uses a vacuum pump to apply suction to a wound, promoting healing). Physician's orders for Resident 32 dated October 14, 2025, included for the resident to have his wound VAC settings and all connections checked every four hours, be administered two 500 milligram (mg) capsules of Amoxicillin (an antibiotic medication) twice a day, and be administered 500 mg of Clarithromycin (an antibiotic medication) twice a day for surgical aftercare following surgery on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to bowel protocols for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 22).Findings include:A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 22 dated July 13, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, had clear speech, was usually understood, could rarely understand, required assistance with daily care needs, was always incontinent of bowel, and had diagnoses that included dementia. Current physician's orders for Resident 22, included an order for the resident to receive 5 ounces (oz) of Fiberjuice (laxative- used to produce a bowel movement) as needed for constipation if no bowel movement by the second day. Resident 22's bowel movement records dated September and October, 2025 indicated that the resident did not have a bowel movement on September 4, 2025, through September 7, 2025. There was no documented evidence that 5 ounces (oz) of Fiberjuice was offered to or refused by the resident after the second day of no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care for pressure ulcers in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that recommendations from a wound consultant were reviewed with the attending physician for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 13) who had pressure ulcers.Findings include:An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 13, dated September 29, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and had a pressure ulcers (skin breakdown caused by pressure). A wound clinic note, dated September 25, 2025, revealed that Resident 13 had a Stage IV pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle.) to the left lateral maleolus (outer ankle), the bone was palpable, and a treatment of collagen powder (a type of medical dressing used to promote wound healing using purified collagen, a protein that is essential for skin and tissue repair) mixed with bacitracin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of nurses aides dates of hire and their most recent performance review dates, it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual nurse aide performance evaluations for two of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aides 1 and 2).Findings include:A list of nurse aides provided by the facility revealed that Nurse Aide 1 was hired on May 23, 2000. Based on her date of hire, an annual performance evaluation was due in May, 2025. However, there was no documented evidence that the annual performance evaluation was completed as required.Nurse Aide 2 was hired on June 21, 2022. Based on her date of hire, an annual performance evaluation was due in June, 2025. However, there was no documented evidence that the annual performance evaluation was completed as required.Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on October 22, 2025 at 2:26 p.m. confirmed that Nurse Aides 1 and 2 did not have an annual performance evaluations. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician, resulting in a significant medication error for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 34).Findings include:A facility policy for medication and treatment administration dated September 5, 2025, indicated that medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame.A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 34 dated October 8, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs and had diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (a heart rhythm disorder characterized by a rapid and irregular heartbeat) and aneurysm of an artery in the lower extremity (an enlargement or weakened area in a blood vessel in the leg). Hospital discharge records for Resident 34 dated September 4, 2025, included physician's orders to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.Findings include:The facility's dietary policy regarding food storage, dated September 5, 2025, revealed that to prevent cross contamination, food should be properly stored. Raw meat, raw eggs, and poultry should be separate from ready to eat and prepared foods. Observations in the kitchen on October 20, 2025, at 9:12 a.m. revealed that in the walk in cooler there was a roll of frozen raw ground [NAME] thawing on a tray. Below the tray of raw [NAME] was a container labeled cooked ground beef for chili.Interview with Dietary Aide 3 on October 20, 2025, at 9:26 a.m., revealed that he should have moved the raw thawing [NAME] to the bottom shelf below the cooked prepared [NAME].Interview with the Dietary Director on October 20, 2025, at 9:25 a.m. confirmed that the cooked [NAME] should not have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0941 — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of job descriptions, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Communication training to three of five direct care facility staff reviewed.Findings include:Review of the facility Nursing Assistant Job Description indicated the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort. Complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Review of the Licensed Practical Nurse Job Description indicated that the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort, and to complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Interview with the Human Resources Director on October 22, 2025 at 1:48 p.m. revealed that staff are required to complete their annual training each year.Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0942 — isolatedEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of job description, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Resident Rights training to two of five direct care facility staff reviewed.Findings include:Review of the facility Nursing Assistant Job Description indicated the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort. Complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Review of the Licensed Practical Nurse Job Description indicated that the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort, and to complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Interview with the Human Resources Director on October 22, 2025 at 1:48 p.m. revealed that staff are required to complete their annual training each year.Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of job description, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide abuse, neglect, and exploitation training to two of five direct care facility staff reviewed.Findings include:Review of the facility Nursing Assistant Job Description indicated the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort. Complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Review of the Licensed Practical Nurse Job Description indicated that the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort, and to complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Interview with the Human Resources Director on October 22, 2025 at 1:48 p.m. revealed that staff are required to complete their annual training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0944 — isolatedConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of job description, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training to three of five direct care facility staff reviewed.Findings include:Review of the facility Nursing Assistant Job Description indicated the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort. Complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Review of the Licensed Practical Nurse Job Description indicated that the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort, and to complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Interview with the Human Resources Director on October 22, 2025 at 1:48 p.m. revealed that staff are required to complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolatedInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of job description, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Infection Control training to two of five direct care facility staff reviewed.Findings include:Review of the facility Nursing Assistant Job Description indicated the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort. Complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Review of the Licensed Practical Nurse Job Description indicated that the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort, and to complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Interview with the Human Resources Director on October 22, 2025 at 1:48 p.m. revealed that staff are required to complete their annual training each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0946 — isolatedProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of job description, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide compliance and ethics training to two of five direct care facility staff reviewed.Findings include:Review of the facility Nursing Assistant Job Description indicated the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort. Complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Review of the Licensed Practical Nurse Job Description indicated that the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort, and to complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Interview with the Human Resources Director on October 22, 2025 at 1:48 p.m. revealed that staff are required to complete their annual training each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of job description, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct the minimum 12 hours of nurse aide (NA) training per year for one of five direct care facility staff reviewed.Findings include:Review of the facility Nursing Assistant Job Description indicated the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort. Complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Review of the Licensed Practical Nurse Job Description indicated that the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort, and to complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Interview with the Human Resources Director on October 22, 2025 at 1:48 p.m. revealed that staff are required to complete their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolatedProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of job description, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Behavioral Health training to three of five direct care facility staff reviewed.Findings include:Review of the facility Nursing Assistant Job Description indicated the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort. Complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Review of the Licensed Practical Nurse Job Description indicated that the primary purpose of your job role is to provide a safe environment, give emotional and social support and attend to the residents physical needs and comfort, and to complete or attend all training and education as assigned and as otherwise required by applicable law, rule, or regulations.Interview with the Human Resources Director on October 22, 2025 at 1:48 p.m. revealed that staff are required to complete their annual training each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide clearly documented reasons for facility-initiated transfers to the hospital to the resident and resident's representative in language and manner that could be easily understood for five of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 8, 18, 35, 42, 47). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 8, dated August 4, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was independent with personal hygiene care needs, and had diagnosis that included dementia. A nurse's note for Resident 8, dated January 17, 2024, revealed that the resident had a fall in her bathroom and complained of right hip pain. The physician was notified, and the resident was transferred to the emergency room for evaluation. There was no documented evidence that a written notice of Resident 8's transfer to the hospital was provided to the resident or her responsible party regarding the reason for the transfer. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise care plans for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 15, 29). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated January 11, 2024, indicated that the care plan is to ensure care and treatment is planned and individualized to the person's served problems/needs, conditions, impairment, disability, and or disease. If a significant change occurs, the care plan is to be reviewed for accuracy and completeness and revised if necessary. If any team member identifies an interim change that does not meet the definition of a significant change, the care plan may be adjusted accordingly. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 15, dated July 10, 2024, indicated that the resident was understood and able to understand others, was dependent on staff for personal hygiene care, and had diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and failed to ensure that the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for three of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 29, 40). Findings include: A facility policy for elopement, dated January 11, 2024, indicated that an elopement is defined as when a resident leaves the facility, or enters an unsafe area, without any team member being aware that the resident has done so. An analysis of each elopement is to be completed by the health care center management team, identifying all possible reasons why safety and security measures were breached. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 40, dated August 9, 2024, indicated that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, had a history of wandering, was independent with personal hygiene needs and ambulation, and had diagnoses that included dementia. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of polices and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 42, 45). Findings include: A facility policy for medication administration, dated January 11, 2024, indicated that medications were to be poured, administered, and documented by the licensed team member with accountability for the specific medication cart. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 42, dated August 28, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had diagnoses that included diabetes, and received insulin. Physician's orders for Resident 42, dated August 22, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive Humalog insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar) subcutaneously (beneath the skin) with meals based on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plan of corrections for an annual survey ending October 12, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending September 13, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to a failure to develop and implement comprehensive care plans, failure to revise care plans, failure to protect residents from accidents/hazards, failure to store medications securely,; and failure to ensure that resident's medical records were complete and accurate. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative had an opportunity to develop an advance directive (instructions regarding the provision of health care when the resident is incapacitated) or assist in formulating an advance directive for three of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 22, 27, 35). Findings include: The facility policy regarding advance directives and life sustaining treatment preferences, dated January 11, 2024, indicated that upon admission, the persons served will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. If the persons served indicates that he or she has not established advance directives, the healthcare center staff will offer assistance in establishing advance directives. The persons served will be given the option to accept or decline the assistance, and care will not be contingent on either…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was developed to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 29). Findings: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated January 11, 2024, indicated that the care plan is to ensure care and treatment is planned and individualized to the person's served problems/needs, conditions, impairment, disability, and or disease. If a significant change occurs, the care plan is to be reviewed for accuracy and completeness and revised if necessary. If any team member identifies an interim change that does not meet the definition of a significant change, the care plan may be adjusted accordingly. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 29, dated June 14, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was sometimes understood and sometimes able to understand others, and required assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that ambulation programs to maintain or improve physical abilities were provided as ordered and/or care planned for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated June 11, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was usually understood and able to usually understand others, and required partial/moderate assistance to walk 10 feet, 50 feet and 150 feet. A care plan for Resident 2, initiated July 28, 2024, indicated that the resident had the potential for decline in abilities and was placed on an ambulation program. Staff was to offer assistance with the program as directed and was to incorporate programs into activities or tasks to improve participation (such as ambulate to/from bathroom and to/from dining room). The original initiation date for her restorative ambulation program was documented as August…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 45). Findings include: A review of the clinical record for Resident 45 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes. Physician's orders for Resident 45, dated September 8, 2024, included an order for the resident to have her blood sugar checked before meals and at bedtime and for staff to administer sliding scale (dose is based on a person's blood sugar) insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar). Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 8, dated September 2024, revealed no documented evidence that the resident's blood sugar was checked to determine if insulin was required on September 9 before breakfast, on September 10 before breakfast, and on September 10 before supper. Interview with the Director of Nursing on September 12,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that treatments for pressure ulcers were provided as ordered by the physician for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding treatment/medication administration, dated January 11, 2024, indicated that medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed and recorded on the resident's treatment administration record (TAR). A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated June 29, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was understood and able to understand others, required assistance with care needs, was dependent for transfers, had two unstageable pressure ulcers (full-thickness pressure injuries in which the base is obscured by slough and/or eschar), and had a diagnosis that included peripheral vascular disease (disease reducing blood flow to the legs). A care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that interventions were in place to prevent urinary tract infections for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 13) who had an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated August 8, 2024, revealed that the resident had diagnoses that included dementia and obstructive uropathy (when urine cannot drain through the urinary tract) and had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted and held in the bladder to drain urine). Physician's orders for Resident 13, dated August 6, 2024, included an order for the resident to have an indwelling urinary catheter due to having an obstruction and urinary retention. A care plan, dated August 6, 2024, indicated that the catheter tubing and collection bag were to be kept off the floor. Observations of Resident 13 on September 12, 2024, at 12:31 p.m. and 12:37 p.m. revealed that she was in her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that interventions to maintain nutrition were provided as recommended by the dietician for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 13). Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 13, dated August 8, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required supervision with eating, weighed 106 pounds, and had weight loss. Dietary notes for Resident 13, dated August 26, 2024, at 3:41 p.m., revealed that the resident had a significant weight loss and the dietitian recommended to the physician to add four ounces of magic cup (frozen nutritional supplement) daily with dinner and four ounces of enriched pudding (pudding with additional nutrients) daily with lunch. Observations of Resident 13 during the lunch meal on September 12, 2024, at 12:31 p.m. revealed that the resident was sitting in her room eating her meal, and she did not have enriched pudding. The resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0729 — isolatedVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility job descriptions and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff renewed the nurse aide registry to allow individuals to work as a nurse aide for one of six nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 3). This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's job description for Nurse Aide, undated, revealed that a nurse aide certification was necessary to perform functions of the position. The personnel file for Nurse Aide 3 revealed that her certification on the nurse aide registry expired on [DATE]. The facility was unaware that Nurse Aide 3's certification on the nurse aide registry was expired until it was discovered it on [DATE]. Nurse Aide 3 worked in the facility from [DATE] to [DATE]. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on [DATE], at 1:21 p.m. confirmed that Nurse Aide 3's certification on the nurse aide registry expired on [DATE], and should have been renewed prior to expiring and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: A facility policy for medication administration, dated January 11, 2024, indicated that medications were to be poured, administered, and documented by the licensed team member with accountability for the specific medication cart. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated August 9, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was understood and understands, had pain, and received an opioid (a controlled pain medication). Physician's orders for Resident 3, dated November 29, 2023, included and order for the resident to receive 5-325 milligrams (mg) of hydrocodone-acetaminophen three times a day for chronic arm pain. Review of the controlled drug record (a form that accounts for each tablet/pill/dose of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly secure and store medications in one of two medication rooms (front hall). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication storage, dated January 11, 2024, indicated that all drugs and biologicals were to be stored in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. The nursing staff was responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals were to be locked when not in use. Unlocked medication carts were not to be left unattended. Observations on September 9, 2024, at 10:25 a.m. revealed that the door to the medication room on the second floor (front hall) was left open and unattended. The medication cart was stored inside the medication room and was unlocked. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 4 on September 9, 2024, at 10:28 a.m. confirmed that she was down the hallway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that laboratory specimens were obtained as ordered by the physician for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated August 9, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired and was receiving an anticoagulant (blood thinner). A care plan, dated January 20, 2023, indicated that the resident had a history of deep vein thrombosis (blood clot that develops in a deep vein) and pulmonary embolism (blood clot that goes to lung), and Coumadin was to be administered as ordered and laboratory results were to be monitored per physician orders. Physician's orders for Resident 3, dated August 28, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 6.5 milligrams (mg) of Coumadin (a blood thinner) daily and to check the PT/INR (a test that indicates how much time it takes for the blood to clot) on September 4, 2024. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff used proper infection control techniques during incontinent care for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 30). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding hand washing, dated January 11, 2024, indicated that hand washing is the single most important means of preventing infection, and that hands are to be washed after the care of the resident, and after any contact which may contaminate you. Gloves are worn when there is contact with blood and body fluids, secretions, and excretions. Gloves are not a substitute for hand washing, and hands are to be washed even when gloves are worn. A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment (mandated to assess the resident abilities and care needs) for Resident 30, dated August 31, 2024, indicated that she was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, had an indwelling catheter (a thin, hollow tube that is inserted into the bladder to collect and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in residents' care needs for four of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 30, 31, 38). Findings include: A facility policy for care planning, dated January 11, 2023, indicated that if any interdisciplinary team member identified an interim change, the care plan would be adjusted accordingly. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated July 11, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance from staff for her daily care needs. The resident's care plan, most recently updated on July 11, 2023, revealed that the resident was at risk for falls due to her impaired cognition. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated May 1, 2022, included an order for the resident to receive two fall mats for safety. Observations of Resident 2 on October 10, 2023, at 10:35 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary medications for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 26). Findings include: The facility's policy for Psychotropic Medication Use, dated January 11, 2023, indicated that residents receiving psychotropic (cause changes in mood and behavior) drugs will be monitored for targeted behaviors and side effects. Behavioral approaches are to be utilized prior to giving as needed medications. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 26, dated August 15, 2023, revealed that the resident was understood and able to understand others, required extensive assistance with daily care needs, and had diagnosis that included Alzheimer's disease. Physician's orders for Resident 26, dated August 23, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 0.25 milligrams (mg) of alprazolam (a psychotropic medication to treat anxiety) every six hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, manufacturer's instructions and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label multi-dose containers of insulin with the date they were opened in one of two medication carts reviewed (1st Floor Back Medication Cart), failed to ensure that controlled refrigerated medications were stored in a separately locked, permanently affixed container in two of two medication refrigerators reviewed (second floor front and second floor back medication room refrigerators), and failed to label a bottle of testing solution when it was opened in one of two medication room refrigerators reviewed (second floor back medication refrigerator). Findings include: Manufacturer's directions for Insulin Lispro (Humalog - a fast-acting insulin used to lower blood sugar levels), dated November 2019, indicated that opened vials were to be thrown away after 28 days of use, even if there was insulin left in the vial. The facility's policy regarding medication labels, dated January 11, 2023, revealed that each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 29). Findings include: An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 29, dated July 18, 2023, revealed that the resident was understood and could understand, required extensive assistance for all care, and had a diagnosis of diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood). A care plan for the resident, dated August 14, 2023, indicated that the resident had diabetes and that staff were to administer medications as ordered by the physician. A care plan for the resident, dated September 9, 2023, indicated that the resident was to participate with the restorative nurse program (helps residents practice activities of daily living to improve, or at least maintain, overall functioning) for ambulating related to the inability to ambulate without assistance and risk of decline. The resident was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs of residents for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 26). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plan development, dated January 11, 2023, revealed that based on the Minimum Data Set assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs) and any other related information, an individualized, person-centered care plan would be developed to address problems/needs, goals, and approaches/interventions. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated July 12, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance from staff for daily care needs. Observations of Resident 1 on October 10, 2023, at 11:03 a.m. revealed that she had a machine that is able to remotely check her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, as well as and clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible, by not properly identifying residents with a high risk for elopement for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 33). Findings include: A facility policy for elopement, dated January 11, 2023, included that all residents at risk or those demonstrating attempts to leave the unit or building will have a photograph taken and available for all team members to view and use. The interdisciplinary team provides goals and approaches to address the elopement risk. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 33, dated September 14, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, exhibited wandering behaviors, required extensive assistance with daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease. A care plan for Resident 33, dated August 10, 2023, indicated that the resident was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$101,905 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $11,132 — penalty dated 2024-06-25
- $90,773 — penalty dated 2023-10-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| EVANS, CHAD | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 09/20/2006 |
| REIGHARD, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/24/1999 |
| SAVAGE, PATRICIA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/26/1996 |
| BOWERSOX, EDWARD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2016 |
| BRADLEY, THOMAS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/01/2008 |
| BRENNEMAN, HELEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/20/2006 |
| COBAUGH, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2010 |
| FREDERICK, CAROL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2016 |
| GLEN, SUZANNE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2016 |
| LLOYD, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/01/2011 |
| MEARKLE, AMY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/01/2012 |
| MILLER, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2016 |
| RHYNE, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2016 |
| SMITH, ELAINE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2016 |
| THOMPSON, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/20/2006 |
| WHIPKEY, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2012 |
| WILLIAMSON, SUSAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2013 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $582K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395427. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.