No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ellen Memorial Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente

23 Ellen Memorial Lane, Honesdale, PA 18431 · For profit - Corporation · 128 certified beds · (570) 253-5690 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744, F0758)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
600 Maple Avenue, Wayne Memorial Health Systems Complex, Suite 2
Pharmacy
1101 Main St · (570) 253-7700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
742 Main St · (570) 352-3645 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Golf Hill0.4 mi
(570) 253-5616 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
111 Old Salem Pike · (570) 253-5451

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.2%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.9%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.7%0.2%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.3%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.8%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine42.6%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.7%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.4%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine41.7%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.5%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.8%9.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.081.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.591.181.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 96 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.8%CMS range 32.0–48.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 9.5–17.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge37.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.6–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.25
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
55.4%
Total nursing turnover
46.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 115.7 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-10)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-15)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy, facility investigative documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from neglect by not providing care with the required assistance of two staff members and the use of a mechanical lift as planned to ensure safety and prevent major injuries. As a result, the resident sustained a fracture of the ankle with actual harm for one out of five residents reviewed (Resident CR1). This deficiency is cited as past noncompliance.Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled Abuse, adopted by the facility on December 1, 2025, revealed the residents at the facility have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. Neglect is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to timely notify the resident's responsible party of a change in condition for one resident out of 6 residents sampled (Resident 1). Findings include:A review of a facility policy for Change in condition last reviewed December 9, 2025, revealed, the purpose of the policy is to insure that the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's Physician and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representation when there is change requiring notification. Circumstances requiring notification to include, a transfer or discharge of the resident from the facility. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include cerebral vascular disease (conditions affecting blood flow and bleeding in the brain), anxiety and high blood pressure. A review of Resident 1's quarterly minimum data set (MDS, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, laboratory reports, intake documentation, facility records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure one resident (Resident 1) out of six residents reviewed, received timely assessment, monitoring, and intervention following a significant change in condition, including failure to ensure timely follow up of ordered diagnostic testing and failure to identify and address inadequate fluid intake. Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates that the registered nurse was to collect complete ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, laboratory reports, physician orders, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were provided in a timely manner and failed to ensure appropriate follow up of ordered laboratory testing for one resident (Resident 1) out of the six residents sampled (Resident 1). Findings included: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include cerebral vascular disease (conditions affecting blood flow and bleeding in the brain), anxiety and high blood pressure. A review of Resident 1's quarterly minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated September 16, 2025 revealed a BIMS score of 14 (BIMS, brief interview for mental status, a tool to assess the residents attention, orientation and ability to register and recall new information, a score of 14 to 15 equates to cognitively intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility policy. facility investigative reports, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident of unknown origin to rule out abuse, neglect or mistreatment as the potential cause, for one out of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the facility's Abuse Policy, last reviewed by the facility in January 2025, indicated that incidents of unknown origin will be investigated as abuse until root cause can be identified. Written procedures for investigation include: identifying staff responsible for the investigation; exercising caution in handling evidence that could be used in a criminal investigation; investigating different types of alleged violations; identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations; focusing the investigation on determining if abuse, neglect, exploitation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to fully develop and revise a person-centered comprehensive care plan to meet the individualized needs of one resident out of 20 sampled (Resident 67). Findings included: A review of Resident 67's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks) and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 67's POLST (Pennsylvania Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment, a process that helps an individual receive the medical treatment they want, and avoid the medical treatments they do not want, when they are seriously ill or frail) initiated by the facility's Social Worker (SW) and completed with Resident 67's RP (responsible party) dated [DATE], indicated the resident's code status was changed to do-not-resuscitate (DNR a medical order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement individualized approaches to prevent declines in bowel continency and restore normal bowel function to the extent possible for one resident (Resident 65) out of 20 residents sampled. Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Bladder and Continence, last reviewed on January 2, 2025, indicated residents who are identified as having the potential to improve continence, place on a retraining program. According to the policy, upon admission, re-admission, with any significant change, and after urinary catheter removal, a bowel and bladder diary will be completed for a minimum of three days to gather information about the resident's current continence status. Upon review of the data gathered from the diary, a continence evaluation will be completed, and an appropriate toileting program implemented. A review of Resident 65's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on February 23, 2024, with diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure coordination of care and services between the facility and the Hospice Agency for two residents (Residents 69 and 7). Findings include: A review of Resident 69's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning) and Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). A review of physician's order dated December 4, 2024, revealed the resident was admitted into hospice services for a diagnosis of end stage Alzheimer's disease. A review of the resident's care plan initially dated October 30, 2024, and last revised November 25, 2024, revealed the resident's care plan failed to reflect coordination of services between the facility and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy, clinical records and select investigative reports, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that three residents out of the five sampled for abuse (Residents 65, 73, and 89) were free from physical abuse. Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, last revised by the facility on January 16, 2024, revealed that it is the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. The policy defines physical abuse as including, but not limited to, hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of alcohol-induced persisting dementia (a condition characterized by the loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of clinical records and schedule of activities programming and resident activities participation records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the needs, interests, and functional abilities of residents, including three residents out of 21 sampled (Residents 77, 74, and 80). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks). A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated January 16, 2024, revealed that Resident 74 is severely cognitively impaired. Resident 74's care plan, included the problem of socially inappropriate behaviors that included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record and select policy review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately monitor a fluid restriction prescribed to address a resident's clinical condition and maintain fluid balance and adequate hydration status for two residents out of 21 sampled. (Resident 35 and 43) Findings include: A review of a facility policy entitled Fluid Restrictions that was last reviewed by the facility on January 16, 2024, indicated that the facility would ensure that fluid restrictions would follow in accordance with physician's orders. Nursing will obtain and verify physician's orders for the fluid restriction and an order written to include the breakdown of the amount of fluid per 24-hours to be distributed between the food and nutrition department and the nursing department and will be recorded on the medication record or other format as per facility policy. A review of Resident 35's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy and facility incident reports, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to maintain the highest practicable level of mental, physical and psychosocial well being of three residents with a diagnosis of dementia out of 21 sampled residents (Residents 74, 80, and 77 ). Findings include: A review of a facility policy entitled Behavioral Management that was last reviewed on January 16, 2024, indicated that residents exhibiting behaviors that could endanger themselves, other residents, or staff may benefit from a behavioral care plan to ensure that they receive appropriate services and interventions to meet their needs. A behavioral health care plan could include a schedule of daily life events that address the individuality of the resident and should reflect the resident's personal preferences, and usual routines, to the extent possible. The care plan should include the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and the facility's abuse prohibition policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their established procedures for thoroughly investigating an injury of known source, a fractured leg, sustained by one resident, to rule out abuse, neglect or mistreatment as the potential cause for out of 21 residents sampled (Resident 57). Findings include: A review of the facility's Abuse Policy, last reviewed by the facility on January 16, 2024, indicated that incidents of unknown origin will be investigated as abuse until root cause can be identified. Written procedures for investigation include: identifying staff responsible for the investigation; exercising caution in handling evidence that could be used in a criminal investigation; investigating different types of alleged violations; identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies and clinical records, staff and resident interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care to promote the highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being of one resident out of 21 sampled (Resident 5). Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Behavioral Management last reviewed January 16, 2024, indicated that residents who exhibit behaviors which could endanger themselves, other residents or staff may benefit from a behavioral care plan to ensure they are receiving appropriate services and interventions to meet their needs. Behaviors should be documented clearly and concisely by facility staff and documentation should be specific behaviors, time and frequency of behaviors, observations of what may be triggering behaviors, what interventions were utilized and the outcomes of the interventions. Behaviors should be identified and approaches for modification or redirection should be included I the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, a review of clinical records, select facility policy, current infection control guidance and the facility's resident testing logs for COVID-19 infection, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement and maintain infection control practices, including infection control precautions, to prevent spread of infection COVID-19. Findings include: According to information provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) dated September 23, 2022, and updated February 8, 2023, health care providers that test positive for COVID-19 and are asymptomatic throughout their infection and not moderately to severely immunocompromised could return to work after the following criteria have been met: at least 7 days have passed since the date of their first positive viral test if a negative viral test is obtained 48 hours prior to returning to work (or 10 days if testing is not performed or if a positive test at day 5-7). Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on October 5, 2023, at approximately 9 AM revealed that on September…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy and procedures and employee statements it was determined that facility staff failed to timely report alleged resident abuse of one out of 7 residents sampled (Resident 5). Findings include: The facility's Abuse Policy, dated as reviewed by the facility August 15, 2022, indicated that the facility will provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. An alleged violation is defined as a situation that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has not yet been investigated and, if verified, could be indication of noncompliance with the Federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property. Mistreatment is defined as inappropriate treatment or exploitation of a resident. Reporting of alleged violation to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Review of the current facility policy entitled Date Marking for Food Safety provided during the survey ending March 17, 2023, indicated that the facility adheres to a date marking system of ready-to-eat,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of select facility policy, and grievances lodged with the facility and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive grievance policy and ensure the necessary information for filing a grievance was posted and/or provided/available to residents or their representatives and failed to make residents aware of the procedure for filing a concern/grievance, written or verbally, and the procedure to file an anonymous grievance as reported by three of four residents (Residents 5, 52, and 73) during a group meeting. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy entitled Resident and Family Grievances (reviewed/revised November 1, 2022) indicated that it is the facility's policy all grievances and complaints filed will be investigated and corrective actions will be taken to resolve the grievance(s). Observations of the hallway next to the chapel, conducted on the days of survey from March 15, 2023, through March 17, 2023, revealed a posting regarding the facility's grievance policy, however the posted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and select facility procedures and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to accurately monitor bowel activity and carry out physician orders for a prescribed bowel protocol to promote normal bowel activity for one resident out of 22 sampled (Resident 31). Findings include: Review of the current facility Procedure on Bowel Protocol indicated that the facility will identify and provide interventions to residents who have not had a bowel movement in 72-hours. Nursing assistants are responsible to document each resident's bowel movements daily on every shift in Point Click Care (PCC). If a resident does not have a bowel movement on their shift, not applicable is to be documented in the PCC system in the section for bowel movements. If a resident has not had a bowel movement over a three-day period, Milk of Magnesia will be administered on the 3-11 shift as per the physician's orders and documented in PCC. If the resident has not had a bowel movement by the fourth day, a Dulcolax suppository will be administered on the 11 PM - 7 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the attending physician failed to timely act on a pharmacist's identification of an irregularity in the drug regimen of one resident out of five sampled (Resident 74). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia. A review of Resident 74's clinical record revealed the pharmacist conducted a drug regimen review on July 25, 2022, and identified irregularities in the resident's drug regimen and made recommendations to the attending physician. There was no documented evidence that the attending physician acted upon the reported drug irregularity. The consultant pharmacist identified the same drug irregularity on November 20, 2022, four months after the original recommendation, on July 25, 2022. However, there was no documented evidence that the attending physician had acted upon the pharmacy recommendation. Interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, select facility policy review and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate labeling to promote accurate drug administration to one resident (Resident 2) out three residents observed during medication administration and failed to adhere to use by/discard dates for multi-dose medications on one medication carts out of three medication carts reviewed. Findings include: According to the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, Uniform Prescription Labeling Requirements, indicate that critical information on prescription labels include the Use by date, which is the Date by which medication should be used, not expiration date of medication or expiration date of prescription. Observation of medication administration pass on [DATE], at 8:25 AM revealed that Employee 2 administered Oxycodone 10 mg by mouth to Resident 2. Observation of the medication label on the Oxycodone blister pack revealed that the label indicated to that the resident was to take one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, test tray results, and a review of minutes from the facility's food committee meeting and select facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food at safe and palatable temperatures. Findings include: Review of the current facility policy entitled Food Preparation Guidelines indicated that food and drinks shall be palatable, attractive, and at safe and appetizing temperatures. Strategies to ensure resident satisfaction include to serve hot foods/drinks hot and cold food/drinks cold. Interviews with Residents 5, 14, 52, and 73 during a group meeting conducted on March 16, 2023, at 11:15 AM, revealed that the residents expressed concerns that their meals were not consistently served at palatable temperatures. The residents relayed that hot food was not always served hot enough and cold food was not always served cold enough for their preferences. During an observation in the facility's kitchen of the lunch meal tray service on March 16, 2023, at 11:35 AM, revealed that the temperatures of the meal, obtained,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to fully develop and implement an antibiotic stewardship program. Findings include: A review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Policy (ASP) dated March 18, 2019, indicated that the Infection Prevention and Control Committee will support and promote antibiotic use protocols which include assessment of residents using standardized tools and criteria. The committee will review the ASP policy and antibiotic use protocols annually and make recommendations for changes to the program. The Infection preventionist will collect and analyze infection surveillance and treatment data to ensure that infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship activities are supported. The facility will monitor antibiotic use, stewardship actions, and outcomes related to antibiotic use (excluding topical or ophthalmic antibiotics) in order track compliance and impact of the ASP. The facility will track physician habits monthly to determine what antibiotics are frequently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of one resident out of 22 sampled (Resident 78). Findings include: A review of Resident 78's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed in Section J1800, Any Falls Since admission or Prior Assessment (OBRA or PPS), whichever is more recent, revealed that the resident had not falls since admission or the prior assessment. However, a review of Resident 78's clinical record revealed that the resident had a incurred a fall from her wheelchair on November 30, 2022. Interview with Employee 4, Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator on March 16, 2023, at approximately 1:30 PM confirmed that the residents MDS's was inaccurate with respect to the resident's fall. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(g)(h)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility incident reports, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan to address the current safety needs of one resident to prevent recurrence of falls for one resident (Resident 78) out of 22 residents reviewed. Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia, anxiety disorder, abnormalities of gait and mobility and muscle weakness. A facility incident report dated January 7, 2023, at 0630 (6:30 AM) revealed that staff found the resident lying on the floor of her room. Immediate interventions planned after this fall were to apply a chair and bed alarm. These interventions were both discontinued on March 3, 2023, because they increased the resident's agitation. Interview with Employee 3, Licensed Practical Nurse, on March 15, 2023, at 11 AM revealed that the resident's chair and bed alarms were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to administer pain medication as prescribed by the physician and attempt non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain prior to the administration of pain medication prescribed on an as needed basis for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 65). Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled Pain Management Policy last reviewed January 30, 2023, indicated that the facility will utilize a systemic approach for recognition, assessment, treatment and monitoring of pain. The management and treatment of pain will include non-pharmacological interventions which include but are not limited to environmental comfort (adjusting room temperature, comfortable seating or assistive devices, or smoothing linens), loosening any constrictive bandages or clothing, physical modalities (cold compress, warm shower/bath, massage, turning/repositioning), and cognitive/behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma informed care to address a resident with a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder for one out of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 76). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The resident's current care plan, in effect at the time of the survey ending March 17, 2023, did identify the resident PTSD diagnosis. However, the resident's care plan did not identify the resident's real and potential triggers related to this diagnosis and failed to include the specific interventions planned in response to provide individualized person-centered care to the resident. The facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to address, modify and manage this resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of nurse staffing, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide and/or efficiently deploy sufficient nursing staff to consistently provide timely and quality of care to residents as required, including timely provision of assistance with activities of daily living, to residents dependent on staff and to accommodate resident the preferences for daily routines to maintain a resident's psychosocial well-being for one resident (Resident 28) out of 22 sampled. Findings include: During observations performed of the blue unit on March 15, 2023, at 11:00 AM, Resident 28's call bell was observed to be activated. The resident was observed to be in bed at that time wearing pajamas. During an interview with Resident 29, who was cognitively intact, on March 15, 2023, at 11:03 AM, revealed that she had activated her call bell and was now waiting for two staff members to get her out of bed and provide her morning care so she could be dressed for the day and on time for lunch in the main dining room. Resident 28 stated that she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0729 — isolated
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on employee personnel records and Pennsylvania State nurse aide registry information and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure current nurse aide registry verification for two facility employees working as nurse aides in the facility (Employees 5 and 6). Findings include: A review of personnel records conducted during the survey ending [DATE], revealed that Employee 5's nurse aide certification expired [DATE] and Employee 6's nurse aide certification expired [DATE]. A review of facility staffing records revealed that Employee 5 worked at the facility on the following dates: [DATE], 22, and 24, 2022; [DATE], 8, 12, 16, 20, 22, 23, 25, 26, and 30, 2022; [DATE], 10, 12, 14, 21, 23, 25, 27, 28, and 30; [DATE], 6, 11, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 23, 24, 26, and 27, 2023; February 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 20, 21, 23, 25, 26, and 28, 2023; [DATE], 6, 9, 11, 12, 14, and 15, and 17, 2023. Employee 6 worked at the facility on the following dates: [DATE] and 11, 2022; [DATE], and 25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to attempt gradual dose reductions of psychoactive medications and failed to monitor the effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs as treatment for targeted behavioral symptoms and for potential adverse consequences for one resident (Resident 19) out of five residents sampled Findings included: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a type of brain disease that causes a long-term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember how to perform normal activities such as bathing, dressing and eating). The resident had a physician's order dated February 19, 2021, that was current at the time of the survey ending March 17, 2023, for Haloperidol (an antipsychotic medication used to treat certain mental/mood conditions) 2 mg by mouth twice daily for dementia with behavioral disturbance. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policy, directives established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and employee vaccine data, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to fully develop and implement procedures to ensure that all staff were vaccinated for COVID-19. The facility's staff vaccination rate was 99.2% at the time of the survey ending March 17, 2023. Findings include: A review of a DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Quality, Safety & Oversight Group dated October 28, 2022, QSO 23-02-ALL memo stated that within 60 days after the issuance of this memorandum the facility demonstrates that policies and procedures are developed and implemented for ensuring all facility staff, regardless of clinical responsibility or patient or resident contact are vaccinated for COVID-19; and 100% of staff have received the necessary doses to complete the vaccine series (i.e., one dose of a single-dose vaccine or all doses of a multiple-dose vaccine series), or have been granted a qualifying exemption, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-15.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 6%Other / private 27%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$343per resident / day
operating cost
$10,421per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$297per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395357. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next