No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Beacon Ridge

1515 Wayne Avenue, Indiana, PA 15701 · Non profit - Corporation · 118 certified beds · (724) 349-5300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (724) 349-5300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1265 Wayne Ave · (724) 463-0286 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
280 Indian Springs Rd · (724) 463-9300 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi1.7 mi
2910 Oakland Ave · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2125 Oakland Ave · (724) 465-2665 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
207 Old US Hwy 119 · (724) 349-1856

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.7%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.9%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.5%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.2%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.0%25.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.2%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.9%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.1%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.4%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.9%9.5%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.0%CMS range 33.4–54.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.6–18.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 3.9–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.661.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
1.04
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.11
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.61
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
51.3%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 78.6 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-23)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, and clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services for a Stage 3 pressure ulcer (pressure wound involving the fat layers beneath the skin) for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 43), resulting in a deterioration of the wound and delayed healing. Findings include: The facility's pressure ulcer policy, dated January 22, 2026, indicated that the facility will ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new sore from developing. Document in the resident's record and the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) that wound care was administered as prescribed. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 43, dated August 25, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing/grooming and hygiene, was incontinent of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at safe and appetizing temperatures.Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food preparation, dated January 22, 2026, indicated that all foods will be held at appropriate temperatures, greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit (or as state regulations requires) for hot holding, and less than 41 degrees Fahrenheit for cold food holding. A dietary tracking form of tray delivery times revealed that on April 20, 2026, breakfast trays were delivered to Bayside at 7:40 a.m. Observations on Bayside on April 20, 2026, at 8:09 a.m. revealed a breakfast cart containing nine undelivered breakfast trays. Two trays had protective lids only covering half of the dish and the eggs were exposed. At 8:18 a.m. the Regional Dietary Manager arrived on unit, and the trays were still on the cart. The Regional Dietary Manager took temperatures of the uncovered eggs which were 103 degrees Farenheit. Eggs with the protective coverings temped at 112.8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the kitchen.Findings include:The facility's policy for food temperatures, dated January 22, 2026, revealed the temperature of potentially hazardous cold foods must be served at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below.The facility policy regarding food storage, dated January 22, 2026, revealed that food should be stored in such a manner as to prevent contamination and to maintain the safety and wholesomeness of the food for human consumption.Observations on April 20, 2026, at 6:07 a.m. in the main kitchen walk in cooler revealed that the temperature inside the walk-in cooler was in the danger zone of 42 degrees Fahrenheit. Observations on April 20, 2026, at 6:07 a.m. in the main kitchen walk in cooler revealed that there were 56 cartoons of milk that expired on April 19, 2026, and were not discarded.Observations on April 20, 2026, at 6:10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing regarding the reason for transfer to the hospital for six of 40 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 8, 9, 43, 67, and 81).Findings include: A nursing note for Resident 7, dated February 11, 2026, revealed that at 12:00 p.m. the resident had an unwitnessed fall. Resident 7 was yelling for help which staff responded to and found her sitting on the floor near her dresser. Resident 7 did not appear to hit her head, but stated her right arm hurt. A new order was received to send to the emergency for evaluation and treatment. A nursing note for Resident 7, dated April 2, 2026, revealed that at 12:55 p.m. the x-ray results showed the right elbow and shoulder showed a subacute displaced fracture in the right humerus (upper arm bone). A new order was received to send to the emergency for evaluation and treatment. Review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed that there was no documented evidence that the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for six of 40 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 10, 12, 34, 43, 57).Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (required assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2025, revealed that Section N0415K1 Anticoagulant was to be checked if the resident took the medication during the seven-day look-back period. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated June 7, 2026, included an order for the resident to receive 500 milligrams (mg) of Divalproex Sodium (anticonvulsant) two times a day for seizure disorder. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 2, dated March 2026, revealed that staff administered the 500 mg of Divalproex two times a day from March 1 through March 31, 2026. However, a quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan for two of 40 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, and 43). Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated February 3, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff with daily care needs, received antipsychotic medications (medications used to treat mental health disorders), had a diagnosis of dementia, depression with severe psychosis and obsessive-compulsive disorder (a chronic mental health condition characterized by uncontrollable repeated thoughts and/or behaviors). A physician's order for Resident 1, dated January 16, 2026, included orders for the resident to receive o.25 milligrams (mg) of risperidone twice daily related to severe depression with psychotic features. There was no documented evidence that a care plan was developed to address Resident 1's use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician, resulting in a significant medication error for two of 40 residents reviewed (Residents 44 and 73).Findings include:A facility policy for medication and treatment administration dated January 22, 2026, indicated that medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders.A admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 44 dated January 12, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs and had diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (a heart rhythm disorder characterized by a rapid and irregular heartbeat).A nursing note dated January 6, 2026, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility as a hospice respite stay.Hospice medication orders for Resident 44 dated November 12, 2025, included physician's orders to administer 5mg of Jantoven (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of hospice contracts and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to coordinate care with the hospice provider by failing to follow recommendations for changes in medications for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 38). Findings include: The Hospice contact, effective June 3, 2022, indicated that hospice and the facility shall communicate with one another regularly and as needed for each particular hospice patient. Each party is responsible for documenting such communications in its respective clinical records to ensure that the needs of the hospice patients are met 24 hours per day. If there are physician orders that are inconsistent with the hospice plan of care or hospice protocols, a nurse with facility shall notify hospice. An authorized representative of hospice shall resolve differences directly with the physician and secure the necessary orders. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 38, dated March 20, 2026, revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call bells were within reach for two of 40 residents reviewed (Residents 32 and 78).Findings include:A review of the facility policy for resident call system dated January 22, 2026, indicated that each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his/her bed, from toileting/bathing facilities and from the floor. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 32 dated February 6, 2026, indicated that the resident was sometimes understood and sometimes able to understand others, required assistance from staff for daily care needs and had diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (brain condition that causes problems with movement, mental health, sleep, pain and other health issues) and dementia. Care plan for Resident 32 dated March 20, 2019, indicated that the resident had a self-care performance deficit and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for two of 40 residents reviewed (Residents 8 and 43).Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 8, dated March 8, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs and had diagnoses that included paralytic syndrome following cerebral infarction (persistent, bilateral muscle weakness or paralysis affecting both sides of the body as a long-term consequence of a stroke). Care plan for Resident 8 dated March 18, 2026, indicated that the Resident was receiving diuretic (medicines that help reduce fluid buildup in the body) therapy for edema (swelling caused by excess fluid trapped in the body's tissues) and staff were to administer diuretic medication as ordered by the physician. Review of the Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify a provider's order for two of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 9, 34).Findings include:The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 9, dated February 12, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs and had diagnoses that included dementia.Physician's progress note for Resident 9 dated April 7, 2026, included that the resident was to have routine Tylenol for pain control. Physician's orders for Resident 9 dated November 12, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with proper colostomy care for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 16).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding colostomy care (care for an artificial opening in the bowel), dated January 22, 2026, colostomy care will be provided per physician orders to provide the stoma with good skin care and check the condition of the stoma and surrounding skin.An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 16 dated March 17, 2025,indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had medical diagnosis that included intellectual disabilities and had an ostomy (a surgically created opening in the abdomen for bowel elimination. A review of Resident 16's clinical record revealed that there was no physician order for the resident colostomy size or orders to change the colostomy appliance. Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who were receiving enteral feedings (delivers liquid nutrients directly into the stomach) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 43). Findings include: A facility policy for feeding tubes, dated January 22, 2026, indicated that the licensed practical nurse will change feeding tube dressings at least every 24 hours unless the physician's orders say otherwise and they are to document the dressing change in the resident's chart. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 43, dated February 20, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, had limited range of motion to her upper and lower extremity on one side, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had an indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment in the refrigerator for the storage of controlled drugs (medications with the potential to be abused) in one of two medication rooms reviewed. Findings include:Observations in the facility's medication room on the Landings unit on April 22, 2026, at 1:11 p.m. revealed one small, locked refrigerator containing five bottles of liquid Ativan (a controlled medication used to treat anxiety). The liquid Ativan was not in a secured, locked compartment separate from other non-narcotic medications. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 1 at the time of the observation confirmed that the five bottles of liquid Ativan were not in a secured, locked compartment separate from other non-narcotic medications. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on April 22, 2026, at 1:40 p.m. confirmed the five bottles of liquid Ativan were not in a secured, locked compartment separate from other non-narcotic medications. 28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that laboratory services were obtained as ordered by the physician for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 57).Findings include:Facility policy for Laboratory Services dated January 22, 2026, indicated that the facility will provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of the residents, and will promote practices to ensure the quality and timeliness of laboratory services. The day shift unit nurse will fill out and send laboratory requests for newly ordered laboratory tests. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 57, dated March 29, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, was independent with daily care needs, and had a history of urinary tract infection. Nurse's note for Resident 57 dated February 24, 2026, at 1:31 p.m. revealed that the resident complained of burning and pain on urination, that the physician was notified, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment in residents' rooms for five of 38 residents reviewed (Resident 1, 13, 25, 29, 75). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding homelike environment, dated January 2, 2025, indicated that the facility staff and management were to the extent possible maximize the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized homelike setting including a clean, sanitary, and orderly environment. Observations of Resident 1's room on May 22, 2025, at 9:10 a.m. revealed that there was a large area of dried chipping paint, approximately 24 inches by 10 inches above the heating/cooling unit. Interview with the Maintenance Director on May 22, 2025, at 9:40 a.m. revealed that he was not aware of the chipping paint and indicated that with all the rain lately that moisture must be coming in the walls. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated/revised to reflect a resident's specific care needs for three of 38 residents reviewed (Residents 35, 47, 50). Findings include: A facility policy regarding comprehensive person-centered care plans, dated January 2, 2025, indicated that comprehensive, person-centered care plans are developed within seven days of the completion of the required comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs). Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the resident's conditions change. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 35, dated February 26, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with care needs, and had a diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure). A care plan for Resident 35, dated September 16, 2024, indicated that the resident was receiving a diuretic (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper care for indwelling urinary catheters (a flexible catheter used to drain urine from the bladder into a drainage collection bag) for three of 38 residents reviewed who had an indwelling urinary catheter (Residents 4, 7, 10). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding urinary catheter care, dated January 2, 2025, indicated that staff are to be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated May 7, 2025, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required assistance with daily care, had an indwelling urinary catheter, and had a diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (nerve damage to the bladder). A care plan for Resident 4, dated March 19, 2023, revealed that the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was created to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of 38 residents reviewed (Resident 7). Finding include: A facility policy, dated January 2, 2025, revealed that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. It will aid in preventing or reducing decline in the resident's functional status and/or functional levels and assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the resident's conditions change. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 7, dated, May 5, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with daily care needs, and had a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Clinical record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to safely transfer one of 38 residents reviewed (Resident 62) who required assistance from staff for transfers. Findings include: An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 62, dated March 4, 2025, indicated that he was alert and oriented, required moderate assistance for daily care needs, and assist of one for transfers with wheeled walker and gait belt. Observations of Resident 62 on May 22, 2025, at 8:24 a.m. revealed that Nurse Aide 2 transferred the resident from a seated position to his wheelchair by using the back of his pants while there was a gait belt on the back of his wheelchair. Interview with Nurse Aide 2 on May 22, 2025, at 8:26 a.m. revealed that she was aware of Resident 62's transfer status and that she did not use a gait belt for the transfer instead she used the back of his pants for the transfer. Interview with Nursing Home Administrator on May 22, 2025, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 38 residents reviewed (Resident 35). Findings include: A facility policy regarding medication administration, dated January 2, 2025, indicated that the individual administering the medication initials the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 35, dated February 26, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with care needs, and was taking an opioid medication (medications with the potential to be abused used to treat pain). Physician's orders for Resident 35, dated January 30, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 5-325 milligrams (mg) of Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (a narcotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, manufacturer's instructions, and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent. Findings include: A facility policy regarding medication administration, dated January 2, 2025, indicated that medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. The individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. Each nurses' station has a current Physician's Desk Reference (PDR) and/or other medication reference available. Observations during medication administration on May 21, 2025, revealed that three medication administration errors were made during 29 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication administration error rate of 10.34 percent. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending June 6, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending May 22, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies regarding safety and accident hazards, failure to provide proper catheter care, and failure to ensure the accountability of controlled substances. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding safety and accident hazards, cited during the survey ending June 6, 2024, revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to store food under sanitary conditions, failing to ensure that a microwave used to reheat resident food was clean (Bayside Nourishment Center), and failing to ensure that ice was made and stored in sanitary ice machines for one of two ice machines (Bayside Nourishment Center). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food and supply storage, dated January 16, 2024, revealed that most, but not all, products contain an expiration date. The words sell-by, best-by, enjoy-by, or use-by should precede the date. The sell-by date is the last date that food can be sold or consumed; do not sell products in retail areas or place them on patient trays/resident plates past the date on the product. Foods past the use-by, sell-by, best-by, or enjoy by date should be discarded. Cover, label, and date unused portions and open packages. Products are good through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nutritional supplements as ordered by the physician for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 1), failed to ensure that the hypoglycemic protocol was followed for two of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 38), failed to ensure physician's orders for medications were followed for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 48); and failed to ensure that physician's orders for bowel protocols/medications were followed for two of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 74). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated February 27, 2024 revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and had the potential for decreased nutritional intake. Physician's orders, dated April 30, 2024, included orders for the resident to receive a four ounce Mighty Shake (nutritional supplement) with each meal. The resident's care plan, dated May 14, 2024, indicated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate accounting of controlled medications (medications with the potential to be abused) for two of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 58). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding controlled substances, dated January 16, 2024, indicated that each controlled substance prescription is documented in the resident's medical record with the date, time and signature of the person administering the prescription. The prescription is recorded in the patient's health record and recorded on the Medication Administration Record (MARs). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 7, dated April 15, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, had pain occasionally, received pain medication routinely and as needed, received an opioid (a controlled pain medication). Physician's orders for Resident 7, dated January 9, 2023, included an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that non-pharmacological (non-medication) interventions were attempted prior to the administration of anti-anxiety medications for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 58). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 58, dated March 22, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and had diagnoses that included anxiety. A care plan for the resident, dated November 9, 2021, revealed that the resident was at risk for mood decline/anxiety. If the resident had any signs/symptoms of anxiety, staff was to attempt to identify the source and eliminate it if possible. Staff will allow the resident to express feelings/concerns. Staff will offer emotional support and empathetic listening as needed. De-escalation preferences included music, books, TV, and friends. If the resident was restless, staff will check on the resident's needs (pain, hunger, thirst, toilet,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly date medications after they were opened in two of three medication rooms reviewed (Landings and Bayside), and failed to discard expired medical supplies. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication storage and disposal, dated [DATE], revealed that the facility would properly date medication vials after they were opened and remove outdated supplies from the facility inventory. Observations in the Landing medication room refrigerator on [DATE], at 12:12 p.m. revealed that there was one 30 ml (milliliter) bottle of Ativan opened and undated. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 6 on [DATE], at 12:18 p.m. confirmed that the Ativan was open and should have been labeled with the date it was opened. Observations in the Bayside medication room refrigerator on [DATE], at 12:24 p.m. revealed that there was one opened and undated multi-dose vial of insulin Glargine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of correction for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending July 27, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems with audits to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the audits were to be reported to the QAPI committee for review. The results of the current survey, ending June 6, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies regarding professional standards being met, quality of care, that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards, urinary catheter care, issues with oxygen therapy, preventing issues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the dignity of one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 75) who had an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 75, dated May 2, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required partial to maximum assist with personal hygiene care, and had diagnoses that included stroke. A care plan for Resident 75, dated May 31, 2024, revealed that the resident had a Foley catheter (partially flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and leads to a drainage bag) and that care included keeping her urine drainage bag covered in order to promote dignity. Physician's orders for Resident 75, dated May 30, 2024, included an order for the resident to have a Foley catheter. Observations of Resident 75 on June 5, 2024, at 8:54 a.m. revealed the resident lying in bed with her Foley catheter drainage bag attached to the side of her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, facility policies, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify questionable physician's orders for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated May 7, 2024, indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, had pressure ulcers, and diagnoses that included a stroke. A care plan, dated April 30, 2024, revealed that Resident 5 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow recommendations from a wound consultation for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated May 7, 2024, indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, pressure ulcers, and diagnoses that included a stroke. A care plan, dated April 30, 2024, revealed that the resident was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, and treatments were to be administered as ordered. A wound note, dated May 24, 2024, revealed the resident had a Stage III pressure ulcer on the right gluteus (buttocks) that measured 5.0 x 5.0 x 0.1 centimeters (cm) with recommendations to apply Santyl (removes dead tissue) to the area twice a day. However, the resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR), dated May 2024, revealed that there was no documented evidence that Santyl was applied to the resident's right gluteus twice a day as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an environment that was free of accident hazards by failing to follow physician's orders and care-planned interventions for diets for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 29), failed to ensure that care-planned interventions were in place at the time of a fall for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 26), failed to follow physician's orders and care-planned interventions to prevent skin breakdown for one of 33 resident's reviewed (Resident 42), and failed to ensure that safe wheelchair transport techniques were used for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 79). Findings Include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 26, dated May 9, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for personal care needs, had diagnosis that included Alzheimer's disease, and had a history of falls. A care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that interventions were in place to prevent urinary tract infections for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 5) who had an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding urinary catheter care, dated January 16, 2024, indicated that the catheter tubing and drainage bag were to be kept off the floor. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated May 7, 2024, revealed that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, had an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted and held in the bladder to drain urine), and had diagnoses that included neurogenic bladder (bladder dysfunction caused by nervous system conditions). Physician's orders, dated April 29, 2024, included an order for the resident to have an indwelling urinary catheter. Observations of Resident 5 on June 5, 2024, at 9:13 a.m. revealed that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that oxygen tubing and a nasal canula remained off the floor for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 42). The facility's policy regarding oxygen therapy, dated January 16, 2024, indicated that oxygen was to be administered safely and in accordance with physician's orders. A quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 42, dated March 5, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and had diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a serious condition that causes low blood oxygen) and a history of generalized anxiety. A care plan, dated August 29, 2023, indicated that Resident 42 was to receive continuous oxygen while sleeping due to a respiratory disease. Physician's orders for Resident 42, dated April 11, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive continuous oxygen at a flow rate of 2 liters per minute via nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for an invasive procedure to collect a specimen for a laboratory test for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 58). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding intermittent catheterization (the insertion and removal of a catheter several times a day to empty the bladder), dated January 16, 2024, indicated that staff was to verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 58, dated December 25, 2024, revealed that the resident was usually understood and could usually understand others. A care plan for the resident, dated September 23, 2021, indicated that the resident had a potential for discomfort due to urinary retention (when the bladder does not empty completely or at all). Staff was to perform intermittent catheterization as ordered by the physician and as needed. Physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided the proper food consistency as ordered by the physician for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 29). This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 29, dated February 20, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, and had a diagnosis which included Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA - commonly known as a stroke) with hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body). A care plan for the resident, dated September 7, 2022, revealed that the resident had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to a left hemiplegia, and that the resident was able to feed herself after set up. A care plan, dated September 8, 2018, revealed that the resident had a potential nutritional problem related to CVA and dysphagia (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control practices were followed during wound care for two of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 45, 59). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding hand hygiene, dated January 16, 2024, indicated that hand hygiene is an important infection control measure to prevent illness in skilled nursing homes, and that hands should be sanitized or washed before and after the use of gloves. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 59, dated April 21, 2024, revealed that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, had diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition that reduces blood flow to the limbs). Physician's orders, dated May 24, 2024, included an order to cleanse the left foot with normal saline solution, pat dry, apply betadine, a heel cushion and soft rolled gauze wrap. Observations on June 4,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
PENNSYLVANIA MOUNTAINS CARE NETWORKOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/06/2024
MCANDREWS, LEAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/06/2024
AHMED, JAMILIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/18/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-19.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 4%Other / private 30%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$332per resident / day
operating cost
$10,098per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$277per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395702. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next