Neffsville Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 201.8 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards and failed to provide adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, the facility utilized radiant space heaters in resident rooms and in a hallway of the rehabilitation unit following loss of heat, placing residents, including residents with cognitive impairment, at risk for serious injury or death. This failure constituted Immediate Jeopardy for the 22 residents on the Rehab unit.Findings include:During an interview conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on February 3, 2026, at approximately 8:20 a.m., the NHA reported one hallway in the rehabilitation unit lost heat on the evening of January 31, 2026. In response, the facility placed three radiant space heaters in resident rooms and two radiant space heaters in the rehabilitation unit hallway.Observations conducted February 3, 2026, at 8:24 a.m., during the survey revealed radiant space heaters actively in use in resident rooms and in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy and procedure review, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review it was determine the facility failed to ensure that one of three residents reviewed was free from free from accidents and provided adequate supervision resulting in actual harm of a distal femur fracture of Resident 1. Findings include: Review of Resident 1's diagnosis list revealed a diagnosis of Obesity, history of falling, hip fracture, Muscle Weakness, CVA (Cerebral Vascular Accident- Stroke) and Dementia (group of conditions that cause a decline in cognitive function, including memory, thinking, reasoning, and problem-solving, severe enough to interfere with daily life). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of resident needs) dated May 5, 2025, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident 1's Care Plan revealed a care plan for ADL (Activities of Daily Living- basic self-care tasks that individuals perform on a regular basis to maintain their health and independence) self-care performance deficit r/t…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-04 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of employee job descriptions, as well as observations, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility's administration, including the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing, failed to effectively utilize available resources to promote resident safety and maintain the highest practicable physical well-being of residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards by permitting the use of radiant space heaters in resident rooms and hallways, including areas accessible to residents with cognitive impairment. This failure placed residents at risk for serious injury or death and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation.Findings include: The job description for the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), dated October 06, 2025, indicated the NHA's primary purpose is to manage the facility in accordance with current applicable federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern long-term care facilities. To follow all facility policies and apply them uniformly to all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, and resdient interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in four of four resident bathrooms. (Apple, Rosemont, [NAME] and Rehab units)Findings Include:Observation of the Apple unit bathroom on October 17, 2025 at 11:15 a.m. revealed the floor of the shower was missing approximately 8 tiles and the corner of the wall separating the bathtub and the shower had broken and missing tiles.Observations of the Rosemont unit bathroom on October 17, 2025 at 11:20 a.m. revealed a soiled Band-Aid lying on the floor of the shower. The wall of the entrance to the shower was broken at the floor with missing tiles and the metal covering bent and sticking out. The wall next to the entrance to the bathroom was missing tiles and had broken tiles.Observations of the [NAME] unit bathroom on October 17, 2025 at 11:25 a.m. revealed a plastic light cover was broken and lying on the floor by the entrance door of the bathroom.Observation of the Rehab unit bathroom on October 17, 2025 at 11:30 a.m. revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility documentation, clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards when the facility failed to notify the physician of recommendations following a specialist consultation for one out of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 2). Review of Resident 2's clinical records reveal medical diagnoses that include: Spina bifida (a birth defect that mainly affects the spine), hydrocephalus (a complication that can be associated with spina bifida causing the abnormal buildup of the fluid that surrounds the brain), neurogenic bladder (a problem with the brain, nerves, or spinal column that causes loss of control of the bladder that can be associated with spina bifida), and neurogenic bowel (difficulty moving or controlling the bowels because of nerve damage that can be associated with spina bifida).Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed an after-visit summary dated January 3, 2025 from a Spina bifida specialist to the attention of the Nursing Supervisor stating: Please…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy and procedure review, observations, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment in the kitchen. Findings Include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Cleaning and Sanitation of Food Service Area, last revised July 2023 revealed the food service staff will maintain the sanitation of the dining and food service areas through compliance with a written, comprehensive cleaning schedule. Observation of the dishwashing area on March 25, 2025 at 2:45 p.m. revealed a large brown colored substance covering the wall behind the dishwashing machine. Interview with Dietary Employee E3 on March 25, 2025 at 3:10 p.m. confirmed that the walls were dirty and that there had been a buildup of debris behind the dish washing machine. 28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.6(f) Dietary services

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the wound care order was consistently followed for one of the three residents reviewed (Resident CL1). Findings include: A review of Resident CL1's diagnosis list includes Cerebrovascular Disease (an interruption in the flow of blood to cells in the brain) and Dementia (a term used to describe a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities severely enough to interfere with daily life). A review of the physician's wound consult dated November 11, 2024, revealed Resident CL1 had a worsening Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss) to the right gluteus (buttock) measuring 10.0 x 9.0 x 0.3 cm. with 40% slough (A non-viable yellow, tan, gray, green or brown tissue; usually moist, can be soft, stringy and mucinous in texture that may be adherent to the base of the wound or present in clumps throughout the wound bed) and 50% eschar ( Is dead or devitalized tissue that is hard or soft in texture; usually black, brown, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's policy, observations, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control prevention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) were in place for residents requiring enhanced barrier precautions for ten of ten residents reviewed (Residents 2, 21, 24, 28, 66, 70, 78, 123, 161, 170). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), dated August 2022, revealed EBP's employees targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply. EBP's are indicated for residents with wounds and indwelling medical devices regardless of MDRO (Multi Resistance Drug Organisms) colonization. Communication related to EBP precautions will be via signage, [NAME], or assignment sheets. PPE…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to monitor weights and notify the physician of significant weight changes for six of 10 residents reviewed for nutrition (Residents 2, 6, 43, 161, 173, and 174). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Weight Assessment and Intervention, dated March 2019, indicated that any weight change of 5 pounds or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken for confirmation, if the weight is verified, nursing will notify the Physician and Dietitian. Further review of the policy indicated that The Dietitian and /or Certified Dietary Manager will review the individual weight records to follow individual weight trends over time, making recommendations as appropriate. Negative trends will be evaluated for whether or not the criteria for significant weight change has been met. Review of Resident 2's Weight Summary revealed Resident 2 weighed 217 pounds on October 5, 2024. Further review of Resident 2's Weight Summary revealed Resident 2 weighed 184 pounds on November 4, 2024.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store frozen food in the main kitchen, and properly serve meals on one of five units observed (Rehab unit). Findings include: An observation of the walk-in freezer in the main kitchen was conducted on November 12, 2025, at 9:38 a.m., in the presence of the Assistant Food Service Director Employee E3. The observation revealed the following: Three boxes of frozen cookie dough in plastic bags, all were opened and unsealed; Unsealed frozen potatoes in a plastic bag; Unsealed frozen hamburger patties in a plastic bag; Unsealed frozen carrots in a plastic bag; and two plastic bags of chopped frozen chicken meat, both were opened and unsealed. An interview with Employee E3 conducted on November 12, 2024, confirmed that frozen food in a plastic bag should have been re-sealed after use. An observation of the meal pass was conducted on November 12, 2024, at 12:56 p.m., in the front hall Rehab Unit. The meal tray observation revealed peaches placed on a small bowl were uncovered. Apple juice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for three of the 35 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 67, and 123). Findings include: Review of Resident 2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - A standardized assessment tool that measures health status in long-term care residents) dated September 10, 2024 revealed Resident 2 had an indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube that drains urine from the bladder into a bag outside the body). Review of Resident 2's clinical record failed to reveal evidence of an indwelling urinary catheter. Interview with Licensed Employee E7 on November 15, 2024 at 11:00 confirmed Resident 2 did not have a urinary catheter and also confirmed Resident 2's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] did not accurately reflect Resident 2's status and was completed incorrectly. A review of Resident 67's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed resident was on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan for pressure ulcers was developed timely for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 85). Findings include: A review of Resident 85's clinical records revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a right heel Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss) measuring 3.8 x 3.2 x 0.2 cm. Clinical records review revealed Resident 85's pressure ulcer baseline care plan was not developed until July 2, 2024, a week after a resident was admitted and assessed with the presence of an unstageable pressure ulcer to the right heel. An interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on November 15, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., confirmed that Resident 85's baseline care plan for unstageable pressure ulcers was not developed until a week after it was identified. The facility failed to ensure Resident 85's unstageable pressure ulcer baseline care plan was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,516 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,516 — penalty dated 2026-01-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA