No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Loyalhanna Care Center

535 McFarland Road, Latrobe, PA 15650 · For profit - Partnership · 143 certified beds · (724) 537-5500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation2 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
121 W 2nd Ave · (724) 537-1000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
201 Depot St · (800) 338-3688 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1910 Dailey Ave · (724) 539-3080 · Call to confirm hours
Park
301-399 E 1st Ave · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.2%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.6%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.6%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.5%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened42.1%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.4%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.8%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.6%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.3%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.0%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.2%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.4%9.5%12.0%typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
29.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 29.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.7%CMS range 46.8–71.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 6.0–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge29.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge29.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified79.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.2–13.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.551.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.08
RN hours/ resident / day
0.52
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.22
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.82
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.69
RN hoursweekends
57.6%
Total nursing turnover
70.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 143 beds and averages 76.6 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 66 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.23 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-02)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

62 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, investigation reports, clinical records, and staff education records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect for one of five residents reviewed (Residents 2), resulting in a fall with a fractured hip. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding fall prevention, dated September 1, 2024, indicated that each resident will be assessed for their fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated August 8, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required substantial to maximum assistance for chair to bed and toilet transfers, used a walker, and had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (group of lung diseases that cause ongoing breathing problems). The resident's care plan,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and facility investigation reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an environment that was free of accident hazards for residents who were at risk for falls for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2) resulting in a fall with a hip fracture. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding fall prevention, dated September 1, 2024, indicated that each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. A annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated August 8, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required substantial to maximum assistance for chair to bed and toilet transfers, used a walker, and had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (group of lung diseases that cause ongoing breathing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with the proper food consistency as ordered by the physician for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1), who choked, requiring a hospital admission for hypoxia and aspiration. Findings include: A facility policy for therapeutic diet orders dated January 13, 2025, indicated that dietary and nursing staff are responsible for providing therapeutic diets in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated June 27, 2025, indicated that the resident was understood, could sometimes understand others, had a diagnosis of a stroke, and was on a mechanically altered diet (the texture of food is altered by chopping, grinding, blending, or mashing it to make it easier to chew and swallow). Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated May 22, 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication (drugs that affect a person's mental state, emotions, and behavior) for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 8).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding psychotropic medication use, dated January 1, 2026, indicated that psychotropic medications used on a PRN (as needed) basis must have a diagnosed specific condition and indication for use documented in the resident's medical record. Orders for PRN psychotropic medications, excluding antipsychotics, were to be limited to no more than 14 days, unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believed it was appropriate to extend the order beyond the 14 days. The medical record was to include documentation from the physician or prescriber for the rationale for the extended time period and was to indicate a specific duration.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory results as ordered by the physician for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 6), failed to ensure that bowel protocols were followed as ordered by the physician for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 8), and failed to provide pain medication as ordered by the physician for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 9). Findings include:An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated February 27, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had a diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD - a permanent condition that occurs when the kidneys are no longer able to function properly), and was receiving dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly). Physician's orders for Resident 6, dated March 17, 2026, included an order to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, facility contracts, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain records relating to dialysis communication and collaboration for two of three residents reviewed for dialysis (Residents 6 and 86), and failed to provide a hemodialysis bedside emergency kit for bleeding (a kit that contains several items including a tourniquet, dressings and gloves) for one of three dialysis residents reviewed (Resident 86).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding hemodialysis, dated January 1, 2026, indicated that the facility would provide the necessary care and treatment consistent with professional standards, which includes the ongoing assessment of the residents' condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatment.Review of the dialysis contract, dated May 3, 2023, revealed that the nursing facility shall provide ongoing communication with the dialysis center in order to maintain safe and appropriate care.An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for four of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 4, 76, 86). Findings include: The facility's policy for medication administration, dated January 1, 2026, indicated that staff are to sign the Medication Administration Record (MAR) after a medication is administered, and if the medication is a controlled substance, staff are to sign the narcotic book. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated February 28, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, was independent for most daily care needs, had diagnosis that included Fibromyalgia, (long-term condition that involves widespread body pain), and was receiving routinely scheduled and as needed pain medication. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated January 17, 2026, included for the resident to receive 5-325…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, resident interviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received foods that were served at appetizing temperatures. Findings include:The facility's policy regarding Food Temperatures, dated January 1, 2026, revealed that the facility will monitor food temperatures daily to ensure food is at the proper serving temperatures.Interview with a group of residents on March 31, 2026 at 11:00 a.m. revealed that their food is served cold when eating in the dining room. They stated that the food comes from the kitchen to the dining room and it is cold.Observations of tray line on March 31, 2026 at 12:08 p.m. revealed that the dietary staff were preparing the plates for the dining room. The plates were made and then placed on the trays for delivery into the dining room. There were no lids or covers placed over the food to keep it warm and there were times that the plate of food sat on the tray line for approximately five minutes before going to the dining room. The plates were then carried…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-02 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the proper food consistency was prepared for residents receiving a pureed diet as ordered by the physician. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding Therapeutic Diet Orders, dated January 1, 2026, revealed that residents would be provided food in the appropriate from as prescribed by the physician.The facility's menu for pureed lasagna for the meal served on March 31, 2026, revealed that the pureed lasagna should be placed into a food processor, blended until smooth and then staff should use the fork drip test and the spoon tilt test to confirm the texture is within the specifications.Observations during the lunch meal on March 31, 2026 at 12:28 p.m. revealed that the pureed lasagna had chunks in it that needed to be chewed. Interview with the Regional Dietary Manager on March 31, 2026 at 12:30 p.m. confirmed that the pureed lasagna had chunks in it and that it should not have.28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3) Nursing services. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the dignity of one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 94) who had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine).Findings include:A facility policy for Catheter Care dated January 1, 2026, indicated it is the policy of the facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use. Privacy bags will be available and catheter drainage bags will be covered at all times while in use.Review of clinical records for Resident 94 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with an indwelling urinary catheter, and had diagnosis that included neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or nerve problems). Observations of Resident 94 on March 30, 2026, at 10:50 a.m. revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for three of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 28, 35). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2025, revealed that Section N0415A1 (Antipsychotic) was to be checked if the resident took the medication during the seven-day look-back period; and Section N0450A (Antipsychotic Medication Review) was to be coded (1) Yes if the resident took an antipsychotic medication routinely since admission/entry or re-entry or the prior OBRA assessment, whichever was most recent. If the resident took an antipsychotic routinely, then Section N0450B (Has a gradual dose reduction been attempted) was to be coded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records reviews, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs of one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding comprehensive care plans, dated January 1, 2026, indicated that the facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident consistent with resident rights, that include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, and all services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment, and meet professional standards of quality. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3 dated March 13, 2026, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, was independent for most of her daily care needs, and was frequently incontinent of bowel. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to revise/update care plans for three of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 28, 76).Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated January 1, 2026, indicated that the purpose was to provide a consistent process for reviewing and revising the care plan for those residents experiencing a status change. The care plan will be updated with the new or modified interventions. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 28, dated January 24, 2026, indicated that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, usually understood and usually understands, required assistance from staff for his daily care needs and had diagnoses that included, benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlargement of the prostate gland that squeezes the urethra, which causes symptoms of frequent urination and difficulty starting urination), and had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible thin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bowel received appropriate treatment and services to restore as much normal bowel function as possible for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 3), and failed to ensure that physician's orders for an indwelling urinary catheter were followed for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 4).Findings include: The facility's policy regarding bowel and bladder management and training, dated January 1, 2026, indicated that the purpose of the policy was to promote continence, maintain resident dignity, prevent complications (skin breakdown, urinary tract infections, constipation, fecal impaction), and meet regulatory requirements through individualized bowel and bladder assessments, training, and management. The bowel training program is a planned bowel evacuation schedule utilizing diet, fluids, activity, positioning, and medications as needed. Bowel assessments were to be completed on admission, quarterly,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include:The facility's deficiencies and plan of corrections for an annual survey ending March 20, 2025, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending April 2, 2026, identified repeated deficiencies related to care plan creation, care plan revisions, quality care, pharmaceutical services, food in a form to meet an individuals needs, and infection control.The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding care plan creation, cited during the survey ending March 20, 2025, revealed that the facility would complete audits and report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control practices were followed while providing medications for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 67).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated January 1, 2026, indicated that staff were to remove the medication from the source, taking care not to touch the medication with their bare hand. Observations during medication administration on April 1, 2026, at 8:08 a.m. revealed that Registered Nurse 2 prepared to administer medications to Resident 67 and took out pills from the medicine cup with her bare hands and placed them in a bag to be crushed. She then administered the medications to Resident 67. Interview with Registered Nurse 2 on March 11, 2025, at 8:10 a.m. confirmed that she should not have touched the medication with her bare hands. Interview with the Director of Nursing on April 1, 2026, at 3:04 p.m. confirmed that staff were not to touch residents' medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for medications were followed for three of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 21, 75). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated January 13, 2025, revealed that medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Vital signs must be checked/verified for each resident prior to administering medications. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated February 18, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance to dependent with care needs, received insulin, and had a diagnosis of diabetes. Physician's order for Resident 1, dated December 20, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 16 units of Humalog insulin subcutaneously (medication administered into the subcutaneous fat under the skin) one time a day at 11:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to flush a peripherally-inserted central catheter (PICC- catheter inserted in a vein used to deliver fluids and/or medications) and a midline catheter (a type of peripheral catheter inserted into a large vein in the upper arm used to deliver fluids and/or medications) prior to and/or after medication administration for two of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 283). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding intravenous therapy (administration of fluids and/or medications directly into a person's vein), dated January 13, 2025, included to attach a 5 milliliter (ml) syringe of normal saline and confirm patency of vascular access device as per protocol prior to medication administration. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated February 18, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance to dependent with care needs,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label insulin with the date it was opened, failed to discard an expired insulin pen in one of two medication carts reviewed (North Hall), and failed to provide a separately-locked, permanently-affixed compartment in the refrigerator for the storage of controlled drugs (medications that can be abused). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication labeling and storage, dated January 13, 2025, indicated that when the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial are initially broken, the container or vial will be dated. The nurse shall place a date opened sticker on the medication and enter the date opened and the new expiration date. The expiration date of the vial or container will be 30 days unless the manufacturer recommends another date or regulations/guidelines require different dating. The nurse will check the expiration date of each medication before administering it. All expired medications will be removed from the active…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to honor a resident's right regarding diet consistency for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 8). Findings include: A facility policy regarding Promoting/Maintaining Resident Self-Determination/Resident Right to Refuse, dated January 13, 2025, indicated that it is the practice of the facility to protect and promote resident rights by facilitating resident self-determination through support of resident choice. The facility will ensure that each resident has the opportunity to exercise his/her autonomy regarding those things that are important in his/her life such as interests and preferences. Each resident has the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 8, dated February 5, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was understood and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan for three of 36 residents reviewed (Resident's 12, 21, 75). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated January 13, 2025, indicated that the facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and all services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 12, dated February 26, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with care needs, received an anticoagulant (blood thinner), and had a diagnoses that included a history of thrombosis (formation of a blood clot inside a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, a well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 46). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated January 13, 2025, indicated that the comprehensive care plan would be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS assessment. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 46, dated February 26, 2025, indicated that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, required staff assistance with care, and had a colostomy (an artificial opening in the bowel). Physician's orders, dated January 28, 2025, included orders for the resident to have a colostomy bag and wafer every shift. The resident's current care plan indicated that the resident had a colostomy and also had a history of placing silverware into her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, facility policies, clinical records, and facility investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify physician's orders for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 17) and failed to ensure that a licensed registered nurse followed professional standards regarding the administration of medications for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 75). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was responsible for assessing human responses and plans, implementing nursing care, analyzing/comparing data with the norm in determining care needs, and carrying out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. The facility's medication administration policy, dated January 13, 2025, revealed that medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policies, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that gastrostomy tube care was provided as ordered by the physician for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 17). The facility's policy regarding gastrostomy tubes (a tube inserted through the belly that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach), dated January 13, 2025, revealed that the facility would ensure that gastrostomy flushes were provided as ordered by the physician. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 17, dated December 12, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, did not speak, was totally dependent on staff for daily care needs, had a gastrostomy tube, and had diagnoses that included anoxic brain injury (due to a lack of oxygen to the brain). Physician's orders for Resident 17, dated June 21, 2024, included orders for the resident to have her gastrostomy tube flushed every four hours with 130 mL (milliliters) of free water. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify a resident's continuous oxygen order when not in use for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding oxygen therapy, dated January 13, 2025, indicated that oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the resident's goals and preferences. Staff shall document the initial and ongoing assessment of the resident's condition warranting oxygen and the response to oxygen therapy. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated February 18, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance with care needs, received oxygen therapy, and had a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (the heart can not pump blood well enough to meet the body's needs). Physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated January 13, 2025, indicated that staff were to sign the Medication Administration Record (MAR) after administering medications to residents. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated January 27, 2025, revealed that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, had frequent pain, received pain medication as needed, and received an opioid (a controlled pain medication). Physician's orders, dated February 17, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 50 milligrams (mg) of Tramadol (narcotic pain reliever) every six hours as needed for moderate pain. A controlled drug accountability record for February and March 2025 revealed that 50 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician responded timely to a pharmacy recommendation for four of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 23, 66, 68). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication regimen review, dated January 13, 2025, revealed that the consultant pharmacist was to perform a comprehensive review of each resident's medication regimen and clinical record at least monthly. The medication regimen review (MRR) included evaluating the resident's response to medication therapy to determine that the resident maintains the highest practical level of functioning and preventing or minimizing adverse consequences related to medication therapy. Recommendations were to be acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or the prescriber. The prescriber was to accept and act upon suggestions or rejected and provided an explanation for disagreeing. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, by failing to ensure that non-pharmacological (non-medication) behavioral interventions (individualized, non-pharmacological approaches to care), were attempted prior to the administration of as needed antianxiety medications for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 66). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding psychotropic medications (any medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior), dated January 13, 2025, indicated that non-pharmacological approaches must be attempted, unless clinically contraindicated, to minimize the need for psychotropic medications, use the lowest possible dose, or discontinue the medications. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 66, dated January 21, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory studies as ordered by the physician for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 53). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding laboratory specimens, dated January 13, 2025, revealed that the facility would provide or obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist in accordance with state law. The facility would provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 53, dated December 18, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, received dialysis services, received an anticonvulsant medication, and had diagnoses that included seizures and kidney failure. Physician's orders for Resident 53, dated September 5, 2021, included an order for staff to obtain a complete blood count with differential (CBC with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending April 11, 2024, as well as a complaint visit on May 22, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending March 20, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies related to a failure to develop care plans, care plan timing and revision, services provided to meet professional standards, to follow physician's orders, gastrostomy tube maintenance, oxygen therapy, preventing issues with the accountability of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for three of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 75, 283). Findings include: CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's - bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics, and these antibiotics can no longer be used to control or kill the bacteria), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to bowel medications for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated December 23, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, was cognitively intact, and was occasionally incontinent of bowel. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated December 19, 2024, included orders for the resident to receive 30 milliliters (mL) of Milk of Magnesia (an oral laxative) as needed for constipation if no bowel movement by the third day. If the Milk of Magnesia (MOM) was not effective then one Bisacodyl suppository (a laxative inserted rectally) was to be administered as needed for constipation. If there were no results from the MOM or suppository, then one Fleets enema (a liquid inserted rectally to stimulate a bowel movement) was to be administered as needed for constipation. Resident 2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents maintained acceptable parameters for nutritional status by failing to ensure timely notification of the dietician and physician about significant weight losses for two of six residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2), resulting in a delay in treatment for Resident 2, and failing to ensure timely notification of the physician about a decline in hydration consumption for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding weight assessment and intervention, dated January 13, 2025, indicated that if any resident had a weight change of five percent or more since the last weight, they would have the weight re-taken the next day for confirmation. If the weight was verified, nursing would immediately notify the dietitian/designee. The physician and the multidisciplinary team will identify conditions and medications that may be causing anorexia (an eating disorder that involves severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, as well observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential safety hazards related to the facility's hot water temperatures and failed to monitor temperatures weekly as per policy. Findings include: A facility policy for safe water temperatures, dated January 13, 2025, indicated that water temperatures will be set to a temperature of no more than 110 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or the state's allowable maximum water temperature. Maintenance staff will check water heater temperature controls and temperatures of tap water in all hot water circuits weekly and as needed. Documentation of testing will be maintained for three years and kept in the maintenance office. Observations of Maintenance Worker 1 checking water temperatures in the sink in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on February 12, 2025, at 11:11 a.m. revealed that the water temperature was 125 degrees F. Observations of Maintenance Worker 1 checking water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents had a clean and homelike environment on the South and North halls of the facility. Findings include: Observations on January 22, 2024, at 9:11 a.m. revealed that the floors in the hallway on the south side of the building contained what appeared to be scattered dirt/debris and three moderate size clumps of brown dust entering into Corridor B, and black marking, reported to be floor glue, in various locations on the vinyl flooring in the hallway. Varying amounts of dust and debris were noted on the carpeting in corridor A. Wallpaper on Corridor A on the South hall was noted to be peeling from the wall and had tape attempting to hold it in place, as well as peeling wallpaper above the kiosk in the hallway that had a brown, clumpy substance noted on the wall. rooms [ROOM NUMBER] had transition strips in the doorways that had pieces missing from them. The shower in the North hall had a pink substance noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers/baths as scheduled for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated November 5, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for showers, and had diagnoses that included dementia. Resident 2's bathing record, dated December 2024 and January 2025, revealed that the resident was to receive a shower every Sunday and Wednesday evening; however, there was no documented evidence that the resident was offered or refused a shower during the six days between December 4, 2024, and December 11, 2024; the 11 days between December 11, 2024, and December 23, 2024; the eight days between December 23, 2024, and January 1, 2025; the six days between January 1, 2025, and January 8, 2025; the six days between January 8, 2025 and January 15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, Resident Council meeting minutes, and grievance records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make ongoing efforts to resolve grievances for the residents. The deficiency is being cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding grievances, dated October 28, 2024, indicated that the facility would support each resident's right to voice grievances; to ensure that after receiving a complaint/grievance, the facility would take any immediate actions needed to prevent further potential violations of any resident rights; and would make prompt efforts to resolve grievances. The Grievance Official would take steps to resolve the grievance, and record information about the grievance, and those actions, on the grievance form, and would keep the resident appropriately apprised of the progress towards resolution of the grievances. Resident Council meeting minutes, dated September 11, October 16, and November 5, 2024, revealed that the residents reported staff were slow with answering call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and information provided by the facility, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items at appetizing temperatures. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding taste and temperature control, dated October 28, 2024, revealed that the temperatures of all food items will be taken and properly recorded prior to service of each meal. All hot food items must be cooked to appropriate internal temperatures, held and served at a temperature of at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F). All cold food items must be stored and served at a temperature of 41 degrees F or below. Observations of the lunch meal service in the main kitchen on December 6, 2024, revealed that the second North unit cart containing a test tray left the main kitchen at 12:19 p.m. and arrived on North unit at 12:20 p.m. Trays were passed to the residents that were in their rooms 12:21 p.m. and the last resident was served at 12:29 p.m. The test tray was removed from the cart at 12:30 p.m. and the temperature of the iced tea…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for three of four residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 3). Findings include: The facility's safe and homelike policy, dated April 10, 2024, revealed that the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment including comfortable and safe temperature level meaning that the ambient temperature should be in a relatively narrow range that minimizes residents' susceptibility to loss of body heat and risk of hypothermia/hyperthermia and is comfortable for the residents. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated August 21, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance with daily care needs. Interview with Resident 1 on October 23, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. revealed that her shower days are Monday and Friday afternoons. Resident 1 stated that during her showers the water temperature decreases to an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment in residents' rooms for 10 of 14 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding daily room cleaning of resident rooms, dated April 10, 2024, indicated that the purpose was to provide a safe, clean, and sanitary living environment for the residents. Dust mopping must be completed daily to reduce the amount of dust built-up in corners and along the edges of the room. Use a metal scraper to remove any build-up on the floors, with a focus on the corners/edges and front transition. Each housekeeper is responsible for inspecting their rooms at a minimum of three times each day. During the inspection the housekeeper is looking for overflowing trash, spills, and trash on the floor. Anything identified during the inspections must be addressed immediately. Observations of Resident 7's room on July 25, 2024, at 9:26 a.m., 11:17 a.m., and 1:55 p.m. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers as scheduled for two of 14 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 5). Findings include: A facility policy for resident showers, dated April 10, 2024, indicated that residents will be provided showers as per request or as per facility schedule protocols and based on resident safety. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated June 20, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood and able to understand others, required set up and clean up assistance from staff for showering, and had diagnoses that included dementia. Review of Resident 2's care plan, dated June 15, 2023, indicated that the resident had a self-care performance deficit and required assistance with care from staff as needed and that the resident preferred showers in the morning. Resident 2's bathing record revealed that the resident was to get a shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 1) and failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect caused by a failure to administer medications as ordered by the physician for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3, 4). Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated January 1, 2024, indicated that each resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated March 21, 2024, indicated that the resident was severly cognitively impaired, required the extensive assistance of staff with all her care needs, had diagnoses that included dementia, and had an indwelling urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, job descriptions, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a registered nurse administered medications as ordered by the physician for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3, 4). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. The facility's registered nurse job description signed by Registered Nurse 4 on May 1, 2024, indicated that the registered nurse was to supervise the day-to-day nursing activities of the facility during the tour of duty. The supervision was to be in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility investigations and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3, 4). Findings include: A witness statement from Licensed Practical Nurse 1, dated May 11, 2024, revealed that she was in the North nurses' station getting report when she overheard Resident 2 verbalize concerns of not receiving her nighttime medications to Registered Nurse 2. Resident 2 stated that her roommate got hers. After the report Licensed Practical Nurse 1 checked the cart and all of the medication packs for p.m. administration were out and not overlooked. The computer showed that p.m. medications were checked off. Then Registered Nurse 2 walked towards the nurses' station and stated that Resident 3 and Resident 4 stated that they were still waiting for their night medications. Licensed Practical Nurse 1 then went to tell the supervisor. They looked for the back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurately documented for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3, 4). Findings include: A witness statement from Licensed Practical Nurse 1, dated May 11, 2024, revealed that she was in the North nurses' station getting report when she overheard Resident 2 verbalize concerns of not receiving her nighttime medications to Registered Nurse 2. Resident 2 stated that her roommate got hers. After the report Licensed Practical Nurse 1 checked the cart, and all of the medication packs for p.m. administration were out and not overlooked. The computer showed that p.m. medications were checked off. Then Registered Nurse 2 walked towards the nurses' station and stated that Resident 3 and Resident 4 stated that they were still waiting for their night medications. Licensed Practical Nurse 1 then went to tell the supervisor. They looked for the back hall empty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address specific care needs for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 61). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated January 1, 2024, indicated that resident care plans were to be developed, reviewed and revised, as necessary, when residents experience a status change. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 61, dated February 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could usually understand, was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for care needs, and was administered opioid medication. Physician's orders for Resident 61, dated March 29, 2023, included orders for the resident to receive an x-ray of the left knee due to increased pain. The findings of that x-ray concluded that the resident had moderate to severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 11). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plan development and revision, dated January 1, 2024, indicated that resident care plans are reviewed and revised, as necessary, when residents experience a status change. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 11, dated February 2, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, was independent with most care needs, and was occasionally incontinent of urine. Physician's orders for Resident 11, dated March 19, 2024, revealed that the resident was to receive Keflex (an antibiotic) 500 milligrams (mg) two times a day for a urinary tract infection (infection involving any part of the urinary system including the kidney, ureters, bladder, and urethra). Nurse's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify a physician's order for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 51). Findings include: The facility's policy for hemodialysis (treatment to remove extra fluid and waste from the blood when the kidneys are not able to), dated January 1, 2024, revealed that the facility will ensure that each resident receives care and services for the provision of hemodialysis consistent with professional standards of practice. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide suprapubic urinary catheter care as ordered by the physician for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding indwelling urinary catheters, dated January 1, 2024, revealed that physician orders would be followed regarding the size, need for and frequency of catheter changes. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated February 13, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with most daily care needs, had an indwelling supra pubic catheter (a thin tube inserted into the bladder to allow urine drainage), received hospice services, and had diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated February 10, 2024, included orders for the resident to have a 16 French catheter with a 30 ml (milliliter) balloon (an inflatable balloon that helps keep the catheter inside the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policies, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that gastrostomy tube care was provided as ordered by the physician for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 60). The facility's policy regarding gastrostomy tubes (a tube inserted through the belly that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach), dated January 1, 2024, revealed that the facility would ensure that gastrostomy flushes were provided as ordered by the physician. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 60, dated March 2, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, does not speak, was totally dependent on two staff for daily care needs, had a gastrostomy tube, and had diagnoses that included anoxic brain injury (due to a lack of oxygen to the brain). Physician's orders for Resident 60, dated January 15, 2024, included orders for the resident to have her gastrostomy tube flushed every four hours with 190 mL (milliliters) of free water. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy as ordered for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 51). Findings include: The facility's policy for oxygen administration, dated January 1, 2024, revealed that oxygen therapy will be administered under orders of a physician and staff will document the initial and ongoing assessment of the resident's condition warranting oxygen and the response to oxygen therapy. Staff shall notify the physician of any changes in the resident's condition, including changes in vital signs, oxygen concentrations, or any complications related to use of oxygen. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 51, dated February 4, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff with daily care needs, used supplemental oxygen, and had diagnoses including cardiomyopathy (a disease that affects the heart muscle that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0729 — isolated
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to verify registry verification prior to allowing individuals to work as a nurse aide for two of three newly hired nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aides 3, 4). Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated January 1, 2024, revealed that the facility would verify registry with the Pennsylvania Nurse Aide Registry prior to hire for all nurse aides. The personnel file for Nurse Aide 3 revealed that she was hired by the facility on February 14, 2024. However, there was no documented evidence that the facility verified the nurse aide's standing with the state nurse aide registry until April 10, 2024. The personnel file for Nurse Aide 4 revealed that she was hired by the facility on January 18, 2024. However, there was no documented evidence that the facility verified the nurse aide's standing with the state nurse aide registry until April 10, 2024. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on April 11, 2024, at 1:04 p.m. confirmed that Nurse Aides 3 and 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for two of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 51, 61). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated January 1, 2024, indicated that the nurse would sign the Medication Administration Record (MAR) after the medications are administered. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 51, dated February 4, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff with daily care needs, had pain that was rated 8 on a pain scale of 0-10 (a common measurement of pain intensity with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain possible), and received opioid pain medication on a routine and as needed basis for pain management. Physician's order for Resident 51, dated January 29, 2024, included an order for the resident to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly maintain the freezers in two of two medication rooms (North and South), and failed to discard expired medical supplies in one of two medication rooms (South). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication storage, dated [DATE], revealed that the facility would ensure that all medications and equipment stored in the medication rooms would be maintained and stored to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, moisture control, and function. Observations in the North medication room refrigerator/freezer on [DATE], at 9:03 am. revealed that there was a large build up of ice on the roof of the freezer that was dripping water onto the bags containing medications that were stored in the refrigerator. An interview with Registered Nurse Supervisor 2 and the Assistant Director of Nursing on [DATE], at 9:36 a.m. confirmed that the freezer should not have a large build up of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending May 3, 2023, as well as complaint visits on July 14, 2023, and January 26, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending April 12, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to a failure to care plan timing and revision, services provided to meet professional standards, gastrostomy tube maintenance, and label/store drugs and biologicals. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff followed proper infection control practices during wound care for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 22). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding hand washing and hand hygiene, dated January 1, 2024, indicated to use alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 60 to 95 percent alcohol or soap and water when indicated with accepted standards of practice. The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 22, dated January 25, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for all daily care, and had a pressure ulcer (wound caused by pressure) that was present on admission to the facility. The resident's current care plan indicated that she was at risk for skin break down related to immobility and had a Stage III (full thickness wound) pressure ulcer to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items at palatable temperatures. Findings include: A facility policy regarding food safety for your loved one, dated January 1, 2024, indicated that foods should be stored at appropriate temperatures to maintain safety. Cold foods should be kept at 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or less and hot foods should be held at 135 degrees F or higher. Observations of the lunch meal service in the main kitchen on March 21, 2024, revealed that the South 200 Hall cart containing a test tray left the main kitchen at 12:06 p.m. and arrived on South 200 Hall at 12:07 p.m. Trays were passed to the residents that were in their rooms. The last resident was served at 12:22 p.m. The test tray was removed from the cart at 12:23 p.m. and the temperature of the chocolate milk was 48.1 degrees F, the ice cream was 17 degrees F, the hot tea was 102 degrees F, the mixed vegetables were 121 degrees F, beef and noodles with Stroganoff gravy were 113 degrees F. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, clinical records, and the facility's investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible and failed to develop and implement interventions to prevent falls for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy for managing falls and fall risk, dated January 1, 2024, indicated that nursing staff in conjunction with the attending physician, consultant pharmacist, therapy staff, and others will seek to identify and document risk factors for falls and establish a resident-centered falls prevention plan based on relevant assessment information. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of the resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated January 29, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff with daily care tasks, including transfers and ambulation, had a history of falls, and had diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care-planned interventions for advanced directives were consistently implemented for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding Do Not Resuscitate orders, dated January 1, 2024, indicated that the interdisciplinary care planning team would review advance directives with the resident during quarterly care planning sessions to determine if the resident wishes to make changes. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated November 13, 2023, indicated that the resident was usually understood, could sometimes understand, was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with bathing, and was dependent on staff for transfers and toileting. An advance directive care plan for Resident 3, dated December 28, 2021, indicated that the resident had a code status of do not resuscitate (DNR) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, facility policies, and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that treatments performed were documented by the nurse who performed the treatment for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.18. Standards of nursing conduct (a)(5)(8) indicated that the registered nurse was to document and maintain accurate records. Not to falsify or knowingly make incorrect entries into the patient's record or other related documents. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.148. Standards of nursing conduct (a)(5)(8) indicated that the licensed practical nurse was to document and maintain accurate records. Not to falsify or knowingly make incorrect entries into the patient's record or other related documents. The facility's policy regarding charting and documentation, dated January 1, 2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding charting and documentation, dated January 1, 2023, indicated that the following information was to be documented in the resident medical record: Objective observations, changes in a resident's condition, treatments and services performed, and events, incidents, or accidents involving the resident. An admission summary note, dated January 15, 2024, indicated that Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE]. The resident was alert and oriented to person, place and time. A social service note for Resident 2, dated January 18, 2024, indicated that the facility received a call late at night regarding the resident sitting on a bed pan for four hours. Resident 2 told staff she was put on the bed pan but was not removed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-03-20 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a written notice regarding emergency transfer to the hospital was provided to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and failed to ensure that a written notice was provided to the resident and the resident's representative regarding the reason for transfer to the hospital for eight of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 6, 12, 15, 20, 23, 32, 33). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated February 18, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance to dependent with care needs, had an indwelling/suprapubic catheter (a flexible tube that drains urine from the bladder through the abdomen), and had a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder (bladder lacks control due to nerve or muscle problems). A nursing note for Resident 1, dated February 27, 2025, at 6:10 p.m., revealed that the resident had an elevated temperature,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
QUEST HEALTHCARE DEVELOPMENT INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF73%since 01/01/1990
SOOHEY, MATTHEWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
WUKICH, DANIELIndividualGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/15/2009

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 44%Medicare 1%Other / private 55%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$276per resident / day
operating cost
$8,393per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$235per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395860. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next