No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Buffalo Valley Lutheran Villag

189 East Tressler Boulevard, Lewisburg, PA 17837 · Non profit - Corporation · 102 certified beds · (570) 524-2221 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (570) 524-2221 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0610) — most recent Jun 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
205 Bull Run Xing Unit 1 · (570) 524-4473 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
350 N 10th St · (570) 523-3261 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Giant0.7 mi
224 Hardwood Dr · (570) 524-9868 · Call to confirm hours
Park
499 Fairground Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
999 Buffalo Rd · (570) 966-3088

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased23.2%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.7%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.3%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened29.5%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.9%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.7%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.4%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.6%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.4%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.6%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.7%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.581.621.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.951.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 256 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
47.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 47.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.0%CMS range 51.5–62.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 7.2–13.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge47.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge30.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 3.2–9.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.731.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
1.39
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.56
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.40
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
47.5%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 71.5 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.40 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.51 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-26)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to practice appropriate handwashing technique to distribute food in a manner to prevent potential food borne illness on two of four open nursing units (Chestnut and Country Lane, Employees 1, 2, 3, and 4).Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Personal Hygiene and Health Reporting, last reviewed April 10, 2026, revealed that all food and nutrition services employees will be trained in appropriate personal hygiene and health reporting. Personal hygiene criteria to follow include that hands should be washed in the designated handwashing sinks and hair restraints must be worn around exposed foods, in the kitchen, food service areas, and dining areas. The facility policy entitled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, last reviewed on April 10, 2026, revealed that all personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections. Hand hygiene products and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately implement a safety intervention to prevent potential resident injury for one of eight residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 6); and failed to ensure an environment free from potential accident hazards for residents with elopement behaviors for one of one resident reviewed for elopement concerns (Resident 4). Findings include: The State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, requires facilities to provide an environment that is free from accident hazards over which the facility has control, which includes implementing interventions to reduce hazards and risks. Observation of Resident 6's bedroom on September 23, 2025, at 12:35 PM, September 24, 2025, at 2:55 PM, and September 25, 2025, at 11:40 AM revealed the resident was lying in bed and the bed was not in a low position. Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to the care and assessment of residents with enteral tube feeding, who utilize a lift, catheter care, medication administration, transmission based precautions, intravenous therapy, and dressing changes for four of four employees reviewed for competencies (Employees 2, 3, 4, and 5). Findings include: A review of the facility documentation revealed that the facility had a total of 87 residents receiving medications, 25 residents that utilize lifts, five residents with indwelling urinary catheters (insertion of a tube into the bladder to remove urine), 12 residents with dressing changes, 23 residents with enhanced barrier precautions, one resident with intravenous therapy (technique that delivers fluids, medications, and nutrients directly into a patient's bloodstream through a vein), and one resident with enteral tube feedings (device that allows liquid food to enter your stomach or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items in a safe and sanitary manner and maintain the environment in a safe and sanitary condition in the facility's main kitchen.Findings included: Observation of the facility's main kitchen with Employee 6, dietary manager, on September 23, 2025, at 9:03 AM revealed the following: The splash guard on the wall adjacent to the dishwasher had a black, greasy build-up on it and the surrounding hoses. The dishwasher room had a rack holding various items. The bottom shelf of the rack held various cooking pans that were identified as clean by Employee 6. The cooking pans and the splash guard under them contained a significant number of debris, crumbs, and dirt and were not protected from the ambient environment. The floor of the walk-in cooler had debris, which included food debris and dirt, especially under the food storage racks. There were two red-colored puddles of fluid on the floor of the cooler. The bottom shelf of a rack held a box of chicken breasts with rib meat and had a puddle of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide timely notification to a resident whose payment coverage changed for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 93 and 57).Findings include: A review of the form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123, (a notice that informs the recipient when care received from the skilled nursing facility is ending; and how to contact a Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) to appeal) revealed instructions that a Medicare provider must ensure that the notice is delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services end. Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN, CMS-10055) is issued if the beneficiary intends to continue services and the SNF believes the services may not be covered under Medicare. It is the facility's responsibility to inform the beneficiary about potential non-coverage and the option to continue services with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policy and procedures, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's rights to secure and confidential personal and medical information in the facility's main lobby for one of one resident reviewed for privacy concerns (Main Lobby Area; Resident 94). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Confidentiality, last reviewed without changes on April 7, 2025, revealed a policy statement to ensure that a resident's confidential health information is protected from use or disclosure that is in violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) or other applicable federal or state requirements. Further review of the policy revealed that an individual's protected health information (PHI) should not be discussed with those not entitled to the information. Observation of the main lobby of the facility on September 26, 2025, at 9:30 AM revealed a binder titled Department of Health Surveys. The binder contained the results of the most recent survey of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop baseline care plans within 48 hours of admission for two of 18 residents reviewed (Residents 5 and 33).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 5 revealed that the facility admitted him on September 5, 2025. Hospital transfer documentation dated September 5, 2025, revealed that his medication regime included the administration of Warfarin (anticoagulant medication used to prevent and treat blood clots) daily at 3:00 PM. Nursing documentation dated September 5, 2025, at 5:00 PM revealed that Resident 5 arrived at the facility after hospitalization for left lower extremity cellulitis (common bacterial infection of the layers of the skin) from a venous stasis ulcer (wound that occurs due to poor blood flow in the veins). Resident 5's medication administration record (MAR, electronic documentation of the administration of medications) dated September 2025 revealed that Resident 5 received the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding wound assessment for one of three residents reviewed for skin concerns (Resident 58). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 58 revealed a diagnosis list that included dementia (general term to describe a group of symptoms related to loss of memory, judgment, language, complex motor skills, and other intellectual function, caused by the permanent damage or death of the brain's nerve cells, or neurons). Further clinical record review for Resident 58 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated August 28, 2025, that noted facility staff assessed the resident as rarely/never understood. A review of the task list (located in the electronic health record where staff document specific care related events for a resident) for Resident 58 revealed that staff were to apply a moisture barrier to the buttocks with incontinence care. Resident 58's care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess and implement treatment and services to promote the healing of pressure ulcers for one of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer concerns (Resident 63).Findings include: The policy entitled Pressure Injury Treatment Protocol, last reviewed without changes April 7, 2025, revealed the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of existing pressure injuries. All pressure injuries will be assessed every week and as needed using the 52 Week Wound Assessment. If the wound does not improve in 14 days, the facility is to notify the physician, re-evaluate nutritional support, offloading or redistribution devices, and advanced wound product changes. Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 63 on April 15, 2025. Nursing documentation dated April 15, 2025, at 5:08 PM revealed Resident 63 was admitted with a Stage 2 (partial thickness loss of skin with exposed dermis) on her sacrum, measuring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and family and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for one of two residents reviewed for range of motion concerns (Resident 7).Findings include: Interview with Resident 7's family on September 23, 2025, at 10:23 AM revealed Resident 7 was struggling to walk now. She stated that Resident 7 has been unsteady and has a difficult time lifting his right foot. Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 7 on October 18, 2022. Review of Resident 7's MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated April 3, 2025, revealed Resident 7 had no limitations to his range of motion, and was able to walk 150 feet with supervision of staff, or touching assistance. Review of a therapy referral form dated June 7, 2025, revealed Resident 7's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess and implement individualized interventions to promote bowel continence for one of two residents reviewed for incontinence (Resident 7).Findings Clinical record review revealed a quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) assessment dated [DATE], that staff assessed Resident 7 as continent of his bowel. Further review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed an MDS assessment completed on April 3, 2025, noting staff assessed Resident 7 as now occasionally incontinent of bowel, and a significant change MDS completed on June 30, 2025, revealed staff assessed Resident 7's bowel continence declining to now being frequently incontinent of bowel. Interview with the Director of Nursing and Nursing Home Administrator on September 26, 2025, at 1:37 PM revealed the facility did not have a policy addressing bowel continence. Review of Resident 7's plan of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medication security for two of 18 residents reviewed (Residents 4 and 62).Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Discarding and Destroying Medications, last reviewed without changes on April 7, 2025, revealed that non-controlled and Schedule V (non-hazardous) controlled substances will be disposed of in accordance with state regulations and federal guidelines regarding disposition of non-hazardous medications. Should the facility contract with a DEA-registered collector, controlled substances may be disposed of in an authorized collection receptacle located at the facility. Both controlled and non-controlled substances may be disposed of in the collection receptacle. For unused, non-hazardous controlled substances that are not disposed of by an authorized collector, the steps include mixing the medication (either liquid or solid) with an undesirable substance (to include sand, coffee grounds, kitty litter,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free from pests in the main kitchen area.Findings include: Observation of the facility's main kitchen on September 23, 2205, at 9:03 AM with Employee 6, dietary manager, revealed the following: The wall of the dishwashing area contained multiple black colored, winged, smaller insects. At least four were observed on the wall. A concurrent interview with Employee 6 revealed that these insects have been present for at least one and a half weeks and the facility placed traps to help remedy the insects. Further observation of the main part of the kitchen revealed multiple additional black colored, winged insects located on the ceiling next to a vent. The ceiling area adjacent to the vent had unidentified splash stains. A large spider was observed walking across the floor in the area that held the heated meal delivery carts and proceeded to enter a floor drain. The above information was reviewed in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, facility grievance log documentation, clinical record review, and family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make a prompt effort to resolve resident grievances for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Resident Grievance Report and Tracking Log, last reviewed April 7, 2025, revealed that the facility, upon receiving a concern or grievance, would actively seek a resolution and keep the resident/health care agent appropriately apprised of the findings towards resolution. Upon receipt of a grievance or concern, the community staff member receiving the grievance or concern will immediately initiate a Resident Concern/Grievance Report. All pertinent data will be gathered and documented to promptly investigate, follow through, and provide timely resolution to the grievance/concern. Resolution will be communicated to the resident, health care agent or surrogate, and documented on the Resident Concern/Grievance Report. The grievance officer will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff and family interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and report to the appropriate agencies an incident of potential resident abuse for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Abuse/Neglect Prevention and Response, last reviewed April 7, 2025, revealed that an allegation of potential or actual abuse, neglect, or exploitation will be immediately reported to the appropriate leadership and government agencies, the resident protected, and the allegation investigated. The definition of abuse includes willful intimidation with resulting pain or mental anguish. Physical abuse is defined as hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and the like. It also includes controlling a resident's behavior through physical punishment and/or intimidating behaviors such as shaking a finger in a resident's face. It is the facility's responsibility to investigate each concern that is raised and it is the Administrator who is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and resident family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physical restraint was used for the treatment of medical symptoms for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Abuse/Neglect/Mistreatment of Residents/Misappropriation of Resident Property, last reviewed without changes on January 25, 2025, revealed that the facility standard is that the facility protects each resident's right to be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of property through appropriate screening, training, prevention, identification, investigation, protection, and reporting/response procedures. Physical abuse includes, but is not limited to, hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, etc. It also includes controlling behavior through corporal punishment. Prevention includes that through training, the facility will reinforce with employees their responsibility to identify, correct, and intervene in situations in which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate resident incidents and implement individualized interventions to prevent falls for one of seven residents reviewed for fall concerns (Resident 7). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Fall Management, last reviewed without changes on January 25, 2024, revealed that the definition of a fall includes that unless there is evidence suggesting otherwise, when a resident is found on the floor, a fall is considered to have occurred. The purpose of the procedure is to provide assessment, after care, and identify new interventions to prevent further falls. As soon as possible after caring for the resident, the nurse will complete an Incident and Investigation Report and a Post Fall Investigation form. Staff document pertinent information regarding the fall in the resident's electronic health record. Interview with Resident 7's sister on August 27, 2024, at 10:26 AM revealed that Resident 7 fell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff, resident, and family interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions, consistent with physician orders and resident preferences, for two of two residents reviewed for nutrition and hydration concerns (Residents 43 and 66). Findings include: Interview with Resident 43 on August 27, 2024, at 11:28 AM revealed that he was to abide by a physician ordered fluid restriction. Resident 43 stated that he was not sure how much fluid he was allowed and, they (staff) take care of it. Clinical record review for Resident 43 confirmed that the physician ordered an 1800 ml (milliliter) fluid restriction within which dietary would provide 360 ml per each day shift meal. Interview with Resident 43 during observation of the lunch meal on August 27, 2024, at 1:19 PM revealed that he did not receive milk as per his meal tray ticket. Resident 43 stated that he requested cranberry juice and milk. Review of Resident 43's tray ticket confirmed that he circled cranberry juice and milk as his beverage choices. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized person-centered care plans to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by three of three residents reviewed (Residents 52, 60, and 79). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 52 revealed the facility admitted her on February 24, 2021. A diagnosis of dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life) was added on November 8, 2022. A review of Resident 52's most recent annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated July 3, 2024, indicated that the facility assessed Resident 52 as having a diagnosis of dementia. The facility determined that a care plan for dementia and cognitive loss would be developed. A review of Resident 52's care plan revealed that there was no indication that the facility had developed and implemented a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medication for one of five residents selected for medication regimen review (Resident 7). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 7 revealed a physician order dated March 13, 2024, for staff to administer Zyrtec (allergy medication) 10 mg (milligrams) by mouth one time a day for, .cold and runny nose. A consultant pharmacist review dated April 5, 2024, requested that the physician evaluate the need for Resident 7's continued daily use of Zyrtec. The physician accepted the recommendation with the direction to reassess the need for the medication in two weeks. Resident 7's clinical record contained no evidence that staff reassessed Resident 7's need for the Zyrtec medication after two weeks. The physician order for Resident 7's Zyrtec remained active until it was discontinued on July 3, 2024. A review of Medication Administration Records (MARs, electronic documentation of the administration of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff and family interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and the resident representative received written notice that specified the duration of the bed-hold policy for one of seven residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident 7). Findings include: Interview with Resident 7's sister on August 27, 2024, at 10:29 AM revealed that Resident 7 had been to the hospital. Resident 7's sister stated that all communication from the facility regarding the hospitalization was verbal, and she did not receive any written notices. Clinical record review for Resident 7 revealed nursing documentation dated June 28, 2024, at 8:45 PM that staff found Resident 7 on the floor in her room. Staff assessed swelling to Resident 7's forehead, notified the physician, and obtained instructions to send her to the emergency department for testing. The documentation noted, RP (responsible party) aware and gave verbal request for bed hold. The surveyor requested evidence of written information to Resident 7's responsible party that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 2 and 88). Findings include: Review of Resident 88's closed clinical record revealed a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated May 29, 2024, that indicated the facility indicated that Resident 88 was discharged from the facility to a hospital setting. Nursing documentation dated May 29, 2024, at 10:58 AM indicated that Resident 88 was discharged home with her husband. Interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing on August 29, 2024, at 10:26 AM confirmed that Resident 88's discharge location was coded in error on the MDS dated [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed an MDS dated [DATE], that indicated that staff assessed Resident 2 as being on an antibiotic. Further review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed no evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered weight assessments for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 43). Findings include: Interview with Resident 43 on August 27, 2024, at 11:36 AM revealed that he often has swelling of his lower extremities and weight gain due to fluid retention. Resident 43 stated that he is to abide by a physician ordered fluid restriction. Clinical record review for Resident 43 revealed active physician orders as follows: Fluid restriction, 1800 ml (milliliters) related to congestive heart failure (inefficient ability of the heart to pump blood and oxygen through the body; causes blood and fluids to collect in inappropriate areas like the lungs and legs over time) Lasix (Furosemide, diuretic medication used to remove excess fluid from the body) oral tablet 80 MG (milligrams) by mouth one time a day related to acute and chronic respiratory failure (insufficient oxygenation of the body) Physician orders instructed staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide physician ordered services to maintain a resident's range of motion for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 23) and failed to provide services to maintain a resident's range of motion for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 40). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 23 revealed a current physician's order dated October 15, 2023, where occupational therapy indicated that staff should place a palmar roll (foam cushioning) on her right hand every evening at bedtime (HS) for contracture prevention. Resident 23 was to wear the palmar roll per her tolerance at HS with staff completing skin checks each shift while the palmar roll was worn. There was no documentation available that indicated staff placed the palmar roll nightly or completed skin checks while the palmar roll was placed. Observation and concurrent interview with Resident 23 on August 27, 2024, at 10:12 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to receive informed consent and assess for the risk of side rail entrapment for two of six residents reviewed for accident hazards (Residents 12 and 66). Findings include: Observation of Resident 12's room on August 27, 2024, at 9:57 AM and August 28, 2024, at 10:53 AM revealed that there were bilateral one-quarter enabler bars (side rails) on the bed. Clinical record review for Resident 12 revealed a nursing enabler bar assessment dated [DATE], that indicated Resident 12 was assessed by therapy for enabler bars. Therapy indicated that Resident 12 did not need enabler bars. On August 13, 2024, maintenance staff evaluated the one-quarter enabler bars on Resident 12's bed and indicated that they passed for potential entrapment. There was no documentation that indicated the facility received consent from Resident 12 or their responsible party to utilize enabler bars, that the facility provided education to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility staff education records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all nurse aide staff completed a minimum of 12 hours of in-service education training each year for two of three nurse aides reviewed (Employees 1 and 2). Findings include: During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) on August 28, 2024, at 1:00 PM the surveyor requested evidence of annual in-service education for Employee 1, nurse aide, hired January 10, 2017, and Employee 2, nurse aide, hired June 5, 2023. Interview with the NHA on August 29, 2024, at 12:20 PM confirmed that Employee 1 only completed 7.25 hours and Employee 3 only completed 9.0 hours of the required 12 hours of annual in-service education, which included dementia training, abuse prevention training, and any areas of weakness or resident special care needs in the past year. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.20(a)(d) Staff development 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c) Nursing services

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food in a safe and sanitary environment in the facility's main kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the facility's main kitchen on August 29, 2023, at 10:05 AM with Employee 4, chef, revealed the following: A foot pedal garbage inside the entrance of the kitchen to the preparation area was covered in dried debris and dried food splatter on the exterior of the can. The exterior door and sides of an upright ice cream freezer contained dried food and food splatter. The backsplash of the stove was observed covered with dried food splatter, which extended to the walls behind the stove area, the sides of the stove, and the lower shelf of a preparation table to the left of the stove. Two kettle units to the right of the stove were observed with dried food on the sides of the kettle, back, and sides of the base of the kettle stand. The tilt kettle was observed with dried food on the sides and back of the tilt kettle. The flooring under the stove, kettles, and tilt kettle had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy to the resident or responsible party for two of six residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident 50 and 81). Findings include: Review of Resident 81's clinical record revealed that the facility sent him to the hospital on June 29, 2023. There was no documented evidence in Resident 81's clinical record to indicate that the facility provided him, or his responsible party written information on the facility's bed hold policy. Clinical record review for Resident 50 revealed the resident was sent to the hospital on June 28, 2023, and admitted . There was no evidence to indicate Resident 50's responsible party was provided written information on the facility's bed hold policy. Interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing on August 31, 2023, at 12:12 PM confirmed the above findings for Resident 81 and 50. 483.15(d) Notice of bed-hold policy and return Previously cited 9/30/22 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two of two residents reviewed (Residents 3 and 32). Findings include: Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated March 10, 2023, indicating that the facility assessed him as being on an antibiotic. Resident 3's MDS dated [DATE], also indicated that the facility assessed him as being on an antibiotic. Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed no documented evidence of his physician ordering an antibiotic during the lookback time frames for his March 10, 2023, and June 6, 202,3 MDS. Interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing on August 31, 2023, at 9:32 AM confirmed that Resident 3's MDS's were coded in error for using an antibiotic. Review of Resident 32's clinical record revealed an annual MDS dated [DATE], indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and care for the prevention of skin excoriation for one of one resident reviewed for skin concerns (Resident 23). Findings include: Review of a consultant wound evaluation for Resident 23 dated August 1, 2023, revealed the resident had MASD (MASD, moisture associated skin damage, excoriation of the skin due to prolonged exposure to feces, urine, or perspiration) that measured 0.6 cm (centimeter) x 0.3 cm. The wound was improved as evidenced by the decreased surface area. House barrier cream (protective skin care such as Calmoseptine ointment) was to be applied once daily for 16 days. Review of the TAR (TAR, treatment administration record) for Resident 23 dated August 8 through 21, 2023, revealed that Calmoseptine ointment was applied to the sacrum (low back) area daily for 14 days then the physician indicated to reassess for a new treatment. Review of a consultant wound evaluation for Resident 23 dated August 15, 2023, revealed the consultant signed off from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and services for two of two residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents 309 and 310). Findings include: Observation of Resident 309 on August 29, 2023, at 11:28 AM revealed a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP, a machine used during sleep to keep the airway open) machine in the resident's room. A concurrent interview revealed the resident utilized the CPAP, every night. An opened gallon container of distilled water was also noted. The container did not have an opened date on the bottle. Observation of Resident 309 on August 30, 2023, at 11:24 AM revealed a CPAP mask draped across the top drawer of the resident's bedside dresser. The mask was not bagged or protected from contamination from the ambient environment. The opened container of distilled water still did not have an opened date marked on it. Observation of Resident 309 on August 30, 2023, at 12:28 PM revealed the CPAP mask was still draped across the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess for risk of side rail entrapment and review the risk and benefits of side rail utilization with the resident or resident representative for two of 11 residents reviewed for accident hazards (Residents 70 and 309). Findings include: Observation of Resident 70 on August 29, 2023, at 2:16 PM revealed the resident's bed had bilateral side rails. A concurrent interview revealed the resident was not aware why the side rails were on the bed, for safety, I think. Clinical record review for Resident 70 revealed no informed consent, assessment for risk of side rail entrapment, or a review of the risks and benefits of side rails with the resident. Documentation for Resident 70 titled Enabler Evaluation, that was dated August 28, 2023, at 1:37 PM revealed an evaluation form that noted that side rail replacement recommendations were marked as none, and side rail placement was documented as Side Rails / Assist Bar are not indicated at this time. Observation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nurses demonstrated competency in skills necessary for resident care for three of four staff reviewed for bladder scanning competencies (Employees 1, 2, and 3; Resident 14). Findings include: Review of a physician's order dated June 22, 2022, through July 29. 2023, for Resident 14 revealed the nurse was to perform a bladder scan (a device that measures an approximate volume of urine within the bladder, to determine if the bladder needs emptied when a person cannot empty the bladder to prevent kidney damage and/or infections) every shift and if the amount was greater than 250 ml (milliliters), the nurse was to straight catheterize the resident. If having to straight catheterize the resident frequently, get a urology (a physician who specializes in medical illness related to the urinary tract, i.e., bladder, kidneys, and associated area) appointment. Review of a physician's order dated July 29, 2023, from August 20, 2023, for Resident 14 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regimen was free from potentially unnecessary medications for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 14). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 14 revealed the resident had a diagnosis of unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic (out of touch with reality) disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of a physician's order for Resident 14 dated July 20, 2023, revealed the nurse was to administer lorazepam (a controlled substance prescribed for anxiety) 1 mg (milligram), give 0.25 tablet orally two times a day for agitation and anxiety and 0.25 tablet every six hours as needed for agitation and anxiety. Review of the August MAR (MAR, medication administration record) for Resident 14 revealed the resident received as needed Ativan (brand name for lorazepam) on August 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 15, 2023. Clinical record review for Resident's 14 revealed there was no physician's order limiting the timeframe of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to arrange for routine dental care to the extent covered under the State plan for one of two residents reviewed for dental concerns (Resident 50). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 50 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An observation of Resident 50 on August 29, 2023, at 11:40 AM revealed the resident had natural teeth and some buildup was observed on the resident's teeth. A family member present in Resident 50's room at the time of the observation indicated she was not aware of the resident being offered or receiving dental services since he was admitted to the facility. The family member noticed the resident needed a dental cleaning, and indicated the resident was always very good about receiving dental care routinely prior to residing at the facility. Further clinical record review for Resident 50 did not reveal any evidence the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-09-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly contain and dispose of garbage at two of two observed facility dumpsters.Findings include: Observation of the main dumpsters outside of the kitchen dock entrance with Employee 6, dietary manager, on September 23, 2025, at 9:30 AM revealed the following: There were discarded medical gloves, debris, paper products, and a washcloth around two of the dumpsters. The top of one dumpster had a discarded plastic apple sauce container and unidentified debris between the lids. The above information was reviewed in a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on September 24, 2025, at 2:00 PM. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-09-01 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident and/or the resident's responsible party in writing of a transfer to the hospital for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 24, 50, and 81). Findings include: Review of Resident 81's clinical record revealed that the facility transferred him to the hospital on June 29, 2023. There was no documented evidence to indicate that the facility provided a written notice to Resident 81 or his responsible party regarding his transfer to the hospital that included the required contents: reason for the transfer, effective date of the transfer, location to which the resident was transferred to, contact and address information for the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and information for the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy of individuals with developmental disabilities. Clinical record review for Resident 50 revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on June 28, 2023, for a change in condition and admitted . There was no evidence to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-09-01 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post at the beginning of each shift the nurse staffing information in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. Findings include: Observation of the facility's main entrance on August 29, 2023, at 9:06 AM revealed the current posting of nurse staffing information that included the facility name, current date, total number, and the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff, and the resident census was dated August 23, 2023. During an interview with the Employee 8, Executive Director, on August 29, 2023, at 10:01 AM the surveyor asked for the nurse staff posting information for the past 30 days. There was no staffing information from August 24 through August 28, 2023. The staffing sheet for August 29, 2023, was provided for after the surveyor asked. The surveyor reviewed the above findings with the Nursing Home Administrator on August 30, 2023, at 2:00 PM. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3) Nursing services

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES EASTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/17/1975
BEUMER, BRENTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/27/2022
CHRISTELL, ROYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/25/2017
MEADOWS, MEGANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/24/2022
MUELLER, HARRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/26/2016
SCHROEDER-SAULNIER, DEBORAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/26/2016
SOMBART, LISAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/25/2017
ANDERSON, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2019
BROWN, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/25/2018
SNEED, CHADWICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2020
COOPER, VALERIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/17/2009
PASSI, VIKASIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-41.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 22%Medicare 4%Other / private 74%

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$215per resident / day
operating cost
$6,549per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$153per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395261. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next