Oak Glen Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center
15 Ridgecrest Circle, Lewisburg, PA 17837 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 226 certified beds · (570) 524-2271 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.6% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.9% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.1% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.7% | 20.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.7% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.4% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.5% | 17.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.5% | 68.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.6% | 22.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.3% | 9.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.25 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.14 | 1.18 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
64.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 183 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 93 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 64.8%CMS range 58.9–71.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 7.0–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 71.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 71.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.9%CMS range 3.3–9.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.83 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 226 beds and averages 109.2 residents a day — about 48% occupied, or roughly 117 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to keep confidential all information in a resident's medical record for three of eight residents reviewed (Residents 3, 5, and 8). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled, HIPAA Privacy and Security Policy, dated March 20, 2025, revealed that the facility, is committed to safeguarding the privacy and security of all Protected Health Information (PHI) in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), including the Privacy Rule, Security Rule, and Breach Notification Rule. All employees, contractors, volunteers, students, medical staff, consultants, and other workforce members are responsible for protecting the confidentiality and security of all Protected Health Information (in oral, written, electronic, or any other recorded form) that is obtainable, handled, learned, heard, or viewed in the course of work or association with the Facility. The facility defines PHI as, Identifies or can reasonably be used to identify a resident or patient; and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at palatable temperatures on one of three open nursing units (Evergreen, Residents 2 and 3).Findings include: Interview with Resident 2 on September 24, 2025, at 11:16 AM revealed the resident chooses to eat meals in his room. Resident 2 stated sometimes the coffee and food are cold. Interview with Resident 3 on September 24, 2025, at 11:40 AM revealed the resident chooses to eat meals in the dining room and stated the coffee is cold. Observation of the lunch meal service on the Evergreen unit on September 24, 2025, at 12:17 PM, where Residents 2 and 3 reside, revealed dietary and nursing staff serving resident's lunch in the unit dining room from a steam table located in the same room. Nursing staff were observed passing beverages to residents seated in the dining room from a beverage cart that had pitchers water, and iced tea, as well as plastic gallon containers of milk, and air pots (containers utilized to hold hot beverages…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food and maintain food service equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's main kitchen, and two of three open nursing units (Memory Care and Evergreen). Findings include: An observation in the facility's main kitchen on August 19, 2025, with Employee 1, dining director, revealed the following: Tile flooring extending through the corridor to enter the kitchen food preparation and food storage areas and extending in front of the dishwashing area was significantly dull, blackened, and contained dried spills, dirt, and debris, which was also observed in the corners of the doorway entrance to the area. Three hot food mobile carts were observed just inside the kitchen. Employee 1 indicated they were used to transport pans of food to the nursing units for meal service. The interior base of all three was soiled with dried spills and dried food debris. Employee 3,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, the facility's grievance documentation, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement effective corrective action in response to a resident's grievance related to staff call bell response for seven of seven residents reviewed for call bell response concerns (Residents 20, 108, 111, 48, 93, 107, and 3).Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Call Light Policy, effective March 20, 2025, revealed that the call system will be monitored regularly to ensure it is functioning properly. The call light must be kept accessible to the resident at all times. Any malfunctioning call lights must be reported to maintenance or the supervisor immediately. If necessary, staff will use the manual bell as indicated. Review of a Resident Concern Form dated July 17, 2025, revealed that Resident 20 (who resided on the Evergreen unit) voiced concerns related to call bells. Resident 20 reported that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment free from the potential spread of infection for two of two residents reviewed for antibiotic use (Residents 107 and 111), for three of three residents reviewed for transmission based precautions (Residents 3, 48, and 51), and for the facility's water management program.Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Contact Precautions, effective March 20, 2025, indicated that the purpose of the policy is to use contact precautions for residents known or suspected of having infectious diseases or epidemiologically significant pathogens transmitted by direct resident contact or by contact with items in the resident's environment. Gloves should be worn when entering the room and while providing care for a resident. Gloves should be removed before leaving the resident's room and hand hygiene should be performed immediately. The Contact Precautions sign utilized by the facility noted that,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident dignity during dining on one of three open nursing units (Memory Care, Residents 18 and 36). Findings include:An observation of the lunch meal service in the Memory Care unit on August 19, 2025, at 11:48 AM revealed multiple residents seated in the dining room awaiting the lunch meal. Resident 36 and Resident 18 were observed seated at a table together with beverages in front of them. Employee 15, nurse aide, was observed placing a sandwich on the table in front of Resident 36 and stated, Don't touch that yet because [Resident 18] doesn't have anything, as Employee 15 proceeded to deliver a sandwich to another table. Immediately as Employee 15 was walking to another table, Resident 36 picked up the sandwich, and as Employee 15 was walking back by the resident Employee 15 stated, I told you not to touch that yet. Resident 36 responded, I know, I was just looking to see what kind it was. At 12:00 PM Resident 36 was observed taking the last bite of the sandwich with Resident 18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that written notice, including the reason for a room change, was provided to a resident prior to a facility-initiated room change for one of one resident reviewed for concerns related to resident choice (Resident 107).Findings include: Observation of Resident 107 on August 20, 2025, at 11:03 AM revealed he was in a wheelchair in front of the nursing unit's nurses' station. Interview with Resident 107 on August 20, 2025, at 11:03 AM revealed that he believed that he was moving from the [NAME] nursing unit to the Evergreen nursing unit on this date, before lunch. Resident 107 stated that he was not sure why he was moving to a new room or to what room he was moving. Resident 107 stated that he was not shown any rooms on a different nursing unit and that if staff told him a room number it would mean nothing to him without seeing it. Resident 107 stated I hope not, when asked if he was going to have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) for dependent residents for two of two residents reviewed for ADL concerns (Residents 107 and 90). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 107 revealed that the facility admitted him on August 14, 2025 (Thursday). Observation of Resident 107 on August 20, 2025, at 11:09 AM revealed that his hair appeared uncombed and oily. Resident 107 presented with facial hair indicative of numerous days without shaving. Interview with Resident 107 on the date and time of the observation revealed that he had not received a shower yet at the facility. Resident 107 also confirmed that no staff had assisted him with shaving since his admission to the facility. Resident 107 stated that on this day, nursing staff supplied him with shaving equipment. Interview with Employee 8 (licensed practical nurse) on August 20, 2025, at 11:10 AM confirmed that she provided Resident 107 shaving equipment on this date.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent resident elopement for one of two residents reviewed for elopement concerns (Resident 15).Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Wandering Residents, implemented March 20, 2025, indicated that the facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents, and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering. The facility is equipped with door locks/alarms and all high-risk areas are secured. The facility shall establish and utilize a systematic approach to monitoring and managing residents at risk for unsafe wandering including identification and assessment of risk, evaluation and analysis of hazards and risks, implementing interventions to reduce…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to the care and assessment of residents with indwelling catheters and medication administration for three of four employees reviewed (Employees 4, 11, and 14). Findings include: A review of the facility Resident Matrix (CMS-802, form used to identify pertinent care categories for residents who reside in the facility) documentation revealed that the facility had a total of 15 residents with indwelling urinary catheters within the 100 resident census. A review of sampled residents of the current resident population revealed that the facility had multiple residents that received medications. A request by the surveyor for staff competencies that included indwelling catheter care and medication administration was made for Employee 4 (registered nurse), Employee 11 (licensed practical nurse), and Employee 14 (licensed practical nurse). The facility provided multiple trainings for the above…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient competent dietary staff to perform essential kitchen duties (Employee 2).Findings include:Observation and interview with Employee 2, dietary aide, on August 19, 2025, at 9:30 AM revealed the employee was washing breakfast dishes and flatware in the dish room area of the main kitchen with an industrial dish washing machine. Upon request of the dish machine temperature log (documentation of machine wash and rinse temperatures to ensure proper sanitization), Employee 2 indicated she was not aware of the temperature log. Employee 2 indicated she had worked at the facility as a dietary aide for one month and was working independently as she had served food on one of the nursing units, washed some items in a dishwasher on the unit, and then came to the main kitchen to wash additional items. Employee 2 then stated another employee who works as a dish washer comes in later in the morning, but she was responsible to get the breakfast dishes/utensils washed before the dish washer comes in. Employee 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurate for three of 20 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 82, and 105). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 4 revealed a care plan that noted the resident has a potential alteration in nutritional status related to the medical history. An intervention included to provide and serve diet and supplements as ordered and monitor intake and record every meal. Further review of Resident 4's care plan revealed the resident has a pressure ulcer and an intervention included to monitor nutritional status. The care plan instructed staff to serve the diet as ordered and monitor intake and record. A review of Resident 4's meal intakes for the last 30 days revealed the following days were not recorded as directed in the resident's care plan:July 26, 2025August 5, 2025August 9, 2025August 15, 2025August 18, 2025 Clinical record review for Resident 82 revealed a care plan that noted the resident has a potential alteration in nutritional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to administer a pneumococcal vaccine to a resident who consented to and was eligible to receive it for one of five residents selected for vaccination review (Resident 53).Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Infection Control - Vaccination Policy, last reviewed January 16, 2025, revealed that the purpose of the policy is to prevent infection and control the potential spread of COVID-19, influenza, and pneumococcal pneumonia through adherence to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccination guidelines and recommendations. Each resident is offered immunization unless it is medically contraindicated, or the resident has already received the vaccine. Refer to the CDC guidelines for vaccine type and timing: CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing. CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults (https://www-new.cdc.gov/pneumococcal/downloads/Vaccine-Timing-Adults-JobAid.pdf)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and staff and family interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate maintenance services to maintain an orderly environment in a main hallway of the facility (Resident 29). Findings include: Interview with Resident 29's family on September 24, 2024, at 11:20 AM revealed that the facility has had a leaking roof in the hallway for a while now. Observation of a hallway located near the facility's beauty shop on September 26, 2024, at 10:12 AM revealed that the roof was leaking through the ceiling tiles onto the carpeted area. The hallway connects nursing units and provides residents with access to services such as the beauty salon, human resources, therapy, and administration. The facility had two large trash cans placed under the leak attempting to catch the dripping water. There were two large ceiling tiles that were saturated with water with holes in them that were dripping water into the trash cans and surrounding carpet. There was a six-foot area of wet carpet surrounding the trash cans. There was a musty wet odor that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding cardiac pacemakers and central venous catheters for three of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 27, 61, and 82). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 27 revealed nursing documentation dated September 9, 2024, at 7:45 PM that Resident 27, .returned to facility. Report from hospital staff that line was kinked, and they were able adjust it. It is now patent. Active physician orders for Resident 27 included instructions to change a PICC line (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter, thin, soft, flexible tube inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart for the administration of fluids or medication) intravenous dressing every Wednesday. The orders also included instructions to instill heparin (an anticoagulant medication that prevents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items and maintain equipment in a sanitary manner in the facility's main kitchen. Findings included: Initial tour of the facility's main kitchen with Employee 5, General Dietary Manager, on September 24, 2024, between 9:15 AM and 9:40 AM revealed the following: A large circulating fan in the dishwashing area had a significant build-up of dust on the protective guards. The dry storage room contained an open container of peanut butter with no open date on it. A walk-in freezer had a package of croissants that were open and uncovered, exposing several of them to the ambient air. A walk-in cooler had the following findings: a head of celery on a shelf that was not covered exposing it to ambient air; five unused packages of butter in a cardboard box that were partially open and another partially used package of butter that was open and not dated; an open package of mixed vegetables that had a build-up of moisture on the package and no open date on it; two large onions and one partially used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to establish clear and consistent resident wishes regarding advance directives for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 66). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 66 revealed a current physician's order initiated on [DATE], that indicated her code status (the type of emergency care to be initiated if the resident's heart stops or they stop breathing) to be DNR (Do not resuscitate). Further clinical record review revealed a facility form entitled, Decision of Agent, Guardian, or Health Care Representative Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR, an emergency procedure that combines chest compressions and rescue breathing when a person's heartbeat or breathing has stopped) Status of Incompetent Resident that indicated the Resident's health care agent did not wish to decide at this time regarding the resident's CPR status. The form was signed and dated [DATE]. The Director of Nursing and Nursing Home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care or services to maintain a resident's ambulation status for one of two residents reviewed for ambulation concerns (Resident 17). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 17 revealed a Restorative Program Note dated September 5, 2024, at 1:30 PM that indicated she would start a new restorative program for ambulation. The program details include for her to be ambulated with a front wheeled walker in straight paths with the assistance of one staff with one staff to follow with a wheelchair. Review of the task documentation (electronic documentation of care provided) for the dates of September 5-25, 2024, revealed a task for Restorative ambulation to be completed every shift. Interview with Employee 6 (Assistant Director of Nursing) on September 26, 2024, at 2:00 PM revealed that the expectation was for the task to be completed once a day. She said it was scheduled every shift so that if one shift did not get the task done, the next shift could do it. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately use a positional device related to contractures for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 80). Findings include: Observation of Resident 80 on September 25, 2024, at 9:20 AM revealed she was sitting in the dining room with a travel neck pillow positioned behind her neck. Resident 80's neck naturally is contracted forward and to her left. The bulk of the travel pillow was positioned with the middle directly on the back of her neck, essentially pushing her neck further forward. Review of Resident 80's clinical record revealed an admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated July 10, 2024, that indicated the facility assessed Resident 80 as having range of motion limitations to one side of both her upper and lower extremities. There was no documented evidence to indicate the use of a travel neck pillow in Resident 80's clinical record until after this surveyor's observations.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a complete medical record was accessible to the survey team timely for one of six residents reviewed (Residents 10). Findings include: The surveyor reviewed the requirement for resident electronic health records (surveyor access to any information that should be a part of the resident's medical record) during an entrance conference interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on September 24, 2024, at 8:53 AM. Clinical record review for Resident 10 on September 24, 2024, at 11:19 AM (first day of the onsite survey) with the Nursing Home Administrator and Employee 6 (assistant director of nursing) revealed that the surveyors' access to the electronic medical record did not permit the review of all physician orders available for Resident 10. The physician orders available did not include any medications or advance care planning decisions for Resident 10. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on September 24, 2024, at 12:15 PM indicated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to offer the COVID-19 vaccine to one of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident 59). Findings include: Current CDC guidelines at https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html recommend that everyone ages six months and older should get a 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine protection decreases over time, so it is important to stay up to date with your COVID-19 vaccine. This includes people who have received a COVID-19 vaccine before and people who have had COVID-19. Interview with Employee 7 (registered nurse/infection control prevention coordinator) on September 26, 2024, at 8:47 AM indicated that any information regarding a resident's vaccination history is contained in the electronic medical record under the immunization section. Employee 7 stated, that's what I go by. Clinical record review for Resident 59 revealed that the facility admitted him on August 19, 2022, and his most recent COVID-19 booster was administered on February 14, 2023. Resident 59's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered medications for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 70). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 70 revealed a current physician's order dated March 2, 2023, for staff to administer Oxybutynin Chloride (for incontinence) 2.5 milligrams (mg) every day by mouth for one week (March 9, 2023) then stop. Observation of a medication administration pass on October 24, 2023, at 9:00 AM with Employee 7, licensed practical nurse, revealed that she administered Oxybutynin 2.5 mg by mouth to Resident 70. Review of Resident 70's clinical documentation revealed that staff continued to administer Resident 70's Oxybutynin until after the surveyor identified the concern on October 26. 2023. The surveyor reviewed the above information during an interview on October 26, 2023, at 10:00 AM with the Nursing Home Administrator. 483.25 Quality of Care Previously cited 10/21/22 28 Pa. Code 211.10(c) Resident care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items in a safe and sanitary manner in the facility's main kitchen and on one of six nursing units (Evergreen Nursing Unit). Findings include: A tour of the facility's main kitchen with Employee 4 (Kitchen Operations Manager) and Employee 5 (General Manager) on October 24, 2023, at 9:03 AM revealed the following concerns: The ceiling in the dishwashing area had a section of chipped and missing paint. A concurrent interview with Employee 4 revealed it was unclear what had damaged the ceiling. There was an accumulation of debris on the floor under the stainless steel shelves adjacent to the dishwasher against the wall. An outside entrance leading to the dumpsters had a barrel full of grease positioned on a pallet adjacent to a storm drain. There was a large accumulation of dead leaves under the pallet. The lid was partially ajar, and grease was visible at the lip of the barrel. Employee 5 reported the grease was from the facility fryers and it was unclear how long it had been there. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policy and procedures, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to determine a resident's capability to self-administer their medications for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 12). Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, revealed that residents have a right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. Observation of Resident 12 on October 24, 2023, at 11:32 AM revealed the resident had Biofreeze Gel (a medication used to relieve minor aches and pain) and Fluticasone nasal spray (a medication used to treat certain nasal conditions and seasonal allergies) on the bedside table. A concurrent interview revealed Resident 12 used the gel for aches and the nasal spray for a clogged nose. Current physician orders for Resident 12 revealed an order for fluticasone propionate 50 microgram (mcg) / actuation nasal spray suspension as needed; administer two sprays each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policies, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an abuse prohibition policy to ensure a complete and thorough investigation of an incident involving the potential for abuse for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 60). Findings include: The policy entitled Resident Rights - Abuse and Crimes against last reviewed without changes on September 21, 2023, revealed that residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. The administrator or designee is responsible for initiating an investigation as soon as reasonably practicable and completing the investigation in a timely manner. Results of all investigations of alleged violations must be reported within five working days of the incident. Upon receiving any allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, or injury of unknown source, the administrator/designee is responsible for determining what actions (if any) are needed for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for one of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 87). Findings include: Review of Resident 87's clinical record revealed a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated October 2, 2023, indicating that the facility assessed her as being discharged to the hospital. A nursing progress noted dated September 21, 2023, at 7:55 AM indicated that Resident 87 was discharged from the facility with home health services. Interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing on October 26, 2023, at 2:01 PM confirmed that Resident 87's MDS was coded in error for discharge status. 483.20(g) Accuracy of Assessments Previously cited 10/21/22 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f)(ix) Medical records 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident, responsible party, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dependent resident assistance with nail care for one of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident 11). Findings include: A phone interview with the responsible party for Resident 11 on October 25, 2023, at 10:41 AM revealed concerns related to the resident's fingernail care and reported the nails were long with dirt under them. The responsible party reported speaking to several people several times about the concerns, but the concerns were not corrected. Observation of Resident 11's fingernails on October 25, 2023, at 11:12 AM with Employee 8, nurse aide, revealed the resident's nails were long with obvious black colored debris noted under the right thumb and pointer finger. The resident voiced, They look terrible. A concurrent interview with Employee 8 revealed the fingernails may be long because the resident is a diabetic and staff would have to check with the nurse prior to trimming. Clinical documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide physician ordered services to maintain a resident's range of motion for one of four residents reviewed (Residents 19). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 19 revealed a current 's order for staff to provide restorative continuous AROM (active range of motion, movement of the body in an attempt to maintain a resident's ability) with assistance as needed (PRN) to her bilateral (BL) shoulders, elbows, and wrists for two sets of 10 repetitions each and restorative continuous PROM (passive range of motion) to her BL knees and ankles for three sets of 10 repetitions each. Review of task documentation for Resident 19 for August, September, and October 2023, revealed that staff did not document completion of the restorative task on the following dates: AROM BL Shoulders, Elbows, and Wrists August 29, 2023 September 4, 6, 16, and 29, 2023 October 17, 2023 PROM BL Knees and Ankles- August 29, 2023 September 6, 16, and 29, 2023 October 17, 2023 The surveyor reviewed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent falls and/or injuries for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 60). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 60 revealed a current physician's order for staff to check the (motion) alarm to ensure that it is intact to the door to decrease intrusions in the room by other residents. Observation of Resident 60 on the following dates and times revealed that the motion alarm did not sound upon entry to her room: October 24, 2023, at 9:47 AM and 10:02 AM October 25, 2023, at 10:45 AM October 26, 2023, at 10:21 AM Concurrent interview on October 26, 2023, at 10:21 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that Resident 60's motion alarm did not sound upon entry to her room. The DON replaced Resident 60's alarm. 483.25(d)(1)(2) Free Of Accident Hazards/supervision/devices Previously cited 10/21/22 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.10(d) Resident care policies 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services regarding bladder incontinence for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: The policy entitled Urinary Incontinence-Clinical Protocol, last reviewed on September 21, 2023, indicates that the facility's physician will look for findings related to continence, categorize the incontinence as urge, stress, overflow, or functional, and will address the treatable causes of urinary retention and incontinence. The policy further indicates that nursing staff will identify, and document circumstances related to the incontinence, and based on assessment of the category and causes of incontinence, will provide scheduled toileting, prompted voiding, or other interventions to try to improve the individual's continence status. Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAK GLEN OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/06/2024 |
| AYSAN TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/06/2024 |
| COPPER PA TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/06/2024 |
| PA NBK HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/06/2024 |
| RIVERWOODS OPCO INVESTCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/06/2024 |
| STAR PA I HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/06/2024 |
| STAR PA I TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/06/2024 |
| RICH, YIKZCHOK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/06/2024 |
| BARTLETT, AMBER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/20/2025 |
| PASSI, VIKAS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/20/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395283. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.