Lecom At Snyder Memorial

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 96.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-03-06 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of established guidelines from the American Heart Association (AHA) for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR - emergency life-saving procedure that is done when the heart stops beating and when performed immediately can double or triple chances of survival after cardiac arrest), facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide CPR as required for one of one resident reviewed who had requested that CPR be administered in the event that they became unresponsive with no pulse. Resident R1 became unresponsive and pulseless, facility did not administer CPR to Resident R1 as required. This failure placed 43 of 95 residents ( R2, R3, R4 R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21 R22, R23 R24 R25, R26, R27 R28, R29, R30, R31, R32 R33, R34, R35 R36, R37, R38 R39, R40, R41, R42, R43, and R44), that had requested to have CPR administered if they became unresponsive and pulseless, at a high risk for death and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-29 · tag F0711 — pattern
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the attending physician documented required visits by writing, signing, and dating a physician progress note for each visit for 22 of 26 Residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R12, R13, R14, R18, R20, R23, R26, R36, R49, R59, R76, and R85). Findings include: Facility policy entitled Physician Visits dated 5/13/26, revealed The attending physician must make visits in accordance with applicable state and federal regulation. The attending physician must visit his/her patient at least once every thirty (30) days for the first ninety (90) days following the resident's admission, and then at least every sixty (60) days thereafter. A physician assistant or nurse practitioner may make alternate visits after the initial ninety (90) days following admission, unless restricted by law or regulation. and A physician visit is considered timely if it occur not later than ten (10) days after the date the visit was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Care Plans - Baseline dated 5/13/26, revealed The resident and/or representative are provided a written summary of the baseline care plan (in a language that the resident/representative can understand) that includes, but is not limited to the following:The stated goals and objectives of the resident. A summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions.Any services and treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/7/25, with diagnoses that included Asthma (a long-term lung disease that causes the airways to narrow and make it difficult to breath), hypothyroidism (a condition when the thyroid produces low amounts of thyroid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to reflect the current care and services for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents R6 and R85).Findings include: Facility policy entitled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 5/13/26, revealed Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. Resident R6's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/21/12, with diagnoses that included hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction (a condition where urine cannot properly drain from the kidney due to blockage), diabetes (a health condition that is caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Resident R6's progress notes revealed a note dated 2/12/26, indicated that his/her urinary catheter was removed. Resident R6's Care Plan for altered genitourinary system dated 12/16/25, revealed interventions to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and manufacturer's guidelines, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately discard outdated medications for one of two medications rooms (West) and one of four medication carts (West One). Findings include: Facility policy entitled Medication Labeling and Storage dated 5/13/26, revealed Multi-dose [NAME] that have been opened or accessed (e.g., needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that an open vial of Tubersol (a solution used for tuberculosis testing upon admission and employment) should be discarded within 30-days after opening. Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that and open vial of Insulin Glargine (also known as Lantus - medication used to treat diabetes) should be discarded within 28-days after opening. Observation of drug storage on 5/26/26, at 1:52 p.m. on the [NAME]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a safe and sanitary manner in the dishwashing area of the main kitchen.Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Sanitization dated 5/13/26, revealed The food service area is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner .All utensils, counters, shelves, and equipment are kept clean. Observations conducted on 5/26/26, at approximately 10:40 a.m. of the main kitchen revealed one fan over the meal prep area and one fan in the dishwashing area with a thick layer of dust and a fuzzy substance. Interview conducted with the Kitchen Manager at that time confirmed that the one fan over the meal prep area and the one fan in the dishwashing area had a thick layer of dust and a fuzzy substance. 28 Pa. Code 211.6(f) Dietary services 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of trash in the garbage dumpster and failed to dispose of boxes in the recycling dumpster properly for two dumpsters observed outside of the building.Findings include:Facility policy entitled Sanitization dated 5/13/26, indicated Garbage and refuse containers are in good condition, without leaks, and waste is properly contained in dumpster/compactors with lids.Observations on 5/26/26, at approximately 12:30 p.m. of the garbage dumpster revealed several bags of trash heaping out of the container and the lid could not be closed and the recycling dumpster revealed several boxes heaping out of the container and the lid could not be closed.During an interview on 5/26/26, at approximately 12:40 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the garbage dumpster had several bags of trash heaping out of the container and the recycling container had several boxes heaping out of the container, and that both containers lids could not be closed. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI-manual that guides facilities with completing resident Minimum Data Set [MDS-periodic assessment of resident care needs] assessments), clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the MDS to accurately reflect the resident's status at the time of the assessment for seven of 21 residents reviewed (R8, R9, R13, R15, R41, R55, and R76). Findings include: Review of the October 2024 RAI Manual revealed that restraints (a device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body) used in the seven-day assessment look-back period were to be documented in Section P (Restraints and Alarms) of the MDS, coding 0 for not used, 1 for used less than daily, and 2 for used daily. Review of Resident R8's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/09/08, with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide oxygen according to physician's orders for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident R34). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Oxygen Administration dated 4/1/25, indicated Check physician's order for liter flow . Review of facility policy entitled Documentation, Clinical dated 4/1/25, indicated Documentation shall be done by nursing staff according to the needs of the resident and the care provided. Review of Resident R34's clinical record revealed an admission date of 7/6/23, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (when your lungs do not have adequate air flow), chronic respiratory failure (a condition where your lungs don't exchange air properly), and sleep apnea (a condition when a person repeatedly stops and starts breathing when they are sleeping). Review of Resident R34's physician's orders revealed an order for O2 (oxygen) via NC (nasal cannula-oxygen tubing that has prongs that go into…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, observations, staff interviews, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention and control isolation by failing to remove isolation precautions for non-transmittable diseases which were confirmed by laboratory testing for three of five residents reviewed on droplet precautions (a type of transmission based precautions used to prevent the spread of respiratory infections) (Residents R56, R77, and R33). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Policy on Isolation and Infection Precautions dated 4/1/25, revealed when it is determined that a resident needs isolation or special infection precautions to prevent the spread of infection, the appropriate isolation and/or precautions are utilized. Review of the facility policy entitled Infection Prevention & Control Program dated 4/1/25, revealed prevention of spread of infections is accomplished by the use of Standard and Transmission based precautions and other barriers, appropriate treatment and follow-up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to reflect the current care and services for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R34). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Care Plans dated 4/1/25, indicated The care plan will be reviewed, evaluated and updated with any significant change ., and Care plans will outline resident's care needs based on . physician orders . Review of Resident R34's clinical record revealed an admission date of 7/6/23, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (when your lungs do not have adequate air flow), chronic respiratory failure (a condition where your lungs don't exchange air properly), and sleep apnea (a condition when a person repeatedly stops and starts breathing when they are sleeping). Review of Resident R34's physician orders revealed an order for O2 (oxygen) via NC (nasal cannula-oxygen delivery) 2-3LPM (liters per minute) continuous, goal sats (oxygen saturation percent) 88-92%,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$25,853 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $25,853 — penalty dated 2024-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA