Delaware Valley Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation C

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 347 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 160 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 61.5 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record and select facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide effective pain management and administer pain medication as prescribed by the physician and failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain prior to the administration of a narcotic pain medication as prescribed for two resident out of 15 residents reviewed (Resident 10 and Resident 2). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy entitled Pain Management Policy with a policy review date of May 13, 2025, indicated that the physician will order appropriate nonpharmacological and medical interventions to address the individual's pain. A clinical record review revealed Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on February17, 2025, with diagnoses that include Spina Bifida, (a neural tube (the embryonic structure that develops into the brain and the spinal cord that forms the central nervous system) defect that occurs when the fetus's spine does not close completely during early development causing symptoms of incontinence, loss…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that nursing services met professional standards of quality as required by the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, by failing to ensure Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) administering intravenous (IV) therapy via a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) possessed the required education, competency, and supervision for one of 15 residents reviewed (Resident 63).Findings include: A review of the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Chapter 21.145 (Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse), revealed that an LPN must perform nursing functions based on appropriate knowledge, skill, and competency, and may administer IV therapy only after completing the required IV therapy education and training. The regulation further requires that IV therapy be performed under the direction and supervision of a licensed professional nurse (RN) or other authorized health care provider. The regulation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to ensure appropriate assessment and ongoing monitoring of a surgical wound in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of fifteen residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Skin Policy, last reviewed May 13, 2025, indicated that upon admission, licensed nursing staff complete a head-to-toe skin assessment and document all findings in the nursing clinical assessment. The policy indicated staff document all skin impairments and wounds in the Skin Assessment Section of the admission Screener and on the skin assessment forms, to include measurements (length, width, and depth, including tunneling or undermining, which refers to channels or areas of tissue destruction under the skin), and a detailed description of the wound bed (the visible tissue within the wound), including the presence of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy, a review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to monitor resident weights consistently and accurately to timely identify changes in nutritional parameters and implement nutritional interventions for one resident out of 15 residents reviewed (Resident 47).Findings include: A review of a facility policy entitled Resident Heights and Weight Policy last reviewed by the facility May13, 2025, indicated residents will be weighed upon admission to facility and on day two after admission. After the second day weight, all newly admitted residents will be weighed weekly for four weeks and then on a monthly basis unless otherwise specified. The resident weights will be recorded in the electronic medical record. Reweighs will be obtained for any residents whose weight fluctuates by plus or minus five pounds (lbs.) for those over 100 lbs. and plus or minus three pounds for those weighing less than 100 pounds. The licensed nurse will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to maintain accurate records of controlled drugs and ensure accurate drug administration for one of 15 residents reviewed (Resident 10). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Controlled Substances, last reviewed March 13, 2025, revealed the facility will comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and requirements related to the handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of Schedule II and other controlled medications (Schedule II controlled medications are drugs regulated by the federal government that have accepted medical use but a high potential for abuse and dependence, requiring strict tracking and accountability). A clinical record review revealed Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on February17, 2025, with diagnoses that include Spina Bifida, (a birth defect in which the spinal column does not close completely, which may result in paralysis, loss of sensation, and incontinence) and Major Depressive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that psychotropic (medications that affect mood, behavior, or mental processes) medications were used in accordance with regulatory requirements by failing to implement and document non-pharmacological interventions and failing to ensure appropriate duration and rationale for as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medication orders for two of 15 residents reviewed (Residents 6 and 63).Findings include: A review of the policy entitled, Behavioral Assessment, Intervention, and Monitoring last reviewed May 13, 2025, indicated the facility will provide and residents will receive behavioral health services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. The policy statement indicated that the facility would adhere to regulatory requirements related to the use of medications to manage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy and clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) to prevent the spread of infection for one of 15 residents reviewed (Resident 3).Findings include: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2024), Enhanced Barrier Precautions are measures to reduce the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO) (bacteria that are resistant to multiple antibiotics and are difficult to treat) in nursing homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions require gown and glove use during resident care activities that have been demonstrated to result in transfer of MDROs to the hands and clothing of healthcare personnel. Enhanced Barrier Precautions are recommended for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g., residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices). The CDC (2024) identifies residents who are considered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
  Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of employee personnel records, review of facility policies and procedures, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program to ensure licensed nursing staff possessed the knowledge and competencies necessary to safely manage a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line) for 1 resident (Resident 63) of 15 residents reviewed.Findings include:Federal regulation requires that a facility develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff. The facility must use the facility assessment, which is an evaluation the facility conducts to identify the resident population served to determine the amount and types of training necessary to ensure staff competencies meet the needs of the residents as identified in their care plans and the facility assessment. A review of the facility policies entitled Medication Administration. Policy 5.09 Intravenous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of clinical records, facility policy, controlled drug shift count records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure the timely acquisition and administration of a prescribed intravenous (IV) antibiotic for one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 34), and maintain accurate controlled drug shift count documentation on one of two medication carts reviewed, thereby failing to promote accountability and medication safety. Finding included: A review of a facility policy entitled Medication Availability last reviewed by the facility May 2024, indicated a procedure if a medication is not available the facility's procedure required staff to check the Cubex (is an automated medication dispensing machine system used for healthcare management that helps deter delayed medication administration and improve inventory management for healthcare facilities). If the prescribed medication was not available, staff were to contact the pharmacy for delivery status and request STAT (immediate) delivery and place a call into the satellite…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 37), who expressed suicidal ideations. Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities that interfere with daily functioning). A progress note dated April 2, 2025, at 11:45 a.m., documented that the resident expressed suicidal ideation, stating to a staff member that she wanted to kill herself. Following this, the resident was evaluated by the facility's social services department and placed on every 15-minute checks. However, a review of the resident's comprehensive care plan, in effect as of the survey ending May 1,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $239K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA