Fox Subacute At Mechanicsburg
120 South Filbert St, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 · For profit - Corporation · 56 certified beds · (717) 458-0930 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Feb 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $14,886 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-29)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 38.9% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 4.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 10.8% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 59.1% | 20.0% | 18.9% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.5% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.0% | 25.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.9% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.1% | 68.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.25 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.65 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 63% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 14.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.70 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 49.9 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.47 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.76 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.74 to 0.81 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-11-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility investigation, facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility displayed past noncompliance in that they had failed to ensure each resident the right to be free from neglect, resulting in harm for one of three resident records reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Abuse Reporting, last reviewed January 23, 2023, revealed the policy statement was, The facility shall protect its residents to the fullest extent possible from physical[,] verbal, sexual or mental abuse, acts of neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and misappropriation of residents' property. As all residents have the right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, neglect or misappropriation of property. All individuals not adhering to said policy shall jeopardize their position with the facility. Review of the policy's definitions section revealed the policy defined neglect as, .failure to provide oneself…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-11-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility investigation, facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility displayed past noncompliance in the failure to follow the plan of care and provide the required assistance during a transfer, resulting in harm as evidenced by a leg fracture, for one of three resident records reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's expectations for direct care staff states, Our patients all have transfer orders in POC [Plan of Care] and you are expected to follow them. Mechanical Lifts require two (2) [person] assist AND must use the proper sling size determined by weight .All orders must be followed. If you have any questions, it is your responsibility to ask the Registered Nurse or an experienced member of the [NAME] team. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (congenital disorder affecting movement, muscle tone, and/or posture) and end stage renal disease (severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-22 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to discuss the risks/benefits and obtain consent for psychotropic medications for two of two resident records reviewed (Residents 48 and 49).Findings include: Review of Resident 48's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included major depressive disorder severe with psychotic features (a severe form of depression characterized by the presence of psychotic symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, alongside typical depressive symptoms) and generalized anxiety disorder (a mental health condition that causes fear, a constant feeling of being overwhelmed and excessive worry about everyday things). Review of Resident 48's physician's orders revealed the use of quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication) with an ordered date of April 15, 2025; and lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) with an ordered date of October 17, 2025. Review of Resident 48's physician order history revealed that he had been on these types of medications since January 24, 2025. Review of Resident 48's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Medication Regimen Reviews were reviewed and responded to by the attending physician or prescriber for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 3, 6, and 15).Findings include:Review of facility policy, titled Medication Regimen Review (Monthly Report), without revision date, revealed, Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and or the prescriber.Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included heart failure (the heart can't pump enough oxygen-rich blood to meet the body's needs, causing symptoms like shortness of breath, fatigue, and swelling; often from underlying issues like high blood pressure or coronary artery disease) and respiratory failure (a serious condition where the lungs can't adequately oxygenate the blood or remove carbon dioxide).Review of Resident 3's medical record revealed a recommendation made on December 10, 2025, by the consultant pharmacist to add additional monitoring for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the care plan was reviewed and revised to reflect the resident's current status for two of 12 residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 4).Findings include:Review of facility policy, titled Care Plan and Conference, last reviewed December 31, 2025, read, in part, Purpose: To facilitate communication of all disciplines of pertinent patient information to formulate a useful care plan that will drive patient care and improve outcomes. Procedure: Ongoing communication between nursing and the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator will occur with any change in resident condition.Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or remove enough carbon dioxide) and dependence on a respirator (unable to breath independently and relies on a machine for life sustaining respiration).Review of Resident 1's physician orders revealed an order for trach type…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for one of three residents observed during medication administration pass (Resident 46).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Administration, dated November 30, 2025, with a last review date of December 31, 2025, revealed, in part, that gastrostomy tube [a flexible feeding tube placed through the abdominal wall and into the stomach which allows nutrition to be placed directly into the stomach] placement will be confirmed by auscultation with air prior to medication administration. Review of Resident 46's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (the inability of the respiratory system to meet the oxygenation requirements of the body, dependence on a ventilator, and presence of gastrostomy tube. Review of Resident 46's physician orders revealed an order for Confirmation of feeding tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for one of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 4).Findings include:Review of facility policy, titled Wound Care and Pressure Ulcer Care last reviewed December 31, 2025, read, in part, Purpose: To manage wounds and or pressure ulcers and promote patient comfort. Check the doctor's order for specific wound care and medication instructions.Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included pressure ulcer of other site, stage 3 (injury to the skin and underlying tissue caused by prolonged pressure on the skin), chronic respiratory failure (lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or remove enough carbon dioxide), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of facility documents, titled Wound Evaluation & Management Summary dated October 27, 2025; November 7, 2025;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label medications properly and failed to discard expired medications in one of two medication rooms observed (First Floor Medication Room).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Pharmacy Services, dated November 28, 2018, with a last review date of December 31, 2025, revealed, in part, All opened multi-dose vials will be dated at the time that they are opened. Review of tuberculin skin testing solution information revealed that tuberculin skin testing solution expires 30 days after the initial puncture into the vial. Observation of the First Floor Medication Room with Employee 1 on January 21, 2026, at 8:54 AM, revealed two opened vials of tuberculin skin testing solution. One bottle had no open date noted and the other vial was dated December 4, 2025. During a staff interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant Director of Nursing on January 21, 2026, at 9:20 AM, the DON acknowledged multi-dose vials should be dated when opened and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the administration of medications for one of three residents observed during medication administration observation (Resident 33).Findings include: Observation of Resident 33's medication administration by Employee 2 on January 21, 2026, at 10:05 AM, revealed Employee 2 donned her gown and gloves upon entering Resident 33's room. Employee 2 sat Resident 33's cups of prepared medications down on the heating unit. Employee 2 was then observed to use both of her gloved hands to pick the fall mat up off the floor on the left side of the bed and lean it against the wall. Employee 2 then placed Resident 33's cups of prepared medications on top of the upright fall mat that she had placed against the wall. Employee 2 then proceeded to administer Resident 33's medications via her gastrostomy tube (a flexible feeding tube placed through the abdominal wall and into the stomach, which allows nutrition to be placed directly into the stomach). During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Controlled Drugs, Accountability and Responsibility, updated November 30, 2018, revealed The Controlled Drug Record, specific to the drug being administered, is to be signed by the nurse at the time the drug is given to avoid medication errors and discrepancies. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs) and hypotension (low blood pressure). Review of Resident 1's physician orders revealed an order for oxycodone (narcotic pain medication), 2.5 mg (milligrams) every four hours as needed for moderate pain and oxycodone, 5 mg, every four hours as needed for severe pain. Review of Resident 1's controlled drug record for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident record was complete and accurately documented for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Verbal Orders, Physician Orders and Diagnostic/Lab Results, updated November 30, 2018, revealed Upon receipt of a verbal diagnostic or laboratory test result, the nurse will document the results in PCC [Point Click Care-the facility's electronic medical record system] or appropriate form. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF- a chronic condition where the heart cannot pump blood effectively, leading to fluid buildup in the lungs, legs, and other parts of the body) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 1's physician orders revealed an order for labs dated March 8, 2025, for a CBC (complete blood count- a blood test used to look at overall health and find a wide range of conditions, including anemia, infection), a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to review and revise the resident's care plan for four of 14 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 26, 29, and 37). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plan and Conference, last revised November 30, 2018, read, in part, Purpose: To facilitate communication of all disciplines of pertinent patient information to formulate a useful care plan that will drive patient care and improve outcomes. Ongoing communication will occur between nursing and RNAC (Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator) will occur with any change in resident condition. Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dependence on respirator (ventilator) status (when a patient is unable to wean off a ventilator and breathe independently, they become ventilator dependent), congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services are provided in accordance with professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for three of 14 residents reviewed (Residents 9, 14, and 17). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Administration, with a last review date of December 31, 2024, revealed Medications are given at the time ordered or within 60 minutes before or after the time for bid [twice a day], tid [three times a day], or qid [four times a day] passes. Review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture), chronic respiratory failure (long term condition in which the respiratory system is unable to adequately exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide in the body), tracheostomy (an opening or incision in the windpipe to relieve an obstruction to breathing), and dependence on a ventilator (a machine or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections, consistent with physician orders and the resident's person-centered care plan, for one of five residents reviewed for catheter care (Resident 37). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Catheter- Indwelling, last revised November 30, 2021, read, in part, Purpose: To maintain constant urinary drainage, facilitate bladder irrigation, and monitor renal function and contain urinary drainage in seriously ill residents while maintaining a closed system. Criteria: must be documented for strict (foley- catheter) output if ordered by the physician. Review of Resident 37's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included obstructive uropathy (when urine can't flow normally through your urinary tract due to a blockage), congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of unnecessary medications for one of one resident reviewed for antibiotic use (Resident 9). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Regimen Review and Reporting, with a last review date of December 31, 2024, indicated that a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) is a thorough evaluation of the drug regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication and the consultant pharmacist reviews the medication regimen and medical chart of each resident at least monthly to appropriately monitor the medication regimen and ensure that the medications each resident receives are clinically indicated. Review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture), chronic respiratory failure (long term condition in which the respiratory system is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 26). Findings include: Review of Resident 26's clinical record on January 7, 2025, revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated/high blood pressure) and bipolar disorder (mental health disorder that causes extreme shifts in mood from depression to manic hyperactivity). Review of Resident 26's physician orders revealed orders for clonazepam (schedule IV controlled medication in the drug class of benzodiazepine) 3 milligrams (mg - metric unit of measure) every 24 hours as needed for restlessness for 14 days, with a start date of December 30, 2024, and end date of January 13, 2024. Review of Resident 26's clinical record revealed the as needed clonazepam had been continuously reordered every 14 days over the course of the prior year and beyond. Resident 26 also had a separate, standing order for clonazepam 1 mg two times a day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were afforded the right to secure and confidential personal and medical records for one of 14 residents reviewed (Resident 18). Findings include: Review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included quadriplegia (paralysis of both arms and both legs) and tracheostomy status (artificial opening to the trachea [aka windpipe] through which a machine provides breathing assistance). During observations on January 7, 2025, it was observed, from the hallway, that a paper was taped to the wall outside Resident 18's room to the left of the room number sign. It was observed that written on the paper was Resident 18's first name and clinical assessment findings, along with other statements. Written on the paper was the date of January 4, 202[5]. During a staff interview on January 8, 2025, at approximately 1:20 PM, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed that the paper contained notes written to communicate information for Resident 18's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the listed emergency contact person (Resident's Representative) of a critical lab value for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Notification of Change in Status, updated November 30, 2018, revealed Purpose: To notify patient and/or family of any change in treatments or status, and to allow patient and/or family the opportunity to be involved in treatment or care if they so desire. Procedure: .B. Non-life threatening situation or a change in care due to a minor process i.e. pneumonia, change in treatment or medication, test results. Documentation: B. Non-life threatening situation: 1. The nurse taking off or receiving new information will discuss the change(s) with the patient and/or family member and document the discussion. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included anemia (a condition in which the blood doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells and hemoglobin,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings Include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included anemia (a condition in which the blood doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells and hemoglobin, a protein found in red blood cells, to carry oxygen all through the body) and atrial fibrillation (Afib - an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow). Review of Resident 1's physician note dated August 8, 2024, revealed that the physician assessed Resident 1 for an episode of hematuria (blood in the urine). Further review of the physician note revealed I told nurses we will hold blood thinners for 2 days and will check CBC [complete blood count lab work], BMP [basic metabolic panel blood test] and magnesium [a blood test to measure the amount of magnesium in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — patternNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, personnel file review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were protected from the potential for abuse by failing to preform criminal history background checks prior to hire for one of five personnel files reviewed (Employee 14); and failed to verify the standing of professional licenses and/or nurse aide registry enrollment prior to hire for five of five personnel files reviewed (Director of Nursing [DON] and Employees 13, 14, 15, and 16). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Abuse Reporting, with an update of November 28, 2018, revealed, .criminal history background checks shall be performed on all newly hired employees seeking employment and monthly thereafter. In addition, the Nurse Aid Registry and appropriate state licensing boards shall be contacted for verification of status of every applicant seeking licensed position . Review of the Director of Nursing's (DON) personnel file revealed their nursing license verification was completed February 2, 2024, which was after her date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for four of 15 residents reviewed (Residents 10, 12, 18, and 50). Findings include: Review of Resident 10's clinical record on February 20, 2024, at 12:14 PM, revealed diagnoses that included pressure ulcer of right buttock stage four (wound that extends deep into tissues including muscle, tendons, and ligaments) and chronic respiratory failure (lungs ineffectively exchange carbon dioxide and oxygen). Review of Resident 10's quarterly minimum data sets (MDS -mandated assessment tool utilized to identify a resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs), with dates of March 29, 2023; August 7, 2023; and November 30, 2023, revealed section I1700 was coded no for MDRO (multi drug resistant organism). During a staff interview on February 22, 2024, at 11:29 AM, with Employee 2 (Infection prevention nurse) it was revealed Resident 10 has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records related to dialysis communication for one of one residents reviewed for diapysis services (Resident 18). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Hemodialysis, with a last revision date of November 30, 2018, and a last review date of December 27, 2023, indicated under section titled Documentation that 1. The dialysis unit doing the dialysis will supply copy of their completed record for the patient chart; and 3. All patient observations, interventions, etc. will be recorded in the patient record. Review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD-condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis) and bipolar disorder (a lifelong mood disorder and mental health condition that causes intense shifts in mood, energy levels, thinking patterns, and behaviors). Review of Resident 18's physician orders revealed the following orders: Dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility personnel documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed at least annually for three of five nurse aides reviewed (Employees 9, 10, and 11) and failed to ensure that in-service education was provided based on the outcome of these reviews for five of five nurse aides reviewed (Employees 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12). Findings Include: Review of personnel information revealed Employee 8's hire date was November 28, 2014, and that they had an annual performance review completed on May 22, 2023, but failed to reveal that in-service education was provided based on the outcome of this review. Review of personnel information revealed Employee 9's hire date was July 8, 2022; Employee 10's hire date was November 24, 2020; and Employee 11's hire date was August 15, 2021. Further review of personnel information for Employees 9, 10, and 11, failed to reveal that annual performance reviews were completed and that in-service education was provided based on the outcome of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, product manufacturer label, observations, and clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (17 errors in 32 observations, 53.13%). Findings include: Review of the clinical record for Resident 7 revealed the resident has a gastric tube (tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach). Review of Resident 7's current physician orders revealed medication orders for the following medications: Valium (medication for seizures) 5 mg, Metoclopramide (medication to treat stomach) 10 mg, Lamotrigine (medication for seizures) 25 mg, Lamotrigine 200 mg, Lasix (diuretic medication) 40 mg, Baclofen (medication for muscle spasms) 10mg, and Metoprolol (blood pressure medicine) 25mg. Observation on February 21, 2024, at 8:56 AM, revealed Employee 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN]) was observed administering the above listed medications to Resident 7. Employee 1 crushed all of the above listed medications together and administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and utilize equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen, receiving area, and three of three nourishment areas. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Storage- Food, not dated, read, in part, Food should be stored in a manner which maximizes food quality and safety. Review of facility policy, titled Labeling and Dating of Food, not dated, read, in part, Condiments in pantry areas will be discarded and replaced monthly. Any foods found that are not labeled and dated need to be discarded immediately. Observation of the dish machine in the main kitchen on February 20, 2024, at 9:49 AM, revealed the sanitizing final rinse cycle reached a maximum temperature of 178 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Review of the dish machine temperature log for February 2024, revealed all sanitizing final rinse temperatures recorded in the month of February were below the minimum temperature for food service safety of 180…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel training records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each nurse aide was provided with the required in-service training consisting of no less than 12 hours per year for five of five nurse aide employee records reviewed (Employees 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12); failed to provide annual training that included dementia management and resident abuse prevention for four of five nurse aide employee records reviewed (Employees 8, 9, 10, and 11); and failed to provide annual training that included dementia management for one of five nurse aide employee records reviewed (Employee 12). Findings Include: Review of personnel information revealed Employee 8's hire date was November 28, 2014; Employee 9's hire date was July 8, 2022; Employee 10's hire date was November 24, 2020; Employee 11's hire date was August 15, 2021; and Employee 12's hire date was March 28, 2019. Review of facility training records failed to reveal that the aforementioned Employees completed 12 hours of required annual training in the past 12 months. Further review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise the resident plan of care for two of 15 residents reviewed (Residents 18 and 20). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plan and Conference, last revised November 30, 2018, revealed, in part, Purpose: To facilitate communication of all disciplines of pertinent patient information to formulate a useful care plan that will drive patient care and improve outcomes .The care plan process will be monitored by all disciplines as necessary based on the resident's assessment of problems and needs. Review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (a lifelong mood disorder and mental health condition that causes intense shifts in mood, energy levels, thinking patterns, and behaviors) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest in things). Review of Resident 18's physician orders revealed an order for Venlafaxine Hydrochloride oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain adequate personal grooming of residents dependent on staff for assistance with these activities of daily living (ADLs) for two of 15 residents reviewed (Residents 31 and 37). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Quality of Life, dated November 28, 2018, revealed 1. The facility will promote, maintain and enhance each resident's dignity and respect his or her individuality. a. Grooming residents as they wish to be groomed. Review of Resident 31's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (occurs when a rapid, erratic heart rate begins suddenly and then stops on its own within seven days), and chronic kidney disease stage 4 (kidneys are moderately or severely damaged and are not working as well as they should to filter waste from the blood). Review of Resident 31's current care plan revealed an intervention with a revision date of October 13, 2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent infection of a pressure ulcer for one of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 12). Finding include: Review of facility policy, titled wound care and pressure ulcer care, with an update date of November 30, 2018, failed to reveal guidance for hand hygiene during wound care. Review of facility policy, titled hand hygiene, with a revision date of November 30, 2022, revealed procedure section B read, in part, hand hygiene is performed using hand washing or ABHR (alcohol based hand rub) before and after the following scenarios: before and after direct contact with residents, before performing any non-surgical invasive procedures, before handling clean or soiled dressing, gauze pads, etc., after removing gloves or an entire set of PPE (personal protective equipment), before performing an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 84). Findings include: Review of Resident 84's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (a stroke-damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply), anoxic brain damage (injury to the brain that occurs when the oxygen supply to the brain is compromised or interrupted), and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 84's physician orders revealed an order for Resident to wear bilateral resting hand splints during the day to prevent contracture of wrist and fingers. Approach: Bilateral resting hand splints to be worn four hours a day, three times a week. Off for self-care, ROM (range of motion), skin checks, monitor for skin breakdown, dated January 31, 2024. Observation of Resident 84 on February 20, 2024, at 10:38 AM, revealed that they had both of their hands closed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring for acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of 15 residents reviewed (Resident 20). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Weights, last revised November 30, 2020, revealed, in part, Notify Medical Provider, RNAC (Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator), and Registered Dietitian within 24 hours, if the re-weight verifies a significant weight change for the resident. The Registered Dietitian will update/revise the resident's Care Plan to reflect the significant weight change, goals, and approached. Review of Resident 20's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included protein calorie malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients your body needs to function and the nutrients it gets), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a form of diabetes that is characterized by high blood sugar, insulin resistance, and relative lack of insulin). Review of Resident 20's care plan revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for residents receiving tube feedings for one of seven residents reviewed for tube feedings (Resident 31). Findings Include: Review of Resident 31's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (occurs when a rapid, erratic heart rate begins suddenly and then stops on its own within seven days), and chronic kidney disease stage 4 (kidneys are moderately or severely damaged and are not working as well as they should to filter waste from the blood). Review of Resident 31's current physician orders revealed an order dated October 27, 2023, for enteral feed (also known as tube feeding, is a way of sending nutrition right to the stomach or small intestine), Nepro at 50 mL/hour with free water flush of 40 mL every hour. Observation of Resident 31's feeding tube on February 20, 2024, at 11:29 AM, and February 21, 2024, at 9:49 AM, revealed Resident 31's feeding pump was set to give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident was evaluated appropriately for the use of side rails for one of three residents reviewed for side rails(Resident 31). Findings Include: Review of Resident 31's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (occurs when a rapid, erratic heart rate begins suddenly and then stops on its own within seven days), and chronic kidney disease stage 4 (kidneys are moderately or severely damaged and are not working as well as they should to filter waste from the blood). Observation on February 20, 2024, at 11:32 AM, revealed Resident 31 in bed, with bilateral side rails attached to the top of the bed. Review of Resident 31's physician orders revealed an order dated October 30, 2023, for 1/4 side rails to assist with bed mobility and repositioning. Further review revealed that order was discontinued on February 16, 2024, and a new order was placed on February 16, 2024, for 1/4 rails for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection for one of 13 residents reviewed (Resident 12). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled wound care and pressure ulcer care, with an update date of November 30, 2018, revealed section titled procedure B 4, Discard the dressing and gloves in the waterproof red trash bag. Review of Resident 12's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included pressure ulcer of other site, unstageable (an ulcer that has full thickness tissue loss but is either covered by extensive necrotic tissue or by an eschar) and candidiasis (fungal infection caused by a yeast). Review of Resident 12's current physician orders revealed a treatment order dated February 12, 2024, to cleanse the left lateral foot with normal sterile saline (NSS), apply medihoney (ointment with anti-inflammatory effects) to the wound bed, and cover with foam adhesive dressing daily and as needed (PRN) and lifetime…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of regulations, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an Infection Preventionist (IP) that worked at least part time at the facility. Findings Include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regulation §483.80(b)(3) states, The facility must designate one or more individual(s) as the infection preventionist(s) (IP)(s) who are responsible for the facility ' s IPCP. The IP must: Work at least part-time at the facility. The IP must physically work onsite in the facility. He/she cannot be an off-site consultant or perform the IP work at a separate location such as a corporate office or affiliated short term acute care facility. Review of facility policy, titled Infection Preventionist, with a review date of November 30, 2023, revealed The IP works at least part-time at the facility. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on February 21, 2024, at 11:41 AM, he stated that the prior IP left the role in December 2023 and Employee 2 has been the designated IP since then. He further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate clinical record documentation for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the facility policy, titled Verbal Orders, Physician Orders and Diagnostic/Lab Reports, last revised November 30, 2018, revealed, a physician's verbal order received in person or by telephone, the nurse will document the complete order on the physician's order sheet or in PCC (electronic health record) then verify the order by reading it back to the physician. A review of the clinical record for Resident 1 on December 13, 2023, revealed clinical diagnoses that included ventilator associated pneumonia ([NAME]-lung infection) and quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs). Further review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 1 is currently in the hospital with an active diagnosis of [NAME]. A review of the clinical record for Resident 1 failed to reveal any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility investigation, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility displayed past noncompliance in that they had failed to ensure staff report violations involving neglect of a resident for one of three resident records reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Abuse Reporting, last reviewed January 23, 2023, revealed the policy statement was, The facility shall protect its residents to the fullest extent possible from physical[,] verbal, sexual or mental abuse, acts of neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and misappropriation of residents' property. As all residents have the right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, neglect or misappropriation of property. All individuals not adhering to said policy shall jeopardize their position with the facility. Review of the policies definitions section revealed the policy defined neglect as, .failure to provide oneself or the failure of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$14,886 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $7,443 — penalty dated 2023-11-29
- $7,443 — penalty dated 2023-11-29
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN, RALPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/12/2010 |
| FOX SUBACUTE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 90% | since 04/23/2008 |
| PEOPLE'S BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 11/08/2016 |
| UPMC PINNACLE | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/23/2008 |
| BOYD, VERONICA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/12/2010 |
| FOULKE, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/23/2008 |
| MURRAY, JOSEPH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/23/2008 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 396122. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.