No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Courtyard Gardens Nursing And Rehab Ctr

999 West Harrisburg Pike, Middletown, PA 17057 · Non profit - Corporation · 102 certified beds · (717) 944-3351 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (717) 944-3351 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
2 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1025 W Harrisburg Pike · (717) 944-0491 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Cvs0.3 mi
1565 W Harrisburg Pike · (717) 944-9681 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1577 W Harrisburg Pike · (717) 944-6606 · Call to confirm hours
Park
664 N Union St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.1%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.5%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.6%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened30.8%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.2%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.7%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.5%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.1%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine61.8%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission37.6%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit0.0%9.5%12.0%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.581.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.201.181.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
44.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 44.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.8%CMS range 30.9–53.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 6.5–16.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge44.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened9.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.3–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.721.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.30
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.84
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
42.0%
Total nursing turnover
35.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 89.2 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.555 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-19)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2026-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of select facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to ensure resident safety during transport, which resulted in actual harm as evidenced by an ankle fracture for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include:Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic atrial fibrillation (a long-lasting, irregular heartbeat) and diabetes (when the body doesn't produce enough insulin).Review of Resident 1's care plan revealed a focus area related to the Resident's activities of daily living (ADL) self-care deficit related to impaired cognition, muscle weakness, and decreased mobility. Further review revealed an intervention that the Resident required assistance of one staff for locomotion on the unit in a wheelchair, and for staff to make sure the Resident's feet sit comfortably on footrest, initiated on January 23, 2023.Further review of Resident 1's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2026-01-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the clinical record, electronic hospital record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1), which resulted in actual harm to the Resident as evidenced by uncontrolled pain and subsequent hospitalization for pain management. Findings include:Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic atrial fibrillation (a long-lasting, irregular heartbeat) and diabetes (when the body doesn't produce enough insulin).Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed a Health Status Note written on March 31, 2025, at 4:18 AM, that the Resident was alert, and able to make her needs known.Review of Resident 1's April 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR), revealed an order for Acetaminophen Tablet 325 mg, give 650 mg by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain, max 3,000 mg within a 24-hour period, with a start date of February 18, 2025.Review of Resident 1's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practical well-being by not following physician orders as well as involve the physician in treatment changes for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings include:Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood) and hypertension (high blood pressure).Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with an abdominal fistula (an abnormal opening between the intestines or stomach and another organ or the skin, causing leakage of digestive fluids) which is covered with a colostomy bag (a discreet, odor-proof, disposable pouching system that collects waste from the body).Review of Resident 2's current physician orders revealed an active order for abdominal fistula care, cleanse all abdomen area and fistula site, apply the zinc…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 2).Findings include:Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood) and hypertension (high blood pressure).Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with an abdominal fistula, which is covered with a colostomy bag.Review of Resident 2's current physician orders revealed an active order for abdominal fistula care, cleanse all abdomen area and fistula site, apply the zinc oxide mixed with A&D ointment (vitamin A & D topical ointment) all over abdomen and around fistula site, then apply pantie liner or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident status for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 36). Findings Include: Review of Resident 36's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), psychosis (a mental disorder when a person has trouble telling the difference between what's real and what's not), and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 36's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial needs) with ARD (assessment reference date- last day of the assessment period) of May 3, 2024, revealed it was coded that the Resident received one insulin injection in the past 7 days and that an insulin order had changed in the past 7 days. Review of Resident 36's Quarterly MDS with ARD of August 2, 2024, revealed it was coded that the Resident received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for three of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 18, 69, and 81). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Care Plans, last reviewed December 28, 2023, read, in part, This facility will develop and maintain a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that include but are not limited to those identified in the comprehensive assessment. The plan of care will be reviewed in an ongoing manner and progress or lack thereof toward established goals will be documented within the medical record of the resident. If appropriate, the care plan will be revised as needed. Review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed diagnoses of muscle weakness (a lack of muscle strength) and disorders of phosphorus metabolism (a condition where blood phosphate levels are too low. Symptoms include muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent infection for one of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 69). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Skin Integrity Interventions and Protocol for The Middletown Home, last reviewed on December 28, 2023, revealed that interventions for pressure ulcer preventions include: Implement pressure-relieving measures for residents at risk, including: frequent repositioning, use of pressure-reducing mattresses and cushions, proper skin care, including cleansing and moisturizing, adequate nutrition and hydration, and management of incontinence. Review of Resident 69's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and peripheral vascular disease (a slow and progressive circulation disorder caused by narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop a Water Management Program for the prevention, detection, and control of water-borne contaminants, such as Legionella, a bacteria that may cause Legionnaires' Disease (a serious type of pneumonia). Findings include: During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on November 7, 2023, at 11:00 AM, the NHA was unable to provide a policy that addressed water management or a list of water management team members. During the interview with the NHA on November 7, 2023, data was requested and unable to be provided, that would support implementation of a water management program, such as Legionella risk assessment, a water system flow chart that identifies risk areas such as, testing of shower heads, the ornamental fountain, or the pond that is active during Spring and Summer. The facility was able to provide professional water testing with a most recent date of October 26, 2023, to determine proper functioning of the cooling systems for pH (acidity or basicity), total alkalinity,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observations, product label review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and beverages in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and four of four nourishment areas. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Food and Nutrition Services Policies and Procedures: Storage of Goods, revealed, Remove goods from storage for which the expiration date has passed .All foods will be labeled with month/day/year received .Leftovers are to be covered, labeled, and dated with use by date .All foods must be labeled and dated. Review of facility policy, titled Food and Nutrition Services Policies and Procedures: Foods Brought by Family/Visitors, revealed, Perishable foods must be destroyed daily .All food items must be labeled with the resident's name and use by date and the date brought in and/or opened. Observation of the dry storage area on November 5, 2023, at 9:39 AM, revealed: one bag of rice open without a date; one open bag of rotini without an open date; one open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident is informed of the items and services for which the resident may be charged and the amount of charges for those services at the conclusion of the Medicare A skilled services stay by issuing the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage form (SNF ABN) for two of three residents reviewed at the conclusion of the Medicare A covered stay (Residents 37 and 64). Findings Include: Review of Resident 37's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form revealed the Resident's last covered day of Medicare Part A services to be September 22, 2023. Continued review of the form revealed the facility had not issued the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage form [SNF-ABN, CMS-10055] at the conclusion of the Medicare Part A services stay. The SNF-ABN form is the liability form issued by skilled nursing facilities as the liability notice that describes an item or service that is usually paid for by Medicare, but may not be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on state regulations, surveyor observation, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 27). Findings Include: Review of the Pennsylvania Nursing Practice Act, Chapter 21.145. Functions of the LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), revealed The LPN administers medication and carries out the therapeutic treatment ordered for the patient in accordance with the following: The LPN may accept a written order for medication and therapeutic treatment from a practitioner authorized by law and by facility to issue orders for medical and therapeutic measures. Review facility policy, titled Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 2006, revealed in section B. Administration, Step 2. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician. Review of Resident 27's clinical record revealed diagnoses that include low back pain between the lower edge of the ribs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for two of 20 residents reviewed (Residents 38 and 53). Findings Include: Review of Resident 38's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow imprecise movement), dementia (a chronic disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease, marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 38's physician orders revealed an order for Geri Sleeves BUE (bilateral upper extremities) every shift for skin protection, may remove for care and soilage, with a start date of August 3, 2023. Observation of Resident 38 on November 5, 2023, at 1:28 PM, revealed Resident 38 asleep, sitting in a common area of the hall without Geri sleeves on. Observation of Resident 38 on November 6, 2023, at 10:18 AM, revealed Resident 38 in his room, drinking out of a cup without Geri sleeves on. Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident within 48 hours of the resident's admission for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 50). Findings Include: Review of Resident 50's clinical record revealed an admission date of September 19, 2022, and diagnoses that included osteoarthritis (a type of arthritis that occurs when flexible tissue at the ends of bones wears down) and abnormalities of gait (walking) and mobility (the ability to move or be moved freely and easily). Review of Resident 50's admission Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the Resident had experienced three or more falls in the last three months prior to admission, and that their fall risk score was 24. The guidelines on the Fall Risk Assessment indicated that a score of 10 or higher represents a high risk for fall. In the section of the Fall Risk Assessment titled Indicate Care Plan Action Taken, it was marked to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy reviews, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory services consistent with professional standards of practice for two of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 32 and 89). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Nebulizers - Use and Care dated June 2011 revealed After each use, wipe mouth piece with a paper towel, removing all moisture, and store in a plastic bag. Review of facility provided policy titled Oxygen therapy revised June 2019, revealed, Change the cannula, tubing, and humidifier bottle every week or more frequently, if needed. Review of Resident 32's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), dependence on supplemental oxygen, and sleep apnea (a potentially serious sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and starts). Review of Resident 32's current physician orders revealed the following orders: continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-11-07 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post daily current staffing and census for the following dates: October 31, 2023; November 1, 2, 4, and 5, 2023. Findings include: During entrance to the facility on November 5, 2023, at approximately 9:15 AM, the posted staffing was reviewed and observed to be dated October 30, 2023, and copier detail confirmed it was printed on October 30, 2023, at 2:01 AM. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on November 6, 2023, at approximately 2:00 PM, she confirmed that the staff person who is assigned to post the daily staffing forgot to create and post the staffing for October 31, 2023; November 1, 2, 4, and 5, 2023. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3) Management

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
EABY, DOUGLASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 05/29/2007
VOGEL, LOUISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/12/2025
OSEVALA, NICOLEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/29/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 40%Medicare 1%Other / private 59%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$310per resident / day
operating cost
$9,437per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$285per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395518. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next