No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Valley View Rehab And Nursing Center

2140 Warrensville Road, Montoursville, PA 17754 · Non profit - Corporation · 163 certified beds · (570) 433-3161 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (570) 433-3161 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (27% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1660 Sycamore Rd · (570) 326-8080 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid2.0 mi
760 Broad St · (570) 368-2629 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
519 State Route 87 · (570) 337-4224 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Loyalsock State Forest · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2255 Warrensville Rd

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased36.8%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.3%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.5%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.3%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.8%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.6%20.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.4%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table33.0%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.7%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.1%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.3%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.031.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.951.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 211 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.55U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.26hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 102 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.2%CMS range 29.7–46.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 9.2–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.9–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
1.19
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
26.7%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 163 beds and averages 136.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.47 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.65 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-10)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items in a safe and sanitary manner and maintain equipment in a sanitary condition, in the main kitchen of the facility and a resident pantry area on two of seven nursing units (Nursing Units 300 and 700). Findings include: Initial tour of the facility's main kitchen with Employee 6, Culinary Manager, on April 7, 2026, at 8:45 AM revealed the following: There were two storage containers of serving ware located under the dishwasher conveyor that Employee 6 identified as clean. The serving ware was not protected from contamination from the ambient environment. There were debris noted in multiple blue cups. Clear serving bowls had debris accumulated in them and several were wet. There was a black discoloration to areas of the ceiling in the dishwasher area especially where the ceiling met with the wall. There was peeling paint also noted where the ceiling met the wall. There was a significant accumulation of dust on two observed air vents in the ceiling above the dishwasher area. Two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess all potential risk areas for entrapment for five of six residents reviewed for accident hazards (Residents 2, 7, 12, 14, and 97). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Enabler Bar Policy and Procedures, last reviewed without changes on November 20, 2025, revealed (in part) that immediately after placement of assist bar(s) maintenance will conduct a bed inspection for bed entrapment points using the bed measurement device following the manufacturer's test methods inspection each zone (1-4). Zones 5, 6, and 7 must meet the required measurements as noted in this procedure. Zone 5 is defined in the policy as between split bedrails; and Zone 5 must be noted as, Not Applicable, if there are no split bedrails. Zone 6 is defined in the policy as between the end of the rail and the side edge of the head or footboard. The policy further notes that Zone 6 must be marked as Pass or Fail if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that active physician orders incorporated resident wishes related to end-of-life care for two of four residents reviewed for advanced directives concerns (Residents 7 and 56). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 56 revealed an active physician order dated May 30, 2025, for staff to implement full treatment in the event of a medical emergency (Full Code, chest compressions and breathing assistance). Resident 56's clinical record also included an active physician order dated June 2, 2025, for staff to implement DNR (Do Not Resuscitate, do not provide chest compressions or assist with breathing) directives in the event of a medical emergency. There was no POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment, portable medical order form that records treatment wishes so that emergency personnel know what treatments the resident wants in the event of a medical emergency) form in Resident 56's medical record. Interview with Employee 1 (licensed practical nurse) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and report to the appropriate agencies an allegation of resident-to-resident physical abuse for one of 26 records reviewed (Resident 128).Findings include: The facility policy entitled Abuse Prevention/ Elder Justice Act Suspicious Crime Reporting, last reviewed without changes November 20, 2025, revealed all residents of the facility have the right to live without fear of abuse. All nursing staff are required to immediately report residents found to have a bruise, other unexplained new mark, skin tear, or wound. An incident report is completed to document and investigate the findings. Employees are required to timely report any reasonable suspicion of resident abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property to their supervisor, the Director of Nursing, the Compliance officer, Nursing Home Administrator. If the events that cause reasonable suspicion do not result in serious bodily injury to the resident, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected a resident's status for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 40 and 139).Findings Review of a quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated October 26, 2025, revealed staff assessed Resident 40 as having no impairments of her lower extremities. Review of Resident 40's next quarterly MDS dated [DATE], staff assessed Resident 40 as having bilateral impairment to her lower extremities. Interview with Employee 4 (LPNAC) on April 10, 2026, at 10:55 AM revealed that Resident 40 did not have a decline in her range of motion. Employee 4 confirmed Resident 40's functional limitation in her range of motion was coded in error on the MDS dated [DATE]. The above findings for Resident 40 were reviewed with the Director of Nursing on April 10, 2026, at 11:32 AM. The facility failed to accurately assess…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop, revise, and ensure resident/resident representative participation in care plan decisions for four of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 11, 12, 82, and 139)Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 11 revealed nursing documentation dated December 29, 2025, at 3:35 PM that Resident 11 was on his knees in front of a standard chair, his arms braced on the arms of the chair. Review of the facility's incident/accident investigation dated December 29, 2025, indicated that per the interdisciplinary team review, physical therapy would screen Resident 11 in response to his fall. A physical therapy response dated December 29, 2025, indicated that staff gave Resident 11 a, reacher (handheld assistive tool designed to help individuals pick up or reach objects without bending or stretching) to utilize in order to increase safety. Review of Resident 11's plans of care that included one to address his potential for falls related to immobility and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to implement treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and hearing abilities for two of two residents reviewed for vision and hearing concerns (Residents 56 and 139).Findings include: Interview with Resident 56 on April 7, 2026, at 11:17 AM revealed that she had no professional eye appointments since her admission to the facility. Clinical record review for Resident 56 revealed that the facility admitted her on May 30, 2025. Review of Resident 56's diagnoses list indicated that she was diagnosed with essential hypertension (high blood pressure) and Parkinsonism (progressive neurological disorder that is characterized by degeneration of nerve cells in the brain). Both diagnoses risk damage to the eyes. Information available at https://www.parkinson.org/ (Parkinson's Foundation) included that Parkinson's can cause vision changes such as double vision, dry eyes, blurry vision, trouble reading, and difficulty opening the eyes. Some issues may be worsened by medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment free from the potential spread of infection related to indwelling catheter equipment for one of two residents reviewed for catheter concerns (Resident 11), respiratory equipment for one of two residents reviewed for respiratory concerns (Resident 139), and laundry processing in the facility's main laundry facilities.Findings include: Interview with Employee 8 (licensed practical nurse/infection control prevention coordinator) on April 10, 2026, at 12:40 PM revealed that the facility had no established policy or employee competency guideline that addressed the appropriate steps to ensure indwelling urinary catheter equipment remained free of contamination when not in use. The interview confirmed that the facility provided care to residents who exchange a smaller urinary collection (e.g., leg) bag during the day with a larger urinary collection bag overnight. Clinical record review for Resident 11 revealed active physician orders dated February 17,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain policies and procedures that each resident is offered a pneumococcal immunization per current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines; and failed to ensure that the resident's medical record included required documentation related to pneumococcal immunizations for one of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Resident 14).Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Influenza, RSV, Pneumococcal and COVID-19 Vaccination, last reviewed on March 14, 2025, revealed that a resident may receive a Pneumovax23 or Prevnar13 (PCV13) pneumococcal vaccine (once per lifetime or after five years if age [AGE] years of age or less following the first immunization). Upon admission, the resident will be screened to determine if they are current on pneumococcal immunizations and consent for pneumococcal vaccination will be obtained from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on closed clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to immediately notify a resident's representative of a change in a resident's condition for one out of three residents reviewed (Resident CR1).Findings include: Closed record review for Resident CR1 revealed that the resident had a diagnosis list that included atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm). Physician orders for Resident CR1 revealed an order dated June 6, 2024, at 8:00 PM for Apixaban (Eliquis; an anticoagulant medication that is used to treat and prevent blood clots) oral table five milligrams (mg) given one table by mouth every 12 hours for atrial fibrillation. A review of the November 2025 medication administration record (MAR) for Resident CR1 revealed that staff were documenting the medication as administered per the physician order. Resident CR1's care plan revealed a care plan created on May 31, 2024, that indicated the resident was on anticoagulant therapy related to atrial fibrillation. Nursing documentation for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the highest practicable care for three of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 40, 230, and 94). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Verbal, Telephone, and Written Physician Orders, last reviewed November 21, 2024, revealed that a physician's verbal or telephone order will be given to a licensed nurse and be immediately recorded on the resident's medical record by that licensed nurse. Telephone orders for medical treatment will be accepted only under circumstances where it is impractical for the orders to be given in a written manner by the responsible practitioner, when the judgement of the professional nurse and the situation requires expedient action, or when the physician calls the facility and requests that a telephone order be accepted. The facility policy entitled, Skin Tears, Risk Reduction, last reviewed November 21, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies, observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess for the risk of side rail entrapment for 6 of 7 residents reviewed for accident hazards (Residents 14, 44, 85, 102, 113, and 230). Findings include: Review of the facility's current policy entitled Maintenance Enabler Bar Procedure last reviewed November 20, 2024, revealed it is the facility policy that maintenance will place assist bars on the resident's bed and immediately conduct a bed inspection for bed entrapment points using a bed measurement device following the manufacturer's test methods to inspect each zone. The zones were not specified. Observation of Resident 102's room on May 20, 2025, at 10:51 AM revealed an enabler bar attached to the right side of the resident's bed. Resident 102 stated it was put there to help her in bed because she had falls. Review of facility documents revealed facility staff completed an enabler bar entrapment evaluation for Resident 102 on March 14, 2025, which revealed facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medications for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 72 and 86). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 72 on January 24, 2025. Review of a consultant pharmacist recommendation dated April 12, 2025, revealed as needed Ativan (an antianxiety medication) is the most effective intervention for reducing Resident 72's anxiety. The pharmacist recommended Ativan 0.5 milligrams (mg) every 12 hours as needed for anxiety for 30 days with a re-evaluation of Resident 72's Ativan use in 30 days to determine if ongoing use is indicated. Review of Resident 72's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated April 16, 2025, for Ativan 0.5 mg, one tablet every 12 hours as needed for agitation. Further clinical record review revealed that Resident 72's order for Ativan did not have a 14 day stop date and there was no physician's progress note that provided a rationale for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 11). Findings include: Observation of Resident 11 on May 21, 2025, at 9:10 AM revealed a urinary collection bag hanging from the left side of his bed. Clinical record review for Resident 11 revealed an active physician's order dated May 19, 2025, for the use of a Foley catheter (flexible tubing inserted through the penis into the bladder to drain urine) due to urinary retention related to bladder cancer. The order instructed staff to change the Foley as needed for obstruction, leaking, or if the closed system is compromised. Review of active plans of care for Resident 11 (including a care plan to address Resident 11's risk for urinary retention, incontinence, chronic kidney disease, and urinary tract infection) during the onsite survey revealed no plan of care that included the intervention of an indwelling Foley catheter. The surveyor reviewed the above concerns regarding Resident 11's care plans during an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, facility documentation, clinical record review, employee personnel record information, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the specific competencies and skill sets related to obtaining verbal or telephone physician orders for one of one employee reviewed (Employee 3; Resident 40). Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) QSO-24-13-NH memo dated June 18, 2024, noted that requirements specify that the facility assessment must include an evaluation of diseases, conditions, physical or cognitive limitations of the resident population, acuity (the level of severity of residents' illnesses, physical, mental, and cognitive limitations, and conditions) and any other pertinent information about the resident population as a whole that may affect the services the facility must provide. The assessment of the resident population should drive staffing decisions and inform the facility about what skills and competencies staff must possess to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by two of four residents reviewed (Residents 86 and 89). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 86 revealed that the facility admitted her on November 25, 2024, with diagnosis of Dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life). A review of Resident 86's significant change minimum data set (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the facility assessed Resident 86 as having a diagnosis of dementia. The facility determined that a care plan for dementia and cognitive loss would be developed. A review of Resident 86's care plan entitled, Impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes r/t (related to) Vascular Dementia initiated on December…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain routine dental services for one of three residents reviewed for dental concerns (Resident 67). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Dental Exams, last reviewed November 21, 2024, revealed that each resident will receive, at a minimum, an annual oral examination with a dentist or his/her choice. In addition to the minimum oral examination, each resident will be offered dental services every six months as his/her insurance will allow. Any resident or resident's responsible party may elect to have the annual oral examination done with the contract dentist. Interview with Resident 67's daughter on May 20, 2025, at 10:10 AM revealed that Resident 67 has natural teeth; however, Resident 67's daughter did not know the last time Resident 67 received professional dental services. Resident 67's daughter stated that she, .would love to see that happen. Clinical record review for Resident 67 revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment free from the potential spread of infection on one of six residents reviewed for infection control (Resident 83). Findings include: The policy entitled Standard Precautions and Transmission-Based Precautions, last reviewed without changes March 18, 2025, revealed the CDC recommends two tiers of precautions. In the first tier are those precautions designed for the care of all residents, regardless of their diagnosis or presumed infection status. Implementation of these standard precautions is the primary strategy for successful infection prevention and control. The second tier of precautions are designed only for the care of specified residents on a case-by-case basis. Airborne, Contact, and Droplet precautions are used for persons known or suspected to be infected or colonized with highly transmissible pathogens. These precautions will be instituted for any resident who has an active infection and/or requires more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and sanitation in the facility's main kitchen and three of seven nursing units (100, 300, 800). Findings include: An observation of the facility's main kitchen on June 17, 2024, at 8:30 AM revealed the following: The coffee beverage station lower shelf contained several dried brown liquid spills along with dust and debris. A white blanket was balled up in the back corner of the shelf along the wall with dried brown and orange stains on it. The tubing on several flavors of bag in box juice concentrates connecting them to the juice dispenser were sticky and covered in dust. The flooring under the steam table, serving area, fryer, and cooking equipment contained dried food and debris. The wall area beside the plate warmers was covered in dried food splatter. The lower shelves of two production tables had dust and debris. The sides and control panel area of the steam kettle were covered in dried liquid spills. The lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent (Residents 29 and 82). Findings include: The facility's medication error rate was 17.95 percent based on 37 medication opportunities with 7 medication errors. Observation of Employee 2, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), during a medication administration pass on June 17, 2024, at 8:32 AM revealed she poured and crushed both Metoprolol Tartrate (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) 12.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth and Potassium Chloride Extended Release (ER) 20 milliequivalent (mEq, a unit of measure used for electrolytes) one tab by mouth and attempted to administer them to Resident 29, who refused them. Observation of Employee 2 during a medication administration pass on June 18, 2024, at 8:48 AM revealed she poured and crushed Metoprolol Tartrate 25 mg, Paroxetine (a medication used to treat depression) 20 mg and Potassium Chloride ER and administered them in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0846 — pattern
    Have policies and procedures ensuring the administrator's responsibilities for facility closure are completed successfully.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and procedures and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a policy and procedure in place to address facility closure or termination of the facility's Medicare and/or Medicaid Provider Agreement. Findings include: During the entrance conference on June 17, 2024, at 8:35 AM the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing were asked to provide a copy of the facility's closure plan. The Director of Nursing revealed that the facility did not have a plan in the event of a facility closure. The Director of Nursing confirmed the facility was made aware of this during the previous full health survey in July of 2023. A follow-up interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on June 18, 2024, at 10:14 AM confirmed that the facility does not have a policy or procedure to address facility closure. 28 Pa Code 201.23 (c)(1) Closure of facility

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the administration of a COVID-19 immunization for four of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Residents 11, 109, 118, and 119). Findings include: The policy entitled COVID-19 Procedure for Testing, Quarantining, Source Control, and Vaccinations, last reviewed without changes on December 5, 2023, revealed the facility encourages everyone to remain up to date with all recommended COVID-19 vaccine doses. Residents, staff, and visitors will be offered COVID-19 vaccines through monthly booster clinics held at the facility. Clinical record review for Resident 119 revealed the facility admitted him on July 24, 2023. A review of Resident 119's immunization history information indicated that he received a COVID-19 immunization on March 4, 2021, April 1, 2021, and October 19, 2021. A review of facility documentation revealed that Resident 119's son gave permission on December 13, 2023, for the facility to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect resulting in injury for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 26). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 26 revealed a progress note dated May 24, 2024, at 6:00 AM that indicated she was being transferred in a mechanical lift when the top of the sling came loose, and she fell to the floor. She was noted to have bleeding from the back of her head. Assessment of her injuries indicated that she had a 2.5-centimeter (cm) x 0.3 cm laceration to the mid back of her head and a smaller laceration measuring 0.5 cm x 0.5 cm just above the other one. Review of the facility's investigation into Resident 26's fall revealed a statement from Employee 5, nurse aide, dated May 24, 2024, that indicated the lift slipped and Resident 26 slipped out of the sling onto the floor. Further review of the facility's investigation into Resident 26's fall revealed a statement dated May 24, 2024, at 9:00 AM from Employee 6,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an abuse prohibition policy to ensure a complete and thorough investigation of an incident involving the potential for neglect for one of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 79). Findings include: The current facility policy entitled Abuse Prevention/Elder Justice Act Suspicious Crime Reporting, last reviewed without changes on December 5, 2023, revealed that all residents of the facility have the right to live without fear of abuse. The facility will ensure that all allegations of mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, as well as injuries of unknown source, are reported timely. The facility will prevent abuse and neglect through assessment and monitoring of residents, and educating employees, residents, and resident representatives. The facility will protect the rights of the residents, promptly report, and investigate incidents of alleged resident abuse, Clinical record review for Resident 79 revealed a care plan (a summary of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to maintain the highest practicable care for three of 27 residents reviewed (Residents 11, 116, and 119). Findings Include: Clinical record review for Resident 116 revealed that the facility admitted her on December 8, 2023, with a diagnosis of a prolapsed vaginal vault (the top of the vagina folds into the lower vagina) after a hysterectomy (a surgical procedure to remove the uterus). Clinical record review for Resident 116 revealed consultation reports dated March 13, 2024, and June 11, 2024, that indicated she was seen by a gynecology physician to have her pessary (a device that is inserted into the vagina to prevent or control a prolapse of the vaginal vault, bladder, or uterus) checked. Further clinical record review of Resident 116's care plan revealed the pessary was not noted on her plan of care. The Director of Nursing was made aware of the concern that there was no mention of Resident 116's pessary in her plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to identify and assess a resident's decline in activities of daily living (ADL) for two of two residents reviewed for an ADL decline (Residents 10 and 118). Findings include: A review of Resident 10's MDS (Minimum Data Set, assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) assessment dated [DATE], noted nursing staff assessed Resident 10 as requiring the supervision of one staff for bed mobility. Resident 10's next quarterly assessment dated [DATE], revealed nursing staff assessed Resident 10 as declining and now requiring extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility. There was no documented evidence in Resident 10's clinical record to indicate that the facility identified or assessed Resident 10's decline in her ability to perform this activity of daily living. A review of Resident 118's MDS assessment dated [DATE], noted nursing staff assessed Resident 118 as independent with bed mobility. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered weights and feeding interventions for two of 27 residents (Residents 36 and 89). Findings include: Review of Resident 36's clinical documentation revealed the following physician orders: On January 17, 2024, and discontinued on March 1, 2024, staff were to complete a daily weight every day shift. Staff were to contact the physician if the weight increased by two-pounds in 24 hours or five-pounds in a week. On March 1, 2024, daily weights one time a day for CHF (Congestive Heart Failure, a heart condition that causes fluid build-up in the extremities and organs) for one week. On March 12, 2024, daily weights, make the physician aware if a two-pound weight gain in 24 hours or five pounds in one week, every day shift for CHF. Review of Resident 36's clinical documentation revealed no documented weights June 7, 2024. Further review of Resident 36's clinical documentation revealed that there was no physician notification…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was free of adverse medication reactions for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 50). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 50 revealed a pharmacy note to the physician dated March 12, 2024, informing the physician that the resident's concurrent use of the medications Omeprazole (a proton-pump inhibitor used to treat reflux disease) and Clopidogrel (a platelet inhibitor used to reduce the change of blood clot formation), may decrease the efficacy of the Clopidogrel, thus increasing the risk for clots. The pharmacist note questioned if the physician would like to switch the resident's proton pump inhibitor from Omeprazole to Pantoprazole (another proton pump inhibitor). Resident 50's physician responded to the pharmacist note on March 18, 2024, in agreement to change the resident's Omeprazole to Pantoprazole, and noted once the Pantoprazole arrives to discontinue the Omeprazole. Further review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medications for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 89). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 89 revealed a note to the attending physician/prescriber dated January 12, 2024, indicating that the following orders are due for a gradual dose reduction review, Buspirone (a medication used to treat anxiety) 5 milligrams (mg) in the morning and bedtime and 2.5 mg in the afternoon and Citalopram (a medication used to treat depression) 20 mg daily. Resident 89's physician checked the box on the form to indicate that she is benefitting from therapy without adverse effects and that the benefits of continued use outweigh risks. The prescriber did not indicate whether they agreed or disagreed to the recommendation or what benefit outweighed what the risk. Review of Resident 89's current physician orders revealed that there have been no changes to either of the medications. Interview with the Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of a medication pass observation report, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed prevent the potential spread of infection during medication administration on 1 of 7 nursing units (600 hall, Resident 29). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Specific Medication Administration Procedures Eye Drop Administration last reviewed on December 5, 2023, revealed the purpose was to administer ophthalmic solution/suspension into the eye in a safe, accurate, and effective manner. Review of the medication pass observation report for Employee 2, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), dated April 30, 2024, revealed that for ophthalmic (eye) medications gloves should be worn and a separate tissue should be used for each eye. Observation of Employee 2 during a medication administration pass to Resident 29 on June 17, 2024, at 8:32 AM revealed she administered one drop of Systane eye drops (used to relieve and prevent dry eyes) to each eye. She held the eye drops in her ungloved hand and pulled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and notify the appropriate agencies of an identified incident of potential resident misappropriation of property (medication) for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 4 and 5). Findings include: In an interview with Employee 1, licensed practical nurse (LPN), on June 5, 2024, at 9:33 AM she stated she was aware of a recent discrepancy with Resident 5's liquid morphine in which the color of the medication was a dark purplish color and was normally blue. Employee 1 indicated the bottle had been opened. In an interview with Employee 2, LPN, on June 5, 2024, at 9:38 AM she stated there was a recent report of Resident 5's opened bottle of liquid morphine being a different color than others on the unit, where it appeared a grayish/brown color instead of blue and the bottle was discarded. Employee 2 also indicated there had been prior recent discrepancies in the controlled substance count of doses remaining of liquid Morphine for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of employee competencies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff completed competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs for three of nine employees (Employees 1, 2, and 3; Residents 1, 2, and 3). Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed that the facility admitted him on October 25, 2023, with orders for nursing staff to use and care for a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line (a catheter inserted into the upper arm that goes into the larger central veins near the heart). Nursing documentation dated October 26, 2023, at 5:30 AM revealed that Employee 1, registered nurse, used Resident 1's PICC line to draw blood. Resident 1 indicated that his PICC line was never used to draw blood at the hospital. Nursing documentation dated October 26, 2023, at 9:21 PM revealed that Employee 2, registered nurse, changed Resident 1's PICC line dressing. Employee 2 documented that he changed the caps on the ends of the PICC lines. Nursing documentation dated October…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-04-10 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the results of the most recent surveys were posted in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives in one of one area reviewed (main lobby). Findings include: Observation of the main lobby of the facility on April 7, 2026, at 2:20 PM revealed a binder in a wall pocket that was titled, Department of Health Survey / Notice of Privacy Practices, that should contain the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility. Further review of the binder revealed that the most recent survey was dated July 28, 2023. These findings were reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator on April 7, 2026, at 2:23 PM. A follow-up interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on April 7, 2026, at 2:31 PM revealed that the recent survey results were not printed and placed in the binder. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-04-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly contain and dispose of garbage at the observed facility trash dumpster.Findings include: Observation of the facility's main dumpster on April 7, 2026, at 9:00 AM revealed the following: There were multiple medical gloves in the grass area adjacent to the dumpster. There was various debris on the ground that included a crumpled cigarette pack, a discarded spoon, and additional debris. There was a mattress discarded on the ground in the grass area adjacent to the dumpster. The mattress top had water and dead leaves accumulated on the top of it. The above information was reviewed in a meeting with the Director of Nursing on April 8, 2026, at 2:45 PM. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ALEXANDER, AMYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/31/2025
CALDER, STEPHANIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/31/2025
FORQUER, ADELEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/31/2021
LEIDHECKER, ROBINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/31/2023
MCCREARY, GLENNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/31/2024
MUTCHLER, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/31/2024
VANEMON, KIMBERLYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/31/2025
WHITE, ELIZABETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/31/2022
FRY, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/04/2025
HOSTRANDER, AMYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/30/2017
JOHNSON, TARYNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/12/2023
STROBLE, TRACEYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/03/2019
DUFF, STEPHANIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 51%Medicare 7%Other / private 42%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$351per resident / day
operating cost
$10,685per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$352per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395895. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next