Premier At Perry Village For Nursing And Rehab, Ll

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 34.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 107.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility job description, clinical record review, review of facility investigation and documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility displayed past non-compliance in its failure to provide adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents, which resulted in harm, as evidenced by a scalp laceration and a leg injury for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of the facility's job description for a Transportation Driver, revealed [in part] must have knowledge of equipment used in long term care; and transports residents safely. Review of Employee 1's personnel file revealed that they were hired to be the Transportation Driver on January 30, 2024. Employee 1 signed the job description on January 30, 2024, and completed the self-evaluation portion of the job description. It was noted under section titled Specific Job Functions, Employee 1 had checked the self-evaluation column for Transports residents safely and in a timely manner to all appointments. The column on the job description titled Competency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for four of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 5, 14, 56, and 99).Findings Include:Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Review of Resident 5's comprehensive care plan revealed a care plan for being at risk for elopement with an intervention for the resident to have door alarms on at all times, with an initiation date of July 15, 2025; and an intervention for a wander guard, with an initiation date of July 15, 2025. Further review of Resident 5's elopement care plan revealed an intervention for a chair alarm that was discontinued on June 25, 2025.Review of Resident 5's Significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set is part of federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes) completed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0730 — isolated
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on facility document review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a performance review for nurse aide staff at least once every 12 months for two of five employees reviewed (Employees 1 and 2). Findings Include: Review of select facility documentation revealed that Employee 1 was hired on July 13, 2021, and Employee 2 was hired on October 15, 2024. Review of Employee 1's most recent employee performance evaluation revealed that it was dated as being completed on December 8, 2025. Review of Employee 2's most recent employee performance evaluation revealed that it was dated as being completed on December 9, 2025. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on December 11, 2025, at 11:22 AM, she stated that Employee 1's prior performance evaluation was completed on October 17, 2024. She further stated that Employee 2 was hired in October 2024 and did not have any previous performance evaluations completed. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee28 Pa. Code 201.19(2) Personnel policies and procedures

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation to residents to ensure a safe and orderly discharge from the facility; and failed to provide a discharge summary that included a post-discharge plan of care, including post-discharge services, for one of five discharged residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings Include:Review of facility policy, titled Discharging the Resident, dated December 2016, revealed If the resident is being discharged home, ensure that resident and/or responsible party receive teaching and discharge instructions.Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF-a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD-acid reflux). Further review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed that she was discharged to home on July 18, 2025. Review of Resident 1's physician orders revealed an order, dated July 18, 2025, for Home…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, facility document reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely notify a resident's physician of an incident that had the potential to result in a negative outcome for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 44). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, with a last review date of October 24, 2024, revealed, in part, facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status; and The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a(an): accident or incident involving the resident. Review of Resident 44's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a change in how your brain works due to an underlying condition that can cause confusion, memory loss and loss of consciousness), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for two of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 8 and 60). Findings Include: Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease). Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed a physician's order for Oxygen via nasal cannula to maintain saturation above 91 as needed for shortness of breath, with an active date of November 6, 2024. Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed Resident 8 was administered oxygen via nasal cannula on November 6, 7, 8, and 9, 2024. Review of Resident 8's MDS (Minimum Data Set is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes) dated November 11, 2024, revealed that Section O0110. C1. Oxygen therapy was marked No. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for three of 21 records reviewed (Residents 10, 60, and 75). Findings include: Review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). During an interview with Resident 10 on December 2, 2024, at 12:38 PM, she stated that she is a smoker with staff supervision. Review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed a smoking contract was signed by Resident 10 on August 27, 2024, and the most recent smoking evaluation was completed on November 12, 2024, which revealed Resident 10 could smoke with supervision. Review of Resident 10's current care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for three of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 11, and 60). Findings Include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included epilepsy (a brain condition causing recurring seizures) and multiple sclerosis (a chronic autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system). Review of Resident 1's care plan on December 2, 2024, revealed a care plan with a focus area of, Resident has an alteration in neurological function, with an intervention of IM (intramuscular) Ativan (benzodiazepine medication) as needed for seizure activity, with a date initiated of July 3, 2024. Review of Resident 1's physician orders on December 2, 2024, failed to reveal an order for Ativan for Resident 1. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on December 4, 2024, at 5:47 PM, revealed that Resident 1's Ativan was discounted in May 2024 and the care plan should have been updated at that time. Review of Resident 11's clinical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care/oxygen services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 44). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, with a last review date of October 24, 2024, indicated that Continuous Positive Airway Pressure or CPAP is a medical device which uses compressed air to keep the air passage open so breathing continues normally and that CPAP must be ordered by a physician. Review of Resident 44's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included obstructive sleep apnea (intermittent airflow blockage during sleep) and asthma (condition in which a person's airways become inflamed, narrow, and swell, and produce extra mucus which makes it difficult to breathe). Observations of Resident 44 on December 2, 2024, at 10:48 AM, and December 4, 2024, at 11:14 AM, revealed the presence of a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure which is a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adaptive feeding devices for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 53). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Assistance with Meals, last reviewed October 2024, read, in part, adaptive devices (special eating equipment and utensils) will be provided for residents who need them. These may include devices such as silverware with enlarged/padded handles, plate guards, and/or specialized cups. Review of Resident 53's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine) and anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease). Review of Resident 53's current active physician orders included: Equipment: lip plate, and Kennedy cup with meals, with an active date of September 10, 2024. Review of Resident 53's care plan included a focus area for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary manner during one of one tray line observations in the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of food service tray line on December 4, 2024, at 11:54 AM, revealed that Employee 1 (Cook) was wearing gloves on both hands. Employee 1 was observed to pick up a resident tray ticket from the top of a cart next to the food service line and lay it on a resident tray. Employee 1 was then observed to open a package of hamburger buns by ripping a hole in the bag. Employee 1 was then observed to removing a hamburger bun from the package using their same gloved hands which had touched the tray ticket and the hamburger bun packaging. Employee 1 was then observed reaching into a bin, removing lettuce and tomato, and placing them on a resident plate using their same gloved hands. Observation of Employee 1 revealed that the Employee was continuing to touch tray tickets, hamburger buns, lettuce, and tomato with the same gloved hands for three additional resident trays observed. During a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-05-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $930K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA