Nottingham Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 309 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 134 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 109.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-01-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, facility documentation, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident remained free from neglect, which resulted in actual harm with serious injuries, including diagnoses of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain), right hip contusion, and scalp laceration for one of one resident reviewed for abuse (Resident 41). Findings include: The facility policy entitled Abuse Prohibition, last reviewed without changes on July 20, 2023, revealed it is the policy of the facility that every resident will be free from mistreatment, neglect, and misappropriation of property. The facility will do all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse. This will be managed through a system of employee screening, staff training, resident and family awareness programs, procedures to identify abuse and contributing factors, procedures to report and investigate occurrences,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food service equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and store food in a sanitary manner in the facility's main kitchen and on two of three nursing units (Station 2 and Station 3). Findings include:An observation of the facility's main kitchen on November 12, 2025, at 9:30 AM with Employee 1, dietary manager, revealed the following: Debris and multiple dried brown liquid spots on the flooring underneath the coffee station area. The wall beside the area was covered in dried liquid splatter, with the broken pieces of drywall on the corner of the wall. A metal utensil rack hanging from the ceiling over the top of a food preparation table had multiple cooking utensils stored hanging from the rack such as spoon, ladles, whisks, and pans uncovered with food contact surfaces exposed to the potential for airborne particles such as dust and potential contamination and food preparation splatter from the table below it. A metal sheet tray located on a shelf under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-14 · tag F0699 — pattern
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an individualized plan of care related to a resident's history of trauma to eliminate or mitigate re-traumatization for two of two residents reviewed for behavior and emotional status (Residents 95 and 101). Findings include:Clinical record review for Resident 95 revealed a revealed a Social History Assessment dated November 11, 2025, for the resident who was admitted on [DATE]. The assessment indicated the resident had a traumatic life event involving the death of his son who was murdered. A review of Resident 95's plan of care revealed a focus area for the resident's trauma indicating the Resident has encountered a trauma that has resulted in physical, social, or emotional harm or life-threatening situation. This trauma has continued to have adverse effects on the residents individual functioning and mental, physical, social, emotional and spiritual well-being: he reports his son was murdered. The plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide resident bathing per preference for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 101). Findings include: In an interview with Resident 101 on November 12, 2025, at 11:48 AM the resident stated she is supposed to be getting a shower on Tuesdays and Fridays but does not get them. Resident 101 stated it happened again the day prior on Tuesday, November 11, 2025. Resident 101 stated staff come in early and just wash her up a little in bed and get her dressed but don't take her to the shower. Resident 101 stated her family member had discussed this with facility staff prior, but she still does not get them. Resident 101 stated I was one time a week showers during the day, then it changed to the night, then we got it changed to twice a week like I like it, and I still only get one a week.Clinical record review of Resident 101's bathing task revealed Resident 101 was scheduled upon admission October 14, 2025, to receive a shower on Tuesdays during the day shift.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected a resident's status for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 45).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 45 revealed a PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review, assessment required to ensure individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing facilities and/or receive necessary services in those settings) dated November 2, 2023, that assessed her as having met the criteria for further mental health review by the Department of Human Services (DHS). A letter from DHS dated November 7, 2023, confirmed that Resident 45 met the criteria to require that she receive ongoing mental health services for a serious mental illness that would be arranged by the facility (PASRR II). An annual MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated July 24, 2025, incorrectly assessed that Resident 45 was not considered by the state level II PASRR process to have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately assess the use of enabler bars for one of seven residents reviewed for accident hazards (Resident 10).Findings include: The facility policy titled, Bed Safety, last reviewed without changes on July 18, 2025, revealed the facility will try to prevent deaths and injuries from the beds and related equipment including the frame, mattress, side rails, headboard, footboard, and bed accessories. Approaches to this included, in part, inspection by maintenance staff of all beds and related equipment as part of the regular bed safety program to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks; and review the gaps within the bed system are within the dimensions established by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The policy provided by the facility did not further define the gaps. Clinical record review for Resident 10 revealed a diagnosis list that included multiple sclerosis (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than five percent (Residents 66 and 112).Findings include: The facility's medication error rate was five percent based on 34 medication opportunities with two medication errors. The policy entitled, Administration Procedures for All Medications, last reviewed without changes on July 18, 2025, revealed procedural steps that included to check the MAR (Medication Administration Record, an electronic system used by licensed staff to document the administration of medications) for the physician's order and if unfamiliar with the medication, consult a drug reference, manufacturer package insert, or pharmacist for more information. Observation of a medication administration pass on November 13, 2025, at 8:55 AM revealed Employee 2 (licensed practical nurse) administered Omeprazole (medication that reduces acid in the stomach and relieves symptoms such as heartburn) 40 mg…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an eligible resident received a pneumococcal vaccine for one of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Resident 45). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Pneumococcal Vaccine, last reviewed without changes on July 18, 2025, revealed that all residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. Pneumococcal vaccines will be administered to residents (unless medically contraindicated, already given, or refused) per the facility's physician-approved pneumococcal vaccination protocol. Administration of the pneumococcal vaccines or revaccinations will be made in accordance with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations at the time of the vaccination. Current CDC recommendations for the pneumococcal vaccinations note that the United States uses two types of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided that was consistent with professional standards of practice for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of the current facility policy entitled Pain Assessment/Management, revealed at the time of a pain interview, if it is determined that the resident is having pain on a scale of 7 to10, or severe pain (regardless of frequency), or is having frequent or constant pain (that the resident does not feel is tolerable), the resident will be placed on a pain management program, unless otherwise documented on the pain assessment. The pain management program consists of assessing/observing for pain at least every shift and updating the physician if pain is not being managed effectively. Pain management will be documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR, a form utilized to document the administration of medications) by licensed staff. The charge nurse will update…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain consent for, assess the need for, and assess entrapment risks from bed assistive bars for two of two residents reviewed for accident hazards (Residents 19 and 108). Findings include: Observation of Resident 19 on December 4, 2024, at 11:52 AM revealed she was in bed with assist bars mounted bilaterally at the head of her bed. Resident 19's bed was also equipped with a headboard and a footboard. The surveyor requested evidence of an assessment for need, an assessment for entrapment risks, and consent for the use of the bed assistive devices for Resident 19 during an interview with the Director of Nursing, the Nursing Home Administrator, and Employee 8 (registered nurse/infection control prevention coordinator) on December 4, 2024, at 2:00 PM. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on December 5, 2024, at 10:10 AM indicated that the facility utilized a bed system measurement device to assess four zones of potential entrapment risks presented with the use of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-06 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure routine prophylactic dental services for one of three residents reviewed for dental concerns (Resident 62). Findings include: Interview with Resident 62 on December 3, 2024, at 12:49 PM revealed that he had natural teeth, but the, hygienist has never been here. Resident 62 indicated that no dental professional had cleaned his teeth, and he brushes his teeth. Interview with the Director of Nursing on December 5, 2024, at 10:40 AM confirmed that there was no evidence that a hygienist or dental professional provided prophylactic (preventative) cleaning of Resident 62's teeth in the past year. Following the interview with the Director of Nursing, the facility provided one progress note from the facility's consulting dental provider dated September 17, 2024, that was noted as an annual exam by the dentist. The progress note indicated that there was heavy soft plaque/food debris buildup, light hard calculus (hard deposit when soft plaque becomes calcified) deposits,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-01-05
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-29 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $456K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA